Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to COPS, 54870-54873 [2016-19584]
Download as PDF
54870
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange believes that the
proposal qualifies for accelerated
effectiveness in accordance with section
19(b)(2) of the Act. The Exchange
believes that there is good cause for the
Commission to accelerate effectiveness
because the proposed rule change is
consistent with the rules of at least two
competing options markets, which have
amended their rules to prevent
directional complex orders from
undermining market maker risk settings
and do not allow such orders to leg
out.16 The Exchange would like to
similarly enhance the protection it
provides to Market Makers. Because of
the non-traditional nature of these
directional complex orders, the
Exchange believes it unlikely that they
would execute against complex interest.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes
rejecting the orders outright (as opposed
to simply preventing them from legging
out) would have the same practical
impact for the order-sending firms and
would be the most effective and
transparent means of handling these
orders. Thus, accelerated approval of
this proposal would enable the
Exchange to implement the rule change
without delay, thereby strengthening
market maker risk settings and
enhancing the competitiveness of the
Exchange.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rejection of the
specified directional complex orders
would prevent such orders from
executing before triggering (and thus,
bypassing) the Market Maker risk
settings. The Exchange believes that the
potential risk of these types of
directional complex orders undermining
the effectiveness of Market Maker risk
settings outweighs any potential benefit
to OTP Holders or OTP Firms
submitting such orders. Market
participants would continue to be able
to enter each leg of such complex orders
as separate orders. Thus, the Exchange
believes good cause exists to accelerate
effectiveness of this proposal because it
would help eliminate a degree of
unnecessary risk borne by Market
Makers when fulfilling their quoting
16 See
supra n. 11.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
obligations to the markets, which would
in turn benefit all market participants
because Market Makers would be
encouraged to provide tighter and
deeper markets.
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–109 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2016–109.
This file number should be included on
the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review
your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the
Commission’s Internet Web site (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of
the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–109 and should be
submitted on or before September 7,
2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–19577 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78554; File No. SR–CBOE–
2016–059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to COPS
August 11, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 1,
2016, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to re-implement the
contributor compensation structure of
the Exchange’s Customized Option
Pricing Service (‘‘COPS’’),3 specifically,
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34–
67813 (September 10, 2012), 77 FR 56903
(September 14, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2012–083); 34–
67928 (September 26, 2012), 77 FR 60161 (October
2, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2012–090); 34–70705 (October
17, 2013), 78 FR 63265 (October 23, 2013) (SR–
CBOE–2013–097); 34–70845 (November 12, 2013),
1 15
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
54871
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Notices
the COPS data revenue-sharing plan.
The Exchange is not proposing to
change the fees for COPS data.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to re-implement the
contributor compensation structure of
the Exchange’s COPS,4 specifically, the
COPS data revenue-sharing plan. The
Exchange is not proposing to change the
fees for COPS data.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Background
COPS provides market participants
with an ‘‘end-of-day’’ 5 file and
‘‘historical’’ 6 files of valuations for
Flexible Exchange (‘‘FLEX’’) 7 options
and certain over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’)
options (collectively, ‘‘COPS Data’’).
78 FR 69168 (November 18, 2013) (SR–CBOE–
2013–104); 34–72621 (July 16, 2014), 79 FR 42616
(July 22, 2014) (SR–CBOE–2014–057); 34–74159
(January 28, 2015), 80 FR 5863 (February 23, 2015)
(SR–CBOE–2015–007); 34–74937 (May 12, 2015), 80
FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR–CBOE–2015–046);
and 34–76888 (January 13, 2016), 81 FR 12 (January
20, 2016) (SR–CBOE–2015–122).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34–
67813 (September 10, 2012), 77 FR 56903
(September 14, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2012–083); 34–
67928 (September 26, 2012), 77 FR 60161 (October
2, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2012–090); 34–70705 (October
17, 2013), 78 FR 63265 (October 23, 2013) (SR–
CBOE–2013–097); 34–70845 (November 12, 2013),
78 FR 69168 (November 18, 2013) (SR–CBOE–
2013–104); 34–72621 (July 16, 2014), 79 FR 42616
(July 22, 2014) (SR–CBOE–2014–057); 34–74159
(January 28, 2015), 80 FR 5863 (February 23, 2015)
(SR–CBOE–2015–007); 34–74937 (May 12, 2015), 80
FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR–CBOE–2015–046);
and 34–76888 (January 13, 2016), 81 FR 12 (January
20, 2016) (SR–CBOE–2015–122).
5 ‘‘End of day’’ refers to data that is distributed
prior to the opening of the next trading day.
6 ‘‘Historical’’ COPS data consists of COPS data
that is over one month old (i.e., copies of the ‘‘endof-day’’ COPS file that are over one month old).
7 FLEX options are exchange traded options that
provide investors with the ability to customize
basic option features including size, expiration
date, exercise style, and certain exercise prices.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
Market Data Express, LLC (‘‘MDX’’), an
affiliate of CBOE, offers COPS Data for
sale to all market participants. COPS
Data is available to ‘‘Subscribers’’ for
internal use and internal distribution
only, and to ‘‘Customers’’ who, pursuant
to a written vendor agreement between
MDX and a Customer, may distribute
the COPS Data externally (i.e., act as a
vendor) and/or use and distribute the
COPS Data internally.
COPS Data consists of indicative 8
values for four categories of
‘‘customized’’ options. The first category
of options is all open series of FLEX
options listed on any exchange that
offers FLEX options for trading.9 The
second category is OTC options that
have the same degree of customization
as FLEX options. The third category
includes options with strike prices
expressed in percentage terms. Values
for such options are expressed in
percentage terms and are theoretical
values.10 The fourth category includes
‘‘exotic’’ options.11
The Exchange uses values produced
by CBOE Trading Permit Holders
(‘‘TPHs’’) to produce COPS Data.
Participating CBOE TPHs submit values
to MDX on options series specified by
MDX on a daily basis. These values are
generated by the TPHs’ internal pricing
models. The valuations that MDX
ultimately publishes are an average of
multiple contributions of values from
participating CBOE TPHs. For each
value provided by MDX through COPS,
MDX includes a corresponding
indication of the number of TPH
contributors that factored into that
value.
CBOE TPHs that meet the following
objective qualification criteria are
allowed to contribute values to MDX for
purposes of producing COPS Data.
Interested CBOE TPHs must be
approved by the Exchange, have the
ability to provide valuations to MDX in
a timely manner each day after the close
8 ‘‘Indicative’’ values are indications of potential
market prices only and as such are neither firm nor
the basis for a transaction.
9 Current FLEX options open interest spans over
2,000 series on over 300 different underlying
securities.
10 These values are theoretical in that they are
indications of potential market prices for options
that have not traded (i.e., do not yet exist). Market
participants sometimes express option values in
percentage terms rather than in dollar terms
because they find it is easier to assess the change,
or lack of change, in the marketplace from one day
to the next when values are expressed in percentage
terms.
11 Exotic options are options which are generally
traded OTC and are more complex than standard
options, usually relating to determination of payoff.
An exotic option may also include a non-standard
underlying instrument, developed for a particular
client or for a particular market.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of trading, and sign a services agreement
with CBOE. Interested CBOE TPHs must
also have the ability to provide both
indicative and implied volatility
valuations on several different types of
options, including (i) options on all
open FLEX series traded on any
exchange that offers FLEX options for
trading, (ii) options on any potential
new FLEX options series, (iii) OTC
options that have the same degree of
customization as FLEX options, (iv)
customized options where the strike
price is expressed in percentage terms
(the valuations provided to MDX must
also be expressed in percentage terms),
and (v) exotic options. In addition,
interested CBOE TPHs must participate
in a testing phase with MDX. The values
submitted by a TPH during the testing
phase and in live production must meet
MDX’s quality control standards
designed to ensure the integrity and
accuracy of COPS Data. MDX has
implemented procedures including
monthly performance reviews to help
ensure the integrity and accuracy of
COPS Data.
To help ensure that MDX receives
numerous values from multiple TPHs
on a consistent basis, MDX shares
revenue from the sale of COPS Data
with participating CBOE TPHs.12 The
amount of revenue that MDX shares
with participating TPHs is a percentage
of the total revenue received by MDX
from the sale of COPS Data. The revenue
sharing is based on the following table:
Number of
participating
TPHs
3 ...................
4 ...................
5 or more .....
Total
revenue
share
(percent)
21
24
30
Revenue share
per TPH
7%.
6%.
30% divided by
the number of
participating
TPHs.
If only three TPHs participate, MDX
shares 21% of total revenue with each
TPH receiving a 7% share. If four TPHs
participate, MDX shares 24% of total
revenue with each TPH receiving a 6%
share. If five or more TPHs participate,
MDX shares 30% of total revenue
divided equally among the TPHs.
In July 2014, the Exchange submitted
a proposed rule change to, among other
things, temporarily change the COPS
contributor compensation structure
12 The fees that MDX charges for COPS Data are
set forth on the Price List on the MDX Web site
(www.marketdataexpress.com). MDX currently
charges a fee per option per day for ‘‘end-of-day’’
COPS data. The amount of the fee is reduced based
on the number of options valuations purchased.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
54872
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Notices
from a revenue sharing plan to a fixed
payment structure for a six-month
period (‘‘Fixed Payment Period’’).13 In
May 2015, the Exchange submitted a
proposed rule change to change the
COPS contributor compensation
structure for the remainder of 2015.14
Pursuant to that proposed rule change,
as of May 1, 2015, all revenue from the
sale of COPS Data was paid to COPS
contributors, with revenue divided
equally among COPS contributors. In
December 2015, (sic) As described in
that proposed rule change, MDX would
transition back to the revenue share
plan described above on January 1,
2016. In December 2015, the Exchange
submitted a proposed rule change to
extend the temporary suspension
through June 30, 2016.15
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to reimplement the temporary suspension
described above through the end of the
year. As such, all revenue from the sale
of COPS Data would be paid to COPS
contributors through December 31,
2016. As before, the revenue would
continue to be divided equally among
COPS contributors. The Exchange had
hoped that at the end June 2016, COPS
revenue would be at a level such that
the COPS contributors would receive a
revenue share roughly in line with the
fixed payments they received during the
Fixed Payment Period. This has not yet
occurred. The payments to COPS
contributors are intended to, at a
minimum, help COPS contributors
cover their costs of producing
valuations for COPS while the Exchange
continues to grow the COPS business.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.16 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 17 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
13 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
72621 (July 16, 2014), 79 FR 42616 (July 22, 2014)
(SR–CBOE–2014–057).
14 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–74937
(May 12, 2015), 80 FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR–
CBOE–2015–046).
15 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–76888
(January 13, 2016), 81 FR 12 (January 20, 2016) (SR–
CBOE–2015–122). The Exchange is not proposing to
eliminate the revenue share plan, but rather reimplement the temporary suspension as described
in this rule filing.
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 18 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is not designed to permit
unfair discrimination between CBOE
TPHs because all COPS data revenue
would be divided equally among TPH
contributors through December 31,
2016. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest in that it would provide
incentive for all of the COPS
contributors to participate in COPS
while the Exchange continues to grow
the COPS business, thereby helping to
maintain the quality of COPS Data.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. To the
contrary, the Exchange believes the
proposal is procompetitive in that it will
incentivize COPS contributors to
continue producing quality valuations
to help keep COPS competitive with
other similar market data products.19
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
18 Id.
19 Market data vendors including
SuperDerivatives, Markit, Prism, and Bloomberg’s
BVAL service produce option value data that is
similar to COPS Data. The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) also produces FLEX option
value data that is similar to the FLEX option value
data that is included in COPS.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Act 20 and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b–4 21 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2016–059 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2016–059. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
20 15
21 17
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Notices
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2016–059 and should be submitted on
or before September 7, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–19584 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78550; File No. SR–IEX–
2016–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Related to
Transaction and Regulatory Fees
August 11, 2016.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
5, 2016, the Investors Exchange LLC
(‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),4 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,5 Investors Exchange LLC
(‘‘IEX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to (i) adopt transaction fees applicable
to Members 6 of the Exchange pursuant
to IEX Rule 15.110(a) and (c) (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’), and (ii) adopt regulatory
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
5 17 CRF [sic] 240.19b–4.
6 See, IEX Rule 1.160(s).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 16, 2016
fees related to the Central Registration
Depository (‘‘CRD system’’), which will
be collected by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
pursuant to IEX Rule 15.110(a). The
Exchange proposes to implement the
rule change effective with its exchange
launch. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange’s
Web site at www.iextrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statement [sic] may be
examined at the places specified in Item
IV below. The self-regulatory
organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Transaction Fees
The Exchange proposes to implement
a fee schedule applicable to use of the
Exchange commencing on the date it
begins operating as a national securities
exchange. The Exchange currently
intends to commence operations as a
national securities exchange on or about
August 19, 2016. IEX proposes to
implement the Fee Schedule described
herein, which will be applicable to
transactions executed in all trading
sessions, effective with its exchange
launch.
(A) Displayed Match Fee
The Exchange does not propose to
charge any fee to Members for
executions on IEX that include resting
interest with displayed priority (i.e., an
order or portion of a reserve order that
is booked and ranked with display
priority on the Order Book either as the
IEX best bid or best offer (‘‘BBO’’) or at
a worse price on the Order Book) for
both the liquidity adding and liquidity
removing order.7
7 This pricing is referred to by the Exchange as
‘‘Displayed Match Fee’’ on the proposed Fee
Schedule with a Fee Code of ‘L’ to be provided by
the Exchange on execution reports.
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54873
(B) Non-Displayed Match Fee
The Exchange proposes to charge
$0.0009 per share (or 0.30% of the total
dollar value of the transaction for
securities priced below $1.00) to
Members for executions on IEX that
include resting interest with nondisplayed priority (i.e., an order or
portion of a reserve order that is booked
and ranked with non-display priority on
the Order Book either at the NBBO
midpoint or at a worse price on the
Order Book) for both the liquidity
adding and liquidity removing order,8
with the exception of executions on the
Exchange where the adding and
removing order originated from the
same Exchange Member and displayable
orders removing non-displayed liquidity
upon entry, each as described below.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Exchange does not propose to charge
any fee to Members for executions on
IEX that involve taking resting interest
with non-displayed priority where (a)
the liquidity removing order was
displayable (i.e., the order would have
booked and displayed if posted to the
Order Book) and (b) on a monthly basis,
at least 90% of the liquidity removing
Member’s aggregate executions of
displayable orders added liquidity
during such calendar month. However,
in such transactions, the non-displayed
liquidity adding interest will be subject
to the Non-Displayed Match Fee
described above.
(C) Internalization Fee
The Exchange does not propose to
charge any fee to Members for
executions on IEX when the adding and
removing order originated from the
same Exchange Member.9 Orders from
different market participant identifiers
of the same broker dealer, with the same
Central Registration Depository
registration number, would be treated as
originating from the same Exchange
Member.
(D) Routing Charges
The Exchange proposes to pass the fee
or rebate from an away trading center to
the Member and charge a fee of $0.0001
per share for all routing options offered
by the Exchange. All charges for routing
are applicable only in the event that an
8 This pricing is referred to by the Exchange as
‘‘Non-Displayed Match Fee’’ on the proposed Fee
Schedule with a Fee Code of ‘I’ to be provided by
the Exchange on execution reports.
9 This pricing is referred to by the Exchange as
‘‘Internalization Fee’’ on the proposed Fee Schedule
with a Fee Code of ‘S’ to be provided by the
Exchange on execution reports.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54870-54873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19584]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78554; File No. SR-CBOE-2016-059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to COPS
August 11, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 1, 2016, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to re-implement the
contributor compensation structure of the Exchange's Customized Option
Pricing Service (``COPS''),\3\ specifically,
[[Page 54871]]
the COPS data revenue-sharing plan. The Exchange is not proposing to
change the fees for COPS data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-67813 (September
10, 2012), 77 FR 56903 (September 14, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-083); 34-
67928 (September 26, 2012), 77 FR 60161 (October 2, 2012) (SR-CBOE-
2012-090); 34-70705 (October 17, 2013), 78 FR 63265 (October 23,
2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-097); 34-70845 (November 12, 2013), 78 FR 69168
(November 18, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-104); 34-72621 (July 16, 2014), 79
FR 42616 (July 22, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-057); 34-74159 (January 28,
2015), 80 FR 5863 (February 23, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-007); 34-74937
(May 12, 2015), 80 FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-046); and
34-76888 (January 13, 2016), 81 FR 12 (January 20, 2016) (SR-CBOE-
2015-122).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to re-implement the
contributor compensation structure of the Exchange's COPS,\4\
specifically, the COPS data revenue-sharing plan. The Exchange is not
proposing to change the fees for COPS data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-67813 (September
10, 2012), 77 FR 56903 (September 14, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-083); 34-
67928 (September 26, 2012), 77 FR 60161 (October 2, 2012) (SR-CBOE-
2012-090); 34-70705 (October 17, 2013), 78 FR 63265 (October 23,
2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-097); 34-70845 (November 12, 2013), 78 FR 69168
(November 18, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-104); 34-72621 (July 16, 2014), 79
FR 42616 (July 22, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-057); 34-74159 (January 28,
2015), 80 FR 5863 (February 23, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-007); 34-74937
(May 12, 2015), 80 FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-046); and
34-76888 (January 13, 2016), 81 FR 12 (January 20, 2016) (SR-CBOE-
2015-122).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
COPS provides market participants with an ``end-of-day'' \5\ file
and ``historical'' \6\ files of valuations for Flexible Exchange
(``FLEX'') \7\ options and certain over-the-counter (``OTC'') options
(collectively, ``COPS Data''). Market Data Express, LLC (``MDX''), an
affiliate of CBOE, offers COPS Data for sale to all market
participants. COPS Data is available to ``Subscribers'' for internal
use and internal distribution only, and to ``Customers'' who, pursuant
to a written vendor agreement between MDX and a Customer, may
distribute the COPS Data externally (i.e., act as a vendor) and/or use
and distribute the COPS Data internally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``End of day'' refers to data that is distributed prior to
the opening of the next trading day.
\6\ ``Historical'' COPS data consists of COPS data that is over
one month old (i.e., copies of the ``end-of-day'' COPS file that are
over one month old).
\7\ FLEX options are exchange traded options that provide
investors with the ability to customize basic option features
including size, expiration date, exercise style, and certain
exercise prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPS Data consists of indicative \8\ values for four categories of
``customized'' options. The first category of options is all open
series of FLEX options listed on any exchange that offers FLEX options
for trading.\9\ The second category is OTC options that have the same
degree of customization as FLEX options. The third category includes
options with strike prices expressed in percentage terms. Values for
such options are expressed in percentage terms and are theoretical
values.\10\ The fourth category includes ``exotic'' options.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Indicative'' values are indications of potential market
prices only and as such are neither firm nor the basis for a
transaction.
\9\ Current FLEX options open interest spans over 2,000 series
on over 300 different underlying securities.
\10\ These values are theoretical in that they are indications
of potential market prices for options that have not traded (i.e.,
do not yet exist). Market participants sometimes express option
values in percentage terms rather than in dollar terms because they
find it is easier to assess the change, or lack of change, in the
marketplace from one day to the next when values are expressed in
percentage terms.
\11\ Exotic options are options which are generally traded OTC
and are more complex than standard options, usually relating to
determination of payoff. An exotic option may also include a non-
standard underlying instrument, developed for a particular client or
for a particular market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange uses values produced by CBOE Trading Permit Holders
(``TPHs'') to produce COPS Data. Participating CBOE TPHs submit values
to MDX on options series specified by MDX on a daily basis. These
values are generated by the TPHs' internal pricing models. The
valuations that MDX ultimately publishes are an average of multiple
contributions of values from participating CBOE TPHs. For each value
provided by MDX through COPS, MDX includes a corresponding indication
of the number of TPH contributors that factored into that value.
CBOE TPHs that meet the following objective qualification criteria
are allowed to contribute values to MDX for purposes of producing COPS
Data. Interested CBOE TPHs must be approved by the Exchange, have the
ability to provide valuations to MDX in a timely manner each day after
the close of trading, and sign a services agreement with CBOE.
Interested CBOE TPHs must also have the ability to provide both
indicative and implied volatility valuations on several different types
of options, including (i) options on all open FLEX series traded on any
exchange that offers FLEX options for trading, (ii) options on any
potential new FLEX options series, (iii) OTC options that have the same
degree of customization as FLEX options, (iv) customized options where
the strike price is expressed in percentage terms (the valuations
provided to MDX must also be expressed in percentage terms), and (v)
exotic options. In addition, interested CBOE TPHs must participate in a
testing phase with MDX. The values submitted by a TPH during the
testing phase and in live production must meet MDX's quality control
standards designed to ensure the integrity and accuracy of COPS Data.
MDX has implemented procedures including monthly performance reviews to
help ensure the integrity and accuracy of COPS Data.
To help ensure that MDX receives numerous values from multiple TPHs
on a consistent basis, MDX shares revenue from the sale of COPS Data
with participating CBOE TPHs.\12\ The amount of revenue that MDX shares
with participating TPHs is a percentage of the total revenue received
by MDX from the sale of COPS Data. The revenue sharing is based on the
following table:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The fees that MDX charges for COPS Data are set forth on
the Price List on the MDX Web site (www.marketdataexpress.com). MDX
currently charges a fee per option per day for ``end-of-day'' COPS
data. The amount of the fee is reduced based on the number of
options valuations purchased.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
revenue
Number of participating TPHs share Revenue share per TPH
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3............................. 21 7%.
4............................. 24 6%.
5 or more..................... 30 30% divided by the number of
participating TPHs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If only three TPHs participate, MDX shares 21% of total revenue
with each TPH receiving a 7% share. If four TPHs participate, MDX
shares 24% of total revenue with each TPH receiving a 6% share. If five
or more TPHs participate, MDX shares 30% of total revenue divided
equally among the TPHs.
In July 2014, the Exchange submitted a proposed rule change to,
among other things, temporarily change the COPS contributor
compensation structure
[[Page 54872]]
from a revenue sharing plan to a fixed payment structure for a six-
month period (``Fixed Payment Period'').\13\ In May 2015, the Exchange
submitted a proposed rule change to change the COPS contributor
compensation structure for the remainder of 2015.\14\ Pursuant to that
proposed rule change, as of May 1, 2015, all revenue from the sale of
COPS Data was paid to COPS contributors, with revenue divided equally
among COPS contributors. In December 2015, (sic) As described in that
proposed rule change, MDX would transition back to the revenue share
plan described above on January 1, 2016. In December 2015, the Exchange
submitted a proposed rule change to extend the temporary suspension
through June 30, 2016.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-72621 (July 16,
2014), 79 FR 42616 (July 22, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-057).
\14\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-74937 (May 12,
2015), 80 FR 28319 (May 18, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-046).
\15\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-76888 (January 13,
2016), 81 FR 12 (January 20, 2016) (SR-CBOE-2015-122). The Exchange
is not proposing to eliminate the revenue share plan, but rather re-
implement the temporary suspension as described in this rule filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to re-implement the temporary suspension
described above through the end of the year. As such, all revenue from
the sale of COPS Data would be paid to COPS contributors through
December 31, 2016. As before, the revenue would continue to be divided
equally among COPS contributors. The Exchange had hoped that at the end
June 2016, COPS revenue would be at a level such that the COPS
contributors would receive a revenue share roughly in line with the
fixed payments they received during the Fixed Payment Period. This has
not yet occurred. The payments to COPS contributors are intended to, at
a minimum, help COPS contributors cover their costs of producing
valuations for COPS while the Exchange continues to grow the COPS
business.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\16\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \17\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between CBOE TPHs because all COPS data
revenue would be divided equally among TPH contributors through
December 31, 2016. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest in
that it would provide incentive for all of the COPS contributors to
participate in COPS while the Exchange continues to grow the COPS
business, thereby helping to maintain the quality of COPS Data.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the Exchange
believes the proposal is procompetitive in that it will incentivize
COPS contributors to continue producing quality valuations to help keep
COPS competitive with other similar market data products.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Market data vendors including SuperDerivatives, Markit,
Prism, and Bloomberg's BVAL service produce option value data that
is similar to COPS Data. The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
also produces FLEX option value data that is similar to the FLEX
option value data that is included in COPS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \21\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2016-059 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-059. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for
[[Page 54873]]
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-059 and should be
submitted on or before September 7, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-19584 Filed 8-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P