Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market LLC (“BOX”) Options Facility, 54147-54149 [2016-19319]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices
is applicable when the monthly rate of
return on investment of cash in the
Clearing Fund is equal to or greater than
0.25%.
Because the Clearing Fund
Maintenance Fee per member is
proportional to the average monthly
cash deposit of the member to the
Clearing Fund, members that generate
higher levels of activity and make
greater use of NSCC’s services will
generally be subject to a higher fee,
because such members typically
maintain higher Clearing Fund deposits
pursuant to the Rules.
NSCC views the proposed
implementation of the Clearing Fund
Maintenance Fee as a prudent way to
minimize the magnitude of, and
mitigate the need for, potential future
increases in other fees.
The proposed change will take effect
on August 1, 2016.
2. Statutory Basis
Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act 7
requires that NSCC’s Rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its
participants. The proposed fee is
equitably allocated among members
because it is based on each member’s
utilization of NSCC’s services, as
measured by their Clearing Fund
deposits. In addition, NSCC believes
that the proposed fee is reasonable
because it will enable NSCC to better
align its revenue with the costs and
expenses required for NSCC to provide
services to its members with a nominal
impact on members. Therefore, NSCC
believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(D).8
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
NSCC does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose a
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, because the
proposed fee will be equitably allocated
among members based on each
member’s utilization of NSCC’s services.
Members that have a higher level of
activities and greater use of NSCC’s
services will generally be subject to a
higher Clearing Fund Maintenance Fee
and members with lower usage will pay
less.
7 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D).
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 9 of the Act and paragraph (f)
of Rule 19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NSCC–2016–002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSCC–2016–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
9 15
8 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants, or Others
NSCC has not received or solicited
any written comments relating to this
proposal. NSCC will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received by NSCC.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
10 17
19:23 Aug 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54147
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NSCC and on DTCC’s Web site
(https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx). All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2016–002 and should be submitted on
or before September 6, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–19326 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78514; File No. SR–BOX–
2016–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market
LLC (‘‘BOX’’) Options Facility
August 9, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 29,
2016, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4
which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
54148
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend the Fee Schedule to adjust
certain fees in Section I.B. of the BOX
Fee Schedule on the BOX Market LLC
(‘‘BOX’’) options facility. While changes
to the fee schedule pursuant to this
proposal will be effective upon filing,
the changes will become operative on
August 1, 2016. The text of the proposed
rule change is available from the
principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room
and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web
site at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule for trading on BOX to
adjust certain fees in Section I.B. of the
BOX Fee Schedule.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Exchange Fees
Primary Improvement Order
Under the tiered fee schedule for
Primary Improvement Orders, the
Exchange assesses a per contract
execution fee to all Primary
Improvement Order executions initiated
by the particular Initiating Participant.
Percentage thresholds are calculated on
a monthly basis by totaling the Initiating
Participant’s Primary Improvement
Order volume submitted to BOX,
relative to the total national Customer
volume in multiply-listed options
classes. The Exchange proposes to
adjust the fee assessed in Tier 5.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
reduce the fee to $0.02 from $0.05. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Aug 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
Exchange notes that it is not proposing
any changes to the percentage
thresholds and the quantity submitted
will continue to be calculated on a
monthly basis by totaling the Initiating
Participant’s Primary Improvement
Order volume submitted to BOX,
relative to the total national Customer
volume in multiply-listed options
classes.
BOX Volume Rebate (‘‘BVR’’)
Next, the Exchange proposes to adjust
a rebate within the BVR. Under the
BVR, the Exchange offers a tiered per
contract rebate for all PIP Orders and
COPIP orders of 100 contracts and
under. Percentage thresholds are
calculated on a monthly basis by
totaling the Participant’s PIP and COPIP
volume submitted to BOX, relative to
the total national Customer volume in
multiply-listed options classes. The
Exchange proposes to increase the
rebate in Tier 5 for PIP Orders to $0.12
from $0.10. The Exchange notes that it
is not proposing any changes to the
percentage thresholds and the quantity
submitted will continue to be calculated
on a monthly basis by totaling the
Participant’s PIP and COPIP volume
submitted to BOX, relative to the total
national Customer volume in multiplylisted options classes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5)of the Act,5 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and
other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that reducing
the Primary Improvement Order fee to
$0.02 for Initiating Participants who
reach Tier 5 is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory. The
reduced fee is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as it is available to all
BOX Options Participants that initiate
Auction Transactions, and they may
choose whether or not to take advantage
of the discounted fees. The Exchange
believes that the proposed fee remains
reasonable and competitive when
compared to the auction transaction fees
on other exchanges.6
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
fees at other exchanges range from
$0.05 to $0.20. See Section IV of the Phlx Pricing
Schedule entitled ‘‘PIXL Pricing’’; International
Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) Schedule of Fees,
Section I. Regular Order Fees and Rebates ‘‘Select
Symbols.’’
The Exchange also believes the
proposed change to the BVR in Section
I.B. of the BOX Fee Schedule is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory. The BVR was adopted to
attract Public Customer order flow to
the Exchange by offering these
Participants incentives to submit their
PIP and COPIP Orders to the Exchange
and the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to now amend a specific
rebate within the BVR. The Exchange
believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to amend the BVR, as all
Participants have the ability to qualify
for a rebate, and rebates are provided
equally to qualifying Participants at
each tier. Finally, the Exchange believes
it is reasonable and appropriate to
continue to provide incentives for
Public Customers, which will result in
greater liquidity and ultimately benefit
all Participants trading on the Exchange.
Other exchanges employ similar
incentive programs;7 and the Exchange
believes that the proposed change is
reasonable and competitive when
compared to incentive fees at other
exchanges.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange is simply proposing to amend
certain fees and rebates for Auction
Transactions within the BOX Fee
Schedule. The Exchange believes that
the volume based rebates and fees
increase intermarket and intramarket
competition by incenting Participants to
direct their order flow to the exchange,
which benefits all participants by
providing more trading opportunities
and improves competition on the
Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 8 and
5 15
6 Comparative
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7 See Section B of the PHLX Pricing Schedule
entitled ‘‘Customer Rebate Program;’’ ISE Gemini’s
Qualifying Tier Thresholds (page 6 of the ISE
Gemini Fee Schedule); and CBOE’s Volume
Incentive Program (VIP).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,9 because it
establishes or changes a due, or fee.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that the
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or would otherwise further
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2016–38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2016–38. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
9 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Aug 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BOX–
2016–38, and should be submitted on or
before September 6, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–19319 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78512; File No. SR–NYSE–
2016–53]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
123D Relating to When a DMM May
Reopen a Security Electronically
August 9, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on July 28,
2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123D relating to when a DMM may
reopen a security electronically. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54149
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123D relating to when a DMM may
reopen a security electronically. The
proposed rule changes would provide
greater specificity regarding the
applicable reference price for
determining when a DMM may effect a
reopening transaction electronically.
Background
The Exchange recently amended Rule
123D to specify when DMMs may effect
an opening of a security electronically.4
Rule 123D(a)(1)(B) provides that
openings may be effectuated manually
or electronically (as provided for in Rule
104(b)(ii)) and that Exchange systems
will not permit a DMM to open a
security electronically if a DMM has
manually entered Floor interest. Rule
123D(a)(1)(B)(i) further provides that,
except under the conditions set forth in
paragraph (a)(1)(B)(ii) of Rule 123D, a
DMM may not effect an opening
electronically if the opening transaction
will be at a price more than 4% away
from the Official Closing Price, as
defined in Rule 123C(1)(e), or the
matched volume will be more than: (a)
150,000 shares for securities with an
average opening volume of 100,000
shares or fewer in the previous calendar
quarter; or (b) 500,000 shares for
securities with an average opening
volume of over 100,000 shares in the
previous calendar quarter.
Rule 123D(a)(1)(B)(ii) provides that if
as of 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, the E-mini
S&P 500 Futures are ± 2% from the prior
day’s closing price of the E-mini S&P
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78228
(July 5, 2016), 81 FR 44907(July 11, 2016) (SR–
NYSE–2016–24) (Approval Order) and 77491
(March 31, 2016), 81 FR 20030 (April 6, 2016) (SR–
NYSE–2016–24) (Notice of Filing) (‘‘Opening
Filing’’).
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54147-54149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19319]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78514; File No. SR-BOX-2016-38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') Options Facility
August 9, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 29, 2016, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to
[[Page 54148]]
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule to
adjust certain fees in Section I.B. of the BOX Fee Schedule on the BOX
Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. While changes to the fee
schedule pursuant to this proposal will be effective upon filing, the
changes will become operative on August 1, 2016. The text of the
proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the
Exchange's Internet Web site at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX
to adjust certain fees in Section I.B. of the BOX Fee Schedule.
Exchange Fees
Primary Improvement Order
Under the tiered fee schedule for Primary Improvement Orders, the
Exchange assesses a per contract execution fee to all Primary
Improvement Order executions initiated by the particular Initiating
Participant. Percentage thresholds are calculated on a monthly basis by
totaling the Initiating Participant's Primary Improvement Order volume
submitted to BOX, relative to the total national Customer volume in
multiply-listed options classes. The Exchange proposes to adjust the
fee assessed in Tier 5. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to reduce
the fee to $0.02 from $0.05. The Exchange notes that it is not
proposing any changes to the percentage thresholds and the quantity
submitted will continue to be calculated on a monthly basis by totaling
the Initiating Participant's Primary Improvement Order volume submitted
to BOX, relative to the total national Customer volume in multiply-
listed options classes.
BOX Volume Rebate (``BVR'')
Next, the Exchange proposes to adjust a rebate within the BVR.
Under the BVR, the Exchange offers a tiered per contract rebate for all
PIP Orders and COPIP orders of 100 contracts and under. Percentage
thresholds are calculated on a monthly basis by totaling the
Participant's PIP and COPIP volume submitted to BOX, relative to the
total national Customer volume in multiply-listed options classes. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rebate in Tier 5 for PIP Orders to
$0.12 from $0.10. The Exchange notes that it is not proposing any
changes to the percentage thresholds and the quantity submitted will
continue to be calculated on a monthly basis by totaling the
Participant's PIP and COPIP volume submitted to BOX, relative to the
total national Customer volume in multiply-listed options classes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that reducing the Primary Improvement Order
fee to $0.02 for Initiating Participants who reach Tier 5 is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The reduced fee
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it is available to all
BOX Options Participants that initiate Auction Transactions, and they
may choose whether or not to take advantage of the discounted fees. The
Exchange believes that the proposed fee remains reasonable and
competitive when compared to the auction transaction fees on other
exchanges.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Comparative fees at other exchanges range from $0.05 to
$0.20. See Section IV of the Phlx Pricing Schedule entitled ``PIXL
Pricing''; International Securities Exchange (``ISE'') Schedule of
Fees, Section I. Regular Order Fees and Rebates ``Select Symbols.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes the proposed change to the BVR in
Section I.B. of the BOX Fee Schedule is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. The BVR was adopted to attract Public Customer
order flow to the Exchange by offering these Participants incentives to
submit their PIP and COPIP Orders to the Exchange and the Exchange
believes it is appropriate to now amend a specific rebate within the
BVR. The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to amend the BVR, as all Participants have the ability
to qualify for a rebate, and rebates are provided equally to qualifying
Participants at each tier. Finally, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable and appropriate to continue to provide incentives for Public
Customers, which will result in greater liquidity and ultimately
benefit all Participants trading on the Exchange. Other exchanges
employ similar incentive programs;\7\ and the Exchange believes that
the proposed change is reasonable and competitive when compared to
incentive fees at other exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Section B of the PHLX Pricing Schedule entitled
``Customer Rebate Program;'' ISE Gemini's Qualifying Tier Thresholds
(page 6 of the ISE Gemini Fee Schedule); and CBOE's Volume Incentive
Program (VIP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is simply
proposing to amend certain fees and rebates for Auction Transactions
within the BOX Fee Schedule. The Exchange believes that the volume
based rebates and fees increase intermarket and intramarket competition
by incenting Participants to direct their order flow to the exchange,
which benefits all participants by providing more trading opportunities
and improves competition on the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \8\ and
[[Page 54149]]
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\9\ because it establishes or changes a
due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2016-38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2016-38. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2016-38, and should be
submitted on or before September 6, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-19319 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P