Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 54042-54043 [2016-19264]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
54042
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices
during the foregoing period may be
submitted during the subsequent 15-day
period to October 11, 2016.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ
Board’s Web site, which is accessible
via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Camille Evans at
Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482–
2350.
Dated: August 9, 2016.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–19412 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–570–983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 12, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on drawn
stainless steel sinks from the People’s
Republic of China. We invited
interested parties to comment but
received no comments or requests for a
hearing. Therefore, the final results
remain unchanged from the preliminary
results.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1766, or (202)
482–1823, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
12, 2016, the Department published the
Preliminary Results.1 The POR is April
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
19:23 Aug 12, 2016
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order
include drawn stainless steel sinks.
Imports of subject merchandise are
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) at subheadings 7324.10.000
and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
within the scope is dispositive.2
Limited of Guangdong are part of the
PRC-wide entity and will receive the
rate of that entity. Finally, we continue
to find that Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.
(Kehuaxing) made no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
Accordingly, no decision memorandum
accompanies this Federal Register
notice. For further details of the issues
addressed in this segment of the
proceeding, see the Preliminary Results
and the accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The final
weighted-average dumping margins for
the period April 1, 2014, through March
31, 2015 are as follows:
Producer/exporter
Final Results of Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1, 2014, through March 31, 2015. We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. We received no
comments or requests for a hearing. The
Department conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Jkt 238001
As noted above, the Department
received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this
segment of the proceeding. As there are
no changes from, or comments upon,
the Preliminary Results, the Department
finds that there is no reason to modify
its analysis. Thus, we continue to find
that sales of subject merchandise by
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware
Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) were
made at less than normal value (NV)
during the POR. We also continue to
grant separate rates to Feidong Import
and Export Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Afa
Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. Further, we
continue to find that B&R Industries
Limited, Zhongshan Newecan
Enterprise Development Corporation,
and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware
Co., Ltd./Superte invoiced as Foshan
Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd., Shunde
Foodstuffs J&C Industries Enterprise
Limited, Foshan Shunde MingHao
Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd., Franke Asia
Sourcing Ltd., Grand Hill Work
Company, Hangzhou Heng’s Industries
Co., Ltd., Jiangmen Hongmao Trading
Co;, Ltd., Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath
Industry Co., Ltd., Ningbo Oulin
Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. and Shunde
Foodstuffs Import & Export Company
2015, 81 FR 29528 (May 12, 2016) (Preliminary
Results).
2 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see the memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the 2014–2015
Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), dated May 5, 2016, which
can be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd ...........
Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath
Co., Ltd * .................................
Feidong Import and Export Co.,
Ltd * .........................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
1.65
1.65
1.65
* These companies demonstrated that they
qualified for a separate rate in this administrative review. As we did in the Preliminary Results, and consistent with the Department’s
practice, we continue to assign them the rate
calculated for the mandatory respondent in
this review.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
For Dongyuan, which has a weightedaverage dumping margin which is not
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), we calculated importer- (or
customer-) specific per-unit duty
assessment rates based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated
for the importer’s (or customer’s)
examined sales to the total sales
quantity associated with those sales, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Where an importer- (or customer-)
specific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
For the respondents which were not
selected for individual examination in
this administrative review and which
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices
percent; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
the companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that rate established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
is zero or de minimis, then a cash
deposit rate of zero will be established
for that company); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
qualified for a separate rate, the
assessment rate is equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin assigned to
Dongyuan, or 1.65 percent.
For the companies identified above as
part of the PRC-wide entity, we will
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem
assessment rate of 76.45 3 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR which were produced and/or
exported by those companies.
The Department has refined its
assessment practice in NME cases.
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
Dongyuan, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
PRC-wide rate. In addition, because the
Department determined that Kehuaxing
had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under Kehuaxing’s rate will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.4
Administrative Protective Order
3 The PRC-wide rate determined in the
investigation was 76.53 percent. See Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order,
78 FR 21592, 21594 (April 11, 2013). This rate was
adjusted for export subsidies and estimated
domestic subsidy pass through to determine the
cash deposit rate (76.45 percent) collected for
companies in the PRC-wide entity. See explanation
in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s
Republic of China: Investigation, Final
Determination, 78 FR 13019, 13025 (February 26,
2013).
4 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping
Proceedings).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Aug 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation,
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–19264 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–820, A–588–843, A–580–829, A–469–
807, A–583–828]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy,
Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain,
and Taiwan: Continuation and
Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54043
As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping (AD)
duty orders on stainless steel wire rod
(SSWR) from Japan, the Republic of
Korea (Korea), and Taiwan would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
orders. In addition, as a result of the
ITC’s determination that revocation of
the AD duty orders on SSWR from Italy
and Spain is not likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States, the Department is revoking the
AD orders on SSWR from Italy and
Spain.
SUMMARY:
AD Revocation (Italy and Spain):
Effective June 17, 2015; AD
Continuation (Japan, Korea, and
Taiwan): Effective August 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
On September 15, 1998, the
Department published the AD orders on
SSWR from Japan, Italy, Korea, Spain,
and Taiwan.1 On May 1, 2015, the
Department initiated 2 and the ITC
instituted 3 five-year (‘‘sunset’’) reviews
of the AD orders on SSWR from Japan,
Italy, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, 63 FR 49327
(September 15, 1998); Notice of Antidumping Duty
Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan, 63 FR
49328 (September 15, 1998); Notice of Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel
Wire Rod from Korea, 63 FR 49331 (September 15,
1998), as amended by Stainless Steel Wire Rod
From Korea: Amendment of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court
Decision, 66 FR 41550 (August 8, 2001); Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Spain, 63 FR 49330
(September 15, 1998); and Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod
from Taiwan, 63 FR 49332 (September 15, 1998).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).
3 See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy, Japan,
Korea, Spain, and Taiwan; Institution of Five-Year
Reviews, 80 FR 24970 (May 1, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54042-54043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China;
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks from the People's
Republic of China. We invited interested parties to comment but
received no comments or requests for a hearing. Therefore, the final
results remain unchanged from the preliminary results.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1766, or (202) 482-1823, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 12, 2016, the Department published
the Preliminary Results.\1\ The POR is April 1, 2014, through March 31,
2015. We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. We received no comments or requests for a hearing. The
Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81
FR 29528 (May 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel
sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings
7324.10.000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the merchandise within the scope is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled,
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2014-2015
Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's
Republic of China,'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated May 5,
2016, which can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review and Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this segment of the proceeding. As
there are no changes from, or comments upon, the Preliminary Results,
the Department finds that there is no reason to modify its analysis.
Thus, we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise by
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) were
made at less than normal value (NV) during the POR. We also continue to
grant separate rates to Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd. and Ningbo
Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. Further, we continue to find that B&R
Industries Limited, Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development
Corporation, and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd./Superte
invoiced as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd., Shunde Foodstuffs J&C
Industries Enterprise Limited, Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils
Co., Ltd., Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd., Grand Hill Work Company, Hangzhou
Heng's Industries Co., Ltd., Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co;, Ltd.,
Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Industry Co., Ltd., Ningbo Oulin Kitchen
Utensils Co., Ltd. and Shunde Foodstuffs Import & Export Company
Limited of Guangdong are part of the PRC-wide entity and will receive
the rate of that entity. Finally, we continue to find that Kehuaxing
Industrial Ltd. (Kehuaxing) made no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. Accordingly, no decision memorandum accompanies this
Federal Register notice. For further details of the issues addressed in
this segment of the proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and the
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The final weighted-
average dumping margins for the period April 1, 2014, through March 31,
2015 are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd.......... 1.65
Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd *...................... 1.65
Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd *........................ 1.65
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These companies demonstrated that they qualified for a separate rate
in this administrative review. As we did in the Preliminary Results,
and consistent with the Department's practice, we continue to assign
them the rate calculated for the mandatory respondent in this review.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
For Dongyuan, which has a weighted-average dumping margin which is
not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we calculated
importer- (or customer-) specific per-unit duty assessment rates based
on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total sales quantity
associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Where an importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate is zero or
de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
For the respondents which were not selected for individual
examination in this administrative review and which
[[Page 54043]]
qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate is equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Dongyuan, or 1.65 percent.
For the companies identified above as part of the PRC-wide entity,
we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45
\3\ percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which
were produced and/or exported by those companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The PRC-wide rate determined in the investigation was 76.53
percent. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic
of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592, 21594 (April 11,
2013). This rate was adjusted for export subsidies and estimated
domestic subsidy pass through to determine the cash deposit rate
(76.45 percent) collected for companies in the PRC-wide entity. See
explanation in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's
Republic of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019,
13025 (February 26, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department has refined its assessment practice in NME cases.
Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Dongyuan, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate. In addition, because the Department determined that Kehuaxing had
no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under Kehuaxing's rate will be liquidated at the PRC-wide
rate.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Proceedings).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be
that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if
the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will
be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide
entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-19264 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
