Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative Determination, 53433-53436 [2016-19379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 115.29 percent;
and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporter(s) that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement off
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–19258 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–821–811]
Ammonium Nitrate From the Russian
Federation: Final Results of Sunset
Review and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on ammonium nitrate from the Russian
Federation (Russia). Because no
domestic interested party filed a notice
of intent to participate in response to
the notice of initiation, the Department
is revoking the antidumping duty order
on ammonium nitrate from Russia.
DATES: Effective August 20, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo at (202) 482–3693, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 27, 2011, the Department
terminated the agreement suspending
the antidumping duty investigation and
issued an antidumping duty order on
ammonium nitrate from Russia.1 On
July 1, 2016, the Department initiated a
sunset review of the antidumping duty
Order pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).2 We received no notice of intent
to participate in response to the
Initiation Notice from domestic
interested parties by the applicable
deadline.3 As a result, the Department
concludes that no domestic party
intends to participate in this sunset
review.4 On July 21, 2016, we notified
the International Trade Commission, in
writing, that we intend to revoke the
Order.5
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes solid,
fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate
products, whether prilled, granular, or
in other solid form, with or without
additives or coating, and with a bulk
density equal to or greater than 53
pounds per cubic foot. Specifically
excluded from this scope is solid
ammonium nitrate with a bulk density
less than 53 pounds per cubic foot
(commonly referred to as industrial or
explosive grade ammonium nitrate). The
merchandise subject to this order is
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
at subheadings 3102.30.00.00 and
3102.290000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
within the scope is dispositive.
Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3),
if no domestic interested party files a
notice of intent to participate, the
Department shall issue a final
determination revoking the order within
90 days of the initiation of the review.
Because no domestic interested party
filed a notice of intent to participate in
1 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement
on Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate From
the Russian Federation and Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order; 76 FR 23569 (April 27, 2011) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review; 81
FR 43185 (July 1, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
3 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
4 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A).
5 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53433
this sunset review, the Department finds
that no domestic interested party is
participating in this sunset review.
Therefore, we are revoking the Order.
The effective date of revocation is
August 20, 2016, the fifth anniversary of
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the Continuation of the
Order.6
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
Department intends to issue instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to terminate the suspension of
liquidation of entries of the
merchandise subject to the order which
were entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 20, 2016. Entries of subject
merchandise prior to August 20, 2016,
will continue to be subject to the
suspension of liquidation and
requirements for deposits of estimated
antidumping duties. The Department
will conduct administrative reviews of
the order with respect to subject
merchandise entered prior to the
effective date of revocation in response
to appropriately filed requests for
review.
These final results of the five-year
(sunset) review and notice of revocation
of the antidumping duty order are
published in accordance with sections
751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–19248 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–827]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Turkey: Final
Affirmative Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain hot-rolled steel flat products
(hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of
Turkey (Turkey). For information on the
estimated subsidy rates, see the ‘‘Final
AGENCY:
6 See 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2); see also Continuation
of Antidumping Duty Order on Solid Fertilizer
Grade Ammonium Nitrate From the Russian
Federation, 76 FR 49449 (August 20, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
53434
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
Determination’’ section of this notice.
The period of investigation is January 1,
2014, through December 31, 2014.
DATES:
Effective August 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Halle or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0176 or (202) 482–
3586, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Determination on January
15, 2016.1 A summary of the events that
occurred since the Department
published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version are identical in
content.
Scope Comments
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the Preliminary
Scope Determination,3 the Department
set aside a period of time for parties to
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Negative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Alignment of Final
Determination with Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 81 FR 2166 (January 15, 2016)
(Preliminary Determination).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of
Turkey,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this determination and hereby
adopted by this notice.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the
Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, Turkey and the
United Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determinations,’’(March 14, 2016) (Preliminary
Scope Determination).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
address scope issues in case briefs or
other written comments on scope issues.
In the Preliminary Determination, we
did not modify the scope language as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice.4 No
interested party submitted scope
comments in case or rebuttal briefs;
therefore, the scope of this investigation
remains unchanged for this final
determination.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are hot-rolled steel from
Turkey. For a complete description of
the scope of this investigation, see the
‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in
Appendix I of this notice.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues that parties raised, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is attached
to this notice at Appendix II.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
The Department, in making these
findings, relied, in part, on facts
available and, because one or more
respondents failed to cooperate by not
acting to the best of their ability, we
made adverse inferences.5 For the final
determination, we are basing the
countervailing duty (CVD) rate for Eregli
Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S.
(Erdemir), in part, on facts otherwise
available, pursuant to sections
776(a)(2)(A), (C) and (D) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act). Further,
because the Government of Turkey did
not cooperate to the best of its ability in
this investigation, we also determine
that an adverse inference is warranted,
pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act.
For further information, see the section
‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences,’’ in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our review and analysis of
the comments received from parties,
and minor corrections presented at
verification, we made certain changes to
the respondents’ subsidy rate
calculations set forth in the Preliminary
Determination. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision
4 See Preliminary Determination and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
at ‘‘Scope Comments.’’
5 See Sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Memorandum and the Final Analysis
Memoranda.6
Final Determination
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
determined a countervailable subsidy
rate for each individually investigated
exporters/producers of the subject
merchandise (i.e., Erdemir and
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.). Section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that for
companies not individually
investigated, we will determine an ‘‘all
others’’ rate equal to the weighted
average of the countervailable subsidy
rates established for exporters and
producers individually investigated,
excluding any de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates and rates
determined entirely by adverse facts
available. In this investigation, the only
non-de minimis rate is the rate
calculated for Erdemir. Consequently,
the rate calculated for Erdemir is
assigned as the ‘‘all others’’ rate.
We determine the estimated net
countervailable subsidy rates are as
follows.
Company
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.
Eregli Demir ve Celik
Fabrikalari T.A.S..
All-Others ............................
Subsidy rate
0.34 percent
(de minimis).
6.01 percent ad
valorem.
6.01 percent ad
valorem.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties in
this proceeding the calculations
performed for this final determination
within five days of the date of public
announcement of our final
determination, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Suspension of Liquidation
Because the Preliminary
Determination was negative, we did not
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to suspend entries of
subject merchandise. In accordance
with sections 705(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we
are now directing CBP to suspend
liquidation of and to require the posting
of a cash deposit on all imports of the
subject merchandise from Turkey, other
than those produced and exported by
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. because its
rate is de minimis, that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also
Memoranda, ‘‘Final Determination Analysis for
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.,’’ and ‘‘Final
Determination Analysis for Eregli Demir ve Celik
Fabrikalari T.A.S.,’’ both dated concurrently with
this determination and hereby adopted by this
notice.
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. The suspension of liquidation
will remain in effect until further notice.
In addition, pursuant to section
705(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, we are
directing CBP to require a cash deposit
for such entries of merchandise in the
amount indicated above.
As our final determination is
affirmative and our preliminary
determination was negative, in
accordance with section 705(b)(3) of the
Act, the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) will determine
within 75 days whether the domestic
industry in the United States is
materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports or
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation of the subject merchandise.
We will issue a CVD order if the ITC
issues a final affirmative injury
determination. If the ITC determines
that material injury, or threat of material
injury, does not exist, this proceeding
will be terminated and all estimated
duties deposited or securities posted as
a result of the suspension of liquidation
will be refunded or canceled.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
determination. In addition, we are
making available to the ITC all nonprivileged and non-proprietary
information related to this investigation.
We will allow the ITC access to all
privileged and business proprietary
information in our files, provided the
ITC confirms that it will not disclose
such information, either publicly or
under an administrative protective order
(APO), without the written consent of
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
In the event the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice serves as the only reminder to
parties subject to APO of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation that is subject to
sanction.
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 705(d)
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: August 4, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation
are certain hot-rolled, flat-rolled steel
products, with or without patterns in relief,
and whether or not annealed, painted,
varnished, or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances. The products
covered do not include those that are clad,
plated, or coated with metal. The products
covered include coils that have a width or
other lateral measurement (‘‘width’’) of 12.7
mm or greater, regardless of thickness, and
regardless of form of coil (e.g., in
successively superimposed layers, spirally
oscillating, etc.). The products covered also
include products not in coils (e.g., in straight
lengths) of a thickness of less than 4.75 mm
and a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and
that measures at least 10 times the thickness.
The products described above may be
rectangular, square, circular, or other shape
and include products of either rectangular or
non-rectangular cross-section where such
cross-section is achieve subsequent to the
rolling process, i.e., products which have
been ‘‘worked after rolling’’ (e.g., products
which have been beveled or rounded at the
edges). For purposes of the width and
thickness requirements referenced above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual
measurements vary, a product is within the
scope if application of either the nominal or
actual measurement would place it within
the scope based on the definitions set forth
above unless the resulting measurement
makes the product covered by the existing
antidumping 7 or countervailing duty 8 orders
on Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products From the Republic of
Korea (A–580–836; C–580–837), and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for
a specific product (e.g., the thickness of
certain products with non-rectangular crosssection, the width of certain products with
non-rectangular shape, etc.), the
measurement at its greatest width or
thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of this
investigation are products in which: (1) Iron
predominates, by weight, over each of the
other contained elements; (2) the carbon
content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and
(3) none of the elements listed below exceeds
the quantity, by weight, respectively
indicated:
• 2.50 percent of manganese, or
7 Notice of Amendment of Final Determinations
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products From France, India, Indonesia,
Italy, Japan and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585
(February 10, 2000).
8 Notice of Amended Final Determinations:
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
From India and the Republic of Korea; and Notice
of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From France,
India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea,
65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000).
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53435
• 3.30 percent of silicon, or
• 1.50 percent of copper, or
• 1.50 percent of aluminum, or
• 1.25 percent of chromium, or
• 0.30 percent of cobalt, or
• 0.40 percent of lead, or
• 2.00 percent of nickel, or
• 0.30 percent of tungsten, or
• 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
• 0.10 percent of niobium, or
• 0.30 percent of vanadium, or
• 0.30 percent of zirconium.
Unless specifically excluded, products are
included in this scope regardless of levels of
boron and titanium.
For example, specifically included in this
scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized
(commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF))
steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels,
the substrate for motor lamination steels,
Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS), and
Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS). IF steels
are recognized as low carbon steels with
micro-alloying levels of elements such as
titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize
carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels
are recognized as steels with micro-alloying
levels of elements such as chromium, copper,
niobium, titanium, vanadium, and
molybdenum. The substrate for motor
lamination steels contains micro-alloying
levels of elements such as silicon and
aluminum. AHSS and UHSS are considered
high tensile strength and high elongation
steels, although AHSS and UHSS are covered
whether or not they are high tensile strength
or high elongation steels.
Subject merchandise includes hot-rolled
steel that has been further processed in a
third country, including but not limited to
pickling, oiling, levelling, annealing,
tempering, temper rolling, skin passing,
painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting,
punching, and/or slitting, or any other
processing that would not otherwise remove
the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the hot-rolled steel.
All products that meet the written physical
description, and in which the chemistry
quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
element levels listed above, are within the
scope of this investigation unless specifically
excluded. The following products are outside
of and/or specifically excluded from the
scope of this investigation:
• Universal mill plates (i.e., hot-rolled,
flat-rolled products not in coils that have
been rolled on four faces or in a closed box
pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not
exceeding 1250 mm, of a thickness not less
than 4.0 mm, and without patterns in relief);
• Products that have been cold-rolled
(cold-reduced) after hot-rolling; 9
• Ball bearing steels; 10
9 For purposes of this scope exclusion, rolling
operations such as a skin pass, levelling, temper
rolling or other minor rolling operations after the
hot-rolling process for purposes of surface finish,
flatness, shape control, or gauge control do not
constitute cold-rolling sufficient to meet this
exclusion.
10 Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which
contain, in addition to iron, each of the following
elements by weight in the amount specified: (i) Not
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
Continued
12AUN1
53436
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
• Tool steels; 11 and
• Silico-manganese steels; 12
The products subject to this investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7208.10.1500,
7208.10.3000, 7208.10.6000, 7208.25.3000,
7208.25.6000, 7208.26.0030, 7208.26.0060,
7208.27.0030, 7208.27.0060, 7208.36.0030,
7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 7208.37.0060,
7208.38.0015, 7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090,
7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030, 7208.39.0090,
7208.40.6030, 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000,
7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500,
7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000, 7211.19.4500,
7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560,
7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000,
7225.30.3050, 7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000,
7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 7226.11.9030,
7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and
7226.91.8000. The products subject to the
investigation may also enter under the
following HTSUS numbers: 7210.90.9000,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060,
7214.91.0090, 7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075,
7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7226.99.0180,
and 7228.60.6000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and U.S. Customs
and Border Protection purposes only. The
written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
VIII. Analysis of Programs
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2016–19379 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent of carbon;
(ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent
of manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of sulfur; (iv) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than 0.18 nor
more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than
1.25 nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii)
none, or not more than 0.28 percent of nickel; (viii)
none, or not more than 0.38 percent of copper; and
(ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of
molybdenum.
11 Tool steels are defined as steels which contain
the following combinations of elements in the
quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) More
than 1.2 percent carbon and more than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon
and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon
and 1 percent to 1.8 percent, inclusive, manganese;
or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent, inclusive,
chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive,
molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon
and not less than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi)
not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less than
5.5 percent tungsten.
12 Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels
containing by weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent
of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or more but not more than
1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6 percent or
more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon.
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
events occurred since the Preliminary
Determination was issued.
In March 2016, the Department
received supplemental cost responses
and revised sales files from Tata Steel
UK Ltd. (TSUK), the sole mandatory
respondent in this investigation.2
In June 2016, AK Steel (one of the
petitioners),3 and TSUK submitted case
briefs 4 and rebuttal briefs.5 A hearing
was held on June 21, 2016.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are certain hot-rolled steel
flat products from the United Kingdom.
For a complete description of the scope
of this investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of
the Investigation,’’ in Appendix I of this
notice.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope Comments
International Trade Administration
In the Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum,6 the Department set
aside a period of time for parties to
address scope issues in case briefs or
other written comments on scope issues.
In the Preliminary Determination, we
did not modify the scope language as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice.7 No
[A–412–825]
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the United Kingdom: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
imports of certain hot-rolled steel flat
products (hot-rolled steel) from the
United Kingdom are being, or are likely
to be, sold in the United States at less
than fair value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is July 1, 2014,
through June 30, 2015. The final
dumping margins of sales at LTFV are
listed below in the ‘‘Final
Determination’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Appendix II
VerDate Sep<11>2014
IX. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Changes in the
Ownership (CIO) of Erdemir’s Affiliates
Resulted in Countervailable Subsidies to
Erdemir
Comment 2: Whether the Government of
Turkey’s (GOT’s) Sale of Erdemir to
OYAK Resulted in a Privatization that
Extinguished the Benefits of Prior
Subsidies to Erdemir
Comment 3: Export Sales Denominator for
COTAS and Colakoglu Metalurji
Comment 4: COTAS’s Rediscount Program
Benchmark
Comment 5: Whether the Department
Should Correct Certain Errors in
Erdemir’s Preliminary Calculations
X. Recommendation
Background
On March 22, 2016, the Department
published the Preliminary
Determination of this antidumping duty
(AD) investigation.1 The following
1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From
the United Kingdom: Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures, 81 FR 15244
(March 22, 2016) (Preliminary Determination).
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 See Letter from TSUK, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from the United Kingdom: TSUK’s Section
D Second Supplemental Questionnaire Response’’
(March 22, 2016). See also Letter from TSUK,
‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from the United
Kingdom: TSUK’s Submission of Revised Sales
Files Due to Minor Corrections Presented at Sales
Verification’’ (March 25, 2016).
3 AK Steel Corporation (AK Steel), ArcelorMittal
USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, SSAB Enterprises,
LLC, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel
Corporation (collectively, the petitioners).
4 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products From The United
Kingdom/Petitioner’s Case Brief’’ (June 8, 2016);
and Letter from TSUK, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from the United Kingdom: Case Brief of
Tata Steel UK Ltd. and Tata Steel International
(Americas) Inc.’’ (June 8, 2016).
5 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products From The United
Kingdom/Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief’’ (June 13,
2016); and Letter from TSUK, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from the United Kingdom: Rebuttal Brief
of Tata Steel UK Ltd. and Tata Steel International
(Americas) Inc.’’ (June 13, 2016).
6 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain HotRolled Steel Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan,
the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, Turkey, and
the United Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’
dated March 14, 2016 (Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum).
7 See Preliminary Determination and
accompanying Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53433-53436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-489-827]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Flat Products From the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative
Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters
of certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the
Republic of Turkey (Turkey). For information on the estimated subsidy
rates, see the ``Final
[[Page 53434]]
Determination'' section of this notice. The period of investigation is
January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014.
DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0176
or (202) 482-3586, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the Preliminary Determination on January
15, 2016.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department
published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion
of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary
Negative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final
Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 81 FR 2166
(January 15, 2016) (Preliminary Determination).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of
Turkey,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
this determination and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preliminary Scope Determination,\3\ the
Department set aside a period of time for parties to address scope
issues in case briefs or other written comments on scope issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from
Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea,
Turkey and the United Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Determinations,''(March 14, 2016) (Preliminary
Scope Determination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Preliminary Determination, we did not modify the scope
language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice.\4\ No interested
party submitted scope comments in case or rebuttal briefs; therefore,
the scope of this investigation remains unchanged for this final
determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Determination and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at ``Scope Comments.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are hot-rolled steel
from Turkey. For a complete description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix I of
this notice.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are
discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues
that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice at Appendix II.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
The Department, in making these findings, relied, in part, on facts
available and, because one or more respondents failed to cooperate by
not acting to the best of their ability, we made adverse inferences.\5\
For the final determination, we are basing the countervailing duty
(CVD) rate for Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. (Erdemir), in
part, on facts otherwise available, pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A),
(C) and (D) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Further,
because the Government of Turkey did not cooperate to the best of its
ability in this investigation, we also determine that an adverse
inference is warranted, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. For
further information, see the section ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available
and Adverse Inferences,'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from
parties, and minor corrections presented at verification, we made
certain changes to the respondents' subsidy rate calculations set forth
in the Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of these changes,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum and the Final Analysis
Memoranda.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memoranda,
``Final Determination Analysis for Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.,'' and
``Final Determination Analysis for Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari
T.A.S.,'' both dated concurrently with this determination and hereby
adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
determined a countervailable subsidy rate for each individually
investigated exporters/producers of the subject merchandise (i.e.,
Erdemir and Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.). Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the
Act states that for companies not individually investigated, we will
determine an ``all others'' rate equal to the weighted average of the
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any de minimis countervailable
subsidy rates and rates determined entirely by adverse facts available.
In this investigation, the only non-de minimis rate is the rate
calculated for Erdemir. Consequently, the rate calculated for Erdemir
is assigned as the ``all others'' rate.
We determine the estimated net countervailable subsidy rates are as
follows.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company Subsidy rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S................. 0.34 percent (de minimis).
Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S... 6.01 percent ad valorem.
All-Others................................ 6.01 percent ad valorem.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding the
calculations performed for this final determination within five days of
the date of public announcement of our final determination, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Suspension of Liquidation
Because the Preliminary Determination was negative, we did not
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend entries of
subject merchandise. In accordance with sections 705(c)(1)(C) of the
Act, we are now directing CBP to suspend liquidation of and to require
the posting of a cash deposit on all imports of the subject merchandise
from Turkey, other than those produced and exported by Colakoglu Dis
Ticaret A.S. because its rate is de minimis, that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
[[Page 53435]]
consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. The suspension of liquidation will remain in effect
until further notice. In addition, pursuant to section 705(c)(1)(B)(ii)
of the Act, we are directing CBP to require a cash deposit for such
entries of merchandise in the amount indicated above.
As our final determination is affirmative and our preliminary
determination was negative, in accordance with section 705(b)(3) of the
Act, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will determine
within 75 days whether the domestic industry in the United States is
materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of
imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of the
subject merchandise. We will issue a CVD order if the ITC issues a
final affirmative injury determination. If the ITC determines that
material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this
proceeding will be terminated and all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or canceled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the
ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this
investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and
business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC
confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or
under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written
consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination,
this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation that is subject to sanction.
This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: August 4, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain hot-
rolled, flat-rolled steel products, with or without patterns in
relief, and whether or not annealed, painted, varnished, or coated
with plastics or other non-metallic substances. The products covered
do not include those that are clad, plated, or coated with metal.
The products covered include coils that have a width or other
lateral measurement (``width'') of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of
thickness, and regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight
lengths) of a thickness of less than 4.75 mm and a width that is
12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the
thickness. The products described above may be rectangular, square,
circular, or other shape and include products of either rectangular
or non-rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieve
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness
requirements referenced above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions
set forth above unless the resulting measurement makes the product
covered by the existing antidumping \7\ or countervailing duty \8\
orders on Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products
From the Republic of Korea (A-580-836; C-580-837), and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Notice of Amendment of Final Determinations of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To-Length
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From France, India, Indonesia,
Italy, Japan and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585 (February 10,
2000).
\8\ Notice of Amended Final Determinations: Certain Cut-to-
Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India and the Republic of
Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To-
Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From France, India, Indonesia,
Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape,
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are
products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or
less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds
the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:
2.50 percent of manganese, or
3.30 percent of silicon, or
1.50 percent of copper, or
1.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
2.00 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.30 percent of vanadium, or
0.30 percent of zirconium.
Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this
scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium.
For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-
free (IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, the
substrate for motor lamination steels, Advanced High Strength Steels
(AHSS), and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS). IF steels are
recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of
elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon
and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with
micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium,
titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor
lamination steels contains micro-alloying levels of elements such as
silicon and aluminum. AHSS and UHSS are considered high tensile
strength and high elongation steels, although AHSS and UHSS are
covered whether or not they are high tensile strength or high
elongation steels.
Subject merchandise includes hot-rolled steel that has been
further processed in a third country, including but not limited to
pickling, oiling, levelling, annealing, tempering, temper rolling,
skin passing, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching,
and/or slitting, or any other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if
performed in the country of manufacture of the hot-rolled steel.
All products that meet the written physical description, and in
which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
element levels listed above, are within the scope of this
investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products
are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this
investigation:
Universal mill plates (i.e., hot-rolled, flat-rolled
products not in coils that have been rolled on four faces or in a
closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250
mm, of a thickness not less than 4.0 mm, and without patterns in
relief);
Products that have been cold-rolled (cold-reduced)
after hot-rolling; \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For purposes of this scope exclusion, rolling operations
such as a skin pass, levelling, temper rolling or other minor
rolling operations after the hot-rolling process for purposes of
surface finish, flatness, shape control, or gauge control do not
constitute cold-rolling sufficient to meet this exclusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball bearing steels; \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which contain, in
addition to iron, each of the following elements by weight in the
amount specified: (i) Not less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent
of carbon; (ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent of
manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03 percent of sulfur; (iv)
none, or not more than 0.03 percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than
0.18 nor more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than 1.25
nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii) none, or not more than
0.28 percent of nickel; (viii) none, or not more than 0.38 percent
of copper; and (ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of
molybdenum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53436]]
Tool steels; \11\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Tool steels are defined as steels which contain the
following combinations of elements in the quantity by weight
respectively indicated: (i) More than 1.2 percent carbon and more
than 10.5 percent chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon
and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent chromium; or
(iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon and 1 percent to 1.8
percent, inclusive, manganese; or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent,
inclusive, chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive,
molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less
than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi) not less than 0.5 percent
carbon and not less than 5.5 percent tungsten.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silico-manganese steels; \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels containing by
weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or
more but not more than 1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6
percent or more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products subject to this investigation are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7208.10.1500, 7208.10.3000,
7208.10.6000, 7208.25.3000, 7208.25.6000, 7208.26.0030,
7208.26.0060, 7208.27.0030, 7208.27.0060, 7208.36.0030,
7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 7208.37.0060, 7208.38.0015,
7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090, 7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030,
7208.39.0090, 7208.40.6030, 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000,
7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7211.14.0030,
7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000,
7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560,
7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.30.3050,
7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000,
7226.11.9030, 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and 7226.91.8000. The products subject
to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS
numbers: 7210.90.9000, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090,
7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075, 7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000,
7226.99.0180, and 7228.60.6000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection purposes only. The written
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
VIII. Analysis of Programs
IX. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Changes in the Ownership (CIO) of Erdemir's
Affiliates Resulted in Countervailable Subsidies to Erdemir
Comment 2: Whether the Government of Turkey's (GOT's) Sale of
Erdemir to OYAK Resulted in a Privatization that Extinguished the
Benefits of Prior Subsidies to Erdemir
Comment 3: Export Sales Denominator for COTAS and Colakoglu
Metalurji
Comment 4: COTAS's Rediscount Program Benchmark
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Correct Certain Errors
in Erdemir's Preliminary Calculations
X. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-19379 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P