Information on Current and Future States of Cybersecurity in the Digital Economy, 52827-52829 [2016-18948]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
52827
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
On July 6, 2016, the Court affirmed
the AR2 Final Remand, finding that the
Department had properly reconsidered
the AR2 Amended Final Results and
applied total AFA in light of the nature
of Koehler’s conduct.11 In addition,
although the Court found that the rate
of 75.36 percent was not properly
corroborated by the highest transactionspecific margin on the record of the
second review, it found that, under the
circumstances, the Department was
within its discretion in relying on the
75.36 percent rate, the highest rate in
any previous segment of the
proceeding.12 Thus, the Court affirmed
the AFA rate of 75.36 percent as applied
to Koehler.13
Timken Notice
Consistent with its decision in
Timken,14 as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades 15 the Federal Circuit held
that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department must publish a notice of
a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. On July 6,
2016, the CIT sustained the
Department’s final results of
redetermination pursuant to remand in
Koehler.16 The CIT’s judgment in
Koehler sustaining the AR2 Final
Remand constitutes a final decision of
that court that is not in harmony with
the AR2 Amended Final Results. This
notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, the Department will
continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending the
expiration of the period of appeal, or if
appealed, pending a final and
conclusive court decision.
Second Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, we are amending the AR2
Amended Final Results with respect to
the rate assigned to Koehler as follows:
Company
AR2 amended
final results
dumping
margin
Papierfabrik August Koehler AG .............................................................................................................................
4.33 percent ...
In the event the CIT’s July 6, 2016,
decision in Koehler is not appealed, or
is upheld by a final and conclusive
court decision, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to assess antidumping duties
on unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise based on the revised rate
listed above.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Cash Deposit Requirements
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
As a result of the determination by the
International Trade Commission that
revocation of the Order would not be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the
Department revoked the Order, effective
November 24, 2013, and stopped
collecting cash deposits under the
Order.17 Therefore, the cash deposit
requirement for Koehler will not be
changed as a result of these amended
final results.
Notification to Interested Parties
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
11 See Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United
States, Consol. Court No. 12–00091, Slip Op. 16–
67 (July 6, 2016) (Koehler) at 13–24.
12 Id., at 33 (‘‘The court declines to construe the
corroboration requirement so as to eliminate the
discretion Commerce must possess to confront the
serious misconduct it encountered in this case, in
which Koehler undermined the integrity of the
proceeding Commerce conducted and prevented
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Aug 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–19008 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket Number: 160725650–6650–01]
Information on Current and Future
States of Cybersecurity in the Digital
Economy
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; Request for Information
(RFI).
AGENCY:
The Commission on
Enhancing National Cybersecurity
requests information about current and
future states of cybersecurity in the
digital economy. As directed by
Executive Order 13718, ‘‘Commission
on Enhancing National Cybersecurity’’
(the ‘‘Executive Order’’), the
Commission will make detailed
SUMMARY:
Commerce from fulfilling its statutory
responsibility.’’).
13 Id., at 34.
14 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
15 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Second
amended
final results
dumping
margin
75.36
recommendations to strengthen
cybersecurity in both the public and
private sectors while protecting privacy,
ensuring public safety and economic
and national security, fostering
discovery and development of new
technical solutions, and bolstering
partnerships between Federal, State and
local government and the private sector
in the development, promotion, and use
of cybersecurity technologies, policies,
and best practices. The Secretary of
Commerce was tasked by the Exective
Order to direct the Director of the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to provide the
Commission with such expertise,
services, funds, facilities, staff,
equipment, and other support services
as may be necessary to carry out its
mission.
Responses to this RFI—which will be
posted at https://www.nist.gov/
cybercommission—will inform the
Commission as it develops its detailed
recommendations.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5:00 p.m. Eastern time on September 9,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by mail to Nakia Grayson,
National Institute of Standards and
16 See
Koehler at 13–24, and 34.
Lightweight Thermal Paper From the
People’s Republic of China and Germany:
Continuation of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders on the People’s
Republic of China, Revocation of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Germany, 80 FR 5083, 5084 (January
30, 2015).
17 See
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
52828
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop
2000, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Online
submissions in electronic form may be
sent to cybercommission@nist.gov in
any of the following formats: HTML;
ASCII; Word; RTF; or PDF. Please
submit comments only and include your
name, organization’s name (if any), and
cite ‘‘Input to the Commission on
Enhancing National Cybersecurity’’ in
all correspondence. Comments
containing references, studies, research,
and other empirical data that are not
widely published should include copies
of the referenced materials.
All comments received in response to
this RFI will be posted at https://
www.nist.gov/cybercommission without
change or redaction, so commenters
should not include information they do
not wish to be posted (e.g., personal or
confidential business information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this RFI contact: Kevin
Stine, National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899, telephone
(301) 975–4483, or
cybercommission@nist.gov. Please direct
media inquiries to NIST’s Office of
Public Affairs at (301) 975–2762.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
digital economy has been a driver of
innovation and productivity for several
decades. The Internet is used every day
by individuals, businesses, and
government to make purchases, store
sensitive data, and provide critical
information services. These services and
infrastructure have come under attack in
recent years in the form of identity and
intellectual property theft, deliberate
and unintentional service disruption,
and stolen data. Steps must be taken to
enhance existing efforts to increase the
protection and resilience of the digital
ecosystem, while maintaining a cyber
environment that encourages efficiency,
innovation, and economic prosperity.
In order to enhance cybersecurity
awareness and protections at all levels
of Government, business, and society, to
protect privacy, to ensure public safety
and economic and national security,
and to empower Americans to take
better control of their digital security,
the President issued Executive Order
13718,1 Commission on Enhancing
National Cybersecurity, in February
2016.
The Commission will make detailed
recommendations to strengthen
cybersecurity in both the public and
private sectors, while protecting
privacy, ensuring public safety and
1 Exec. Order No. 13718, Commission on
Enhancing National Cybersecurity, 81 FR 7441
(February 9, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Aug 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
economic and national security,
fostering discovery and development of
new technical solutions, and bolstering
partnerships between Federal, State,
and local government and the private
sector in the development, promotion,
and use of cybersecurity technologies,
policies, and best practices. According
to the Executive Order, the
Commission’s recommendations should
address actions that can be taken over
the next decade to accomplish these
goals.
The Secretary of Commerce was
tasked by the Executive Order to direct
the Director of NIST to provide the
Commission with such expertise,
services, funds, facilities, staff,
equipment, and other support services
as may be necessary to carry out its
mission.
To accomplish its mission, the
Commission shall, among other
approaches, reference and, as
appropriate, build on successful existing
cybersecurity policies, public-private
partnerships, and other initiatives;
consult with cybersecurity, national
security and law enforcement, privacy,
management, technology, and digital
economy experts in the public and
private sectors; and seek input from
those who have experienced significant
cybersecurity incidents to understand
lessons learned from these experiences,
including identifying any barriers to
awareness, risk management, and
investment. The Commission seeks
broad input from individuals and
organizations of all sizes and their
representatives from sector and
professional associations. The
Commission also invites submissions
from Federal agencies, state, local,
territorial and tribal governments,
standard-setting organizations, other
members of industry, consumers,
solution providers, and other
stakeholders.
Request for Information
The following questions cover the
major areas about which the
Commission seeks comment. They are
not intended to limit the topics that may
be addressed. Responses may include
information related to or
recommendations for other areas the
Commission should consider.
Comments containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published
should include copies of the referenced
materials. Do not include in comments
or otherwise submit proprietary or
confidential information, as all
comments received in response to this
RFI will be made available publically at
https://www.nist.gov/cybercommission.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Commission requests that each
comment contain an Executive
Summary, that is no more than one page
in length, which identifies the topic
addressed, the challenges, and the
proposed solution, recommendation,
and/or finding.
Based on the Executive Order and the
Commission’s initial deliberations, the
Commission is seeking information on
the following topics:
• Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
• Cybersecurity Insurance
• Cybersecurity Research and
Development
• Cybersecurity Workforce
• Federal Governance
• Identity and Access Management
• International Markets
• Internet of Things
• Public Awareness and Education
• State and Local Government
Cybersecurity
For each topic area, the Commission
solicits information on current and
future challenges, promising and
innovative approaches to address those
challenges, recommendations, and
references to inform the work of the
Commission. The Commission is
specifically seeking input on the topic
areas below:
Topic Area Challenges and Approaches
1. Current and future trends and
challenges in the selected topic area;
2. Progress being made to address the
challenges;
3. The most promising approaches to
addressing the challenges;
4. What can or should be done now
or within the next 1–2 years to better
address the challenges;
5. What should be done over the next
decade to better address the challenges;
and
6. Future challenges that may arise
and recommended actions that
individuals, organizations, and
governments can take to best position
themselves today to meet those
challenges.
The Commission also seeks input on
the following:
1. Emerging technology trends and
innovations; the effect these technology
trends and innovations will have on the
digital economy; and the effect these
technology trends and innovations will
have on cybersecurity.
2. Economic and other incentives for
enhancing cybersecurity.
3. Government-private sector
coordination and cooperation on
cybersecurity.
4. The role(s) of the government in
enhancing cybersecurity for the private
sector.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
5. Performance measures for nationallevel cybersecurity policies; and related
near-term and long-term goals.
6. Complexity of cybersecurity
terminology and potential approaches to
resolve, including common lexicons.
Kevin Kimball,
NIST Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2016–18948 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE759
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic;
Exempted Fishing Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of an
application for an exempted fishing
permit; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the receipt
of an application for an exempted
fishing permit (EFP) from Dr. David Die
and Chiara Pacini at the University of
Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and
Atmospheric Science. If granted, the
EFP would authorize the collection of a
maximum of 400 juvenile snowy
grouper incidentally caught in
commercial spiny lobster traps in
Federal waters off the Florida Keys in
the South Atlantic during the 2016–
2017 and 2017–2018 commercial lobster
fishing seasons. The purpose of the EFP
would be to estimate and validate age
and growth rates for juvenile snowy
grouper in the South Atlantic.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than September 9, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the application by either of the
following methods:
• Email: mary.vara@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the email
comment the following document
identifier: ‘‘University of Miami Snowy
Grouper EFP’’.
• Mail: Mary Vara, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
The application and related
documents are available for review
upon written request to any of the above
addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Vara, 727–824–5305; email
mary.vara@noaa.gov.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Aug 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
The EFP is
requested under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C 1801 et seq.), and regulations at
50 CFR 600.745(b) concerning exempted
fishing.
The EFP request involves activities
covered by regulations implementing
the Fishery Management Plans (FMP)
for federally managed fisheries of the
South Atlantic Region. The proposed
collection for scientific research
involves activities that would otherwise
be prohibited by regulations at 50 CFR
part 622, as they pertain to South
Atlantic snapper-grouper managed by
the South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council). The EFP would
exempt this research activity from
Federal regulations at § 622.170(a)(1)
(Permits and endorsements) and other
requirements applicable to snappergrouper permit holders; § 622.183(b)(8)
(Seasonal closures); § 622.187(b)(2)(ii)
(Bag and possession limits); and
§ 622.188(a), (b), and (c) (Required gear,
authorized gear, and unauthorized gear);
§ 622.193(b)(2) (Annual catch limits,
annual catch targets, and accountability
measures). The purpose of this study is
to estimate and validate age and growth
rates of juvenile snowy grouper to better
understand its early life history.
The applicant requests authorization
to collect juvenile snowy grouper
incidentally caught using standard
commercial spiny lobster traps in
Federal waters off the Florida Keys in
the South Atlantic, bounded by Bahia
Honda to the south and Upper
Matecumbe Key to the north.
As described in the application,
snowy grouper sampling would occur
during approximately 15 spiny lobster
trips completed during the 2016–2017
and 2017–2018 commercial spiny
lobster fishing seasons. These seasons
are from August 6, 2016, through March
31, 2017, and August 6, 2017, through
March 31, 2018. Approximately 200
spiny lobster traps would be deployed
or retrieved during each commercial
spiny lobster trip. A maximum of 200
incidentally caught snowy grouper
would be collected each year of the 2season project duration, for a maximum
quantity of 400 snowy grouper. The
project would end when either 400
snowy grouper are collected over the 2
spiny lobster seasons or by March 31,
2018, whichever occurs first.
Gear used for collecting the snowy
grouper would be legal commercial
spiny lobster traps constructed of wire
with wooden tops that are anchored
down with concrete slabs to prevent
them from moving during storm winds
and heavy currents. The traps are
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52829
standard spiny lobster traps with
dimensions of 35.0 inches (88.9 cm)
long, 23.6 inches (59.9 cm) wide, and
23.6 inches (59.9 cm) high. The spiny
lobster traps being deployed would be a
mix of single traps and trawls (traps
tethered together). Each trawl would
have approximately 15–25 traps
connected together with approximately
50–75 yd (46–69 m) of rope between
each trap with buoys on each end. Each
trap or trawl would also have a vertical
line and a buoy attached, along with the
vessel identification and permit number
etched into the buoy. Single traps would
be set in sand in shallow waters less
than 75 ft (23 m), and trawls would be
set in sand in deeper waters between
100–300 ft (30–91 m). The exact depth
and location of the traps or trawls
would be recorded after each
deployment. Traps would be baited
with raw cowhide and dead fish, and
would be re-baited and checked
approximately every 2 weeks,
depending on weather.
The trap soak time would be
approximately 2 weeks. All traps would
be retrieved during daylight hours. On
retrieval, traps would be hauled slowly
to the surface to minimize the risk of
barotrauma. Each trap would then be
checked for the presence of snowy
grouper. If there are snowy grouper
present, the trap number, location,
depth, length, and date would be
documented. Snowy grouper that are
longer than 209 mm total length would
be released because this study would
focus on juvenile snowy grouper. Any
other fish collected in the spiny lobster
traps would be returned to the water.
Before release, fish showing evidence of
barotrauma, including snowy grouper
longer than 209 mm total length and any
other finfish bycatch, would be vented
before release. Release cages (or
descending devices) would be utilized
to aid in fish descent. Lawfully
harvested spiny lobster would be
retained by the permitted vessel.
A maximum of 20 of the 200 snowy
grouper collected each year of the
project would be kept alive in an
aerated tank and taken to the University
of Miami for further study (for a
maximum of 30 days) to validate daily
growth rings on otoliths (fish ear bones).
The remaining snowy grouper will not
be kept alive on the boat, but will be
taken to the lab where their otoliths
would be removed to estimate age and
growth rates. Gut contents from all
snowy grouper that are not kept alive for
further study would be removed for
future analysis. In addition, any bycatch
from the spiny lobster traps would be
documented before being returned to
the water. In this study, bycatch would
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52827-52829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18948]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
[Docket Number: 160725650-6650-01]
Information on Current and Future States of Cybersecurity in the
Digital Economy
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department
of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; Request for Information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity requests
information about current and future states of cybersecurity in the
digital economy. As directed by Executive Order 13718, ``Commission on
Enhancing National Cybersecurity'' (the ``Executive Order''), the
Commission will make detailed recommendations to strengthen
cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors while protecting
privacy, ensuring public safety and economic and national security,
fostering discovery and development of new technical solutions, and
bolstering partnerships between Federal, State and local government and
the private sector in the development, promotion, and use of
cybersecurity technologies, policies, and best practices. The Secretary
of Commerce was tasked by the Exective Order to direct the Director of
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to provide
the Commission with such expertise, services, funds, facilities, staff,
equipment, and other support services as may be necessary to carry out
its mission.
Responses to this RFI--which will be posted at https://www.nist.gov/cybercommission--will inform the Commission as it develops its detailed
recommendations.
DATES: Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on September
9, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by mail to Nakia Grayson,
National Institute of Standards and
[[Page 52828]]
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2000, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Online
submissions in electronic form may be sent to cybercommission@nist.gov
in any of the following formats: HTML; ASCII; Word; RTF; or PDF. Please
submit comments only and include your name, organization's name (if
any), and cite ``Input to the Commission on Enhancing National
Cybersecurity'' in all correspondence. Comments containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical data that are not widely
published should include copies of the referenced materials.
All comments received in response to this RFI will be posted at
https://www.nist.gov/cybercommission without change or redaction, so
commenters should not include information they do not wish to be posted
(e.g., personal or confidential business information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this RFI contact:
Kevin Stine, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau
Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, telephone (301) 975-4483, or
cybercommission@nist.gov. Please direct media inquiries to NIST's
Office of Public Affairs at (301) 975-2762.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The digital economy has been a driver of
innovation and productivity for several decades. The Internet is used
every day by individuals, businesses, and government to make purchases,
store sensitive data, and provide critical information services. These
services and infrastructure have come under attack in recent years in
the form of identity and intellectual property theft, deliberate and
unintentional service disruption, and stolen data. Steps must be taken
to enhance existing efforts to increase the protection and resilience
of the digital ecosystem, while maintaining a cyber environment that
encourages efficiency, innovation, and economic prosperity.
In order to enhance cybersecurity awareness and protections at all
levels of Government, business, and society, to protect privacy, to
ensure public safety and economic and national security, and to empower
Americans to take better control of their digital security, the
President issued Executive Order 13718,\1\ Commission on Enhancing
National Cybersecurity, in February 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Exec. Order No. 13718, Commission on Enhancing National
Cybersecurity, 81 FR 7441 (February 9, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission will make detailed recommendations to strengthen
cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors, while protecting
privacy, ensuring public safety and economic and national security,
fostering discovery and development of new technical solutions, and
bolstering partnerships between Federal, State, and local government
and the private sector in the development, promotion, and use of
cybersecurity technologies, policies, and best practices. According to
the Executive Order, the Commission's recommendations should address
actions that can be taken over the next decade to accomplish these
goals.
The Secretary of Commerce was tasked by the Executive Order to
direct the Director of NIST to provide the Commission with such
expertise, services, funds, facilities, staff, equipment, and other
support services as may be necessary to carry out its mission.
To accomplish its mission, the Commission shall, among other
approaches, reference and, as appropriate, build on successful existing
cybersecurity policies, public-private partnerships, and other
initiatives; consult with cybersecurity, national security and law
enforcement, privacy, management, technology, and digital economy
experts in the public and private sectors; and seek input from those
who have experienced significant cybersecurity incidents to understand
lessons learned from these experiences, including identifying any
barriers to awareness, risk management, and investment. The Commission
seeks broad input from individuals and organizations of all sizes and
their representatives from sector and professional associations. The
Commission also invites submissions from Federal agencies, state,
local, territorial and tribal governments, standard-setting
organizations, other members of industry, consumers, solution
providers, and other stakeholders.
Request for Information
The following questions cover the major areas about which the
Commission seeks comment. They are not intended to limit the topics
that may be addressed. Responses may include information related to or
recommendations for other areas the Commission should consider.
Comments containing references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely published should include copies of
the referenced materials. Do not include in comments or otherwise
submit proprietary or confidential information, as all comments
received in response to this RFI will be made available publically at
https://www.nist.gov/cybercommission. The Commission requests that each
comment contain an Executive Summary, that is no more than one page in
length, which identifies the topic addressed, the challenges, and the
proposed solution, recommendation, and/or finding.
Based on the Executive Order and the Commission's initial
deliberations, the Commission is seeking information on the following
topics:
Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Insurance
Cybersecurity Research and Development
Cybersecurity Workforce
Federal Governance
Identity and Access Management
International Markets
Internet of Things
Public Awareness and Education
State and Local Government Cybersecurity
For each topic area, the Commission solicits information on current
and future challenges, promising and innovative approaches to address
those challenges, recommendations, and references to inform the work of
the Commission. The Commission is specifically seeking input on the
topic areas below:
Topic Area Challenges and Approaches
1. Current and future trends and challenges in the selected topic
area;
2. Progress being made to address the challenges;
3. The most promising approaches to addressing the challenges;
4. What can or should be done now or within the next 1-2 years to
better address the challenges;
5. What should be done over the next decade to better address the
challenges; and
6. Future challenges that may arise and recommended actions that
individuals, organizations, and governments can take to best position
themselves today to meet those challenges.
The Commission also seeks input on the following:
1. Emerging technology trends and innovations; the effect these
technology trends and innovations will have on the digital economy; and
the effect these technology trends and innovations will have on
cybersecurity.
2. Economic and other incentives for enhancing cybersecurity.
3. Government-private sector coordination and cooperation on
cybersecurity.
4. The role(s) of the government in enhancing cybersecurity for the
private sector.
[[Page 52829]]
5. Performance measures for national-level cybersecurity policies;
and related near-term and long-term goals.
6. Complexity of cybersecurity terminology and potential approaches
to resolve, including common lexicons.
Kevin Kimball,
NIST Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2016-18948 Filed 8-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
