Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 51855-51857 [2016-18649]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices
Dated: August 1, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Non-Market Economy Country Status
5. PRC-Wide Entity
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
[FR Doc. 2016–18669 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
51855
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for
September 2016
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in September
2016 and will appear in that month’s
Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset
Review (‘‘Sunset Review’’).
Department Contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from China (A–570–815) (4th Review) ..........................................
Sulfanilic Acid from India (A–533–806) (4th Review) ............................................
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–588–850)
(Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (3rd Review).
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–588–851)
(Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (3rd Review).
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–485–805)
(Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Romania (3rd Review).
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from India (C–533–807) (4th Review) ............................................
David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
Suspended Investigations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in
September 2016.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews provides further information
regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Aug 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: July 28, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016–18537 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
aluminum extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective August 5, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 26, 2011, the Department
published the notice of the antidumping
duty order on aluminum extrusions
from the PRC.1 On April 1, 2016, the
Department published the notice of
initiation of the first sunset review of
1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR
30650 (May 26, 2011) (AD Order).
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
51856
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices
the AD Order, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).2 On April 18, 2016, the
Department received a notice of intent
to participate in this review from the
Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade
Committee (Petitioner or Committee)
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Petitioner claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(29)(vii) as a coalition of U.S.
producers of the domestic like product,
and the individual Committee members
claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(29)(v) as U.S. producers of
the domestic like product. On May 2,
2016, the Department received a
complete substantive response from
Petitioner within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4
We received no substantive responses
from respondent interested parties with
respect to the AD Order. As a result,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
the Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the AD
Order.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is aluminum extrusions which are
shapes and forms, produced by an
extrusion process, made from aluminum
alloys having metallic elements
corresponding to the alloy series
designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).5
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
8424.90.9080, 9405.99.4020,
9031.90.90.95, 7616.10.90.90,
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 81
FR 18829 (April 1, 2016).
3 See Letter from Petitioner to the Department,
‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Intent to Participate in Review,’’
dated April 18, 2016.
4 See Letter from Petitioner to the Department,
‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic
of China: AEFTC’s Substantive Response to the
Department’s Notice of Initiation of its Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review,’’ dated May 2, 2016
(Substantive Response).
5 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) for a
complete description of the scope of the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Aug 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00,
7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91,
7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50,
7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00,
7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98,
8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00,
9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00,
7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10,
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30,
7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30,
7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00,
8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00,
8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15,
8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10,
8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45,
8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00,
8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45,
8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50,
8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00,
8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00,
8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00,
8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80,
8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00,
8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00,
8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00,
8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60,
8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00,
8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60,
8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60,
9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00,
9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40,
9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85,
9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80,
9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10,
9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05,
9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80,
9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10,
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05,
9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80,
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15,
9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41,
9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61,
9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00,
9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40,
9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10,
9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30,
9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20,
9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00,
9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80,
9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00,
9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00,
9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00,
9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as
parts of other aluminum products may
be classifiable under the following
additional Chapter 76 subheadings:
7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and
7616.99, as well as under other HTSUS
chapters. In addition, fin evaporator
coils may be classifiable under HTSUS
numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
AD Order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review, including the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping in the event of revocation
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the order were revoked, is
provided in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
Department determines that revocation
of the AD Order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail
would be weighted-average margins up
to 33.28 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
51857
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices
Dated: July 29, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–5255 and (202)
482–9179, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–18649 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–507–502]
Certain In-Shell (Raw) Pistachios From
the Islamic Republic of Iran: Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Effective August 5, 2016.
As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on
certain in-shell (raw) pistachios
(pistachios) from the Islamic Republic of
(Iran) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the rates identified in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES:
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Madeline
Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Offices VII
and VI, respectively, Enforcement and
Background
The Department published the
antidumping duty order on pistachios
from Iran on July 17, 1986.1 On April 1,
2016, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department initiated a sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
pistachios from Iran.2 On April 11,
2016, and April 13, 2016, the
Department received notices of intent to
participate from Wonderful Pistachios &
Almonds LLC (WP&A) and American
Pistachio Growers (APG), respectively
(collectively, the Domestic Interested
Parties), within the deadline specified
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The
Domestic Interested Parties are
manufacturers of a domestic like
product in the United States and,
accordingly, are domestic interested
parties pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of
the Act.
On April 29, 2016, and May 2, 2016,
the Department received an adequate
substantive response to the notice of
initiation from WP&A and APG,
respectively, within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department did not receive any
timely filed responses from the
respondent interested parties, i.e.,
pistachio producers and exporters from
Iran. The Department did receive an
untimely substantive response from
Tehran Negah Nima, trading as Nima
Trading Company (Nima). As this
response was untimely, the Department
rejected the submission.3 On the basis of
the notices of intent to participate and
adequate substantive responses filed by
the Domestic Interested Parties and the
inadequate response from any
respondent interested party, the
Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the order pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
raw,4 in-shell pistachio nuts from which
the hulls have been removed, leaving
the inner hard shells, and edible meats
from Iran. This merchandise is provided
for in subheading 0802.51.00.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memorandum 5 are the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins of
dumping likely to prevail if this order
was revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review, and the corresponding
recommendations, in the Decision
Memorandum which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit in room B8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://trade.gov/
enforcement/. The signed Decision
Memorandum and electronic versions of
the Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3)
of the Act, we determine that revocation
of the antidumping duty order of
pistachios from Iran would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at weighted average margins
up to the following:
Margin
(percent)
Exporter/producer
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Rafsanjan Pistachios Cooperative .......................................................................................................................................................
Tehran Negah Nima Trading Company, Inc./Maghsoudi Farms ........................................................................................................
Tehran Negah Nima Trading Company, Inc./Razi Domghan Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Company ...................................
All-Others Rate ....................................................................................................................................................................................
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Certain In-Shell
Pistachios from Iran, 51 FR 25922 (July 17, 1986)
(Iran Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 81
FR 18829 (April 1, 2016) (Sunset Initiation).
3 See the memorandum to the file from Madeline
Heeren entitled, ‘‘Request to Take Action on Certain
Barcodes,’’ dated May 17, 2016 (Rejection Memo);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Aug 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
see also letter from the Department to Nima, dated
May 17, 2016 (Rejection Letter).
4 See Certain In-Shell Pistachios From Iran;
Clarification of Scope in Antidumping Duty
Investigation, 51 FR 23254 (June 26, 1986).
5 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
241.14
241.14
241.14
241.14
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Counter
vailing Duty Operations, titled ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain In-Shell
(Raw) Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of Iran;
Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51855-51857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18649]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC) would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective August 5, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2657 or (202)
482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 26, 2011, the Department published the notice of the
antidumping duty order on aluminum extrusions from the PRC.\1\ On April
1, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation of the first
sunset review of
[[Page 51856]]
the AD Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).\2\ On April 18, 2016, the Department received a
notice of intent to participate in this review from the Aluminum
Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (Petitioner or Committee) within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ Petitioner claimed
interested party status under section 771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(29)(vii) as a coalition of U.S. producers of the domestic
like product, and the individual Committee members claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(29)(v) as U.S. producers of the domestic like product. On
May 2, 2016, the Department received a complete substantive response
from Petitioner within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ We received no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties with respect to the AD Order. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-
day) sunset review of the AD Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (AD Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 81 FR 18829
(April 1, 2016).
\3\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Department, ``Aluminum
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Intent to
Participate in Review,'' dated April 18, 2016.
\4\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Department, ``Aluminum
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: AEFTC's Substantive
Response to the Department's Notice of Initiation of its Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Review,'' dated May 2, 2016 (Substantive Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is aluminum extrusions which
are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results
of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) for a
complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS): 8424.90.9080, 9405.99.4020, 9031.90.90.95,
7616.10.90.90, 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30,
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70,
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94,
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00,
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60,
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30,
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10,
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45,
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15,
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55,
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50,
8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05,
8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40,
8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00,
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8515.90.20.00,
8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00,
8529.90.97.60, 8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80,
8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00,
9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50,
9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05,
9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10,
9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80,
9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10,
9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51,
9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00,
9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20,
9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30,
9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00,
9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00,
9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99, as well
as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60.
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this AD Order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this review,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in
the event of revocation and the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were revoked, is provided in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
the Department determines that revocation of the AD Order would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-
average margins up to 33.28 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19
CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
[[Page 51857]]
Dated: July 29, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-18649 Filed 8-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
