Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk Management Model Description Document and the ICC Risk Management Framework, 51532-51533 [2016-18475]
Download as PDF
51532
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 150 / Thursday, August 4, 2016 / Notices
12 and should be submitted on or before
August 25, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–18473 Filed 8–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78448; File No. SR–ICC–
2016–010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Revise the
ICC Risk Management Model
Description Document and the ICC
Risk Management Framework
July 29, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2
notice is hereby given that on July 15,
2016, ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by ICC.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The principal purpose of the
proposed rule change is to revise the
ICC Risk Management Framework to
incorporate certain risk model
enhancements. ICC also proposes minor
clarifying edits to the ICC Risk
Management Model Description
document and the ICC Risk
Management Framework. These
revisions do not require any changes to
the ICC Clearing Rules (‘‘Rules’’).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICC
included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Aug 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
in Item IV below. ICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
ICC proposes revising its risk
management framework to incorporate
risk model enhancements related to the
single name credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’)
liquidity charge methodology. ICC
believes such revisions will facilitate
the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and
derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions for which it is responsible.
The proposed revisions are described in
detail as follows.
ICC proposes a revised approach to
computing single name CDS liquidity
charges. Specifically, ICC proposes to
introduce minimum instrument
liquidity requirements independent of
instrument maturities. ICC’s current
approach features instrument liquidity
requirements that decay with time to
maturity for fixed credit spread levels.
The proposed approach introduces
minimum liquidity requirements for
individual instruments, independent of
time to maturity for the considered
instruments, and thus establishes
minimum liquidity charges that do not
decay over time as maturity is
approached. The revised calculation for
single name CDS liquidity charges at the
instrument level incorporates a pricebased bid-offer width floor component
to provide stability of requirements, as
well as a dynamic spread-based BOW
component to reflect the additional risk
associated with distressed market
conditions. The values of such pricebased BOW and spread-based BOW are
fixed factors, which are subject to at
least monthly reviews and updates by
ICC Risk Management Department with
consultation with the Risk Committee.
ICC also proposes enhancements to
the liquidity charge calculation at the
risk factor level. The current risk factor
level liquidity requirements are based
on forward CDS spread levels. Under
the revised calculation, liquidity
charges at the risk factor level are
computed by first calculating the
liquidity requirements for each
individual instrument position in the
portfolio, and then summing all
instrument liquidity requirements for
positions with the same directionality,
i.e., bought or sold protection. The risk
factor liquidity requirement is the
greatest liquidity requirement associated
with either the sum of all bought
protection position liquidity
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements, or the sum of all sold
protection position liquidity
requirements. There are no changes to
the liquidity charge calculation at the
portfolio level.
ICC expects these enhancements will
ensure more stable liquidity
requirements for instruments across the
curve. Further, the enhancements
simplify ICC’s liquidity charge
methodology, which promotes ease of
understanding. As stated above, the
current risk factor level liquidity
requirements are based on forward CDS
spread levels and are, in general, more
difficult to replicate due to the inherited
need for knowledge of spread levels
across the entire term structure
(‘‘curve’’). Additionally, to facilitate
replication of the enhanced liquidity
charge calculations, ICC will provide
end-of-day data for instruments in
which clients have open positions,
allowing for additional transparency
and easier replication for clients who
wish to estimate liquidity charges for
hypothetical and current positions.
ICC also proposes updating liquidity
scaling factors to reflect the
methodology enhancements. There is no
price based component under the
current methodology. To reflect the
introduction of a price based
component, the liquidity scaling factors
have been decomposed and adjusted in
order to maintain the same overall
composition with both price and spread
based components.
ICC also proposes minor clarifying
edits to the ICC Risk Management
Framework and the ICC Risk
Management Model Description
document. ICC added language to the
Overview section of the Risk
Management Framework to identify
which ICC documents provide
additional details regarding ICC’s risk
management approach. ICC added
language to the Governance and
Organization section of the Risk
Management Framework to note that the
reporting line of ICC’s Chief Risk Officer
to the Chairperson of the ICC Risk
Committee, who is also a non-executive
manager on the Board, allows the Chief
Risk Officer to bring any issues or
concerns directly to the Board without
intermediation by other ICC personnel.
ICC also made edits to the Governance
and Organization section of the Risk
Management Framework to revise the
list of documents reviewed by the Risk
Committee on at least an annual basis to
include the ICC End-of-Day Price
Discovery Policies and Procedures and
the ICC Operational Risk Management
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 150 / Thursday, August 4, 2016 / Notices
Framework.3 Finally, ICC added minor
clarifying details to the technical
calculation descriptions set forth in the
ICC Risk Management Model
Description document, specifically in
the Recovery Rate Sensitivity Risk
Analysis, Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk
Analysis, Spread Risk Analysis, and
Guaranty Fund Size Estimation sections.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 4
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions and to
comply with the provisions of the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder. ICC believes that the
proposed rule changes are consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to ICC, in particular, to
Section 17(A)(b)(3)(F),5 because ICC
believes that the proposed rule changes
will promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, derivatives agreements,
contracts, and transactions, as the
proposed changes provide clarity and
enhance risk policies, resulting in
enhanced stability and conservative bias
of requirements, and thereby facilitate
ICC’s ability to promptly and accurately
clear and settle its cleared CDS
contracts. In addition, the proposed
revisions are consistent with the
relevant requirements of Rule 17Ad–
22.6 In particular, the risk model
enhancements proposed in the Risk
Management Model Description
document will enhance the financial
resources available to the clearing house
by promoting stability and conservative
bias of requirements, and are therefore
reasonably designed to meet the margin
and financial resource requirements of
Rule 17Ad–22(b)(2–3).7 The risk model
enhancements will also result in a more
transparent and simplified liquidity
charge approach, and are therefore
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(d)(8).8
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
ICC does not believe the proposed
rule changes would have any impact, or
impose any burden, on competition.
3 Staff has confirmed this statement, corrected to
conform with the proposed revised Risk
Management Framework filed with the
Commission, with ICC via email on July 26, 2016.
4 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
5 Id.
6 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.
7 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2–3).
8 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Aug 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
The risk model enhancements and
clarifying changes apply uniformly
across all market participants.
Therefore, ICC does not believe the
proposed rule changes impose any
burden on competition that is
inappropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received by ICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ICC–2016–010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to
Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICC–2016–010. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51533
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE
Clear Credit’s Web site at https://
www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICC–2016–010 and should
be submitted on or before August 25,
2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–18475 Filed 8–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78444; File No. SR–BOX–
2016–37]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Detail
How Complex Orders Will Execute
Through the Facilitation Auction
Mechanism
July 29, 2016.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on July 26,
2016, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(‘‘BOX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 150 (Thursday, August 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51532-51533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78448; File No. SR-ICC-2016-010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk Management Model
Description Document and the ICC Risk Management Framework
July 29, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 15, 2016, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared primarily by ICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The principal purpose of the proposed rule change is to revise the
ICC Risk Management Framework to incorporate certain risk model
enhancements. ICC also proposes minor clarifying edits to the ICC Risk
Management Model Description document and the ICC Risk Management
Framework. These revisions do not require any changes to the ICC
Clearing Rules (``Rules'').
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
ICC proposes revising its risk management framework to incorporate
risk model enhancements related to the single name credit default swap
(``CDS'') liquidity charge methodology. ICC believes such revisions
will facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions for which it is responsible. The proposed revisions are
described in detail as follows.
ICC proposes a revised approach to computing single name CDS
liquidity charges. Specifically, ICC proposes to introduce minimum
instrument liquidity requirements independent of instrument maturities.
ICC's current approach features instrument liquidity requirements that
decay with time to maturity for fixed credit spread levels. The
proposed approach introduces minimum liquidity requirements for
individual instruments, independent of time to maturity for the
considered instruments, and thus establishes minimum liquidity charges
that do not decay over time as maturity is approached. The revised
calculation for single name CDS liquidity charges at the instrument
level incorporates a price-based bid-offer width floor component to
provide stability of requirements, as well as a dynamic spread-based
BOW component to reflect the additional risk associated with distressed
market conditions. The values of such price-based BOW and spread-based
BOW are fixed factors, which are subject to at least monthly reviews
and updates by ICC Risk Management Department with consultation with
the Risk Committee.
ICC also proposes enhancements to the liquidity charge calculation
at the risk factor level. The current risk factor level liquidity
requirements are based on forward CDS spread levels. Under the revised
calculation, liquidity charges at the risk factor level are computed by
first calculating the liquidity requirements for each individual
instrument position in the portfolio, and then summing all instrument
liquidity requirements for positions with the same directionality,
i.e., bought or sold protection. The risk factor liquidity requirement
is the greatest liquidity requirement associated with either the sum of
all bought protection position liquidity requirements, or the sum of
all sold protection position liquidity requirements. There are no
changes to the liquidity charge calculation at the portfolio level.
ICC expects these enhancements will ensure more stable liquidity
requirements for instruments across the curve. Further, the
enhancements simplify ICC's liquidity charge methodology, which
promotes ease of understanding. As stated above, the current risk
factor level liquidity requirements are based on forward CDS spread
levels and are, in general, more difficult to replicate due to the
inherited need for knowledge of spread levels across the entire term
structure (``curve''). Additionally, to facilitate replication of the
enhanced liquidity charge calculations, ICC will provide end-of-day
data for instruments in which clients have open positions, allowing for
additional transparency and easier replication for clients who wish to
estimate liquidity charges for hypothetical and current positions.
ICC also proposes updating liquidity scaling factors to reflect the
methodology enhancements. There is no price based component under the
current methodology. To reflect the introduction of a price based
component, the liquidity scaling factors have been decomposed and
adjusted in order to maintain the same overall composition with both
price and spread based components.
ICC also proposes minor clarifying edits to the ICC Risk Management
Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description document. ICC
added language to the Overview section of the Risk Management Framework
to identify which ICC documents provide additional details regarding
ICC's risk management approach. ICC added language to the Governance
and Organization section of the Risk Management Framework to note that
the reporting line of ICC's Chief Risk Officer to the Chairperson of
the ICC Risk Committee, who is also a non-executive manager on the
Board, allows the Chief Risk Officer to bring any issues or concerns
directly to the Board without intermediation by other ICC personnel.
ICC also made edits to the Governance and Organization section of the
Risk Management Framework to revise the list of documents reviewed by
the Risk Committee on at least an annual basis to include the ICC End-
of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures and the ICC Operational
Risk Management
[[Page 51533]]
Framework.\3\ Finally, ICC added minor clarifying details to the
technical calculation descriptions set forth in the ICC Risk Management
Model Description document, specifically in the Recovery Rate
Sensitivity Risk Analysis, Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk Analysis,
Spread Risk Analysis, and Guaranty Fund Size Estimation sections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Staff has confirmed this statement, corrected to conform
with the proposed revised Risk Management Framework filed with the
Commission, with ICC via email on July 26, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \4\ requires, among other things,
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and,
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions and to comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder. ICC believes that the proposed rule changes
are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to ICC, in particular, to Section
17(A)(b)(3)(F),\5\ because ICC believes that the proposed rule changes
will promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and
transactions, as the proposed changes provide clarity and enhance risk
policies, resulting in enhanced stability and conservative bias of
requirements, and thereby facilitate ICC's ability to promptly and
accurately clear and settle its cleared CDS contracts. In addition, the
proposed revisions are consistent with the relevant requirements of
Rule 17Ad-22.\6\ In particular, the risk model enhancements proposed in
the Risk Management Model Description document will enhance the
financial resources available to the clearing house by promoting
stability and conservative bias of requirements, and are therefore
reasonably designed to meet the margin and financial resource
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2-3).\7\ The risk model enhancements
will also result in a more transparent and simplified liquidity charge
approach, and are therefore consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad-22(d)(8).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\5\ Id.
\6\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\7\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2-3).
\8\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
ICC does not believe the proposed rule changes would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The risk model
enhancements and clarifying changes apply uniformly across all market
participants. Therefore, ICC does not believe the proposed rule changes
impose any burden on competition that is inappropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by ICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ICC-2016-010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2016-010. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit
and on ICE Clear Credit's Web site at https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2016-010
and should be submitted on or before August 25, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-18475 Filed 8-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P