Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 49934-49935 [2016-18018]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
49934
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
scope of the investigation if performed in the
country of manufacture of the cold-rolled
steel.
All products that meet the written physical
description, and in which the chemistry
quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
element levels listed above, are within the
scope of this investigation unless specifically
excluded. The following products are outside
of and/or specifically excluded from the
scope of this investigation:
• Ball bearing steels; 1
• Tool steels; 2
• Silico-manganese steel; 3
• Grain-oriented electrical steels (GOES) as
defined in the final determination of the U.S.
Department of Commerce in Grain-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Germany, Japan, and
Poland.4
• Non-Oriented Electrical Steels (NOES),
as defined in the antidumping orders issued
by the U.S. Department of Commerce in NonOriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.5
1 Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which
contain, in addition to iron, each of the following
elements by weight in the amount specified: (i) Not
less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent of carbon;
(ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent
of manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of sulfur; (iv) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than 0.18 nor
more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than
1.25 nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii)
none, or not more than 0.28 percent of nickel; (viii)
none, or not more than 0.38 percent of copper; and
(ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of
molybdenum.
2 Tool steels are defined as steels which contain
the following combinations of elements in the
quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) More
than 1.2 percent carbon and more than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon
and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon
and 1 percent to 1.8 percent, inclusive, manganese;
or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent, inclusive,
chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive,
molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon
and not less than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi)
not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less than
5.5 percent tungsten.
3 Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels
containing by weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent
of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or more but not more than
1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6 percent or
more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon.
4 Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel From Germany,
Japan, and Poland: Final Determinations of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Certain Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR
42501, 42503 (Dep’t of Commerce, July 22, 2014).
This determination defines grain-oriented electrical
steel as ‘‘a flat-rolled alloy steel product containing
by weight at least 0.6 percent but not more than 6
percent of silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of
carbon, not more than 1.0 percent of aluminum, and
no other element in an amount that would give the
steel the characteristics of another alloy steel, in
coils or in straight lengths.’’
5 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 71741, 71741–42 (Dep’t of
Commerce, Dec. 3, 2014). The orders define NOES
as ‘‘cold-rolled, flat-rolled, alloy steel products,
whether or not in coils, regardless of width, having
an actual thickness of 0.20 mm or more, in which
the core loss is substantially equal in any direction
of magnetization in the plane of the material. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jul 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
The products subject to this investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7209.15.0000,
7209.16.0030, 7209.16.0060, 7209.16.0070,
7209.16.0091, 7209.17.0030, 7209.17.0060,
7209.17.0070, 7209.17.0091, 7209.18.1530,
7209.18.1560, 7209.18.2510, 7209.18.2520,
7209.18.2580, 7209.18.6020, 7209.18.6090,
7209.25.0000, 7209.26.0000, 7209.27.0000,
7209.28.0000, 7209.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7211.23.1500, 7211.23.2000, 7211.23.3000,
7211.23.4500, 7211.23.6030, 7211.23.6060,
7211.23.6090, 7211.29.2030, 7211.29.2090,
7211.29.4500, 7211.29.6030, 7211.29.6080,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7225.50.6000, 7225.50.8080, 7225.99.0090,
7226.92.5000, 7226.92.7050, and
7226.92.8050. The products subject to the
investigation may also enter under the
following HTSUS numbers: 7210.90.9000,
7212.50.0000, 7215.10.0010, 7215.10.0080,
7215.50.0016, 7215.50.0018, 7215.50.0020,
7215.50.0061, 7215.50.0063, 7215.50.0065,
7215.50.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7217.10.1000,
7217.10.2000, 7217.10.3000, 7217.10.7000,
7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060,
7217.90.5090, 7225.19.0000, 7226.19.1000,
7226.19.9000, 7226.99.0180, 7228.50.5015,
7228.50.5040, 7228.50.5070, 7228.60.8000,
and 7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and U.S. Customs
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–17948 Filed 7–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, et al.;
Notice of Consolidated Decision on
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of
Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC.
Docket Number: 15–047. Applicant:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,
term ‘substantially equal’ means that the cross grain
direction of core loss is no more than 1.5 times the
straight grain direction (i.e., the rolling direction) of
core loss. NOES has a magnetic permeability that
does not exceed 1.65 Tesla when tested at a field
of 800 A/m (equivalent to 10 Oersteds) along (i.e.,
parallel to) the rolling direction of the sheet (i.e.,
B800 value). NOES contains by weight more than
1.00 percent of silicon but less than 3.5 percent of
silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon, and
not more than 1.5 percent of aluminum. NOES has
a surface oxide coating, to which an insulation
coating may be applied.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
MA 02210. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 81 FR
11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15–051. Applicant:
Iowa State University of Science and
Technology, Ames, IA 50011–3020.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech
Republic and Great Britain. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724, May 24,
2016.
Docket Number: 15–054. Applicant:
University of Connecticut Health
Center, Farmington, CT 06030.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 81
FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15–056. Applicant:
St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital,
Memphis, TN 38105. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 11517, March
4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15–059. Applicant:
Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
00854. Instrument: Low Temperature
Scanning Tunneling Microscope.
Manufacturer: Unisoku, Japan. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 11517, March
4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15–060. Applicant:
Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
81 FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 16–003. Applicant:
Oregon Health and Science University,
Portland, OR 97239. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724–25, May
24, 2016.
Docket Number: 16–006. Applicant:
Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, TX 75390. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724–25, May
24, 2016.
Docket Number: 16–009. Applicant:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
94305–5126. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724, May 24,
2016.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as this
instrument is intended to be used, is
being manufactured in the United States
at the time the instrument was ordered.
Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an
electron microscope and is intended for
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2016 / Notices
research or scientific educational uses
requiring an electron microscope. We
know of no electron microscope, or any
other instrument suited to these
purposes, which was being
manufactured in the United States at the
time of order of each instrument.
Dated: July 22, 2016.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–18018 Filed 7–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–821–823]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Russian Federation: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Final Negative
Critical Circumstances Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain cold-rolled steel flat products
(cold-rolled steel) from the Russian
Federation (Russia). For information on
the estimated subsidy rates, see the
‘‘Final Determination’’ section of this
notice. The period of investigation (POI)
is January 1, 2014, through December
31, 2014.
DATES: Effective July 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristen Johnson (the NLMK Companies)
and Stephanie Moore (the Severstal
Companies), AD/CVD Operations, Office
III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4793 and (202) 482–3692,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Determination on December
22, 2015.1 On July 1, 2016, the
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination, Preliminary Negative Critical
Circumstances Determination, and Alignment of
Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 80 FR 79564 (December 22, 2015)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jul 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
Department issued a Post-Preliminary
Decision Memorandum with respect to
the Provision of Mining Rights for Less
Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR)
program.2 A complete summary of the
events that occurred since the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a
full discussion of the issues raised by
parties for this final determination, may
be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.3 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Final
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are cold-rolled steel flat
products from Russia. For a complete
description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation,’’ in Appendix II of this
notice.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preliminary
Scope Determination,4 the Department
set aside a period of time for parties to
address the scope issues in case briefs
2 See Memorandum To Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, titled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Post-Preliminary Analysis of Program Which
Required More Information at the Preliminary
Determination: Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the
Russian Federation,’’ dated July 1, 2016 (PostPreliminary Decision Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the
Russian Federation: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
4 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain ColdRolled Steel Products from Brazil, the People’s
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United
Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated
February 29, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49935
or other written comments on scope
issues.
For a summary of the product
coverage comments and rebuttal
responses submitted to the records of
the cold-rolled steel investigations, and
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.5
The Final Scope Decision Memorandum
is incorporated by, and hereby adopted
by, this notice.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues that parties raised, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is attached
to this notice at Appendix I.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
In making this final determination,
the Department relied, in part, on facts
available with regard to specificity of
the Provision of Natural Gas for LTAR,
to specificity of the Provision of Mining
Rights for LTAR program, and to the
Severstal Companies’ use of the Tax
Deduction for Exploration Expenses.
Because neither the Government of
Russia nor the Severstal Companies
acted to the best of their ability in
responding to the Department’s requests
for certain information, we drew an
adverse inference where appropriate in
selecting from among the facts
otherwise available.6 For further
information, see the section ‘‘Use of
Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse
Inferences’’ in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from parties and the
minor corrections presented, and
additional items discovered at
verification, we made certain changes to
the respondents’ subsidy rate
calculations. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
5 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain ColdRolled Steel Products from Brazil, the People’s
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United
Kingdom: ‘‘Final Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated May 16, 2016.
6 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49934-49935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18018]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 15-047. Applicant: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,
Boston, MA 02210. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL
Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 81 FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15-051. Applicant: Iowa State University of Science
and Technology, Ames, IA 50011-3020. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic and Great Britain. Intended
Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724, May 24, 2016.
Docket Number: 15-054. Applicant: University of Connecticut Health
Center, Farmington, CT 06030. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at
81 FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15-056. Applicant: St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at
81 FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15-059. Applicant: Rutgers University, Piscataway,
NJ 00854. Instrument: Low Temperature Scanning Tunneling Microscope.
Manufacturer: Unisoku, Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 81 FR 11517,
March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 15-060. Applicant: Kent State University, Kent, OH
44242. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 81 FR 11517, March 4, 2016.
Docket Number: 16-003. Applicant: Oregon Health and Science
University, Portland, OR 97239. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
81 FR 32724-25, May 24, 2016.
Docket Number: 16-006. Applicant: Texas Southwestern Medical
Center, Dallas, TX 75390. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
81 FR 32724-25, May 24, 2016.
Docket Number: 16-009. Applicant: Stanford University, Stanford, CA
94305-5126. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company,
the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 81 FR 32724, May 24, 2016.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and
is intended for
[[Page 49935]]
research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United
States at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: July 22, 2016.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-18018 Filed 7-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
