Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From India: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 49938-49940 [2016-17950]
Download as PDF
49938
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2016 / Notices
• Non-Oriented Electrical Steels (NOES),
as defined in the antidumping orders issued
by the U.S. Department of Commerce in NonOriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.14
The products subject to this investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7209.15.0000,
7209.16.0030, 7209.16.0060, 7209.16.0070,
7209.16.0091, 7209.17.0030, 7209.17.0060,
7209.17.0070, 7209.17.0091, 7209.18.1530,
7209.18.1560, 7209.18.2510, 7209.18.2520,
7209.18.2580, 7209.18.6020, 7209.18.6090,
7209.25.0000, 7209.26.0000, 7209.27.0000,
7209.28.0000, 7209.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7211.23.1500, 7211.23.2000, 7211.23.3000,
7211.23.4500, 7211.23.6030, 7211.23.6060,
7211.23.6090, 7211.29.2030, 7211.29.2090,
7211.29.4500, 7211.29.6030, 7211.29.6080,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7225.50.6000, 7225.50.8080, 7225.99.0090,
7226.92.5000, 7226.92.7050, and
7226.92.8050.
The products subject to the investigation
may also enter under the following HTSUS
numbers: 7210.90.9000, 7212.50.0000,
7215.10.0010, 7215.10.0080, 7215.50.0016,
7215.50.0018, 7215.50.0020, 7215.50.0061,
7215.50.0063, 7215.50.0065, 7215.50.0090,
7215.90.5000, 7217.10.1000, 7217.10.2000,
7217.10.3000, 7217.10.7000, 7217.90.1000,
7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090,
7225.19.0000, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
7226.99.0180, 7228.50.5015, 7228.50.5040,
7228.50.5070, 7228.60.8000, and
7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and U.S. Customs
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–17937 Filed 7–28–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
rolled alloy steel product containing by weight at
least 0.6 percent but not more than 6 percent of
silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon, not
more than 1.0 percent of aluminum, and no other
element in an amount that would give the steel the
characteristics of another alloy steel, in coils or in
straight lengths.’’
14 See Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from the
People’s Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 71,741, 71,741–
42 (Dep’t of Commerce, Dec. 3, 2014). The orders
define NOES as ‘‘cold-rolled, flat-rolled, alloy steel
products, whether or not in coils, regardless of
width, having an actual thickness of 0.20 mm or
more, in which the core loss is substantially equal
in any direction of magnetization in the plane of the
material. The term ‘substantially equal’ means that
the cross grain direction of core loss is no more than
1.5 times the straight grain direction (i.e., the rolling
direction) of core loss. NOES has a magnetic
permeability that does not exceed 1.65 Tesla when
tested at a field of 800 A/m (equivalent to 10
Oersteds) along (i.e., parallel to) the rolling
direction of the sheet (i.e., B800 value). NOES
contains by weight more than 1.00 percent of
silicon but less than 3.5 percent of silicon, not more
than 0.08 percent of carbon, and not more than 1.5
percent of aluminum. NOES has a surface oxide
coating, to which an insulation coating may be
applied.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jul 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–865]
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From India: Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) determines that
imports of certain cold-rolled steel flat
products (‘‘cold-rolled steel’’) from India
are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(‘‘LTFV’’). The final estimated weightedaverage dumping margins of sales at
LTFV are listed below in the section
entitled ‘‘Final Determination Margins.’’
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015.
DATES: Effective July 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published in the
Federal Register the preliminary
determination on March 7, 2016.1 A
summary of the events that have
occurred since the Department
published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From India: Affirmative Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement
of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures, 81 FR 11741 (March 7, 2016)
(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance ‘‘Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from India: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination of Sales
at Less-Than-Fair-Value,’’ dated concurrently with
this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov. The signed and
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are cold-rolled steel from
India. For a full description of the scope
of the investigation, see Appendix I to
this notice.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preliminary
Scope Determination,3 the Department
set aside a period of time for parties to
address scope issues in case briefs or
other written comments on scope issues.
For a summary of the product
coverage comments and rebuttal
responses submitted on the records of
the cold-rolled steel investigations, and
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.4
The Final Scope Decision Memorandum
is incorporated by, and hereby adopted
by, this notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs that were submitted by
parties in this investigation are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum accompanying this
notice, and which is hereby adopted by
this notice. A list of the issues
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice
at Appendix II.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’), in February and March 2016, the
Department verified the sales and cost
data reported by the collapsed entity
JSW Steel Limited (‘‘JSWSL’’)/JSW
3 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain ColdRolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, the People’s
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United
Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Determination,’’ dated February
29, 2016 (‘‘Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum’’).
4 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain ColdRolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, the People’s
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United
Kingdom: Final Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated May 16, 2016 (‘‘Final Scope
Decision Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
49939
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2016 / Notices
Coated Products Limited (‘‘JSCPL’’)
(collectively ‘‘JSW’’),the sole mandatory
respondent in this investigation,
pursuant to section 782(i) of the Act. We
used standard verification procedures,
including an examination of relevant
accounting and production records, and
original source documents provided by
JSW.
Changes to the Dumping Margin
Calculations Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of the
comments received and our findings at
verification, we made certain changes to
the margin calculation for JSW. For a
discussion of these changes, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. We
have also revised the all-others rate.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that the estimated ‘‘all-others’’
rate shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis dumping margins,
and any dumping margins determined
entirely under section 776 of the Act.
We based our calculation of the ‘‘allothers’’ rate on the dumping margin
calculated for JSW, the only mandatory
respondent in this investigation.
Final Determination Margins
The Department determines that the
following estimated weighted-average
dumping margin exists:
Weighted-average
dumping margins
(percent)
Exporter/Manufacturer
JSW Steel Limited/JSW Coated Products Limited ..................................................................................
All-Others .................................................................................................................................................
Cash deposit rate
(percent)
7.60
7.60
6.70
6.70
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties in
this proceeding the calculations
performed for this final determination
within five days of the date of public
announcement of our final
determination, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
companion countervailing duty
investigation, and so long as suspension
of liquidation continues under this
antidumping duty investigation, the
cash deposit rates for this antidumping
duty investigation will be the rates
identified in the weighted-average
margin column in the rate chart, above.
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This determination and notice are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the
Act.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the
Act, the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to continue to suspend liquidation of all
entries of cold-rolled steel from India
which were entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
March 7, 2016, the date of publication
of the Preliminary Determination. We
also will instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the weighted-average
amount by which normal value exceeds
U.S. price, as indicated in the table
above, adjusted, where appropriate, for
export subsidies.
Where the product under
investigation is also subject to a
concurrent countervailing duty
investigation, we instruct CBP to require
a cash deposit less the amount of the
countervailing duty determined to
constitute any export subsidies.
Therefore, in the event that a
countervailing duty order is issued and
suspension of liquidation is resumed in
the companion countervailing duty
investigation on cold-rolled steel from
India, the Department will instruct CBP
to require cash deposits adjusted by the
amount of export subsidies, as
appropriate. These adjustments are
reflected in the final column of the rate
chart, above. Until such suspension of
liquidation is resumed in the
International Trade Commission
Notification
Dated: July 20, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jul 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, we will notify the U.S.
International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’)
of our final determination. As our final
determination is affirmative, in
accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
Act, the ITC will determine within 45
days of the final determination whether
the domestic industry in the United
States is materially injured, or
threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports, or sales (or the
likelihood of sales) for importation, of
the subject merchandise. If the ITC
determines that such injury exists, the
Department will issue an antidumping
duty order directing CBP to assess, upon
further instruction by the Department,
antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders (‘‘APOs’’)
This notice will serve as a reminder
to parties subject to APOs of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation
are certain cold-rolled (cold-reduced), flatrolled steel products, whether or not
annealed, painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other non-metallic substances.
The products covered do not include those
that are clad, plated, or coated with metal.
The products covered include coils that have
a width or other lateral measurement
(‘‘width’’) of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless
of form of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating,
etc.). The products covered also include
products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths)
of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width
that is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures
at least 10 times the thickness. The products
covered also include products not in coils
(e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75
mm or more and a width exceeding 150 mm
and measuring at least twice the thickness.
The products described above may be
rectangular, square, circular, or other shape
and include products of either rectangular or
non-rectangular cross-section where such
cross-section is achieved subsequent to the
rolling process, i.e., products which have
been ‘‘worked after rolling’’ (e.g., products
which have been beveled or rounded at the
edges). For purposes of the width and
thickness requirements referenced above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual
measurements vary, a product is within the
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49940
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 146 / Friday, July 29, 2016 / Notices
scope if application of either the nominal or
actual measurement would place it within
the scope based on the definitions set forth
above, and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for
a specific product (e.g., the thickness of
certain products with non-rectangular crosssection, the width of certain products with
non-rectangular shape, etc.), the
measurement at its greatest width or
thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of this
investigation are products in which: (1) Iron
predominates, by weight, over each of the
other contained elements; (2) the carbon
content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and
(3) none of the elements listed below exceeds
the quantity, by weight, respectively
indicated:
• 2.50 percent of manganese, or
• 3.30 percent of silicon, or
• 1.50 percent of copper, or
• 1.50 percent of aluminum, or
• 1.25 percent of chromium, or
• 0.30 percent of cobalt, or
• 0.40 percent of lead, or
• 2.00 percent of nickel, or
• 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called
wolfram), or
• 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
• 0.10 percent of niobium (also called
columbium), or
• 0.30 percent of vanadium, or
• 0.30 percent of zirconium
Unless specifically excluded, products are
included in this scope regardless of levels of
boron and titanium.
For example, specifically included in this
scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized
(commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF))
steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels,
motor lamination steels, Advanced High
Strength Steels (AHSS), and Ultra High
Strength Steels (UHSS). IF steels are
recognized as low carbon steels with microalloying levels of elements such as titanium
and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and
nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are
recognized as steels with micro-alloying
levels of elements such as chromium, copper,
niobium, titanium, vanadium, and
molybdenum. Motor lamination steels
contain micro-alloying levels of elements
such as silicon and aluminum. AHSS and
UHSS are considered high tensile strength
and high elongation steels, although AHSS
and UHSS are covered whether or not they
are high tensile strength or high elongation
steels.
Subject merchandise includes cold-rolled
steel that has been further processed in a
third country, including but not limited to
annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing,
trimming, cutting, punching, and/or slitting,
or any other processing that would not
otherwise remove the merchandise from the
scope of the investigation if performed in the
country of manufacture of the cold-rolled
steel.
All products that meet the written physical
description, and in which the chemistry
quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
element levels listed above, are within the
scope of this investigation unless specifically
excluded. The following products are outside
of and/or specifically excluded from the
scope of this investigation:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jul 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
• Ball bearing steels; 5
• Tool steels; 6
• Silico-manganese steel;7
• Grain-oriented electrical steels (GOES) as
defined in the final determination of the U.S.
Department of Commerce in Grain-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Germany, Japan, and
Poland.8
• Non-Oriented Electrical Steels (NOES),
as defined in the antidumping orders issued
by the U.S. Department of Commerce in NonOriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.9
5 Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which
contain, in addition to iron, each of the following
elements by weight in the amount specified: (i) Not
less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent of carbon;
(ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent
of manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of sulfur; (iv) none, or not more than 0.03
percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than 0.18 nor
more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than
1.25 nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii)
none, or not more than 0.28 percent of nickel; (viii)
none, or not more than 0.38 percent of copper; and
(ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of
molybdenum.
6 Tool steels are defined as steels which contain
the following combinations of elements in the
quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) More
than 1.2 percent carbon and more than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon
and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent
chromium; or (iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon
and 1 percent to 1.8 percent, inclusive, manganese;
or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent, inclusive,
chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive,
molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon
and not less than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi)
not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less than
5.5 percent tungsten.
7 Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels
containing by weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent
of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or more but not more than
1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6 percent or
more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon.
8 Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel From Germany,
Japan, and Poland: Final Determinations of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Certain Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR
42501, 42503 (July 22, 2014). This determination
defines grain-oriented electrical steel as ‘‘a flatrolled alloy steel product containing by weight at
least 0.6 percent but not more than 6 percent of
silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon, not
more than 1.0 percent of aluminum, and no other
element in an amount that would give the steel the
characteristics of another alloy steel, in coils or in
straight lengths.’’
9 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 71741, 71741–42 (Dec. 3, 2014). The
orders define NOES as ‘‘cold-rolled, flat-rolled,
alloy steel products, whether or not in coils,
regardless of width, having an actual thickness of
0.20 mm or more, in which the core loss is
substantially equal in any direction of
magnetization in the plane of the material. The term
‘substantially equal’ means that the cross grain
direction of core loss is no more than 1.5 times the
straight grain direction (i.e., the rolling direction) of
core loss. NOES has a magnetic permeability that
does not exceed 1.65 Tesla when tested at a field
of 800 A/m (equivalent to 10 Oersteds) along (i.e.,
parallel to) the rolling direction of the sheet (i.e.,
B800 value). NOES contains by weight more than
1.00 percent of silicon but less than 3.5 percent of
silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon, and
not more than 1.5 percent of aluminum. NOES has
a surface oxide coating, to which an insulation
coating may be applied.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The products subject to this investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7209.15.0000,
7209.16.0030, 7209.16.0060, 7209.16.0070,
7209.16.0091, 7209.17.0030, 7209.17.0060,
7209.17.0070, 7209.17.0091, 7209.18.1530,
7209.18.1560, 7209.18.2510, 7209.18.2520,
7209.18.2580, 7209.18.6020, 7209.18.6090,
7209.25.0000, 7209.26.0000, 7209.27.0000,
7209.28.0000, 7209.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7211.23.1500, 7211.23.2000, 7211.23.3000,
7211.23.4500, 7211.23.6030, 7211.23.6060,
7211.23.6090, 7211.29.2030, 7211.29.2090,
7211.29.4500, 7211.29.6030, 7211.29.6080,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7225.50.6000, 7225.50.8080, 7225.99.0090,
7226.92.5000, 7226.92.7050, and
7226.92.8050. The products subject to the
investigation may also enter under the
following HTSUS numbers: 7210.90.9000,
7212.50.0000, 7215.10.0010, 7215.10.0080,
7215.50.0016, 7215.50.0018, 7215.50.0020,
7215.50.0061, 7215.50.0063, 7215.50.0065,
7215.50.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7217.10.1000,
7217.10.2000, 7217.10.3000, 7217.10.7000,
7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060,
7217.90.5090, 7225.19.0000, 7226.19.1000,
7226.19.9000, 7226.99.0180, 7228.50.5015,
7228.50.5040, 7228.50.5070, 7228.60.8000,
and 7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and U.S. Customs
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Discussion of the Issues:
Comment 1: Duty Drawback Program
Comment 2: Date of Sale
Comment 3: Quality Characteristics
Comment 4: Advertising Expenses
Comment 5: Overall Cost Reconciliation
Comment 6: Affiliated Raw Material
Purchases
Comment 7: General and Administrative
Expenses
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–17950 Filed 7–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–351–844]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From Brazil: Final Affirmative
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49938-49940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-865]
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From India: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') determines
that imports of certain cold-rolled steel flat products (``cold-rolled
steel'') from India are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United
States at less than fair value (``LTFV''). The final estimated
weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed below in
the section entitled ``Final Determination Margins.'' The period of
investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015.
DATES: Effective July 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary
determination on March 7, 2016.\1\ A summary of the events that have
occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Determination,
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this
final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov. The signed and
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From India:
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of
Provisional Measures, 81 FR 11741 (March 7, 2016) (``Preliminary
Determination'').
\2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance
``Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from India: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination of Sales at Less-
Than-Fair-Value,'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are cold-rolled steel
from India. For a full description of the scope of the investigation,
see Appendix I to this notice.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preliminary Scope Determination,\3\ the
Department set aside a period of time for parties to address scope
issues in case briefs or other written comments on scope issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, the People's
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian
Federation, and the United Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination,'' dated February 29,
2016 (``Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal
responses submitted on the records of the cold-rolled steel
investigations, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all
comments timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\4\
The Final Scope Decision Memorandum is incorporated by, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, the People's
Republic of China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian
Federation, and the United Kingdom: Final Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum,'' dated May 16, 2016 (``Final Scope Decision
Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were
submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice, and which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice at Appendix II.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the ``Act''), in February and March 2016, the Department verified the
sales and cost data reported by the collapsed entity JSW Steel Limited
(``JSWSL'')/JSW
[[Page 49939]]
Coated Products Limited (``JSCPL'') (collectively ``JSW''),the sole
mandatory respondent in this investigation, pursuant to section 782(i)
of the Act. We used standard verification procedures, including an
examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original
source documents provided by JSW.
Changes to the Dumping Margin Calculations Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at
verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculation for
JSW. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. We have also revised the all-others rate.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated ``all-
others'' rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de
minimis dumping margins, and any dumping margins determined entirely
under section 776 of the Act. We based our calculation of the ``all-
others'' rate on the dumping margin calculated for JSW, the only
mandatory respondent in this investigation.
Final Determination Margins
The Department determines that the following estimated weighted-
average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter/Manufacturer dumping margins Cash deposit rate
(percent) (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSW Steel Limited/JSW Coated 7.60 6.70
Products Limited...............
All-Others...................... 7.60 6.70
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding the
calculations performed for this final determination within five days of
the date of public announcement of our final determination, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to continue to
suspend liquidation of all entries of cold-rolled steel from India
which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after March 7, 2016, the date of publication of the Preliminary
Determination. We also will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit
equal to the weighted-average amount by which normal value exceeds U.S.
price, as indicated in the table above, adjusted, where appropriate,
for export subsidies.
Where the product under investigation is also subject to a
concurrent countervailing duty investigation, we instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit less the amount of the countervailing duty
determined to constitute any export subsidies. Therefore, in the event
that a countervailing duty order is issued and suspension of
liquidation is resumed in the companion countervailing duty
investigation on cold-rolled steel from India, the Department will
instruct CBP to require cash deposits adjusted by the amount of export
subsidies, as appropriate. These adjustments are reflected in the final
column of the rate chart, above. Until such suspension of liquidation
is resumed in the companion countervailing duty investigation, and so
long as suspension of liquidation continues under this antidumping duty
investigation, the cash deposit rates for this antidumping duty
investigation will be the rates identified in the weighted-average
margin column in the rate chart, above.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the
U.S. International Trade Commission (``ITC'') of our final
determination. As our final determination is affirmative, in accordance
with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will determine within 45
days of the final determination whether the domestic industry in the
United States is materially injured, or threatened with material
injury, by reason of imports, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation, of the subject merchandise. If the ITC determines that
such injury exists, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department,
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (``APOs'')
This notice will serve as a reminder to parties subject to APOs of
their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: July 20, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain cold-
rolled (cold-reduced), flat-rolled steel products, whether or not
annealed, painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-
metallic substances. The products covered do not include those that
are clad, plated, or coated with metal. The products covered include
coils that have a width or other lateral measurement (``width'') of
12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in
successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in
straight lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that
is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the
thickness. The products covered also include products not in coils
(e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a
width exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness.
The products described above may be rectangular, square, circular,
or other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness
requirements referenced above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is
within the
[[Page 49940]]
scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement
would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth
above, and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape,
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are
products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or
less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds
the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:
2.50 percent of manganese, or
3.30 percent of silicon, or
1.50 percent of copper, or
1.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
2.00 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or
0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or
0.30 percent of vanadium, or
0.30 percent of zirconium
Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this
scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium.
For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-
free (IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, motor
lamination steels, Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS), and Ultra
High Strength Steels (UHSS). IF steels are recognized as low carbon
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/
or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA
steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of
elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and
molybdenum. Motor lamination steels contain micro-alloying levels of
elements such as silicon and aluminum. AHSS and UHSS are considered
high tensile strength and high elongation steels, although AHSS and
UHSS are covered whether or not they are high tensile strength or
high elongation steels.
Subject merchandise includes cold-rolled steel that has been
further processed in a third country, including but not limited to
annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting,
punching, and/or slitting, or any other processing that would not
otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation
if performed in the country of manufacture of the cold-rolled steel.
All products that meet the written physical description, and in
which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
element levels listed above, are within the scope of this
investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products
are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this
investigation:
Ball bearing steels; \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which contain, in
addition to iron, each of the following elements by weight in the
amount specified: (i) Not less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent
of carbon; (ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent of
manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03 percent of sulfur; (iv)
none, or not more than 0.03 percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than
0.18 nor more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than 1.25
nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii) none, or not more than
0.28 percent of nickel; (viii) none, or not more than 0.38 percent
of copper; and (ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of
molybdenum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tool steels; \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Tool steels are defined as steels which contain the
following combinations of elements in the quantity by weight
respectively indicated: (i) More than 1.2 percent carbon and more
than 10.5 percent chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon
and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent chromium; or
(iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon and 1 percent to 1.8
percent, inclusive, manganese; or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent,
inclusive, chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive,
molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less
than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi) not less than 0.5 percent
carbon and not less than 5.5 percent tungsten.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silico-manganese steel;\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels containing by
weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or
more but not more than 1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6
percent or more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grain-oriented electrical steels (GOES) as defined in
the final determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce in Grain-
Oriented Electrical Steel From Germany, Japan, and Poland.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel From Germany, Japan, and
Poland: Final Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Certain Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances,
79 FR 42501, 42503 (July 22, 2014). This determination defines
grain-oriented electrical steel as ``a flat-rolled alloy steel
product containing by weight at least 0.6 percent but not more than
6 percent of silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon, not more
than 1.0 percent of aluminum, and no other element in an amount that
would give the steel the characteristics of another alloy steel, in
coils or in straight lengths.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Oriented Electrical Steels (NOES), as defined in
the antidumping orders issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce in
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People's Republic of China,
Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People's Republic of
China, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 71741, 71741-42 (Dec. 3, 2014). The
orders define NOES as ``cold-rolled, flat-rolled, alloy steel
products, whether or not in coils, regardless of width, having an
actual thickness of 0.20 mm or more, in which the core loss is
substantially equal in any direction of magnetization in the plane
of the material. The term `substantially equal' means that the cross
grain direction of core loss is no more than 1.5 times the straight
grain direction (i.e., the rolling direction) of core loss. NOES has
a magnetic permeability that does not exceed 1.65 Tesla when tested
at a field of 800 A/m (equivalent to 10 Oersteds) along (i.e.,
parallel to) the rolling direction of the sheet (i.e., B800 value).
NOES contains by weight more than 1.00 percent of silicon but less
than 3.5 percent of silicon, not more than 0.08 percent of carbon,
and not more than 1.5 percent of aluminum. NOES has a surface oxide
coating, to which an insulation coating may be applied.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products subject to this investigation are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7209.15.0000, 7209.16.0030,
7209.16.0060, 7209.16.0070, 7209.16.0091, 7209.17.0030,
7209.17.0060, 7209.17.0070, 7209.17.0091, 7209.18.1530,
7209.18.1560, 7209.18.2510, 7209.18.2520, 7209.18.2580,
7209.18.6020, 7209.18.6090, 7209.25.0000, 7209.26.0000,
7209.27.0000, 7209.28.0000, 7209.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7211.23.1500, 7211.23.2000, 7211.23.3000, 7211.23.4500,
7211.23.6030, 7211.23.6060, 7211.23.6090, 7211.29.2030,
7211.29.2090, 7211.29.4500, 7211.29.6030, 7211.29.6080,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7225.50.6000,
7225.50.8080, 7225.99.0090, 7226.92.5000, 7226.92.7050, and
7226.92.8050. The products subject to the investigation may also
enter under the following HTSUS numbers: 7210.90.9000, 7212.50.0000,
7215.10.0010, 7215.10.0080, 7215.50.0016, 7215.50.0018,
7215.50.0020, 7215.50.0061, 7215.50.0063, 7215.50.0065,
7215.50.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7217.10.1000, 7217.10.2000,
7217.10.3000, 7217.10.7000, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030,
7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.19.0000, 7226.19.1000,
7226.19.9000, 7226.99.0180, 7228.50.5015, 7228.50.5040,
7228.50.5070, 7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and
U.S. Customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of
the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Discussion of the Issues:
Comment 1: Duty Drawback Program
Comment 2: Date of Sale
Comment 3: Quality Characteristics
Comment 4: Advertising Expenses
Comment 5: Overall Cost Reconciliation
Comment 6: Affiliated Raw Material Purchases
Comment 7: General and Administrative Expenses
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-17950 Filed 7-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P