Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 48390-48393 [2016-17557]

Download as PDF 48390 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES The products subject to the order may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Background In accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.210(c), on June 2, 2016, the Department published its affirmative final determinations in the LTFV investigations of certain corrosionresistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan.1 On July 15, 2016, the ITC notified the Department of its affirmative determination that an industry in the [FR Doc. 2016–17563 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am] United States is materially injured BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P within the meaning of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by reason of the LTFV imports of certain corrosionDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, and its International Trade Administration determination that critical circumstances do not exist with respect [A–533–863, A–475–832, A–570–026, A–580– to imports of subject merchandise from 878, A–583–856] Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan that are subject to the Department’s Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel affirmative critical circumstances Products From India, Italy, the findings.2 People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Scope of the Orders Amended Final Affirmative The products covered by these orders Antidumping Determination for India are certain flat-rolled steel products, and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty either clad, plated, or coated with Orders corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelAGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, or iron-based alloys, whether or not International Trade Administration, corrugated or painted, varnished, Department of Commerce. laminated, or coated with plastics or SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final other non-metallic substances in determinations by the Department of addition to the metallic coating. The Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the products covered include coils that have International Trade Commission (the ‘‘ITC’’), the Department is issuing 1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products antidumping duty orders on certain from India: Final Determination of Sales at Less corrosion-resistant steel products from Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination India, Italy, the People’s Republic of of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 35329 (June 2, 2016) (‘‘India Final’’); Certain Corrosion-Resistant China (‘‘PRC’’), the Republic of Korea Steel Products from Italy: Final Determination of (‘‘Korea’’), and Taiwan. In addition, the Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Department is amending its final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 determinations of sales at less-than-fair- FR 35320 (June 2, 2016) (‘‘Italy Final’’); Certain value (‘‘LTFV’’) from India and Taiwan, Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at as a result of ministerial errors. Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR DATES: Effective July 25, 2016. 35303 (June 2, 2016) (‘‘Korea Final’’); Certain FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit at (202) Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative 482–1394 and (202) 482–4031, Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part, 81 respectively (Italy), Kabir Archuletta at FR 35316 (June 2, 2016) (‘‘PRC Final’’); and Certain (202) 482–2593 (India); Elfi Blum or Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Lingjun Wang (Korea) at (202) 482–0197 Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of or (202) 482–2316, respectively; Nancy Decker or Andrew Huston at (202) 482– Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 FR 35313 (June 2, 2016) (‘‘Taiwan Final’’). 0196 or (202) 482–4261, respectively 2 See Letter to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant (PRC); or Shanah Lee or Paul Stolz at Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, from Irving A. Williamson, Chairman (202) 482–6386 and (202) 482–4474, of the U.S. International Trade Commission, respectively (Taiwan), AD/CVD regarding certain corrosion-resistant steel products Operations, Enforcement and from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan (July Compliance, U.S. Department of 15, 2016) (‘‘ITC Letter’’); see also CorrosionCommerce, 14th Street and Constitution Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, USITC Investigation Nos. Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 701–TA–534–537 and 731–TA–1274–1278 (Final), USITC Publication 4620 (July 2016). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 a width of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’ (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced above: (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above, and (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product (e.g., the thickness of certain products with nonrectangular cross-section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies. Steel products included in the scope of these orders are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated: • 2.50 percent of manganese, or • 3.30 percent of silicon, or • 1.50 percent of copper, or • 1.50 percent of aluminum, or • 1.25 percent of chromium, or • 0.30 percent of cobalt, or • 0.40 percent of lead, or • 2.00 percent of nickel, or • 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or • 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or • 0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or • 0.30 percent of vanadium, or • 0.30 percent of zirconium Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium. For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices interstitial-free (IF)) steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. Furthermore, this scope also includes Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of which are considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels. Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the orders if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope corrosion resistant steel. All products that meet the written physical description, and in which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted element levels listed above, are within the scope of these orders unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside of and/ or specifically excluded from the scope of these orders: • Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (‘‘terne plate’’), or both chromium and chromium oxides (‘‘tin free steel’’), whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating; • Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness; and • Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are three-layered corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel products less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a flat-rolled steel product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%20% ratio. The products subject to the orders are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000. The products subject to the orders may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Amendment to India Final Determination On May 31, 2016, JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW Steel Coated Products Limited (collectively ‘‘JSW’’) alleged that the Department made ministerial errors in the India Final.3 A ministerial error is defined as an error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.4 The Department reviewed the record and agrees that three of the errors referenced in JSW’s allegation constitute ministerial errors within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f).5 Specifically, the Department used an incorrect variable in the recalculation of JSW’s home market inventory carrying costs, transposed two digits in the recalculation of JSW’s indirect selling expenses, and neglected to fully adjust JSW’s cash deposit rate for export subsidies based on adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’).6 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), the Department is amending the India Final to reflect the correction of the ministerial errors described above. Based on our correction, JSW’s weighted-average dumping margin 3 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from JSW ‘‘JSW’s Ministerial Error Comments in Response to the Department’s Final Determination’’ (May 31, 2016). 4 See section 735(e) of the Act. 5 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: Allegation of Ministerial Errors in the Final Determination’’ (July 5, 2016) (‘‘India Ministerial Error Memo’’). 6 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48391 decreased from 4.44 percent to 4.43 percent. Although the ‘‘all-others’’ rate is based in part on JSW’s dumping margin, the corrections noted above did not have an effect on the all-others rate determined in the India Final.7 Amendment to Taiwan Final Determination On June 7, 2016, AK Steel Corporation (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted to the Department a timely allegation that the Department made ministerial errors in the margin calculations in the Taiwan Final.8 The Department reviewed the record and agrees that the errors referenced in Petitioner’s allegation constitute ministerial errors within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f).9 Specifically, as a result of programming errors in the application of partial AFA to certain control numbers, the Department failed to use the sales quantities to weight average the costs of certain control numbers, the Department failed to use the highest total cost of manufacture as AFA for certain control numbers, and the Department incorrectly applied AFA to certain control numbers.10 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), the Department is amending the Taiwan Final to reflect the correction of the ministerial errors described above. Based on our correction, the weighted-average dumping margin for the collapsed entity comprised of Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Company., Ltd., Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd., increased from 3.77 percent to 10.34 percent.11 In addition, because the ‘‘allothers’’ rate is based on the corrected weighted-average dumping margin, the Department has revised the all-others rate in this amended final determination accordingly.12 Antidumping Duty Orders As stated above, on July 15, 2016, in accordance with sections 735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 735(d) of the Act, the ITC notified the Department of its final determinations in these investigations, in which it found that an industry in the 7 Id. 8 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Petitioners ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Petitioner’s Ministerial Error Comments’’ (June 7, 2016). 9 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations ‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum Concerning the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan’’ (July 15, 2016). 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See the ‘‘Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins’’ section below. E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1 48392 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices United States is materially injured by reason of imports of certain corrosionresistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan and that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to imports of subject merchandise from Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan that are subject to the Department’s affirmative critical circumstances findings.13 Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(2) of the Act, the Department is issuing these antidumping duty orders. Because the ITC determined that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan are materially injuring a U.S. industry, unliquidated entries of such merchandise from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, are subject to the assessment of antidumping duties. Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the merchandise, for all relevant entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan. Antidumping duties will be assessed on unliquidated entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 4, 2016, the date of publication of the preliminary determinations,14 but will not include entries occurring after the expiration of the provisional measures period and before publication of the ITC’s final 13 See ITC Letter. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 63 (January 4, 2016) (‘‘India Prelim’’); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Italy: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 69 (January 4, 2016) (‘‘Italy Prelim’’); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 78 (January 4, 2016) (‘‘Korea Prelim’’); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 75 (January 4, 2016) (‘‘PRC Prelim’’); and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Negative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 72 (January 4, 2016) (‘‘Taiwan Prelim’’). mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 14 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 injury determination as further described below. Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation on all relevant entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan. These instructions suspending liquidation will remain in effect until further notice. The Department will also instruct CBP to require cash deposits equal to the amounts as indicated below, which are adjusted for certain countervailable subsidies, where appropriate, as described below. Accordingly, effective on the date of publication of the ITC’s final affirmative injury determinations, CBP will require, at the same time as importers would normally deposit estimated duties on this subject merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the cash deposit rates listed below.15 The relevant all-others rates apply to all producers or exporters not specifically listed. For the purpose of determining cash deposit rates, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins for imports of subject merchandise from India, Italy, Korea, and the PRC have been adjusted, as appropriate, for export subsidies found in the final determinations of the companion countervailing duty investigations of this merchandise imported from India, Italy, Korea, and the PRC.16 Because the Department determined that countervailable subsidies were not provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from Taiwan, we did not adjust the weighted-average dumping margin for export subsidies.17 In the case of determining cash deposit rates for subject merchandise from the PRC, estimated weighted-average dumping margins were also adjusted, where appropriate, for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through.18 Provisional Measures Section 733(d) of the Act states that instructions issued pursuant to an affirmative preliminary determination may not remain in effect for more than four months, except where exporters representing a significant proportion of section 736(a)(3) of the Act. India Final; Italy Final; Korea Final; and PRC Final. See also section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act. 17 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination, 81 FR 35299 (June 2, 2016). 18 See China Final, 81 FR at 35318. See also section 777A(f) of the Act. PO 00000 15 See 16 See Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 exports of the subject merchandise request the Department to extend that four-month period to no more than six months. At the request of exporters that account for a significant proportion of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, the Department extended the four-month period to six months in each case.19 In the underlying investigations, the Department published the preliminary determinations on January 4, 2016. Therefore, the extended period, beginning on the date of publication of the preliminary determination, ended on July 2, 2016. Furthermore, section 737(b) of the Act states that definitive duties are to begin on the date of publication of the ITC’s final injury determination. Therefore, in accordance with section 733(d) of the Act and our practice, the Department will instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, unliquidated entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after July 3, 2016, the date on which the provisional measures expired, until and through the day preceding the date of publication of the ITC’s final injury determinations in the Federal Register. Suspension of liquidation will resume on the date of publication of the ITC’s final determination in the Federal Register. Critical Circumstances With regard to the ITC’s negative critical circumstances determination on imports of subject merchandise from Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, the Department will instruct CBP to lift suspension and to refund any cash deposits made to secure the payment of estimated antidumping duties with respect to entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after October 6, 2015 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of publication of the preliminary determinations), but before January 4, 2016, (i.e., the date of publication of the preliminary determinations). With regard to the ITC’s negative critical circumstances determination on imports of subject merchandise from Italy, the Department will instruct CBP to lift suspension and to refund any cash deposits made to secure payment of estimated antidumping duties with respect to entries of subject merchandise 19 See India Prelim; Italy Prelim; Korea Prelim; PRC Prelim; and Taiwan Prelim. E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1 48393 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 2, 2016, (i.e., the date of publication of for consumption by one respondent on the final determination for Italy).20 or after March 4, 2016 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of publication of the final determination for Italy), but before June Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins The weighted-average antidumping duty margin percentages and cash deposit rates are as follows: Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) 21 Exporter or producer Cash deposit rate (percent) 4.43 0.00 3.05 3.86 0.00 0.00 12.63 92.12 12.63 12.63 92.12 12.48 8.75 47.80 28.28 8.75 47.79 28.27 209.97 209.97 209.97 209.97 199.43 199.43 199.43 199.43 India: JSW: 22 ................................................................................................................................................. JSW Steel Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... JSW Coated Products Ltd .................................................................................................................... Uttam Galva: 23 ..................................................................................................................................... Uttam Galva Steel Limited ................................................................................................................... Uttam Value Steels Limited .................................................................................................................. Atlantis International Services Company Ltd ....................................................................................... Uttam Galva Steels, Netherlands, B.V ................................................................................................. Uttam Galva Steels (BVI) Limited ........................................................................................................ All-Others .............................................................................................................................................. Italy: Acciaieria Arvedi S.p.A ......................................................................................................................... Marcegalia S.p.A 24 .............................................................................................................................. All-Others .............................................................................................................................................. Korea: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................... Hyundai Steel Company ....................................................................................................................... All-Others .............................................................................................................................................. PRC: Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd ......................................................................................... Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co. Ltd ....................................................................................................... Union Steel China ................................................................................................................................ PRC-Wide Entity ................................................................................................................................... Taiwan: Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd., Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd., and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd 25 All-Others .............................................................................................................................................. This notice constitutes the antidumping duty orders with respect to certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, the PRC, Korea and Taiwan pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. Interested parties can find a list of antidumping duty orders currently in effect at http://enforcement. trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. These orders are published in accordance with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b). Dated: July 18, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–17557 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 20 In the Italy Final, the Department found that critical circumstances existed for Marcegaglia S.p.A. Because we calculated a de minimis preliminary dumping margin for Marcegaglia S.p.A., we did not instruct CBP to collect cash deposits until 90 days before the Italy Final. 21 See India Ministerial Error Memo for a complete discussion regarding the change to JSW’s weighted-average dumping margin and cash deposit rate. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 10.34 10.34 The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: West Coast Permit Family of Forms—Southwest. OMB Control Number: 0648–0204. Form Number(s): None. Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved information collection). Number of Respondents: 1705. Average Hours per Response: HMS permit applications, 30 minutes; HMS permit renewal applications, 3 minutes; CPS renewal applications, 15 minutes; CPS transfers, 30 minutes; photo requirement, 30 minutes; exempted fishing permits, 1 hour; appeals, 2 hours. Burden Hours: 94. Needs and Uses: This request is for a revision and extension to the existing reporting requirements approved under OMB Control Number 0648–0204, West Coast Region Family of Forms. The West Coast Region (WCR) Permits Office administers permits required for persons to participate in Federally- 22 The Department found JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW Coated Products Limited to be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. JSW’s cash deposit rate was reduced as a result of correction of the ministerial errors described above. See India Final, 81 FR at 35330. 23 The Department found Uttam Galva Steels Limited, Uttam Value Steels Limited, Atlantis International Services Company Ltd., Uttam Galva Steels, Netherlands, B.V., and Uttam Galva Steels (BVI) Limited to be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. See India Final, 81 FR at 35330. 24 The Department found that Marcegaglia S.p.A.’s weighted-average dumping margin and cash deposit rate should also be applied to Marcegaglia Carbon Steel. See Italy Final and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. 25 The Department found Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd., Synn Industrial Co., Ltd., and Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd., to be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. See Taiwan Final, 81 FR at 35314. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48390-48393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-863, A-475-832, A-570-026, A-580-878, A-583-856]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From India, Italy, the 
People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended 
Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and 
Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (the ``Department'') and the International Trade Commission 
(the ``ITC''), the Department is issuing antidumping duty orders on 
certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC''), the Republic of Korea 
(``Korea''), and Taiwan. In addition, the Department is amending its 
final determinations of sales at less-than-fair-value (``LTFV'') from 
India and Taiwan, as a result of ministerial errors.

DATES: Effective July 25, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit at 
(202) 482-1394 and (202) 482-4031, respectively (Italy), Kabir 
Archuletta at (202) 482-2593 (India); Elfi Blum or Lingjun Wang (Korea) 
at (202) 482-0197 or (202) 482-2316, respectively; Nancy Decker or 
Andrew Huston at (202) 482-0196 or (202) 482-4261, respectively (PRC); 
or Shanah Lee or Paul Stolz at (202) 482-6386 and (202) 482-4474, 
respectively (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    In accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''), and 19 CFR 351.210(c), on June 2, 
2016, the Department published its affirmative final determinations in 
the LTFV investigations of certain corrosion-resistant steel products 
from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan.\1\ On July 15, 2016, the 
ITC notified the Department of its affirmative determination that an 
industry in the United States is materially injured within the meaning 
of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by reason of the LTFV imports of 
certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, 
the PRC, and Taiwan, and its determination that critical circumstances 
do not exist with respect to imports of subject merchandise from Italy, 
Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan that are subject to the Department's 
affirmative critical circumstances findings.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final 
Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 35329 (June 
2, 2016) (``India Final''); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from Italy: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 
in Part, 81 FR 35320 (June 2, 2016) (``Italy Final''); Certain 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative 
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 35303 (June 2, 2016) 
(``Korea Final''); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 
the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances 
Determination, in Part, 81 FR 35316 (June 2, 2016) (``PRC Final''); 
and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative 
Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 FR 35313 (June 
2, 2016) (``Taiwan Final'').
    \2\ See Letter to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, from Irving A. Williamson, 
Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission, regarding 
certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, 
the PRC, and Taiwan (July 15, 2016) (``ITC Letter''); see also 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Korea, the 
PRC, and Taiwan, USITC Investigation Nos. 701-TA-534-537 and 731-TA-
1274-1278 (Final), USITC Publication 4620 (July 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The products covered by these orders are certain flat-rolled steel 
products, either clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant 
metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-
based alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, varnished, 
laminated, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in 
addition to the metallic coating. The products covered include coils 
that have a width of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form of coil 
(e.g., in successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, 
etc.). The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., 
in straight lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that 
is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the 
thickness. The products covered also include products not in coils 
(e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a 
width exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The 
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or other 
shape and include products of either rectangular or non-rectangular 
cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the 
rolling process, i.e., products which have been ``worked after 
rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the 
edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced 
above:
    (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set forth above, and
    (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product 
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, 
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
    Steel products included in the scope of these orders are products 
in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other 
contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by 
weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, 
by weight, respectively indicated:
     2.50 percent of manganese, or
     3.30 percent of silicon, or
     1.50 percent of copper, or
     1.50 percent of aluminum, or
     1.25 percent of chromium, or
     0.30 percent of cobalt, or
     0.40 percent of lead, or
     2.00 percent of nickel, or
     0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or
     0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
     0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or
     0.30 percent of vanadium, or
     0.30 percent of zirconium

Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this scope 
regardless of levels of boron and titanium.
    For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum 
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as

[[Page 48391]]

interstitial-free (IF)) steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA) 
steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-
alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to 
stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as 
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, 
niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum.
    Furthermore, this scope also includes Advanced High Strength Steels 
(AHSS) and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of which are 
considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels.
    Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that 
has been further processed in a third country, including but not 
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would 
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the orders if 
performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope corrosion 
resistant steel.
    All products that meet the written physical description, and in 
which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted 
element levels listed above, are within the scope of these orders 
unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside of 
and/or specifically excluded from the scope of these orders:
     Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with 
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne 
plate''), or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''), 
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other non-
metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
     Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more in 
composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at 
least twice the thickness; and
     Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are 
three-layered corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel products less than 
4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a flat-rolled steel 
product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20% ratio.
    The products subject to the orders are currently classified in the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') under item 
numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 
7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 
7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000.
    The products subject to the orders may also enter under the 
following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 
7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 
7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 
7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
    The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the 
orders is dispositive.

Amendment to India Final Determination

    On May 31, 2016, JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW Steel Coated Products 
Limited (collectively ``JSW'') alleged that the Department made 
ministerial errors in the India Final.\3\ A ministerial error is 
defined as an error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic 
function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, 
duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional 
error which the Secretary considers ministerial.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from JSW ``JSW's 
Ministerial Error Comments in Response to the Department's Final 
Determination'' (May 31, 2016).
    \4\ See section 735(e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department reviewed the record and agrees that three of the 
errors referenced in JSW's allegation constitute ministerial errors 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f).\5\ Specifically, the 
Department used an incorrect variable in the recalculation of JSW's 
home market inventory carrying costs, transposed two digits in the 
recalculation of JSW's indirect selling expenses, and neglected to 
fully adjust JSW's cash deposit rate for export subsidies based on 
adverse facts available (``AFA'').\6\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), 
the Department is amending the India Final to reflect the correction of 
the ministerial errors described above. Based on our correction, JSW's 
weighted-average dumping margin decreased from 4.44 percent to 4.43 
percent. Although the ``all-others'' rate is based in part on JSW's 
dumping margin, the corrections noted above did not have an effect on 
the all-others rate determined in the India Final.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations 
``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant 
Steel Products from India: Allegation of Ministerial Errors in the 
Final Determination'' (July 5, 2016) (``India Ministerial Error 
Memo'').
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment to Taiwan Final Determination

    On June 7, 2016, AK Steel Corporation (``Petitioner'') submitted to 
the Department a timely allegation that the Department made ministerial 
errors in the margin calculations in the Taiwan Final.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Petitioners 
``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: 
Petitioner's Ministerial Error Comments'' (June 7, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department reviewed the record and agrees that the errors 
referenced in Petitioner's allegation constitute ministerial errors 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f).\9\ Specifically, as a result 
of programming errors in the application of partial AFA to certain 
control numbers, the Department failed to use the sales quantities to 
weight average the costs of certain control numbers, the Department 
failed to use the highest total cost of manufacture as AFA for certain 
control numbers, and the Department incorrectly applied AFA to certain 
control numbers.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), the Department is 
amending the Taiwan Final to reflect the correction of the ministerial 
errors described above. Based on our correction, the weighted-average 
dumping margin for the collapsed entity comprised of Prosperity Tieh 
Enterprise Company., Ltd., Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., and Synn 
Industrial Co., Ltd., increased from 3.77 percent to 10.34 percent.\11\ 
In addition, because the ``all-others'' rate is based on the corrected 
weighted-average dumping margin, the Department has revised the all-
others rate in this amended final determination accordingly.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations 
``Ministerial Error Memorandum Concerning the Final Determination in 
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant 
Steel Products from Taiwan'' (July 15, 2016).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ See the ``Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins'' 
section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Antidumping Duty Orders

    As stated above, on July 15, 2016, in accordance with sections 
735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 735(d) of the Act, the ITC notified the Department 
of its final determinations in these investigations, in which it found 
that an industry in the

[[Page 48392]]

United States is materially injured by reason of imports of certain 
corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, 
and Taiwan and that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to 
imports of subject merchandise from Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan 
that are subject to the Department's affirmative critical circumstances 
findings.\13\ Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(2) of the 
Act, the Department is issuing these antidumping duty orders. Because 
the ITC determined that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel 
products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan are materially 
injuring a U.S. industry, unliquidated entries of such merchandise from 
India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, entered or withdrawn from 
warehouse for consumption, are subject to the assessment of antidumping 
duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See ITC Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the 
Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to 
assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties 
equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise 
exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the 
merchandise, for all relevant entries of certain corrosion-resistant 
steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan. 
Antidumping duties will be assessed on unliquidated entries of certain 
corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, 
and Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after January 4, 2016, the date of publication of the preliminary 
determinations,\14\ but will not include entries occurring after the 
expiration of the provisional measures period and before publication of 
the ITC's final injury determination as further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: 
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 63 (January 4, 
2016) (``India Prelim''); Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 
from Italy: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 69 
(January 4, 2016) (``Italy Prelim''); Certain Corrosion-Resistant 
Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Affirmative Preliminary 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of 
Final Determination, 81 FR 78 (January 4, 2016) (``Korea Prelim''); 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's 
Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 
75 (January 4, 2016) (``PRC Prelim''); and Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Negative Preliminary 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 72 (January 4, 
2016) (``Taiwan Prelim'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department 
will instruct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation on all relevant 
entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, 
Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan. These instructions suspending 
liquidation will remain in effect until further notice.
    The Department will also instruct CBP to require cash deposits 
equal to the amounts as indicated below, which are adjusted for certain 
countervailable subsidies, where appropriate, as described below. 
Accordingly, effective on the date of publication of the ITC's final 
affirmative injury determinations, CBP will require, at the same time 
as importers would normally deposit estimated duties on this subject 
merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the cash deposit rates listed 
below.\15\ The relevant all-others rates apply to all producers or 
exporters not specifically listed. For the purpose of determining cash 
deposit rates, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins for 
imports of subject merchandise from India, Italy, Korea, and the PRC 
have been adjusted, as appropriate, for export subsidies found in the 
final determinations of the companion countervailing duty 
investigations of this merchandise imported from India, Italy, Korea, 
and the PRC.\16\ Because the Department determined that countervailable 
subsidies were not provided to producers and exporters of certain 
corrosion-resistant steel products from Taiwan, we did not adjust the 
weighted-average dumping margin for export subsidies.\17\ In the case 
of determining cash deposit rates for subject merchandise from the PRC, 
estimated weighted-average dumping margins were also adjusted, where 
appropriate, for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See section 736(a)(3) of the Act.
    \16\ See India Final; Italy Final; Korea Final; and PRC Final. 
See also section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act.
    \17\ See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Negative Countervailing 
Duty Determination, 81 FR 35299 (June 2, 2016).
    \18\ See China Final, 81 FR at 35318. See also section 777A(f) 
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Provisional Measures

    Section 733(d) of the Act states that instructions issued pursuant 
to an affirmative preliminary determination may not remain in effect 
for more than four months, except where exporters representing a 
significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise request 
the Department to extend that four-month period to no more than six 
months. At the request of exporters that account for a significant 
proportion of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, 
Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan, the Department extended the four-
month period to six months in each case.\19\ In the underlying 
investigations, the Department published the preliminary determinations 
on January 4, 2016. Therefore, the extended period, beginning on the 
date of publication of the preliminary determination, ended on July 2, 
2016. Furthermore, section 737(b) of the Act states that definitive 
duties are to begin on the date of publication of the ITC's final 
injury determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See India Prelim; Italy Prelim; Korea Prelim; PRC Prelim; 
and Taiwan Prelim.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, in accordance with section 733(d) of the Act and our 
practice, the Department will instruct CBP to terminate the suspension 
of liquidation and to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, 
unliquidated entries of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from 
India, Italy, Korea, the PRC, and Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption after July 3, 2016, the date on which the 
provisional measures expired, until and through the day preceding the 
date of publication of the ITC's final injury determinations in the 
Federal Register. Suspension of liquidation will resume on the date of 
publication of the ITC's final determination in the Federal Register.

Critical Circumstances

    With regard to the ITC's negative critical circumstances 
determination on imports of subject merchandise from Korea, the PRC, 
and Taiwan, the Department will instruct CBP to lift suspension and to 
refund any cash deposits made to secure the payment of estimated 
antidumping duties with respect to entries of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
October 6, 2015 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of publication of the 
preliminary determinations), but before January 4, 2016, (i.e., the 
date of publication of the preliminary determinations). With regard to 
the ITC's negative critical circumstances determination on imports of 
subject merchandise from Italy, the Department will instruct CBP to 
lift suspension and to refund any cash deposits made to secure payment 
of estimated antidumping duties with respect to entries of subject 
merchandise

[[Page 48393]]

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption by one respondent 
on or after March 4, 2016 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of 
publication of the final determination for Italy), but before June 2, 
2016, (i.e., the date of publication of the final determination for 
Italy).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ In the Italy Final, the Department found that critical 
circumstances existed for Marcegaglia S.p.A. Because we calculated a 
de minimis preliminary dumping margin for Marcegaglia S.p.A., we did 
not instruct CBP to collect cash deposits until 90 days before the 
Italy Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins

    The weighted-average antidumping duty margin percentages and cash 
deposit rates are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Weighted-average
       Exporter or producer           dumping margin   Cash deposit rate
                                      (percent) \21\       (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
India:
    JSW: \22\.....................               4.43               0.00
    JSW Steel Ltd.................
    JSW Coated Products Ltd.......
    Uttam Galva: \23\.............               3.05               0.00
    Uttam Galva Steel Limited.....
    Uttam Value Steels Limited....
    Atlantis International
     Services Company Ltd.........
    Uttam Galva Steels,
     Netherlands, B.V.............
    Uttam Galva Steels (BVI)
     Limited......................
    All-Others....................               3.86               0.00
Italy:
    Acciaieria Arvedi S.p.A.......              12.63              12.63
    Marcegalia S.p.A \24\.........              92.12              92.12
    All-Others....................              12.63              12.48
Korea:
    Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./                8.75               8.75
     Union Steel Manufacturing
     Co., Ltd.....................
    Hyundai Steel Company.........              47.80              47.79
    All-Others....................              28.28              28.27
PRC:
    Yieh Phui (China)                          209.97             199.43
     Technomaterial Co., Ltd......
    Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co.               209.97             199.43
     Ltd..........................
    Union Steel China.............             209.97             199.43
    PRC-Wide Entity...............             209.97             199.43
Taiwan:
    Prosperity Tieh Enterprise                  10.34
     Co., Ltd., Yieh Phui
     Enterprise Co., Ltd., and
     Synn Industrial Co., Ltd \25\
    All-Others....................              10.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice constitutes the antidumping duty orders with respect to 
certain corrosion-resistant steel products from India, Italy, the PRC, 
Korea and Taiwan pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. Interested 
parties can find a list of antidumping duty orders currently in effect 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See India Ministerial Error Memo for a complete discussion 
regarding the change to JSW's weighted-average dumping margin and 
cash deposit rate.
    \22\ The Department found JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW Coated Products 
Limited to be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. JSW's 
cash deposit rate was reduced as a result of correction of the 
ministerial errors described above. See India Final, 81 FR at 35330.
    \23\ The Department found Uttam Galva Steels Limited, Uttam 
Value Steels Limited, Atlantis International Services Company Ltd., 
Uttam Galva Steels, Netherlands, B.V., and Uttam Galva Steels (BVI) 
Limited to be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. See 
India Final, 81 FR at 35330.
    \24\ The Department found that Marcegaglia S.p.A.'s weighted-
average dumping margin and cash deposit rate should also be applied 
to Marcegaglia Carbon Steel. See Italy Final and accompanying Issues 
and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
    \25\ The Department found Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd., Synn 
Industrial Co., Ltd., and Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd., to 
be affiliated and treated them as a single entity. See Taiwan Final, 
81 FR at 35314.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These orders are published in accordance with section 736(a) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b).

    Dated: July 18, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-17557 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P