NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2016-03; Procedure for Invoking Paragraph 17 of the May 4, 2016 Amendment to the November 3, 2015 Takata Consent Order, 47854-47856 [2016-17356]
Download as PDF
47854
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Notices
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: July 11, 2016.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–17415 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD–2016 0073]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
AIRLOOM; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 22, 2016
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2016–0073.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bianca Carr, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–9309, Email Bianca.carr@dot.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jul 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel AIRLOOM is:
INTENDED COMMERCIAL USE OF
VESSEL: Sailing tours.
GEOGRAPHIC REGION: ‘‘Washington
State.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2016–0073 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: July 12, 2016.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–17416 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0069]
Request for Information: Nationally
Uniform 911 Data System; Correction
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
NHTSA published a
document in the Federal Register of
June 30, 2016, concerning a request for
information on the development of a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
nationally uniform 911 data system. The
document contained incorrect
information and an incorrect email
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurie Flaherty, 202–366–2705.
Correction
In the Federal Register of June 30,
2016, in FR Doc. 2016–15368, on page
42786, make the following two
corrections:
a. In the third column, correct the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT caption
to read:
Laurie Flaherty, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Office of Emergency
Medical Services, (202) 366–2705,
laurie.flaherty@dot.gov, located at the United
States Department of Transportation; 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., NPD–400, Room
W44–322, Washington, DC 20590.
b. In the third column, correct the
second sentence of the second
paragraph of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION caption to read:
Models for a nationally uniform data
system exist in other disciplines, for
example, the National Fire Incident
Reporting System (N–FIRS), https://
www.nfirs.fema.gov/, and the National EMS
Information System (NEMSIS), https://
nemsis.org.
Dated: July 11, 2016.
Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2016–17207 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0077]
NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin
2016–03; Procedure for Invoking
Paragraph 17 of the May 4, 2016
Amendment to the November 3, 2015
Takata Consent Order
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) is
issuing this Enforcement Guidance
Bulletin to inform the public of the
process and procedure the Agency has
established in connection with
Paragraph 17 of the May 4, 2016
Amendment to the November 3, 2015
Consent Order with TK Holdings Inc.,
and the standards and criteria that will
guide Agency decision-making.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
47855
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For legal issues: Elizabeth Mykytiuk,
Office of the Chief Counsel, NCC–100,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone: (202) 366–5263).
For general information regarding
NHTSA’s investigation into Takata Air
Bag Inflator ruptures and the related
recalls: https://www.safercar.gov/rs/
takata/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA or Agency) is
issuing this Enforcement Guidance
Bulletin (the ‘‘Bulletin’’) to inform the
public of the circumstances under
which NHTSA would consider invoking
Paragraph 17 of the Agency’s May 4,
2016 Amendment to the November 3,
2015 Consent Order with TK Holdings
Inc. (‘‘Takata’’) 1 to alter the recall
schedule, as well as to provide guidance
on the standards and criteria that would
guide such decision-making.
I. Background
On June 11, 2014, NHTSA opened a
formal defect investigation (Preliminary
Evaluation, PE14–016) into certain
Takata air bag inflators (‘‘inflators’’) that
may become over-pressurized and/or
rupture during air bag deployment,
resulting in death or injury to the driver
and/or passenger. On February 24, 2015,
NHTSA upgraded and expanded this
investigation (Engineering Analysis,
EA15–001).
Subsequently, Takata agreed to
submit four Defect Information Reports
(DIRs) on May 18, 2014, declaring that
a defect existed in certain inflator types
that were manufactured by Takata
during certain periods of time. See
Recall Nos. 15E–040, 15E–041, 15E–042,
and 15E–043. Those DIRs triggered an
obligation on the part of affected motor
vehicle manufacturers to conduct a
recall of motor vehicles containing the
defective inflators. See 49 CFR 573.5(a).
On November 3, 2015, NHTSA issued,
and Takata agreed to, a Consent Order,
which among other things established
conditions upon which Takata would be
required to expand the scope of the
defective inflator population by filing
future DIRs. Again, the filing of such
DIRs by Takata triggered an obligation
by the motor vehicle manufacturers to
submit DIRs covering the affected motor
vehicles and to conduct a recall of
motor vehicles in which the defective
inflators are installed. See 49 CFR
573.3(f), 573.5(a); see also Coordinated
Remedy Order at ¶ 46 (Nov. 3, 2015).
On May 4, 2016, NHTSA and Takata
agreed to an Amendment to the
November 3, 2015 Consent Order (the
‘‘Amendment’’), under which Takata
agreed to declare a defect in all driver
and passenger inflators that contain an
ammonium nitrate-based propellant,
and do not contain a moisture-absorbing
desiccant. The Amendment was based
upon the findings of three independent
research organizations that most of the
inflator ruptures are associated with
long-term propellant degradation caused
by years of exposure to temperature
fluctuations and intrusion of moisture
present in the ambient atmosphere. See
Amendment at ¶ 2. Based upon the
Agency’s conclusions regarding the root
cause of the inflator ruptures, among
other reasons, the recall is to be
conducted on a rolling basis, with
Takata filing additional DIRs on the
following schedule (which is set forth in
Paragraph 14 of the Amendment):
DIR dates
Zone A population
Zone B population
Zone C population
May 16, 2016 .......................
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2011 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2012 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2013 & older.
All remaining vehicles not currently
under recall containing non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN inflators.
All like for like non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN replacement
parts.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2008 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2009 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2010 & older.
All remaining vehicles not currently
under recall containing non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN inflators.
All like for like non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN replacement
parts.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2004 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2008 & older.
All vehicles not currently under recall containing non-desiccated
frontal Takata PSAN inflators—
MY 2009 & older.
All remaining vehicles not currently
under recall containing non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN inflators.
All like for like non-desiccated frontal Takata PSAN replacement
parts.
December 31, 2016 ..............
December 31, 2017 ..............
December 31, 2018 ..............
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
December 31, 2019 ..............
As set forth in Paragraph 7.a. of the
Amendment, Zone A comprises the
states and U.S. territories with the
greatest temperature cycling and
absolute humidity. It includes the
following states and U.S. territories:
Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia,
Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South
Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American
Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana
Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Zone B comprises states with
moderate temperature cycling and
absolute humidity. It includes the
following states: Arizona, Arkansas,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois,
Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland,
Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
See Amendment at ¶ 7.b.
Zone C comprises states with lower
temperature cycling and absolute
humidity. It includes the following
states: Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut,
Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New
Hampshire, New York, North Dakota,
Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota,
Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin,
and Wyoming. See Amendment at ¶ 7.c.
The Amendment also sets forth a
procedure under which the DIR
schedule above may be modified or
amended. More specifically, Paragraph
17 provides:
1 The November 3, 2015 Consent Order and May
4, 2016 Amendment are available on NHTSA’s Web
site at https://www.safercar.gov/rs/takata/
index.html, under the ‘‘Related Documents’’
hyperlink.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jul 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
47856
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Notices
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Based on the presentation of
additional test data, analysis, or other
relevant and appropriate evidence, by
Takata, an automobile manufacturer, or
any other credible source, NHTSA may,
after consultation with Takata, alter the
schedule set forth in Paragraph 14 to
modify or amend a DIR or to defer
certain inflator types or vehicles, or a
portion thereof, to a later DIR filing date.
Any such evidence must be submitted
to NHTSA no later than one-hundredtwenty (120) days before the relevant
DIR filing date. This paragraph applies
only to the DIRs scheduled to be issued
on or after December 31, 2016 under the
schedule established by Paragraph 14 of
this Amendment.
The Agency believes it is important to
provide additional guidance on the
process and conditions under which
NHTSA would consider altering the
recall schedule to modify or amend a
DIR or defer the filing of a DIR, as well
as guidance on the standards and
criteria that would guide such decisionmaking. This process shall not be used
to expedite or expand the DIR schedule,
nor shall it be used to eliminate a
population of vehicles from the recall.
II. Process and Procedure
A. Petition: No later than 120 days
before the applicable DIR filing date,
Takata, a vehicle manufacturer, or other
credible source (the ‘‘petitioner’’) may
petition the Agency for a modification
or amendment to the DIR schedule. The
petition shall be in writing and shall be
directed to the Associate Administrator
for Enforcement, with a copy to Chief
Counsel. The petition shall specify the
precise modification or amendment to
the DIR schedule being requested by the
petitioner, including the affected
vehicle makes, models, and model years
(the ‘‘particular class of vehicles’’). The
petition shall also set forth all data,
information, and arguments of the
petitioner supporting its petition. To the
extent the petitioner requests
confidential treatment under 49 CFR
part 512 in connection with any data,
information, and arguments, it shall
submit a publicly available summary of
such confidential materials.
B. Public Notice and Comment:
Within 14 days of receiving a petition,
NHTSA shall publish a notice of the
petition in the Federal Register. The
notice shall include a brief summary of
the petition, a description of the
particular class of vehicles, a statement
of the availability of the petition and
other relevant information for public
inspection, and an invitation to
interested persons to submit written
data, information, and arguments
concerning the petition to a public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jul 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
docket. The notice of the petition shall
also specify the deadline for submitting
data, information, and arguments
concerning the petition, which deadline
shall not be less than 14 days after the
Federal Register notice.
C. Disposition of the Petition: After
reviewing the written data, views, and
arguments from the petitioner and any
interested persons, as well as other
available information, and after
consulting with Takata, the Associate
Administrator for Enforcement shall
make a decision whether to grant or
deny the petition. Notice of the grant or
denial of the petition shall be issued to
the petitioner, and to Takata and any
affected vehicle manufacturer, no less
than 45 days before the relevant DIR
filing date. Notice of the grant or denial
of the petition shall also be published in
the Federal Register.
D. Appeal: Within 14 days of notice
of a grant or denial in the Federal
Register, any interested person may
appeal the grant or denial of the petition
to the Administrator. An appeal shall be
in writing and shall be directed to the
Administrator, with a copy to the Chief
Counsel. The Administrator will base
his final decision on the data,
information, and arguments submitted
in support of the petition and during the
comment period, and other available
information. The final decision will be
issued no less than 5 days before the
applicable DIR filing date. Notice of
final decision shall also be published in
the Federal Register.
moisture content (over time), wafer
diameter, and closed-bomb test data. In
evaluating this evidence, the Agency
will closely scrutinize the number of
inflators tested, the age of the inflators
tested, and the history of the vehicles
from which the inflators were removed.
A petitioner may also satisfy the
standard of proof through robust
predictive modeling, which modeling
shall be independently verified by
NHTSA’s expert, Dr. Harold Blomquist.
In all instances, a petition will be
denied if there has been a rupture
incident in the field or in testing that
involves the inflator type contained in
the particular class of vehicles at issue.
Applicability/Legal Statement: This
Enforcement Guidance Bulletin sets
forth NHTSA’s current interpretation
and thinking on the process and
procedures under Paragraph 17 of the
Amendment, and the standards and
criteria that will guide its decisionmaking. This Bulletin is not a final
agency action and is intended as
guidance only. This Bulletin is not
intended, nor can it be relied upon, to
create any rights enforceable by any
party against NHTSA, the Department of
Transportation, or the United States.
Moreover, the process and procedures
set forth herein do not establish any
defense to any violations of the statutes
and regulations that NHTSA
administers. This Bulletin may be
revised without notice to reflect changes
in NHTSA’s evaluation and analysis, or
to clarify and update text.
III. Standard of Proof
NHTSA may grant the petition if the
Agency finds that the written data,
information, and arguments regarding
the petition and other available
information demonstrate, by a
preponderance of the evidence, that
either: (i) There has not yet been, nor
will be for some period of years in the
future, sufficient propellant degradation
to render the inflators contained in the
particular class of vehicles unreasonably
dangerous in terms of susceptibility to
rupture; or (ii) the service life
expectancy of the inflators installed in
the particular class of vehicles is
sufficiently long that they will not pose
an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle
safety if recalled at a later date.
The Agency may rely on any relevant
criteria in determining whether the
available evidence satisfies the standard
of proof. Generally, a petitioner may
satisfy the standard of proof by
submitting evidence concerning the
physical attributes of the category of
inflators at issue. Such evidence may
include, but is not limited to, inflator
diffusion rates, booster and propellant
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., 30118,
30162, 30166(b)(1), 30166(g)(1); delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.95(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued: July 15, 2016.
Mark R. Rosekind, Ph.D.
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–17356 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
[OMB Control No. 2900–0095]
Agency Information Collection
(Pension Claim Questionnaire for Farm
Income, VA Form 21P–4165); Activity
Under OMB Review
Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice
announces that the Veterans Benefits
Administration (VBA), Department of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 141 (Friday, July 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47854-47856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0077]
NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2016-03; Procedure for
Invoking Paragraph 17 of the May 4, 2016 Amendment to the November 3,
2015 Takata Consent Order
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is
issuing this Enforcement Guidance Bulletin to inform the public of the
process and procedure the Agency has established in connection with
Paragraph 17 of the May 4, 2016 Amendment to the November 3, 2015
Consent Order with TK Holdings Inc., and the standards and criteria
that will guide Agency decision-making.
[[Page 47855]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For legal issues: Elizabeth Mykytiuk, Office of the Chief Counsel,
NCC-100, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 366-5263).
For general information regarding NHTSA's investigation into Takata
Air Bag Inflator ruptures and the related recalls: https://www.safercar.gov/rs/takata/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA or Agency) is issuing this Enforcement Guidance
Bulletin (the ``Bulletin'') to inform the public of the circumstances
under which NHTSA would consider invoking Paragraph 17 of the Agency's
May 4, 2016 Amendment to the November 3, 2015 Consent Order with TK
Holdings Inc. (``Takata'') \1\ to alter the recall schedule, as well as
to provide guidance on the standards and criteria that would guide such
decision-making.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The November 3, 2015 Consent Order and May 4, 2016 Amendment
are available on NHTSA's Web site at https://www.safercar.gov/rs/takata/, under the ``Related Documents'' hyperlink.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
On June 11, 2014, NHTSA opened a formal defect investigation
(Preliminary Evaluation, PE14-016) into certain Takata air bag
inflators (``inflators'') that may become over-pressurized and/or
rupture during air bag deployment, resulting in death or injury to the
driver and/or passenger. On February 24, 2015, NHTSA upgraded and
expanded this investigation (Engineering Analysis, EA15-001).
Subsequently, Takata agreed to submit four Defect Information
Reports (DIRs) on May 18, 2014, declaring that a defect existed in
certain inflator types that were manufactured by Takata during certain
periods of time. See Recall Nos. 15E-040, 15E-041, 15E-042, and 15E-
043. Those DIRs triggered an obligation on the part of affected motor
vehicle manufacturers to conduct a recall of motor vehicles containing
the defective inflators. See 49 CFR 573.5(a).
On November 3, 2015, NHTSA issued, and Takata agreed to, a Consent
Order, which among other things established conditions upon which
Takata would be required to expand the scope of the defective inflator
population by filing future DIRs. Again, the filing of such DIRs by
Takata triggered an obligation by the motor vehicle manufacturers to
submit DIRs covering the affected motor vehicles and to conduct a
recall of motor vehicles in which the defective inflators are
installed. See 49 CFR 573.3(f), 573.5(a); see also Coordinated Remedy
Order at ] 46 (Nov. 3, 2015).
On May 4, 2016, NHTSA and Takata agreed to an Amendment to the
November 3, 2015 Consent Order (the ``Amendment''), under which Takata
agreed to declare a defect in all driver and passenger inflators that
contain an ammonium nitrate-based propellant, and do not contain a
moisture-absorbing desiccant. The Amendment was based upon the findings
of three independent research organizations that most of the inflator
ruptures are associated with long-term propellant degradation caused by
years of exposure to temperature fluctuations and intrusion of moisture
present in the ambient atmosphere. See Amendment at ] 2. Based upon the
Agency's conclusions regarding the root cause of the inflator ruptures,
among other reasons, the recall is to be conducted on a rolling basis,
with Takata filing additional DIRs on the following schedule (which is
set forth in Paragraph 14 of the Amendment):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIR dates Zone A population Zone B population Zone C population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 16, 2016..................... All vehicles not All vehicles not All vehicles not
currently under recall currently under recall currently under recall
containing non- containing non- containing non-
desiccated frontal desiccated frontal desiccated frontal
Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators--
MY 2011 & older. MY 2008 & older. MY 2004 & older.
December 31, 2016................ All vehicles not All vehicles not All vehicles not
currently under recall currently under recall currently under recall
containing non- containing non- containing non-
desiccated frontal desiccated frontal desiccated frontal
Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators--
MY 2012 & older. MY 2009 & older. MY 2008 & older.
December 31, 2017................ All vehicles not All vehicles not All vehicles not
currently under recall currently under recall currently under recall
containing non- containing non- containing non-
desiccated frontal desiccated frontal desiccated frontal
Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators-- Takata PSAN inflators--
MY 2013 & older. MY 2010 & older. MY 2009 & older.
December 31, 2018................ All remaining vehicles All remaining vehicles All remaining vehicles
not currently under not currently under not currently under
recall containing non- recall containing non- recall containing non-
desiccated frontal desiccated frontal desiccated frontal
Takata PSAN inflators. Takata PSAN inflators. Takata PSAN inflators.
December 31, 2019................ All like for like non- All like for like non- All like for like non-
desiccated frontal desiccated frontal desiccated frontal
Takata PSAN replacement Takata PSAN replacement Takata PSAN replacement
parts. parts. parts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in Paragraph 7.a. of the Amendment, Zone A comprises
the states and U.S. territories with the greatest temperature cycling
and absolute humidity. It includes the following states and U.S.
territories: Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana,
Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam,
the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Zone B comprises states with moderate temperature cycling and
absolute humidity. It includes the following states: Arizona, Arkansas,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky,
Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West
Virginia. See Amendment at ] 7.b.
Zone C comprises states with lower temperature cycling and absolute
humidity. It includes the following states: Alaska, Colorado,
Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island,
South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. See
Amendment at ] 7.c.
The Amendment also sets forth a procedure under which the DIR
schedule above may be modified or amended. More specifically, Paragraph
17 provides:
[[Page 47856]]
Based on the presentation of additional test data, analysis, or
other relevant and appropriate evidence, by Takata, an automobile
manufacturer, or any other credible source, NHTSA may, after
consultation with Takata, alter the schedule set forth in Paragraph 14
to modify or amend a DIR or to defer certain inflator types or
vehicles, or a portion thereof, to a later DIR filing date. Any such
evidence must be submitted to NHTSA no later than one-hundred-twenty
(120) days before the relevant DIR filing date. This paragraph applies
only to the DIRs scheduled to be issued on or after December 31, 2016
under the schedule established by Paragraph 14 of this Amendment.
The Agency believes it is important to provide additional guidance
on the process and conditions under which NHTSA would consider altering
the recall schedule to modify or amend a DIR or defer the filing of a
DIR, as well as guidance on the standards and criteria that would guide
such decision-making. This process shall not be used to expedite or
expand the DIR schedule, nor shall it be used to eliminate a population
of vehicles from the recall.
II. Process and Procedure
A. Petition: No later than 120 days before the applicable DIR
filing date, Takata, a vehicle manufacturer, or other credible source
(the ``petitioner'') may petition the Agency for a modification or
amendment to the DIR schedule. The petition shall be in writing and
shall be directed to the Associate Administrator for Enforcement, with
a copy to Chief Counsel. The petition shall specify the precise
modification or amendment to the DIR schedule being requested by the
petitioner, including the affected vehicle makes, models, and model
years (the ``particular class of vehicles''). The petition shall also
set forth all data, information, and arguments of the petitioner
supporting its petition. To the extent the petitioner requests
confidential treatment under 49 CFR part 512 in connection with any
data, information, and arguments, it shall submit a publicly available
summary of such confidential materials.
B. Public Notice and Comment: Within 14 days of receiving a
petition, NHTSA shall publish a notice of the petition in the Federal
Register. The notice shall include a brief summary of the petition, a
description of the particular class of vehicles, a statement of the
availability of the petition and other relevant information for public
inspection, and an invitation to interested persons to submit written
data, information, and arguments concerning the petition to a public
docket. The notice of the petition shall also specify the deadline for
submitting data, information, and arguments concerning the petition,
which deadline shall not be less than 14 days after the Federal
Register notice.
C. Disposition of the Petition: After reviewing the written data,
views, and arguments from the petitioner and any interested persons, as
well as other available information, and after consulting with Takata,
the Associate Administrator for Enforcement shall make a decision
whether to grant or deny the petition. Notice of the grant or denial of
the petition shall be issued to the petitioner, and to Takata and any
affected vehicle manufacturer, no less than 45 days before the relevant
DIR filing date. Notice of the grant or denial of the petition shall
also be published in the Federal Register.
D. Appeal: Within 14 days of notice of a grant or denial in the
Federal Register, any interested person may appeal the grant or denial
of the petition to the Administrator. An appeal shall be in writing and
shall be directed to the Administrator, with a copy to the Chief
Counsel. The Administrator will base his final decision on the data,
information, and arguments submitted in support of the petition and
during the comment period, and other available information. The final
decision will be issued no less than 5 days before the applicable DIR
filing date. Notice of final decision shall also be published in the
Federal Register.
III. Standard of Proof
NHTSA may grant the petition if the Agency finds that the written
data, information, and arguments regarding the petition and other
available information demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that either: (i) There has not yet been, nor will be for some period of
years in the future, sufficient propellant degradation to render the
inflators contained in the particular class of vehicles unreasonably
dangerous in terms of susceptibility to rupture; or (ii) the service
life expectancy of the inflators installed in the particular class of
vehicles is sufficiently long that they will not pose an unreasonable
risk to motor vehicle safety if recalled at a later date.
The Agency may rely on any relevant criteria in determining whether
the available evidence satisfies the standard of proof. Generally, a
petitioner may satisfy the standard of proof by submitting evidence
concerning the physical attributes of the category of inflators at
issue. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, inflator
diffusion rates, booster and propellant moisture content (over time),
wafer diameter, and closed-bomb test data. In evaluating this evidence,
the Agency will closely scrutinize the number of inflators tested, the
age of the inflators tested, and the history of the vehicles from which
the inflators were removed. A petitioner may also satisfy the standard
of proof through robust predictive modeling, which modeling shall be
independently verified by NHTSA's expert, Dr. Harold Blomquist. In all
instances, a petition will be denied if there has been a rupture
incident in the field or in testing that involves the inflator type
contained in the particular class of vehicles at issue.
Applicability/Legal Statement: This Enforcement Guidance Bulletin
sets forth NHTSA's current interpretation and thinking on the process
and procedures under Paragraph 17 of the Amendment, and the standards
and criteria that will guide its decision-making. This Bulletin is not
a final agency action and is intended as guidance only. This Bulletin
is not intended, nor can it be relied upon, to create any rights
enforceable by any party against NHTSA, the Department of
Transportation, or the United States. Moreover, the process and
procedures set forth herein do not establish any defense to any
violations of the statutes and regulations that NHTSA administers. This
Bulletin may be revised without notice to reflect changes in NHTSA's
evaluation and analysis, or to clarify and update text.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., 30118, 30162, 30166(b)(1),
30166(g)(1); delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95(a).
Issued: July 15, 2016.
Mark R. Rosekind, Ph.D.
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-17356 Filed 7-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P