Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 44671-44672 [2016-16193]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Notices
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The DG
is electronically available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML15313A425.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2016–
0133 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC posts all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enters
the comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
II. Additional Information
The NRC is issuing for public
comment a DG in the NRC’s ‘‘Regulatory
Guide’’ series. This series was
developed to describe and make
available to the public information
regarding methods that are acceptable to
the NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the NRC’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific issues or postulated
events, and data that the staff needs in
its review of applications for permits
and licenses. The DG, entitled,
‘‘Dedication of Commercial-Grade Items
for Use in Nuclear Power Plants,’’ is a
proposed new guide temporarily
identified by its task number, DG–1292.
It proposes new guidance that describes
acceptance methods that the NRC staff
considers acceptable in meeting
regulatory requirements for dedication
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
of commercial-grade items used in
nuclear power plants.
POSTAL SERVICE
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
44671
Product Change—Priority Mail
Negotiated Service Agreement
DG–1292 describes a method that the
staff of the NRC considers acceptable for
dedication of commercial-grade items
for use in nuclear power plants.
Issuance of this DG, if finalized, would
not constitute backfitting as defined in
10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) and
would not otherwise be inconsistent
with the issue finality provisions in 10
CFR part 52. As discussed in the
‘‘Implementation’’ section of this DG,
the NRC has no current intention to
impose this DG, if finalized, on holders
of current operating licenses or
combined licenses.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day
of June, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Harriett Karagiannis,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guidance and
Generic Issues Branch, Division of
Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research.
[FR Doc. 2016–16215 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Effective date: July 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 1, 2016, it
filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a Request of the United
States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail Contract 231 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2016–163,
CP2016–236.
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–16161 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
POSTAL SERVICE
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
Product Change—Priority Mail
Negotiated Service Agreement
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Postal ServiceTM.
[OMB Control No. 3235–0528, SEC File No.
270–465]
Notice.
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective date: July 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179.
The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 1, 2016, it
filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a Request of the United
States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail Contract 230 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2016–162,
CP2016–235.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–16162 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sfmt 4703
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 237.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
In Canada, as in the United States,
individuals can invest a portion of their
earnings in tax-deferred retirement
savings accounts (‘‘Canadian retirement
accounts’’). These accounts, which
operate in a manner similar to
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
44672
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
individual retirement accounts in the
United States, encourage retirement
savings by permitting savings on a taxdeferred basis. Individuals who
establish Canadian retirement accounts
while living and working in Canada and
who later move to the United States
(‘‘Canadian-U.S. Participants’’ or
‘‘participants’’) often continue to hold
their retirement assets in their Canadian
retirement accounts rather than
prematurely withdrawing (or ‘‘cashing
out’’) those assets, which would result
in immediate taxation in Canada.
Once in the United States, however,
these participants historically have been
unable to manage their Canadian
retirement account investments. Most
securities that are ‘‘qualified
investments’’ for Canadian retirement
accounts are not registered under the
U.S. securities laws. Those securities,
therefore, generally cannot be publicly
offered and sold in the United States
without violating the registration
requirement of the Securities Act of
1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’).1 As a result of
this registration requirement, CanadianU.S. Participants previously were not
able to purchase or exchange securities
for their Canadian retirement accounts
as needed to meet their changing
investment goals or income needs.
The Commission issued a rulemaking
in 2000 that enabled Canadian-U.S.
Participants to manage the assets in
their Canadian retirement accounts by
providing relief from the U.S.
registration requirements for offers of
securities of foreign issuers to CanadianU.S. Participants and sales to Canadian
retirement accounts.2 Rule 237 under
the Securities Act 3 permits securities of
foreign issuers, including securities of
foreign funds, to be offered to CanadianU.S. Participants and sold to their
Canadian retirement accounts without
being registered under the Securities
Act.
Rule 237 requires written offering
documents for securities offered and
sold in reliance on the rule to disclose
prominently that the securities are not
registered with the Commission and are
1 15 U.S.C. 77. In addition, the offering and
selling of securities of investment companies
(‘‘funds’’) that are not registered pursuant to the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Investment
Company Act’’) is generally prohibited by U.S.
securities laws. 15 U.S.C. 80a.
2 See Offer and Sale of Securities to Canadian
Tax-Deferred Retirement Savings Accounts, Release
Nos. 33–7860, 34–42905, IC–24491 (June 7, 2000)
[65 FR 37672 (June 15, 2000)]. This rulemaking also
included new rule 7d–2 under the Investment
Company Act, permitting foreign funds to offer
securities to Canadian-U.S. Participants and sell
securities to Canadian retirement accounts without
registering as investment companies under the
Investment Company Act. 17 CFR 270.7d–2.
3 17 CFR 230.237.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
exempt from registration under the U.S.
securities laws. The burden under the
rule associated with adding this
disclosure to written offering documents
is minimal and is non-recurring. The
foreign issuer, underwriter, or brokerdealer can redraft an existing prospectus
or other written offering material to add
this disclosure statement, or may draft
a sticker or supplement containing this
disclosure to be added to existing
offering materials. In either case, based
on discussions with representatives of
the Canadian fund industry, the staff
estimates that it would take an average
of 10 minutes per document to draft the
requisite disclosure statement.
The Commission understands that
there are approximately 3,619 Canadian
issuers other than funds that may rely
on rule 237 to make an initial public
offering of their securities to CanadianU.S. Participants.4 The staff estimates
that in any given year approximately 36
(or 1 percent) of those issuers are likely
to rely on rule 237 to make a public
offering of their securities to
participants, and that each of those 36
issuers, on average, distributes 3
different written offering documents
concerning those securities, for a total of
108 offering documents.
The staff therefore estimates that
during each year that rule 237 is in
effect, approximately 36 respondents 5
would be required to make 108
responses by adding the new disclosure
statements to approximately 108 written
offering documents. Thus, the staff
estimates that the total annual burden
associated with the rule 237 disclosure
requirement would be approximately 18
hours (108 offering documents × 10
minutes per document). The total
annual cost of burden hours is estimated
to be $6,840 (18 hours × $380 per hour
of attorney time).6
In addition, issuers from foreign
countries other than Canada could rely
on rule 237 to offer securities to
Canadian-U.S. Participants and sell
securities to their accounts without
becoming subject to the registration
requirements of the Securities Act.
However, the staff believes that the
number of issuers from other countries
that rely on rule 237, and that therefore
are required to comply with the offering
document disclosure requirements, is
negligible.
These burden hour estimates are
based upon the Commission staff’s
experience and discussions with the
fund industry. The estimates of average
burden hours are made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act. These estimates are not derived
from a comprehensive or even a
representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules.
Compliance with the collection of
information requirements of the rule is
mandatory and is necessary to comply
with the requirements of the rule in
general. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number. Consideration will be
given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of
this publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549; or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: July 5, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–16193 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
estimate is based on the following
calculation: 3,520 equity issuers (as of April 2016)
+ 99 bond issuers (as of April 2016) = 3,619 total
issuers (as of April 2016). See World Federation of
Exchanges, Monthly Reports, available at https://
www.world-exchanges.org/home/index.php/
statistics/monthly-reports (providing number of
equity issuers listed on Canada’s Toronto Stock
Exchange). After 2009, the World Federation of
Exchanges ceased reporting the number of fixedincome issuers on Canada’s Toronto Stock
Exchange. The number of fixed-income issuers as
of April 2016 is based on the ratio of the number
of fixed-income issuers listed on Canada’s Toronto
Stock Exchange in 2009 (111) relative to the number
of bonds listed on that exchange in that year (178)
multiplied against the number of bonds listed on
that exchange as of April 2016 (159): (111/178) ×
159 = 99.
5 This estimate of respondents only includes
foreign issuers. The number of respondents would
be greater if foreign underwriters or broker-dealers
draft stickers or supplements to add the required
disclosure to existing offering documents.
6 The Commission’s estimate concerning the wage
rate for attorney time is based on salary information
PO 00000
4 This
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold an Open Meeting
on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, at 1:00 p.m.,
for the securities industry compiled by the
Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (‘‘SIFMA’’). The $380 per hour figure
for an attorney is from SIFMA’s Management &
Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry
2013, modified by Commission staff to account for
an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits,
and overhead.
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44671-44672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16193]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[OMB Control No. 3235-0528, SEC File No. 270-465]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 237.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
In Canada, as in the United States, individuals can invest a
portion of their earnings in tax-deferred retirement savings accounts
(``Canadian retirement accounts''). These accounts, which operate in a
manner similar to
[[Page 44672]]
individual retirement accounts in the United States, encourage
retirement savings by permitting savings on a tax-deferred basis.
Individuals who establish Canadian retirement accounts while living and
working in Canada and who later move to the United States (``Canadian-
U.S. Participants'' or ``participants'') often continue to hold their
retirement assets in their Canadian retirement accounts rather than
prematurely withdrawing (or ``cashing out'') those assets, which would
result in immediate taxation in Canada.
Once in the United States, however, these participants historically
have been unable to manage their Canadian retirement account
investments. Most securities that are ``qualified investments'' for
Canadian retirement accounts are not registered under the U.S.
securities laws. Those securities, therefore, generally cannot be
publicly offered and sold in the United States without violating the
registration requirement of the Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities
Act'').\1\ As a result of this registration requirement, Canadian-U.S.
Participants previously were not able to purchase or exchange
securities for their Canadian retirement accounts as needed to meet
their changing investment goals or income needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 77. In addition, the offering and selling of
securities of investment companies (``funds'') that are not
registered pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940
(``Investment Company Act'') is generally prohibited by U.S.
securities laws. 15 U.S.C. 80a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission issued a rulemaking in 2000 that enabled Canadian-
U.S. Participants to manage the assets in their Canadian retirement
accounts by providing relief from the U.S. registration requirements
for offers of securities of foreign issuers to Canadian-U.S.
Participants and sales to Canadian retirement accounts.\2\ Rule 237
under the Securities Act \3\ permits securities of foreign issuers,
including securities of foreign funds, to be offered to Canadian-U.S.
Participants and sold to their Canadian retirement accounts without
being registered under the Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Offer and Sale of Securities to Canadian Tax-Deferred
Retirement Savings Accounts, Release Nos. 33-7860, 34-42905, IC-
24491 (June 7, 2000) [65 FR 37672 (June 15, 2000)]. This rulemaking
also included new rule 7d-2 under the Investment Company Act,
permitting foreign funds to offer securities to Canadian-U.S.
Participants and sell securities to Canadian retirement accounts
without registering as investment companies under the Investment
Company Act. 17 CFR 270.7d-2.
\3\ 17 CFR 230.237.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 237 requires written offering documents for securities offered
and sold in reliance on the rule to disclose prominently that the
securities are not registered with the Commission and are exempt from
registration under the U.S. securities laws. The burden under the rule
associated with adding this disclosure to written offering documents is
minimal and is non-recurring. The foreign issuer, underwriter, or
broker-dealer can redraft an existing prospectus or other written
offering material to add this disclosure statement, or may draft a
sticker or supplement containing this disclosure to be added to
existing offering materials. In either case, based on discussions with
representatives of the Canadian fund industry, the staff estimates that
it would take an average of 10 minutes per document to draft the
requisite disclosure statement.
The Commission understands that there are approximately 3,619
Canadian issuers other than funds that may rely on rule 237 to make an
initial public offering of their securities to Canadian-U.S.
Participants.\4\ The staff estimates that in any given year
approximately 36 (or 1 percent) of those issuers are likely to rely on
rule 237 to make a public offering of their securities to participants,
and that each of those 36 issuers, on average, distributes 3 different
written offering documents concerning those securities, for a total of
108 offering documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 3,520
equity issuers (as of April 2016) + 99 bond issuers (as of April
2016) = 3,619 total issuers (as of April 2016). See World Federation
of Exchanges, Monthly Reports, available at https://www.world-exchanges.org/home/index.php/statistics/monthly-reports (providing
number of equity issuers listed on Canada's Toronto Stock Exchange).
After 2009, the World Federation of Exchanges ceased reporting the
number of fixed-income issuers on Canada's Toronto Stock Exchange.
The number of fixed-income issuers as of April 2016 is based on the
ratio of the number of fixed-income issuers listed on Canada's
Toronto Stock Exchange in 2009 (111) relative to the number of bonds
listed on that exchange in that year (178) multiplied against the
number of bonds listed on that exchange as of April 2016 (159):
(111/178) x 159 = 99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The staff therefore estimates that during each year that rule 237
is in effect, approximately 36 respondents \5\ would be required to
make 108 responses by adding the new disclosure statements to
approximately 108 written offering documents. Thus, the staff estimates
that the total annual burden associated with the rule 237 disclosure
requirement would be approximately 18 hours (108 offering documents x
10 minutes per document). The total annual cost of burden hours is
estimated to be $6,840 (18 hours x $380 per hour of attorney time).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This estimate of respondents only includes foreign issuers.
The number of respondents would be greater if foreign underwriters
or broker-dealers draft stickers or supplements to add the required
disclosure to existing offering documents.
\6\ The Commission's estimate concerning the wage rate for
attorney time is based on salary information for the securities
industry compiled by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (``SIFMA''). The $380 per hour figure for an attorney is
from SIFMA's Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities
Industry 2013, modified by Commission staff to account for an 1800-
hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm
size, employee benefits, and overhead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, issuers from foreign countries other than Canada could
rely on rule 237 to offer securities to Canadian-U.S. Participants and
sell securities to their accounts without becoming subject to the
registration requirements of the Securities Act. However, the staff
believes that the number of issuers from other countries that rely on
rule 237, and that therefore are required to comply with the offering
document disclosure requirements, is negligible.
These burden hour estimates are based upon the Commission staff's
experience and discussions with the fund industry. The estimates of
average burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act. These estimates are not derived from a comprehensive or
even a representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules.
Compliance with the collection of information requirements of the
rule is mandatory and is necessary to comply with the requirements of
the rule in general. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: July 5, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-16193 Filed 7-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P