Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 43991-43992 [2016-15834]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2016 / Notices
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The re-lender is also subject to the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act.
(a) The re-lender agrees:
(1) To have each prospective
Applicant sign Form RD 400–4,
Assurance Agreement, which assures
USDA that the recipient is in
compliance with title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 7 CFR part 15 and
other Agency regulations.
(2) That no person will be
discriminated against based on race,
color or national origin, in regard to any
program or activity for which the relender receives Federal financial
assistance.
(3) That nondiscrimination statements
are in advertisements and brochures.
(4) To collect and maintain data on
applicants by race, sex, and national
origin of the Applicants and Borrowers,
and ensure that the borrowers also
collect and maintain the same data on
the entities benefiting from those
projects.
(5) The projects supported with
Agency funds will not cause any
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority and low-income
populations.
(6) The Agency will use the above
information to complete Civil rights
compliance reviews within the first year
after the initial loan closing and
thereafter at intervals of not more than
3 years until the CF direct loan funds
have all been re-lent.
(7) For other Federal, State and Local
Requirements, see 7 CFR 1942.17(k).
(8) Any loan funds not disbursed
within 5 years of the loan to the ReLender will be deobligated and become
unavailable for disbursement.
VII. Non-Discrimination Statement
In accordance with Federal civil
rights law and U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) civil rights
regulations and policies, the USDA, its
Agencies, offices, employees, and
institutions participating in or
administering USDA programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on
race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, familial/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior
civil rights activity, in any program or
activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs).
Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means of communication for
program information (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Jul 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET
Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and
TTY) or contact USDA through the
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Additionally, program information may
be made available in languages other
than English.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, AD–
3027, found online at https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
cust.html and at any USDA office or
write a letter addressed to USDA and
provide in the letter all of the
information requested in the form. To
request a copy of the complaint form,
call (866) 632–9992, submit your
completed form or letter to USDA by:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9410;
Fax: (202) 690–7442; or
email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
Dated: June 27. 2016.
Lisa Mensah,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2016–16003 Filed 7–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–848]
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening
Agents From Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 26, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
stilbenic optical brightening agents
(OBAs) from Taiwan.1 The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2014, through
April 30, 2015. The review covers one
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, Teh Fong Ming
International Co., Ltd. (TFM). For the
final results, we find that TFM has sold
AGENCY:
1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents
From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR
9805 (February 26, 2016) (Preliminary Results) and
accompanying decision memorandum (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43991
subject merchandise at less than normal
value.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1757, and (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 26, 2016, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of
this review in the Federal Register. We
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On March 28, 2016,
TFM submitted a case brief. On April 4,
2016, Archroma U.S., Inc., a domestic
producer of merchandise, submitted a
rebuttal brief. At the request of TFM,2
we held a hearing on May 11, 2016.3
The Department conducted this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
Order 4 is OBAs and is currently
classifiable under subheadings
3204.20.8000, 2933.69.6050,
2921.59.4000 and 2921.59.8090 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). While the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description remains
dispositive.5
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief and
rebuttal brief submitted in this review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
with this notice. A list of the issues
raised is attached as an Appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
2 See
letter from TFM dated March 19, 2016.
hearing transcript, filed on the record May
17, 2016.
4 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents
From Taiwan: Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order, 77 FR 27419 (May 10, 2012) (Order).
5 A full description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain Stilbenic
Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
3 See
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
43992
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2016 / Notices
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have not made
changes to the Preliminary Results. For
a discussion of our analysis of the
comments received, see Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
For the final results of this review, in
accordance with sections 776(a) and (b)
of the Act, we continued to rely on facts
available with an adverse inference to
establish a rate of 6.19 percent as the
weighted-average dumping margin for
TFM for the period May 1, 2014,
through April 30, 2015. As the
Department explained in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the
6.19 percent rate is the highest applied
margin in a separate segment of the
same proceeding, and according to
776(c)(2) of the Act, this rate does not
require corroboration.6
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
apply an ad valorem assessment rate of
6.19 percent to all entries of subject
merchandise during the POR which
were produced and/or exported by
TFM. We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of OBAs from Taiwan
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for TFM will be 6.19 percent, the
weighted average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for other
manufacturers and exporters covered in
a prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 6.19
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less than fair value investigation.7
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Questionnaire Original
Deadline
Comment 2: Hindrance of Proceeding
Comment 3: Opportunity To Remedy
Under the Statute and Regulations
Comment 4: Untimely Extension Request
Due to Extraordinary Circumstances
Comment 5: Per Se Rule Decision Making
Comment 6: Focus on Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) Rate and Not on
Decision To Apply AFA
Comment 7: Rejection Letter Attachment
Comment 8: Addressing the Facts of the
Case
Comment 9: Neutral Facts Available
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–15834 Filed 7–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Meeting of the United States
Manufacturing Council
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.
AGENCY:
The United States
Manufacturing Council (Council) will
hold an open meeting via teleconference
on Wednesday, July 20, 2016. The
Council was established in April 2004
to advise the Secretary of Commerce on
matters relating to the U.S.
manufacturing industry. The purpose of
the meeting is for Council members to
review and deliberate on proposed
recommendations by the Innovation,
Research, and Development
Subcommittee focused on the transition
of the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority. The final agenda will be
posted on the Department of Commerce
Web site for the Council at https://
www.trade.gov/manufacturingcouncil/,
at least one week in advance of the
meeting.
SUMMARY:
Wednesday, July 20, 12 p.m.–1
p.m. The deadline for members of the
public to register, including requests to
make comments during the meeting and
for auxiliary aids, or to submit written
comments for dissemination prior to the
meeting, is 5 p.m. EDT on July 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by
conference call. The call-in number and
passcode will be provided by email to
registrants. Requests to register
(including to speak or for auxiliary aids)
and any written comments should be
submitted to: U.S. Manufacturing
Council, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC, 20230; email:
archana.sahgal@trade.gov. Members of
the public are encouraged to submit
registration requests and written
comments via email to ensure timely
receipt.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
6 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Jul 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
7 The
all-others rate established in the Order.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Archana Sahgal, U.S. Manufacturing
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43991-43992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15834]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-848]
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From Taiwan: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 26, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain stilbenic optical
brightening agents (OBAs) from Taiwan.\1\ The period of review (POR) is
May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015. The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise, Teh Fong Ming International Co.,
Ltd. (TFM). For the final results, we find that TFM has sold subject
merchandise at less than normal value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 9805 (February 26, 2016) (Preliminary
Results) and accompanying decision memorandum (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1757, and (202)
482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 26, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary
Results of this review in the Federal Register. We invited parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results. On March 28, 2016, TFM submitted a
case brief. On April 4, 2016, Archroma U.S., Inc., a domestic producer
of merchandise, submitted a rebuttal brief. At the request of TFM,\2\
we held a hearing on May 11, 2016.\3\ The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See letter from TFM dated March 19, 2016.
\3\ See hearing transcript, filed on the record May 17, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order \4\ is OBAs and is currently
classifiable under subheadings 3204.20.8000, 2933.69.6050, 2921.59.4000
and 2921.59.8090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written product description remains
dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From
Taiwan: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27419 (May 10, 2012) (Order).
\5\ A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in
the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Certain Stilbenic
Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief and rebuttal brief submitted in
this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which
is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues raised is
attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
[[Page 43992]]
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have not made
changes to the Preliminary Results. For a discussion of our analysis of
the comments received, see Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
For the final results of this review, in accordance with sections
776(a) and (b) of the Act, we continued to rely on facts available with
an adverse inference to establish a rate of 6.19 percent as the
weighted-average dumping margin for TFM for the period May 1, 2014,
through April 30, 2015. As the Department explained in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, the 6.19 percent rate is the highest applied
margin in a separate segment of the same proceeding, and according to
776(c)(2) of the Act, this rate does not require corroboration.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 6.19 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/
or exported by TFM. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days
after publication of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of OBAs from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for TFM will be
6.19 percent, the weighted average dumping margin established in the
final results of this administrative review; (2) for other
manufacturers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 6.19 percent, the all-
others rate established in the less than fair value investigation.\7\
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The all-others rate established in the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Questionnaire Original Deadline
Comment 2: Hindrance of Proceeding
Comment 3: Opportunity To Remedy Under the Statute and
Regulations
Comment 4: Untimely Extension Request Due to Extraordinary
Circumstances
Comment 5: Per Se Rule Decision Making
Comment 6: Focus on Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Rate and Not
on Decision To Apply AFA
Comment 7: Rejection Letter Attachment
Comment 8: Addressing the Facts of the Case
Comment 9: Neutral Facts Available
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-15834 Filed 7-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P