Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation, 43243-43244 [2016-15627]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2016 / Notices
both Eko Brands and Espresso Supply,
Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). ARM
alleges that Espresso Supply, Inc.,
should be subject to the enforcement
proceeding because it purchased the
Eko Brands company in November of
2015.
Having examined the enforcement
complaint and the supporting
documents, the Commission has
determined to institute a formal
enforcement proceeding to determine
whether Respondents are in violation of
the March 17, 2016 limited exclusion
order and cease and desist order issued
in the original investigation and what, if
any, enforcement measures are
appropriate. The following entities are
named as parties to the formal
enforcement proceeding: (1)
Complainants Adrian Rivera and Adrian
Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc.; (2)
respondents Eko Brands and Espresso
Supply, Inc.; and (3) OUII.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.75 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.75).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 27, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–15612 Filed 6–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1012]
Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes
and Cartridges Containing the Same
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
27, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of FUJIFILM
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.
of Bedford, Massachusetts. Supplements
to the complaint were filed on June 6,
8, and 10, 2016. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain magnetic data storage tapes and
cartridges containing the same by reason
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,641,891 (‘‘the ’891 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,703,106 (‘‘the ’106 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,703,101 (‘‘the ’101
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,767,612 (‘‘the
’612 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,236,434
(‘‘the ’434 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
7,355,805 (‘‘the ’805 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2016).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
June 27, 2016, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain magnetic data
storage tapes and cartridges containing
the same by reason of infringement of
one or more of claims 1, 4–9, 11, and 14
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43243
of the ’891 patent; claims 2, 5, and 6 of
the ’106 patent; claim 1 of the ’101
patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7–11 of the
’612 patent; claim 1 of the ’434 patent;
and claims 3 and 10 of the ’805 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1).
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
FUJIFILM Corporation, 7–3 Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052,
Japan
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.,
45 Crosby Dr., Bedford, MA 01730–
1401
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
¯
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan
Sony Corporation of America, 550
Madison Avenue, New York, NY
10022
Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via
Esprillo Building 1, San Diego, CA
92127
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
43244
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2016 / Notices
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 27, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–15627 Filed 6–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
The complainant request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order, or in the
alternative a limited exclusion order,
and cease and desist orders.
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1011]
Certain Inkjet Printers, Printheads, and
Ink Cartridges, Components Thereof,
and Products Containing Same;
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
27, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of HP Inc. of Palo Alto,
California. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain inkjet printers, printheads, and
ink cartridges, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,270,201 (‘‘the ’201 Patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,491,377 (‘‘the ’377
Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,260,952 (‘‘the
’952 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,004,564
(‘‘the ’564 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,090,343 (‘‘the ’343 Patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 7,744,202 (‘‘the ’202 Patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2016).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
June 27, 2016, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain inkjet printers,
printheads, and ink cartridges,
components thereof, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
1–3, 6, 13–15, 17, 23–25, 28–30, 35, and
37 of the ’201 patent; claims 22–24 of
the ’377 patent; claims 1–3, 5–8, 10, 13,
14, and 16 of the ’952 patent; claims 1–
24 of the ’564 patent; claims 1–22 of the
’343 patent; and claims 1–6, 9–12, 16,
18, 21, 23, and 26–30 of the ’202 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: HP Inc., 1501
Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California
94304–1185.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Memjet, Ltd., 61/62 Fitzwilliam Lane,
Dublin 2, Ireland
Memjet US Services, Inc., 10918
Technology Place, San Diego,
California 92127
Memjet Home and Office, Inc., 923
South Bridgeway Place, Suite 220,
Eagle, Idaho 83616
Memjet North Ryde Pty Ltd., 6–8 Lyon
Park Road, North Ryde, New South
Wales, 2113, Australia
Memjet Technology Ltd., 61/62
Fitzwilliam Lane, Dublin 2, Ireland
Memjet Holdings Ltd., 61/62
Fitzwilliam Lane, Dublin 2, Ireland
Afinia LLC (d/b/a Afinia Label), 8150
Mallory Court, Chanhassen,
Minnesota 55317
Astro Machine Corporation, 630 Lively
Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
60007
Colordyne Technologies, LLC, 3275
Intertech Drive, Suite 100, Brookfield,
Wisconsin 53045
Formax Technologies, Inc., 1 Education
Way, Dover, New Hampshire 03820
Neopost USA, Inc., (d/b/a Neopost
Northwest, Neopost Northeast,
Neopost Priority Systems, and/or
Neopost Southeast), 478 Wheelers
Farms Road, Milford, Connecticut
06461
Printware LLC, 2935 Waters Road, Suite
160, Eagan, Minnesota 55121
VIPColor Technologies USA, Inc., 6737
Mowry Avenue, Newark, California
94560
ABC Office (d/b/a Brent Barlow), 1142
West Flint Meadow Drive, Kaysville,
Utah 84037
All for Mailers, Inc., 4 Roland Avenue,
Feasterville, Pennsylvania 19053
Fernqvist Labeling Solutions, Inc., 2544
Leghorn Street, Mountain View,
California 94043
Information Management Services LLC,
(d/b/a MyBinding.com), 5500 N.E.
Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124
JMP Business Systems, Inc., 1450
Tollhouse Road, No. 103, Clovis,
California 93611
Mono Machines LLC, 1133 Broadway
Suite 706, New York, New York
10010
Ordway Corporation, (d/b/a Print &
Finishing Solutions), 1632 Sierra
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43243-43244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15627]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1012]
Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the
Same Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 27, 2016, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
FUJIFILM Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media
U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts. Supplements to the complaint
were filed on June 6, 8, and 10, 2016. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges
containing the same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,641,891 (``the '891 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,106 (``the '106
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,101 (``the '101 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 6,767,612 (``the '612 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,236,434 (``the
'434 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,355,805 (``the '805 patent'').
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2016).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on June 27, 2016, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic
data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 14 of the '891
patent; claims 2, 5, and 6 of the '106 patent; claim 1 of the '101
patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7-11 of the '612 patent; claim 1 of the
'434 patent; and claims 3 and 10 of the '805 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1).
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
FUJIFILM Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052,
Japan
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Dr., Bedford, MA
01730-1401
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 K[omacr]nan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan
Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022
Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via Esprillo Building 1, San Diego, CA
92127
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
[[Page 43244]]
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 27, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-15627 Filed 6-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
