Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation, 43243-43244 [2016-15627]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2016 / Notices both Eko Brands and Espresso Supply, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). ARM alleges that Espresso Supply, Inc., should be subject to the enforcement proceeding because it purchased the Eko Brands company in November of 2015. Having examined the enforcement complaint and the supporting documents, the Commission has determined to institute a formal enforcement proceeding to determine whether Respondents are in violation of the March 17, 2016 limited exclusion order and cease and desist order issued in the original investigation and what, if any, enforcement measures are appropriate. The following entities are named as parties to the formal enforcement proceeding: (1) Complainants Adrian Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc.; (2) respondents Eko Brands and Espresso Supply, Inc.; and (3) OUII. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.75 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.75). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 27, 2016. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2016–15612 Filed 6–30–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1012] Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 27, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of FUJIFILM Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts. Supplements to the complaint were filed on June 6, 8, and 10, 2016. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:05 Jun 30, 2016 Jkt 238001 of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,641,891 (‘‘the ’891 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,106 (‘‘the ’106 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,101 (‘‘the ’101 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,767,612 (‘‘the ’612 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,236,434 (‘‘the ’434 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,355,805 (‘‘the ’805 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2016). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 27, 2016, Ordered That— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 4–9, 11, and 14 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 43243 of the ’891 patent; claims 2, 5, and 6 of the ’106 patent; claim 1 of the ’101 patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7–11 of the ’612 patent; claim 1 of the ’434 patent; and claims 3 and 10 of the ’805 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1). (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: FUJIFILM Corporation, 7–3 Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052, Japan FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Dr., Bedford, MA 01730– 1401 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: ¯ Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022 Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via Esprillo Building 1, San Diego, CA 92127 (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 43244 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2016 / Notices complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 27, 2016. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2016–15627 Filed 6–30–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION The complainant request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [Investigation No. 337–TA–1011] Certain Inkjet Printers, Printheads, and Ink Cartridges, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 27, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of HP Inc. of Palo Alto, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain inkjet printers, printheads, and ink cartridges, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,270,201 (‘‘the ’201 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,491,377 (‘‘the ’377 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,260,952 (‘‘the ’952 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,004,564 (‘‘the ’564 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,090,343 (‘‘the ’343 Patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,744,202 (‘‘the ’202 Patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:05 Jun 30, 2016 Jkt 238001 Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2016). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 27, 2016, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain inkjet printers, printheads, and ink cartridges, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–3, 6, 13–15, 17, 23–25, 28–30, 35, and 37 of the ’201 patent; claims 22–24 of the ’377 patent; claims 1–3, 5–8, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of the ’952 patent; claims 1– 24 of the ’564 patent; claims 1–22 of the ’343 patent; and claims 1–6, 9–12, 16, 18, 21, 23, and 26–30 of the ’202 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304–1185. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Memjet, Ltd., 61/62 Fitzwilliam Lane, Dublin 2, Ireland Memjet US Services, Inc., 10918 Technology Place, San Diego, California 92127 Memjet Home and Office, Inc., 923 South Bridgeway Place, Suite 220, Eagle, Idaho 83616 Memjet North Ryde Pty Ltd., 6–8 Lyon Park Road, North Ryde, New South Wales, 2113, Australia Memjet Technology Ltd., 61/62 Fitzwilliam Lane, Dublin 2, Ireland Memjet Holdings Ltd., 61/62 Fitzwilliam Lane, Dublin 2, Ireland Afinia LLC (d/b/a Afinia Label), 8150 Mallory Court, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Astro Machine Corporation, 630 Lively Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007 Colordyne Technologies, LLC, 3275 Intertech Drive, Suite 100, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045 Formax Technologies, Inc., 1 Education Way, Dover, New Hampshire 03820 Neopost USA, Inc., (d/b/a Neopost Northwest, Neopost Northeast, Neopost Priority Systems, and/or Neopost Southeast), 478 Wheelers Farms Road, Milford, Connecticut 06461 Printware LLC, 2935 Waters Road, Suite 160, Eagan, Minnesota 55121 VIPColor Technologies USA, Inc., 6737 Mowry Avenue, Newark, California 94560 ABC Office (d/b/a Brent Barlow), 1142 West Flint Meadow Drive, Kaysville, Utah 84037 All for Mailers, Inc., 4 Roland Avenue, Feasterville, Pennsylvania 19053 Fernqvist Labeling Solutions, Inc., 2544 Leghorn Street, Mountain View, California 94043 Information Management Services LLC, (d/b/a MyBinding.com), 5500 N.E. Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 JMP Business Systems, Inc., 1450 Tollhouse Road, No. 103, Clovis, California 93611 Mono Machines LLC, 1133 Broadway Suite 706, New York, New York 10010 Ordway Corporation, (d/b/a Print & Finishing Solutions), 1632 Sierra E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43243-43244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1012]


Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the 
Same Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 27, 2016, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
FUJIFILM Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media 
U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts. Supplements to the complaint 
were filed on June 6, 8, and 10, 2016. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges 
containing the same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 
6,641,891 (``the '891 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,106 (``the '106 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,703,101 (``the '101 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 6,767,612 (``the '612 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,236,434 (``the 
'434 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,355,805 (``the '805 patent''). 
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States 
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in 
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 
CFR 210.10 (2016).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 27, 2016, Ordered That--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic 
data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of 
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 14 of the '891 
patent; claims 2, 5, and 6 of the '106 patent; claim 1 of the '101 
patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7-11 of the '612 patent; claim 1 of the 
'434 patent; and claims 3 and 10 of the '805 patent, and whether an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), 
(f)(1), (g)(1).
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

FUJIFILM Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052, 
Japan
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Dr., Bedford, MA 
01730-1401

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 K[omacr]nan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan
Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022
Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via Esprillo Building 1, San Diego, CA 
92127

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the

[[Page 43244]]

complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: June 27, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-15627 Filed 6-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P