Certain Inflatable Products With Tensioning Structures and Processes for Making the Same; Institution of Investigation, 41346-41347 [2016-14946]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
41346
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions.—Each party to
the reviews may submit a prehearing
brief to the Commission. Prehearing
briefs must conform with the provisions
of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is October
19, 2016. Parties may also file written
testimony in connection with their
presentation at the hearing, as provided
in section 207.24 of the Commission’s
rules, and posthearing briefs, which
must conform with the provisions of
section 207.67 of the Commission’s
rules. The deadline for filing
posthearing briefs is November 4, 2016.
In addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the
reviews may submit a written statement
of information pertinent to the subject of
the reviews on or before November 4,
2016. On November 30, 2016, the
Commission will make available to
parties all information on which they
have not had an opportunity to
comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before December 2, 2016, but such final
comments must not contain new factual
information and must otherwise comply
with section 207.68 of the Commission’s
rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing.
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
The Commission has determined that
these reviews are extraordinarily
complicated and therefore has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 20, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–14947 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1009]
Certain Inflatable Products With
Tensioning Structures and Processes
for Making the Same; Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
19, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Intex Recreation
Corp. of Long Beach, California and
Intex Marketing Ltd. of Tortola, British
Virgin Islands. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on June 1, 2016.
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain inflatable
products with tensioning structures and
processes for making the same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,562,773 (‘‘the ’773 patent’’)
and U.S. Patent No. 9,156,203 (‘‘the ’203
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2015).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
June 20, 2016, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain inflatable
products with tensioning structures and
processes for making the same by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims
1–5 of the ’773 patent and claims 1, 6–
10, and 12–29 of the ’203 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Notwithstanding any Commission
Rules that would otherwise apply, the
presiding Administrative Law Judge
shall hold an early evidentiary hearing,
find facts, and issue an early decision,
as to whether the complainant has
satisfied the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement. Any
such decision shall be in the form of an
initial determination (ID). Petitions for
review of such an ID shall be due five
calendar days after service of the ID; any
replies shall be due three business days
after service of a petition. The ID will
become the Commission’s final
determination 30 days after the date of
service of the ID unless the Commission
determines to review the ID. Any such
review will be conducted in accordance
with Commission Rules 210.43, 210.44,
and 210.45, 19 CFR 210.43, 210.44, and
210.45. The Commission expects the
issuance of an early ID relating to the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement within 100 days of
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
institution, except that the presiding
ALJ may grant a limited extension of the
ID for good cause shown. The issuance
of an early ID finding that complainants
do not satisfy the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement shall
stay the investigation unless the
Commission orders otherwise; any other
decision shall not stay the investigation
or delay the issuance of a final ID
covering the other issues of the
investigation.
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Intex Recreation Corp., 4001 Via Oro
Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90810
Intex Marketing Ltd., Wickham’s Cay,
P.O. Box 662, Road Town, Tortola,
British Virgin Islands
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Bestway (USA), Inc., 3249 East Harbour
Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Bestway Global Holdings, Inc., No. 3065
Cao An Road, Shanghai 201812,
China
Bestway (Hong Kong) International,
Ltd., 66 Mody Road, Kowloon, Hong
Kong
Bestway Inflatables & Materials
Corporation, No. 3065 Cao An Road,
Shanghai 201812, China
Bestway (Nantong) Recreation Corp.,
No. 8 Huimin West Road, Economic
Development Zone, Rucheng Town,
Nantong, Jiangsu 226503, China
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 20, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–14946 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–994]
Certain Portable Electronic Devices
and Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Intervenor Status to Google,
Inc.
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 5) granting intervenor status
to Google Inc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41347
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 11, 2016, based on a complaint
filed by Creative Technology Ltd. of
Singapore and Creative Labs, Inc. of
Milpitas, California (collectively,
‘‘Creative’’). 81 Fed. Reg. 29307–08. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale after importation of certain portable
electronic devices and components
thereof that infringe certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 6,928,433. Id. at 29307.
The notice of investigation named as
respondents ZTE Corporation of
Guangdong, China; ZTE (USA) Inc. of
Richardson, Texas; Sony Corporation of
Tokyo, Japan; Sony Mobile
Communications, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan;
Sony Mobile Communications AB of
Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile
Communications (USA), Inc. of Atlanta,
Georgia; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
of Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield
Park, New Jersey; LG Electronics, Inc. of
Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG Electronics
U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey; LG Electronics Mobilecomm
U.S.A. Inc. of San Diego, California;
Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China;
Lenovo (United States) Inc. of
Morrisville, North Carolina; Motorola
Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; HTC
Corporation of Taiwan; HTC America,
Inc. of Bellevue, Washington;
Blackberry Ltd. of Waterloo, Ontario,
Canada; and Blackberry Corporation of
Irving, Texas. Id. at 29307–08. The
notice also named the Office of Unfair
Import Investigations as a party. Id. at
29308.
On May 13, 2016, Google Inc.
(‘‘Google’’) moved to intervene as a
party in the investigation on the
grounds that Creative’s allegations
involve the functionality of Google’s
Play Music application, and Google has
an interest in defending its application.
On May 19, 2016, the Commission
Investigative Attorney filed a response
supporting Google’s Motion. Creative
stated that it would not respond to the
motion, and no other responses were
filed.
On May 19, 2016, the ALJ granted the
motion and issued the subject ID. He
found that the motion complied with 19
CFR 210.19 and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 24, and thus granted Google
intervenor status will full participation
rights as a party. No petitions for review
of the subject ID were filed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41346-41347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1009]
Certain Inflatable Products With Tensioning Structures and
Processes for Making the Same; Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 19, 2016, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Intex Recreation Corp. of Long Beach, California and Intex Marketing
Ltd. of Tortola, British Virgin Islands. A supplement to the complaint
was filed on June 1, 2016. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain inflatable products with tensioning
structures and processes for making the same by reason of infringement
of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,562,773 (``the '773 patent'')
and U.S. Patent No. 9,156,203 (``the '203 patent''). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2015).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on June 20, 2016, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain inflatable
products with tensioning structures and processes for making the same
by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-5 of the '773
patent and claims 1, 6-10, and 12-29 of the '203 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337;
(2) Notwithstanding any Commission Rules that would otherwise
apply, the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall hold an early
evidentiary hearing, find facts, and issue an early decision, as to
whether the complainant has satisfied the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement. Any such decision shall be in the form
of an initial determination (ID). Petitions for review of such an ID
shall be due five calendar days after service of the ID; any replies
shall be due three business days after service of a petition. The ID
will become the Commission's final determination 30 days after the date
of service of the ID unless the Commission determines to review the ID.
Any such review will be conducted in accordance with Commission Rules
210.43, 210.44, and 210.45, 19 CFR 210.43, 210.44, and 210.45. The
Commission expects the issuance of an early ID relating to the economic
prong of the domestic industry requirement within 100 days of
[[Page 41347]]
institution, except that the presiding ALJ may grant a limited
extension of the ID for good cause shown. The issuance of an early ID
finding that complainants do not satisfy the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement shall stay the investigation unless the
Commission orders otherwise; any other decision shall not stay the
investigation or delay the issuance of a final ID covering the other
issues of the investigation.
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Intex Recreation Corp., 4001 Via Oro Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90810
Intex Marketing Ltd., Wickham's Cay, P.O. Box 662, Road Town, Tortola,
British Virgin Islands
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Bestway (USA), Inc., 3249 East Harbour Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Bestway Global Holdings, Inc., No. 3065 Cao An Road, Shanghai 201812,
China
Bestway (Hong Kong) International, Ltd., 66 Mody Road, Kowloon, Hong
Kong
Bestway Inflatables & Materials Corporation, No. 3065 Cao An Road,
Shanghai 201812, China
Bestway (Nantong) Recreation Corp., No. 8 Huimin West Road, Economic
Development Zone, Rucheng Town, Nantong, Jiangsu 226503, China
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 20, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-14946 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P