Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Adopting New NYSE MKT Rules 2090-Equities (Know Your Customer) and 2111-Equities (Suitability) That Are Substantially Similar to FINRA Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability), Deleting Current NYSE MKT Rule 405-Equities (Diligence as to Accounts), and Making Other Conforming Changes, 41364-41368 [2016-14933]
Download as PDF
41364
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.38
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2016–089 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–089. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
38 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2016–089 and should be
submitted on or before July 15, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.39
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–14929 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78106; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–59]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Adopting New NYSE MKT
Rules 2090—Equities (Know Your
Customer) and 2111—Equities
(Suitability) That Are Substantially
Similar to FINRA Rules 2090 (Know
Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability),
Deleting Current NYSE MKT Rule 405—
Equities (Diligence as to Accounts),
and Making Other Conforming
Changes
June 20, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’
or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that
on June 9, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
39 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes adopting new
rule text that is substantially similar to
Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and
2111 (Suitability) of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’), (2) deleting current Rule
405—Equities (Diligence as to Accounts)
(‘‘Rule 405’’), and (3) making other
conforming changes. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules to harmonize with certain FINRA
rules. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes (1) adopting new rule text that
is substantially similar to FINRA Rules
2090 and 2111; (2) deleting Rule 405; 4
and (3) making other conforming
changes.
Background
In 2007, FINRA and the Exchange’s
affiliate the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) 5 entered into an
4 References to rules are to NYSE MKT rules
unless otherwise indicated.
5 NYSE Regulation, Inc., a former not-for-profit
subsidiary of the NYSE, was also a party to the
Agreement by virtue of the fact that it performed
regulatory functions for the NYSE pursuant to a
delegation agreement. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53382 (February 27, 2006), 71 FR
11251, 11264–65 (March 6, 2006) (SR–NYSE–2005–
77) (approving delegation agreement). NYSE
Regulation also performed regulatory services for
the Exchange pursuant to an intercompany
Regulatory Services Agreement (‘‘RSA’’) that gave
the Exchange the contractual right to review NYSE
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
agreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) pursuant
to Rule 17d–2 under the Act to reduce
regulatory duplication by allocating to
FINRA certain regulatory
responsibilities for NYSE rules and rule
interpretations (‘‘FINRA Incorporated
NYSE Rules’’).6 NYSE MKT became a
party to the Agreement effective
December 15, 2008.7
In order to reduce regulatory
duplication and relieve firms that are
members of the Exchange, the NYSE
and FINRA of conflicting or
unnecessary regulatory burdens, FINRA
has been reviewing and amending the
NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE
Rules in order to create a consolidated
FINRA rulebook.8 As part of the rule
consolidation process, in 2010, FINRA
harmonized NASD and FINRA
Incorporated NYSE Rules and
interpretations concerning know your
customer and suitability.9 In its filing,
FINRA (1) adopted FINRA Rules 2090
(Know Your Customer) and 2090
(Suitability), and (2) deleted NASD Rule
2310 (Recommendations to Customers
(Suitability)) and NYSE Rule 405
(Diligence as to Accounts) as well as
NYSE Rule Interpretations 405/01
through/04. The rule change was
effective July 9, 2012.10
Regulation’s performance. The delegation
agreement and related RSA terminated on February
16, 2016, and NYSE Regulation has ceased
providing regulatory services to the Exchange,
which has re-integrated its regulatory functions.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148
(July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order
approving the Agreement); 56147 (July 26, 2007), 72
FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR–NASD–2007–054)
(order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE
Rules as ‘‘Common Rules’’). Paragraph 2(b) of the
Agreement sets forth procedures regarding
proposed changes by FINRA or the Exchange to the
substance of any of the Common Rules.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148
(July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order
approving the Agreement); 56147 (July 26, 2007), 72
FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR–NASD–2007–054)
(order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE
Rules as ‘‘Common Rules’’); 60409 (July 30, 2009),
74 FR 39353 (August 6, 2009) (order approving the
amended and restated Agreement, adding NYSE
MKT LLC as a party). Paragraph 2(b) of the
Agreement sets forth procedures regarding
proposed changes by FINRA, NYSE or NYSE MKT
to the substance of any of the Common Rules.
8 FINRA’s rulebook currently has three sets of
rules: (1) NASD Rules, (2) FINRA Incorporated
NYSE Rules, and (3) consolidated FINRA Rules.
The FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to
those members of FINRA that are also members of
the NYSE (‘‘Dual Members’’), while the
consolidated FINRA Rules apply to all FINRA
members. For more information about the FINRA
rulebook consolidation process, see FINRA
Information Notice, March 12, 2008.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63325
((November 17, 2010), 75 FR 71479 (November 23,
2010) (SR–FINRA–2010–039) (‘‘FINRA Know Your
Customer and Suitability Approval’’).
10 See FINRA Regulatory Notice 11–25 (May
2011). The original effective date was October 7,
2011.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Currently, the Exchange does not have
separate rules for know your customer
and suitability. Rather, Rule 405, based
on NYSE Rule 405,11 requires every
member organization, through a
principal executive or a person or
persons designated under the provisions
of Rule 3110(a), to take certain actions
relative to customers and customer
accounts. First, Rule 405(1) requires
member organizations to use ‘‘due
diligence’’ to learn the ‘‘essential facts
relative to every customer, every order,
every cash or margin account accepted
or carried by such organization and
every person holding power of attorney
over any account accepted or carried by
such organization.’’ Second, Rule 405(2)
requires member organizations to
supervise diligently all accounts
handled by registered representatives.
Finally, Rule 405(3) requires persons
designated by the member to be
informed of the essential facts relative to
the customer and to the nature of the
proposed account prior to approving the
opening of the account.
Supplementary Material .10 of Rule
405 generally discusses the
requirements that firms know their
customers and imposes specific
knowledge and due diligence
requirements in connection with the
authority of third parties to act on behalf
of customers that are legal entities,
including margin accounts carried by a
member organization for a non-member
corporation, cash accounts carried for a
non-member corporation, and agency
accounts carried by a member
organization.12 Supplementary Material
.20 of Rule 405 refers to the
requirements of Rule 4311 concerning
the permitted allocation of
responsibilities between introducing
and carrying organizations.
Supplementary Material .30 cross
references to Rule 414 (Index and
Currency Warrants).13
11 The NYSE recently made a similar filing to
delete Rule 405 and its related interpretations and
adopt new NYSE Rules 2090 and 2111 based on
FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 77838 (May 16, 2016), 81
FR 31974 (May 20, 2016) (SR–NYSE–2016–33).
12 As discussed below, the Exchange believes that
Supplementary Material .10 of Rule 405—Equities
is redundant of proposed Rule 2090 and proposed
Supplementary Material .01 thereof that would
require firms to know the essential facts concerning
every customer.
13 NYSE Rule 414 provides that Rule 723
(Suitability) applies to recommendations in
currency warrants, currency index warrants and
stock index warrants. When the Exchange adopted
the NYSE’s rules in 2008, however, NYSE Rule 414
was not adopted. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58265 (July 30, 2008), 73 FR 46075,
46078 (August 7, 2008) (SR–Amex–2008–63). The
Exchange believes that the other cross references in
Rule 405 are either no longer necessary or moot.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41365
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete
current Rule 405 as either duplicative
of, or not aligned with, the proposed
know your customer and suitability
requirements discussed below, and
adopt the text of FINRA Rules 2090 and
2111.14
Proposed Rule 2090—Equities (Know
Your Customer)
Like FINRA Rule 2090, proposed Rule
2090—Equities (‘‘Rule 2090’’) would
encompass the ‘‘main ethical standard’’
of Rule 405(1).15 The proposed rule
would require every ‘‘member
organization through a principal
executive or a person or persons
designated under the provisions of Rule
3110(a)’’ 16 to use ‘‘reasonable
diligence,’’ with regard to the opening
and maintenance of every account, in
order to know and retain the essential
facts concerning every customer. The
proposed supplementary material
would define ‘‘essential facts’’ as those
‘‘required to (a) effectively service the
customer’s account, (b) act in
accordance with any special handling
instructions for the account, (c)
understand the authority of each person
acting on behalf of the customer, and (d)
comply with applicable laws,
regulations, and rules.’’ 17 The proposed
rule would be identical to FINRA Rule
2090 except that the proposed rule
would use the term ‘‘member
organization’’ rather than ‘‘member,’’
which has different meanings under
FINRA and Exchange rules.18
14 The technical and conforming changes are that
the Exchange would (1) substitute the term
‘‘member organization’’ for ‘‘member’’ (see note 18,
infra), (2) substitute the term ‘‘Exchange’’ for
‘‘FINRA,’’ (3) change certain cross-references to
FINRA rules to cross-references to Exchange rules,
and (4) add references to proposed Rules 2090—
Equities and 2111—Equities in Rule 3170 (Tape
Recording of Registered Persons by Certain Firms).
15 FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability
Approval, 75 FR at 71480.
16 This is the current formulation in Rule 405,
which the Exchange proposes to retain.
17 See Proposed Rule 2090.01. Like FINRA, the
Exchange does not propose to incorporate the
requirement in NYSE Rule 405(1) to learn the
essential facts relative to ‘‘every order.’’ The
Exchange agrees with FINRA that the application of
existing order-handling rules renders this
formulation unnecessary. See FINRA Know Your
Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71480.
Further, the Exchange’s proposed suitability rule
would also require member organizations and
persons associated with a member organization to
use reasonable diligence to understand the
securities and strategies they recommend, further
obviating the need for this language. See id.
18 Under FINRA Rules, a ‘‘member’’ means
individual, partnership, corporation or other legal
entity admitted to membership in FINRA under
Articles III and IV of the FINRA By-Laws. See
FINRA Rule 0160(b)(10). Article III, Sec. 1(a)
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
Continued
24JNN1
41366
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Rule 2111—Equities
(Suitability)
Proposed Rule 2111—Equities (‘‘Rule
2111’’), like its FINRA counterpart,
would require a member organization or
person associated with a member
organization 19 to have a ‘‘reasonable
basis’’ to believe that a recommended
transaction or investment strategy
involving a security or securities is
suitable for the customer. This
assessment would be based on the
information obtained through the
reasonable diligence of the member
organization or person associated with a
member organization to ascertain the
customer’s investment profile, which
includes, but is not limited to, the
customer’s age, other investments,
financial situation and needs, tax status,
investment objectives, investment
experience, investment time horizon,
liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and any
other information the customer may
disclose to the member organization or
person associated with a member
organization in connection with such
recommendation.20 Like the FINRA
generally limits membership to registered brokers,
dealers, municipal securities brokers or dealers, or
government securities brokers or dealers. NYSE
MKT’s equivalent term is ‘‘member organization.’’
See Rule 2(b)(i)—Equities (defining ‘‘member
organization’’ as a registered broker or dealer
(unless exempt pursuant to the Act) that is a
member of FINRA or another registered securities
exchange). Under Rule 2(a)—Equities, the term
‘‘member’’ means a natural person associated with
a member organization who has been approved by
the Exchange and designated by such member
organization to effect transactions on the floor of the
Exchange or any facility thereof. A ‘‘member’’ is not
a registered broker-dealer and does not have
employees; only member organizations have
employees. For purposes of the proposed
amendments to its disciplinary rules, the Exchange
proposes to continue using the phrase ‘‘covered
person’’ to indicate employees of a member
organization. As noted below, for purposes of the
proposed change, the Exchange proposes to
continue using the phrase ‘‘person associated with
a member organization’’ to indicate employees of a
member organization for purposes of proposed Rule
2111.
19 As proposed, Rule 2111 is identical to FINRA
Rule 2111 except that the Exchange proposes to use
the phrase ‘‘member organization or person
associated with a member organization’’ rather than
‘‘member or an associated person’’ to indicate the
coverage of the rule. As discussed above, ‘‘member’’
and ‘‘member organization’’ have different
meanings under NYSE MKT and FINRA rules, and
under the Exchange’s rules only member
organizations can have employees. See note 16,
supra. The Exchange thus proposes to use the
phrase ‘‘person associated with a member
organization’’ to indicate employees of a member
organization for purposes of proposed Rule 2111.
20 See Proposed Rule 2111(a). For institutional
customers, the proposed Rule would require that a
member organization or person associated with a
member organization have a reasonable basis to
believe that the institutional customer is capable of
evaluating investment risks independently, both in
general and with regard to particular transactions
and investment strategies, and is exercising
independent judgment in evaluating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
rule, the proposed Rule would explicitly
cover a recommended investment
strategy.21 The proposed Rule would
exclude the following communications
from the coverage of proposed Rule
2111 as long as they do not include
(standing alone or in combination with
other communications) a
recommendation of a particular security
or securities:
• General financial and investment
information, including (i) basic
investment concepts, such as risk and
return, diversification, dollar cost
averaging, compounded return, and tax
deferred investment, (ii) historic
differences in the return of asset classes
(e.g., equities, bonds, or cash) based on
standard market indices, (iii) effects of
inflation, (iv) estimates of future
retirement income needs, and (v)
assessment of a customer’s investment
profile;
• Descriptive information about an
employer-sponsored retirement or
benefit plan, participation in the plan,
the benefits of plan participation, and
the investment options available under
the plan;
• Asset allocation models that are (i)
based on generally accepted investment
theory, (ii) accompanied by disclosures
of all material facts and assumptions
that may affect a reasonable investor’s
assessment of the asset allocation model
or any report generated by such model,
and (iii) in compliance with FINRA
Rule 2214 (Requirements for the Use of
Investment Analysis Tools) if the asset
allocation model is an ‘‘investment
analysis tool’’ covered by FINRA Rule
2214; and
• Interactive investment materials
that incorporate the above.22
Again like its FINRA counterpart, the
proposed Rule would be composed of
three main suitability obligations, as
follows:
• The reasonable-basis suitability
obligation, which requires a member
organization or person associated with a
member organization to have a
reasonable basis to believe, based on
reasonable diligence, that the
recommendation is suitable for at least
some investors; 23
recommendations. See Proposed Rule 2111(b).
Institutional customers would also be required to
affirmatively indicate that they are exercising
independent judgment. See id.
21 FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability
Approval, 75 FR at 71481.
22 See Proposed Rule 2111.03.
23 See Proposed Rule 2111.05(a). The proposed
rule would clarify that, in general, what constitutes
reasonable diligence will vary depending on, among
other things, the complexity of and risks associated
with the security or investment strategy and the
member organization’s or person associated with a
member organization’s familiarity with the security
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• The customer-specific suitability
obligation, which requires that a
member organization or person
associated with a member organization
have a reasonable basis to believe that
the recommendation is suitable for a
particular customer based on that
customer’s investment profile, as
delineated in proposed Rule 2111(a); 24
and
• The quantitative suitability
obligation, which requires a member
organization or person associated with a
member organization who has actual or
de facto control over a customer account
to have a reasonable basis for believing
that a series of recommended
transactions, even if suitable when
viewed in isolation, are not excessive
and unsuitable for the customer when
taken together in light of the customer’s
investment profile, as delineated in
proposed Rule 2111(a).25
Proposed Rule 2111 would also
prohibit a member organization or
person associated with a member
organization from recommending a
transaction or investment strategy
involving a security or securities or the
continuing purchase of a security or
securities or use of an investment
strategy involving a security or
securities unless the member
organization or person associated with a
member organization has a reasonable
basis to believe that the customer has
the financial ability to meet such a
commitment.26
Finally, like the FINRA rule, proposed
Rule 2111 would provide an exemption
to customer-specific suitability for
institutional investors, who would be
required to affirmatively indicate that
they are exercising independent
judgment in evaluating the
recommendations of the member
organization on a trade-by-trade basis,
on an asset-class-by-asset-class basis, or
or investment strategy. Further, a member
organization’s or person associated with a member
organization’s reasonable diligence must provide
the member organization or person associated with
a member organization with an understanding of
the potential risks and rewards associated with the
recommended security or strategy. Finally, the
proposed rule would specify that the lack of such
an understanding when recommending a security or
strategy violates the suitability rule. See generally
id.
24 See Proposed Rule 2111.05(b).
25 See Proposed Rule 2111.05(c). The proposed
rule would provide that no single test defines
excessive activity but that factors such as the
turnover rate, the cost-equity ratio, and the use of
in-and-out trading in a customer’s account may
provide a basis for a finding that a member
organization or person associated with a member
organization has violated the quantitative suitability
obligation. See id.
26 See Proposed Rule 2111.06.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
in terms of all potential transactions for
its account.27
2. Statutory Basis
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,28 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,29 in particular, because the
proposed rule change would be
consistent with and facilitate a
governance and regulatory structure that
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Exchange’s obligations under
the Exchange Act to prevent fraudulent
or manipulative acts and practices, and
to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, because the proposed rule
would incorporate the FINRA ‘‘know
your customer’’ rule and related
suitability standards into the Exchange’s
Rules. The ‘‘know your customer’’ and
suitability obligations are critical to
ensuring investor protection and fair
dealing with customers.
Further, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change supports the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act
by providing greater harmonization
between Exchange rules and FINRA
rules of similar purpose, resulting in
less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. In particular,
Exchange member organizations that are
also FINRA members are subject to
NYSE MKT Rule 405 and FINRA Rules
2090 and 2111, and harmonizing these
rules by adopting proposed rules
identical to FINRA Rules 2090 and
2111would promote just and equitable
principles of trade by providing greater
harmonization between NYSE MKT
27 See Proposed Rule 2111.07. Like the FINRA
rule, the institutional-customer exemption would
apply only if both parts of the two-part test are met:
(1) There is a reasonable basis to believe that the
institutional customer is capable of evaluating
investment risks independently, in general and
with regard to particular transactions and
investment strategies, and (2) the institutional
customer affirmatively indicates that it is exercising
independent judgment in evaluating
recommendations. See Proposed Rule 2111(b);
FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability
Approval, 75 FR at 71481, n. 25.
28 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
29 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Rules and FINRA Rules of similar
purpose by requiring the same standards
for ‘‘know your customer’’ and
suitability, resulting in less burdensome
and more efficient regulatory
compliance for Dual Members. As
previously noted, the proposed rule text
is substantially the same as NYSE
MKT’s rule text. To the extent the
Exchange has proposed changes that
differ from the FINRA version of the
Exchange rules, such changes are
generally technical in nature and do not
change the substance of the proposed
rules. The Exchange also believes that
the proposed rule change will update
and add specificity to the requirements
governing ‘‘know your customer’’ and
suitability requirements, which will
promote just and equitable principles of
trade and help to protect investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,30 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The proposed rule change is not
intended to address competitive issues
but rather to achieve greater consistency
between the Exchange’s rules and
FINRA’s rules concerning ‘‘know your
customer’’ and suitability.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 31 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.32 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 33 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),34 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 35 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–59 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–59. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
30 15
33 17
31 15
34 17
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41367
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
35 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
41368
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–59 and should be
submitted on or before July 15, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.36
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–14933 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Dated: June 20, 2016.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[SEC File No. 270–116, OMB Control No.
3235–0109]
[FR Doc. 2016–14931 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–2736.
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Extensions: Rule 12d1–3.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Exchange Act Rule 12d1–3 (17 CFR
240.12d1–3) requires a certification that
a security has been approved by an
exchange for listing and registration
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78l(d)) to be filed with the
Commission. The information required
under Rule 12d1–3 must be filed with
the Commission and is publicly
available. We estimate that it takes
36 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Jun 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
approximately one-half hour to provide
the information required under Rule
12d1–3 and that the information is filed
by approximately 688 respondents
annually for a total annual reporting
burden of 344 burden hours (0.5 hours
per response × 688 responses).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
The public may view the background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site,
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549 or send an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #14746 and #14747]
Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s disaster declaration,
applications for disaster loans may be
filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: San Patricio.
Contiguous Counties: Texas: Aransas,
Bee, Jim Wells, Live Oak, Nueces,
Refugio.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations With
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
3.250
1.625
6.250
4.000
2.625
2.625
4.000
2.625
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 14746 6 and for
economic injury is 14747 0.
The State which received an EIDL
Declaration # is Texas.
Texas Disaster #TX–00471
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2016–14990 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am]
This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of Texas dated 06/16/2016.
Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
Incident Period: 05/16/2016.
Effective Date: 06/16/2016.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 08/15/2016.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 03/16/2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. MCF 21067]
Prisoner Transportation Services,
LLC—Control—U.S. Corrections, LLC
D/B/A U.S.C.
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice tentatively approving
and authorizing finance transaction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On May 26, 2016, Prisoner
Transportation Services, LLC
(Applicant) filed an application under
49 U.S.C. 14303 so that it can acquire
common control of U.S. Corrections,
LLC (U.S.C.). The Board is tentatively
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41364-41368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78106; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Adopting New NYSE MKT
Rules 2090--Equities (Know Your Customer) and 2111--Equities
(Suitability) That Are Substantially Similar to FINRA Rules 2090 (Know
Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability), Deleting Current NYSE MKT Rule
405--Equities (Diligence as to Accounts), and Making Other Conforming
Changes
June 20, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\
notice is hereby given that on June 9, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (``Exchange''
or ``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes adopting new rule text that is substantially
similar to Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability) of
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), (2)
deleting current Rule 405--Equities (Diligence as to Accounts) (``Rule
405''), and (3) making other conforming changes. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to harmonize with certain
FINRA rules. Specifically, the Exchange proposes (1) adopting new rule
text that is substantially similar to FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111; (2)
deleting Rule 405; \4\ and (3) making other conforming changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ References to rules are to NYSE MKT rules unless otherwise
indicated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
In 2007, FINRA and the Exchange's affiliate the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') \5\ entered into an
[[Page 41365]]
agreement (the ``Agreement'') pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act to
reduce regulatory duplication by allocating to FINRA certain regulatory
responsibilities for NYSE rules and rule interpretations (``FINRA
Incorporated NYSE Rules'').\6\ NYSE MKT became a party to the Agreement
effective December 15, 2008.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NYSE Regulation, Inc., a former not-for-profit subsidiary of
the NYSE, was also a party to the Agreement by virtue of the fact
that it performed regulatory functions for the NYSE pursuant to a
delegation agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382
(February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251, 11264-65 (March 6, 2006) (SR-NYSE-
2005-77) (approving delegation agreement). NYSE Regulation also
performed regulatory services for the Exchange pursuant to an
intercompany Regulatory Services Agreement (``RSA'') that gave the
Exchange the contractual right to review NYSE Regulation's
performance. The delegation agreement and related RSA terminated on
February 16, 2016, and NYSE Regulation has ceased providing
regulatory services to the Exchange, which has re-integrated its
regulatory functions.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148 (July 26,
2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement);
56147 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-
054) (order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as
``Common Rules''). Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement sets forth
procedures regarding proposed changes by FINRA or the Exchange to
the substance of any of the Common Rules.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148 (July 26,
2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement);
56147 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-
054) (order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as
``Common Rules''); 60409 (July 30, 2009), 74 FR 39353 (August 6,
2009) (order approving the amended and restated Agreement, adding
NYSE MKT LLC as a party). Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement sets forth
procedures regarding proposed changes by FINRA, NYSE or NYSE MKT to
the substance of any of the Common Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to reduce regulatory duplication and relieve firms that
are members of the Exchange, the NYSE and FINRA of conflicting or
unnecessary regulatory burdens, FINRA has been reviewing and amending
the NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules in order to create a
consolidated FINRA rulebook.\8\ As part of the rule consolidation
process, in 2010, FINRA harmonized NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE
Rules and interpretations concerning know your customer and
suitability.\9\ In its filing, FINRA (1) adopted FINRA Rules 2090 (Know
Your Customer) and 2090 (Suitability), and (2) deleted NASD Rule 2310
(Recommendations to Customers (Suitability)) and NYSE Rule 405
(Diligence as to Accounts) as well as NYSE Rule Interpretations 405/01
through/04. The rule change was effective July 9, 2012.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ FINRA's rulebook currently has three sets of rules: (1) NASD
Rules, (2) FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules, and (3) consolidated FINRA
Rules. The FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to those members
of FINRA that are also members of the NYSE (``Dual Members''), while
the consolidated FINRA Rules apply to all FINRA members. For more
information about the FINRA rulebook consolidation process, see
FINRA Information Notice, March 12, 2008.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63325 ((November 17,
2010), 75 FR 71479 (November 23, 2010) (SR-FINRA-2010-039) (``FINRA
Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval'').
\10\ See FINRA Regulatory Notice 11-25 (May 2011). The original
effective date was October 7, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the Exchange does not have separate rules for know your
customer and suitability. Rather, Rule 405, based on NYSE Rule 405,\11\
requires every member organization, through a principal executive or a
person or persons designated under the provisions of Rule 3110(a), to
take certain actions relative to customers and customer accounts.
First, Rule 405(1) requires member organizations to use ``due
diligence'' to learn the ``essential facts relative to every customer,
every order, every cash or margin account accepted or carried by such
organization and every person holding power of attorney over any
account accepted or carried by such organization.'' Second, Rule 405(2)
requires member organizations to supervise diligently all accounts
handled by registered representatives. Finally, Rule 405(3) requires
persons designated by the member to be informed of the essential facts
relative to the customer and to the nature of the proposed account
prior to approving the opening of the account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The NYSE recently made a similar filing to delete Rule 405
and its related interpretations and adopt new NYSE Rules 2090 and
2111 based on FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 77838 (May 16, 2016), 81 FR 31974 (May 20, 2016) (SR-
NYSE-2016-33).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplementary Material .10 of Rule 405 generally discusses the
requirements that firms know their customers and imposes specific
knowledge and due diligence requirements in connection with the
authority of third parties to act on behalf of customers that are legal
entities, including margin accounts carried by a member organization
for a non-member corporation, cash accounts carried for a non-member
corporation, and agency accounts carried by a member organization.\12\
Supplementary Material .20 of Rule 405 refers to the requirements of
Rule 4311 concerning the permitted allocation of responsibilities
between introducing and carrying organizations. Supplementary Material
.30 cross references to Rule 414 (Index and Currency Warrants).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ As discussed below, the Exchange believes that
Supplementary Material .10 of Rule 405--Equities is redundant of
proposed Rule 2090 and proposed Supplementary Material .01 thereof
that would require firms to know the essential facts concerning
every customer.
\13\ NYSE Rule 414 provides that Rule 723 (Suitability) applies
to recommendations in currency warrants, currency index warrants and
stock index warrants. When the Exchange adopted the NYSE's rules in
2008, however, NYSE Rule 414 was not adopted. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58265 (July 30, 2008), 73 FR 46075, 46078
(August 7, 2008) (SR-Amex-2008-63). The Exchange believes that the
other cross references in Rule 405 are either no longer necessary or
moot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete current Rule 405 as either
duplicative of, or not aligned with, the proposed know your customer
and suitability requirements discussed below, and adopt the text of
FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The technical and conforming changes are that the Exchange
would (1) substitute the term ``member organization'' for ``member''
(see note 18, infra), (2) substitute the term ``Exchange'' for
``FINRA,'' (3) change certain cross-references to FINRA rules to
cross-references to Exchange rules, and (4) add references to
proposed Rules 2090--Equities and 2111--Equities in Rule 3170 (Tape
Recording of Registered Persons by Certain Firms).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 2090--Equities (Know Your Customer)
Like FINRA Rule 2090, proposed Rule 2090--Equities (``Rule 2090'')
would encompass the ``main ethical standard'' of Rule 405(1).\15\ The
proposed rule would require every ``member organization through a
principal executive or a person or persons designated under the
provisions of Rule 3110(a)'' \16\ to use ``reasonable diligence,'' with
regard to the opening and maintenance of every account, in order to
know and retain the essential facts concerning every customer. The
proposed supplementary material would define ``essential facts'' as
those ``required to (a) effectively service the customer's account, (b)
act in accordance with any special handling instructions for the
account, (c) understand the authority of each person acting on behalf
of the customer, and (d) comply with applicable laws, regulations, and
rules.'' \17\ The proposed rule would be identical to FINRA Rule 2090
except that the proposed rule would use the term ``member
organization'' rather than ``member,'' which has different meanings
under FINRA and Exchange rules.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at
71480.
\16\ This is the current formulation in Rule 405, which the
Exchange proposes to retain.
\17\ See Proposed Rule 2090.01. Like FINRA, the Exchange does
not propose to incorporate the requirement in NYSE Rule 405(1) to
learn the essential facts relative to ``every order.'' The Exchange
agrees with FINRA that the application of existing order-handling
rules renders this formulation unnecessary. See FINRA Know Your
Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71480. Further, the
Exchange's proposed suitability rule would also require member
organizations and persons associated with a member organization to
use reasonable diligence to understand the securities and strategies
they recommend, further obviating the need for this language. See
id.
\18\ Under FINRA Rules, a ``member'' means individual,
partnership, corporation or other legal entity admitted to
membership in FINRA under Articles III and IV of the FINRA By-Laws.
See FINRA Rule 0160(b)(10). Article III, Sec. 1(a) generally limits
membership to registered brokers, dealers, municipal securities
brokers or dealers, or government securities brokers or dealers.
NYSE MKT's equivalent term is ``member organization.'' See Rule
2(b)(i)--Equities (defining ``member organization'' as a registered
broker or dealer (unless exempt pursuant to the Act) that is a
member of FINRA or another registered securities exchange). Under
Rule 2(a)--Equities, the term ``member'' means a natural person
associated with a member organization who has been approved by the
Exchange and designated by such member organization to effect
transactions on the floor of the Exchange or any facility thereof. A
``member'' is not a registered broker-dealer and does not have
employees; only member organizations have employees. For purposes of
the proposed amendments to its disciplinary rules, the Exchange
proposes to continue using the phrase ``covered person'' to indicate
employees of a member organization. As noted below, for purposes of
the proposed change, the Exchange proposes to continue using the
phrase ``person associated with a member organization'' to indicate
employees of a member organization for purposes of proposed Rule
2111.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 41366]]
Proposed Rule 2111--Equities (Suitability)
Proposed Rule 2111--Equities (``Rule 2111''), like its FINRA
counterpart, would require a member organization or person associated
with a member organization \19\ to have a ``reasonable basis'' to
believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving
a security or securities is suitable for the customer. This assessment
would be based on the information obtained through the reasonable
diligence of the member organization or person associated with a member
organization to ascertain the customer's investment profile, which
includes, but is not limited to, the customer's age, other investments,
financial situation and needs, tax status, investment objectives,
investment experience, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, risk
tolerance, and any other information the customer may disclose to the
member organization or person associated with a member organization in
connection with such recommendation.\20\ Like the FINRA rule, the
proposed Rule would explicitly cover a recommended investment
strategy.\21\ The proposed Rule would exclude the following
communications from the coverage of proposed Rule 2111 as long as they
do not include (standing alone or in combination with other
communications) a recommendation of a particular security or
securities:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ As proposed, Rule 2111 is identical to FINRA Rule 2111
except that the Exchange proposes to use the phrase ``member
organization or person associated with a member organization''
rather than ``member or an associated person'' to indicate the
coverage of the rule. As discussed above, ``member'' and ``member
organization'' have different meanings under NYSE MKT and FINRA
rules, and under the Exchange's rules only member organizations can
have employees. See note 16, supra. The Exchange thus proposes to
use the phrase ``person associated with a member organization'' to
indicate employees of a member organization for purposes of proposed
Rule 2111.
\20\ See Proposed Rule 2111(a). For institutional customers, the
proposed Rule would require that a member organization or person
associated with a member organization have a reasonable basis to
believe that the institutional customer is capable of evaluating
investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to
particular transactions and investment strategies, and is exercising
independent judgment in evaluating recommendations. See Proposed
Rule 2111(b). Institutional customers would also be required to
affirmatively indicate that they are exercising independent
judgment. See id.
\21\ FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at
71481.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General financial and investment information, including
(i) basic investment concepts, such as risk and return,
diversification, dollar cost averaging, compounded return, and tax
deferred investment, (ii) historic differences in the return of asset
classes (e.g., equities, bonds, or cash) based on standard market
indices, (iii) effects of inflation, (iv) estimates of future
retirement income needs, and (v) assessment of a customer's investment
profile;
Descriptive information about an employer-sponsored
retirement or benefit plan, participation in the plan, the benefits of
plan participation, and the investment options available under the
plan;
Asset allocation models that are (i) based on generally
accepted investment theory, (ii) accompanied by disclosures of all
material facts and assumptions that may affect a reasonable investor's
assessment of the asset allocation model or any report generated by
such model, and (iii) in compliance with FINRA Rule 2214 (Requirements
for the Use of Investment Analysis Tools) if the asset allocation model
is an ``investment analysis tool'' covered by FINRA Rule 2214; and
Interactive investment materials that incorporate the
above.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Proposed Rule 2111.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again like its FINRA counterpart, the proposed Rule would be
composed of three main suitability obligations, as follows:
The reasonable-basis suitability obligation, which
requires a member organization or person associated with a member
organization to have a reasonable basis to believe, based on reasonable
diligence, that the recommendation is suitable for at least some
investors; \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(a). The proposed rule would
clarify that, in general, what constitutes reasonable diligence will
vary depending on, among other things, the complexity of and risks
associated with the security or investment strategy and the member
organization's or person associated with a member organization's
familiarity with the security or investment strategy. Further, a
member organization's or person associated with a member
organization's reasonable diligence must provide the member
organization or person associated with a member organization with an
understanding of the potential risks and rewards associated with the
recommended security or strategy. Finally, the proposed rule would
specify that the lack of such an understanding when recommending a
security or strategy violates the suitability rule. See generally
id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The customer-specific suitability obligation, which
requires that a member organization or person associated with a member
organization have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation
is suitable for a particular customer based on that customer's
investment profile, as delineated in proposed Rule 2111(a); \24\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The quantitative suitability obligation, which requires a
member organization or person associated with a member organization who
has actual or de facto control over a customer account to have a
reasonable basis for believing that a series of recommended
transactions, even if suitable when viewed in isolation, are not
excessive and unsuitable for the customer when taken together in light
of the customer's investment profile, as delineated in proposed Rule
2111(a).\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(c). The proposed rule would
provide that no single test defines excessive activity but that
factors such as the turnover rate, the cost-equity ratio, and the
use of in-and-out trading in a customer's account may provide a
basis for a finding that a member organization or person associated
with a member organization has violated the quantitative suitability
obligation. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 2111 would also prohibit a member organization or
person associated with a member organization from recommending a
transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities
or the continuing purchase of a security or securities or use of an
investment strategy involving a security or securities unless the
member organization or person associated with a member organization has
a reasonable basis to believe that the customer has the financial
ability to meet such a commitment.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Proposed Rule 2111.06.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, like the FINRA rule, proposed Rule 2111 would provide an
exemption to customer-specific suitability for institutional investors,
who would be required to affirmatively indicate that they are
exercising independent judgment in evaluating the recommendations of
the member organization on a trade-by-trade basis, on an asset-class-
by-asset-class basis, or
[[Page 41367]]
in terms of all potential transactions for its account.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Proposed Rule 2111.07. Like the FINRA rule, the
institutional-customer exemption would apply only if both parts of
the two-part test are met: (1) There is a reasonable basis to
believe that the institutional customer is capable of evaluating
investment risks independently, in general and with regard to
particular transactions and investment strategies, and (2) the
institutional customer affirmatively indicates that it is exercising
independent judgment in evaluating recommendations. See Proposed
Rule 2111(b); FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75
FR at 71481, n. 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\28\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\29\ in particular, because
the proposed rule change would be consistent with and facilitate a
governance and regulatory structure that is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange's obligations
under the Exchange Act to prevent fraudulent or manipulative acts and
practices, and to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
because the proposed rule would incorporate the FINRA ``know your
customer'' rule and related suitability standards into the Exchange's
Rules. The ``know your customer'' and suitability obligations are
critical to ensuring investor protection and fair dealing with
customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
supports the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act by providing
greater harmonization between Exchange rules and FINRA rules of similar
purpose, resulting in less burdensome and more efficient regulatory
compliance. In particular, Exchange member organizations that are also
FINRA members are subject to NYSE MKT Rule 405 and FINRA Rules 2090 and
2111, and harmonizing these rules by adopting proposed rules identical
to FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111would promote just and equitable principles
of trade by providing greater harmonization between NYSE MKT Rules and
FINRA Rules of similar purpose by requiring the same standards for
``know your customer'' and suitability, resulting in less burdensome
and more efficient regulatory compliance for Dual Members. As
previously noted, the proposed rule text is substantially the same as
NYSE MKT's rule text. To the extent the Exchange has proposed changes
that differ from the FINRA version of the Exchange rules, such changes
are generally technical in nature and do not change the substance of
the proposed rules. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule
change will update and add specificity to the requirements governing
``know your customer'' and suitability requirements, which will promote
just and equitable principles of trade and help to protect investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\30\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather to achieve greater consistency
between the Exchange's rules and FINRA's rules concerning ``know your
customer'' and suitability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \31\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\32\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \33\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\34\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \35\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
[[Page 41368]]
proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59 and should
be submitted on or before July 15, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-14933 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P