Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2015, 40850-40851 [2016-14913]

Download as PDF 40850 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Notices Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment. ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Notice of Petitions by Firms for Determination of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of these firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm’s workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE [6/11/2016 through 6/17/2016] Firm name Marlen Textiles, Inc ................. Firm address 500 Orchard Street, New Haven, MO 63068–1108. Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: June 17, 2016. Miriam Kearse, Lead Program Analyst. [FR Doc. 2016–14855 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–88–2016] asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone 18—San Jose, California; Application for Subzone Expansion; Subzone 18G; Tesla Motors, Inc.; Palo Alto and Fremont, California An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the City of San Jose, California, grantee of FTZ 18, requesting to expand Subzone 18G on behalf of Tesla Motors, Inc., located in Palo Alto and Fremont, California. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 Date accepted for investigation 6/16/2016 Product(s) The firm is a manufacturer of economy fabrics used to make boat covers, tarps, furniture covers, awnings, tents and other products. amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on June 15, 2016. Subzone 18G was approved on September 20, 2012 (77 FR 60672– 60673, October 4, 2012) and currently consists of two sites: Site 1 (25.2 acres)—3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto; and, Site 2 (210 acres)—45550 Fremont Boulevard, Fremont. The applicant is now requesting authority to expand the subzone to include an additional 24.5 acres located adjacent to Site 2. No additional production authority is being requested at this time. The expanded subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 18. In accordance with the FTZ Board’s regulations, Christopher Kemp of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is August 2, 2016. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to August 17, 2016. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at christopher.kemp@ trade.gov or (202) 482–0862. Dated: June 15, 2016. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–14809 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–843] Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on prestressed concrete steel rail tie wire (PC tie wire) from Mexico.1 The period of review (POR) is December 12, 2013, through May 31, 2015. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Aceros Camesa, S.A. de C.V. (Camesa). We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After considering the comments received, we made no changes to our preliminary margin calculations, and we AGENCY: 1 See Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire From Mexico: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 2105, 81 FR 12466 (March 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results). E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Notices continue to find that Camesa made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at prices below normal value. Camesa’s final dumping margin is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Aqmar Rahman, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4007 and (202) 482–0768, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background For a complete description of the events following the publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The product covered by this order is prestressed concrete steel rail tie wire. This product is classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 7217.10.8045, but may also be classified under subheadings 7217.10.7000, 7217.10.8025, 7217.10.8030, 7217.10.8090, 7217.10.9000, 7229.90.1000, 7229.90.5016, 7229.90.5031, 7229.90.5051, 2 See memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire from Mexico; 2013–2015,’’ dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 7229.90.9000, and 7312.10.3012. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.3 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department determines that a weightedaverage dumping margin of 6.33 percent exists for Camesa for the period December 12, 2013, through May 31, 2015. Assessment Rates The Department determines, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.4 We calculated an importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if the importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Camesa will be the rate established in these final results; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but 3 A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 4 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40851 the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 9.99 percent, the all-others rate made effective by the LTFV investigation. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This administrative review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221. Dated: June 15, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Margin Calculations IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Issues A. Clerical Error in the Draft Liquidation Instructions B. Camesa’s General and Administrative (G&A) Expense Offset VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016–14913 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40850-40851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-843]


Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire From Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on prestressed concrete steel rail tie wire 
(PC tie wire) from Mexico.\1\ The period of review (POR) is December 
12, 2013, through May 31, 2015. The review covers one producer/exporter 
of the subject merchandise, Aceros Camesa, S.A. de C.V. (Camesa). We 
gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. After considering the comments received, we made no changes to 
our preliminary margin calculations, and we

[[Page 40851]]

continue to find that Camesa made sales of subject merchandise to the 
United States at prices below normal value. Camesa's final dumping 
margin is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the 
Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie Wire From Mexico: 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2013-2105, 81 FR 12466 (March 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Aqmar Rahman, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007 
and (202) 482-0768, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    For a complete description of the events following the publication 
of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ 
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's AD and Countervailing 
Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is 
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the 
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Prestressed Concrete Steel 
Rail Tie Wire from Mexico; 2013-2015,'' dated concurrently with and 
adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance 
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this order is prestressed concrete steel 
rail tie wire. This product is classified under the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 7217.10.8045, but may 
also be classified under subheadings 7217.10.7000, 7217.10.8025, 
7217.10.8030, 7217.10.8090, 7217.10.9000, 7229.90.1000, 7229.90.5016, 
7229.90.5031, 7229.90.5051, 7229.90.9000, and 7312.10.3012. Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties 
raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 
attached to this notice as Appendix I.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, the Department determines that a 
weighted-average dumping margin of 6.33 percent exists for Camesa for 
the period December 12, 2013, through May 31, 2015.

Assessment Rates

    The Department determines, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review.\4\ We calculated an importer-specific ad 
valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of 
antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total 
entered value of the examined sales to that importer. We will instruct 
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by 
this review if the importer-specific assessment rate is above de 
minimis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Camesa will be 
the rate established in these final results; (2) for previously 
reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 
covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate 
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 9.99 
percent, the all-others rate made effective by the LTFV investigation. 
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and notice are published in accordance 
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: June 15, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
    A. Clerical Error in the Draft Liquidation Instructions
    B. Camesa's General and Administrative (G&A) Expense Offset
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-14913 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P