Certain Pasta From Italy: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews, 40659-40661 [2016-14672]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2016 / Notices
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until June 15, 2025.
Issued this 15 day of June 2016.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–14745 Filed 6–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–818; C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is self-initiating a
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping (AD) and countervailing
(CVD) orders on certain pasta from
Italy 1 (1) in furtherance of the purpose
of the International Trade Data System
(ITDS) initiative and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection’s (CBP) efforts to
modernize the electronic submission of
import documents using the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE), and (2)
to align across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders the scope language regarding
certifications accompanying imports of
organic pasta. Specifically, in
conjunction with this initiation, the
Department preliminarily determines to
convert the certification submission
requirement to a record-keeping
requirement, to authorize electronic
submission of the certification, to
update the scope language relating to
the organic pasta exclusion, and to align
the certification language across the AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 22, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Meek, Office I for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482–2778; George
McMahon, Office III for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482–1167; or Sam
Zengotitabengoa, Customs Liaison Unit
for AD/CVD Operations, at (202) 482–
4195, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta From Italy, 61 FR
38547 (July 24, 1996); and Notice of Countervailing
Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta
(‘‘Pasta’’) From Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996)
(collectively, AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
& Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The ITDS is an electronic trade data
interchange system authorized pursuant
to section 405 of the Security and
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port
Act of 2006, Public Law 109–347. The
purpose of ITDS, as defined by Section
405 of the SAFE Port Act of 2006, ‘‘is
to eliminate redundant information
requirements, to efficiently regulate the
flow of commerce, and to effectively
enforce laws and regulations relating to
international trade, by establishing a
single portal system, operated by the
United States Customs and Border
Protection, for the collection and
distribution of standard electronic
import and export data required by all
participating Federal agencies.’’ On
October 13, 2015, CBP issued an interim
final rule to amend its regulations to
provide that, as of November 1, 2015,
ACE is a CBP-authorized Electronic Data
Interchange System which may be used
for the filing of entries and entry
summaries.2
Scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders
On July 24, 1996, the Department
published the notice of the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders in the Federal
Register with nearly identical language
regarding the scope of the orders.3 In
particular, the scope language covered:
Certain non-egg dry pasta in packages of
five pounds (or 2.27 kilograms) or less,
whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional ingredients
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable
purees, milk, gluten, diastases, vitamins,
coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by this
scope is typically sold in the retail market,
in fiberboard or cardboard cartons or
polyethylene or polypropylene bags, of
varying dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this order are
refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as well
as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception
of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two
percent egg white. Also excluded are imports
of organic pasta from Italy that are
accompanied by the appropriate certificate
issued by the Associazione Marchigiana
2 See Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)
Filings for Electronic Entry/Entry Summary (Cargo
Release and Related Entry), 80 FR 61278 (October
13, 2015) (Interim Final Rule); and Notice
Announcing the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) as the Sole CBP-Authorized
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) System for
Processing Certain Electronic Entry and Entry
Summary Filings, 81 FR 10264 (February 29, 2016)
(General Notice).
3 See AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40659
Agricultura Biologica (AMAB) or by
Bioagricoop scrl.
On July 9, 1996, after the date of our final
antidumping duty determination, Euro-USA
Trading Co., Inc., of Pawcatuck, CT,
submitted materials to the Department
supporting its request for an exclusion for
pasta certified to be ‘‘organic pasta.’’ Among
the documents submitted are a decree from
the Italian Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry authorizing Bioagricoop scrl to
certify foodstuffs as organic for the
implementation of EEC Regulation 2029/91.
Also submitted is a letter (with an
accompanying translation into English) from
the Director of Controls of Processing and
Marketing Firms at Bioagricoop stating that
the organization will take responsibility for
its organic pasta certificates and will supply
the necessary documentation to U.S.
authorities. On this basis, imports of organic
pasta from Italy that are accompanied by the
appropriate certificate issued by Bioagricoop
scrl are excluded from the scope of this
order.4
The merchandise under order is currently
classifiable under items 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
As noted in the language comprising
the scope of the orders, our written
description of the scope of the orders is
dispositive. However, the notices
published in connection with
subsequent administrative reviews of
the orders have contained minor
differences in language regarding the
identification of the authority that
issues the organic certifications.
Specifically, the most recent published
final results in the CVD proceeding 5
states, with regard to this exclusion and
certification for organic pasta, ‘‘{a}lso
excluded are imports of organic pasta
from Italy that are accompanied by the
appropriate certificate issued by the
Instituto Mediterraneo Di Certificzione,
by QC&I International Services, by
Ecocert Italia, by Consorzio per il
Controllo dei Prodotti Biologici, by
Associazion Italiana per l’Agricoltra
Biologica, or by Ambientale.’’ By
comparison, the most recent published
final results in the AD proceeding 6
4 Note that a modified version of this paragraph
has appeared in the scope description in all
subsequent administrative reviews, which has no
material impact on the scope’s coverage.
5 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012,
80 FR 11172 (March 2, 2015), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at ‘‘Scope of the
Order.’’
6 Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
‘‘Scope of the Order.’’
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
40660
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
states, ‘‘{a}lso excluded are imports of
organic pasta from Italy that are certified
by a European Union (EU) authorized
body and accompanied by a National
Organic Program import certificate for
organic products.’’
In connection with the organic
exclusion language, both the 2010 and
2010–2011 administrative reviews of the
CVD and AD orders on pasta from Italy
cite the same October 10, 2012,
memorandum (‘‘Recognition of EU
Organic Certifying Agents for Certifying
Organic Pasta from Italy’’). The
Department has placed a copy of that
memorandum on the records of these
changed circumstances reviews. In that
memorandum, at page 2, the
Department stated, ‘‘. . . we intend to
update the scope language to clarify that
organic pasta from Italy is excluded
from the scope when accompanied by
the appropriate NOP certificate issued
by any EU control body or control
authorities identified by the USDA as
part of the U.S.-EU Partnership on
Organic Trade . . .’’ The Department
stated that the scope language for both
orders would read: ‘‘Also excluded are
imports of organic pasta from Italy that
are certified by an EU authorized body
and accompanied by a National Organic
Program import certificate for organic
products.’’
Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Review
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department
will conduct a changed circumstances
review of an antidumping or
countervailing duty order when it
receives information which shows
changed circumstances sufficient to
warrant such a review. In this case, the
Department has determined that the
advent of ITDS constitutes sufficient
circumstances to conduct a changed
circumstances review of the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders. Further, the
Department does not require any
additional information to make a
preliminary finding. For this reason, as
permitted by 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii),
the Department finds that expedited
action is warranted and is conducting
this review on an expedited basis by
publishing preliminary results in
conjunction with this notice of
initiation.
Currently the scope of the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders requires that in order
for a specific entry to be exempted from
the AD and CVD orders based on the
exclusion of organic pasta, the
certifications must accompany the
entry. Consistent with the ITDS
initiative, which aims to streamline the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
information filed with the U.S.
Government via ACE as part of the
import and export process, the
Department evaluated whether the
organic certification submission
requirement related to the AD/CVD Italy
Pasta Orders may be simplified. Based
on our evaluation, we have
preliminarily determined that it is
appropriate to convert the certification
requirement from an Entry Summary
submission requirement to a recordkeeping requirement for the exporter
and the importer, consistent with the
Department of Agriculture’s National
Organic Program, and the ITDS’ goal to
streamline the import process.7
Under such a record-keeping
requirement, both the exporter and the
importer would be required to maintain
a copy of the original certification in
their respective records, as well as
documentation supporting the
certification, that would be subject to
verification by the U.S. Government.
Because this certification requirement
would be a record-keeping requirement,
the exporter and importer would be
required to submit the certification in
response to a request from CBP or the
Department, in the form or manner
required by the requesting agency.
Additionally, the certification should be
issued, signed and dated prior to the
merchandise being exported from Italy.
Entries for which an exporter or
importer is unable to produce the
required certification upon the request
of CBP or the Department may be
subject to antidumping or
countervailing duties.
Additionally, the Department
preliminarily proposes to update the
exclusion language for organic pasta.
Specifically, the Department proposes to
remove the reference to the National
Organic Program certificate because the
documentation may change over time.
Finally, the Department preliminarily
determines to align the scope language
of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to
reflect the Department’s intent that the
same certification authority (or
authorities) is acceptable for purposes of
both orders and to reflect the change
from an entry submission to a recordkeeping requirement.
Based on the foregoing, we propose
altering the organic pasta exclusion and
7 See the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990
(7 U.S.C., Chapter 94): § 6519. ‘‘Recordkeeping,
investigations, and enforcement. (a) Recordkeeping.
(1) In general, Except as otherwise provided in this
chapter, each person who sells, labels, or represents
any agricultural product as having been produced
or handled using organic methods shall make
available to the Secretary or the applicable
governing State official, on request by the Secretary
or official, all records associated with the
agricultural product.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
certification language in the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders to read as follows:
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta
from Italy that are certified by an EU
authorized body in accordance with the
United State Department of Agriculture’s
National Organic Program for organic
products. The organic pasta certification
must be retained by exporters and importers
and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of
Commerce upon request.
The Department’s proposed language
is not intended to change any
requirements under, or aspects of, the
National Organic Program. If these
preliminary results are upheld in the
final results, the Department will revise
the scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders to reflect the aforementioned
scope language.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs in response to these preliminary
results by no later than 14 calendar days
after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.8
Rebuttals, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed by no later than
five calendar days after the deadline for
case briefs. Parties that submit written
comments or rebuttals are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.9 Parties who wish to
comment on the preliminary results
must file briefs electronically using
ACCESS.10 ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the day on which it is
due.11
Any interested party may submit a
request for a hearing to the Assistant
Secretary of Enforcement and
Compliance using ACCESS within 14
days of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. Hearing requests
should contain the following
information: (1) The party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
the issues to be discussed.12 Oral
8 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
when the Department is closed. See 19 CFR
351.303(b).This applies to submission of rebuttal
comments as well as any request for a hearing.
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) & (d)(2).
10 See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (f).
11 See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
12 See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2016 / Notices
presentations will be limited to issues
raised in the briefs. If a request for a
hearing is made, parties will be notified
of the time and date for the hearing to
be held at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.13
Final Results of the Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(e), the Department intends to
issue the final results of this changed
circumstances review not later than 270
days after the date on which the review
is initiated, or within 45 days if all
parties agree to our preliminary finding.
Notification to Parties
This initiation and preliminary results
of review notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216
and 351.221(c)(3)(ii).
Dated: June 14, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the AD and CVD Orders on Certain
Pasta From Italy 1
Imports covered by this Order are
shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta in
packages of five pounds four ounces or less,
whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional ingredients
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable
purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins,
coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the
scope of the Order is typically sold in the
retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene
bags of varying dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are
refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as well
as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception
of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two
percent egg white. Multicolored pasta,
imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or
paraffin and bound with raffia, is excluded
from the scope of the Order. Note 1. Pursuant
to the Department’s August 14, 2009,
changed circumstances review, effective July
1, 2008, gluten free pasta is also excluded
from the scope of the Order.2 Note 2.
Pursuant to the Department’s May 12, 2011,
changed circumstances review, effective
January 1, 2009, gluten free pasta is also
excluded from the scope of the Order.3 Note
3. Effective January 1, 2012, ravioli and
tortellini filled with cheese and/or vegetables
13 See
19 CFR 351.310(d).
scope language will be used in the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on
pasta from Italy.
2 This sentence is applicable only to the AD Italy
Pasta Order.
3 This sentence is applicable only to the CVD Italy
Pasta Order.
1 This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
are also excluded from the scope of the
Order. Note 4.
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta
from Italy that are certified by an EU
authorized body in accordance with the
United State Department of Agriculture’s
National Organic Program for organic
products. The organic pasta certification
must be retained by exporters and importers
and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of
Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is
currently classifiable under items
1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and Customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise subject to the
Order is dispositive.
Note 1: See Memorandum to Richard
Moreland, dated August 25, 1997, which is
on file in the CRU.
Note 2: See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice
of Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review and
Revocation, in Part, 74 FR 41120 (August 14,
2009).
Note 3: See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Revocation, In
Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
Note 4: See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews and Revocation, in Part, 79 FR
58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014).
[FR Doc. 2016–14672 Filed 6–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–050]
Ammonium Sulfate From the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective June 14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Galantucci at (202) 482–2923, or
William Horn at (202) 482–2615, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petition
On May 25, 2016, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) received a
countervailing duty (CVD) petition
concerning imports of ammonium
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40661
sulfate from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC), filed in proper form on
behalf of PCI Nitrogen, LLC (Petitioner).
The CVD petition was accompanied by
an antidumping duty (AD) petition, also
concerning imports of ammonium
sulfate from the PRC.1 Petitioner is a
domestic producer of ammonium
sulfate.2
On May 31, 2016 and June 7, 2016 the
Department requested information and
clarification for certain areas of the CVD
Petition.3 Petitioner filed responses to
these requests on June 3, 2016 and June
9, 2016, respectively.4
In accordance with section 702(b)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Petitioner alleges that the
Government of the PRC (GOC) is
providing countervailable subsidies
(within the meaning of sections 701 and
771(5) of the Act) with respect to
imports of ammonium sulfate from the
PRC, and that imports of ammonium
sulfate from the PRC are materially
injuring, and threaten material injury to,
the domestic industry producing
ammonium sulfate in the United States.
Also, consistent with section 702(b)(1)
of the Act, for those alleged programs on
which we have initiated a CVD
investigation, the Petition is
accompanied by information reasonably
available to Petitioner supporting its
allegations.
The Department finds that Petitioner
filed the Petition on behalf of the
domestic industry because it is an
interested party as defined in section
771(9)(C) of the Act, and that Petitioner
has demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the initiation of
the investigation Petitioner is
requesting.5
1 See ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duties: Ammonium Sulfate
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated May
25, 2016 (Petitions).
2 See Volume I of the Petitions, at 1, and Exhibit
I–1.
3 See Letter from Robert Bolling to Petitioner,
‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Ammonium Sulfate from the
People’s Republic of China: Supplemental
Questions,’’ dated May 31, 2016; see also Letter
from Robert Bolling to Petitioner, ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of
Ammonium Sulfate from the People’s Republic of
China: Supplemental Questions,’’ dated June 7,
2016.
4 See Letter from Petitioner to Secretary of
Commerce, ‘‘Ammonium Sulfate from the People’s
Republic of China/Petitioner’s Response to the
Department’s Questions Regarding the Petition,’’
dated June 3, 2016 (CVD Supplement); see also
Letter from Petitioner to Secretary of Commerce,
‘‘Ammonium Sulfate from the People’s Republic of
China/Petitioner’s Response to the Department’s
Questions Regarding the Petition,’’ dated June 9,
2016 (CVD Second Supplement).
5 See ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition’’ below.
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40659-40661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14672]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-818; C-475-819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is self-initiating
a changed circumstances review of the antidumping (AD) and
countervailing (CVD) orders on certain pasta from Italy \1\ (1) in
furtherance of the purpose of the International Trade Data System
(ITDS) initiative and U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP)
efforts to modernize the electronic submission of import documents
using the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), and (2) to align
across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders the scope language regarding
certifications accompanying imports of organic pasta. Specifically, in
conjunction with this initiation, the Department preliminarily
determines to convert the certification submission requirement to a
record-keeping requirement, to authorize electronic submission of the
certification, to update the scope language relating to the organic
pasta exclusion, and to align the certification language across the AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders. Interested parties are invited to comment on
these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta From
Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996); and Notice of Countervailing
Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination: Certain Pasta (``Pasta'') From Italy, 61 FR 38544
(July 24, 1996) (collectively, AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 22, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Meek, Office I for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482-2778; George McMahon, Office III for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482-1167; or Sam Zengotitabengoa, Customs Liaison
Unit for AD/CVD Operations, at (202) 482-4195, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The ITDS is an electronic trade data interchange system authorized
pursuant to section 405 of the Security and Accountability for Every
(SAFE) Port Act of 2006, Public Law 109-347. The purpose of ITDS, as
defined by Section 405 of the SAFE Port Act of 2006, ``is to eliminate
redundant information requirements, to efficiently regulate the flow of
commerce, and to effectively enforce laws and regulations relating to
international trade, by establishing a single portal system, operated
by the United States Customs and Border Protection, for the collection
and distribution of standard electronic import and export data required
by all participating Federal agencies.'' On October 13, 2015, CBP
issued an interim final rule to amend its regulations to provide that,
as of November 1, 2015, ACE is a CBP-authorized Electronic Data
Interchange System which may be used for the filing of entries and
entry summaries.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Filings for
Electronic Entry/Entry Summary (Cargo Release and Related Entry), 80
FR 61278 (October 13, 2015) (Interim Final Rule); and Notice
Announcing the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) as the Sole
CBP-Authorized Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) System for
Processing Certain Electronic Entry and Entry Summary Filings, 81 FR
10264 (February 29, 2016) (General Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders
On July 24, 1996, the Department published the notice of the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders in the Federal Register with nearly identical
language regarding the scope of the orders.\3\ In particular, the scope
language covered:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders.
Certain non-egg dry pasta in packages of five pounds (or 2.27
kilograms) or less, whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional ingredients such as chopped
vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastases, vitamins,
coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The pasta
covered by this scope is typically sold in the retail market, in
fiberboard or cardboard cartons or polyethylene or polypropylene
bags, of varying dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this order are refrigerated, frozen,
or canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the
exception of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg
white. Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that
are accompanied by the appropriate certificate issued by the
Associazione Marchigiana Agricultura Biologica (AMAB) or by
Bioagricoop scrl.
On July 9, 1996, after the date of our final antidumping duty
determination, Euro-USA Trading Co., Inc., of Pawcatuck, CT,
submitted materials to the Department supporting its request for an
exclusion for pasta certified to be ``organic pasta.'' Among the
documents submitted are a decree from the Italian Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry authorizing Bioagricoop scrl to certify
foodstuffs as organic for the implementation of EEC Regulation 2029/
91. Also submitted is a letter (with an accompanying translation
into English) from the Director of Controls of Processing and
Marketing Firms at Bioagricoop stating that the organization will
take responsibility for its organic pasta certificates and will
supply the necessary documentation to U.S. authorities. On this
basis, imports of organic pasta from Italy that are accompanied by
the appropriate certificate issued by Bioagricoop scrl are excluded
from the scope of this order.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Note that a modified version of this paragraph has appeared
in the scope description in all subsequent administrative reviews,
which has no material impact on the scope's coverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise under order is currently classifiable under
items 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
As noted in the language comprising the scope of the orders, our
written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. However,
the notices published in connection with subsequent administrative
reviews of the orders have contained minor differences in language
regarding the identification of the authority that issues the organic
certifications. Specifically, the most recent published final results
in the CVD proceeding \5\ states, with regard to this exclusion and
certification for organic pasta, ``{a{time} lso excluded are imports of
organic pasta from Italy that are accompanied by the appropriate
certificate issued by the Instituto Mediterraneo Di Certificzione, by
QC&I International Services, by Ecocert Italia, by Consorzio per il
Controllo dei Prodotti Biologici, by Associazion Italiana per
l'Agricoltra Biologica, or by Ambientale.'' By comparison, the most
recent published final results in the AD proceeding \6\
[[Page 40660]]
states, ``{a{time} lso excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy
that are certified by a European Union (EU) authorized body and
accompanied by a National Organic Program import certificate for
organic products.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 80 FR 11172 (March
2, 2015), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at ``Scope
of the Order.''
\6\ Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015),
and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at ``Scope of the
Order.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the organic exclusion language, both the 2010
and 2010-2011 administrative reviews of the CVD and AD orders on pasta
from Italy cite the same October 10, 2012, memorandum (``Recognition of
EU Organic Certifying Agents for Certifying Organic Pasta from
Italy''). The Department has placed a copy of that memorandum on the
records of these changed circumstances reviews. In that memorandum, at
page 2, the Department stated, ``. . . we intend to update the scope
language to clarify that organic pasta from Italy is excluded from the
scope when accompanied by the appropriate NOP certificate issued by any
EU control body or control authorities identified by the USDA as part
of the U.S.-EU Partnership on Organic Trade . . .'' The Department
stated that the scope language for both orders would read: ``Also
excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are certified by
an EU authorized body and accompanied by a National Organic Program
import certificate for organic products.''
Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department will conduct a changed
circumstances review of an antidumping or countervailing duty order
when it receives information which shows changed circumstances
sufficient to warrant such a review. In this case, the Department has
determined that the advent of ITDS constitutes sufficient circumstances
to conduct a changed circumstances review of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders. Further, the Department does not require any additional
information to make a preliminary finding. For this reason, as
permitted by 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), the Department finds that
expedited action is warranted and is conducting this review on an
expedited basis by publishing preliminary results in conjunction with
this notice of initiation.
Currently the scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders requires that
in order for a specific entry to be exempted from the AD and CVD orders
based on the exclusion of organic pasta, the certifications must
accompany the entry. Consistent with the ITDS initiative, which aims to
streamline the information filed with the U.S. Government via ACE as
part of the import and export process, the Department evaluated whether
the organic certification submission requirement related to the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders may be simplified. Based on our evaluation, we have
preliminarily determined that it is appropriate to convert the
certification requirement from an Entry Summary submission requirement
to a record-keeping requirement for the exporter and the importer,
consistent with the Department of Agriculture's National Organic
Program, and the ITDS' goal to streamline the import process.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C.,
Chapter 94): Sec. 6519. ``Recordkeeping, investigations, and
enforcement. (a) Recordkeeping. (1) In general, Except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, each person who sells, labels, or
represents any agricultural product as having been produced or
handled using organic methods shall make available to the Secretary
or the applicable governing State official, on request by the
Secretary or official, all records associated with the agricultural
product.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under such a record-keeping requirement, both the exporter and the
importer would be required to maintain a copy of the original
certification in their respective records, as well as documentation
supporting the certification, that would be subject to verification by
the U.S. Government. Because this certification requirement would be a
record-keeping requirement, the exporter and importer would be required
to submit the certification in response to a request from CBP or the
Department, in the form or manner required by the requesting agency.
Additionally, the certification should be issued, signed and dated
prior to the merchandise being exported from Italy. Entries for which
an exporter or importer is unable to produce the required certification
upon the request of CBP or the Department may be subject to antidumping
or countervailing duties.
Additionally, the Department preliminarily proposes to update the
exclusion language for organic pasta. Specifically, the Department
proposes to remove the reference to the National Organic Program
certificate because the documentation may change over time. Finally,
the Department preliminarily determines to align the scope language of
the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to reflect the Department's intent that
the same certification authority (or authorities) is acceptable for
purposes of both orders and to reflect the change from an entry
submission to a record-keeping requirement.
Based on the foregoing, we propose altering the organic pasta
exclusion and certification language in the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders
to read as follows:
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are
certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United
State Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program for
organic products. The organic pasta certification must be retained
by exporters and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of Commerce upon request.
The Department's proposed language is not intended to change any
requirements under, or aspects of, the National Organic Program. If
these preliminary results are upheld in the final results, the
Department will revise the scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to
reflect the aforementioned scope language.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs in response to these
preliminary results by no later than 14 calendar days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\8\ Rebuttals,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed by no later
than five calendar days after the deadline for case briefs. Parties
that submit written comments or rebuttals are encouraged to submit with
each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Parties who wish to
comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically
using ACCESS.\10\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room
B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. An electronically
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the day on which it is due.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is
closed. See 19 CFR 351.303(b).This applies to submission of rebuttal
comments as well as any request for a hearing.
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) & (d)(2).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (f).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may submit a request for a hearing to the
Assistant Secretary of Enforcement and Compliance using ACCESS within
14 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Hearing
requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed.\12\ Oral
[[Page 40661]]
presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and
date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the Department intends to
issue the final results of this changed circumstances review not later
than 270 days after the date on which the review is initiated, or
within 45 days if all parties agree to our preliminary finding.
Notification to Parties
This initiation and preliminary results of review notice is
published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3)(ii).
Dated: June 14, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the AD and CVD Orders on Certain Pasta From Italy \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This scope language will be used in the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on pasta from Italy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports covered by this Order are shipments of certain non-egg
dry pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or
not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional
ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk,
gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the scope of the Order is
typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are refrigerated, frozen,
or canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the
exception of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg
white. Multicolored pasta, imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or paraffin and bound
with raffia, is excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 1.
Pursuant to the Department's August 14, 2009, changed circumstances
review, effective July 1, 2008, gluten free pasta is also excluded
from the scope of the Order.\2\ Note 2. Pursuant to the Department's
May 12, 2011, changed circumstances review, effective January 1,
2009, gluten free pasta is also excluded from the scope of the
Order.\3\ Note 3. Effective January 1, 2012, ravioli and tortellini
filled with cheese and/or vegetables are also excluded from the
scope of the Order. Note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This sentence is applicable only to the AD Italy Pasta
Order.
\3\ This sentence is applicable only to the CVD Italy Pasta
Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are
certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United
State Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program for
organic products. The organic pasta certification must be retained
by exporters and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to the Order is
dispositive.
Note 1: See Memorandum to Richard Moreland, dated August 25,
1997, which is on file in the CRU.
Note 2: See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, in
Part, 74 FR 41120 (August 14, 2009).
Note 3: See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, In
Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
Note 4: See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews and Revocation, in Part, 79 FR 58319, 58320 (September 29,
2014).
[FR Doc. 2016-14672 Filed 6-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P