Certain Silicon-on-Insulator Wafers; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion for Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 40348 [2016-14593]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
40348
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices
marked as to whether they are the
‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’
version, and that the confidential
business information is clearly
identified by means of brackets. All
written submissions, except for
confidential business information, will
be made available for inspection by
interested parties.
The Commission may include some or
all of the confidential business
information submitted in the course of
this investigation in the report it sends
to the USTR. Additionally, all
information, including confidential
business information, submitted in this
investigation may be disclosed to and
used: (i) By the Commission, its
employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or
maintaining the records of this or a
related proceeding, or (b) in internal
investigations, audits, reviews, and
evaluations relating to the programs,
personnel, and operations of the
Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government
employees and contract personnel for
cybersecurity purposes. The
Commission will not otherwise disclose
any confidential business information in
a manner that would reveal the
operations of the firm supplying the
information.
Summaries of Written Submissions:
The Commission intends to publish
summaries of the positions of interested
persons in an appendix to its report.
Persons wishing to have a summary of
their position included in the appendix
should include a summary with their
written submission. The summary may
not exceed 500 words, should be in
MSWord format or a format that can be
easily converted to MSWord, and
should not include any confidential
business information. The summary will
be published as provided if it meets
these requirements and is germane to
the subject matter of the investigation.
In the appendix the Commission will
identify the name of the organization
furnishing the summary, and will
include a link to the Commission’s
Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) where the full written
submission can be found.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 16, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–14618 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–966]
Certain Silicon-on-Insulator Wafers;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting an Unopposed Motion for
Termination of the Investigation Based
on Withdrawal of the Complaint;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 16) granting an unopposed
motion to terminate the investigation in
whole based on complainant’s
withdrawal of the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3438. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 24, 2015, based on a
complaint filed by Silicon Genesis Corp.
of San Jose, California (‘‘Complainant’’).
80 FR 57641 (Sept. 24, 2015). The
complaint, as amended, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and/or
the sale within the United States after
importation of certain silicon-oninsulator wafers by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,985,742; 6,180,496;
6,294,814; 6,790,747; 7,811,901;
6,013,563 (‘‘the ’563 patent’’); 6,162,705
(‘‘the ’705 patent’’); and 6,103,599 (‘‘the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
’599 patent’’). Id. The notice of
investigation names as a respondent
Soitec S.A., Parc Technologique des
Fontaines of Bernin, France
(‘‘Respondent’’). Id. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) also was
named as a party to the investigation. Id.
Subsequently, the investigation was
partially terminated as to several patent
claims, leaving only asserted claim 1 of
the ’563 patent; claim 1 of the ’705
patent; and claims 1 and 15 of the ’599
patent remaining in the investigation.
See Notice (Feb. 25, 2016) (determining
not to review Order No. 7 (Jan. 22,
2016)); Notice (Mar. 1, 2016)
(determining not to review Order No. 8
(Feb. 2, 2016)); Notice (May 4, 2016)
(determining not to review Order No. 12
(Apr. 5, 2016)); Notice (May 31, 2016)
(determining not to review Order No. 14
(May 5, 2016)).
On May 18, 2016, Complainant filed
an unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation in whole based on its
withdrawal of the complaint. On May
20, 2016, OUII filed a response,
supporting the motion.
On May 20, 2016, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
an ID (Order No. 16) granting the
motion. The ALJ found no extraordinary
circumstances preventing termination of
the investigation and further found that
termination was in the public interest.
No petitions for review of the ID were
filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 15, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–14593 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–941]
Certain Graphics Processing Chips,
Systems on a Chip, and Products
Containing the Same; Commission
Determination To Grant a Joint Motion
To Terminate the Investigation on the
Basis of a Settlement Agreement;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 40348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14593]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-966]
Certain Silicon-on-Insulator Wafers; Commission Determination Not
To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion for
Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 16) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation in whole based on complainant's withdrawal of the
complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3438. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on September 24, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Silicon Genesis
Corp. of San Jose, California (``Complainant''). 80 FR 57641 (Sept. 24,
2015). The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale
within the United States after importation of certain silicon-on-
insulator wafers by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,985,742; 6,180,496; 6,294,814; 6,790,747; 7,811,901;
6,013,563 (``the '563 patent''); 6,162,705 (``the '705 patent''); and
6,103,599 (``the '599 patent''). Id. The notice of investigation names
as a respondent Soitec S.A., Parc Technologique des Fontaines of
Bernin, France (``Respondent''). Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (``OUII'') also was named as a party to the
investigation. Id. Subsequently, the investigation was partially
terminated as to several patent claims, leaving only asserted claim 1
of the '563 patent; claim 1 of the '705 patent; and claims 1 and 15 of
the '599 patent remaining in the investigation. See Notice (Feb. 25,
2016) (determining not to review Order No. 7 (Jan. 22, 2016)); Notice
(Mar. 1, 2016) (determining not to review Order No. 8 (Feb. 2, 2016));
Notice (May 4, 2016) (determining not to review Order No. 12 (Apr. 5,
2016)); Notice (May 31, 2016) (determining not to review Order No. 14
(May 5, 2016)).
On May 18, 2016, Complainant filed an unopposed motion to terminate
the investigation in whole based on its withdrawal of the complaint. On
May 20, 2016, OUII filed a response, supporting the motion.
On May 20, 2016, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
issued an ID (Order No. 16) granting the motion. The ALJ found no
extraordinary circumstances preventing termination of the investigation
and further found that termination was in the public interest. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 15, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-14593 Filed 6-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P