Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam; Notice of Commission determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews, 39711 [2016-14291]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1063–1064 and 1066–1068 (Second Review)] Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam; Notice of Commission determination To Conduct Full FiveYear Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES: Effective June 6, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sherman (202–205–3289), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUMMARY: On June 6, 2016, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). With respect to the orders on the subject merchandise from Brazil, India, Thailand, and Vietnam, the Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (81 FR 10659, March 1, 2016) sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Jun 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 were adequate and determined to proceed to full reviews of the orders. With respect to the order on the subject merchandise from China, the Commission found that the domestic interested party group response was adequate and the respondent interested party group response was inadequate, but that circumstances warranted conducting a full review. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 13, 2016. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2016–14291 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1006] Certain Passenger Vehicle Automotive Wheels; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on April 11, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Daimler AG of Stuttgart, Germany. Supplements to the Complaint were filed on April 28, 2016 and April 29, 2016. On May 2, 2016, the Commission voted on Complainant’s request to postpone the determination on whether to institute an investigation based on the Complaint, which was approved by the Commission. See EDIS Doc. ID 580171 (May 3, 2016). Complainant further supplemented the Complaint on May 18, 2016. The complaint as supplemented alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain passenger vehicle automotive wheels by reason of infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D542,211 (‘‘the ’211 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D582,330 (‘‘the ’330 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D656,078 (‘‘the ’078 SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39711 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D569,776 (‘‘the ’776 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D602,834 (‘‘the ’834 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D582,328 (‘‘the ’328 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D542,726 (‘‘the ’726 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D604,221 (‘‘the ’221 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D570,760 (‘‘the ’760 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D544,823 (‘‘the ’823 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D486,437 (‘‘the ’437 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D562,207 (‘‘the ’207 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D635,904 (‘‘the ’904 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D618,150 (‘‘the ’150 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D585,802 (‘‘the ’802 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D532,733 (‘‘the ’733 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D572,646 (‘‘the ’646 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D578,949 (‘‘the ’949 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D638,772 (‘‘the ’772 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D522,946 (‘‘the ’946 patent’’); U.S. Design Patent No. D638,766 (‘‘the ’766 patent’’); and U.S. Design Patent No. D610,516 (‘‘the ’516 patent’’); and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,614,891 (‘‘the ’891 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,423,458 (‘‘the ’458 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,305,055 (‘‘the ’055 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,807,353 (‘‘the ’353 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,660,727 (‘‘the ’727 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 657,386 (‘‘the ’386 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 285,557 (‘‘the ’557 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,076,271 (‘‘the ’271 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,224,584 (‘‘the ’584 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,309,265 (‘‘the ’265 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,876,643 (‘‘the ’643 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,909,827 (‘‘the ’827 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,654,240 (‘‘the ’240 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,712,292 (‘‘the ’292 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,028,111 (‘‘the ’111 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,699,216 (‘‘the ’216 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,716,842 (‘‘the ’842 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,599,862 (‘‘the ’862 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,028,107 (‘‘the ’107 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,669,601 (‘‘the ’601 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,103,610 (‘‘the ’610 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,028,112 (‘‘the ’112 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,100,860 (‘‘the ’860 mark’’); U.S. Trademark Registration No. E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 39711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14291]



[[Page 39711]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1063-1064 and 1066-1068 (Second Review)]


Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and 
Vietnam; Notice of Commission determination To Conduct Full Five-Year 
Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with 
full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether 
revocation of the antidumping duty orders on frozen warmwater shrimp 
from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a 
reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be 
established and announced at a later date.

DATES: Effective June 6, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sherman (202-205-3289), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
    For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2016, the Commission determined 
that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)). With respect to the orders on the subject merchandise from 
Brazil, India, Thailand, and Vietnam, the Commission found that both 
the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its 
notice of institution (81 FR 10659, March 1, 2016) were adequate and 
determined to proceed to full reviews of the orders. With respect to 
the order on the subject merchandise from China, the Commission found 
that the domestic interested party group response was adequate and the 
respondent interested party group response was inadequate, but that 
circumstances warranted conducting a full review. A record of the 
Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any 
individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office 
of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
    Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant 
to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 13, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-14291 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.