Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 38671-38673 [2016-14048]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
final results of this review.6 The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results
of review.
Additionally, consistent with the
Department’s refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases,
because the Department determined that
TMI/TMM had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR, any
suspended entries that entered under
TMI/TMM’s antidumping duty case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.7
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of this notice of final
results of the administrative review, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For TMI/TMM, which claimed
no shipments, the cash deposit rate will
remain unchanged from the rate
assigned to TMI/TMM in the most
recently completed review of the
company; (2) for previously investigated
or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
who are not under review in this
segment of the proceeding but who have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
of 111.73 percent; 8 and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
6 See
7 See
19 CFR 351.212(b).
Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR
65694.
8 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the 2008–2009
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 80791 (December
23, 2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 7, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–14059 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–864]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products From India: Notice of
Correction to Final Affirmative
Determination; Negative Determination
of Critical Circumstances
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2312.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2,
2016, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the Final
Determination on certain corrosionresistant steel products from India.1 In
the Final Determination the Department
inadvertently omitted its final analysis
of critical circumstances. Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.206(c)(2)(i), the Department
preliminarily determined that critical
AGENCY:
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: Final
Affirmative Determination, 81 FR 35323 (June 2,
2016) (Final Determination).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38671
circumstances did not exist 2 and
received no comments on this issue.
Based on the examination of the
shipping data placed on the record by
the mandatory respondents after the
Preliminary Determination,3 we
examined whether the increase in
imports was massive by comparing
shipments over the period of July 2014
through February 2015, with the period
March 2015 through October 2015 for
the mandatory respondents.4 Because
the Preliminary Determination was
published November 6 (the beginning of
November), we used data through
October in determining critical
circumstances for the mandatory
respondents. For all other producers
and exporters, our critical
circumstances determination continues
to be based on data through August, the
latest month for which GTA data is on
the record, and is thus unchanged from
the Preliminary Determination. The
Department continues to find that
critical circumstances do not exist for
the mandatory respondents, or for all
other producers and exporters.
This correction to the Final
Determination is issued and published
in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: June 8, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–14072 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–952]
Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of
Administrative Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2016.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
AGENCY:
2 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Investigations of Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Preliminary
Determinations of Critical Circumstances, 80 FR
68504 (November 5, 2015).
3 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination, 80 FR
68854 (November 6, 2015) (Preliminary
Determination).
4 See the November 16, 2015, quantity and value
shipment data for October 2015 from the mandatory
respondents.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
38672
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge
(‘‘woven ribbons’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for the
period of review (‘‘POR’’) September 1,
2014, through August 31, 2015. This
review covers one PRC company Yama
Ribbons Co., Ltd., (‘‘Yama Ribbons’’).1
The Department preliminarily finds that
Yama Ribbons did not have reviewable
transactions during the POR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement &
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The products covered by the order are
narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge. The merchandise subject to
the order is classifiable under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings
5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
merchandise also may enter under
HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00;
5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30;
5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90;
5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and
5907.00.80 and under statistical
categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description in the Order remains
dispositive.2
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
69193 (November 09, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
The Department determined in the underlying
investigation that merchandise produced and
exported by Yama Ribbons is excluded from the
antidumping duty order. See also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge from Taiwan and the People’s
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75
FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended in
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from
Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China:
Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982
(September 17, 2010) (‘‘Order’’). However,
merchandise which Yama exports but did not
produce remains subject to the antidumping duty
order on narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge.
2 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, please see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic
of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance (‘‘Preliminary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see
Preliminary Results Decision
Memorandum. This memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Results
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Results Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Results
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that Yama Ribbons did not
have reviewable transactions during the
POR.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results and
may submit case briefs and/or written
comments, filed electronically using
ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, will be due five days after the
due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit
case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding
are requested to submit with each
argument a statement of the issue, a
summary of the argument not to exceed
five pages, and a table of statutes,
regulations, and cases cited, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties, who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate in a hearing
if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically using
ACCESS. Electronically filed case
briefs/written comments and hearing
requests must be received successfully
in their entirety by the Department’s
electronic records system, ACCESS, by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within
30 days after the date of publication of
this notice.3 Hearing requests should
contain: (1) The party’s name, address
and telephone number; (2) the number
of participants; and (3) a list of issues to
be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those issues
raised in the respective case briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date of
the hearing which will be held at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. The Department intends to
issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the
results of its analysis of the issues raised
in any written briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.4 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the
final results of this review. Pursuant to
the Department’s practice in NME cases,
if we continue to determine that Yama
Ribbons had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate of
247.26 percent. For a full discussion of
this practice, see Non-Market Economy
Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of review, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For exports of merchandise
made by Yama Ribbons of merchandise
it did not produce, the cash deposit rate
is the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent,
as stated in the Order; 5 (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters which are not
under review in this segment of the
3 See
Decision Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with
this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19 CFR 351.310(c).
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
5 See Order at 75 FR 53632.
4 See
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
proceeding but which have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
of 247.26 percent; and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties. We are
issuing and publishing these results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: June 7, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Results Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Methodology
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–14048 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 4, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
sawblades) from the People’s Republic
of China (the PRC). The period of review
(POR) is November 1, 2013, through
October 31, 2014. For the final results,
we continue to find that certain
companies covered by this review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2016
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 4, 2015, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC.1 We received
case and rebuttal briefs with respect to
the Preliminary Results. As explained in
the memorandum from the Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, the Department exercised
its discretion to toll all administrative
deadlines due to a closure of the Federal
Government. All deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been
extended by four business days. The
revised deadline for the final results of
this review moved to April 8, 2016.2
Subsequently, we fully extended the
time for completing the final results of
this administrative review to June 7,
2016.3 At the request of interested
parties, we held a hearing on April 20,
2016. We conducted this administrative
review in accordance with section 751
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 75854 (December 4,
2015) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum for the Record from Acting
Assistant Secretary Ron Lorenzen entitled ‘‘Tolling
of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the
Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas’’’
dated January 27, 2016.
3 See Memorandum to Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary Gary Taverman entitled ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review’’ dated March 23, 2016, and Memorandum
to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh
entitled ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: Full Extension
of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review’’ dated May 18, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38673
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
and may also enter under 6804.21.00.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes.
A full description of the scope of the
order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.4 The written
description is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as an appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is also available
to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Enforcement
and Compliance Web site at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Danyang
City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang
Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.,
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export
Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond
Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan
Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and
Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd.,
which have been eligible for separate
rates in previous segments of the
proceeding and are subject to this
review, did not have any reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR.5 After the Preliminary Results,
4 See Memorandum from Deputy Assistant
Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary
Paul Piquado entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China’’ dated June 7, 2016, (Issues and Decision
Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this notice,
at 4–5.
5 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38671-38673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14048]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-952]
Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven Selvedge From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Administrative Review; 2014-
2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2016.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an
[[Page 38672]]
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on narrow woven
ribbons with woven selvedge (``woven ribbons'') from the People's
Republic of China (``PRC'') for the period of review (``POR'')
September 1, 2014, through August 31, 2015. This review covers one PRC
company Yama Ribbons Co., Ltd., (``Yama Ribbons'').\1\ The Department
preliminarily finds that Yama Ribbons did not have reviewable
transactions during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 69193 (November 09, 2015)
(``Initiation Notice''). The Department determined in the underlying
investigation that merchandise produced and exported by Yama Ribbons
is excluded from the antidumping duty order. See also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge
from Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended in Narrow Woven
Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from Taiwan and the People's Republic of
China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (September 17,
2010) (``Order''). However, merchandise which Yama exports but did
not produce remains subject to the antidumping duty order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are narrow woven ribbons with
woven selvedge. The merchandise subject to the order is classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'')
subheadings 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060.
Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00;
5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90;
5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and under
statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; and
6307.90.9889. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in
the Order remains dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, please
see ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge
from the People's Republic of China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently
with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). For a
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see
Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum. This memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version
of the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that Yama Ribbons did not
have reviewable transactions during the POR.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary
results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed
electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication
of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days
after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a
summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of
statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties, who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate in a hearing if one is requested,
must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed
electronically using ACCESS. Electronically filed case briefs/written
comments and hearing requests must be received successfully in their
entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00
p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\3\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The
party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to those issues raised in the respective
case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be
notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.\4\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this
review. Pursuant to the Department's practice in NME cases, if we
continue to determine that Yama Ribbons had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's
case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent. For a full discussion of this
practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For exports of merchandise made by Yama Ribbons of merchandise
it did not produce, the cash deposit rate is the PRC-wide rate of
247.26 percent, as stated in the Order; \5\ (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under
review in this segment of the
[[Page 38673]]
proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate rate the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Order at 75 FR 53632.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing
these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: June 7, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Results Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Methodology
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-14048 Filed 6-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P