Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 36876-36881 [2016-13533]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
36876
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Background
International Trade Administration
On September 24, 2015, the CIT
issued the Remand Order, directing the
Department to reconsider the
constructed value (CV) profit rate
calculation used in the dumping margin
¨
analysis for Yucel, and granting the
Department a voluntary remand to
reconsider the duty drawback
¨
adjustment for Yucel.3 On remand, the
¨
Department: (1) Recalculated Yucel’s CV
¨
profit rate by replacing Yucel’s CV profit
and CV selling expenses with an
aggregate figure representing the
calculated CV profit and selling
expenses of Borusan Manesmann Boru
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan
Istikbal Ticaret A.S., the other
mandatory respondent in this
investigation, pursuant to section
773(e)(2)(B)(ii) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act); and (2) denied a
duty drawback adjustment in its entirety
¨
for Yucel in its margin calculation.4 As
a result, the estimated weighted-average
¨
dumping margin for Yucel changed. On
May 10, 2016, the Court upheld the
Final Remand Redetermination in full.5
[A–489–816]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the Republic of Turkey: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
the Final Determination of the Less
Than Fair Value Investigation and
Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 10, 2016, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
sustained the Final Remand
Redetermination 1 pertaining to the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of
certain oil country tubular goods from
the Republic of Turkey (OCTG from
Turkey).2 Consistent with the decision
of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken
Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the
Department is notifying the public that
the CIT’s final judgment in this case is
not in harmony with the Final
Determination, and that the Department
is amending the Final Determination
with respect to Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve
¸
¨
Ticaret A.S. and Yucel Boru Ithalat¸
Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S. (collectively,
¸
¨
Yucel). The period of investigation (POI)
is July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013.
DATES: Effective May 20, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand (Final Remand Redetermination)
in Maverick Tube Corporation et al v. United States,
Consol. Court No. 14–00244, Slip Op. 15–107 (Ct.
Int’l Trade September 24, 2015) (Remand Order),
aff’d Maverick Tube Corporation et al v. United
States, Consol. Court No. 14–00244, Slip Op. 16–
46, (Ct. Int’l Trade May 10, 2016). The Final
Remand Redetermination is accessible at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/remands/15-107.pdf.
2 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
the Republic of Turkey: Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final
Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 79
FR 41971 (July 18, 2014) (Final Determination).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
appeal or if appealed, pending a final
and conclusive court decision.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Since the Final Determination, the
Department has not established a new
¨
cash deposit rate for Yucel. As a result,
in accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B)
of the Act, the Department will instruct
CBP to collect a cash deposit of 13.59
percent, adjusted where appropriate for
export subsidies,6 for entries of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
¨
by Yucel, effective May 20, 2016.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–13536 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Timken Notice
International Trade Administration
In its decision in Timken, as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held
that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
Act, the Department must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
May 10, 2016, final judgment affirming
the Final Remand Redetermination
constitutes a final decision of that court
which is not in harmony with the Final
Determination. This notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
[A–570–032]
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court
decision, the Department is amending
the Final Determination with respect to
¨
Yucel’s weighted-average dumping
margin for the period July 1, 2012,
through June 30, 2013, effective May 20,
2016. The revised weighted-average
dumping margin for Cayirova Boru
¸
¨
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Yucel Boru
¸
Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S.
¸
¨
(collectively, Yucel) is 13.59 percent.
Accordingly, the Department will
continue the suspension of liquidation
pending the expiration of the period of
3 See Remand Order, Slip Op. 15–107 at 25–26,
30–38.
4 See Final Remand Redetermination at 7–9, 24–
28.
5 See Maverick, Slip Op. 16–46 at 11–22.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
6 See Final Determination, 79 FR at 41972–73 (‘‘In
the final determination of the companion
countervailing duty investigation on OCTG from
Turkey, the Department determined that the all
other companies benefitted from export subsidies.
Pursuant to sections 735(c)(1) and 772(c)(1)(C) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), the Department will
instruct CBP to require cash deposits equal to the
weighted-average dumping margins indicated
below, adjusted where appropriate for export
subsidies’’); see also Final Results of Remand
Redetermination pursuant to the CIT orders in
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.
and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret v. United States, 61 F.
Supp. 3d 1306 (April 22, 2015) and Maverick Tube
Corporation v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14–
00229, Slip Op. 15–59 (June 15, 2015) (accessible
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/1559.pdf), and Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
With the Final Determination of the Countervailing
Duty Investigation; 81 FR 12691, (March 10, 2016)
(in which the Department calculated the ‘‘All
Others’’ subsidy rate of 2.39 percent, including the
countervailable subsidy rate for export subsidies in
¨
the amount of 0.22 percent). Yucel’s cash-deposit
rate will be calculated by subtracting the
countervailable subsidy rate for export subsidies
calculated in the countervailing duty final results
of redetermination, 0.22 percent, from the
weighted-average dumping margin rate of 13.59
percent, i.e., 13.37 percent.
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) preliminarily
determines that certain iron mechanical
transfer drive components (‘‘IMTDC’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) are being, or are likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’), as provided in section
733 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’). The period of
investigation (‘‘POI’’) is April 1, 2015,
through September 30, 2015. The
estimated margins of sales at LTFV are
shown in the ‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’ section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective June 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krisha Hill or Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482–
3518, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Department published the notice
of initiation of this investigation on
November 25, 2015.1 On December 18,
2015, in accordance with section
777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department
selected the two exporters accounting
for the largest volume of IMTDC from
the PRC during the POI (i.e., NOK
(Wuxi) Vibration Control China Co. Ltd.
(‘‘NVCC’’) and Powermach Import &
Export Co., Ltd. (Sichuan)
(‘‘Powermach’’) as mandatory
respondents. Nine other companies filed
separate rate applications. On April 19,
2016, NVCC withdrew from
participation as a mandatory respondent
in the investigation.2 Pursuant to
section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the
Department postponed this preliminary
LTFV determination by 50 days until
May 31, 2016.3 For a complete
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this investigation, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1 See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from Canada and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigations, 80 FR 73716 (November 25,
2016) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
2 See Letter from NVCC to the Secretary of
Commerce ‘‘Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from the People’s Republic of China:
Withdrawal from Investigations,’’ dated April 19,
2016 (‘‘NVCC Non-Participation Letter’’).
3 See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from Canada and the People’s
Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations of Antidumping Duty
Investigations, 81 FR 12687 (March 10, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
that is dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice.4
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Department’s Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed and the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical.
Tolling and Postponement of Deadline
for Preliminary Determination
As explained in the memorandum
from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
partial closure of the Federal
Government due from Snowstorm
‘‘Jonas’’ from January 22, through
January 27, 2016. Therefore, all
deadlines in this segment of the
proceeding have been extended by four
business days.5 If the new deadline falls
on a non-business day, in accordance
with the Department’s practice, the
deadline will become the next business
day.6 In this case, the deadline is May
31, 2016.
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is iron mechanical transfer
drive components. The merchandise
subject to this investigation is properly
classified under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 8483.30.8090,
8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040,
8483.50.9080, 8483.90.3000,
4 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determination of the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Certain Iron Mechanical
Transfer Drive Components from the People’s
Republic of China’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum’’).
5 See Memorandum for the Record from Ron
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Tolling of
Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the
Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas’,’’
dated January 27, 2016.
6 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36877
8483.90.8080. Covered merchandise
may also enter under the following
HTSUS subheadings: 7325.10.0080,
7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010,
7326.19.0080, 8431.31.0040,
8431.31.0060, 8431.39.0010,
8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise under investigation is
dispositive. For a complete description
of the scope of the investigation, see
Appendix I to this notice.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to
the Department’s regulations,7 the
Initiation Notice set aside a period of
time for parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., ‘‘scope’’).8
Certain interested parties commented on
the scope of the investigation, as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice. For a
summary of the product coverage
comments and rebuttal responses
submitted to the record, and an
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Department’s Scope Memorandum
issued concurrently with this notice.9
On March 30, 2016, Petitioner filed an
amendment to the scope of the
investigation to exclude certain finished
torsional vibration dampers (‘‘TVD’’).10
On April 8, 2016, the Department
preliminarily excluded TVDs from the
scope of the investigation.11 On May 16,
2016, Petitioner filed an additional
amendment to the scope to exclude
certain light-duty, fixed- and variablepitch, non-synchronous sheaves and
certain bushings.12 As discussed in the
7 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
8 See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 73716.
9 See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia,
Director, Office IV, to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Certain
Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from
Canada and the People’s Republic of China: Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (‘‘Scope Memorandum’’).
10 See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of
Commerce, entitled ‘‘Certain Iron Mechanical
Transfer Drive Components from Canada and the
People’s Republic of China: Petitioner’s
Amendment to the Scope,’’ dated March 30, 2016.
11 See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia,
Director, Office IV, to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Certain
Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from
Canada and the People’s Republic of China: Scope
Comments Regarding Exclusion of Certain Finished
Torsional Vibration Dampers,’’ dated April 8, 2016.
12 See Letter from TB Woods to the Department,
entitled ‘‘Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from Canada and the People’s
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
Continued
08JNN1
36878
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
Scope Memorandum, the Department
has preliminarily excluded certain lightduty, fixed- and variable-pitch, nonsynchronous sheaves and certain
bushings. For a complete description of
the scope exclusion language, see the
full scope at Appendix II to this notice
as well as the Department’s Scope
Memorandum issued concurrently with
this notice.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. We calculated export
prices in accordance with section 772 of
the Act. Because the PRC is a nonmarket economy, within the meaning of
section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated
normal value (NV) in accordance with
section 773(c) of the Act. Further, in
accordance with sections 776(a) and (b)
of the Act, we preliminarily determined
to apply facts otherwise available with
an adverse inference in determining the
weighted-average dumping margin for
the PRC-wide entity and normal value,
in part, for Powermach. For a full
discussion of the Department’s
methodology, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
respond to the Department’s request for
supplemental information. The
Department has treated these three
companies as part of the PRC-wide
entity. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Separate Rates
The Department received separate rate
applications from nine companies, in
addition to the two mandatory
respondents. The Department has
preliminarily granted separate-rate
status to all of the companies which
provided separate rates information,
except NVCC, which withdrew from
participation as a mandatory respondent
in this investigation, Baldor Electric
Canada (‘‘Baldor’’), and Yueqing Bethel
Shaft Collar Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Yueqing Bethel’’), which did not
Combination Rates
In the Initiation Notice,13 the
Department stated that it would
calculate combination rates for the
respondents that are eligible for a
separate rate in this investigation. Policy
Bulletin 05.1 describes this practice.14
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist during
the period April 1, 2015, through
September 30, 2015:
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Producer
Powermach Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Sichuan)/Sichuan Dawn
Precision Technology Co., Ltd./Sichuan Dawn Foundry Co.,
Ltd./Powermach Co., Ltd.
Fuqing Jiacheng Trading Corporation Limited ...........................
Haiyang Jingweida Gearing Co., Ltd ..........................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Powermach Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Sichuan)/Sichuan
Dawn Precision Technology Co., Ltd./Sichuan Dawn Foundry Co., Ltd./Powermach Co., Ltd.
Fuzhou Min Yue Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd ....................
Haiyang Jingweida Gearing Co., Ltd .........................................
Shijiazhuang CAPT Power Transmission Co., Ltd ....................
Shanghai CPT Machinery Co., Ltd ............................................
Yueqing Bethel Shaft Collar Manufacturing Co., Ltd ................
Kezheng (Fuzhou) Mechanical & Electrical Manufacture Co.,
Ltd.
Handan Hengfa Transmission Co., Ltd .....................................
Shijiazhuang Lihua Mechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...........
Xingtai Shengjia Machinery and Equipment Factory ................
Shanghai Keli Machinery Co., Ltd .............................................
Jiangsu Zhengya Technology Co., Ltd ......................................
Taizhou Feiyang Metal Spinning Co., Ltd .................................
Taizhou Pengxun Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...............
Guangde Ronghua Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd .............
Qiuxian Hengxin Machinery Co., Ltd .........................................
Reach Machinery Enterprise .....................................................
Chengdu Novo Machinery Co., Ltd ...........................................
Chengdu Leno Machinery Co., Ltd ............................................
Shijiazhuang CAPT Power Transmission Co., Ltd ....................
Sichuan Dawn Precision Technology Co., Ltd ..........................
Zhejiang Damon Industrial Equipment Co., Ltd ........................
Zhejiang Dongxing Auto Parts Co., Ltd .....................................
....................................................................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd ..................................................
Shijiazhuang CAPT Power Transmission Co., Ltd .....................
Xinguang Technology Co. Ltd of Sichuan Province ...................
Zhejiang Damon Industrial Equipment Co., Ltd .........................
Zhejiang Dongxing Auto Parts Co., Ltd ......................................
PRC-Wide Entity .........................................................................
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.17
401.68
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, the Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of IMTDC from the PRC, as
described in the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation’’ section, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), the
Department will instruct CBP to require
a cash deposit 15 equal to the weightedaverage amount by which NV exceeds
U.S. price, adjusted where appropriate
for export subsidies and estimated
Republic of China: Petitioner’s Additional
Amendment to the Scope,’’ dated May 16, 2016.
13 See Initiation Notice at 73720–21.
14 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
Bulletin 05.1), available on the Department’s Web
site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull051.pdf.
15 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the
Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional
Measures Period in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
Suspension of Liquidation
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
2.17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
domestic subsidy pass-through,16 as
follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the
exporter/producer combinations listed
in the table above will be the rate
identified in the table; (2) for all
combinations of PRC exporters/
producers of merchandise under
consideration that have not received
their own separate rate above, the cashdeposit rate will be the cash deposit rate
established for the PRC-wide entity; and
(3) for all non-PRC exporters of
merchandise under consideration which
have not received their own separate
rate above, the cash-deposit rate will be
the cash deposit rate applicable to the
PRC exporter/producer combination
that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until
further notice.
In LTFV investigations with a
companion countervailing duty (CVD)
investigation, we normally adjust
antidumping duty cash deposit rates by
the amount of export subsidies, where
appropriate. In the companion CVD
investigation, we preliminarily found
that Powermach did not receive export
subsidies. The rate for all-others
companies in the CVD case was based
on Powermach’s rate, and thus the allothers companies did not receive an
export subsidy rate. Therefore, no offset
to Powermach’s or the separate rate
entities’ cash deposit rates for export
subsidies is necessary. Additionally, we
likewise are not adjusting the cash
deposit rate applicable to the PRC-wide
entity for export subsidies.
Pursuant to 777A(f) of the Act, we are
not adjusting preliminary cash deposit
rates for estimated domestic subsidy
pass-through. Based on the data on the
record of this investigation, the
Department does not find a general
decrease in the U.S. average import
price during the relevant period. Thus,
the Department preliminarily finds that
the requirement under section
777A(f)(1)(B) of the Act has not been
met, and the Department did not make
an adjustment under Section 777A(f) of
the Act.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
16 See sections 772(c)(1)(C) and 777A(f) of the
Act, respectively. Unlike in administrative reviews,
the Department calculates the adjustment for export
subsidies in investigations not in the margin
calculation program, but in the cash deposit
instructions issued to CBP. See, e.g., Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
and Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Certain Lined Paper Products from
India, 71 FR 45012 (August 8, 2006), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
36879
within five days after public
announcement of the preliminary
determination in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs or other
written comments may be submitted to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance no later than seven
days after the date on which the final
verification report is issued in this
proceeding and rebuttal briefs, limited
to issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for case briefs.17
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically using
ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the Department’s
electronic records system, ACCESS, by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.18 Hearing requests should
contain the party’s name, address, and
telephone number, the number of
participants, and a list of the issues
parties intend to present at the hearing.
If a request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time
and location to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
postponement of a final antidumping
determination be accompanied by a
request for extension of provisional
measures from a four-month period to a
period not more than six months in
duration.
On May 5, 2016, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), Powermach requested
that the Department postpone its final
determination, and requested that the
Department extend the application of
the provisional measures prescribed
under section 733(d) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month
period to a period not to exceed six
months.19 On May 16, 2016, Petitioner
requested that the Department postpone
the final determination in the event that
the Department makes a negative
preliminary determination.20 Further,
on May 17, 2016, NVCC also requested
that the Department postpone its final
determination and requested that the
Department extend the application of
the provisional measures prescribed
under section 733(d) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month
period to a period not to exceed six
months.21
In accordance with section
735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii) and (e)(2), because (1)
our preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporters
account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise; and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial
exist, we are postponing the final
determination and extending the
provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not greater than six
months. Accordingly, we will make our
final determination no later than 135
days after the date of publication of this
preliminary determination, pursuant to
section 735(a)(2) of the Act.22
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides
that a final determination may be
postponed until not later than 135 days
after the date of the publication of the
preliminary determination if, in the
event of an affirmative preliminary
determination by the Department, a
request for such postponement is made
by exporters who account for a
significant proportion of exports of the
subject merchandise, or in the event of
a negative preliminary determination by
the Department, a request for such
postponement is made by the petitioner.
19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that
requests by respondents for
International Trade Commission (ITC)
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
affirmative preliminary determination of
sales at LTFV. Because the preliminary
determination in this investigation is
17 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
18 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19 See Letter from Powermach to the Secretary of
Commerce ‘‘Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from the People’s Republic of China:
Request for Extension of Final Determination,’’
dated May 5, 2016 (‘‘Powermach Extension
Request’’).
20 See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of
Commerce ‘‘Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from Canada and the People’s
Republic of China: Petitioner’s Request to Extend
the Final Determinations,’’ dated May 16, 2016.
21 See Letter from NVCC to the Secretary of
Commerce ‘‘Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components from the People’s Republic of China:
Request to Postpone Final Determination,’’ dated
May 17, 2016.
22 See 19 CFR 351.210(e).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
36880
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act
requires that the ITC make its final
determination whether the domestic
industry in the United States is
materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports of
IMTDC from the PRC before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after our final determination. Because
we are postponing the deadline for our
final determination to 135 days from the
date of publication of this preliminary
determination, as discussed above, the
ITC will make its final determination no
later than 45 days after our final
determination.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
List of Topics Discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Summary
Background
Selection of Respondents
Period of Investigation
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Scope Comments
Scope of the Investigation
Product Characteristics
Discussion of the Methodology
Non-Market Economy Country
Surrogate Country and Surrogate
Value Comments
Separate Rates
Dumping Margin for the Separate Rate
Companies
Combination Rates
The PRC-wide Entity
Application of Facts Available and
Adverse Inferences
Application of Partial AFA
Single Entity Treatment
Date of Sale
Fair Value Comparisons
U.S. Price
Normal Value
Factor Valuation Methodology
Verification
Export Subsidy Adjustment
International Trade Commission
Notification
Conclusion
Appendix I: Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation
are iron mechanical transfer drive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
components, whether finished or unfinished
(i.e., blanks or castings). Subject iron
mechanical transfer drive components are in
the form of wheels or cylinders with a center
bore hole that may have one or more grooves
or teeth in their outer circumference that
guide or mesh with a flat or ribbed belt or
like device and are often referred to as
sheaves, pulleys, flywheels, flat pulleys,
idlers, conveyer pulleys, synchronous
sheaves, and timing pulleys. The products
covered by this investigation also include
bushings, which are iron mechanical transfer
drive components in the form of a cylinder
and which fit into the bore holes of other
mechanical transfer drive components to lock
them into drive shafts by means of elements
such as teeth, bolts, or screws.
Iron mechanical transfer drive components
subject to this investigation are those not less
than 4.00 inches (101 mm) in the maximum
nominal outer diameter.
Unfinished iron mechanical transfer drive
components (i.e., blanks or castings) possess
the approximate shape of the finished iron
mechanical transfer drive component and
have not yet been machined to final
specification after the initial casting, forging
or like operations. These machining
processes may include cutting, punching,
notching, boring, threading, mitering, or
chamfering.
Subject merchandise includes iron
mechanical transfer drive components as
defined above that have been finished or
machined in a third country, including but
not limited to finishing/machining processes
such as cutting, punching, notching, boring,
threading, mitering, or chamfering, or any
other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of
the investigation if performed in the country
of manufacture of the iron mechanical
transfer drive components.
Subject iron mechanical transfer drive
components are covered by the scope of the
investigation regardless of width, design, or
iron type (e.g., gray, white, or ductile iron).
Subject iron mechanical transfer drive
components are covered by the scope of the
investigation regardless of whether they have
non-iron attachments or parts and regardless
of whether they are entered with other
mechanical transfer drive components or as
part of a mechanical transfer drive assembly
(which typically includes one or more of the
iron mechanical transfer drive components
identified above, and which may also include
other parts such as a belt, coupling and/or
shaft). When entered as a mechanical transfer
drive assembly, only the iron components
that meet the physical description of covered
merchandise are covered merchandise, not
the other components in the mechanical
transfer drive assembly (e.g., belt, coupling,
shaft).
For purposes of this investigation, a
covered product is of ‘‘iron’’ where the article
has a carbon content of 1.7 percent by weight
or above, regardless of the presence and
amount of additional alloying elements.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Excluded from the scope are finished
torsional vibration dampers (TVDs). A
finished TVD is an engine component
composed of three separate components: an
inner ring, a rubber ring and an outer ring.
The inner ring is an iron wheel or cylinder
with a bore hole to fit a crank shaft which
forms a seal to prevent leakage of oil from the
engine. The rubber ring is a dampening
medium between the inner and outer rings
that effectively reduces the torsional
vibration. The outer ring, which may be
made of materials other than iron, may or
may not have grooves in its outer
circumference. To constitute a finished
excluded TVD, the product must be
composed of each of the three parts
identified above and the three parts must be
permanently affixed to one another such that
both the inner ring and the outer ring are
permanently affixed to the rubber ring. A
finished TVD is excluded only if it meets the
physical description provided above;
merchandise that otherwise meets the
description of the scope and does not satisfy
the physical description of excluded finished
TVDs above is still covered by the scope of
the investigation regardless of end use or
identification as a TVD.
The scope also excludes light-duty, fixedpitch, non-synchronous sheaves (‘‘excludable
LDFPN sheaves’’) with each of the following
characteristics: Made from grey iron
designated as ASTM (North American
specification) Grade 30 or lower, GB/T
(Chinese specification) Grade HT200 or
lower, DIN (German specification) GG 20 or
lower, or EN (European specification) EN–
GJL 200 or lower; having no more than two
grooves; having a maximum face width of no
more than 1.75 inches, where the face width
is the width of the part at its outside
diameter; having a maximum outside
diameter of not more than 18.75 inches; and
having no teeth on the outside or datum
diameter. Excludable LDFPN sheaves must
also either have a maximum straight bore size
of 1.6875 inches with a maximum hub
diameter of 2.875 inches; or else have a
tapered bore measuring 1.625 inches at the
large end, a maximum hub diameter of 3.50
inches, a length through tapered bore of 1.0
inches, exactly two tapped holes that are 180
degrees apart, and a 2.0-inch bolt circle on
the face of the hub. Excludable LDFPN
sheaves more than 6.75 inches in outside
diameter must also have an arm or spoke
construction.23 Further, excludable LDFPN
sheaves must have a groove profile as
indicated in the table below:
23 An arm or spoke construction is where arms or
spokes (typically 3 to 6) connect the outside
diameter of the sheave with the hub of the sheave.
This is in contrast to a block construction (in which
the material between the hub and the outside
diameter is solid with a uniform thickness that is
the same thickness as the hub of the sheave) or a
web construction (in which the material between
the hub and the outside diameter is solid but is
thinner than at the hub of the sheave).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
36881
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
MA/AK
MA/AK
MB/BK
MB/BK
(A,
(A,
(A,
(A,
3L, 4L) .....................................................
3L, 4L) .....................................................
B, 4L, 5L) ................................................
B, 4L, 5L) ................................................
In addition to the above characteristics,
excludable LDFPN sheaves must also have a
maximum weight (pounds-per-piece) as
follows: For excludable LDFPN sheaves with
one groove and an outside diameter of greater
than 4.0 inches but less than or equal to 8.0
inches, the maximum weight is 4.7 pounds;
for excludable LDFPN sheaves with two
grooves and an outside diameter of greater
than 4.0 inches but less than or equal to 8.0
inches, the maximum weight is 8.5 pounds;
for excludable LDFPN sheaves with one
groove and an outside diameter of greater
than 8.0 inches but less than or equal to 12.0
inches, the maximum weight is 8.5 pounds;
for excludable LDFPN sheaves with two
grooves and an outside diameter of greater
than 8.0 inches but less than or equal to 12.0
inches, the maximum weight is 15.0 pounds;
for excludable LDFPN sheaves with one
groove and an outside diameter of greater
than 12.0 inches but less than or equal to
15.0 inches, the maximum weight is 13.3
pounds; for excludable LDFPN sheaves with
two grooves and an outside diameter of
greater than 12.0 inches but less than or
equal to 15.0 inches, the maximum weight is
17.5 pounds; for excludable LDFPN sheaves
with one groove and an outside diameter of
greater than 15.0 inches but less than or
equal to 18.75 inches, the maximum weight
is 16.5 pounds; and for excludable LDFPN
sheaves with two grooves and an outside
diameter of greater than 15.0 inches but less
than or equal to 18.75 inches, the maximum
weight is 26.5 pounds.
The scope also excludes light-duty,
variable-pitch, non-synchronous sheaves
with each of the following characteristics:
Made from grey iron designated as ASTM
(North American specification) Grade 30 or
lower, GB/T (Chinese specification) Grade
HT200 or lower, DIN (German specification)
GG 20 or lower, or EN (European
specification) EN–GJL 200 or lower; having
no more than 2 grooves; having a maximum
overall width of less than 2.25 inches with
a single groove, or of 3.25 inches or less with
two grooves; having a maximum outside
diameter of not more than 7.5 inches; having
a maximum bore size of 1.625 inches; having
either one or two identical, internallythreaded (i.e., with threads on the inside
diameter), adjustable (rotating) flange(s) on
an externally-threaded hub (i.e., with threads
on the outside diameter) that enable(s) the
width (opening) of the groove to be changed;
and having no teeth on the outside or datum
diameter.
The scope also excludes certain IMTDC
bushings. An IMTDC bushing is excluded
only if it has a tapered angle of greater than
or equal to 10 degrees, where the angle is
measured between one outside tapered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Top width
range of
each groove
(inches)
Outside diameter
(inches)
Size (belt profile)
≤5.45
>5.45
≤7.40
>7.40
....................................................
but ≤18.75 ..................................
....................................................
but ≤18.75 ..................................
surface and the directly opposing outside
tapered surface.
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 8483.30.8090,
8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040, 8483.50.9080,
8483.90.3000, 8483.90.8080. Covered
merchandise may also enter under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010,
7326.19.0080, 8431.31.0040, 8431.31.0060,
8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000. These
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–13533 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–807]
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe From the United Arab Emirates:
Affirmative Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) preliminarily determines
that circular welded carbon-quality steel
pipe (CWP) from the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) is being, or is likely to
be, sold in the United States at less than
fair value (LTFV), as provided in section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). The period of
investigation (POI) is October 1, 2014,
through September 30, 2015. The
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins of sales at LTFV are shown in
the ‘‘Preliminary Determination’’
section of this notice. Interested parties
are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Effective June 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitley Herndon or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
0.484–0.499
0.499–0.509
0.607–0.618
0.620–0.631
Maximum
height
(inches)
Angle
0.531
0.531
0.632
0.635
34°
38°
34°
38°
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6274 or (202) 482–5973,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this
investigation on November 17, 2015.1
For a complete description of the events
that followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the memorandum that
is dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.2 There are two mandatory
respondents participating in this
investigation, Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes
Ind. L.L.C. (Ajmal Steel) and Universal
Tube and Plastic Industries, LLC—Jebel
Ali Branch, Universal Tube and Pipe
Industries, and KHK Scaffolding and
Framework LLC (collectively,
Universal). The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is CWP from the UAE.
1 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, the
Philippines, the United Arab Emirates, and the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 73708
(November 25, 2015).
2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates’’
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36876-36881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13533]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-032]
Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components From the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
[[Page 36877]]
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') preliminarily
determines that certain iron mechanical transfer drive components
(``IMTDC'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') are being, or
are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value
(``LTFV''), as provided in section 733 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ``Act''). The period of investigation (``POI'') is April
1, 2015, through September 30, 2015. The estimated margins of sales at
LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this
notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective June 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill or Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4037 or (202) 482-3518, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the notice of initiation of this
investigation on November 25, 2015.\1\ On December 18, 2015, in
accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department
selected the two exporters accounting for the largest volume of IMTDC
from the PRC during the POI (i.e., NOK (Wuxi) Vibration Control China
Co. Ltd. (``NVCC'') and Powermach Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Sichuan)
(``Powermach'') as mandatory respondents. Nine other companies filed
separate rate applications. On April 19, 2016, NVCC withdrew from
participation as a mandatory respondent in the investigation.\2\
Pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department postponed
this preliminary LTFV determination by 50 days until May 31, 2016.\3\
For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation
of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum that is
dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from
Canada and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-
Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 73716 (November 25, 2016)
(``Initiation Notice'').
\2\ See Letter from NVCC to the Secretary of Commerce ``Certain
Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from the People's Republic
of China: Withdrawal from Investigations,'' dated April 19, 2016
(``NVCC Non-Participation Letter'').
\3\ See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from
Canada and the People's Republic of China: Postponement of
Preliminary Determinations of Antidumping Duty Investigations, 81 FR
12687 (March 10, 2016).
\4\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination of the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer
Drive Components from the People's Republic of China''
(``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department's
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical.
Tolling and Postponement of Deadline for Preliminary Determination
As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion
to toll deadlines for the duration of the partial closure of the
Federal Government due from Snowstorm ``Jonas'' from January 22,
through January 27, 2016. Therefore, all deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by four business days.\5\ If the new
deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with the
Department's practice, the deadline will become the next business
day.\6\ In this case, the deadline is May 31, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum for the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled
``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government
Closure during Snowstorm `Jonas','' dated January 27, 2016.
\6\ See Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business
Day'' Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to
the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is iron mechanical
transfer drive components. The merchandise subject to this
investigation is properly classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings 8483.30.8090,
8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040, 8483.50.9080, 8483.90.3000, 8483.90.8080.
Covered merchandise may also enter under the following HTSUS
subheadings: 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010, 7326.19.0080,
8431.31.0040, 8431.31.0060, 8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive. For a complete
description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I to this
notice.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\7\
the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., ``scope'').\8\ Certain
interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation, as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice. For a summary of the product
coverage comments and rebuttal responses submitted to the record, and
an accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments timely
received, see the Department's Scope Memorandum issued concurrently
with this notice.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296,
27323 (May 19, 1997).
\8\ See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 73716.
\9\ See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Office
IV, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Certain Iron
Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from Canada and the People's
Republic of China: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determinations,'' dated concurrently with this notice
(``Scope Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 30, 2016, Petitioner filed an amendment to the scope of
the investigation to exclude certain finished torsional vibration
dampers (``TVD'').\10\ On April 8, 2016, the Department preliminarily
excluded TVDs from the scope of the investigation.\11\ On May 16, 2016,
Petitioner filed an additional amendment to the scope to exclude
certain light-duty, fixed- and variable-pitch, non-synchronous sheaves
and certain bushings.\12\ As discussed in the
[[Page 36878]]
Scope Memorandum, the Department has preliminarily excluded certain
light-duty, fixed- and variable-pitch, non-synchronous sheaves and
certain bushings. For a complete description of the scope exclusion
language, see the full scope at Appendix II to this notice as well as
the Department's Scope Memorandum issued concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce,
entitled ``Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from
Canada and the People's Republic of China: Petitioner's Amendment to
the Scope,'' dated March 30, 2016.
\11\ See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Office
IV, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Certain Iron
Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from Canada and the People's
Republic of China: Scope Comments Regarding Exclusion of Certain
Finished Torsional Vibration Dampers,'' dated April 8, 2016.
\12\ See Letter from TB Woods to the Department, entitled
``Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from Canada and
the People's Republic of China: Petitioner's Additional Amendment to
the Scope,'' dated May 16, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. We calculated export prices in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy, within
the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated normal value
(NV) in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. Further, in
accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, we preliminarily
determined to apply facts otherwise available with an adverse inference
in determining the weighted-average dumping margin for the PRC-wide
entity and normal value, in part, for Powermach. For a full discussion
of the Department's methodology, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Separate Rates
The Department received separate rate applications from nine
companies, in addition to the two mandatory respondents. The Department
has preliminarily granted separate-rate status to all of the companies
which provided separate rates information, except NVCC, which withdrew
from participation as a mandatory respondent in this investigation,
Baldor Electric Canada (``Baldor''), and Yueqing Bethel Shaft Collar
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (``Yueqing Bethel''), which did not respond to
the Department's request for supplemental information. The Department
has treated these three companies as part of the PRC-wide entity. For a
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Combination Rates
In the Initiation Notice,\13\ the Department stated that it would
calculate combination rates for the respondents that are eligible for a
separate rate in this investigation. Policy Bulletin 05.1 describes
this practice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Initiation Notice at 73720-21.
\14\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1,
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy
Countries,'' (April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on
the Department's Web site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist during the period April 1, 2015,
through September 30, 2015:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Exporter Producer average margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powermach Import & Export Co., Powermach Import & 2.17
Ltd. (Sichuan)/Sichuan Dawn Export Co., Ltd.
Precision Technology Co., Ltd./ (Sichuan)/Sichuan Dawn
Sichuan Dawn Foundry Co., Ltd./ Precision Technology
Powermach Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd./Sichuan Dawn
Foundry Co., Ltd./
Powermach Co., Ltd.
Fuqing Jiacheng Trading Fuzhou Min Yue 2.17
Corporation Limited. Mechanical &
Electrical Co., Ltd.
Haiyang Jingweida Gearing Co., Haiyang Jingweida 2.17
Ltd. Gearing Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Shijiazhuang CAPT Power 2.17
Transmission Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Shanghai CPT Machinery 2.17
Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Yueqing Bethel Shaft 2.17
Collar Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Kezheng (Fuzhou) 2.17
Mechanical &
Electrical Manufacture
Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Handan Hengfa 2.17
Transmission Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Shijiazhuang Lihua 2.17
Mechanical
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Xingtai Shengjia 2.17
Machinery and
Equipment Factory.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Shanghai Keli Machinery 2.17
Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Jiangsu Zhengya 2.17
Technology Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Taizhou Feiyang Metal 2.17
Spinning Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Taizhou Pengxun 2.17
Machinery
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Guangde Ronghua 2.17
Machinery
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Qiuxian Hengxin 2.17
Machinery Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Reach Machinery 2.17
Enterprise.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Chengdu Novo Machinery 2.17
Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Powertrans Co., Ltd... Chengdu Leno Machinery 2.17
Co., Ltd.
Shijiazhuang CAPT Power Shijiazhuang CAPT Power 2.17
Transmission Co., Ltd. Transmission Co., Ltd.
Xinguang Technology Co. Ltd of Sichuan Dawn Precision 2.17
Sichuan Province. Technology Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Damon Industrial Zhejiang Damon 2.17
Equipment Co., Ltd. Industrial Equipment
Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Dongxing Auto Parts Zhejiang Dongxing Auto 2.17
Co., Ltd. Parts Co., Ltd.
PRC-Wide Entity................ ....................... 401.68
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of all entries of IMTDC from the PRC, as described in the
``Scope of the Investigation'' section, entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit \15\ equal to the weighted-average amount by
which NV exceeds U.S. price, adjusted where appropriate for export
subsidies and estimated
[[Page 36879]]
domestic subsidy pass-through,\16\ as follows: (1) The cash deposit
rate for the exporter/producer combinations listed in the table above
will be the rate identified in the table; (2) for all combinations of
PRC exporters/producers of merchandise under consideration that have
not received their own separate rate above, the cash-deposit rate will
be the cash deposit rate established for the PRC-wide entity; and (3)
for all non-PRC exporters of merchandise under consideration which have
not received their own separate rate above, the cash-deposit rate will
be the cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC exporter/producer
combination that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
\16\ See sections 772(c)(1)(C) and 777A(f) of the Act,
respectively. Unlike in administrative reviews, the Department
calculates the adjustment for export subsidies in investigations not
in the margin calculation program, but in the cash deposit
instructions issued to CBP. See, e.g., Notice of Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, 71
FR 45012 (August 8, 2006), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In LTFV investigations with a companion countervailing duty (CVD)
investigation, we normally adjust antidumping duty cash deposit rates
by the amount of export subsidies, where appropriate. In the companion
CVD investigation, we preliminarily found that Powermach did not
receive export subsidies. The rate for all-others companies in the CVD
case was based on Powermach's rate, and thus the all-others companies
did not receive an export subsidy rate. Therefore, no offset to
Powermach's or the separate rate entities' cash deposit rates for
export subsidies is necessary. Additionally, we likewise are not
adjusting the cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity for
export subsidies.
Pursuant to 777A(f) of the Act, we are not adjusting preliminary
cash deposit rates for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through. Based
on the data on the record of this investigation, the Department does
not find a general decrease in the U.S. average import price during the
relevant period. Thus, the Department preliminarily finds that the
requirement under section 777A(f)(1)(B) of the Act has not been met,
and the Department did not make an adjustment under Section 777A(f) of
the Act.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the
preliminary determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case
briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after
the date on which the final verification report is issued in this
proceeding and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline
date for case briefs.\17\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2),
parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding
are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the
issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's
electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30
days after the date of publication of this notice.\18\ Hearing requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the issues parties intend to
present at the hearing. If a request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230, at a time and location to be determined. Parties should confirm
by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days
before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination by the Department, a request for
such postponement is made by exporters who account for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a
negative preliminary determination by the Department, a request for
such postponement is made by the petitioner. 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2)
requires that requests by respondents for postponement of a final
antidumping determination be accompanied by a request for extension of
provisional measures from a four-month period to a period not more than
six months in duration.
On May 5, 2016, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), Powermach
requested that the Department postpone its final determination, and
requested that the Department extend the application of the provisional
measures prescribed under section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(e)(2), from a four-month period to a period not to exceed six
months.\19\ On May 16, 2016, Petitioner requested that the Department
postpone the final determination in the event that the Department makes
a negative preliminary determination.\20\ Further, on May 17, 2016,
NVCC also requested that the Department postpone its final
determination and requested that the Department extend the application
of the provisional measures prescribed under section 733(d) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month period to a period not to
exceed six months.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Letter from Powermach to the Secretary of Commerce
``Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from the
People's Republic of China: Request for Extension of Final
Determination,'' dated May 5, 2016 (``Powermach Extension
Request'').
\20\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce
``Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from Canada and
the People's Republic of China: Petitioner's Request to Extend the
Final Determinations,'' dated May 16, 2016.
\21\ See Letter from NVCC to the Secretary of Commerce ``Iron
Mechanical Transfer Drive Components from the People's Republic of
China: Request to Postpone Final Determination,'' dated May 17,
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii) and (e)(2), because (1) our preliminary determination
is affirmative; (2) the requesting exporters account for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling
reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination and
extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period
not greater than six months. Accordingly, we will make our final
determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of
this preliminary determination, pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the
Act.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See 19 CFR 351.210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our affirmative preliminary determination of sales at LTFV.
Because the preliminary determination in this investigation is
[[Page 36880]]
affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act requires that the ITC make
its final determination whether the domestic industry in the United
States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports of IMTDC from the PRC before the later of 120 days
after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after our
final determination. Because we are postponing the deadline for our
final determination to 135 days from the date of publication of this
preliminary determination, as discussed above, the ITC will make its
final determination no later than 45 days after our final
determination.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum:
Summary
Background
Selection of Respondents
Period of Investigation
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Scope Comments
Scope of the Investigation
Product Characteristics
Discussion of the Methodology
Non-Market Economy Country
Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Comments
Separate Rates
Dumping Margin for the Separate Rate Companies
Combination Rates
The PRC-wide Entity
Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
Application of Partial AFA
Single Entity Treatment
Date of Sale
Fair Value Comparisons
U.S. Price
Normal Value
Factor Valuation Methodology
Verification
Export Subsidy Adjustment
International Trade Commission Notification
Conclusion
Appendix I: Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are iron mechanical
transfer drive components, whether finished or unfinished (i.e.,
blanks or castings). Subject iron mechanical transfer drive
components are in the form of wheels or cylinders with a center bore
hole that may have one or more grooves or teeth in their outer
circumference that guide or mesh with a flat or ribbed belt or like
device and are often referred to as sheaves, pulleys, flywheels,
flat pulleys, idlers, conveyer pulleys, synchronous sheaves, and
timing pulleys. The products covered by this investigation also
include bushings, which are iron mechanical transfer drive
components in the form of a cylinder and which fit into the bore
holes of other mechanical transfer drive components to lock them
into drive shafts by means of elements such as teeth, bolts, or
screws.
Iron mechanical transfer drive components subject to this
investigation are those not less than 4.00 inches (101 mm) in the
maximum nominal outer diameter.
Unfinished iron mechanical transfer drive components (i.e.,
blanks or castings) possess the approximate shape of the finished
iron mechanical transfer drive component and have not yet been
machined to final specification after the initial casting, forging
or like operations. These machining processes may include cutting,
punching, notching, boring, threading, mitering, or chamfering.
Subject merchandise includes iron mechanical transfer drive
components as defined above that have been finished or machined in a
third country, including but not limited to finishing/machining
processes such as cutting, punching, notching, boring, threading,
mitering, or chamfering, or any other processing that would not
otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation
if performed in the country of manufacture of the iron mechanical
transfer drive components.
Subject iron mechanical transfer drive components are covered by
the scope of the investigation regardless of width, design, or iron
type (e.g., gray, white, or ductile iron). Subject iron mechanical
transfer drive components are covered by the scope of the
investigation regardless of whether they have non-iron attachments
or parts and regardless of whether they are entered with other
mechanical transfer drive components or as part of a mechanical
transfer drive assembly (which typically includes one or more of the
iron mechanical transfer drive components identified above, and
which may also include other parts such as a belt, coupling and/or
shaft). When entered as a mechanical transfer drive assembly, only
the iron components that meet the physical description of covered
merchandise are covered merchandise, not the other components in the
mechanical transfer drive assembly (e.g., belt, coupling, shaft).
For purposes of this investigation, a covered product is of
``iron'' where the article has a carbon content of 1.7 percent by
weight or above, regardless of the presence and amount of additional
alloying elements.
Excluded from the scope are finished torsional vibration dampers
(TVDs). A finished TVD is an engine component composed of three
separate components: an inner ring, a rubber ring and an outer ring.
The inner ring is an iron wheel or cylinder with a bore hole to fit
a crank shaft which forms a seal to prevent leakage of oil from the
engine. The rubber ring is a dampening medium between the inner and
outer rings that effectively reduces the torsional vibration. The
outer ring, which may be made of materials other than iron, may or
may not have grooves in its outer circumference. To constitute a
finished excluded TVD, the product must be composed of each of the
three parts identified above and the three parts must be permanently
affixed to one another such that both the inner ring and the outer
ring are permanently affixed to the rubber ring. A finished TVD is
excluded only if it meets the physical description provided above;
merchandise that otherwise meets the description of the scope and
does not satisfy the physical description of excluded finished TVDs
above is still covered by the scope of the investigation regardless
of end use or identification as a TVD.
The scope also excludes light-duty, fixed-pitch, non-synchronous
sheaves (``excludable LDFPN sheaves'') with each of the following
characteristics: Made from grey iron designated as ASTM (North
American specification) Grade 30 or lower, GB/T (Chinese
specification) Grade HT200 or lower, DIN (German specification) GG
20 or lower, or EN (European specification) EN-GJL 200 or lower;
having no more than two grooves; having a maximum face width of no
more than 1.75 inches, where the face width is the width of the part
at its outside diameter; having a maximum outside diameter of not
more than 18.75 inches; and having no teeth on the outside or datum
diameter. Excludable LDFPN sheaves must also either have a maximum
straight bore size of 1.6875 inches with a maximum hub diameter of
2.875 inches; or else have a tapered bore measuring 1.625 inches at
the large end, a maximum hub diameter of 3.50 inches, a length
through tapered bore of 1.0 inches, exactly two tapped holes that
are 180 degrees apart, and a 2.0-inch bolt circle on the face of the
hub. Excludable LDFPN sheaves more than 6.75 inches in outside
diameter must also have an arm or spoke construction.\23\ Further,
excludable LDFPN sheaves must have a groove profile as indicated in
the table below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ An arm or spoke construction is where arms or spokes
(typically 3 to 6) connect the outside diameter of the sheave with
the hub of the sheave. This is in contrast to a block construction
(in which the material between the hub and the outside diameter is
solid with a uniform thickness that is the same thickness as the hub
of the sheave) or a web construction (in which the material between
the hub and the outside diameter is solid but is thinner than at the
hub of the sheave).
[[Page 36881]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top width
Outside diameter range of each Maximum height
Size (belt profile) (inches) groove (inches) Angle
(inches)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA/AK (A, 3L, 4L)..................... <=5.45.................. 0.484-0.499 0.531 34[deg]
MA/AK (A, 3L, 4L)..................... >5.45 but <=18.75....... 0.499-0.509 0.531 38[deg]
MB/BK (A, B, 4L, 5L).................. <=7.40.................. 0.607-0.618 0.632 34[deg]
MB/BK (A, B, 4L, 5L).................. >7.40 but <=18.75....... 0.620-0.631 0.635 38[deg]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the above characteristics, excludable LDFPN
sheaves must also have a maximum weight (pounds-per-piece) as
follows: For excludable LDFPN sheaves with one groove and an outside
diameter of greater than 4.0 inches but less than or equal to 8.0
inches, the maximum weight is 4.7 pounds; for excludable LDFPN
sheaves with two grooves and an outside diameter of greater than 4.0
inches but less than or equal to 8.0 inches, the maximum weight is
8.5 pounds; for excludable LDFPN sheaves with one groove and an
outside diameter of greater than 8.0 inches but less than or equal
to 12.0 inches, the maximum weight is 8.5 pounds; for excludable
LDFPN sheaves with two grooves and an outside diameter of greater
than 8.0 inches but less than or equal to 12.0 inches, the maximum
weight is 15.0 pounds; for excludable LDFPN sheaves with one groove
and an outside diameter of greater than 12.0 inches but less than or
equal to 15.0 inches, the maximum weight is 13.3 pounds; for
excludable LDFPN sheaves with two grooves and an outside diameter of
greater than 12.0 inches but less than or equal to 15.0 inches, the
maximum weight is 17.5 pounds; for excludable LDFPN sheaves with one
groove and an outside diameter of greater than 15.0 inches but less
than or equal to 18.75 inches, the maximum weight is 16.5 pounds;
and for excludable LDFPN sheaves with two grooves and an outside
diameter of greater than 15.0 inches but less than or equal to 18.75
inches, the maximum weight is 26.5 pounds.
The scope also excludes light-duty, variable-pitch, non-
synchronous sheaves with each of the following characteristics: Made
from grey iron designated as ASTM (North American specification)
Grade 30 or lower, GB/T (Chinese specification) Grade HT200 or
lower, DIN (German specification) GG 20 or lower, or EN (European
specification) EN-GJL 200 or lower; having no more than 2 grooves;
having a maximum overall width of less than 2.25 inches with a
single groove, or of 3.25 inches or less with two grooves; having a
maximum outside diameter of not more than 7.5 inches; having a
maximum bore size of 1.625 inches; having either one or two
identical, internally-threaded (i.e., with threads on the inside
diameter), adjustable (rotating) flange(s) on an externally-threaded
hub (i.e., with threads on the outside diameter) that enable(s) the
width (opening) of the groove to be changed; and having no teeth on
the outside or datum diameter.
The scope also excludes certain IMTDC bushings. An IMTDC bushing
is excluded only if it has a tapered angle of greater than or equal
to 10 degrees, where the angle is measured between one outside
tapered surface and the directly opposing outside tapered surface.
The merchandise covered by this investigation is currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'') subheadings 8483.30.8090, 8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040,
8483.50.9080, 8483.90.3000, 8483.90.8080. Covered merchandise may
also enter under the following HTSUS subheadings: 7325.10.0080,
7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010, 7326.19.0080, 8431.31.0040,
8431.31.0060, 8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000. These HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016-13533 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
