Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2009-2010, 36264-36265 [2016-13280]
Download as PDF
36264
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2016 / Notices
determination of this investigation is no
later than June 22, 2016.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–13278 Filed 6–3–16; 8:45 am]
On May 3, 2016, Titan Tire
Corporation and the United Steel, Paper
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union, AFL–CIO,
CLC (USW) (collectively, Petitioners)
made a timely request, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.205(e), for postponement of the
preliminary determination, in order to
provide the Department with sufficient
time to develop the record in this
proceeding through additional
questionnaires, which Petitioners will
in turn need to analyze and possibly
comment on. Because there are no
compelling reasons to deny Petitioners’
request, in accordance with section
773(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department
is postponing the deadline for the
preliminary determination by 50 days.
For the reasons stated above, the
Department, in accordance with section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing
the deadline for the preliminary
determination to no later than 190 days
after the date on which the Department
initiated this investigation. Therefore,
the new deadline for the preliminary
determination is August 11, 2016. In
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
Act, the deadline for the final
determination of this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of
the preliminary determination, unless
postponed at a later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–0410 or (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
[A–588–804, A–412–801]
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With
the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews; 2009–2010
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 10, 2016, the United
States Court of International Trade (the
Court) sustained the Final Remand
Redetermination pertaining to the
administrative reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on ball
bearings and parts thereof from Japan
and the United Kingdom covering the
period May 1, 2009, through April 30,
2010.1 Consistent with the decision of
the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken
Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) is notifying the public that
the Court’s final judgment in this case
is not in harmony with the Final
Results, and that the Department is
amending the Final Results with respect
to all respondents that were subject to
these administrative reviews.2
DATES: Effective May 20, 2016.
AGENCY:
On July 8, 2015, the Court remanded
the Final Results for the Department to
apply a differential pricing analysis.3
On remand, the Department applied a
differential pricing analysis, under
protest, and as a result, the weightedaverage dumping margin for each
respondent subject to these
administrative reviews changed. On
May 10, 2016, the Court upheld the
Final Remand Redetermination in full.4
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held
that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department must publish a notice of
a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
Remand Affirmation sustaining the
Final Remand Redetermination
constitutes a final decision of the Court
which is not in harmony with the Final
Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, the Department is amending
the Final Results with respect to all
respondents as follows:
Company
Rate (percent)
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
JAPAN
Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd. ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Audi AG ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Bosch Corporation ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Bosch Packaging Technology K.K. .....................................................................................................................................................
Bosch Rexroth Corporation .................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Japan Ltd. ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L. .............................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Group Services S.A. ..........................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Brazil Ltd. ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Africa Pty. Ltd. ....................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar of Australia Pty. Ltd. ...........................................................................................................................................................
1 See Final Results of Remand Redetermination
(Final Remand Redetermination) Pursuant to The
Timken Company v. United States, 79 F. Supp. 3d
1350 (CIT 2015) (Remand Order), aff’d The Timken
Company v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Jun 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
00155, slip op. 16–47, 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS
45 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 10, 2016) (Remand
Affirmation).
2 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan
and the United Kingdom: Final Results of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.33
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and
Rescission of Review in Part; 2009–2010, 79 FR
35312 (June 20, 2014) (Final Results).
3 See Remand Order, 79 F. Supp. 3d at 1361.
4 See Remand Affirmation at 26.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
36265
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2016 / Notices
Company
Rate (percent)
Caterpillar S.A.R.L. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Americas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. ................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Logistics Services China Ltd. .............................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ..........................................................................................................................................................
Hagglunds Ltd. .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Hino Motors Ltd. ..................................................................................................................................................................................
JTEKT Corporation (formerly known as Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.) ..........................................................................................................
Kongskilde Limited ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Mazda Motor Corporation ....................................................................................................................................................................
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation ................................................................................................................................................................
Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. ...............................................................................................................................................................
NSK Ltd. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation ..................................................................................................................................
Perkins Engines Company Limited .....................................................................................................................................................
Volkswagen AG ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Volkswagen Zubehor GmbH ...............................................................................................................................................................
Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation ................................................................................................................................................
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
0.65
4.58
4.58
2.79
6.37
4.58
4.58
4.58
4.58
UNITED KINGDOM
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alcatel Vacuum Technology ................................................................................................................................................................
Bosch Rexroth Ltd. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar S.A.R.L. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Group Services S.A. ..........................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar of Australia Pty Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L. .............................................................................................................................................................
Caterpillar Marine Power UK ...............................................................................................................................................................
NSK Bearings Europe Ltd. ..................................................................................................................................................................
Perkins Engines Company Ltd. ...........................................................................................................................................................
SKF (U.K.) Limited and SKF Aeroengine Bearings U.K. ....................................................................................................................
In the event the Court’s ruling is not
appealed, or if it is appealed and upheld
by the CAFC, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties on entries of the subject
merchandise exported by the companies
listed above. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), for Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.,
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK
Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN
Corporation and NTN Kongo
Corporation, we calculated importerspecific assessment rates by dividing the
total amount of dumping for the
reviewed sales by the total entered vale
of those reviewed sales for each
importer.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of reviews produced
by Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Mori Seiki Co.,
Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK Bearings Europe
Ltd., and NTN Corporation and NTN
Kongo Corporation, for which they did
not know their merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the country-specific all-others
rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
For all other companies listed above,
which were not selected for individual
examination, we will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties at a rate
equal to the weighted-average dumping
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Jun 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
margin listed above to all entries of
subject merchandise produced and/or
exported by such firms.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cash Deposit Requirements
[A–570–016]
Because we revoked the antidumping
duty orders on ball bearings and parts
thereof from Japan and the United
Kingdom effective September 15, 2011,
no cash deposits for estimated
antidumping duties on future entries of
subject merchandise will be required.5
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516(A)(e),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck
Tires From the People’s Republic of
China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review; 2015–2016
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–13280 Filed 6–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
5 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan
and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset
Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 25, 2016, the
Department received a timely request
for a new shipper review (NSR) from
Shandong Xinghongyuan Tire Co., Ltd.
(‘‘SXT’’), in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.214(c). The Department of
Commerce (Department) has determined
that the request for a NSR of the
antidumping duty order on Passenger
Vehicle and Light Truck Tires
(passenger tires) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) meets the
statutory and regulatory requirements
for initiation. The period of review
(POR) is August 1, 2015, through,
January 31, 2016.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36264-36265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13280]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-804, A-412-801]
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United
Kingdom: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2009-2010
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 10, 2016, the United States Court of International
Trade (the Court) sustained the Final Remand Redetermination pertaining
to the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball
bearings and parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom covering
the period May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010.\1\ Consistent with the
decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
(Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the
Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the public that
the Court's final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the
Final Results, and that the Department is amending the Final Results
with respect to all respondents that were subject to these
administrative reviews.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Final Results of Remand Redetermination (Final Remand
Redetermination) Pursuant to The Timken Company v. United States, 79
F. Supp. 3d 1350 (CIT 2015) (Remand Order), aff'd The Timken Company
v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14-00155, slip op. 16-47, 2016
Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 45 (Ct. Int'l Trade May 10, 2016) (Remand
Affirmation).
\2\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the
United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews and Rescission of Review in Part; 2009-2010, 79 FR 35312
(June 20, 2014) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective May 20, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0410 or (202) 482-1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 8, 2015, the Court remanded the Final Results for the
Department to apply a differential pricing analysis.\3\ On remand, the
Department applied a differential pricing analysis, under protest, and
as a result, the weighted-average dumping margin for each respondent
subject to these administrative reviews changed. On May 10, 2016, the
Court upheld the Final Remand Redetermination in full.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Remand Order, 79 F. Supp. 3d at 1361.
\4\ See Remand Affirmation at 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the
CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), the Department must publish a notice of a court
decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court
decision. The Remand Affirmation sustaining the Final Remand
Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the Court which is not
in harmony with the Final Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court decision, the Department is
amending the Final Results with respect to all respondents as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company Rate (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JAPAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.................................... 1.33
Audi AG................................................. 4.58
Bosch Corporation....................................... 4.58
Bosch Packaging Technology K.K.......................... 4.58
Bosch Rexroth Corporation............................... 4.58
Caterpillar Japan Ltd................................... 4.58
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L............................ 4.58
Caterpillar Group Services S.A.......................... 4.58
Caterpillar Brazil Ltd.................................. 4.58
Caterpillar Africa Pty. Ltd............................. 4.58
Caterpillar of Australia Pty. Ltd....................... 4.58
[[Page 36265]]
Caterpillar S.A.R.L..................................... 4.58
Caterpillar Americas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.......... 4.58
Caterpillar Logistics Services China Ltd................ 4.58
Caterpillar Mexico, S.A. de C.V......................... 4.58
Hagglunds Ltd........................................... 4.58
Hino Motors Ltd......................................... 4.58
JTEKT Corporation (formerly known as Koyo Seiko Co., 4.58
Ltd.)..................................................
Kongskilde Limited...................................... 4.58
Mazda Motor Corporation................................. 4.58
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd..................................... 0.65
Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation............................. 4.58
Nissan Motor Company, Ltd............................... 4.58
NSK Ltd................................................. 2.79
NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation............... 6.37
Perkins Engines Company Limited......................... 4.58
Volkswagen AG........................................... 4.58
Volkswagen Zubehor GmbH................................. 4.58
Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation...................... 4.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED KINGDOM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alcatel Vacuum Technology............................... 6.47
Bosch Rexroth Ltd....................................... 6.47
Caterpillar S.A.R.L..................................... 6.47
Caterpillar Group Services S.A.......................... 6.47
Caterpillar of Australia Pty Ltd........................ 6.47
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L............................ 6.47
Caterpillar Marine Power UK............................. 6.47
NSK Bearings Europe Ltd................................. 6.47
Perkins Engines Company Ltd............................. 6.47
SKF (U.K.) Limited and SKF Aeroengine Bearings U.K...... 6.47
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed, or if it is
appealed and upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on
entries of the subject merchandise exported by the companies listed
above. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Asahi Seiko Co.,
Ltd., Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN
Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation, we calculated importer-specific
assessment rates by dividing the total amount of dumping for the
reviewed sales by the total entered vale of those reviewed sales for
each importer.
For entries of subject merchandise during the period of reviews
produced by Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK
Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation,
for which they did not know their merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at
the country-specific all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
For all other companies listed above, which were not selected for
individual examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties at a rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin listed
above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by
such firms.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because we revoked the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and
parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom effective September 15,
2011, no cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties on future
entries of subject merchandise will be required.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the
United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516(A)(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-13280 Filed 6-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P