Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 900.1, 910, and 921, 35074-35075 [2016-12778]
Download as PDF
35074
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Notices
BY: lllllllllllllllllll
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC
BY: lllllllllllllllllll
NYSE ARCA, INC.
BY: lllllllllllllllllll
NYSE MKT LLC
BY: lllllllllllllllllll
[TOPAZ EXCHANGE, LLC
BY: lllllllllllllllll]
[FR Doc. 2016–12779 Filed 5–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77916; File No. SR–Phlx–
2016–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rules 900.1, 910, and 921
May 25, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on May 12,
2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange proposes to amend the
following Rules: 900.1, General Powers
and Duties of Membership Department;
910, Qualifications [sic] as Member
Organization; and 921, Qualifications
[sic]; Designation of Executive
Representative.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:59 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify
certain Phlx membership rules in order
to harmonize them with Nasdaq and BX
rules and to modernize the Exchange’s
Rulebook. Specifically, Exchange
proposes to amend Rule 900.1 entitled,
‘‘General Powers and Duties of
Membership Department’’ by
eliminating sections (b) and (d) which
are the provisions regarding
partnerships as distinct membership
classifications. The exchange also
proposes to eliminate the provisions
regarding partnerships from Rule 910(j),
Qualifications [sic] as Member
Organization. The Exchange will reserve
those sections of the rules in order to
allow for future membership needs.
Sections of each of these Rules were
more relevant to the Phlx membership
review process prior to demutualization
in 2004 and specifically related to the
review of partnerships and no longer
reflect the information needed as part of
the membership review. These
provisions were retained following
changes to the Exchange Bylaws in
2009, yet no longer were relevant to the
regulatory needs of the Exchange. The
proposed changes related to ownership
structures of partnerships that the
Exchange no longer needs as discussed
in greater detail below. An additional
amendment relates to the organizational
changes that occurred following
demutualization such that
responsibilities that formerly were
handled by the Board of Directors are
now a responsibility of the Membership
Department. The final change to Rule
921 entitled, ‘‘Qualification; Designation
of Executive Representative’’ is
proposed to align Phlx rules with
existing NASDAQ and BX rule 1150.
The membership distinctions in Rule
900.1(b) and (d) and Rule 910(j) were
applicable when Phlx offered seats to its
members, prior to demutualization, yet
remained in the rules after this was
concluded in 2004. Before
demutualization, Phlx seats conveyed
ownership of the Exchange, in addition
to access, which created a greater
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
obligation on Phlx to gather information
on the members’ legal business
structure. Specifically, Phlx was
obligated to maintain a heighted
vigilance on the structure, ownership,
and change of control in a partnership
in order to ensure the financial integrity
of its ownership and members ability to
honor their trades and obligations. Rule
900.1(b) and 900.1(d) articulates
obligations of partners and general
partners as they relate to the Exchange
that are no longer relevant as the
partnership no longer conveys specific
obligations that are distinct from any
other member organization. Rule 910(j)
relates to liabilities that were unique to
the partnership, as a member, which are
no longer applicable today.
Today, permits are issued to Exchange
members and member organizations.
The Exchange no longer needs to
differentiate among types of entities
because the permit structure conveys no
ownership to the member. These
membership rules related to
partnerships are no longer applicable
today. The distinctions regarding the
admission of a member or member
organization as a partnership, as
compared to another ownership
structure, are no longer relevant.
The Exchange also proposes to
replace the references to the ‘‘Board of
Directors’’ with the ‘‘Membership
Department’’ as part of Rule 910(h). The
responsibilities of the Board of Directors
have changed. Consequently, the Board
of Directors is no longer actively
involved in the membership process,
which is now operated in the same way
as Nasdaq’s and BX’s and the review of
the qualifications of Member
Organizations is handled by the
Membership Department, as defined in
Rule 1(p). This rule has become
outdated and no longer reflects current
business practices.
The final change relates to Rule
921(b); Phlx seeks to harmonize 921(b)
with the existing Nasdaq and BX Rule
1150 by not requiring an executive
representative to provide evidence of
their acceptance of designation in
writing. The membership form will
continue to require the designation of
the Executive Representative, but will
no longer require the designated person
to provide their signature. The
elimination of the evidence of
acceptance provision of 921(b) does not
impose any burden on competition
rather it aligns the requirements of
PHLX with that of Nasdaq and BX.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Notices
of the Act 3 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 4
in particular, in that it is designed to
protect investors and the public interest
by streamlining various aspects of the
membership process. The Exchange
believes that the provisions identified in
Rule 900.1, 910, and 921 are outdated
and unnecessary. These rules regarding
partnerships and changes to the
partnership rules no longer serves the
needs of the Exchange.
As described above PHLX’s former
ownership required the Exchange to be
vigilant of the ownership structure of its
members in case of financial distress or
bankruptcy as the seat structure was
vital to the financial condition of the
Exchange and the relationships among
members. Before demutualization,
members had an ownership interest in
the Exchange. Today, permits convey no
ownership and therefore such vigilance
as to the ownership structure of
members is no longer warranted.
The removal of Rules 900.1(b) and (d),
Rule 910(j) and part of 921(b) will
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities by
removing burdensome requirements so
that members and member organizations
may properly focus on other relevant
requirements which benefit the
marketplace.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange’s proposed amendments
seek to delete certain unnecessary rules
which today burden partnerships over
corporations. The deletions of the Rules
900.1(b) and (d), Rule 910(j) will remove
a current burden on competition which
requires members and member
organizations that are partnerships to
disclose unnecessary information as
compared to other corporate entities not
structured as a partnership.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
3 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:59 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 5 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.6
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2016–38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2016–38. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
5 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii) [sic].
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
6 17
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35075
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2016–38 and should be submitted on or
before June 22, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–12778 Filed 5–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77906; File No. SR–
BatsEDGA–2016–10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats
EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change to Rule 11.7,
Opening Process
May 25, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 13,
2016, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35074-35075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12778]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-77916; File No. SR-Phlx-2016-38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules
900.1, 910, and 921
May 25, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on May 12, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the following Rules: 900.1, General
Powers and Duties of Membership Department; 910, Qualifications [sic]
as Member Organization; and 921, Qualifications [sic]; Designation of
Executive Representative.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify certain Phlx membership rules in
order to harmonize them with Nasdaq and BX rules and to modernize the
Exchange's Rulebook. Specifically, Exchange proposes to amend Rule
900.1 entitled, ``General Powers and Duties of Membership Department''
by eliminating sections (b) and (d) which are the provisions regarding
partnerships as distinct membership classifications. The exchange also
proposes to eliminate the provisions regarding partnerships from Rule
910(j), Qualifications [sic] as Member Organization. The Exchange will
reserve those sections of the rules in order to allow for future
membership needs. Sections of each of these Rules were more relevant to
the Phlx membership review process prior to demutualization in 2004 and
specifically related to the review of partnerships and no longer
reflect the information needed as part of the membership review. These
provisions were retained following changes to the Exchange Bylaws in
2009, yet no longer were relevant to the regulatory needs of the
Exchange. The proposed changes related to ownership structures of
partnerships that the Exchange no longer needs as discussed in greater
detail below. An additional amendment relates to the organizational
changes that occurred following demutualization such that
responsibilities that formerly were handled by the Board of Directors
are now a responsibility of the Membership Department. The final change
to Rule 921 entitled, ``Qualification; Designation of Executive
Representative'' is proposed to align Phlx rules with existing NASDAQ
and BX rule 1150.
The membership distinctions in Rule 900.1(b) and (d) and Rule
910(j) were applicable when Phlx offered seats to its members, prior to
demutualization, yet remained in the rules after this was concluded in
2004. Before demutualization, Phlx seats conveyed ownership of the
Exchange, in addition to access, which created a greater obligation on
Phlx to gather information on the members' legal business structure.
Specifically, Phlx was obligated to maintain a heighted vigilance on
the structure, ownership, and change of control in a partnership in
order to ensure the financial integrity of its ownership and members
ability to honor their trades and obligations. Rule 900.1(b) and
900.1(d) articulates obligations of partners and general partners as
they relate to the Exchange that are no longer relevant as the
partnership no longer conveys specific obligations that are distinct
from any other member organization. Rule 910(j) relates to liabilities
that were unique to the partnership, as a member, which are no longer
applicable today.
Today, permits are issued to Exchange members and member
organizations. The Exchange no longer needs to differentiate among
types of entities because the permit structure conveys no ownership to
the member. These membership rules related to partnerships are no
longer applicable today. The distinctions regarding the admission of a
member or member organization as a partnership, as compared to another
ownership structure, are no longer relevant.
The Exchange also proposes to replace the references to the ``Board
of Directors'' with the ``Membership Department'' as part of Rule
910(h). The responsibilities of the Board of Directors have changed.
Consequently, the Board of Directors is no longer actively involved in
the membership process, which is now operated in the same way as
Nasdaq's and BX's and the review of the qualifications of Member
Organizations is handled by the Membership Department, as defined in
Rule 1(p). This rule has become outdated and no longer reflects current
business practices.
The final change relates to Rule 921(b); Phlx seeks to harmonize
921(b) with the existing Nasdaq and BX Rule 1150 by not requiring an
executive representative to provide evidence of their acceptance of
designation in writing. The membership form will continue to require
the designation of the Executive Representative, but will no longer
require the designated person to provide their signature. The
elimination of the evidence of acceptance provision of 921(b) does not
impose any burden on competition rather it aligns the requirements of
PHLX with that of Nasdaq and BX.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)
[[Page 35075]]
of the Act \3\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \4\ in particular, in that it is designed to protect
investors and the public interest by streamlining various aspects of
the membership process. The Exchange believes that the provisions
identified in Rule 900.1, 910, and 921 are outdated and unnecessary.
These rules regarding partnerships and changes to the partnership rules
no longer serves the needs of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above PHLX's former ownership required the Exchange to
be vigilant of the ownership structure of its members in case of
financial distress or bankruptcy as the seat structure was vital to the
financial condition of the Exchange and the relationships among
members. Before demutualization, members had an ownership interest in
the Exchange. Today, permits convey no ownership and therefore such
vigilance as to the ownership structure of members is no longer
warranted.
The removal of Rules 900.1(b) and (d), Rule 910(j) and part of
921(b) will promote just and equitable principles of trade, and foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities by removing burdensome requirements so that
members and member organizations may properly focus on other relevant
requirements which benefit the marketplace.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The Exchange's proposed amendments seek to delete certain
unnecessary rules which today burden partnerships over corporations.
The deletions of the Rules 900.1(b) and (d), Rule 910(j) will remove a
current burden on competition which requires members and member
organizations that are partnerships to disclose unnecessary information
as compared to other corporate entities not structured as a
partnership.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \5\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii) [sic].
\6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2016-38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2016-38. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2016-38 and should be
submitted on or before June 22, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12778 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P