Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware From China; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review, 32345-32346 [2016-12024]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Notices
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Docket Services, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–1802.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2015).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
May 17, 2016, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States or the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain air mattress bed systems and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
5, 6, 16, 19, 20, 22, 24, and 26 of the
’554 patent and claims 1, 3–6, 10, 14,
and 24 of the ’848 patent, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Select Comfort Corporation, 9800 59th
Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN
55442
Select Comfort SC Corporation, 103
Shaw Street, Greenville, SC 29609
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
American National Manufacturing Inc.,
252 Mariah Circle, Corona, CA 92879
Elements of Rest Inc., 1000 Marietta
Street, Suite 106, Atlanta, GA 30318
Responsive Surface Technology LLC,
1000 Marietta Street, Suite 106,
Atlanta, GA 30318
Dires LLC d/b/a Personal Comfort Bed,
3411 Lake Breeze Drive, Building 601,
Suite E/F, Orlando, FL 32808
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 May 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 18, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–12074 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–298 (Fourth
Review)]
Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware
From China; Scheduling of an
Expedited Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on porcelain-on-steel cooking
ware from China would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective May 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keysha Martinez (202–205–2136), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32345
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 6, 2016, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (81
FR 5133, February 1, 2016) of the
subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on June
2, 2016, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the response
submitted by Columbian Home Products, LLC to be
individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
32346
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Notices
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before June 7,
2016 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by June 7, 2016.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules with
respect to filing were revised effective
July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25,
2014), and the revised Commission
Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 17, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–12024 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1071 (Second
Review)]
Alloy Magnesium From China;
Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year
Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 May 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on alloy magnesium from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: May 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Petronzio ((202) 205–3176),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 6, 2016, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (81
FR 5136, February 1, 2016) of the
subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)).2
For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on June
2, 2016, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before June 7,
2016 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by June 7, 2016.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules with
respect to filing were revised effective
July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25,
2014), and the revised Commission
Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Vice Chairman Dean A. Pinkert did not
participate in the adequacy determination.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by US Magnesium and The United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy,
Allied Industrial and Service Workers International
Union, Local 8319 to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 17, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–12021 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32345-32346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12024]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-298 (Fourth Review)]
Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware From China; Scheduling of an
Expedited Five-Year Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on
porcelain-on-steel cooking ware from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keysha Martinez (202-205-2136), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On May 6, 2016, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(81 FR 5133, February 1, 2016) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to
section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information concerning the conduct of this review and
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
June 2, 2016, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the
[[Page 32346]]
Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before
June 7, 2016 and may not contain new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party
may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new
factual information) pertinent to the review by June 7, 2016. However,
should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce's
final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce's
results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI),
they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and
207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules with respect to
filing were revised effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25,
2014), and the revised Commission Handbook on E-filing, available from
the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the response submitted by Columbian
Home Products, LLC to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 17, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-12024 Filed 5-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P