Nationwide Mutual Funds, et al.; Notice of Application, 31988-31993 [2016-11873]
Download as PDF
31988
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
MAMMs to direct their order flow to the
Exchange, which would increase orders
routed to the Exchange and benefit all
market participants by expanding
liquidity, providing more trading
opportunities and tighter spreads,
including those market participants that
opt not to become a MAMM and
therefore may be ineligible to earn the
credits under the MVP.
The proposal is also reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
would only process one designation of
a MOFP and MAMM every 6 months,
which requirement would impose a
measure of exclusivity while allowing
MAMM’s to rely upon, and potentially
increase, the MOFP’s transaction
volume executed on the Exchange to the
benefit of all Exchange participants.
Finally, the Exchange believes the
proposal is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory as it may
encourage an increase in orders routed
to the Exchange, which would expand
liquidity and provide more trading
opportunities and tighter spreads to the
benefit of all market participants.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,22 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. To the
contrary, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will increase
competition by allowing smaller Market
Makers to compete for more favorable
fees and rebates. As currently
implemented, Market Makers that are
affiliated with an order router are
advantaged relative to other firms in
achieving volume based fees and
rebates. Although the Exchange
continues to believe that counting
volume across affiliated members is
appropriate, a Market Maker that has a
similar relationship, without common
ownership, should be able to compete
for and receive similar benefits. The
proposed rule change is designed to
level the playing field between these
members and their competitors that
already benefit from affiliated volume.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct their
order flow to competing venues. For the
reasons described above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed fee change
reflects this competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,23 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder,24 because it establishes a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by ISE
Mercury.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISEMercury–2016–11 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISEMercury–2016–11. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
23
22
15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
24
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
ISEMercury–2016–11, and should be
submitted on or before June 10, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–11881 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
32115; File No. 812–14573]
Nationwide Mutual Funds, et al.; Notice
of Application
May 16, 2016.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application for an
order pursuant to section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
(‘‘Act’’) granting an exemption from
sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act;
pursuant to section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
granting an exemption from section
12(d)(1) of the Act; pursuant to sections
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and
rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
AGENCY:
25
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION:
Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered open-end
management investment companies to
participate in a joint lending and
borrowing facility.
APPLICANTS: Nationwide Mutual Funds
(‘‘NMF’’), and Nationwide Variable
Insurance Trust (‘‘NVIT,’’ and together
with NMF, each a ‘‘Trust,’’ and together,
the ‘‘Trusts’’) and Nationwide Fund
Advisors (the ‘‘Initial Adviser’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on October 29, 2015, and amended on
April 6, 2016.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on June 10, 2016, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090;
Applicants: 1000 Continental Drive,
Suite 400, King of Prussia, PA 19406.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill
Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–
6819 or David J. Marcinkus, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each of NMF and NVIT is
organized as a Delaware statutory trust.
Each Trust consists of multiple series
(each series, a ‘‘Fund,’’ and together, the
‘‘Funds’’). One series of NMF, the
Nationwide Money Market Fund, and
one series of NVIT, the NVIT Money
Market Fund, operate as money market
funds in reliance on rule 2a–7 under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Act. (The Nationwide Money Market
Fund, the NVIT Money Market Fund,
and any future Funds that rely on rule
2a–7 are the ‘‘Money Market Funds.’’)
The Funds are registered with the
Commission as open-end management
investment companies. The Initial
Adviser, a Delaware business trust,
serves as investment adviser to the
Funds, and is registered as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’).1
2. At any particular time, while some
Funds enter into repurchase agreements,
or invest their cash balances in money
market funds or other short-term
instruments, other Funds may need to
borrow money for temporary purposes
to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a
trade ‘‘fail’’ in which cash payment for
a security sold by a Fund has been
delayed, or for other temporary
purposes. The Trusts currently are
parties to a senior unsecured committed
credit facility (as amended, modified,
refinanced or replaced from time to
time, the ‘‘Loan Agreement’’) that
provides a line of credit to the
participating Funds, and is furnished by
a syndicate of banks, including the
Funds’ custodian.
3. Applicants state that, generally,
when a Fund borrows money under the
Loan Agreement, it pays interest on the
loan at a rate that is typically higher
than the rate that is earned by other
(non-borrowing) Funds on investments
in repurchase agreements, money
market funds, and other short-term
instruments of the same maturity as the
bank loan. Applicants assert that this
differential represents the profit earned
by the lender on loans and is not
attributable to any material difference in
the credit quality or risk of such
transactions.
4. The Trusts seek to enter into master
interfund lending agreements
1 Applicants request that the relief also apply to
any other open-end registered management
investment company advised by the Initial Adviser
or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Initial Adviser (such
entity included in the term ‘‘Adviser’’) that
currently, or in the future, is part of the same
‘‘group of investment companies’’ as the Trusts, as
defined in section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act
(included in the term ‘‘Trusts’’). All entities that
currently intend to rely on the requested order have
been named as applicants. Any other entity that
relies on the requested order in the future will
comply with the terms and conditions set forth in
the application. Any other Adviser will be
registered as an investment adviser under the
Advisers Act. All references to the term ‘‘Adviser’’
herein include successors-in-interest to the Adviser.
Successors-in-interest are limited to any entity
resulting from a reorganization of the Adviser into
another jurisdiction or a change in the type of
business organization.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31989
(‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’) with
each other on behalf of the Funds that
would permit each Fund to lend money
directly to and borrow directly from
other Funds through a credit facility for
temporary purposes (an ‘‘Interfund
Loan’’). The Money Market Funds will
not participate as borrowers in the
interfund lending facility. Applicants
state that the proposed credit facility is
expected to both reduce the Funds’
potential borrowing costs and enhance
the ability of the lending Funds to earn
higher rates of interest on their shortterm lendings. Although the proposed
credit facility would reduce the Funds’
need to borrow from banks, the Funds
would be free to establish and maintain
committed lines of credit or other
borrowing arrangements with
unaffiliated banks.
5. Applicants anticipate that the
proposed credit facility would provide a
borrowing Fund with savings at times
when the cash position of the borrowing
Fund is insufficient to meet temporary
cash requirements. This situation could
arise when shareholder redemptions
exceed anticipated volumes and certain
Funds have insufficient cash on hand to
satisfy such redemptions. When the
Funds liquidate portfolio securities to
meet redemption requests, they often do
not receive payment in settlement for up
to three days (or longer for certain
foreign transactions). However,
redemption requests normally are
effected immediately. The proposed
credit facility would provide a source of
immediate, short-term liquidity pending
settlement of the sale of portfolio
securities.
6. Applicants also anticipate that a
Fund could use the proposed credit
facility when a sale of securities ‘‘fails’’
due to circumstances beyond the Fund’s
control, such as a delay in the delivery
of cash to the Fund’s custodian or
improper delivery instructions by the
broker effecting the transaction. ‘‘Sales
fails’’ may present a cash shortfall if the
Fund has undertaken to purchase a
security using the proceeds from
securities sold. Alternatively, the Fund
could ‘‘fail’’ on its intended purchase
due to lack of funds from the previous
sale, resulting in additional cost to the
Fund. Use of the proposed credit facility
under these circumstances would
enable the Fund to have access to
immediate short-term liquidity.
7. While bank borrowings generally
could supply needed cash to cover
unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, under the proposed credit facility,
a borrowing Fund would pay lower
interest rates than those that would be
payable under short-term loans offered
by banks. In addition, Funds making
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
31990
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
short-term cash loans directly to other
Funds would earn interest at a rate
higher than they otherwise could obtain
from investing their cash in repurchase
agreements or money market funds.
Thus, applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility would benefit
both borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate to be charged to
the Funds on any Interfund Loan (the
‘‘Interfund Loan Rate’’) would be the
average of the ‘‘Repo Rate’’ and the
‘‘Bank Loan Rate,’’ both as defined
below. The Repo Rate for any day would
be the highest or best (after giving effect
to factors such as the credit quality of
the counterparty) rate available to a
lending Fund from investment in
overnight repurchase agreements with
counterparties approved by the Fund or
its Adviser. The Bank Loan Rate for any
day would be calculated by the
Interfund Lending Committee, as
defined below, each day an Interfund
Loan is made according to a formula
established by each Fund’s board of
trustees (the ‘‘Trustees’’) intended to
approximate the lowest interest rate at
which bank short-term loans would be
available to the Funds. The formula
would be based upon a publicly
available rate (e.g., federal funds plus 25
basis points) and would vary with this
rate so as to reflect changing bank loan
rates. The initial formula and any
subsequent modifications to the formula
would be subject to the approval of each
Fund’s Trustees. In addition, each
Fund’s Trustees would periodically
review the continuing appropriateness
of using the formula to determine the
Bank Loan Rate, as well as the
relationship between the Bank Loan
Rate and current bank loan rates that
would be available to the Funds.
9. Certain members of the Adviser’s
fund administration personnel and
money market analysts (the ‘‘Interfund
Lending Committee’’) will administer
the credit facility. No portfolio manager
of any Fund will serve as a member of
the Interfund Lending Committee. On
any day on which a Fund intends to
borrow money, the Interfund Lending
Committee would make an Interfund
Loan from a lending Fund to a
borrowing Fund only if the Interfund
Loan Rate is: (i) More favorable to the
lending Fund than the Repo Rate and,
if applicable, the yield of any money
market fund in which the lending Fund
could otherwise invest, and (ii) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than
the Bank Loan Rate.
10. Under the proposed credit facility,
the portfolio managers for each
participating Fund could provide
standing instructions to participate
daily as a borrower or lender;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
alternatively, the portfolio manager
could provide instructions from time to
time as to when the Fund wishes to
participate as a borrower or lender. The
Interfund Lending Committee on each
business day would collect data on the
uninvested cash and borrowing
requirements of all participating Funds.
Once it had determined the aggregate
amount of cash available for loans and
borrowing demand, the Interfund
Lending Committee would allocate
loans among borrowing Funds without
any further communication from the
portfolio managers of the Funds.
Applicants anticipate that there
typically will be far more available
uninvested cash each day than
borrowing demand. Therefore, after the
Interfund Lending Committee has
allocated cash for Interfund Loans, the
Interfund Lending Committee will
invest any remaining cash in accordance
with the standing instructions of the
portfolio managers or such remaining
amounts will be invested directly by the
portfolio managers of the Funds.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee
would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the
Funds on what the Interfund Lending
Committee believes to be an equitable
basis, subject to certain administrative
procedures applicable to all Funds, such
as the time of filing requests to
participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and
the need to minimize the number of
transactions and associated
administrative costs. To reduce
transaction costs, each loan normally
would be allocated in a manner
intended to minimize the number of
participants necessary to complete the
loan transaction. The method of
allocation and related administrative
procedures would be approved by each
Fund’s Trustees, including a majority of
Trustees who are not ‘‘interested
persons’’ of the Fund, as that term is
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act
(‘‘Independent Trustees’’), to ensure that
both borrowing and lending Funds
participate on an equitable basis.
12. The Adviser would: (a) Monitor
the Interfund Loan Rate and the other
terms and conditions of the loans; (b)
limit the borrowings and loans entered
into by each Fund to ensure that they
comply with the Fund’s investment
policies and limitations; (c) ensure
equitable treatment of each Fund; and
(d) make quarterly reports to the
Trustees concerning any transactions by
the Funds under the proposed credit
facility and the Interfund Loan Rate
charged.
13. The Adviser, through the
Interfund Lending Committee, would
administer the proposed credit facility
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its
duties under the investment advisory
agreement and administrative
agreements with each Fund and would
receive no additional fee as
compensation for its services in
connection with the administration of
the proposed credit facility. The Adviser
may collect standard pricing, record
keeping, bookkeeping and accounting
fees associated with the transfer of cash
and/or securities in connection with
repurchase and lending transactions
generally, including transactions
effected through the proposed credit
facility. Such fees would be no higher
than those applicable for comparable
bank loan transactions.
14. No Fund may participate in the
proposed credit facility unless: (a) The
Fund has obtained shareholder approval
for its participation, if such approval is
required by law; (b) the Fund has fully
disclosed all material information
concerning the credit facility in its
prospectus and/or statement of
additional information; and (c) the
Fund’s participation in the credit
facility is consistent with its investment
objectives and limitations and
organizational documents.
15. As part of the Trustees’ review of
the continuing appropriateness of a
Fund’s participation in the proposed
credit facility as required by condition
14, the Trustees of the Fund, including
a majority of the Independent Trustees,
also will review the process in place to
appropriately assess: (i) If the Fund
participates as a lender, any effect its
participation may have on the Fund’s
liquidity risk; and (ii) if the Fund
participates as a borrower, whether the
Fund’s portfolio liquidity is sufficient to
satisfy its obligations under the facility
along with its other liquidity needs.
16. In connection with the credit
facility, applicants request an order
under section 6(c) of the Act exempting
them from the provisions of sections
18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act exempting them
from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act
exempting them from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
under section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act to permit certain
joint arrangements.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally
prohibits any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from borrowing money or other property
from the registered investment
company. Section 21(b) of the Act
generally prohibits any registered
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
management company from lending
money or other property to any person,
directly or indirectly, if that person
controls or is under common control
with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of
the Act defines an ‘‘affiliated person’’ of
another person, in part, to be any person
directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9)
of the Act defines ‘‘control’’ as the
‘‘power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a company,’’ but excludes
circumstances in which ‘‘such power is
solely the result of an official position
with such company.’’ Applicants state
that the Funds may be under common
control by virtue of having common
investment advisers and/or by having
common Trustees and officers.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
an exemptive order may be granted
where an exemption is ‘‘necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
[the Act].’’ Section 17(b) of the Act
authorizes the Commission to exempt a
proposed transaction from section 17(a)
provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration
to be paid or received, are fair and
reasonable and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and the transaction is
consistent with the policy of the
investment company as recited in its
registration statement and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants
believe that the proposed arrangements
satisfy these standards for the reasons
discussed below.
3. Applicants assert that sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act were
intended to prevent a party with strong
potential adverse interests to, and some
influence over the investment decisions
of, a registered investment company
from causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending
transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of such party and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do
not raise these concerns because: (a) The
Adviser, through the Interfund Lending
Committee, would administer the
program as a disinterested fiduciary as
part of its duties under the investment
advisory agreement and administrative
agreements with each Fund; (b) all
Interfund Loans would consist only of
uninvested cash reserves that the
lending Fund otherwise would invest in
short-term repurchase agreements or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
other short-term instruments either
directly or through a money market
fund; (c) the Interfund Loans would not
involve a significantly greater risk than
such other investments; (d) the lending
Fund would receive interest at a rate
higher than it could otherwise obtain
through such other investments; and (e)
the borrowing Fund would pay interest
at a rate lower than otherwise available
to it under its bank loan agreements and
avoid some up-front commitment fees
associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, applicants assert that
the other terms and conditions that
applicants propose also would
effectively preclude the possibility of
any Fund obtaining an undue advantage
over any other Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits an affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or any
affiliated person of such a person, from
selling securities or other property to
the investment company. Section
17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an
affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, from
purchasing securities or other property
from the investment company. Section
12(d)(1) of the Act generally prohibits a
registered investment company from
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any
security issued by any other investment
company except in accordance with the
limitations set forth in that section.
5. Applicants state that the obligation
of a borrowing Fund to repay an
Interfund Loan could be deemed to
constitute a security for the purposes of
sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1).
Applicants also state that any pledge of
assets in connection with an Interfund
Loan could be construed as a purchase
of the borrowing Fund’s securities or
other property for purposes of section
17(a)(2) of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act provides that the Commission
may exempt persons or transactions
from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if
and to the extent that such exemption
is consistent with the public interest
and the protection of investors.
Applicants submit that the requested
exemptions from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2) and 12(d)(1) are appropriate in
the public interest, and consistent with
the protection of investors and policies
and purposes of the Act for all the
reasons set forth above in support of
their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b). Applicants also state
that the requested relief from section
17(a)(2) of the Act meets the standards
of section 6(c) and 17(b) because any
collateral pledged to secure an Interfund
Loan would be subject to the same
conditions imposed by any other lender
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31991
to a Fund that imposes conditions on
the quality of or access to collateral for
a borrowing (if the lender is another
Fund) or the same or better conditions
(in any other circumstance).
6. Applicants state that section
12(d)(1) was intended to prevent the
pyramiding of investment companies in
order to avoid imposing on investors
additional and duplicative costs and
fees attendant upon multiple layers of
investments. Applicants submit that the
proposed credit facility does not involve
these abuses. Applicants note that there
will be no duplicative costs or fees to
the Funds or their shareholders, and
that the Adviser will receive no
additional compensation for its services
in administering the credit facility.
Applicants also note that the purpose of
the proposed credit facility is to provide
economic benefits for all the
participating Funds and their
shareholders.
7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits
open-end investment companies from
issuing any senior security except that
a company is permitted to borrow from
any bank, provided, that immediately
after the borrowing, there is asset
coverage of at least 300 per centum for
all borrowings of the company. Under
section 18(g) of the Act, the term ‘‘senior
security’’ generally includes any bond,
debenture, note or similar obligation or
instrument constituting a security and
evidencing indebtedness. Applicants
request exemptive relief under section
6(c) from section 18(f)(1) only to the
limited extent necessary to permit a
Fund to lend to or borrow directly from
other Funds. The Funds would remain
subject to the requirement of section
18(f)(l) that all borrowings of a Fund,
including combined interfund and bank
borrowings, have at least 300% asset
coverage. Based on the conditions and
safeguards described in the application,
applicants submit that to allow the
Funds to borrow directly from other
Funds pursuant to the proposed credit
facility is consistent with the purposes
and policies of section 18(f)(l).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act generally prohibit
an affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, when acting as
principal, from effecting any joint
transaction in which the investment
company participates, unless, upon
application, the transaction has been
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d–
1(b) under the Act provides that in
passing upon an application filed under
the rule, the Commission will consider
whether the participation of the
registered investment company in a
joint enterprise on the basis proposed is
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
31992
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
consistent with the provisions, policies
and purposes of the Act and the extent
to which such participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than
that of the other participants.
9. Applicants assert that the purpose
of section 17(d) is to avoid overreaching
by and unfair advantage to insiders.
Applicants assert that the proposed
credit facility is consistent with the
provisions, policies and purposes of the
Act in that it offers both reduced
borrowing costs and enhanced returns
on loaned funds to all participating
Funds and their shareholders.
Applicants note that each Fund would
have an equal opportunity to borrow
and lend on equal terms consistent with
its investment policies and fundamental
investment limitations. Applicants
assert that each Fund’s participation in
the proposed credit facility would be on
terms that are no different from or less
advantageous than that of other
participating Funds.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the
average of the Repo Rate and the Bank
Loan Rate.
2. On each business day when an
Interfund Loan is to be made, the
Interfund Lending Committee will
compare the Bank Loan Rate with the
Repo Rate and will make cash available
for Interfund Loans only if the Interfund
Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable to the
lending Fund than the Repo Rate and,
if applicable, the yield of any money
market fund in which the lending Fund
could otherwise invest; and (b) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than
the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding bank
borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund: (a) Will be at an interest rate
equal to or lower than the interest rate
of any outstanding bank loan; (b) will be
secured at least on an equal priority
basis with at least an equivalent
percentage of collateral to loan value as
any outstanding bank loan that requires
collateral; (c) will have a maturity no
longer than any outstanding bank loan
(and in any event not over seven days);
and (d) will provide that, if an event of
default by the Fund occurs under any
agreement evidencing an outstanding
bank loan to the Fund, that event of
default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund)
constitute an immediate event of default
under the Interfund Lending Agreement
entitling the lending Fund to call the
Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights
with respect to any collateral) and that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
such call will be made if the lending
bank exercises its right to call its loan
under its agreement with the borrowing
Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured
borrowing through the proposed credit
facility if its outstanding borrowings
from all sources immediately after the
interfund borrowing total 10% or less of
its total assets, provided that if the Fund
has a secured loan outstanding from any
other lender, including but not limited
to another Fund, the Fund’s interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that
requires collateral. If a Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings immediately
after an interfund borrowing would be
greater than 10% of its total assets, the
Fund may borrow through the proposed
credit facility only on a secured basis.
A Fund may not borrow through the
proposed credit facility or from any
other source if its total outstanding
borrowings immediately after such
borrowing would be more than 331⁄3%
of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has
outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
outstanding borrowings from all sources
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the
Fund must first secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
If the total outstanding borrowings of a
Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceed 10% of its total assets for any
other reason (such as a decline in net
asset value or because of shareholder
redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of
its outstanding Interfund Loans; (b)
reduce its outstanding indebtedness to
10% or less of its total assets; or (c)
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan
by the pledge of segregated collateral
with a market value at least equal to
102% of the outstanding principal value
of the loan until the Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed
10% of its total assets, at which time the
collateral called for by this condition 5
shall no longer be required. Until each
Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund’s total outstanding
borrowings exceed 10% is repaid or the
Fund’s total outstanding borrowings
cease to exceed 10% of its total assets,
the Fund will mark the value of the
collateral to market each day and will
pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value
of the collateral that secures each
outstanding Interfund Loan at least
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
equal to 102% of the outstanding
principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund
through the proposed credit facility if
the loan would cause its aggregate
outstanding loans through the proposed
credit facility to exceed 15% of the
lending Fund’s current net assets at the
time of the loan.
7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any
one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the
lending Fund’s net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans
will be limited to the time required to
obtain cash sufficient to repay such
Interfund Loan, through either the sale
of portfolio securities or the net sales of
the Fund’s shares, but in no event more
than seven days. Loans effected within
seven days of each other will be treated
as separate loan transactions for
purposes of this condition.
9. A Fund’s borrowings through the
proposed credit facility, as measured on
the day when the most recent loan was
made, will not exceed the greater of
125% of the Fund’s total net cash
redemptions for the preceding seven
calendar days or 102% of the Fund’s
sales fails for the preceding seven
calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called
on one business day’s notice by a
lending Fund and may be repaid on any
day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund’s participation in the
proposed credit facility must be
consistent with its investment objectives
and limitations and organizational
documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee
will calculate total Fund borrowing and
lending demand through the proposed
credit facility, and allocate loans on an
equitable basis among the Funds,
without the intervention of any portfolio
manager. The Interfund Lending
Committee will not solicit cash for the
proposed credit facility from any Fund
or prospectively publish or disseminate
loan demand data to portfolio managers.
The Interfund Lending Committee will
invest any amounts remaining after
satisfaction of borrowing demand in
accordance with the standing
instructions of the portfolio managers or
such remaining amounts will be
invested directly by the portfolio
managers of the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee
will monitor the Interfund Loan Rate
and the other terms and conditions of
the Interfund Loans and will make a
quarterly report to the Trustees of each
Fund concerning the participation of the
Funds in the proposed credit facility
and the terms and other conditions of
any extensions of credit under the credit
facility.
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
14. The Trustees of each Fund,
including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, will:
(a) Review, no less frequently than
quarterly, the Fund’s participation in
the proposed credit facility during the
preceding quarter for compliance with
the conditions of any order permitting
such transactions;
(b) establish the Bank Loan Rate
formula used to determine the interest
rate on Interfund Loans and review, no
less frequently than annually, the
continuing appropriateness of the Bank
Loan Rate formula; and
(c) review, no less frequently than
annually, the continuing
appropriateness of the Fund’s
participation in the proposed credit
facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is
not paid according to its terms and such
default is not cured within two business
days from its maturity or from the time
the lending Fund makes a demand for
payment under the provisions of the
Interfund Lending Agreement, the
Adviser will promptly refer such loan
for arbitration to an independent
arbitrator selected by the Trustees of
each Fund involved in the loan who
will serve as arbitrator of disputes
concerning Interfund Loans.2 The
arbitrator will resolve any problem
promptly, and the arbitrator’s decision
will be binding on both Funds. The
arbitrator will submit, at least annually,
a written report to the Trustees setting
forth a description of the nature of any
dispute and the actions taken by the
Funds to resolve the dispute.
16. Each Fund will maintain and
preserve for a period of not less than six
years from the end of the fiscal year in
which any transaction by it under the
proposed credit facility occurred, the
first two years in an easily accessible
place, written records of all such
transactions setting forth a description
of the terms of the transactions,
including the amount, the maturity and
the Interfund Loan Rate, the rate of
interest available at the time each
Interfund Loan is made on overnight
repurchase agreements and commercial
bank borrowings, the yield of any
money market fund in which the
lending Fund could otherwise invest,
and such other information presented to
the Fund’s Trustees in connection with
the review required by conditions 13
and 14.
17. The Adviser will prepare and
submit to the Trustees for review an
2 If the dispute involves Funds with different
Trustees, the respective Trustees of each Fund will
select an independent arbitrator that is satisfactory
to each Fund.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
initial report describing the operations
of the proposed credit facility and the
procedures to be implemented to ensure
that all Funds are treated fairly. After
the commencement of the proposed
credit facility, the Adviser will report on
the operations of the proposed credit
facility at the Trustees’ quarterly
meetings.
Each Fund’s chief compliance officer,
as defined in rule 38a–1(a)(4) under the
Act, shall prepare an annual report for
its Trustees each year that the Fund
participates in the proposed credit
facility, that evaluates the Fund’s
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the application and the
procedures established to achieve such
compliance. Each Fund’s chief
compliance officer will also annually
file a certification pursuant to Item
77Q3 of Form N–SAR as such Form may
be revised, amended or superseded from
time to time, for each year that the Fund
participates in the proposed credit
facility, that certifies that the Fund and
the Adviser have established procedures
reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the order. In particular,
such certification will address
procedures designed to achieve the
following objectives:
(a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will
be higher than the Repo Rate, and, if
applicable, the yield of any money
market fund in which the lending Fund
could otherwise invest, but lower than
the Bank Loan Rate;
(b) compliance with the collateral
requirements as set forth in the
application;
(c) compliance with the percentage
limitations on interfund borrowing and
lending;
(d) allocation of interfund borrowing
and lending demand in an equitable
manner and in accordance with
procedures established by the Trustees;
and
(e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does
not exceed the interest rate on any third
party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at
the time of the Interfund Loan.
Additionally, each Fund’s
independent public accountants, in
connection with their audit examination
of the Fund, will review the operation
of the proposed credit facility for
compliance with the conditions of the
application and their review will form
the basis, in part, of the auditor’s report
on internal accounting controls in Form
N–SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
proposed credit facility upon receipt of
requisite regulatory approval unless it
has fully disclosed in its prospectus
and/or statement of additional
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31993
information all material facts about its
intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–11873 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request; Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–2736
Extension:
Industry Guides, SEC File No. 270–069,
OMB Control No. 3235–0069.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
requests for extension of the previously
approved collections of information
discussed below.
Industries Guides are used by
registrants in certain industries as
disclosure guidelines to be followed in
presenting information to investors in
registration statements and reports
under the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77a
et seq.) and Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.). The paperwork burden from the
Industry Guides is imposed through the
forms that are subject to the disclosure
requirements in the Industry Guides and
is reflected in the analysis of these
documents. To avoid a Paperwork
Reduction Act inventory reflecting
duplicative burdens and for
administrative convenience, the
Commission estimates the total annual
burden imposed by the Industry Guides
to be one hour. The information
required by the Industry Guides is filed
on occasion and is mandatory. All
information is provided to the public.
The Industry Guides do not directly
impose any disclosure burden.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
The public may view the background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site,
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31988-31993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11873]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 32115; File No. 812-14573]
Nationwide Mutual Funds, et al.; Notice of Application
May 16, 2016.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to section 6(c)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') granting an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; pursuant to section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of
the Act; pursuant to sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to
permit certain joint arrangements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31989]]
Summary of the Application: Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered open-end management investment companies to
participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility.
Applicants: Nationwide Mutual Funds (``NMF''), and Nationwide Variable
Insurance Trust (``NVIT,'' and together with NMF, each a ``Trust,'' and
together, the ``Trusts'') and Nationwide Fund Advisors (the ``Initial
Adviser'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 29, 2015, and
amended on April 6, 2016.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on June 10, 2016, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: 1000 Continental
Drive, Suite 400, King of Prussia, PA 19406.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551-6819 or David J. Marcinkus, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. Each of NMF and NVIT is organized as a Delaware statutory trust.
Each Trust consists of multiple series (each series, a ``Fund,'' and
together, the ``Funds''). One series of NMF, the Nationwide Money
Market Fund, and one series of NVIT, the NVIT Money Market Fund,
operate as money market funds in reliance on rule 2a-7 under the Act.
(The Nationwide Money Market Fund, the NVIT Money Market Fund, and any
future Funds that rely on rule 2a-7 are the ``Money Market Funds.'')
The Funds are registered with the Commission as open-end management
investment companies. The Initial Adviser, a Delaware business trust,
serves as investment adviser to the Funds, and is registered as an
investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(``Advisers Act'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants request that the relief also apply to any other
open-end registered management investment company advised by the
Initial Adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Initial Adviser (such entity included in the
term ``Adviser'') that currently, or in the future, is part of the
same ``group of investment companies'' as the Trusts, as defined in
section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act (included in the term
``Trusts''). All entities that currently intend to rely on the
requested order have been named as applicants. Any other entity that
relies on the requested order in the future will comply with the
terms and conditions set forth in the application. Any other Adviser
will be registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act.
All references to the term ``Adviser'' herein include successors-in-
interest to the Adviser. Successors-in-interest are limited to any
entity resulting from a reorganization of the Adviser into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. At any particular time, while some Funds enter into repurchase
agreements, or invest their cash balances in money market funds or
other short-term instruments, other Funds may need to borrow money for
temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ``fail'' in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other
temporary purposes. The Trusts currently are parties to a senior
unsecured committed credit facility (as amended, modified, refinanced
or replaced from time to time, the ``Loan Agreement'') that provides a
line of credit to the participating Funds, and is furnished by a
syndicate of banks, including the Funds' custodian.
3. Applicants state that, generally, when a Fund borrows money
under the Loan Agreement, it pays interest on the loan at a rate that
is typically higher than the rate that is earned by other (non-
borrowing) Funds on investments in repurchase agreements, money market
funds, and other short-term instruments of the same maturity as the
bank loan. Applicants assert that this differential represents the
profit earned by the lender on loans and is not attributable to any
material difference in the credit quality or risk of such transactions.
4. The Trusts seek to enter into master interfund lending
agreements (``Interfund Lending Agreements'') with each other on behalf
of the Funds that would permit each Fund to lend money directly to and
borrow directly from other Funds through a credit facility for
temporary purposes (an ``Interfund Loan''). The Money Market Funds will
not participate as borrowers in the interfund lending facility.
Applicants state that the proposed credit facility is expected to both
reduce the Funds' potential borrowing costs and enhance the ability of
the lending Funds to earn higher rates of interest on their short-term
lendings. Although the proposed credit facility would reduce the Funds'
need to borrow from banks, the Funds would be free to establish and
maintain committed lines of credit or other borrowing arrangements with
unaffiliated banks.
5. Applicants anticipate that the proposed credit facility would
provide a borrowing Fund with savings at times when the cash position
of the borrowing Fund is insufficient to meet temporary cash
requirements. This situation could arise when shareholder redemptions
exceed anticipated volumes and certain Funds have insufficient cash on
hand to satisfy such redemptions. When the Funds liquidate portfolio
securities to meet redemption requests, they often do not receive
payment in settlement for up to three days (or longer for certain
foreign transactions). However, redemption requests normally are
effected immediately. The proposed credit facility would provide a
source of immediate, short-term liquidity pending settlement of the
sale of portfolio securities.
6. Applicants also anticipate that a Fund could use the proposed
credit facility when a sale of securities ``fails'' due to
circumstances beyond the Fund's control, such as a delay in the
delivery of cash to the Fund's custodian or improper delivery
instructions by the broker effecting the transaction. ``Sales fails''
may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to purchase a
security using the proceeds from securities sold. Alternatively, the
Fund could ``fail'' on its intended purchase due to lack of funds from
the previous sale, resulting in additional cost to the Fund. Use of the
proposed credit facility under these circumstances would enable the
Fund to have access to immediate short-term liquidity.
7. While bank borrowings generally could supply needed cash to
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the proposed
credit facility, a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than
those that would be payable under short-term loans offered by banks. In
addition, Funds making
[[Page 31990]]
short-term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn interest at a
rate higher than they otherwise could obtain from investing their cash
in repurchase agreements or money market funds. Thus, applicants assert
that the proposed credit facility would benefit both borrowing and
lending Funds.
8. The interest rate to be charged to the Funds on any Interfund
Loan (the ``Interfund Loan Rate'') would be the average of the ``Repo
Rate'' and the ``Bank Loan Rate,'' both as defined below. The Repo Rate
for any day would be the highest or best (after giving effect to
factors such as the credit quality of the counterparty) rate available
to a lending Fund from investment in overnight repurchase agreements
with counterparties approved by the Fund or its Adviser. The Bank Loan
Rate for any day would be calculated by the Interfund Lending
Committee, as defined below, each day an Interfund Loan is made
according to a formula established by each Fund's board of trustees
(the ``Trustees'') intended to approximate the lowest interest rate at
which bank short-term loans would be available to the Funds. The
formula would be based upon a publicly available rate (e.g., federal
funds plus 25 basis points) and would vary with this rate so as to
reflect changing bank loan rates. The initial formula and any
subsequent modifications to the formula would be subject to the
approval of each Fund's Trustees. In addition, each Fund's Trustees
would periodically review the continuing appropriateness of using the
formula to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the relationship
between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates that would be
available to the Funds.
9. Certain members of the Adviser's fund administration personnel
and money market analysts (the ``Interfund Lending Committee'') will
administer the credit facility. No portfolio manager of any Fund will
serve as a member of the Interfund Lending Committee. On any day on
which a Fund intends to borrow money, the Interfund Lending Committee
would make an Interfund Loan from a lending Fund to a borrowing Fund
only if the Interfund Loan Rate is: (i) More favorable to the lending
Fund than the Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of any money
market fund in which the lending Fund could otherwise invest, and (ii)
more favorable to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
10. Under the proposed credit facility, the portfolio managers for
each participating Fund could provide standing instructions to
participate daily as a borrower or lender; alternatively, the portfolio
manager could provide instructions from time to time as to when the
Fund wishes to participate as a borrower or lender. The Interfund
Lending Committee on each business day would collect data on the
uninvested cash and borrowing requirements of all participating Funds.
Once it had determined the aggregate amount of cash available for loans
and borrowing demand, the Interfund Lending Committee would allocate
loans among borrowing Funds without any further communication from the
portfolio managers of the Funds. Applicants anticipate that there
typically will be far more available uninvested cash each day than
borrowing demand. Therefore, after the Interfund Lending Committee has
allocated cash for Interfund Loans, the Interfund Lending Committee
will invest any remaining cash in accordance with the standing
instructions of the portfolio managers or such remaining amounts will
be invested directly by the portfolio managers of the Funds.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee would allocate borrowing demand
and cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Interfund
Lending Committee believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain
administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of
filing requests to participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and the need to
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each loan normally would be
allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of participants
necessary to complete the loan transaction. The method of allocation
and related administrative procedures would be approved by each Fund's
Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are not ``interested
persons'' of the Fund, as that term is defined in section 2(a)(19) of
the Act (``Independent Trustees''), to ensure that both borrowing and
lending Funds participate on an equitable basis.
12. The Adviser would: (a) Monitor the Interfund Loan Rate and the
other terms and conditions of the loans; (b) limit the borrowings and
loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that they comply with the
Fund's investment policies and limitations; (c) ensure equitable
treatment of each Fund; and (d) make quarterly reports to the Trustees
concerning any transactions by the Funds under the proposed credit
facility and the Interfund Loan Rate charged.
13. The Adviser, through the Interfund Lending Committee, would
administer the proposed credit facility as a disinterested fiduciary as
part of its duties under the investment advisory agreement and
administrative agreements with each Fund and would receive no
additional fee as compensation for its services in connection with the
administration of the proposed credit facility. The Adviser may collect
standard pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping and accounting fees
associated with the transfer of cash and/or securities in connection
with repurchase and lending transactions generally, including
transactions effected through the proposed credit facility. Such fees
would be no higher than those applicable for comparable bank loan
transactions.
14. No Fund may participate in the proposed credit facility unless:
(a) The Fund has obtained shareholder approval for its participation,
if such approval is required by law; (b) the Fund has fully disclosed
all material information concerning the credit facility in its
prospectus and/or statement of additional information; and (c) the
Fund's participation in the credit facility is consistent with its
investment objectives and limitations and organizational documents.
15. As part of the Trustees' review of the continuing
appropriateness of a Fund's participation in the proposed credit
facility as required by condition 14, the Trustees of the Fund,
including a majority of the Independent Trustees, also will review the
process in place to appropriately assess: (i) If the Fund participates
as a lender, any effect its participation may have on the Fund's
liquidity risk; and (ii) if the Fund participates as a borrower,
whether the Fund's portfolio liquidity is sufficient to satisfy its
obligations under the facility along with its other liquidity needs.
16. In connection with the credit facility, applicants request an
order under section 6(c) of the Act exempting them from the provisions
of sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act exempting them from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under sections
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act exempting them from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and under section 17(d) of the Act
and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or affiliated person of an
affiliated person, from borrowing money or other property from the
registered investment company. Section 21(b) of the Act generally
prohibits any registered
[[Page 31991]]
management company from lending money or other property to any person,
directly or indirectly, if that person controls or is under common
control with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act defines an
``affiliated person'' of another person, in part, to be any person
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act defines
``control'' as the ``power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company,'' but excludes circumstances in
which ``such power is solely the result of an official position with
such company.'' Applicants state that the Funds may be under common
control by virtue of having common investment advisers and/or by having
common Trustees and officers.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be
granted where an exemption is ``necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of [the Act].''
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are
fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any
person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy of
the investment company as recited in its registration statement and
with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the
proposed arrangements satisfy these standards for the reasons discussed
below.
3. Applicants assert that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act
were intended to prevent a party with strong potential adverse
interests to, and some influence over the investment decisions of, a
registered investment company from causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of such party and that are detrimental to the best interests of
the investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do not raise these concerns
because: (a) The Adviser, through the Interfund Lending Committee,
would administer the program as a disinterested fiduciary as part of
its duties under the investment advisory agreement and administrative
agreements with each Fund; (b) all Interfund Loans would consist only
of uninvested cash reserves that the lending Fund otherwise would
invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other short-term
instruments either directly or through a money market fund; (c) the
Interfund Loans would not involve a significantly greater risk than
such other investments; (d) the lending Fund would receive interest at
a rate higher than it could otherwise obtain through such other
investments; and (e) the borrowing Fund would pay interest at a rate
lower than otherwise available to it under its bank loan agreements and
avoid some up-front commitment fees associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, applicants assert that the other terms and conditions
that applicants propose also would effectively preclude the possibility
of any Fund obtaining an undue advantage over any other Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of
such a person, from selling securities or other property to the
investment company. Section 17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an
affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, from purchasing securities or other property
from the investment company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits a registered investment company from purchasing or otherwise
acquiring any security issued by any other investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth in that section.
5. Applicants state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to
repay an Interfund Loan could be deemed to constitute a security for
the purposes of sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1). Applicants also state
that any pledge of assets in connection with an Interfund Loan could be
construed as a purchase of the borrowing Fund's securities or other
property for purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act. Section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt persons
or transactions from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the
extent that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants submit that the requested
exemptions from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 12(d)(1) are
appropriate in the public interest, and consistent with the protection
of investors and policies and purposes of the Act for all the reasons
set forth above in support of their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b). Applicants also state that the requested relief
from section 17(a)(2) of the Act meets the standards of section 6(c)
and 17(b) because any collateral pledged to secure an Interfund Loan
would be subject to the same conditions imposed by any other lender to
a Fund that imposes conditions on the quality of or access to
collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is another Fund) or the same
or better conditions (in any other circumstance).
6. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was intended to prevent
the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid imposing on
investors additional and duplicative costs and fees attendant upon
multiple layers of investments. Applicants submit that the proposed
credit facility does not involve these abuses. Applicants note that
there will be no duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or their
shareholders, and that the Adviser will receive no additional
compensation for its services in administering the credit facility.
Applicants also note that the purpose of the proposed credit facility
is to provide economic benefits for all the participating Funds and
their shareholders.
7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment
companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is
permitted to borrow from any bank, provided, that immediately after the
borrowing, there is asset coverage of at least 300 per centum for all
borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term
``senior security'' generally includes any bond, debenture, note or
similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing
indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief under section 6(c)
from section 18(f)(1) only to the limited extent necessary to permit a
Fund to lend to or borrow directly from other Funds. The Funds would
remain subject to the requirement of section 18(f)(l) that all
borrowings of a Fund, including combined interfund and bank borrowings,
have at least 300% asset coverage. Based on the conditions and
safeguards described in the application, applicants submit that to
allow the Funds to borrow directly from other Funds pursuant to the
proposed credit facility is consistent with the purposes and policies
of section 18(f)(l).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act generally
prohibit an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or
any affiliated person of such a person, when acting as principal, from
effecting any joint transaction in which the investment company
participates, unless, upon application, the transaction has been
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d-1(b) under the Act provides that
in passing upon an application filed under the rule, the Commission
will consider whether the participation of the registered investment
company in a joint enterprise on the basis proposed is
[[Page 31992]]
consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and
the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or
less advantageous than that of the other participants.
9. Applicants assert that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid
overreaching by and unfair advantage to insiders. Applicants assert
that the proposed credit facility is consistent with the provisions,
policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both reduced
borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each
Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms
consistent with its investment policies and fundamental investment
limitations. Applicants assert that each Fund's participation in the
proposed credit facility would be on terms that are no different from
or less advantageous than that of other participating Funds.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the average of the Repo Rate and
the Bank Loan Rate.
2. On each business day when an Interfund Loan is to be made, the
Interfund Lending Committee will compare the Bank Loan Rate with the
Repo Rate and will make cash available for Interfund Loans only if the
Interfund Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable to the lending Fund than the
Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of any money market fund in
which the lending Fund could otherwise invest; and (b) more favorable
to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding bank borrowings, any Interfund Loans
to the Fund: (a) Will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than the
interest rate of any outstanding bank loan; (b) will be secured at
least on an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage
of collateral to loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires
collateral; (c) will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding
bank loan (and in any event not over seven days); and (d) will provide
that, if an event of default by the Fund occurs under any agreement
evidencing an outstanding bank loan to the Fund, that event of default
will automatically (without need for action or notice by the lending
Fund) constitute an immediate event of default under the Interfund
Lending Agreement entitling the lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan
(and exercise all rights with respect to any collateral) and that such
call will be made if the lending bank exercises its right to call its
loan under its agreement with the borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the proposed
credit facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources
immediately after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its
total assets, provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding
from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the
Fund's interfund borrowing will be secured on at least an equal
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a
Fund's total outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund
borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may
borrow through the proposed credit facility only on a secured basis. A
Fund may not borrow through the proposed credit facility or from any
other source if its total outstanding borrowings immediately after such
borrowing would be more than 33\1/3\% of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from
all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated
collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding
borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceed 10% of its
total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset value
or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of its outstanding Interfund
Loans; (b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its
total assets; or (c) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the
pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to
102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund's
total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets,
at which time the collateral called for by this condition 5 shall no
longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings exceed 10% is
repaid or the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10%
of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to
market each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value of the collateral that secures
each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the proposed credit
facility if the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans
through the proposed credit facility to exceed 15% of the lending
Fund's current net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of
the lending Fund's net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time
required to obtain cash sufficient to repay such Interfund Loan,
through either the sale of portfolio securities or the net sales of the
Fund's shares, but in no event more than seven days. Loans effected
within seven days of each other will be treated as separate loan
transactions for purposes of this condition.
9. A Fund's borrowings through the proposed credit facility, as
measured on the day when the most recent loan was made, will not exceed
the greater of 125% of the Fund's total net cash redemptions for the
preceding seven calendar days or 102% of the Fund's sales fails for the
preceding seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice
by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund's participation in the proposed credit facility must be
consistent with its investment objectives and limitations and
organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee will calculate total Fund
borrowing and lending demand through the proposed credit facility, and
allocate loans on an equitable basis among the Funds, without the
intervention of any portfolio manager. The Interfund Lending Committee
will not solicit cash for the proposed credit facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio
managers. The Interfund Lending Committee will invest any amounts
remaining after satisfaction of borrowing demand in accordance with the
standing instructions of the portfolio managers or such remaining
amounts will be invested directly by the portfolio managers of the
Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee will monitor the Interfund Loan
Rate and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and will
make a quarterly report to the Trustees of each Fund concerning the
participation of the Funds in the proposed credit facility and the
terms and other conditions of any extensions of credit under the credit
facility.
[[Page 31993]]
14. The Trustees of each Fund, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees, will:
(a) Review, no less frequently than quarterly, the Fund's
participation in the proposed credit facility during the preceding
quarter for compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such
transactions;
(b) establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to determine the
interest rate on Interfund Loans and review, no less frequently than
annually, the continuing appropriateness of the Bank Loan Rate formula;
and
(c) review, no less frequently than annually, the continuing
appropriateness of the Fund's participation in the proposed credit
facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its
terms and such default is not cured within two business days from its
maturity or from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment
under the provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Adviser
will promptly refer such loan for arbitration to an independent
arbitrator selected by the Trustees of each Fund involved in the loan
who will serve as arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund Loans.\2\
The arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly, and the arbitrator's
decision will be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator will submit, at
least annually, a written report to the Trustees setting forth a
description of the nature of any dispute and the actions taken by the
Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If the dispute involves Funds with different Trustees, the
respective Trustees of each Fund will select an independent
arbitrator that is satisfactory to each Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction
by it under the proposed credit facility occurred, the first two years
in an easily accessible place, written records of all such transactions
setting forth a description of the terms of the transactions, including
the amount, the maturity and the Interfund Loan Rate, the rate of
interest available at the time each Interfund Loan is made on overnight
repurchase agreements and commercial bank borrowings, the yield of any
money market fund in which the lending Fund could otherwise invest, and
such other information presented to the Fund's Trustees in connection
with the review required by conditions 13 and 14.
17. The Adviser will prepare and submit to the Trustees for review
an initial report describing the operations of the proposed credit
facility and the procedures to be implemented to ensure that all Funds
are treated fairly. After the commencement of the proposed credit
facility, the Adviser will report on the operations of the proposed
credit facility at the Trustees' quarterly meetings.
Each Fund's chief compliance officer, as defined in rule 38a-
1(a)(4) under the Act, shall prepare an annual report for its Trustees
each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility,
that evaluates the Fund's compliance with the terms and conditions of
the application and the procedures established to achieve such
compliance. Each Fund's chief compliance officer will also annually
file a certification pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form N-SAR as such Form
may be revised, amended or superseded from time to time, for each year
that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, that
certifies that the Fund and the Adviser have established procedures
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions
of the order. In particular, such certification will address procedures
designed to achieve the following objectives:
(a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate,
and, if applicable, the yield of any money market fund in which the
lending Fund could otherwise invest, but lower than the Bank Loan Rate;
(b) compliance with the collateral requirements as set forth in the
application;
(c) compliance with the percentage limitations on interfund
borrowing and lending;
(d) allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an
equitable manner and in accordance with procedures established by the
Trustees; and
(e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does not exceed the interest rate
on any third party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the time of the
Interfund Loan.
Additionally, each Fund's independent public accountants, in
connection with their audit examination of the Fund, will review the
operation of the proposed credit facility for compliance with the
conditions of the application and their review will form the basis, in
part, of the auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form
N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the proposed credit facility upon
receipt of requisite regulatory approval unless it has fully disclosed
in its prospectus and/or statement of additional information all
material facts about its intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-11873 Filed 5-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P