Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to a Corporate Transaction Involving Its Indirect Parent, 30386-30395 [2016-11406]

Download as PDF 30386 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–065 and should be submitted on or before June 6, 2016. it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.28 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. 2016–11411 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am] Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–77795; File No. SR–ISE Gemini–2016–05] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to a Corporate Transaction Involving Its Indirect Parent Paper Comments asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ–2016–065 on the subject line. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 28, 2016 ISE Gemini, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE Gemini’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–065. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 May 10, 2016. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange is hereby filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change (the ‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’) in connection with a proposed business transaction (the ‘‘Transaction’’) involving the Exchange’s ultimate, indirect, non-U.S. upstream ¨ owners, Deutsche Borse AG (‘‘Deutsche ¨ Borse’’) and Eurex Frankfurt AG (‘‘Eurex Frankfurt’’), and Nasdaq, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’). Nasdaq is the parent company of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ Exchange’’), NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx Exchange’’), NASDAQ BX, Inc. (‘‘BX Exchange’’), Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation (‘‘BSECC’’) and Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia 28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (‘‘SCCP’’).3 Upon completion of the Transaction (the ‘‘Closing’’), the Exchange’s indirect parent company, U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. (‘‘U.S. Exchange Holdings’’), will become a direct subsidiary of Nasdaq. The Exchange will therefore become an indirect subsidiary of Nasdaq and, in addition to the Exchange’s current affiliation with International Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) and ISE Mercury, LLC (‘‘ISE Mercury’’), an affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange.4 In order to effect the Transaction, the Exchange hereby seeks the Commission’s approval of the following: (i) That certain corporate resolutions that were previously established by entities that will cease to be non-U.S. upstream owners of the Exchange after the Transaction will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing; (ii) that certain governing documents of Nasdaq will be considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing; (iii) that the Third Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the ‘‘Trust Agreement’’) that currently exists among International Securities Exchange Holdings, Inc. (‘‘ISE Holdings’’), U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as defined therein) with respect to the ‘‘ISE Trust’’ will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing and, thereafter, that the parties to the Trust Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate steps necessary to repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE Trust; (iv) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ISE Holdings (‘‘ISE Holdings COI’’) to eliminate provisions relating to the Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust and, in this respect, to reinstate certain text of the ISE Holdings COI that existed ¨ prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings; (v) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of ISE Holdings (the ‘‘ISE Holdings Bylaws’’) to waive certain voting and ownership restrictions in the ISE Holdings COI to permit Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the outstanding 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58179 (July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 2008) (SR– Phlx–2008–31); 58324 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008–02; SR– BSE–2008–23; SR–BSE–2008–25; SR–BSECC–2008– 01). 4 The Exchange’s current affiliates, ISE and ISE Mercury, have submitted nearly identical proposed rule changes. See SR–ISE–2016–11 and SR– ISEMercury–2016–10. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the Transaction; and (vi) to amend and restate the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Exchange Holdings (‘‘U.S. Exchange Holdings COI’’) to eliminate references therein to the Trust Agreement. The Exchange requests that the Proposed Rule Change become operative at the Closing of the Transaction. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Commission’s Public Reference Room and on the Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange submits this Proposed Rule Change to seek the Commission’s approval of various changes to the organizational and governance documents of the Exchange’s current owners and related actions that are necessary in connection with the Closing of the Transaction, as described below. The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange is not proposing any amendments to its trading or regulatory rules at this time relating to the Transaction.5 The Exchange would continue to be registered as a national securities exchange, with separate rules, membership rosters, and listings, distinct from the rules, membership rosters, and listings of NASDAQ 5 If the Exchange determines to make any such changes, it will seek the approval of the Commission only after the approval of this Proposed Rule Change to the extent required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (‘‘Act’’), the Commission’s rules thereunder, or the Exchange’s rules. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 Exchange, Phlx Exchange and BX Exchange as well as from its current affiliates, ISE and ISE Mercury. Neither the Exchange nor its current affiliates engage in clearing securities transactions, nor would they do so after the Transaction. Additionally, the Exchange would continue to be a separate self-regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’). 1. Current Ownership Structure of the Exchange On December 17, 2007, ISE Holdings, the sole, direct parent of the Exchange, became a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Exchange Holdings.6 U.S. Exchange Holdings is 85% directly owned by Eurex Frankfurt and 15% ¨ directly owned by Deutsche Borse. Eurex Frankfurt is a wholly-owned, ¨ direct subsidiary of Deutsche Borse.7 ¨ Deutsche Borse therefore owns 100% of U.S. Exchange Holdings through its aggregate direct and indirect ownership. 2. The Transaction On March 9, 2016, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) was ¨ entered into among Deutsche Borse, Eurex Frankfurt and Nasdaq. Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Agreement, at the Closing, Deutsche ¨ Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will sell, transfer and deliver to Nasdaq, and Nasdaq will purchase, the capital stock of U.S. Exchange Holdings. 3. Post-Closing Ownership Structure of the Exchange As a result of the Transaction, Nasdaq will directly own 100% of the equity interest of U.S. Exchange Holdings. U.S. Exchange Holdings will remain the sole, direct owner of ISE Holdings. ISE Holdings will remain the sole, direct owner of the Exchange. The Exchange will therefore become an indirect subsidiary of Nasdaq and Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. The Exchange will become an affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. As a result of the ¨ Transaction, Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be owners of the Exchange. The Exchange will therefore cease to have any Non-U.S. Upstream Owners. The Transaction will not have any effect on ISE Holdings’ direct 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56955 (December 13, 2007), 72 FR 71979 (December 19, 2007) (SR–ISE–2007–101). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66834 (April 19, 2012), 77 FR 24752 (April 25, 2012) (SR– ¨ ISE–2012–21). Each of Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt is referred to as a ‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream Owner’’ and collectively as the ‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream Owners.’’ PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30387 ownership of the Exchange. However, consummation of the Transaction is subject to approval of this Proposed Rule Change by the Commission, as described below. 4. Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions ¨ Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt, as the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the Exchange, have previously taken appropriate steps to incorporate provisions regarding ownership, jurisdiction, books and records, and other issues related to their control of the Exchange. Specifically, each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners has adopted resolutions (‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions’’), which were previously approved by the Commission, to incorporate these concepts with respect to itself, as well as its board members, officers, employees, and agents (as applicable), to the extent that they are involved in the activities of the Exchange.8 For example, the resolution of each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners provides that it shall comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and with the Exchange. In addition, the resolution of each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners provides that the board members, including each person who becomes a board member, would so consent to comply and cooperate and the particular Non-U.S. Upstream Owner would take reasonable steps to cause its officers, employees, and agents to also comply and cooperate, to the extent that he or she is involved in the activities of the Exchange. Section 19(b) of the Act,9 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,10 require an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the Commission. Although the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners are not SROs, the Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions have previously been filed with the Commission as stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore are considered rules of the Exchange.11 As Deutsche ¨ Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the Exchange after the Transaction, the Exchange proposes that the ¨ resolutions of Deutsche Borse and Eurex 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (File No. 10–209) (Order Approving Topaz Exchange, LLC for Registration as a National Securities Exchange). The Exchange was originally named ‘‘Topaz Exchange, LLC.’’ 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b). 10 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 11 See File No. 10–209, supra note 8. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 30388 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices Frankfurt will cease to be stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and, therefore, will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.12 5. Nasdaq Governing Documents asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange upon the Closing of the Transaction. As described above, section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b– 4 thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the Commission. Although the Exchange’s existing U.S. upstream owners are not SROs, their governing documents have previously been filed with the Commission as stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore are considered rules of the Exchange.13 The Exchange proposes that the Nasdaq Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (‘‘Nasdaq COI’’) and the Nasdaq Bylaws (‘‘Nasdaq Bylaws, and together with the Nasdaq COI, the ‘‘Nasdaq governing documents’’) will become stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange as of the Closing and, therefore, will be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.14 The Nasdaq Bylaws contain certain provisions regarding ownership, jurisdiction, books and records, and other issues, with respect to Nasdaq, as well as its board members, officers, employees, and agents (as applicable), 12 The ‘‘Form of German Parent Corporate Resolutions’’ is attached hereto as Exhibit 5A. As referenced above, resolutions in relation to board members, officers, employees, and agents (as ¨ applicable) of Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt also would cease accordingly. Resolution 11 provides that, notwithstanding any provision of the resolutions, before: (a) Any amendment to or repeal of any provision of this or any of the resolutions; or (b) any action that would have the effect of amending or repealing any provision of the resolutions shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may ¨ be. In addition, Deutsche Borse, Eurex Frankfurt, U.S. Exchange Holdings, ISE Holdings, and ISE previously became parties to an agreement to provide for adequate funding for the Exchange’s regulatory responsibilities. The Exchange subsequently became a party to the agreement along with ISE Mercury. This agreement will be terminated upon the Closing of the Transaction. 13 See File No. 10–209, supra note 8. 14 The Nasdaq COI dated January 24, 2014 is attached hereto as Exhibit 5B along with subsequent amendments thereto dated November 17, 2014 and September 8, 2015 and the Certificate of Elimination of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dated January 27, 2014. The Nasdaq Bylaws are attached hereto as Exhibit 5C. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 relating to Nasdaq’s control of any ‘‘SelfRegulatory Subsidiary’’ (i.e., any subsidiary of Nasdaq that is an SRO as defined under section 3(a)(26) of the Act).15 The Exchange would be a ‘‘SelfRegulatory Subsidiary’’ of Nasdaq upon the Closing of the Transaction. The provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws are comparable to the provisions of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners Resolutions, including in the following manner: • Giving due regard to the preservation of the independence of the self-regulatory function of each of Nasdaq’s Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries.16 • Maintaining the confidentiality of all books and records of each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary reflecting confidential information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of such SelfRegulatory Subsidiary (including but not limited to disciplinary matters, trading data, trading practices and audit information) that comes into Nasdaq’s possession, which shall not be used for any non-regulatory purposes; making such books and records available for inspection and copying by the Commission; and maintaining such books and records relating to each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary in the United States.17 • To the extent they are related to the activities of a Self-Regulatory Subsidiary, the books, records, premises, officers, Directors, and employees of Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books, records, premises, officers, directors, and employees of such SelfRegulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of, and subject to oversight pursuant to, the Act.18 • Compliance by Nasdaq with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, cooperation by Nasdaq with the Commission and Nasdaq’s SelfRegulatory Subsidiaries, and reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its agents to cooperate with the Commission and, where applicable, the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries pursuant to their regulatory authority.19 15 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26). Bylaws Section 12.1(a) (Self-Regulatory Organization Functions of the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries). 17 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(b). 18 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(c). 19 Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.2(a) (Cooperation with the Commission). The officers, Directors, and employees of Nasdaq, by virtue of their acceptance of such position, shall be deemed to agree to cooperate with the Commission and each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary in respect of the Commission’s oversight responsibilities regarding the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries and the selfregulatory functions and responsibilities of the SelfRegulatory Subsidiaries. Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.2(b). 16 Nasdaq PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • Consent by Nasdaq and its officers, Directors, and employees to the jurisdiction of the United States federal courts, the Commission, and each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of any suit, action or proceeding pursuant to the United States federal securities laws, and the rules and regulations thereunder, arising out of, or relating to, the activities of any SelfRegulatory Subsidiary.20 • Reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its current and future officers, Directors, and employees, to consent in writing to the applicability to them of certain provisions of the Nasdaq Bylaws, as applicable, with respect to their activities related to any SelfRegulatory Subsidiary.21 • Approval by the Commission under section 19 of the Act prior to any resolution of the Nasdaq Board to approve an exemption for any person from the ownership limitations of the Nasdaq COI.22 • Filing with, or filing with and approval by, the Commission (as the case may be) under section 19 of the Act prior to amending the Nasdaq COI or the Nasdaq Bylaws.23 The Exchange believes that the provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws should minimize the potential that a person could improperly interfere with, or restrict the ability of, the Commission or the Exchange to effectively carry out their regulatory oversight responsibilities under the Act.24 Additionally, and similar to the ISE Holdings COI, the Nasdaq COI imposes limits on direct and indirect changes in control, which are designed to prevent any shareholder from exercising undue control over the operation of its SRO subsidiaries and to ensure that its SRO subsidiaries and the Commission are 20 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.3 (Consent to Jurisdiction). 21 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.4 (Further Assurances). 22 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5 (Board Action with Respect to Voting Limitations of the Certificate of Incorporation). 23 Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.6 (Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation); Nasdaq Bylaws Section 11.3 (Review by Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries). 24 The U.S. Exchange Holdings COI also includes similar provisions, including that U.S. Exchange Holdings will take reasonable steps necessary to cause ISE Holdings to be in compliance with the ‘‘Ownership Limit’’ and the ‘‘Voting Limit.’’ See U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, Articles TENTH through SIXTEENTH. The U.S. Exchange Holdings COI provides that U.S. Exchange Holdings will notify the Exchange’s Board if any ‘‘Person,’’ either alone or together with its ‘‘Related Persons,’’ at any time owns (whether by acquisition or by a change in the number of shares outstanding) of record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, or 40% or more of the then outstanding shares of U.S. Exchange Holdings. See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6, at 71981. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices The ISE Holdings COI currently contains certain ownership limits (‘‘Ownership Limits’’) and voting limits (‘‘Voting Limits’’) with respect to the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings.30 The Trust Agreement was entered into in 2007 to provide for an automatic transfer of ISE Holdings shares to a trust (the ‘‘ISE Trust’’) if a Person 31 were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of these Ownership Limits and Voting Limits, through ownership of one of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners, without obtaining the approval of the Commission. In this regard, the Trust Agreement serves four general purposes: (i) To accept, hold and dispose of Trust Shares 32 on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein; (ii) to determine whether a Material Compliance Event 33 has occurred or is continuing; (iii) to determine whether the occurrence and continuation of a Material Compliance Event requires the exercise of the Call Option; 34 and (iv) to transfer Deposited Shares from the Trust to the Trust Beneficiary 35 as provided in section 4.2(h) therein. The ISE Trust, and corresponding Trust Agreement, is the mechanism by which the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in the ISE Holdings COI currently would be protected in the event that a Non-U.S. Upstream Owner purportedly transfers any related ownership or voting rights other than in accordance with the ISE Holdings COI. As described above, section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b–4 thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the Commission. Although 25 See Article FOURTH, Section C of the Nasdaq COI. 26 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39). 27 See Article FOURTH, section C.6. of the Nasdaq COI. Specifically, the Nasdaq Board must determine that granting such exemption would (1) not reasonably be expected to diminish the quality of, or public confidence in, Nasdaq or the other operations of Nasdaq, on the ability to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and on investors and the public, and (2) promote just and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to an facilitating transactions in securities or assist in the removal of impediments to or perfection of the mechanisms for a free and open market and a national market system. 28 See Section 12.5 of the Nasdaq Bylaws. 29 The Trust Agreement exists among ISE Holdings, U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as defined therein). By its terms, the Trust Agreement originally related solely to ISE Holdings’ ownership of ISE, and not to any other national securities exchange that ISE Holdings might control, directly or indirectly. In 2010, the Commission approved proposed rule changes that revised the Trust Agreement to replace references to ISE with references to any Controlled National Securities Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59135 (December 22, 2008), 73 FR 79954 (December 30, 2008) (SR–ISE–2008–85) and 61498 (February 4, 2010), 75 FR 7299 (February 18, 2010) (SR–ISE–2009–90); see also ISE Trust Agreement, Articles I and II, Sections 1.1 and 2.6. Thus, the ISE Trust Agreement also applies to ISE Gemini and ISE Mercury. 30 See Article FOURTH, Section III of the ISE Holdings COI. 31 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6. Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Person’’ means any individual, corporation (including not-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association, organization, government or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or any other entity of any kind or nature. 32 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Trust Shares’’ means either Excess Shares or Deposited Shares, or both, as the case may be. The term ‘‘Excess Shares’’ means that a Person obtained an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of certain ownership and voting restrictions pursuant to Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI, through, for example, ownership of one of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners or U.S. Exchange Holdings, without obtaining the approval of the Commission. The term ‘‘Deposited Shares’’ means shares that are transferred to the Trust pursuant to the Trust’s exercise of the Call Option. 33 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Material Compliance Event’’ means, with respect to a NonU.S. Upstream Owner, any state of facts, development, event, circumstance, condition, occurrence or effect that results in the failure of any of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners to adhere to their respective commitments under the resolutions (i.e., as referenced in note 7) in any material respect. 34 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Call Option’’ means the option granted by the Trust Beneficiary to the Trust to call the Voting Shares as set forth in Section 4.2 therein. 35 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Trust Beneficiary’’ means U.S. Exchange Holdings. able to carry out their regulatory obligations under the Act. Specifically, no person who beneficially owns shares of common stock, preferred stock, or notes of Nasdaq in excess of 5% of the securities generally entitled to vote may vote the shares in excess of 5%.25 This limitation would mitigate the potential for any Nasdaq shareholder to exercise undue control over the operations of the Exchange, and it facilitates the Exchange’s and the Commission’s ability to carry out their regulatory obligations under the Act. The Nasdaq Board may approve exemptions from the 5% voting limitation for any person that is not a broker-dealer, an affiliate of a broker-dealer, or a person subject to a statutory disqualification under section 3(a)(39) of the Act,26 provided that the Nasdaq Board also determines that granting such exemption would be consistent with the self-regulatory obligations of its SRO subsidiary.27 Further, any such exemption from the 5% voting limitation would not be effective until approved by the Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Act.28 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 6. Trust Agreement 29 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30389 the ISE Trust is not an SRO, the Trust Agreement has previously been filed with the Commission as stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore is considered rules of the Exchange.36 The purpose for which the ISE Trust was formed will not be relevant after the Closing of the Transaction, given that the Exchange will no longer have Non-U.S. Upstream Owners and that the Exchange’s current and resulting U.S. upstream owners’ governing documents provide for similar protections (e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes that the Trust Agreement will cease to be stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and, therefore, will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.37 The Exchange also proposes that, as of the Closing of the Transaction, the parties to the Trust Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate steps necessary to repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE Trust. 7. ISE Holdings COI The ISE Holdings COI was amended in 2007 in relation to the ownership of ¨ ISE by Deutsche Borse.38 At that time, provisions were added to the ISE Holdings COI relating to the ISE Trust to provide for an automatic transfer of ISE Holdings’ shares to the ISE Trust if a Person were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of Voting Limits and Ownership Limits, without obtaining the approval of the Commission. As described above, the Exchange is proposing that the Trust Agreement will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction. 36 See File No. 10–209, supra note 8. current Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 5D. Section 8.2 of the Trust Agreement provides, in part, that, for so long as ISE Holdings controls, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, before any amendment or repeal of any provision of the Trust Agreement shall be effective, such amendment or repeal shall be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, as applicable, and if such amendment or repeal must be filed with or filed with and approved by the Commission under Section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder before such amendment or repeal may be effectuated, then such amendment or repeal shall not be effectuated until filed with or filed with and approved by the Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange notes that, according to the terms of the Trust Agreement, sections 6.1 and 6.2 thereof, which relate to limits on disclosure of confidential information and certain permitted disclosure, will survive the termination of the Trust Agreement for a period of ten years. 38 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6. 37 The E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 30390 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to remove provisions relating to the Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust from the ISE Holdings COI.39 The Exchange proposes to reinstate certain provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that existed ¨ prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings that were removed upon introduction of the provisions relating to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement.40 The changes to the ISE Holdings COI proposed herein would describe the corrective treatment of ‘‘Excess Shares’’ (i.e., any sale, transfer, assignment or pledge that, if effective would result in any Person, either alone or together with its Related Persons, owning shares in excess of any of the Ownership Limits). The proposed changes would apply corrective procedures if any Person, alone or together with its Related Persons, purports to sell, transfer, assign or pledge any shares of ISE Holdings stock in violation of the Ownership Limits. Specifically, any such sale, transfer, assignment or pledge would be void, and that number of shares in excess of the Ownership Limits would be deemed to have been transferred to ISE Holdings, as ‘‘Special Trustee’’ of a ‘‘Charitable Trust’’ for the exclusive benefit of a ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ to 39 The proposed, amended ISE Holdings COI is attached hereto as Exhibit 5E. Capitalized terms used to describe the ISE Holdings COI that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings prescribed in the ISE Holdings COI. Article FOURTEENTH of the ISE Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange Holdings shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision of the ISE Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may be. 40 See, e.g., Exhibit 5A to SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51029 (January 12, 2005), 70 FR 3233 (January 21, 2005) (SR–ISE–2004–29), through which ISE, which was organized as a corporation at that time (i.e., ‘‘ISE, Inc.’’), amended its Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution at that time in connection with ISE’s then-contemplated initial public offering. ISE subsequently reorganized into a holding company structure, whereby it became a limited liability company, as it is so organized currently, and whereby ISE Holdings became the sole owner of ISE. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53705 (April 21, 2006), 71 FR 25260 (April 28, 2006) (SR–ISE–2006–04). As a result, and at the time of the reorganization, ISE eliminated the ‘‘ISE, Inc.’’ Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution. The ISE Holdings COI and ISE Holdings Bylaws were introduced at that time and included substantially the same ownership and voting limitations that had been contained in the ISE, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 be determined by ISE Holdings.41 These corrective procedures also would apply if there is any other event causing any holder of ISE Holdings stock to exceed the Ownership Limits, such as a repurchase of shares by ISE Holdings. The automatic transfer would be deemed to be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the violative transfer or other event. The Special Trustee of the Charitable Trust would be required to sell the Excess Shares to a person whose ownership of shares is not expected to violate the Ownership Limits, subject to the right of ISE Holdings to repurchase those shares. The proposed changes to the ISE Holdings COI are as follows: 42 • The Exchange proposes to delete the current provisions in Article Fourth, Sections III(a)(ii), III(a)(iii) and III(b)(i) of the ISE Holdings COI that provide that the ISE Holdings Board of Directors shall deliver to the ISE Trust copies of certain written notice and updates thereto currently required under Sections III(a)(ii) and III(a)(iii) of Article FOURTH (i.e., if any Person at any time owns, of record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of the then outstanding Voting Shares). • The Exchange proposes to adopt new Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, which would provide that, notwithstanding any other provisions contained in the ISE Holdings COI, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any shares of capital stock of ISE Holdings (whether such shares are common stock or preferred stock) not entitled to be voted due to the restrictions set forth in Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI (and not waived by the ISE Holdings Board of Directors and approved by the Commission 41 ISE Holdings may also determine to appoint as ‘‘Special Trustee’’ any entity that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons owning Excess Shares, and any successor trustee appointed by ISE Holdings. Currently, the ISE Trust would hold capital stock of ISE Holdings in the event that a person obtains ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of the Ownership Limits or Voting Limits or in the event of a Material Compliance Event. See SR–ISE–2007– 101, supra note 6, for a discussion of the ISE Trust, including the operation thereof. 42 The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the actual Ownership Limits or Voting Limits specified in the current ISE Holdings COI. See Article FOURTH, sections III(a) and III(b) of the ISE Holdings COI. The Exchange proposes to delete certain defined terms from the ISE Holdings COI, such as ‘‘ISE Trust,’’ ‘‘Trust Beneficiary’’ and ‘‘Trustee,’’ and replace them with new defined terms within the ISE Holdings COI, such as ‘‘Charitable Trust,’’ ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ and ‘‘Special Trustee.’’ The Exchange also proposes to renumber certain sections of the ISE Holdings COI to account for proposed new and deleted sections therein. PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 pursuant to Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI), shall not be deemed to be outstanding for purposes of determining a quorum or a minimum vote required for the transaction of any business at any meeting of stockholders of ISE Holdings, including, without limitation, when specified business is to be voted on by a class or a series voting as a class. • As a result of the addition of new Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, the Exchange proposes to renumber current Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) as resulting Article FOURTH, section III(b)(iv). • The Exchange proposes several changes to Article FOURTH, section III(c) of the ISE Holdings COI, which relates to violations of any Ownership Limits or Voting Limits and the treatment of Excess Shares, including the following: • Addition of new text relating to the designation as ‘‘Excess Shares’’ for any shares held in excess of the relevant Ownership Limits; such designation and treatment being effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the purported transfer or other event leading to such Excess Shares.43 • Deletion of current text requiring notification to the ISE Trust upon the occurrence of certain events and the transfer of Voting Shares to the ISE Trust.44 • Addition of new text describing the treatment of ‘‘Excess Shares’’ upon any sale, transfer, assignment or pledge that, if effective would result in any Person, either alone or together with its Related Persons, owning shares in excess of any of the Ownership Limits. Specifically, the Exchange proposes within new Article FOURTH, section III(c)(i) of the ISE Holdings COI that any such purported event shall be void ab initio as to such Excess Shares, and the intended transferee shall acquire no rights in such Excess Shares. Such Excess Shares shall be deemed to have been transferred to ISE Holdings (or to an entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons owning such Excess Shares), as Special Trustee of the Charitable Trust for the exclusive benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary or Beneficiaries.45 43 See resulting Article FOURTH, section III(c). 44 Id. 45 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(ii). The ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ would be one or more organizations described in sections 170(b)(1)(A) or 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. The ‘‘Charitable Trust’’ would be the trust established for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary for E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES • Addition of new text describing the treatment of dividends or other distributions paid with respect to Excess Shares.46 • Addition of new text describing the handling of any distribution of assets received in respect of the Excess Shares in any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or any distribution of the assets of ISE Holdings.47 • Addition of new text describing the authority of the Special Trustee with respect to rescinding as void any votes cast by a purported transferee or holder of Excess Shares as well as recasting of votes in accordance with the desires of the Special Trustee acting for the benefit of ISE Holdings.48 • Addition of new text describing the sale by the Special Trustee, to a Person or Persons designated by the Special Trustee whose ownership of Voting Shares will not violate any Ownership Limit or Voting Limit, of Excess Shares transferred to the Charitable Trust, within 20 days of receiving notice from ISE Holdings that Excess Shares have been so transferred.49 Existing text would be deleted that requires the Trustees of the ISE Trust to use their commercially reasonable efforts to sell the Excess Shares upon receipt of written instructions from the ISE Trust Beneficiary. New text also would be added describing the handling of any proceeds of such a sale. • Addition of new text describing that Excess Shares shall be deemed to have been offered for sale to ISE Holdings on the date of the transaction or event resulting in such Excess Shares.50 • Deletion of current Article FOURTH, section III(c)(v), which currently relates to the ISE Trust Beneficiary’s right to reacquire Excess Shares from the ISE Trust under certain circumstances. The Exchange is not proposing to reinstate all of the ISE Holdings COI text ¨ that existed prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings, as certain of such text would continue to not be applicable, even after the Transaction, given the Exchange’s resulting ownership. For example, prior to ¨ Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings, the ISE Holdings COI contained certain provisions that dealt with the publicly-traded nature of ISE Holdings’ stock. This text was removed from the ISE Holdings COI upon ¨ Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings, as ISE Holdings’ stock ceased to be publicly-traded.51 Therefore, the Exchange is not proposing to reinstate the following provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that existed prior to ¨ Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings relating to: • Regulation 14A under the Act (pertaining to solicitations of proxies). • the treatment of transactions of ISE Holdings stock on or through the facilities of any national securities exchange or national securities association. • inspection of the ISE Holdings accounts and records by ISE Holdings stockholders. • stockholder voting to amend, repeal or adopt provisions of the ISE Holdings COI or the ISE Holdings Bylaws. • stockholder action called at annual or special meetings of stockholders. • nominations for directors and the election thereof. The Exchange also is not proposing to reinstate the ISE Holdings COI text that ¨ existed prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings that related to changes in terminology used throughout the ISE Holdings COI.52 Additionally, provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that authorize shares of capital stock of ISE Holdings have been ¨ amended since Deutsche Borse acquired ownership of ISE Holdings.53 The Exchange does not propose to amend the text of the ISE Holdings COI relating to share authorization. The Exchange also does not propose to reinstate the location or specific wording of text of the ISE Holdings COI that was adjusted ¨ or relocated upon Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings, but that otherwise has the same practical effect and meaning as it did prior to Deutsche ¨ Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings. which ISE Holdings is the trustee. The ‘‘Special Trustee’’ would be ISE Holdings, in its capacity as trustee for the Charitable Trust, any entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons owning Excess Shares, and any successor trustee appointed by ISE Holdings. 46 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(iii). 47 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(iv). 48 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(v). 49 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(vi). 50 See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(vii). 7. U.S. Exchange Holdings COI VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 The Exchange proposes to remove the reference to the Trust Agreement in Article THIRTEENTH of the U.S. 51 See Exhibit 5A to SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6. 52 For example, the ISE Holdings COI currently refers to Delaware General Corporation Law as ‘‘DGCL.’’ The Exchange would not reinstate the prior ‘‘GCL’’ term that was used in the ISE Holdings COI. 53 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73860 (December 17, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 23, 2014) (SR–ISE–2014–44). PO 00000 Frm 00155 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30391 Exchange Holdings COI. As proposed herein, the Trust Agreement will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of the Closing of the Transaction and would be repealed in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange also proposes to retitle the document as the ‘‘Fourth’’ Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Exchange Holdings and update the effective date thereof.54 8. ISE Holdings Bylaws The ISE Holdings COI Voting Limits restrict any person, either alone or together with its related persons, from having voting control, either directly or indirectly, over more than 20% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings. The ISE Holdings COI Ownership Limits restrict any person, either alone or together with its related persons, from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than 40% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings (or in the case of any Exchange member, acting alone or together with its related persons, from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than 20% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings).55 The ISE Holdings COI and the ISE Holdings Bylaws provide that the board of directors of ISE Holdings may waive these voting and ownership restrictions in an amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws if the board makes the following three findings: (1) The waiver will not impair the ability of the Exchange to carry out its functions and responsibilities as an exchange under the Act and the rules thereunder; (2) the waiver is otherwise in the best interests of ISE Holdings, its stockholders, and the Exchange; and (3) the waiver will not impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act. However, the board of directors may not waive these voting and ownership restrictions as they apply to Exchange members. In 54 The proposed, amended U.S. Exchange Holdings COI is attached hereto as Exhibit 5F. Article SIXTEENTH of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange Holdings shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange also proposes to amend the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI to consistently refer to such document as the ‘‘Restated Certificate,’’ which is a defined term therein. 55 See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, section III. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 30392 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES addition, the board of directors may not waive these voting and ownership restrictions if such waiver would result in a person subject to a ‘‘statutory disqualification’’ owning or voting shares above the stated thresholds. Any waiver of these voting and ownership restrictions must be by way of an amendment to the Bylaws approved by the board of directors, which amendment must be approved by the Commission.56 Acting pursuant to this waiver provision, the board of directors of ISE Holdings has approved the amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws to waive the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the Transaction.57 In adopting such amendment, the board of directors of ISE Holdings made the necessary determinations and approved the submission of the Proposed Rule Change to the Commission. In so waiving the applicable voting and ownership restrictions, the board of directors of ISE Holdings has determined, with respect to Nasdaq, that: (i) Such waiver will not impair the ability of ISE Holdings and each Controlled National Securities Exchange, or facility thereof, to carry out its respective functions and responsibilities under the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder; 58 (ii) 56 See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, sections III(a)(i) and III(b)(i). Such amendment to Holdings Bylaws must be filed with and approved by the Commission under section 19(b) of the Act and become effective thereunder. In this regard, section 10.1 of the Bylaws provides that the Bylaws may be amended, added to, rescinded or repealed at any meeting of the Board of Directors of ISE Holdings or meeting of the stockholders. With respect to each national securities exchange controlled, directly or indirectly, by ISE Holdings (the ‘‘Controlled National Securities Exchanges’’), or facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision of the Bylaws of ISE Holdings shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to the board of directors of each Controlled National Securities Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be effective, under section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may be. 57 The proposed, amended ISE Holdings Bylaws are attached hereto as Exhibit 5G. The proposed amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws would also clarify that Eurex Global Derivatives AG or ‘‘EGD,’’ which is referenced in section 11.2 of the ISE Holdings Bylaws, ceased to be an Upstream Owner of the Exchange as a result of a prior transaction that did not require an amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73530 (November 5, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 17, 2014) (SR–ISE–2014–44). 58 For example, the Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 such waiver is otherwise in the best interests of ISE Holdings, its stockholders, and each Controlled National Securities Exchange, or facility thereof; 59 (iii) such waiver will not impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act; 60 (iv) neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons (as that term is defined in the ISE Holdings COI) are subject to any applicable ‘‘statutory disqualification’’ (within the meaning of section 3(a)(39) of the Act); and (v) neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons is a member (as such term is defined in section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Act) of such Controlled National Securities Exchange. The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. In addition, the Transaction will not impair the ability of the Exchange’s, or any facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and responsibilities under the Act and will not impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act. The Exchange therefore seeks approval of the waiver described herein with respect to the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the Transaction. Summary The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. The Transaction will not impair the ability of ISE Holdings, the Exchange, or any facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and responsibilities changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange is not proposing any amendments to its trading or regulatory rules at this time relating to the Transaction. 59 For example, the Transaction will produce a stronger and more efficient infrastructure that will have an improved ability to provide innovative products and services. 60 For example, the Commission will continue to have plenary regulatory authority over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as well as jurisdiction over the Exchange’s direct and indirect owners with respect to activities related to the Exchange. The Commission will continue to have appropriate oversight tools to ensure that the Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act with respect to the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their directors (where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the extent they are involved in the activities of the Exchange. PO 00000 Frm 00156 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 under the Act. Moreover, the Transaction will not impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act with respect to the Exchange. As such, the Commission’s plenary regulatory authority over the Exchange will not be affected by the approval of this Proposed Rule Change. The Exchange is requesting approval by the Commission of changes proposed herein in order to allow the Transaction to take place. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,61 in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(1) of the Act,62 in particular, in that it enables the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is designed to enable the Exchange to continue to have the authority and ability to effectively fulfill its self-regulatory duties pursuant to the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. Thus, the Commission will continue to have plenary regulatory authority over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as well as jurisdiction over the Exchange’s direct and indirect owners with respect to activities related to the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is consistent with and will facilitate an ownership structure that will continue to provide the Commission with appropriate oversight tools to ensure that the Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act with respect to the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their directors (where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the extent they are involved in the activities of the Exchange. The Exchange also believes that this Proposed Rule Change furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) 63 of the Act because the Proposed Rule Change would be consistent with and facilitate a governance and regulatory structure that is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 61 15 U.S.C. 78s(b). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 63 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 62 15 E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the Proposed Rule Change will continue to provide the Commission and the Exchange with access to necessary information that will allow the Exchange to efficiently and effectively enforce compliance with the Act, as well as allow the Commission to provide proper oversight, which will ultimately promote just and equitable principles of trade and protect investors. Approval of this Proposed Rule Change will enable ISE Holdings to continue its operations and the Exchange to continue its orderly discharge of regulatory duties to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In addition, the Exchange expects that the Transaction will facilitate efficiencies and innovation for clients and efficient, transparent and wellregulated markets for issuers and clients, thus removing impediments to, and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. The Transaction will benefit investors, the market as a whole, and shareholders by, among other things, enhancing competition among securities venues and reducing costs. In particular, the Transaction will contribute to streamlined and efficient operations, thereby intensifying competition for transaction order flow with other exchange and non-exchange trading centers, as well as potentially in other areas, such as proprietary market data products and listings. This enhanced level of competition among trading centers will benefit investors through new or more competitive product offerings and, ultimately, lower costs. Furthermore, the Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. Therefore, the Exchange believes that it will continue to satisfy the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange. The Exchange believes it is consistent with the Act to allow Nasdaq to become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. Neither Nasdaq nor any of its related persons is subject to any statutory disqualification or is a Member of the Exchange. Moreover, the Nasdaq governing documents include certain provisions designed to maintain the independence of the Exchange’s selfregulatory functions. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that Nasdaq’s acquisition of ultimate ownership and exercise of voting control of the Exchange will not impair the ability of the Commission or the Exchange to discharge their respective responsibilities under the Act. Although Nasdaq will not carry out regulatory functions, its activities with respect to the operation of the Exchange must be consistent with, and not interfere with, the Exchange’s selfregulatory obligations. Nasdaq’s governing documents include certain provisions that are designed to maintain the independence of the Exchange’s self-regulatory functions, enable the Exchange to operate in a manner that complies with the U.S. federal securities laws, including the objectives and requirements of sections 6(b) and 19(g) of the Act,64 and facilitate the ability of the Exchange and the Commission to fulfill their regulatory and oversight obligations under the Act. For example, the Nasdaq governing documents provide that Nasdaq will comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and the Exchange. Also, each board member, officer, and employee of Nasdaq, in discharging his or her responsibilities, shall comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, cooperate with the Commission, and cooperate with the Exchange. In discharging his or her responsibilities as a board member of Nasdaq, each such member must, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, take into consideration the effect that Nasdaq’s actions would have on the ability of the Exchange to carry out its responsibilities under the Act. In addition, Nasdaq, its board members, officers and employees shall give due regard to the preservation 64 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g). Frm 00157 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30393 of the independence of the selfregulatory function of the Exchange. Further, Nasdaq (along with its respective board members, officers, and employees) and U.S. Exchange Holdings agree to keep confidential, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, all confidential information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of the Exchange, including, but not limited to, confidential information regarding disciplinary matters, trading data, trading practices, and audit information, contained in the books and records of the Exchange and not use such information for any non-regulatory purposes. In addition, Nasdaq’s books and records relating to the activities of the Exchange will at all times be made available for, and books and records of U.S. Exchange Holdings will be subject at all times to, inspection and copying by the Commission and the Exchange. Books and records of U.S. Exchange Holdings related to the activities of the Exchange also will continue to be maintained within the U.S. Moreover, for so long as Nasdaq directly or indirectly controls the Exchange, the books, records, officers, directors (or equivalent), and employees of Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books, records, officers, directors, and employees of the Exchange. To the extent involved in the activities of the Exchange, Nasdaq, its board members, officers, and employees irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the Commission for purposes of any action arising out of, or relating to, the activities of the Exchange. Likewise, U.S. Exchange Holdings, its officers and directors, and employees whose principal place of business and residence is outside of the U.S., to the extent such directors, officers, or employees are involved in the activities of the Exchange, irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the Commission for purposes of any action arising out of, or relating to, the activities of the Exchange. The Nasdaq governing documents, the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, and the U.S. Exchange Holdings Bylaws require that any change thereto must be submitted to the Exchange’s Board. If such change must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission under section 19 of the Act and the rules thereunder, then such change shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission. This requirement to submit changes to the Exchange’s Board continues for so long as Nasdaq or U.S. Exchange E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 30394 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices Holdings, as applicable, directly or indirectly, control the Exchange. ¨ As Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the Exchange upon the Closing of the Transaction, the Exchange believes that its proposal that ¨ the resolutions of Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act. The purpose for which the ISE Trust was formed will not be relevant after the Closing of the Transaction, given that the Exchange will no longer have NonU.S. Upstream Owners and that the Exchange’s current and resulting U.S. upstream owners’ governing documents provide for similar protections (e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange believes that its proposal that the Trust Agreement will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act. Given the Exchange’s proposal to repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE Trust, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the ISE Holdings COI are consistent with the Act. The proposed changes would delete provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that will no longer be relevant and would reinstate certain provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that were removed upon introduction of the provisions relating to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,65 the Exchange believes that the Proposed Rule Change would not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Indeed, the Exchange believes that the Proposed Rule Change will enhance competition among intermarket trading venues, as the Exchange believes that the Transaction will produce a stronger and more efficient infrastructure that will have an improved ability to provide innovative products and services. Moreover, the Exchange will continue to conduct regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) of the type it currently conducts, but will be able to do so in a 65 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 more efficient manner to the benefit of its Members. The Exchange’s conclusion that the Proposed Rule Change would not result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act is consistent with the Commission’s prior conclusions about similar combinations involving multiple exchanges in a single corporate family.66 In this regard, the Exchange notes that the Exchange, and its affiliates ISE and ISE Mercury, function only as options trading markets—they do not function as equity trading markets or as clearing agencies, as do certain of Nasdaq’s existing subsidiaries. The Exchange believes that there is considerable support for a finding that the Transaction is consistent with the Act with respect to competition. 14 exchanges currently compete for options trading business. Exchanges compete on technology, market model, trading venue, fees and fee structure. Additionally, low switching costs allow customers to easily move to another exchange, which customers do regularly, as reflected in constantly varying market shares among the existing exchange operators. In addition, the Commission has approved several, new registered options exchanges in recent history, which highlights an increase in competition in the market for listed options trading.67 The Exchange believes that the Transaction will not change the competitive landscape for listed options 66 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66071 (Dec. 29, 2011), 77 FR 521 (Jan. 05, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2011–107 and SR–NSX–2011–14); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324 (Aug. 7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (Aug. 12, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008– 02; SR–BSE–2008–23; SR–BSE–2008–25; SR– BSECC–2008–01); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (Feb. 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (Mar. 06, 2006) (SR–NYSE–2005–77); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71449 (Jan. 30, 2014), 79 FR 6961 (Feb. 05, 2014) (SR–EDGA–2013–34; SR–EDGX– 2013–43); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR–EDGA–2011–34; SR–EDGX– 2011–33; SR–ISE–2011–69; SR–NYSE–2011–51; SR–NYSEAmex–2011–78; SR–NYSEArca–2011– 72). 67 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76998 (January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066 (February 4, 2016) (Order approving application for exchange registration of ISE Mercury, LLC); 75650 (August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015) (Order approving rules governing the trading of options on the EDGX Options Market); 70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (Order approving application for exchange registration of Topaz Exchange, LLC (n/k/a ISE Gemini, LLC)); 68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065 (December 7, 2012) (Order approving application for exchange registration of Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC); 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (Order approving rules governing the trading of options on the BATS Options Exchange). PO 00000 Frm 00158 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 trading and the changes proposed herein are consistent with other recent Commission approvals. For example, a similar proposed combination of ¨ Deutsche Borse and NYSE Euronext in 2011 received Commission approval and would have resulted in a combined greater than 40% market share of listed options volume among its three, respective options exchanges (based on 2010 data).68 Similarly, as a result of the Transaction, the options exchanges owned by Nasdaq would account for approximately 41% aggregate market share of listed options volume. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the publication date of this notice or within such longer period (1) as the Commission may designate up to 45 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (2) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve such Proposed Rule Change; or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the Proposed Rule Change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– ISEGemini–2016–05 on the subject line. 68 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR–EDGA–2011–34; SR–EDGX–2011–33; SR–ISE–2011–69; SR–NYSE–2011–51; SR– NYSEAmex–2011–78; SR–NYSEArca–2011–72). E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISEGemini–2016–05. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– ISEGemini–2016–05, and should be submitted on or before June 6, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.69 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–11406 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am] asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 69 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:48 May 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–77798; File No. SR–FINRA– 2016–010] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt FINRA Rule 4554, Alternative Trading Systems—Recording and Reporting Requirements of Order and Execution Information for NMS Stocks May 10, 2016. I. Introduction On February 29, 2016, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to require alternative trading systems (‘‘ATSs’’) to submit additional order information to FINRA. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 7, 2016.3 The Commission received one comment letter on the proposal.4 On April 22, 2016, FINRA responded to the comment letter.5 This order approves the proposed rule change. II. Description of the Proposal FINRA proposed Rule 4554 to impose additional reporting requirements on trading venues that have filed a Form ATS with the Commission.6 The proposal is intended to enhance FINRA’s order-based surveillance by requiring ATSs to report additional ATS-specific order information for NMS stocks.7 While ATSs submit order information to FINRA under the Order Audit Trail System (‘‘OATS’’) rules,8 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77269 (March 1, 2016), 81 FR 11851 (March 7, 2016) (‘‘Notice’’). On April 15, 2016, the Commission extended the time period for Commission action on the proposed rule change until June 3, 2016. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77635 (April 15, 2016), 81 FR 23536 (April 21, 2016). 4 See Letter from Theodore R. Lazo, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’), dated April 1, 2016 (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’). 5 See Letter from Andrew Madar, Associate General Counsel, FINRA, dated April 22, 2016 (‘‘FINRA Response Letter’’). 6 See 17 CFR 242.300(a). 7 See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47). 8 For example, upon receipt of an order, a member must report the number of shares to which the order applies, any limit or stop price prescribed in the order, special handling requests, and the time at which the order is received. See FINRA Rule 7440(b). Upon the modification or execution of an 2 17 PO 00000 Frm 00159 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30395 there is order information not currently required to be reported to OATS, such as order re-pricing events and order display and reserve size information, which FINRA needs so that it can more fully reconstruct an ATS’s order book and perform certain order-based surveillance. Specifically, proposed Rule 4554 sets forth four categories of reporting requirements: (1) Data to be reported by all ATSs at the time of order receipt; (2) data to be reported by all ATSs at the time of order execution; (3) data to be reported by ATSs that display subscriber orders; and (4) data to be reported by ATSs that are registered as ADF Trading Centers. The proposed requirements would apply to order and execution information for NMS stocks. ATSs would be required to report this information to FINRA consistent with current OATS reporting requirements. Reporting Requirements for Receipt of Orders Proposed Rule 4554 would require, among other things, each ATS to indicate on all orders received whether it displays subscriber orders outside of the ATS (other than to ATS employees).9 This information will enable FINRA to distinguish between ATSs that display orders outside the ATS (‘‘display ATS’’), either to subscribers or through consolidated quote data, and ATSs that do not display orders outside the ATS (‘‘nondisplay ATS’’).10 A display ATS would also be required to indicate whether the order book is displayed to subscribers only, or distributed for publication in the consolidated quotation data. Each ATS would also be required to indicate whether it is an ADF Trading Center as defined in Rule 6220, whether a specific order can be routed away from the ATS for execution, and whether there are any counter-party restrictions on the order. ATSs would also be required to provide FINRA with a order, the member must report the time of modification or execution, whether the order was fully or partially executed, the number of unexecuted shares remaining if the order was only partially executed, and the execution price. See FINRA Rule 7440(d). 9 The proposed requirements apply to any alternative trading system, as defined in Rule 300(a)(1) of SEC Regulation ATS, that has filed a Form ATS with the SEC and is subject to FINRA’s OATS and equity trade reporting rules. See 17 CFR 242.300(a)(1). For purposes of this rule, the term ‘‘order’’ includes a broker-dealer’s proprietary quotes that are transmitted to an ATS. 10 If an ATS meets the applicable volume thresholds, it is required to make its best bid and best offer available for publication in the consolidated quotation data. See 17 CFR 242.301(b)(3). E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30386-30395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77795; File No. SR-ISE Gemini-2016-05]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing 
of Proposed Rule Change Relating to a Corporate Transaction Involving 
Its Indirect Parent

May 10, 2016.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 28, 2016 ISE Gemini, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``ISE 
Gemini'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is hereby filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change (the ``Proposed Rule 
Change'') in connection with a proposed business transaction (the 
``Transaction'') involving the Exchange's ultimate, indirect, non-U.S. 
upstream owners, Deutsche B[ouml]rse AG (``Deutsche B[ouml]rse'') and 
Eurex Frankfurt AG (``Eurex Frankfurt''), and Nasdaq, Inc. 
(``Nasdaq''). Nasdaq is the parent company of The NASDAQ Stock Market 
LLC (``NASDAQ Exchange''), NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx Exchange''), NASDAQ 
BX, Inc. (``BX Exchange''), Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation 
(``BSECC'') and Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia 
(``SCCP'').\3\ Upon completion of the Transaction (the ``Closing''), 
the Exchange's indirect parent company, U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. 
(``U.S. Exchange Holdings''), will become a direct subsidiary of 
Nasdaq. The Exchange will therefore become an indirect subsidiary of 
Nasdaq and, in addition to the Exchange's current affiliation with 
International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') and ISE Mercury, LLC 
(``ISE Mercury''), an affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX 
Exchange, BSECC and SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. 
Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58179 (July 17, 
2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-31); 58324 (August 
7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-
2008-23; SR-BSE-2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01).
    \4\ The Exchange's current affiliates, ISE and ISE Mercury, have 
submitted nearly identical proposed rule changes. See SR-ISE-2016-11 
and SR-ISEMercury-2016-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to effect the Transaction, the Exchange hereby seeks the 
Commission's approval of the following: (i) That certain corporate 
resolutions that were previously established by entities that will 
cease to be non-U.S. upstream owners of the Exchange after the 
Transaction will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange upon 
Closing; (ii) that certain governing documents of Nasdaq will be 
considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing; (iii) that the Third 
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the ``Trust Agreement'') that 
currently exists among International Securities Exchange Holdings, Inc. 
(``ISE Holdings''), U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as 
defined therein) with respect to the ``ISE Trust'' will cease to be 
considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing and, thereafter, that the 
parties to the Trust Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate 
steps necessary to repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE 
Trust; (iv) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated 
Certificate of Incorporation of ISE Holdings (``ISE Holdings COI'') to 
eliminate provisions relating to the Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust 
and, in this respect, to reinstate certain text of the ISE Holdings COI 
that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings; 
(v) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of ISE 
Holdings (the ``ISE Holdings Bylaws'') to waive certain voting and 
ownership restrictions in the ISE Holdings COI to permit Nasdaq to 
indirectly own 100% of the outstanding

[[Page 30387]]

common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the 
Transaction; and (vi) to amend and restate the Third Amended and 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Exchange Holdings (``U.S. 
Exchange Holdings COI'') to eliminate references therein to the Trust 
Agreement.
    The Exchange requests that the Proposed Rule Change become 
operative at the Closing of the Transaction. The text of the proposed 
rule change is available at the Commission's Public Reference Room and 
on the Exchange's Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange submits this Proposed Rule Change to seek the 
Commission's approval of various changes to the organizational and 
governance documents of the Exchange's current owners and related 
actions that are necessary in connection with the Closing of the 
Transaction, as described below. The Exchange will continue to conduct 
its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market 
and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any 
changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. 
The Exchange is not proposing any amendments to its trading or 
regulatory rules at this time relating to the Transaction.\5\ The 
Exchange would continue to be registered as a national securities 
exchange, with separate rules, membership rosters, and listings, 
distinct from the rules, membership rosters, and listings of NASDAQ 
Exchange, Phlx Exchange and BX Exchange as well as from its current 
affiliates, ISE and ISE Mercury. Neither the Exchange nor its current 
affiliates engage in clearing securities transactions, nor would they 
do so after the Transaction. Additionally, the Exchange would continue 
to be a separate self-regulatory organization (``SRO'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ If the Exchange determines to make any such changes, it will 
seek the approval of the Commission only after the approval of this 
Proposed Rule Change to the extent required by the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), the Commission's rules 
thereunder, or the Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Current Ownership Structure of the Exchange
    On December 17, 2007, ISE Holdings, the sole, direct parent of the 
Exchange, became a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Exchange 
Holdings.\6\ U.S. Exchange Holdings is 85% directly owned by Eurex 
Frankfurt and 15% directly owned by Deutsche B[ouml]rse. Eurex 
Frankfurt is a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Deutsche 
B[ouml]rse.\7\ Deutsche B[ouml]rse therefore owns 100% of U.S. Exchange 
Holdings through its aggregate direct and indirect ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56955 (December 13, 
2007), 72 FR 71979 (December 19, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-101).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66834 (April 19, 
2012), 77 FR 24752 (April 25, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-21). Each of 
Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt is referred to as a ``Non-
U.S. Upstream Owner'' and collectively as the ``Non-U.S. Upstream 
Owners.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Transaction
    On March 9, 2016, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the ``Agreement'') 
was entered into among Deutsche B[ouml]rse, Eurex Frankfurt and Nasdaq. 
Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Agreement, at the Closing, 
Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will sell, transfer and deliver 
to Nasdaq, and Nasdaq will purchase, the capital stock of U.S. Exchange 
Holdings.
3. Post-Closing Ownership Structure of the Exchange
    As a result of the Transaction, Nasdaq will directly own 100% of 
the equity interest of U.S. Exchange Holdings. U.S. Exchange Holdings 
will remain the sole, direct owner of ISE Holdings. ISE Holdings will 
remain the sole, direct owner of the Exchange. The Exchange will 
therefore become an indirect subsidiary of Nasdaq and Nasdaq will 
become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. The Exchange will become an 
affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and 
SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. As a result of the 
Transaction, Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be 
owners of the Exchange. The Exchange will therefore cease to have any 
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners. The Transaction will not have any effect on 
ISE Holdings' direct ownership of the Exchange. However, consummation 
of the Transaction is subject to approval of this Proposed Rule Change 
by the Commission, as described below.
4. Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions
    Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt, as the Non-U.S. Upstream 
Owners of the Exchange, have previously taken appropriate steps to 
incorporate provisions regarding ownership, jurisdiction, books and 
records, and other issues related to their control of the Exchange. 
Specifically, each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners has adopted 
resolutions (``Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions''), which were 
previously approved by the Commission, to incorporate these concepts 
with respect to itself, as well as its board members, officers, 
employees, and agents (as applicable), to the extent that they are 
involved in the activities of the Exchange.\8\ For example, the 
resolution of each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners provides that it 
shall comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and 
regulations thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and with 
the Exchange. In addition, the resolution of each of such Non-U.S. 
Upstream Owners provides that the board members, including each person 
who becomes a board member, would so consent to comply and cooperate 
and the particular Non-U.S. Upstream Owner would take reasonable steps 
to cause its officers, employees, and agents to also comply and 
cooperate, to the extent that he or she is involved in the activities 
of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70050 (July 26, 
2013), 78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (File No. 10-209) (Order 
Approving Topaz Exchange, LLC for Registration as a National 
Securities Exchange). The Exchange was originally named ``Topaz 
Exchange, LLC.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b) of the Act,\9\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\10\ require 
an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the Commission. Although the 
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners are not SROs, the Non-U.S. Upstream Owner 
Resolutions have previously been filed with the Commission as stated 
policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore 
are considered rules of the Exchange.\11\ As Deutsche B[ouml]rse and 
Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the 
Exchange after the Transaction, the Exchange proposes that the 
resolutions of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex

[[Page 30388]]

Frankfurt will cease to be stated policies, practices, or 
interpretations of the Exchange and, therefore, will cease to be 
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the 
Closing date of the Transaction.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \11\ See File No. 10-209, supra note 8.
    \12\ The ``Form of German Parent Corporate Resolutions'' is 
attached hereto as Exhibit 5A. As referenced above, resolutions in 
relation to board members, officers, employees, and agents (as 
applicable) of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt also would 
cease accordingly. Resolution 11 provides that, notwithstanding any 
provision of the resolutions, before: (a) Any amendment to or repeal 
of any provision of this or any of the resolutions; or (b) any 
action that would have the effect of amending or repealing any 
provision of the resolutions shall be effective, the same shall be 
submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same 
must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission 
before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and 
the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be 
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the 
Commission, as the case may be. In addition, Deutsche B[ouml]rse, 
Eurex Frankfurt, U.S. Exchange Holdings, ISE Holdings, and ISE 
previously became parties to an agreement to provide for adequate 
funding for the Exchange's regulatory responsibilities. The Exchange 
subsequently became a party to the agreement along with ISE Mercury. 
This agreement will be terminated upon the Closing of the 
Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Nasdaq Governing Documents
    Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange upon the 
Closing of the Transaction. As described above, section 19(b) of the 
Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule 
changes with the Commission. Although the Exchange's existing U.S. 
upstream owners are not SROs, their governing documents have previously 
been filed with the Commission as stated policies, practices, or 
interpretations of the Exchange and therefore are considered rules of 
the Exchange.\13\ The Exchange proposes that the Nasdaq Amended and 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (``Nasdaq COI'') and the Nasdaq 
Bylaws (``Nasdaq Bylaws, and together with the Nasdaq COI, the ``Nasdaq 
governing documents'') will become stated policies, practices, or 
interpretations of the Exchange as of the Closing and, therefore, will 
be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to 
the Closing date of the Transaction.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See File No. 10-209, supra note 8.
    \14\ The Nasdaq COI dated January 24, 2014 is attached hereto as 
Exhibit 5B along with subsequent amendments thereto dated November 
17, 2014 and September 8, 2015 and the Certificate of Elimination of 
the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dated January 27, 2014. The 
Nasdaq Bylaws are attached hereto as Exhibit 5C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Nasdaq Bylaws contain certain provisions regarding ownership, 
jurisdiction, books and records, and other issues, with respect to 
Nasdaq, as well as its board members, officers, employees, and agents 
(as applicable), relating to Nasdaq's control of any ``Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiary'' (i.e., any subsidiary of Nasdaq that is an SRO as defined 
under section 3(a)(26) of the Act).\15\ The Exchange would be a ``Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary'' of Nasdaq upon the Closing of the Transaction. 
The provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws are comparable to the provisions of 
the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners Resolutions, including in the following 
manner:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Giving due regard to the preservation of the independence 
of the self-regulatory function of each of Nasdaq's Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiaries.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(a) (Self-Regulatory Organization 
Functions of the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Maintaining the confidentiality of all books and records 
of each Self-Regulatory Subsidiary reflecting confidential information 
pertaining to the self-regulatory function of such Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiary (including but not limited to disciplinary matters, trading 
data, trading practices and audit information) that comes into Nasdaq's 
possession, which shall not be used for any non-regulatory purposes; 
making such books and records available for inspection and copying by 
the Commission; and maintaining such books and records relating to each 
Self-Regulatory Subsidiary in the United States.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     To the extent they are related to the activities of a 
Self-Regulatory Subsidiary, the books, records, premises, officers, 
Directors, and employees of Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books, 
records, premises, officers, directors, and employees of such Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of, and subject to oversight 
pursuant to, the Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Compliance by Nasdaq with the U.S. federal securities laws 
and the rules and regulations thereunder, cooperation by Nasdaq with 
the Commission and Nasdaq's Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries, and 
reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its agents to cooperate 
with the Commission and, where applicable, the Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiaries pursuant to their regulatory authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.2(a) (Cooperation with the 
Commission). The officers, Directors, and employees of Nasdaq, by 
virtue of their acceptance of such position, shall be deemed to 
agree to cooperate with the Commission and each Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiary in respect of the Commission's oversight responsibilities 
regarding the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries and the self-regulatory 
functions and responsibilities of the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries. 
Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.2(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Consent by Nasdaq and its officers, Directors, and 
employees to the jurisdiction of the United States federal courts, the 
Commission, and each Self-Regulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of any 
suit, action or proceeding pursuant to the United States federal 
securities laws, and the rules and regulations thereunder, arising out 
of, or relating to, the activities of any Self-Regulatory 
Subsidiary.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.3 (Consent to Jurisdiction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its current 
and future officers, Directors, and employees, to consent in writing to 
the applicability to them of certain provisions of the Nasdaq Bylaws, 
as applicable, with respect to their activities related to any Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.4 (Further Assurances).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Approval by the Commission under section 19 of the Act 
prior to any resolution of the Nasdaq Board to approve an exemption for 
any person from the ownership limitations of the Nasdaq COI.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5 (Board Action with Respect to 
Voting Limitations of the Certificate of Incorporation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Filing with, or filing with and approval by, the 
Commission (as the case may be) under section 19 of the Act prior to 
amending the Nasdaq COI or the Nasdaq Bylaws.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.6 (Amendments to the Certificate 
of Incorporation); Nasdaq Bylaws Section 11.3 (Review by Self-
Regulatory Subsidiaries).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws 
should minimize the potential that a person could improperly interfere 
with, or restrict the ability of, the Commission or the Exchange to 
effectively carry out their regulatory oversight responsibilities under 
the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The U.S. Exchange Holdings COI also includes similar 
provisions, including that U.S. Exchange Holdings will take 
reasonable steps necessary to cause ISE Holdings to be in compliance 
with the ``Ownership Limit'' and the ``Voting Limit.'' See U.S. 
Exchange Holdings COI, Articles TENTH through SIXTEENTH. The U.S. 
Exchange Holdings COI provides that U.S. Exchange Holdings will 
notify the Exchange's Board if any ``Person,'' either alone or 
together with its ``Related Persons,'' at any time owns (whether by 
acquisition or by a change in the number of shares outstanding) of 
record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, 10%, 15%, 
20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, or 40% or more of the then outstanding shares of 
U.S. Exchange Holdings. See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6, at 71981.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, and similar to the ISE Holdings COI, the Nasdaq COI 
imposes limits on direct and indirect changes in control, which are 
designed to prevent any shareholder from exercising undue control over 
the operation of its SRO subsidiaries and to ensure that its SRO 
subsidiaries and the Commission are

[[Page 30389]]

able to carry out their regulatory obligations under the Act. 
Specifically, no person who beneficially owns shares of common stock, 
preferred stock, or notes of Nasdaq in excess of 5% of the securities 
generally entitled to vote may vote the shares in excess of 5%.\25\ 
This limitation would mitigate the potential for any Nasdaq shareholder 
to exercise undue control over the operations of the Exchange, and it 
facilitates the Exchange's and the Commission's ability to carry out 
their regulatory obligations under the Act. The Nasdaq Board may 
approve exemptions from the 5% voting limitation for any person that is 
not a broker-dealer, an affiliate of a broker-dealer, or a person 
subject to a statutory disqualification under section 3(a)(39) of the 
Act,\26\ provided that the Nasdaq Board also determines that granting 
such exemption would be consistent with the self-regulatory obligations 
of its SRO subsidiary.\27\ Further, any such exemption from the 5% 
voting limitation would not be effective until approved by the 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Act.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Article FOURTH, Section C of the Nasdaq COI.
    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39).
    \27\ See Article FOURTH, section C.6. of the Nasdaq COI. 
Specifically, the Nasdaq Board must determine that granting such 
exemption would (1) not reasonably be expected to diminish the 
quality of, or public confidence in, Nasdaq or the other operations 
of Nasdaq, on the ability to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices and on investors and the public, and (2) promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to an facilitating transactions 
in securities or assist in the removal of impediments to or 
perfection of the mechanisms for a free and open market and a 
national market system.
    \28\ See Section 12.5 of the Nasdaq Bylaws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Trust Agreement \29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ The Trust Agreement exists among ISE Holdings, U.S. 
Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as defined therein). By its 
terms, the Trust Agreement originally related solely to ISE 
Holdings' ownership of ISE, and not to any other national securities 
exchange that ISE Holdings might control, directly or indirectly. In 
2010, the Commission approved proposed rule changes that revised the 
Trust Agreement to replace references to ISE with references to any 
Controlled National Securities Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act 
Release Nos. 59135 (December 22, 2008), 73 FR 79954 (December 30, 
2008) (SR-ISE-2008-85) and 61498 (February 4, 2010), 75 FR 7299 
(February 18, 2010) (SR-ISE-2009-90); see also ISE Trust Agreement, 
Articles I and II, Sections 1.1 and 2.6. Thus, the ISE Trust 
Agreement also applies to ISE Gemini and ISE Mercury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ISE Holdings COI currently contains certain ownership limits 
(``Ownership Limits'') and voting limits (``Voting Limits'') with 
respect to the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings.\30\ The Trust 
Agreement was entered into in 2007 to provide for an automatic transfer 
of ISE Holdings shares to a trust (the ``ISE Trust'') if a Person \31\ 
were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in 
excess of these Ownership Limits and Voting Limits, through ownership 
of one of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners, without obtaining the approval 
of the Commission. In this regard, the Trust Agreement serves four 
general purposes: (i) To accept, hold and dispose of Trust Shares \32\ 
on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein; (ii) to 
determine whether a Material Compliance Event \33\ has occurred or is 
continuing; (iii) to determine whether the occurrence and continuation 
of a Material Compliance Event requires the exercise of the Call 
Option; \34\ and (iv) to transfer Deposited Shares from the Trust to 
the Trust Beneficiary \35\ as provided in section 4.2(h) therein. The 
ISE Trust, and corresponding Trust Agreement, is the mechanism by which 
the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in the ISE Holdings COI 
currently would be protected in the event that a Non-U.S. Upstream 
Owner purportedly transfers any related ownership or voting rights 
other than in accordance with the ISE Holdings COI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Article FOURTH, Section III of the ISE Holdings COI.
    \31\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6. Under the Trust 
Agreement, the term ``Person'' means any individual, corporation 
(including not-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited 
liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association, 
organization, government or any agency or political subdivision 
thereof, or any other entity of any kind or nature.
    \32\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Trust Shares'' means 
either Excess Shares or Deposited Shares, or both, as the case may 
be. The term ``Excess Shares'' means that a Person obtained an 
ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of certain 
ownership and voting restrictions pursuant to Article FOURTH of the 
ISE Holdings COI, through, for example, ownership of one of the Non-
U.S. Upstream Owners or U.S. Exchange Holdings, without obtaining 
the approval of the Commission. The term ``Deposited Shares'' means 
shares that are transferred to the Trust pursuant to the Trust's 
exercise of the Call Option.
    \33\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Material Compliance 
Event'' means, with respect to a Non-U.S. Upstream Owner, any state 
of facts, development, event, circumstance, condition, occurrence or 
effect that results in the failure of any of the Non-U.S. Upstream 
Owners to adhere to their respective commitments under the 
resolutions (i.e., as referenced in note 7) in any material respect.
    \34\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Call Option'' means 
the option granted by the Trust Beneficiary to the Trust to call the 
Voting Shares as set forth in Section 4.2 therein.
    \35\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Trust Beneficiary'' 
means U.S. Exchange Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the 
Commission. Although the ISE Trust is not an SRO, the Trust Agreement 
has previously been filed with the Commission as stated policies, 
practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore is 
considered rules of the Exchange.\36\ The purpose for which the ISE 
Trust was formed will not be relevant after the Closing of the 
Transaction, given that the Exchange will no longer have Non-U.S. 
Upstream Owners and that the Exchange's current and resulting U.S. 
upstream owners' governing documents provide for similar protections 
(e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws 
Section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes that the Trust 
Agreement will cease to be stated policies, practices, or 
interpretations of the Exchange and, therefore, will cease to be 
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the 
Closing date of the Transaction.\37\ The Exchange also proposes that, 
as of the Closing of the Transaction, the parties to the Trust 
Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate steps necessary to 
repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See File No. 10-209, supra note 8.
    \37\ The current Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 
5D. Section 8.2 of the Trust Agreement provides, in part, that, for 
so long as ISE Holdings controls, directly or indirectly, the 
Exchange, before any amendment or repeal of any provision of the 
Trust Agreement shall be effective, such amendment or repeal shall 
be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, as 
applicable, and if such amendment or repeal must be filed with or 
filed with and approved by the Commission under Section 19 of the 
Act and the rules promulgated thereunder before such amendment or 
repeal may be effectuated, then such amendment or repeal shall not 
be effectuated until filed with or filed with and approved by the 
Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange notes that, according 
to the terms of the Trust Agreement, sections 6.1 and 6.2 thereof, 
which relate to limits on disclosure of confidential information and 
certain permitted disclosure, will survive the termination of the 
Trust Agreement for a period of ten years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. ISE Holdings COI
    The ISE Holdings COI was amended in 2007 in relation to the 
ownership of ISE by Deutsche B[ouml]rse.\38\ At that time, provisions 
were added to the ISE Holdings COI relating to the ISE Trust to provide 
for an automatic transfer of ISE Holdings' shares to the ISE Trust if a 
Person were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings 
in excess of Voting Limits and Ownership Limits, without obtaining the 
approval of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the Exchange is proposing that the Trust 
Agreement will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a 
date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.

[[Page 30390]]

Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to remove provisions relating to the 
Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust from the ISE Holdings COI.\39\ The 
Exchange proposes to reinstate certain provisions of the ISE Holdings 
COI that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE 
Holdings that were removed upon introduction of the provisions relating 
to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ The proposed, amended ISE Holdings COI is attached hereto 
as Exhibit 5E. Capitalized terms used to describe the ISE Holdings 
COI that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings 
prescribed in the ISE Holdings COI. Article FOURTEENTH of the ISE 
Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange Holdings 
shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or facility 
thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision of the 
ISE Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to 
the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must be 
filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the 
same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules 
promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until 
filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the 
case may be.
    \40\ See, e.g., Exhibit 5A to SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6. See 
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51029 (January 12, 2005), 
70 FR 3233 (January 21, 2005) (SR-ISE-2004-29), through which ISE, 
which was organized as a corporation at that time (i.e., ``ISE, 
Inc.''), amended its Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution 
at that time in connection with ISE's then-contemplated initial 
public offering. ISE subsequently reorganized into a holding company 
structure, whereby it became a limited liability company, as it is 
so organized currently, and whereby ISE Holdings became the sole 
owner of ISE. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53705 (April 
21, 2006), 71 FR 25260 (April 28, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-04). As a 
result, and at the time of the reorganization, ISE eliminated the 
``ISE, Inc.'' Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution. The ISE 
Holdings COI and ISE Holdings Bylaws were introduced at that time 
and included substantially the same ownership and voting limitations 
that had been contained in the ISE, Inc. Certificate of 
Incorporation and Constitution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The changes to the ISE Holdings COI proposed herein would describe 
the corrective treatment of ``Excess Shares'' (i.e., any sale, 
transfer, assignment or pledge that, if effective would result in any 
Person, either alone or together with its Related Persons, owning 
shares in excess of any of the Ownership Limits). The proposed changes 
would apply corrective procedures if any Person, alone or together with 
its Related Persons, purports to sell, transfer, assign or pledge any 
shares of ISE Holdings stock in violation of the Ownership Limits. 
Specifically, any such sale, transfer, assignment or pledge would be 
void, and that number of shares in excess of the Ownership Limits would 
be deemed to have been transferred to ISE Holdings, as ``Special 
Trustee'' of a ``Charitable Trust'' for the exclusive benefit of a 
``Charitable Beneficiary'' to be determined by ISE Holdings.\41\ These 
corrective procedures also would apply if there is any other event 
causing any holder of ISE Holdings stock to exceed the Ownership 
Limits, such as a repurchase of shares by ISE Holdings. The automatic 
transfer would be deemed to be effective as of the close of business on 
the business day prior to the date of the violative transfer or other 
event. The Special Trustee of the Charitable Trust would be required to 
sell the Excess Shares to a person whose ownership of shares is not 
expected to violate the Ownership Limits, subject to the right of ISE 
Holdings to repurchase those shares. The proposed changes to the ISE 
Holdings COI are as follows: \42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ ISE Holdings may also determine to appoint as ``Special 
Trustee'' any entity that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any 
Person or its Related Persons owning Excess Shares, and any 
successor trustee appointed by ISE Holdings. Currently, the ISE 
Trust would hold capital stock of ISE Holdings in the event that a 
person obtains ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in 
excess of the Ownership Limits or Voting Limits or in the event of a 
Material Compliance Event. See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6, for a 
discussion of the ISE Trust, including the operation thereof.
    \42\ The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the actual 
Ownership Limits or Voting Limits specified in the current ISE 
Holdings COI. See Article FOURTH, sections III(a) and III(b) of the 
ISE Holdings COI. The Exchange proposes to delete certain defined 
terms from the ISE Holdings COI, such as ``ISE Trust,'' ``Trust 
Beneficiary'' and ``Trustee,'' and replace them with new defined 
terms within the ISE Holdings COI, such as ``Charitable Trust,'' 
``Charitable Beneficiary'' and ``Special Trustee.'' The Exchange 
also proposes to renumber certain sections of the ISE Holdings COI 
to account for proposed new and deleted sections therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The Exchange proposes to delete the current provisions in 
Article Fourth, Sections III(a)(ii), III(a)(iii) and III(b)(i) of the 
ISE Holdings COI that provide that the ISE Holdings Board of Directors 
shall deliver to the ISE Trust copies of certain written notice and 
updates thereto currently required under Sections III(a)(ii) and 
III(a)(iii) of Article FOURTH (i.e., if any Person at any time owns, of 
record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, five percent 
(5%) or more of the then outstanding Voting Shares).
     The Exchange proposes to adopt new Article FOURTH, Section 
III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, which would provide that, 
notwithstanding any other provisions contained in the ISE Holdings COI, 
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any shares of 
capital stock of ISE Holdings (whether such shares are common stock or 
preferred stock) not entitled to be voted due to the restrictions set 
forth in Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI 
(and not waived by the ISE Holdings Board of Directors and approved by 
the Commission pursuant to Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the 
ISE Holdings COI), shall not be deemed to be outstanding for purposes 
of determining a quorum or a minimum vote required for the transaction 
of any business at any meeting of stockholders of ISE Holdings, 
including, without limitation, when specified business is to be voted 
on by a class or a series voting as a class.
     As a result of the addition of new Article FOURTH, Section 
III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, the Exchange proposes to renumber 
current Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) as resulting Article 
FOURTH, section III(b)(iv).
     The Exchange proposes several changes to Article FOURTH, 
section III(c) of the ISE Holdings COI, which relates to violations of 
any Ownership Limits or Voting Limits and the treatment of Excess 
Shares, including the following:
     Addition of new text relating to the designation as 
``Excess Shares'' for any shares held in excess of the relevant 
Ownership Limits; such designation and treatment being effective as of 
the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the 
purported transfer or other event leading to such Excess Shares.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ See resulting Article FOURTH, section III(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Deletion of current text requiring notification to the ISE 
Trust upon the occurrence of certain events and the transfer of Voting 
Shares to the ISE Trust.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Addition of new text describing the treatment of ``Excess 
Shares'' upon any sale, transfer, assignment or pledge that, if 
effective would result in any Person, either alone or together with its 
Related Persons, owning shares in excess of any of the Ownership 
Limits. Specifically, the Exchange proposes within new Article FOURTH, 
section III(c)(i) of the ISE Holdings COI that any such purported event 
shall be void ab initio as to such Excess Shares, and the intended 
transferee shall acquire no rights in such Excess Shares. Such Excess 
Shares shall be deemed to have been transferred to ISE Holdings (or to 
an entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is unaffiliated with ISE 
Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons owning such Excess 
Shares), as Special Trustee of the Charitable Trust for the exclusive 
benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary or Beneficiaries.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(ii). The 
``Charitable Beneficiary'' would be one or more organizations 
described in sections 170(b)(1)(A) or 170(c) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. The ``Charitable Trust'' 
would be the trust established for the benefit of the Charitable 
Beneficiary for which ISE Holdings is the trustee. The ``Special 
Trustee'' would be ISE Holdings, in its capacity as trustee for the 
Charitable Trust, any entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is 
unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons 
owning Excess Shares, and any successor trustee appointed by ISE 
Holdings.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30391]]

     Addition of new text describing the treatment of dividends 
or other distributions paid with respect to Excess Shares.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Addition of new text describing the handling of any 
distribution of assets received in respect of the Excess Shares in any 
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or any distribution of the 
assets of ISE Holdings.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Addition of new text describing the authority of the 
Special Trustee with respect to rescinding as void any votes cast by a 
purported transferee or holder of Excess Shares as well as recasting of 
votes in accordance with the desires of the Special Trustee acting for 
the benefit of ISE Holdings.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Addition of new text describing the sale by the Special 
Trustee, to a Person or Persons designated by the Special Trustee whose 
ownership of Voting Shares will not violate any Ownership Limit or 
Voting Limit, of Excess Shares transferred to the Charitable Trust, 
within 20 days of receiving notice from ISE Holdings that Excess Shares 
have been so transferred.\49\ Existing text would be deleted that 
requires the Trustees of the ISE Trust to use their commercially 
reasonable efforts to sell the Excess Shares upon receipt of written 
instructions from the ISE Trust Beneficiary. New text also would be 
added describing the handling of any proceeds of such a sale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Addition of new text describing that Excess Shares shall 
be deemed to have been offered for sale to ISE Holdings on the date of 
the transaction or event resulting in such Excess Shares.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See proposed Article FOURTH, section III(c)(vii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Deletion of current Article FOURTH, section III(c)(v), 
which currently relates to the ISE Trust Beneficiary's right to 
reacquire Excess Shares from the ISE Trust under certain circumstances.
    The Exchange is not proposing to reinstate all of the ISE Holdings 
COI text that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE 
Holdings, as certain of such text would continue to not be applicable, 
even after the Transaction, given the Exchange's resulting ownership. 
For example, prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings, 
the ISE Holdings COI contained certain provisions that dealt with the 
publicly-traded nature of ISE Holdings' stock. This text was removed 
from the ISE Holdings COI upon Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE 
Holdings, as ISE Holdings' stock ceased to be publicly-traded.\51\ 
Therefore, the Exchange is not proposing to reinstate the following 
provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that existed prior to Deutsche 
B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings relating to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See Exhibit 5A to SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Regulation 14A under the Act (pertaining to solicitations 
of proxies).
     the treatment of transactions of ISE Holdings stock on or 
through the facilities of any national securities exchange or national 
securities association.
     inspection of the ISE Holdings accounts and records by ISE 
Holdings stockholders.
     stockholder voting to amend, repeal or adopt provisions of 
the ISE Holdings COI or the ISE Holdings Bylaws.
     stockholder action called at annual or special meetings of 
stockholders.
     nominations for directors and the election thereof.
    The Exchange also is not proposing to reinstate the ISE Holdings 
COI text that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE 
Holdings that related to changes in terminology used throughout the ISE 
Holdings COI.\52\ Additionally, provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that 
authorize shares of capital stock of ISE Holdings have been amended 
since Deutsche B[ouml]rse acquired ownership of ISE Holdings.\53\ The 
Exchange does not propose to amend the text of the ISE Holdings COI 
relating to share authorization. The Exchange also does not propose to 
reinstate the location or specific wording of text of the ISE Holdings 
COI that was adjusted or relocated upon Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership 
of ISE Holdings, but that otherwise has the same practical effect and 
meaning as it did prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE 
Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ For example, the ISE Holdings COI currently refers to 
Delaware General Corporation Law as ``DGCL.'' The Exchange would not 
reinstate the prior ``GCL'' term that was used in the ISE Holdings 
COI.
    \53\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73860 
(December 17, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 23, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-
44).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. U.S. Exchange Holdings COI
    The Exchange proposes to remove the reference to the Trust 
Agreement in Article THIRTEENTH of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI. As 
proposed herein, the Trust Agreement will cease to be considered rules 
of the Exchange as of the Closing of the Transaction and would be 
repealed in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange also proposes 
to retitle the document as the ``Fourth'' Amended and Restated 
Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Exchange Holdings and update the 
effective date thereof.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ The proposed, amended U.S. Exchange Holdings COI is 
attached hereto as Exhibit 5F. Article SIXTEENTH of the U.S. 
Exchange Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange 
Holdings shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or 
facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision 
of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall 
be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the 
same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the 
Commission before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the 
Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be 
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the 
Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange also proposes to amend 
the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI to consistently refer to such 
document as the ``Restated Certificate,'' which is a defined term 
therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. ISE Holdings Bylaws
    The ISE Holdings COI Voting Limits restrict any person, either 
alone or together with its related persons, from having voting control, 
either directly or indirectly, over more than 20% of the outstanding 
capital stock of ISE Holdings. The ISE Holdings COI Ownership Limits 
restrict any person, either alone or together with its related persons, 
from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than 
40% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings (or in the case of 
any Exchange member, acting alone or together with its related persons, 
from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than 
20% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings).\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, section III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ISE Holdings COI and the ISE Holdings Bylaws provide that the 
board of directors of ISE Holdings may waive these voting and ownership 
restrictions in an amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws if the board 
makes the following three findings: (1) The waiver will not impair the 
ability of the Exchange to carry out its functions and responsibilities 
as an exchange under the Act and the rules thereunder; (2) the waiver 
is otherwise in the best interests of ISE Holdings, its stockholders, 
and the Exchange; and (3) the waiver will not impair the ability of the 
Commission to enforce the Act. However, the board of directors may not 
waive these voting and ownership restrictions as they apply to Exchange 
members. In

[[Page 30392]]

addition, the board of directors may not waive these voting and 
ownership restrictions if such waiver would result in a person subject 
to a ``statutory disqualification'' owning or voting shares above the 
stated thresholds. Any waiver of these voting and ownership 
restrictions must be by way of an amendment to the Bylaws approved by 
the board of directors, which amendment must be approved by the 
Commission.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, sections III(a)(i) 
and III(b)(i). Such amendment to Holdings Bylaws must be filed with 
and approved by the Commission under section 19(b) of the Act and 
become effective thereunder. In this regard, section 10.1 of the 
Bylaws provides that the Bylaws may be amended, added to, rescinded 
or repealed at any meeting of the Board of Directors of ISE Holdings 
or meeting of the stockholders. With respect to each national 
securities exchange controlled, directly or indirectly, by ISE 
Holdings (the ``Controlled National Securities Exchanges''), or 
facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision 
of the Bylaws of ISE Holdings shall be effective, the same shall be 
submitted to the board of directors of each Controlled National 
Securities Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed 
with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be 
effective, under section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated 
thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with, 
or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may be.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Acting pursuant to this waiver provision, the board of directors of 
ISE Holdings has approved the amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws to 
waive the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq 
to indirectly own 100% of the outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings 
as of and after Closing of the Transaction.\57\ In adopting such 
amendment, the board of directors of ISE Holdings made the necessary 
determinations and approved the submission of the Proposed Rule Change 
to the Commission. In so waiving the applicable voting and ownership 
restrictions, the board of directors of ISE Holdings has determined, 
with respect to Nasdaq, that: (i) Such waiver will not impair the 
ability of ISE Holdings and each Controlled National Securities 
Exchange, or facility thereof, to carry out its respective functions 
and responsibilities under the Act and the rules promulgated 
thereunder; \58\ (ii) such waiver is otherwise in the best interests of 
ISE Holdings, its stockholders, and each Controlled National Securities 
Exchange, or facility thereof; \59\ (iii) such waiver will not impair 
the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act; \60\ (iv) neither 
Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons (as that term is defined in the 
ISE Holdings COI) are subject to any applicable ``statutory 
disqualification'' (within the meaning of section 3(a)(39) of the Act); 
and (v) neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons is a member (as 
such term is defined in section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Act) of such 
Controlled National Securities Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ The proposed, amended ISE Holdings Bylaws are attached 
hereto as Exhibit 5G. The proposed amendment to the ISE Holdings 
Bylaws would also clarify that Eurex Global Derivatives AG or 
``EGD,'' which is referenced in section 11.2 of the ISE Holdings 
Bylaws, ceased to be an Upstream Owner of the Exchange as a result 
of a prior transaction that did not require an amendment to the ISE 
Holdings Bylaws. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73530 
(November 5, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 17, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-
44).
    \58\ For example, the Exchange will continue to conduct its 
regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market 
and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any 
changes to its regulated activities in connection with the 
Transaction. The Exchange is not proposing any amendments to its 
trading or regulatory rules at this time relating to the 
Transaction.
    \59\ For example, the Transaction will produce a stronger and 
more efficient infrastructure that will have an improved ability to 
provide innovative products and services.
    \60\ For example, the Commission will continue to have plenary 
regulatory authority over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as 
well as jurisdiction over the Exchange's direct and indirect owners 
with respect to activities related to the Exchange. The Commission 
will continue to have appropriate oversight tools to ensure that the 
Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act with respect to 
the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their directors 
(where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the extent 
they are involved in the activities of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities 
(including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the 
manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its 
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. In addition, 
the Transaction will not impair the ability of the Exchange's, or any 
facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and 
responsibilities under the Act and will not impair the ability of the 
Commission to enforce the Act. The Exchange therefore seeks approval of 
the waiver described herein with respect to the Ownership Limits and 
Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the 
outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the 
Transaction.
Summary
    The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities 
(including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the 
manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its 
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. The 
Transaction will not impair the ability of ISE Holdings, the Exchange, 
or any facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and 
responsibilities under the Act. Moreover, the Transaction will not 
impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act with respect to 
the Exchange. As such, the Commission's plenary regulatory authority 
over the Exchange will not be affected by the approval of this Proposed 
Rule Change. The Exchange is requesting approval by the Commission of 
changes proposed herein in order to allow the Transaction to take 
place.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with section 
6(b) of the Act,\61\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section 
6(b)(1) of the Act,\62\ in particular, in that it enables the Exchange 
to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the 
purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its 
exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with 
the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and 
the rules of the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is designed to 
enable the Exchange to continue to have the authority and ability to 
effectively fulfill its self-regulatory duties pursuant to the Act and 
the rules promulgated thereunder. The Exchange will continue to conduct 
its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market 
and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any 
changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. 
Thus, the Commission will continue to have plenary regulatory authority 
over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as well as jurisdiction 
over the Exchange's direct and indirect owners with respect to 
activities related to the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is 
consistent with and will facilitate an ownership structure that will 
continue to provide the Commission with appropriate oversight tools to 
ensure that the Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act 
with respect to the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their 
directors (where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the 
extent they are involved in the activities of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \62\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that this Proposed Rule Change furthers 
the objectives of section 6(b)(5) \63\ of the Act because the Proposed 
Rule Change would be consistent with and facilitate a governance and 
regulatory structure that is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to

[[Page 30393]]

promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, 
the Exchange believes that the Proposed Rule Change will continue to 
provide the Commission and the Exchange with access to necessary 
information that will allow the Exchange to efficiently and effectively 
enforce compliance with the Act, as well as allow the Commission to 
provide proper oversight, which will ultimately promote just and 
equitable principles of trade and protect investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Approval of this Proposed Rule Change will enable ISE Holdings to 
continue its operations and the Exchange to continue its orderly 
discharge of regulatory duties to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, 
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to 
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest.
    In addition, the Exchange expects that the Transaction will 
facilitate efficiencies and innovation for clients and efficient, 
transparent and well-regulated markets for issuers and clients, thus 
removing impediments to, and perfecting the mechanism of a free and 
open market and a national market system. The Transaction will benefit 
investors, the market as a whole, and shareholders by, among other 
things, enhancing competition among securities venues and reducing 
costs. In particular, the Transaction will contribute to streamlined 
and efficient operations, thereby intensifying competition for 
transaction order flow with other exchange and non-exchange trading 
centers, as well as potentially in other areas, such as proprietary 
market data products and listings. This enhanced level of competition 
among trading centers will benefit investors through new or more 
competitive product offerings and, ultimately, lower costs.
    Furthermore, the Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated 
activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members) 
in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its 
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. Therefore, the 
Exchange believes that it will continue to satisfy the requirements of 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to 
a national securities exchange.
    The Exchange believes it is consistent with the Act to allow Nasdaq 
to become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. Neither Nasdaq nor any 
of its related persons is subject to any statutory disqualification or 
is a Member of the Exchange. Moreover, the Nasdaq governing documents 
include certain provisions designed to maintain the independence of the 
Exchange's self-regulatory functions. Accordingly, the Exchange 
believes that Nasdaq's acquisition of ultimate ownership and exercise 
of voting control of the Exchange will not impair the ability of the 
Commission or the Exchange to discharge their respective 
responsibilities under the Act.
    Although Nasdaq will not carry out regulatory functions, its 
activities with respect to the operation of the Exchange must be 
consistent with, and not interfere with, the Exchange's self-regulatory 
obligations. Nasdaq's governing documents include certain provisions 
that are designed to maintain the independence of the Exchange's self-
regulatory functions, enable the Exchange to operate in a manner that 
complies with the U.S. federal securities laws, including the 
objectives and requirements of sections 6(b) and 19(g) of the Act,\64\ 
and facilitate the ability of the Exchange and the Commission to 
fulfill their regulatory and oversight obligations under the Act. For 
example, the Nasdaq governing documents provide that Nasdaq will comply 
with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations 
thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and the Exchange. 
Also, each board member, officer, and employee of Nasdaq, in 
discharging his or her responsibilities, shall comply with the U.S. 
federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, 
cooperate with the Commission, and cooperate with the Exchange. In 
discharging his or her responsibilities as a board member of Nasdaq, 
each such member must, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable 
law, take into consideration the effect that Nasdaq's actions would 
have on the ability of the Exchange to carry out its responsibilities 
under the Act. In addition, Nasdaq, its board members, officers and 
employees shall give due regard to the preservation of the independence 
of the self-regulatory function of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, Nasdaq (along with its respective board members, officers, 
and employees) and U.S. Exchange Holdings agree to keep confidential, 
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, all confidential 
information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of the Exchange, 
including, but not limited to, confidential information regarding 
disciplinary matters, trading data, trading practices, and audit 
information, contained in the books and records of the Exchange and not 
use such information for any non-regulatory purposes.
    In addition, Nasdaq's books and records relating to the activities 
of the Exchange will at all times be made available for, and books and 
records of U.S. Exchange Holdings will be subject at all times to, 
inspection and copying by the Commission and the Exchange. Books and 
records of U.S. Exchange Holdings related to the activities of the 
Exchange also will continue to be maintained within the U.S. Moreover, 
for so long as Nasdaq directly or indirectly controls the Exchange, the 
books, records, officers, directors (or equivalent), and employees of 
Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books, records, officers, directors, 
and employees of the Exchange.
    To the extent involved in the activities of the Exchange, Nasdaq, 
its board members, officers, and employees irrevocably submit to the 
jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the Commission for purposes 
of any action arising out of, or relating to, the activities of the 
Exchange. Likewise, U.S. Exchange Holdings, its officers and directors, 
and employees whose principal place of business and residence is 
outside of the U.S., to the extent such directors, officers, or 
employees are involved in the activities of the Exchange, irrevocably 
submit to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the 
Commission for purposes of any action arising out of, or relating to, 
the activities of the Exchange.
    The Nasdaq governing documents, the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, and 
the U.S. Exchange Holdings Bylaws require that any change thereto must 
be submitted to the Exchange's Board. If such change must be filed 
with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission under section 19 of 
the Act and the rules thereunder, then such change shall not be 
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the 
Commission. This requirement to submit changes to the Exchange's Board 
continues for so long as Nasdaq or U.S. Exchange

[[Page 30394]]

Holdings, as applicable, directly or indirectly, control the Exchange.
    As Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be 
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the Exchange upon the Closing of the 
Transaction, the Exchange believes that its proposal that the 
resolutions of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be 
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the 
Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act.
    The purpose for which the ISE Trust was formed will not be relevant 
after the Closing of the Transaction, given that the Exchange will no 
longer have Non-U.S. Upstream Owners and that the Exchange's current 
and resulting U.S. upstream owners' governing documents provide for 
similar protections (e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article 
THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange 
believes that its proposal that the Trust Agreement will cease to be 
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the 
Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act.
    Given the Exchange's proposal to repeal the Trust Agreement and 
dissolve the ISE Trust, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes 
to the ISE Holdings COI are consistent with the Act. The proposed 
changes would delete provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that will no 
longer be relevant and would reinstate certain provisions of the ISE 
Holdings COI that were removed upon introduction of the provisions 
relating to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\65\ the Exchange 
believes that the Proposed Rule Change would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Indeed, the Exchange believes that the Proposed 
Rule Change will enhance competition among intermarket trading venues, 
as the Exchange believes that the Transaction will produce a stronger 
and more efficient infrastructure that will have an improved ability to 
provide innovative products and services. Moreover, the Exchange will 
continue to conduct regulated activities (including operating and 
regulating its market and Members) of the type it currently conducts, 
but will be able to do so in a more efficient manner to the benefit of 
its Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's conclusion that the Proposed Rule Change would not 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act is consistent 
with the Commission's prior conclusions about similar combinations 
involving multiple exchanges in a single corporate family.\66\ In this 
regard, the Exchange notes that the Exchange, and its affiliates ISE 
and ISE Mercury, function only as options trading markets--they do not 
function as equity trading markets or as clearing agencies, as do 
certain of Nasdaq's existing subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66071 (Dec. 
29, 2011), 77 FR 521 (Jan. 05, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2011-107 and SR-NSX-
2011-14); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324 (Aug. 7, 2008), 
73 FR 46936 (Aug. 12, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-2008-23; SR-BSE-
2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
53382 (Feb. 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (Mar. 06, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-
77); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71449 (Jan. 30, 2014), 79 
FR 6961 (Feb. 05, 2014) (SR-EDGA-2013-34; SR-EDGX-2013-43); 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR 
3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR-EDGA-2011-34; SR-EDGX-2011-33; 
SR-ISE-2011-69; SR-NYSE-2011-51; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-78; SR-NYSEArca-
2011-72).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that there is considerable support for a 
finding that the Transaction is consistent with the Act with respect to 
competition. 14 exchanges currently compete for options trading 
business. Exchanges compete on technology, market model, trading venue, 
fees and fee structure. Additionally, low switching costs allow 
customers to easily move to another exchange, which customers do 
regularly, as reflected in constantly varying market shares among the 
existing exchange operators. In addition, the Commission has approved 
several, new registered options exchanges in recent history, which 
highlights an increase in competition in the market for listed options 
trading.\67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76998 
(January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066 (February 4, 2016) (Order approving 
application for exchange registration of ISE Mercury, LLC); 75650 
(August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015) (Order approving 
rules governing the trading of options on the EDGX Options Market); 
70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (Order approving 
application for exchange registration of Topaz Exchange, LLC (n/k/a 
ISE Gemini, LLC)); 68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065 (December 
7, 2012) (Order approving application for exchange registration of 
Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC); 61419 (January 26, 
2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (Order approving rules 
governing the trading of options on the BATS Options Exchange).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the Transaction will not change the 
competitive landscape for listed options trading and the changes 
proposed herein are consistent with other recent Commission approvals. 
For example, a similar proposed combination of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and 
NYSE Euronext in 2011 received Commission approval and would have 
resulted in a combined greater than 40% market share of listed options 
volume among its three, respective options exchanges (based on 2010 
data).\68\ Similarly, as a result of the Transaction, the options 
exchanges owned by Nasdaq would account for approximately 41% aggregate 
market share of listed options volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \68\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17, 
2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR-EDGA-2011-34; SR-
EDGX-2011-33; SR-ISE-2011-69; SR-NYSE-2011-51; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-78; 
SR-NYSEArca-2011-72).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is 
consistent with the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the publication date of this notice or within 
such longer period (1) as the Commission may designate up to 45 days of 
such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and 
publishes its reasons for so finding or (2) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such Proposed Rule Change; or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the Proposed Rule 
Change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISEGemini-2016-05 on the subject line.

[[Page 30395]]

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISEGemini-2016-05. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
    To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site 
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on 
official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. 
Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying 
at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be 
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-ISEGemini-2016-05, and should be 
submitted on or before June 6, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-11406 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.