Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to a Corporate Transaction Involving Its Indirect Parent, 30351-30360 [2016-11405]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
ADAMS
Accession No.
Document
Letter transmitting Early Site Permit number ESP–005 and accompanying documentation ......................................................
Early Site Permit number ESP–005 ............................................................................................................................................
PSEG Site, Early Site Permit Application, Revision 4, June 5, 2015 .........................................................................................
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of May 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark Delligatti,
Deputy Director, Division of New Reactor
Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2016–11470 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77794; File No. SR–ISE–
2016–11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to a Corporate
Transaction Involving Its Indirect
Parent
May 10, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 28,
2016 International Securities Exchange,
LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change, as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes is hereby
filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
a proposed rule change (the ‘‘Proposed
Rule Change’’) in connection with a
proposed business transaction (the
‘‘Transaction’’) involving the Exchange’s
ultimate, indirect, non-U.S. upstream
¨
owners, Deutsche Borse AG (‘‘Deutsche
¨
Borse’’) and Eurex Frankfurt AG (‘‘Eurex
Frankfurt’’), and Nasdaq, Inc.
(‘‘Nasdaq’’). Nasdaq is the parent
company of The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (‘‘NASDAQ Exchange’’), NASDAQ
PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx Exchange’’),
NASDAQ BX, Inc. (‘‘BX Exchange’’),
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Boston Stock Exchange Clearing
Corporation (‘‘BSECC’’) and Stock
Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia
(‘‘SCCP’’).3 Upon completion of the
Transaction (the ‘‘Closing’’), the
Exchange’s indirect parent company,
U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. (‘‘U.S.
Exchange Holdings’’), will become a
direct subsidiary of Nasdaq. The
Exchange will therefore become an
indirect subsidiary of Nasdaq and, in
addition to the Exchange’s current
affiliation with ISE Gemini, LLC (‘‘ISE
Gemini’’) and ISE Mercury, LLC (‘‘ISE
Mercury’’), an affiliate of NASDAQ
Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange,
BSECC and SCCP through common,
ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. Nasdaq
will become the ultimate parent of the
Exchange.4
In order to effect the Transaction, the
Exchange hereby seeks the
Commission’s approval of the following:
(i) That certain corporate resolutions
that were previously established by
entities that will cease to be non-U.S.
upstream owners of the Exchange after
the Transaction will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange upon
Closing; (ii) that certain governing
documents of Nasdaq will be considered
rules of the Exchange upon Closing; (iii)
that the Third Amended and Restated
Trust Agreement (the ‘‘Trust
Agreement’’) that currently exists among
International Securities Exchange
Holdings, Inc. (‘‘ISE Holdings’’), U.S.
Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as
defined therein) with respect to the ‘‘ISE
Trust’’ will cease to be considered rules
of the Exchange upon Closing and,
thereafter, that the parties to the Trust
Agreement would be permitted to take
the corporate steps necessary to repeal
the Trust Agreement and dissolve the
ISE Trust; (iv) to amend and restate the
Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of ISE
Holdings (‘‘ISE Holdings COI’’) to
eliminate provisions relating to the
Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust and,
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58179
(July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 2008) (SR–
Phlx–2008–31); 58324 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR
46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008–02; SR–
BSE–2008–23; SR–BSE–2008–25; SR–BSECC–2008–
01).
4 The Exchange’s current affiliates, ISE Gemini
and ISE Mercury, have submitted nearly identical
proposed rule changes. See SR–ISEGemini–2016–05
and SR–ISEMercury–2016–10.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
30351
Sfmt 4703
ML16084A780
ML16084A798
ML15168A201
in this respect, to reinstate certain text
of the ISE Holdings COI that existed
¨
prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of
ISE Holdings; (v) to amend and restate
the Second Amended and Restated
Bylaws of ISE Holdings (the ‘‘ISE
Holdings Bylaws’’) to waive certain
voting and ownership restrictions in the
ISE Holdings COI to permit Nasdaq to
indirectly own 100% of the outstanding
common stock of ISE Holdings as of and
after Closing of the Transaction; and (vi)
to amend and restate the Third
Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of U.S. Exchange
Holdings (‘‘U.S. Exchange Holdings
COI’’) to eliminate references therein to
the Trust Agreement.
The Exchange requests that the
Proposed Rule Change become operative
at the Closing of the Transaction. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and on the Exchange’s
Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange submits this Proposed
Rule Change to seek the Commission’s
approval of various changes to the
organizational and governance
documents of the Exchange’s current
owners and related actions that are
necessary in connection with the
Closing of the Transaction, as described
below. The Exchange will continue to
conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its
market and Members) in the manner
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
30352
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
currently conducted and will not make
any changes to its regulated activities in
connection with the Transaction. The
Exchange is not proposing any
amendments to its trading or regulatory
rules at this time relating to the
Transaction.5 The Exchange would
continue to be registered as a national
securities exchange, with separate rules,
membership rosters, and listings,
distinct from the rules, membership
rosters, and listings of NASDAQ
Exchange, Phlx Exchange and BX
Exchange as well as from its current
affiliates, ISE Gemini and ISE Mercury.
Neither the Exchange nor its current
affiliates engage in clearing securities
transactions, nor would they do so after
the Transaction. Additionally, the
Exchange would continue to be a
separate self-regulatory organization
(‘‘SRO’’).
1. Current Ownership Structure of the
Exchange
On December 17, 2007, ISE Holdings,
the sole, direct parent of the Exchange,
became a direct, wholly-owned
subsidiary of U.S. Exchange Holdings.6
U.S. Exchange Holdings is 85% directly
owned by Eurex Frankfurt and 15%
¨
directly owned by Deutsche Borse.
Eurex Frankfurt is a wholly-owned,
¨
direct subsidiary of Deutsche Borse.7
¨
Deutsche Borse therefore owns 100% of
U.S. Exchange Holdings through its
aggregate direct and indirect ownership.
2. The Transaction
On March 9, 2016, a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) was
¨
entered into among Deutsche Borse,
Eurex Frankfurt and Nasdaq. Pursuant
to and subject to the terms of the
Agreement, at the Closing, Deutsche
¨
Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will sell,
transfer and deliver to Nasdaq, and
Nasdaq will purchase, the capital stock
of U.S. Exchange Holdings.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3. Post-Closing Ownership Structure of
the Exchange
As a result of the Transaction, Nasdaq
will directly own 100% of the equity
interest of U.S. Exchange Holdings. U.S.
5 If the Exchange determines to make any such
changes, it will seek the approval of the
Commission only after the approval of this
Proposed Rule Change to the extent required by the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), the Commission’s rules thereunder, or the
Exchange’s rules.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56955
(December 13, 2007), 72 FR 71979 (December 19,
2007) (SR–ISE–2007–101).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66834
(April 19, 2012), 77 FR 24752 (April 25, 2012) (SR–
¨
ISE–2012–21). Each of Deutsche Borse and Eurex
Frankfurt is referred to as a ‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream
Owner’’ and collectively as the ‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Exchange Holdings will remain the sole,
direct owner of ISE Holdings. ISE
Holdings will remain the sole, direct
owner of the Exchange. The Exchange
will therefore become an indirect
subsidiary of Nasdaq and Nasdaq will
become the ultimate parent of the
Exchange. The Exchange will become an
affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx
Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and
SCCP through common, ultimate
ownership by Nasdaq. As a result of the
¨
Transaction, Deutsche Borse and Eurex
Frankfurt will cease to be owners of the
Exchange. The Exchange will therefore
cease to have any Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners. The Transaction will not have
any effect on ISE Holdings’ direct
ownership of the Exchange. However,
consummation of the Transaction is
subject to approval of this Proposed
Rule Change by the Commission, as
described below.
4. Non-U.S. Upstream Owner
Resolutions
¨
Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt,
as the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the
Exchange, have previously taken
appropriate steps to incorporate
provisions regarding ownership,
jurisdiction, books and records, and
other issues related to their control of
the Exchange. Specifically, each of such
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners has adopted
resolutions (‘‘Non-U.S. Upstream Owner
Resolutions’’), which were previously
approved by the Commission, to
incorporate these concepts with respect
to itself, as well as its board members,
officers, employees, and agents (as
applicable), to the extent that they are
involved in the activities of the
Exchange.8 For example, the resolution
of each of such Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners provides that it shall comply
with the U.S. federal securities laws and
the rules and regulations thereunder
and shall cooperate with the
Commission and with the Exchange. In
addition, the resolution of each of such
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners provides
that the board members, including each
person who becomes a board member,
would so consent to comply and
cooperate and the particular Non-U.S.
Upstream Owner would take reasonable
steps to cause its officers, employees,
and agents to also comply and
cooperate, to the extent that he or she
is involved in the activities of the
Exchange.
Section 19(b) of the Act,9 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,10 require an SRO to
8 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6; SR–ISE–
2012–21, supra note 7.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
file proposed rule changes with the
Commission. Although the Non-U.S.
Upstream Owners are not SROs, the
Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions
have previously been filed with the
Commission as stated policies,
practices, or interpretations of the
Exchange and therefore are considered
rules of the Exchange.11 As Deutsche
¨
Borse and Eurex Frankfurt will both
cease to be Non-U.S. Upstream Owners
of the Exchange after the Transaction,
the Exchange proposes that the
¨
resolutions of Deutsche Borse and Eurex
Frankfurt will cease to be stated
policies, practices, or interpretations of
the Exchange and, therefore, will cease
to be considered rules of the Exchange
as of a date that corresponds to the
Closing date of the Transaction.12
5. Nasdaq Governing Documents
Nasdaq will become the ultimate
parent of the Exchange upon the Closing
of the Transaction. As described above,
Section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b–
4 thereunder require an SRO to file
proposed rule changes with the
Commission. Although the Exchange’s
existing U.S. upstream owners are not
SROs, their governing documents have
previously been filed with the
Commission as stated policies,
practices, or interpretations of the
Exchange and therefore are considered
rules of the Exchange.13 The Exchange
proposes that the Nasdaq Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(‘‘Nasdaq COI’’) and the Nasdaq Bylaws
(‘‘Nasdaq Bylaws, and together with the
Nasdaq COI, the ‘‘Nasdaq governing
documents’’) will become stated
policies, practices, or interpretations of
the Exchange as of the Closing and,
11 See
SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6 at 71981.
‘‘Form of German Parent Corporation
Resolutions’’ is attached hereto as Exhibit 5A. As
referenced above, resolutions in relation to board
members, officers, employees, and agents (as
¨
applicable) of Deutsche Borse and Eurex Frankfurt
also would cease accordingly. Resolution 11
provides that, notwithstanding any provision of the
resolutions, before: (a) Any amendment to or repeal
of any provision of this or any of the resolutions;
or (b) any action that would have the effect of
amending or repealing any provision of the
resolutions shall be effective, the same shall be
submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange,
and if the same must be filed with, or filed with
and approved by, the Commission before the same
may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and
the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same
shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with
and approved by, the Commission, as the case may
¨
be. In addition, Deutsche Borse, Eurex Frankfurt,
U.S. Exchange Holdings, ISE Holdings, and the
Exchange previously became parties to an
agreement to provide for adequate funding for the
Exchange’s regulatory responsibilities. ISE Gemini
and ISE Mercury subsequently became parties to
the agreement. This agreement will be terminated
upon the Closing of the Transaction.
13 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6 at 71981.
12 The
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
therefore, will be considered rules of the
Exchange as of a date that corresponds
to the Closing date of the Transaction.14
The Nasdaq Bylaws contain certain
provisions regarding ownership,
jurisdiction, books and records, and
other issues, with respect to Nasdaq, as
well as its board members, officers,
employees, and agents (as applicable),
relating to Nasdaq’s control of any ‘‘SelfRegulatory Subsidiary’’ (i.e., any
subsidiary of Nasdaq that is an SRO as
defined under Section 3(a)(26) of the
Act).15 The Exchange would be a ‘‘SelfRegulatory Subsidiary’’ of Nasdaq upon
the Closing of the Transaction. The
provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws are
comparable to the provisions of the
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners
Resolutions, including in the following
manner:
• Giving due regard to the
preservation of the independence of the
self-regulatory function of each of
Nasdaq’s Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries.16
• Maintaining the confidentiality of
all books and records of each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary reflecting
confidential information pertaining to
the self-regulatory function of such SelfRegulatory Subsidiary (including but
not limited to disciplinary matters,
trading data, trading practices and audit
information) that comes into Nasdaq’s
possession, which shall not be used for
any non-regulatory purposes; making
such books and records available for
inspection and copying by the
Commission; and maintaining such
books and records relating to each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary in the United
States.17
• To the extent they are related to the
activities of a Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary, the books, records,
premises, officers, Directors, and
employees of Nasdaq shall be deemed to
be the books, records, premises, officers,
directors, and employees of such SelfRegulatory Subsidiary for the purposes
of, and subject to oversight pursuant to,
the Act.18
• Compliance by Nasdaq with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the
rules and regulations thereunder,
cooperation by Nasdaq with the
Commission and Nasdaq’s Self14 The Nasdaq COI dated January 24, 2014 is
attached hereto as Exhibit 5B along with subsequent
amendments thereto dated November 17, 2014 and
September 8, 2015 and the Certificate of
Elimination of the Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock dated January 27, 2014. The Nasdaq Bylaws
are attached hereto as Exhibit 5C.
15 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26).
16 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(a) (Self-Regulatory
Organization Functions of the Self-Regulatory
Subsidiaries).
17 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(b).
18 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Regulatory Subsidiaries, and reasonable
steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its
agents to cooperate with the
Commission and, where applicable, the
Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries pursuant to
their regulatory authority.19
• Consent by Nasdaq and its officers,
Directors, and employees to the
jurisdiction of the United States federal
courts, the Commission, and each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary for the purposes
of any suit, action or proceeding
pursuant to the United States federal
securities laws, and the rules and
regulations thereunder, arising out of, or
relating to, the activities of any SelfRegulatory Subsidiary.20
• Reasonable steps by Nasdaq
necessary to cause its current and future
officers, Directors, and employees, to
consent in writing to the applicability to
them of certain provisions of the Nasdaq
Bylaws, as applicable, with respect to
their activities related to any SelfRegulatory Subsidiary.21
• Approval by the Commission under
Section 19 of the Act prior to any
resolution of the Nasdaq Board to
approve an exemption for any person
from the ownership limitations of the
Nasdaq COI.22
• Filing with, or filing with and
approval by, the Commission (as the
case may be) under Section 19 of the
Act prior to amending the Nasdaq COI
or the Nasdaq Bylaws.23
The Exchange believes that the
provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws should
minimize the potential that a person
could improperly interfere with, or
restrict the ability of, the Commission or
the Exchange to effectively carry out
their regulatory oversight
responsibilities under the Act.24
19 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.2(a) (Cooperation
with the Commission). The officers, Directors, and
employees of Nasdaq, by virtue of their acceptance
of such position, shall be deemed to agree to
cooperate with the Commission and each SelfRegulatory Subsidiary in respect of the
Commission’s oversight responsibilities regarding
the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries and the selfregulatory functions and responsibilities of the SelfRegulatory Subsidiaries. Nasdaq Bylaws Section
12.2(b).
20 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.3 (Consent to
Jurisdiction).
21 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.4 (Further
Assurances).
22 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5 (Board Action
with Respect to Voting Limitations of the Certificate
of Incorporation).
23 Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.6 (Amendments to
the Certificate of Incorporation); Nasdaq Bylaws
Section 11.3 (Review by Self-Regulatory
Subsidiaries).
24 The U.S. Exchange Holdings COI also includes
similar provisions, including that U.S. Exchange
Holdings will take reasonable steps necessary to
cause ISE Holdings to be in compliance with the
‘‘Ownership Limit’’ and the ‘‘Voting Limit.’’ See
U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, Articles TENTH
through SIXTEENTH. The U.S. Exchange Holdings
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30353
Additionally, and similar to the ISE
Holdings COI, the Nasdaq COI imposes
limits on direct and indirect changes in
control, which are designed to prevent
any shareholder from exercising undue
control over the operation of its SRO
subsidiaries and to ensure that its SRO
subsidiaries and the Commission are
able to carry out their regulatory
obligations under the Act. Specifically,
no person who beneficially owns shares
of common stock, preferred stock, or
notes of Nasdaq in excess of 5% of the
securities generally entitled to vote may
vote the shares in excess of 5%.25 This
limitation would mitigate the potential
for any Nasdaq shareholder to exercise
undue control over the operations of the
Exchange, and it facilitates the
Exchange’s and the Commission’s
ability to carry out their regulatory
obligations under the Act. The Nasdaq
Board may approve exemptions from
the 5% voting limitation for any person
that is not a broker-dealer, an affiliate of
a broker-dealer, or a person subject to a
statutory disqualification under Section
3(a)(39) of the Act,26 provided that the
Nasdaq Board also determines that
granting such exemption would be
consistent with the self-regulatory
obligations of its SRO subsidiary.27
Further, any such exemption from the
5% voting limitation would not be
effective until approved by the
Commission pursuant to Section 19 of
the Act.28
6. Trust Agreement 29
The ISE Holdings COI currently
contains certain ownership limits
COI provides that U.S. Exchange Holdings will
notify the Exchange’s Board if any ‘‘Person,’’ either
alone or together with its ‘‘Related Persons,’’ at any
time owns (whether by acquisition or by a change
in the number of shares outstanding) of record or
beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, 10%,
15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, or 40% or more of the
then outstanding shares of U.S. Exchange Holdings.
See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6, at 71981.
25 See Article FOURTH, Section C of the Nasdaq
COI.
26 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39).
27 See Article FOURTH, Section C.6. of the
Nasdaq COI. Specifically, the Nasdaq Board must
determine that granting such exemption would (1)
not reasonably be expected to diminish the quality
of, or public confidence in, Nasdaq or the other
operations of Nasdaq, on the ability to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and
on investors and the public, and (2) promote just
and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information
with respect to an facilitating transactions in
securities or assist in the removal of impediments
to or perfection of the mechanisms for a free and
open market and a national market system.
28 See Section 12.5 of the Nasdaq Bylaws.
29 The Trust Agreement exists among ISE
Holdings, U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees
(as defined therein). By its terms, the Trust
Agreement originally related solely to ISE Holdings’
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
Continued
16MYN1
30354
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(‘‘Ownership Limits’’) and voting limits
(‘‘Voting Limits’’) with respect to the
outstanding capital stock of ISE
Holdings.30 The Trust Agreement was
entered into in 2007 to provide for an
automatic transfer of ISE Holdings
shares to a trust (the ‘‘ISE Trust’’) if a
Person 31 were to obtain an ownership
or voting interest in ISE Holdings in
excess of these Ownership Limits and
Voting Limits, through ownership of
one of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners,
without obtaining the approval of the
Commission. In this regard, the Trust
Agreement serves four general purposes:
(i) To accept, hold and dispose of Trust
Shares 32 on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth therein; (ii) to
determine whether a Material
Compliance Event 33 has occurred or is
continuing; (iii) to determine whether
the occurrence and continuation of a
Material Compliance Event requires the
exercise of the Call Option; 34 and (iv) to
transfer Deposited Shares from the Trust
to the Trust Beneficiary 35 as provided
ownership of ISE, and not to any other national
securities exchange that ISE Holdings might
control, directly or indirectly. In 2010, the
Commission approved proposed rule changes that
revised the Trust Agreement to replace references
to ISE with references to any Controlled National
Securities Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 59135 (December 22, 2008), 73 FR
79954 (December 30, 2008) (SR–ISE–2008–85) and
61498 (February 4, 2010), 75 FR 7299 (February 18,
2010) (SR–ISE–2009–90); see also ISE Trust
Agreement, Articles I and II, Sections 1.1 and 2.6.
Thus, the ISE Trust Agreement also applies to ISE
Gemini and ISE Mercury.
30 See Article FOURTH, Section III of the ISE
Holdings COI.
31 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6. Under the
Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Person’’ means any
individual, corporation (including not-for-profit),
general or limited partnership, limited liability
company, joint venture, estate, trust, association,
organization, government or any agency or political
subdivision thereof, or any other entity of any kind
or nature.
32 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Trust
Shares’’ means either Excess Shares or Deposited
Shares, or both, as the case may be. The term
‘‘Excess Shares’’ means that a Person obtained an
ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in
excess of certain ownership and voting restrictions
pursuant to Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings
COI, through, for example, ownership of one of the
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners or U.S. Exchange
Holdings, without obtaining the approval of the
Commission. The term ‘‘Deposited Shares’’ means
shares that are transferred to the Trust pursuant to
the Trust’s exercise of the Call Option.
33 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Material
Compliance Event’’ means, with respect to a NonU.S. Upstream Owner, any state of facts,
development, event, circumstance, condition,
occurrence or effect that results in the failure of any
of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners to adhere to their
respective commitments under the resolutions (i.e.,
as referenced in note 7) in any material respect.
34 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Call
Option’’ means the option granted by the Trust
Beneficiary to the Trust to call the Voting Shares
as set forth in Section 4.2 therein.
35 Under the Trust Agreement, the term ‘‘Trust
Beneficiary’’ means U.S. Exchange Holdings.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
in Section 4.2(h) therein. The ISE Trust,
and corresponding Trust Agreement, is
the mechanism by which the Ownership
Limits and Voting Limits in the ISE
Holdings COI currently would be
protected in the event that a Non-US
Upstream Owner purportedly transfers
any related ownership or voting rights
other than in accordance with the ISE
Holdings COI.
As described above, Section 19(b) of
the Act and Rule 19b–4 thereunder
require an SRO to file proposed rule
changes with the Commission. Although
the ISE Trust is not an SRO, the Trust
Agreement has previously been filed
with the Commission as stated policies,
practices, or interpretations of the
Exchange and therefore is considered
rules of the Exchange.36 The purpose for
which the ISE Trust was formed will not
be relevant after the Closing of the
Transaction, given that the Exchange
will no longer have Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners and that the Exchange’s current
and resulting U.S. upstream owners’
governing documents provide for
similar protections (e.g., U.S. Exchange
Holdings COI Article THIRTEENTH and
Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5).
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes
that the Trust Agreement will cease to
be stated policies, practices, or
interpretations of the Exchange and,
therefore, will cease to be considered
rules of the Exchange as of a date that
corresponds to the Closing date of the
Transaction.37 The Exchange also
proposes that, as of the Closing of the
Transaction, the parties to the Trust
Agreement would be permitted to take
the corporate steps necessary to repeal
the Trust Agreement and dissolve the
ISE Trust.
7. ISE Holdings COI
The ISE Holdings COI was amended
in 2007 in relation to the ownership of
¨
the Exchange by Deutsche Borse.38 At
36 See
SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6 at 71984.
current Trust Agreement is attached hereto
as Exhibit 5D. Section 8.2 of the Trust Agreement
provides, in part, that, for so long as ISE Holdings
controls, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, before
any amendment or repeal of any provision of the
Trust Agreement shall be effective, such
amendment or repeal shall be submitted to the
board of directors of the Exchange, as applicable,
and if such amendment or repeal must be filed with
or filed with and approved by the Commission
under Section 19 of the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder before such amendment or
repeal may be effectuated, then such amendment or
repeal shall not be effectuated until filed with or
filed with and approved by the Commission, as the
case may be. The Exchange notes that, according to
the terms of the Trust Agreement, Sections 6.1 and
6.2 thereof, which relate to limits on disclosure of
confidential information and certain permitted
disclosure, will survive the termination of the Trust
Agreement for a period of ten years.
38 See SR–ISE–2007–101, supra note 6.
37 The
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that time, provisions were added to the
ISE Holdings COI relating to the ISE
Trust to provide for an automatic
transfer of ISE Holdings’ shares to the
ISE Trust if a Person were to obtain an
ownership or voting interest in ISE
Holdings in excess of Voting Limits and
Ownership Limits, without obtaining
the approval of the Commission.
As described above, the Exchange is
proposing that the Trust Agreement will
cease to be considered rules of the
Exchange as of a date that corresponds
to the Closing date of the Transaction.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
remove provisions relating to the Trust
Agreement and the ISE Trust from the
ISE Holdings COI.39 The Exchange
proposes to reinstate certain provisions
of the ISE Holdings COI that existed
¨
prior to Deutsche Borse’s ownership of
ISE Holdings that were removed upon
introduction of the provisions relating
to the ISE Trust and the Trust
Agreement.40
The changes to the ISE Holdings COI
proposed herein would describe the
corrective treatment of ‘‘Excess Shares’’
(i.e., any sale, transfer, assignment or
pledge that, if effective would result in
any Person, either alone or together with
its Related Persons, owning shares in
excess of any of the Ownership Limits).
The proposed changes would apply
39 The proposed, amended ISE Holdings COI is
attached hereto as Exhibit 5E. Capitalized terms
used to describe the ISE Holdings COI that are not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
prescribed in the ISE Holdings COI. Article
FOURTEENTH of the ISE Holdings COI provides
that, for so long as U.S. Exchange Holdings shall
control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or
facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal
of any provision of the ISE Holdings COI shall be
effective, the same shall be submitted to the board
of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must
be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the
Commission before the same may be effective,
under Section 19 of the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be
effective until filed with, or filed with and
approved by, the Commission, as the case may be.
40 See, e.g., Exhibit 5A to SR–ISE–2007–101,
supra note 6. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 51029 (January 12, 2005), 70 FR 3233
(January 21, 2005) (SR–ISE–2004–29), through
which the Exchange, which was organized as a
corporation at that time (i.e., ‘‘ISE, Inc.’’), amended
its Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution at
that time in connection with the Exchange’s thencontemplated initial public offering. The Exchange
subsequently reorganized into a holding company
structure, whereby it became a limited liability
company, as it is so organized currently, and
whereby ISE Holdings became the sole owner of the
Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53705 (April 21, 2006), 71 FR 25260 (April 28,
2006) (SR–ISE–2006–04). As a result, and at the
time of the reorganization, the Exchange eliminated
the ‘‘ISE, Inc.’’ Certificate of Incorporation and
Constitution. The ISE Holdings COI and ISE
Holdings Bylaws were introduced at that time and
included substantially the same ownership and
voting limitations that had been contained in the
ISE, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation and
Constitution.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
corrective procedures if any Person,
alone or together with its Related
Persons, purports to sell, transfer, assign
or pledge any shares of ISE Holdings
stock in in violation of the Ownership
Limits. Specifically, any such sale,
transfer, assignment or pledge would be
void, and that number of shares in
excess of the Ownership Limits would
be deemed to have been transferred to
ISE Holdings, as ‘‘Special Trustee’’ of a
‘‘Charitable Trust’’ for the exclusive
benefit of a ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ to
be determined by ISE Holdings.41 These
corrective procedures also would apply
if there is any other event causing any
holder of ISE Holdings stock to exceed
the Ownership Limits, such as a
repurchase of shares by ISE Holdings.
The automatic transfer would be
deemed to be effective as of the close of
business on the business day prior to
the date of the violative transfer or other
event. The Special Trustee of the
Charitable Trust would be required to
sell the Excess Shares to a person whose
ownership of shares is not expected to
violate the Ownership Limits, subject to
the right of ISE Holdings to repurchase
those shares. The proposed changes to
the ISE Holdings COI are as follows: 42
• The Exchange proposes to delete
the current provisions in Article Fourth,
Sections III(a)(ii), III(a)(iii) and III(b)(i)
of the ISE Holdings COI that provide
that the ISE Holdings Board of Directors
shall deliver to the ISE Trust copies of
certain written notice and updates
thereto currently required under
Sections III(a)(ii) and III(a)(iii) of Article
FOURTH (i.e., if any Person at any time
owns, of record or beneficially, whether
directly or indirectly, five percent (5%)
or more of the then outstanding Voting
Shares).
• The Exchange proposes to adopt
new Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii)
41 ISE Holdings may also determine to appoint as
‘‘Special Trustee’’ any entity that is unaffiliated
with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related
Persons owning Excess Shares, and any successor
trustee appointed by ISE Holdings. Currently, the
ISE Trust would hold capital stock of ISE Holdings
in the event that a person obtains ownership or
voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of the
Ownership Limits or Voting Limits or in the event
of a Material Compliance Event. See SR–ISE–2007–
101, supra note 6, for a discussion of the ISE Trust,
including the operation thereof.
42 The Exchange is not proposing any changes to
the actual Ownership Limits or Voting Limits
specified in the current ISE Holdings COI. See
Article FOURTH, Sections III(a) and III(b) of the ISE
Holdings COI. The Exchange proposes to delete
certain defined terms from the ISE Holdings COI,
such as ‘‘ISE Trust,’’ ‘‘Trust Beneficiary’’ and
‘‘Trustee,’’ and replace them with new defined
terms within the ISE Holdings COI, such as
‘‘Charitable Trust,’’ ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ and
‘‘Special Trustee.’’ The Exchange also proposes to
renumber certain sections of the ISE Holdings COI
to account for proposed new and deleted sections
therein.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the ISE Holdings COI, which would
provide that, notwithstanding any other
provisions contained in the ISE
Holdings COI, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, any shares
of capital stock of ISE Holdings
(whether such shares are common stock
or preferred stock) not entitled to be
voted due to the restrictions set forth in
Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of
the ISE Holdings COI (and not waived
by the ISE Holdings Board of Directors
and approved by the Commission
pursuant to Section III(b)(i) of Article
FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI), shall
not be deemed to be outstanding for
purposes of determining a quorum or a
minimum vote required for the
transaction of any business at any
meeting of stockholders of ISE Holdings,
including, without limitation, when
specified business is to be voted on by
a class or a series voting as a class.
• As a result of the addition of new
Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) of
the ISE Holdings COI, the Exchange
proposes to renumber current Article
FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) as resulting
Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iv).
• The Exchange proposes several
changes to Article FOURTH, Section
III(c) of the ISE Holdings COI, which
relates to violations of any Ownership
Limits or Voting Limits and the
treatment of Excess Shares, including
the following:
• Addition of new text relating to the
designation as ‘‘Excess Shares’’ for any
shares held in excess of the relevant
Ownership Limits; such designation and
treatment being effective as of the close
of business on the business day prior to
the date of the purported transfer or
other event leading to such Excess
Shares.43
• Deletion of current text requiring
notification to the ISE Trust upon the
occurrence of certain events and the
transfer of Voting Shares to the ISE
Trust.44
• Addition of new text describing the
treatment of ‘‘Excess Shares’’ upon any
sale, transfer, assignment or pledge that,
if effective would result in any Person,
either alone or together with its Related
Persons, owning shares in excess of any
of the Ownership Limits. Specifically,
the Exchange proposes within new
Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(i) of the
ISE Holdings COI that any such
purported event shall be void ab initio
as to such Excess Shares, and the
intended transferee shall acquire no
rights in such Excess Shares. Such
Excess Shares shall be deemed to have
been transferred to ISE Holdings (or to
43 See
resulting Article FOURTH, Section III(c).
44 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30355
an entity appointed by ISE Holdings
that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings
and any Person or its Related Persons
owning such Excess Shares), as Special
Trustee of the Charitable Trust for the
exclusive benefit of the Charitable
Beneficiary or Beneficiaries.45
• Addition of new text describing the
treatment of dividends or other
distributions paid with respect to Excess
Shares.46
• Addition of new text describing the
handling of any distribution of assets
received in respect of the Excess Shares
in any liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of, or any distribution of the
assets of ISE Holdings.47
• Addition of new text describing the
authority of the Special Trustee with
respect to rescinding as void any votes
cast by a purported transferee or holder
of Excess Shares as well as recasting of
votes in accordance with the desires of
the Special Trustee acting for the benefit
of ISE Holdings.48
• Addition of new text describing the
sale by the Special Trustee, to a Person
or Persons designated by the Special
Trustee whose ownership of Voting
Shares will not violate any Ownership
Limit or Voting Limit, of Excess Shares
transferred to the Charitable Trust,
within 20 days of receiving notice from
ISE Holdings that Excess Shares have
been so transferred.49 Existing text
would be deleted that requires the
Trustees of the ISE Trust to use their
commercially reasonable efforts to sell
the Excess Shares upon receipt of
written instructions from the ISE Trust
Beneficiary. New text also would be
added describing the handling of any
proceeds of such a sale.
• Addition of new text describing that
Excess Shares shall be deemed to have
been offered for sale to ISE Holdings on
45 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(ii). The ‘‘Charitable Beneficiary’’ would be one
or more organizations described in Sections
170(b)(1)(A) or 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended from time to time. The
‘‘Charitable Trust’’ would be the trust established
for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary for
which ISE Holdings is the trustee. The ‘‘Special
Trustee’’ would be ISE Holdings, in its capacity as
trustee for the Charitable Trust, any entity
appointed by ISE Holdings that is unaffiliated with
ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons
owning Excess Shares, and any successor trustee
appointed by ISE Holdings.
46 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(iii).
47 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(iv).
48 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(v).
49 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(vi).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
30356
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the date of the transaction or event
resulting in such Excess Shares.50
• Deletion of current Article
FOURTH, Section III(c)(v), which
currently relates to the ISE Trust
Beneficiary’s right to reacquire Excess
Shares from the ISE Trust under certain
circumstances.
The Exchange is not proposing to
reinstate all of the ISE Holdings COI text
¨
that existed prior to Deutsche Borse’s
ownership of ISE Holdings, as certain of
such text would continue to not be
applicable, even after the Transaction,
given the Exchange’s resulting
ownership. For example, prior to
¨
Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE
Holdings, the ISE Holdings COI
contained certain provisions that dealt
with the publicly-traded nature of ISE
Holdings’ stock. This text was removed
from the ISE Holdings COI upon
¨
Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE
Holdings, as ISE Holdings’ stock ceased
to be publicly-traded.51 Therefore, the
Exchange is not proposing to reinstate
the following provisions of the ISE
Holdings COI that existed prior to
¨
Deutsche Borse’s ownership of ISE
Holdings relating to:
• Regulation 14A under the Act
(pertaining to solicitations of proxies).
• the treatment of transactions of ISE
Holdings stock on or through the
facilities of any national securities
exchange or national securities
association.
• inspection of the ISE Holdings
accounts and records by ISE Holdings
stockholders.
• stockholder voting to amend, repeal
or adopt provisions of the ISE Holdings
COI or the ISE Holdings Bylaws.
• stockholder action called at annual
or special meetings of stockholders.
• nominations for directors and the
election thereof.
The Exchange also is not proposing to
reinstate the ISE Holdings COI text that
¨
existed prior to Deutsche Borse’s
ownership of ISE Holdings that related
to changes in terminology used
throughout the ISE Holdings COI.52
Additionally, provisions of the ISE
Holdings COI that authorize shares of
capital stock of ISE Holdings have been
¨
amended since Deutsche Borse acquired
ownership of ISE Holdings.53 The
50 See proposed Article FOURTH, Section
III(c)(vii).
51 See Exhibit 5A to SR–ISE–2007–101, supra
note 6.
52 For example, the ISE Holdings COI currently
refers to Delaware General Corporation Law as
‘‘DGCL.’’ The Exchange would not reinstate the
prior ‘‘GCL’’ term that was used in the ISE Holdings
COI.
53 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No
73860 (December 17, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December
23, 2014) (SR–ISE–2014–44).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Exchange does not propose to amend
the text of the ISE Holdings COI relating
to share authorization. The Exchange
also does not propose to reinstate the
location or specific wording of text of
the ISE Holdings COI that was adjusted
¨
or relocated upon Deutsche Borse’s
ownership of ISE Holdings, but that
otherwise has the same practical effect
and meaning as it did prior to Deutsche
¨
Borse’s ownership of ISE Holdings.
7. U.S. Exchange Holdings COI
The Exchange proposes to remove the
reference to the Trust Agreement in
Article THIRTEENTH of the U.S.
Exchange Holdings COI. As proposed
herein, the Trust Agreement will cease
to be considered rules of the Exchange
as of the Closing of the Transaction and
would be repealed in connection with
the Transaction. The Exchange also
proposes to retitle the document as the
‘‘Fourth’’ Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of U.S.
Exchange Holdings and update the
effective date thereof.54
8. ISE Holdings Bylaws
The ISE Holdings COI Voting Limits
restrict any person, either alone or
together with its related persons, from
having voting control, either directly or
indirectly, over more than 20% of the
outstanding capital stock of ISE
Holdings. The ISE Holdings COI
Ownership Limits restrict any person,
either alone or together with its related
persons, from directly or indirectly
owning of record or beneficially more
than 40% of the outstanding capital
stock of ISE Holdings (or in the case of
any Exchange member, acting alone or
together with its related persons, from
directly or indirectly owning of record
or beneficially more than 20% of the
outstanding capital stock of ISE
Holdings).55
The ISE Holdings COI and the ISE
Holdings Bylaws provide that the board
of directors of ISE Holdings may waive
54 The proposed, amended U.S. Exchange
Holdings COI is attached hereto as Exhibit 5F.
Article SIXTEENTH of the U.S. Exchange Holdings
COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange
Holdings shall control, directly or indirectly, the
Exchange, or facility thereof, before any amendment
to or repeal of any provision of the U.S. Exchange
Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall be
submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange,
and if the same must be filed with, or filed with
and approved by, the Commission before the same
may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and
the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same
shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with
and approved by, the Commission, as the case may
be. The Exchange also proposes to amend the U.S.
Exchange Holdings COI to consistently refer to such
document as the ‘‘Restated Certificate,’’ which is a
defined term therein.
55 See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH,
Section III.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
these voting and ownership restrictions
in an amendment to the ISE Holdings
Bylaws if the board makes the following
three findings: (1) The waiver will not
impair the ability of the Exchange to
carry out its functions and
responsibilities as an exchange under
the Act and the rules thereunder; (2) the
waiver is otherwise in the best interests
of ISE Holdings, its stockholders, and
the Exchange; and (3) the waiver will
not impair the ability of the Commission
to enforce the Act. However, the board
of directors may not waive these voting
and ownership restrictions as they
apply to Exchange members. In
addition, the board of directors may not
waive these voting and ownership
restrictions if such waiver would result
in a person subject to a ‘‘statutory
disqualification’’ owning or voting
shares above the stated thresholds. Any
waiver of these voting and ownership
restrictions must be by way of an
amendment to the Bylaws approved by
the board of directors, which
amendment must be approved by the
Commission.56
Acting pursuant to this waiver
provision, the board of directors of ISE
Holdings has approved the amendment
to the ISE Holdings Bylaws to waive the
Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in
order to permit Nasdaq to indirectly
own 100% of the outstanding common
stock of ISE Holdings as of and after
Closing of the Transaction.57 In
adopting such amendment, the board of
directors of ISE Holdings made the
necessary determinations and approved
56 See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH,
Sections III(a)(i) and III(b)(i). Such amendment to
Holdings Bylaws must be filed with and approved
by the Commission under Section 19(b) of the Act
and become effective thereunder. In this regard,
Section 10.1 of the Bylaws provides that the Bylaws
may be amended, added to, rescinded or repealed
at any meeting of the Board of Directors of ISE
Holdings or meeting of the stockholders. With
respect to each national securities exchange
controlled, directly or indirectly, by ISE Holdings
(the ‘‘Controlled National Securities Exchanges’’),
or facility thereof, before any amendment to or
repeal of any provision of the Bylaws of ISE
Holdings shall be effective, the same shall be
submitted to the board of directors of each
Controlled National Securities Exchange, and if the
same must be filed with, or filed with and approved
by, the Commission before the same may be
effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be
effective until filed with, or filed with and
approved by, the Commission, as the case may be.
57 The proposed, amended ISE Holdings Bylaws
are attached hereto as Exhibit 5G. The proposed
amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws would also
clarify that Eurex Global Derivatives AG or ‘‘EGD,’’
which is referenced in Section 11.2 of the ISE
Holdings Bylaws, ceased to be an Upstream Owner
of the Exchange as a result of a prior transaction
that did not require an amendment to the ISE
Holdings Bylaws. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 73530 (November 5, 2014), 79 FR 77066
(December 17, 2014) (SR–ISE–2014–44).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the submission of the Proposed Rule
Change to the Commission. In so
waiving the applicable voting and
ownership restrictions, the board of
directors of ISE Holdings has
determined, with respect to Nasdaq,
that: (i) Such waiver will not impair the
ability of ISE Holdings and each
Controlled National Securities
Exchange, or facility thereof, to carry
out its respective functions and
responsibilities under the Act and the
rules promulgated thereunder; 58 (ii)
such waiver is otherwise in the best
interests of ISE Holdings, its
stockholders, and each Controlled
National Securities Exchange, or facility
thereof; 59 (iii) such waiver will not
impair the ability of the Commission to
enforce the Act; 60 (iv) neither Nasdaq
nor any of its Related Persons (as that
term is defined in the ISE Holdings COI)
are subject to any applicable ‘‘statutory
disqualification’’ (within the meaning of
Section 3(a)(39) of the Act); and (v)
neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related
Persons is a member (as such term is
defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Act)
of such Controlled National Securities
Exchange.
The Exchange will continue to
conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its
market and Members) in the manner
currently conducted and will not make
any changes to its regulated activities in
connection with the Transaction. In
addition, the Transaction will not
impair the ability of the Exchange’s, or
any facility thereof, to carry out their
respective functions and responsibilities
under the Act and will not impair the
ability of the Commission to enforce the
Act. The Exchange therefore seeks
approval of the waiver described herein
with respect to the Ownership Limits
and Voting Limits in order to permit
58 For example, the Exchange will continue to
conduct its regulated activities (including operating
and regulating its market and Members) in the
manner currently conducted and will not make any
changes to its regulated activities in connection
with the Transaction. The Exchange is not
proposing any amendments to its trading or
regulatory rules at this time relating to the
Transaction.
59 For example, the Transaction will produce a
stronger and more efficient infrastructure that will
have an improved ability to provide innovative
products and services.
60 For example, the Commission will continue to
have plenary regulatory authority over the
Exchange, as is currently the case, as well as
jurisdiction over the Exchange’s direct and indirect
owners with respect to activities related to the
Exchange. The Commission will continue to have
appropriate oversight tools to ensure that the
Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act
with respect to the Exchange, its direct and indirect
owners and their directors (where applicable),
officers, employees and agents to the extent they are
involved in the activities of the Exchange.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the
outstanding common stock of ISE
Holdings as of and after Closing of the
Transaction.
Summary
The Exchange will continue to
conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its
market and Members) in the manner
currently conducted and will not make
any changes to its regulated activities in
connection with the Transaction. The
Transaction will not impair the ability
of ISE Holdings, the Exchange, or any
facility thereof, to carry out their
respective functions and responsibilities
under the Act. Moreover, the
Transaction will not impair the ability
of the Commission to enforce the Act
with respect to the Exchange. As such,
the Commission’s plenary regulatory
authority over the Exchange will not be
affected by the approval of this
Proposed Rule Change. The Exchange is
requesting approval by the Commission
of changes proposed herein in order to
allow the Transaction to take place.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that this
proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)of the Act,61 in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(1) of the
Act,62 in particular, in that it enables the
Exchange to be so organized as to have
the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and
to enforce compliance by its exchange
members and persons associated with
its exchange members, with the
provisions of the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange. The Proposed Rule
Change is designed to enable the
Exchange to continue to have the
authority and ability to effectively fulfill
its self-regulatory duties pursuant to the
Act and the rules promulgated
thereunder. The Exchange will continue
to conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its
market and Members) in the manner
currently conducted and will not make
any changes to its regulated activities in
connection with the Transaction. Thus,
the Commission will continue to have
plenary regulatory authority over the
Exchange, as is currently the case, as
well as jurisdiction over the Exchange’s
direct and indirect owners with respect
to activities related to the Exchange. The
Proposed Rule Change is consistent
with and will facilitate an ownership
structure that will continue to provide
the Commission with appropriate
61 15
62 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
oversight tools to ensure that the
Commission will have the ability to
enforce the Act with respect to the
Exchange, its direct and indirect owners
and their directors (where applicable),
officers, employees and agents to the
extent they are involved in the activities
of the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that this
Proposed Rule Change furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 63 of the Act
because the Proposed Rule Change
would be consistent with and facilitate
a governance and regulatory structure
that is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the Proposed
Rule Change will continue to provide
the Commission and the Exchange with
access to necessary information that will
allow the Exchange to efficiently and
effectively enforce compliance with the
Act, as well as allow the Commission to
provide proper oversight, which will
ultimately promote just and equitable
principles of trade and protect investors.
Approval of this Proposed Rule
Change will enable ISE Holdings to
continue its operations and the
Exchange to continue its orderly
discharge of regulatory duties to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
In addition, the Exchange expects that
the Transaction will facilitate
efficiencies and innovation for clients
and efficient, transparent and wellregulated markets for issuers and
clients, thus removing impediments to,
and perfecting the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market
system. The Transaction will benefit
investors, the market as a whole, and
shareholders by, among other things,
enhancing competition among securities
venues and reducing costs. In particular,
63 15
Sfmt 4703
30357
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
30358
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
the Transaction will contribute to
streamlined and efficient operations,
thereby intensifying competition for
transaction order flow with other
exchange and non-exchange trading
centers, as well as potentially in other
areas, such as proprietary market data
products and listings. This enhanced
level of competition among trading
centers will benefit investors through
new or more competitive product
offerings and, ultimately, lower costs.
Furthermore, the Exchange will
continue to conduct its regulated
activities (including operating and
regulating its market and Members) in
the manner currently conducted and
will not make any changes to its
regulated activities in connection with
the Transaction. Therefore, the
Exchange believes that it will continue
to satisfy the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a
national securities exchange.
The Exchange believes it is consistent
with the Act to allow Nasdaq to become
the ultimate parent of the Exchange.
Neither Nasdaq nor any of its related
persons is subject to any statutory
disqualification or is a Member of the
Exchange. Moreover, the Nasdaq
governing documents include certain
provisions designed to maintain the
independence of the Exchange’s selfregulatory functions. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that Nasdaq’s
acquisition of ultimate ownership and
exercise of voting control of the
Exchange will not impair the ability of
the Commission or the Exchange to
discharge their respective
responsibilities under the Act.
Although Nasdaq will not carry out
regulatory functions, its activities with
respect to the operation of the Exchange
must be consistent with, and not
interfere with, the Exchange’s selfregulatory obligations. Nasdaq’s
governing documents include certain
provisions that are designed to maintain
the independence of the Exchange’s
self-regulatory functions, enable the
Exchange to operate in a manner that
complies with the U.S. federal securities
laws, including the objectives and
requirements of Sections 6(b) and 19(g)
of the Act,64 and facilitate the ability of
the Exchange and the Commission to
fulfill their regulatory and oversight
obligations under the Act. For example,
the Nasdaq governing documents
provide that Nasdaq will comply with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the
rules and regulations thereunder and
shall cooperate with the Commission
and the Exchange. Also, each board
64 15
U.S.C. 78f(b) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
member, officer, and employee of
Nasdaq, in discharging his or her
responsibilities, shall comply with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the
rules and regulations thereunder,
cooperate with the Commission, and
cooperate with the Exchange. In
discharging his or her responsibilities as
a board member of Nasdaq, each such
member must, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, take into
consideration the effect that Nasdaq’s
actions would have on the ability of the
Exchange to carry out its responsibilities
under the Act. In addition, Nasdaq, its
board members, officers and employees
shall give due regard to the preservation
of the independence of the selfregulatory function of the Exchange.
Further, Nasdaq (along with its
respective board members, officers, and
employees) and U.S. Exchange Holdings
agree to keep confidential, to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law, all
confidential information pertaining to
the self-regulatory function of the
Exchange, including, but not limited to,
confidential information regarding
disciplinary matters, trading data,
trading practices, and audit information,
contained in the books and records of
the Exchange and not use such
information for any non-regulatory
purposes.
In addition, Nasdaq’s books and
records relating to the activities of the
Exchange will at all times be made
available for, and books and records of
U.S. Exchange Holdings will be subject
at all times to, inspection and copying
by the Commission and the Exchange.
Books and records of U.S. Exchange
Holdings related to the activities of the
Exchange also will continue to be
maintained within the U.S. Moreover,
for so long as Nasdaq directly or
indirectly controls the Exchange, the
books, records, officers, directors (or
equivalent), and employees of Nasdaq
shall be deemed to be the books,
records, officers, directors, and
employees of the Exchange.
To the extent involved in the
activities of the Exchange, Nasdaq, its
board members, officers, and employees
irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of
the U.S. federal courts and the
Commission for purposes of any action
arising out of, or relating to, the
activities of the Exchange. Likewise,
U.S. Exchange Holdings, its officers and
directors, and employees whose
principal place of business and
residence is outside of the U.S., to the
extent such directors, officers, or
employees are involved in the activities
of the Exchange, irrevocably submit to
the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal
courts and the Commission for purposes
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of any action arising out of, or relating
to, the activities of the Exchange.
The Nasdaq governing documents, the
U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, and the
U.S. Exchange Holdings Bylaws require
that any change thereto must be
submitted to the Exchange’s Board. If
such change must be filed with, or filed
with and approved by, the Commission
under Section 19 of the Act and the
rules thereunder, then such change shall
not be effective until filed with, or filed
with and approved by, the Commission.
This requirement to submit changes to
the Exchange’s Board continues for so
long as Nasdaq or U.S. Exchange
Holdings, as applicable, directly or
indirectly, control the Exchange.
¨
As Deutsche Borse and Eurex
Frankfurt will both cease to be Non-U.S.
Upstream Owners of the Exchange upon
the Closing of the Transaction, the
Exchange believes that its proposal that
¨
the resolutions of Deutsche Borse and
Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange as of
a date that corresponds to the Closing
date of the Transaction is consistent
with the Act.
The purpose for which the ISE Trust
was formed will not be relevant after the
Closing of the Transaction, given that
the Exchange will no longer have NonU.S. Upstream Owners and that the
Exchange’s current and resulting U.S.
upstream owners’ governing documents
provide for similar protections (e.g.,
U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article
THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws
Section 12.5). Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that its proposal that
the Trust Agreement will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange as of
a date that corresponds to the Closing
date of the Transaction is consistent
with the Act.
Given the Exchange’s proposal to
repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve
the ISE Trust, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes to the ISE
Holdings COI are consistent with the
Act. The proposed changes would
delete provisions of the ISE Holdings
COI that will no longer be relevant and
would reinstate certain provisions of the
ISE Holdings COI that were removed
upon introduction of the provisions
relating to the ISE Trust and the Trust
Agreement.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,65 the Exchange believes that the
Proposed Rule Change would not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
65 15
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Indeed, the Exchange believes that the
Proposed Rule Change will enhance
competition among intermarket trading
venues, as the Exchange believes that
the Transaction will produce a stronger
and more efficient infrastructure that
will have an improved ability to provide
innovative products and services.
Moreover, the Exchange will continue to
conduct regulated activities (including
operating and regulating its market and
Members) of the type it currently
conducts, but will be able to do so in a
more efficient manner to the benefit of
its Members.
The Exchange’s conclusion that the
Proposed Rule Change would not result
in any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act is consistent
with the Commission’s prior
conclusions about similar combinations
involving multiple exchanges in a single
corporate family.66 In this regard, the
Exchange notes that the Exchange, and
its affiliates ISE Gemini and ISE
Mercury, function only as options
trading markets—they do not function
as equity trading markets or as clearing
agencies, as do certain of Nasdaq’s
existing subsidiaries.
The Exchange believes that there is
considerable support for a finding that
the Transaction is consistent with the
Act with respect to competition. 14
exchanges currently compete for options
trading business. Exchanges compete on
technology, market model, trading
venue, fees and fee structure.
Additionally, low switching costs allow
customers to easily move to another
exchange, which customers do
regularly, as reflected in constantly
varying market shares among the
existing exchange operators. In addition,
the Commission has approved several,
new registered options exchanges in
recent history, which highlights an
increase in competition in the market
for listed options trading.67
66 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
66071 (Dec. 29, 2011), 77 FR 521 (Jan. 05, 2012)
(SR–CBOE–2011–107 and SR–NSX–2011–14);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324 (Aug. 7,
2008), 73 FR 46936 (Aug. 12, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008–
02; SR–BSE–2008–23; SR–BSE–2008–25; SR–
BSECC–2008–01); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 53382 (Feb. 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (Mar. 06,
2006) (SR–NYSE–2005–77); Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 71449 (Jan. 30, 2014), 79 FR 6961
(Feb. 05, 2014) (SR–EDGA–2013–34; SR–EDGX–
2013–43); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
66171 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23,
2012) (File Nos. SR–EDGA–2011–34; SR–EDGX–
2011–33; SR–ISE–2011–69; SR–NYSE–2011–51;
SR–NYSEAmex–2011–78; SR–NYSEArca–2011–
72).
67 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
76998 (January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066 (February 4,
2016) (Order approving application for exchange
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Exchange believes that the
Transaction will not change the
competitive landscape for listed options
trading and the changes proposed
herein are consistent with other recent
Commission approvals. For example, a
similar proposed combination of
¨
Deutsche Borse and NYSE Euronext in
2011 received Commission approval
and would have resulted in a combined
greater than 40% market share of listed
options volume among its three,
respective options exchanges (based on
2010 data).68 Similarly, as a result of the
Transaction, the options exchanges
owned by Nasdaq would account for
approximately 41% aggregate market
share of listed options volume.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the publication date
of this notice or within such longer
period (1) as the Commission may
designate up to 45 days of such date if
it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons
for so finding or (2) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the
Commission will:
(A) By order approve such Proposed
Rule Change; or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the Proposed Rule Change
should be disapproved.
registration of ISE Mercury, LLC); 75650 (August 7,
2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015) (Order
approving rules governing the trading of options on
the EDGX Options Market); 70050 (July 26, 2013),
78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (Order approving
application for exchange registration of Topaz
Exchange, LLC (n/k/a ISE Gemini, LLC)); 68341
(December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065 (December 7,
2012) (Order approving application for exchange
registration of Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC); 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR
5157 (February 1, 2010) (Order approving rules
governing the trading of options on the BATS
Options Exchange).
68 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171
(January 17, 2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23, 2012)
(File Nos. SR–EDGA–2011–34; SR–EDGX–2011–33;
SR–ISE–2011–69; SR–NYSE–2011–51; SR–
NYSEAmex–2011–78; SR–NYSEArca–2011–72).
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30359
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2016–11 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2016–11. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal offices of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2016–11, and should be submitted on or
June 6, 2016.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
30360
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.69
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–11405 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77790; File No. SR–
BatsBYX–2016–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats
BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
11.13, Order Execution and Routing,
To Delete the IOCM and ICMT Routing
Options
May 10, 2016.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on May 2, 2016, Bats BYX Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated this proposal
as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder,4 which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rule 11.13, Order Execution and
Routing, to delete the IOCM and ICMT
routing options. The Exchange also
proposes to amend its fee schedule to
delete: (i) References to the IOCM and
ICMT routing options under footnote 8;
and (ii) fee code PX, which is yielded
on orders routed using the RMPT
routing option or routed to Bats EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’) to execute
against MidPoint Peg Orders 5 on EDGX
using ICMT or IOCM routing options.
69 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
5 See EDGX Rule 11.8(d). The BYX fee schedule
uses the term ‘‘EDGX MPM’’ for fee code PX. EDGX
MPM is intended to refer to contra side MidPoint
Peg Orders on EDGX.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 11.13, Order Execution and
Routing, to delete the IOCM and ICMT
routing options. The Exchange also
proposes to amend its fee schedule to
delete: (i) References to the IOCM and
ICMT routing options under footnote 8;
and (ii) fee code PX, which is yielded
on orders routed using the RMPT
routing option or routed to EDGX to
execute against MidPoint Peg Orders on
EDGX using ICMT or IOCM routing
options.
Under Rule 11.13(b)(3)(O), an order
utilizing the IOCM routing option
checks the System 6 for available shares
and then is sent, as MidPoint Peg Order
with a Time-in-Force of IOC, to EDGX.
Under Rule 11.13(b)(3)(P), an order
utilizing the ICMT routing option
checks the System for available shares,
then is sent to destinations on the
System routing table and then is sent, as
MidPoint Peg Order with a Time-inForce of IOC, to EDGX. If shares remain
unexecuted after routing pursuant to
both the IOCM and ICMT routing
options, they are posted on the book,
unless otherwise instructed by the
User.7
6 The ‘‘System’’ is the Exchange’s electronic
communications and trading facility designated by
the Board through which securities orders of Users
are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when
applicable, routing away. See Exchange Rule
1.5(aa).
7 The term ‘‘User’’ is defined as ‘‘any Member or
Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain
access to the System pursuant to Rule 11.3.’’ See
Exchange Rule 1.5(cc).
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Footnote 8 of the fee schedule states
that orders in securities priced below
$1.00 that remove liquidity utilizing
certain routing strategies, including
IOCM and ICMT are charged a fee of
$0.29% of the trade’s total dollar value.
Fee code PX is yielded on orders routed
using the RMPT routing option or
routed to EDGX to execute against
MidPoint Peg Orders on EDGX using
ICMT or IOCM routing options. Orders
that yield fee code PX pay a fee of
$0.0012 per share in securities priced at
or above $1.00 and 0.29% of the trade’s
dollar value for securities priced below
$1.00.
Because few Users elect the IOCM or
ICMT routing options, the Exchange has
determined that the current demand
does not warrant the infrastructure and
ongoing maintenance expenses required
to support the products. Therefore, the
Exchange proposes to delete the IOCM
and ICMT routing options under Rule
11.13(b)(3)(O) and (P) as well as a
reference to the IOCM and ICMT routing
options under Rule 11.13(b)(3)(H). The
Exchange also proposes to amend its fee
schedule to delete: (i) References to the
IOCM and ICMT routing options under
footnote 8; and (ii) fee code PX, which
is yielded on orders routed using the
RMPT routing option or routed to EDGX
to execute against MidPoint Peg Orders
on EDGX using ICMT or IOCM routing
options. Users seeking to route midpoint
eligible orders to EDGX may use
alternative methods, such as connecting
to EDGX directly or through a third
party service provider, or electing
another routing option offered by the
Exchange that enables a User to post an
order to certain primary listing
markets.8
The Exchange intends to implement
the proposed rule change on May 5,
2016.9
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 10 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 11
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
8 See e.g., Rule 11.13(b)(3)(Q) (describing the
RMPT routing option under which a Mid-Point Peg
Order checks the System for available shares and
any remaining shares are then sent to destinations
on the System routing table that support midpoint
eligible orders. If any shares remain unexecuted
after routing, they are posted on the BYX book as
a MidPoint Peg Order, unless otherwise instructed
by the User).
9 See Bats to Decommission ICMT, IOCM, and
TRIM3 Routing Strategies, issued April 18, 2016,
available at https://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/
release_notes/2016/Bats-to-Decommission-ICMTIOCM-and-TRIM3-Routing-Strategies.pdf.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30351-30360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11405]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-77794; File No. SR-ISE-2016-11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to a Corporate
Transaction Involving Its Indirect Parent
May 10, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 28, 2016 International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes is hereby filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change (the
``Proposed Rule Change'') in connection with a proposed business
transaction (the ``Transaction'') involving the Exchange's ultimate,
indirect, non-U.S. upstream owners, Deutsche B[ouml]rse AG (``Deutsche
B[ouml]rse'') and Eurex Frankfurt AG (``Eurex Frankfurt''), and Nasdaq,
Inc. (``Nasdaq''). Nasdaq is the parent company of The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (``NASDAQ Exchange''), NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx Exchange''),
NASDAQ BX, Inc. (``BX Exchange''), Boston Stock Exchange Clearing
Corporation (``BSECC'') and Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia
(``SCCP'').\3\ Upon completion of the Transaction (the ``Closing''),
the Exchange's indirect parent company, U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc.
(``U.S. Exchange Holdings''), will become a direct subsidiary of
Nasdaq. The Exchange will therefore become an indirect subsidiary of
Nasdaq and, in addition to the Exchange's current affiliation with ISE
Gemini, LLC (``ISE Gemini'') and ISE Mercury, LLC (``ISE Mercury''), an
affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and
SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. Nasdaq will become
the ultimate parent of the Exchange.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58179 (July 17,
2008), 73 FR 42874 (July 23, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-31); 58324 (August
7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-
2008-23; SR-BSE-2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01).
\4\ The Exchange's current affiliates, ISE Gemini and ISE
Mercury, have submitted nearly identical proposed rule changes. See
SR-ISEGemini-2016-05 and SR-ISEMercury-2016-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to effect the Transaction, the Exchange hereby seeks the
Commission's approval of the following: (i) That certain corporate
resolutions that were previously established by entities that will
cease to be non-U.S. upstream owners of the Exchange after the
Transaction will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange upon
Closing; (ii) that certain governing documents of Nasdaq will be
considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing; (iii) that the Third
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the ``Trust Agreement'') that
currently exists among International Securities Exchange Holdings, Inc.
(``ISE Holdings''), U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as
defined therein) with respect to the ``ISE Trust'' will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange upon Closing and, thereafter, that the
parties to the Trust Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate
steps necessary to repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE
Trust; (iv) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of ISE Holdings (``ISE Holdings COI'') to
eliminate provisions relating to the Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust
and, in this respect, to reinstate certain text of the ISE Holdings COI
that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings;
(v) to amend and restate the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of ISE
Holdings (the ``ISE Holdings Bylaws'') to waive certain voting and
ownership restrictions in the ISE Holdings COI to permit Nasdaq to
indirectly own 100% of the outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings as
of and after Closing of the Transaction; and (vi) to amend and restate
the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S.
Exchange Holdings (``U.S. Exchange Holdings COI'') to eliminate
references therein to the Trust Agreement.
The Exchange requests that the Proposed Rule Change become
operative at the Closing of the Transaction. The text of the proposed
rule change is available at the Commission's Public Reference Room and
on the Exchange's Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange submits this Proposed Rule Change to seek the
Commission's approval of various changes to the organizational and
governance documents of the Exchange's current owners and related
actions that are necessary in connection with the Closing of the
Transaction, as described below. The Exchange will continue to conduct
its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market
and Members) in the manner
[[Page 30352]]
currently conducted and will not make any changes to its regulated
activities in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange is not
proposing any amendments to its trading or regulatory rules at this
time relating to the Transaction.\5\ The Exchange would continue to be
registered as a national securities exchange, with separate rules,
membership rosters, and listings, distinct from the rules, membership
rosters, and listings of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange and BX Exchange
as well as from its current affiliates, ISE Gemini and ISE Mercury.
Neither the Exchange nor its current affiliates engage in clearing
securities transactions, nor would they do so after the Transaction.
Additionally, the Exchange would continue to be a separate self-
regulatory organization (``SRO'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ If the Exchange determines to make any such changes, it will
seek the approval of the Commission only after the approval of this
Proposed Rule Change to the extent required by the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), the Commission's rules
thereunder, or the Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Current Ownership Structure of the Exchange
On December 17, 2007, ISE Holdings, the sole, direct parent of the
Exchange, became a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Exchange
Holdings.\6\ U.S. Exchange Holdings is 85% directly owned by Eurex
Frankfurt and 15% directly owned by Deutsche B[ouml]rse. Eurex
Frankfurt is a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Deutsche
B[ouml]rse.\7\ Deutsche B[ouml]rse therefore owns 100% of U.S. Exchange
Holdings through its aggregate direct and indirect ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56955 (December 13,
2007), 72 FR 71979 (December 19, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-101).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66834 (April 19,
2012), 77 FR 24752 (April 25, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-21). Each of
Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt is referred to as a ``Non-
U.S. Upstream Owner'' and collectively as the ``Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The Transaction
On March 9, 2016, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the ``Agreement'')
was entered into among Deutsche B[ouml]rse, Eurex Frankfurt and Nasdaq.
Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Agreement, at the Closing,
Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will sell, transfer and deliver
to Nasdaq, and Nasdaq will purchase, the capital stock of U.S. Exchange
Holdings.
3. Post-Closing Ownership Structure of the Exchange
As a result of the Transaction, Nasdaq will directly own 100% of
the equity interest of U.S. Exchange Holdings. U.S. Exchange Holdings
will remain the sole, direct owner of ISE Holdings. ISE Holdings will
remain the sole, direct owner of the Exchange. The Exchange will
therefore become an indirect subsidiary of Nasdaq and Nasdaq will
become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. The Exchange will become an
affiliate of NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx Exchange, BX Exchange, BSECC and
SCCP through common, ultimate ownership by Nasdaq. As a result of the
Transaction, Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be
owners of the Exchange. The Exchange will therefore cease to have any
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners. The Transaction will not have any effect on
ISE Holdings' direct ownership of the Exchange. However, consummation
of the Transaction is subject to approval of this Proposed Rule Change
by the Commission, as described below.
4. Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions
Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt, as the Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners of the Exchange, have previously taken appropriate steps to
incorporate provisions regarding ownership, jurisdiction, books and
records, and other issues related to their control of the Exchange.
Specifically, each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners has adopted
resolutions (``Non-U.S. Upstream Owner Resolutions''), which were
previously approved by the Commission, to incorporate these concepts
with respect to itself, as well as its board members, officers,
employees, and agents (as applicable), to the extent that they are
involved in the activities of the Exchange.\8\ For example, the
resolution of each of such Non-U.S. Upstream Owners provides that it
shall comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and
regulations thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and with
the Exchange. In addition, the resolution of each of such Non-U.S.
Upstream Owners provides that the board members, including each person
who becomes a board member, would so consent to comply and cooperate
and the particular Non-U.S. Upstream Owner would take reasonable steps
to cause its officers, employees, and agents to also comply and
cooperate, to the extent that he or she is involved in the activities
of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6; SR-ISE-2012-21, supra
note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b) of the Act,\9\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\10\ require
an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the Commission. Although the
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners are not SROs, the Non-U.S. Upstream Owner
Resolutions have previously been filed with the Commission as stated
policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore
are considered rules of the Exchange.\11\ As Deutsche B[ouml]rse and
Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the
Exchange after the Transaction, the Exchange proposes that the
resolutions of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be
stated policies, practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and,
therefore, will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a
date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\11\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6 at 71981.
\12\ The ``Form of German Parent Corporation Resolutions'' is
attached hereto as Exhibit 5A. As referenced above, resolutions in
relation to board members, officers, employees, and agents (as
applicable) of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt also would
cease accordingly. Resolution 11 provides that, notwithstanding any
provision of the resolutions, before: (a) Any amendment to or repeal
of any provision of this or any of the resolutions; or (b) any
action that would have the effect of amending or repealing any
provision of the resolutions shall be effective, the same shall be
submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same
must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission
before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and
the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the
Commission, as the case may be. In addition, Deutsche B[ouml]rse,
Eurex Frankfurt, U.S. Exchange Holdings, ISE Holdings, and the
Exchange previously became parties to an agreement to provide for
adequate funding for the Exchange's regulatory responsibilities. ISE
Gemini and ISE Mercury subsequently became parties to the agreement.
This agreement will be terminated upon the Closing of the
Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Nasdaq Governing Documents
Nasdaq will become the ultimate parent of the Exchange upon the
Closing of the Transaction. As described above, Section 19(b) of the
Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule
changes with the Commission. Although the Exchange's existing U.S.
upstream owners are not SROs, their governing documents have previously
been filed with the Commission as stated policies, practices, or
interpretations of the Exchange and therefore are considered rules of
the Exchange.\13\ The Exchange proposes that the Nasdaq Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (``Nasdaq COI'') and the Nasdaq
Bylaws (``Nasdaq Bylaws, and together with the Nasdaq COI, the ``Nasdaq
governing documents'') will become stated policies, practices, or
interpretations of the Exchange as of the Closing and,
[[Page 30353]]
therefore, will be considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that
corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6 at 71981.
\14\ The Nasdaq COI dated January 24, 2014 is attached hereto as
Exhibit 5B along with subsequent amendments thereto dated November
17, 2014 and September 8, 2015 and the Certificate of Elimination of
the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dated January 27, 2014. The
Nasdaq Bylaws are attached hereto as Exhibit 5C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Nasdaq Bylaws contain certain provisions regarding ownership,
jurisdiction, books and records, and other issues, with respect to
Nasdaq, as well as its board members, officers, employees, and agents
(as applicable), relating to Nasdaq's control of any ``Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary'' (i.e., any subsidiary of Nasdaq that is an SRO as defined
under Section 3(a)(26) of the Act).\15\ The Exchange would be a ``Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary'' of Nasdaq upon the Closing of the Transaction.
The provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws are comparable to the provisions of
the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners Resolutions, including in the following
manner:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Giving due regard to the preservation of the independence
of the self-regulatory function of each of Nasdaq's Self-Regulatory
Subsidiaries.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(a) (Self-Regulatory Organization
Functions of the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining the confidentiality of all books and records
of each Self-Regulatory Subsidiary reflecting confidential information
pertaining to the self-regulatory function of such Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary (including but not limited to disciplinary matters, trading
data, trading practices and audit information) that comes into Nasdaq's
possession, which shall not be used for any non-regulatory purposes;
making such books and records available for inspection and copying by
the Commission; and maintaining such books and records relating to each
Self-Regulatory Subsidiary in the United States.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent they are related to the activities of a
Self-Regulatory Subsidiary, the books, records, premises, officers,
Directors, and employees of Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books,
records, premises, officers, directors, and employees of such Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of, and subject to oversight
pursuant to, the Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.1(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance by Nasdaq with the U.S. federal securities laws
and the rules and regulations thereunder, cooperation by Nasdaq with
the Commission and Nasdaq's Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries, and
reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its agents to cooperate
with the Commission and, where applicable, the Self-Regulatory
Subsidiaries pursuant to their regulatory authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.2(a) (Cooperation with the
Commission). The officers, Directors, and employees of Nasdaq, by
virtue of their acceptance of such position, shall be deemed to
agree to cooperate with the Commission and each Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary in respect of the Commission's oversight responsibilities
regarding the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries and the self-regulatory
functions and responsibilities of the Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries.
Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.2(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consent by Nasdaq and its officers, Directors, and
employees to the jurisdiction of the United States federal courts, the
Commission, and each Self-Regulatory Subsidiary for the purposes of any
suit, action or proceeding pursuant to the United States federal
securities laws, and the rules and regulations thereunder, arising out
of, or relating to, the activities of any Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.3 (Consent to Jurisdiction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable steps by Nasdaq necessary to cause its current
and future officers, Directors, and employees, to consent in writing to
the applicability to them of certain provisions of the Nasdaq Bylaws,
as applicable, with respect to their activities related to any Self-
Regulatory Subsidiary.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.4 (Further Assurances).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval by the Commission under Section 19 of the Act
prior to any resolution of the Nasdaq Board to approve an exemption for
any person from the ownership limitations of the Nasdaq COI.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5 (Board Action with Respect to
Voting Limitations of the Certificate of Incorporation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing with, or filing with and approval by, the
Commission (as the case may be) under Section 19 of the Act prior to
amending the Nasdaq COI or the Nasdaq Bylaws.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.6 (Amendments to the Certificate
of Incorporation); Nasdaq Bylaws Section 11.3 (Review by Self-
Regulatory Subsidiaries).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the provisions in the Nasdaq Bylaws
should minimize the potential that a person could improperly interfere
with, or restrict the ability of, the Commission or the Exchange to
effectively carry out their regulatory oversight responsibilities under
the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ The U.S. Exchange Holdings COI also includes similar
provisions, including that U.S. Exchange Holdings will take
reasonable steps necessary to cause ISE Holdings to be in compliance
with the ``Ownership Limit'' and the ``Voting Limit.'' See U.S.
Exchange Holdings COI, Articles TENTH through SIXTEENTH. The U.S.
Exchange Holdings COI provides that U.S. Exchange Holdings will
notify the Exchange's Board if any ``Person,'' either alone or
together with its ``Related Persons,'' at any time owns (whether by
acquisition or by a change in the number of shares outstanding) of
record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, 10%, 15%,
20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, or 40% or more of the then outstanding shares of
U.S. Exchange Holdings. See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6, at 71981.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, and similar to the ISE Holdings COI, the Nasdaq COI
imposes limits on direct and indirect changes in control, which are
designed to prevent any shareholder from exercising undue control over
the operation of its SRO subsidiaries and to ensure that its SRO
subsidiaries and the Commission are able to carry out their regulatory
obligations under the Act. Specifically, no person who beneficially
owns shares of common stock, preferred stock, or notes of Nasdaq in
excess of 5% of the securities generally entitled to vote may vote the
shares in excess of 5%.\25\ This limitation would mitigate the
potential for any Nasdaq shareholder to exercise undue control over the
operations of the Exchange, and it facilitates the Exchange's and the
Commission's ability to carry out their regulatory obligations under
the Act. The Nasdaq Board may approve exemptions from the 5% voting
limitation for any person that is not a broker-dealer, an affiliate of
a broker-dealer, or a person subject to a statutory disqualification
under Section 3(a)(39) of the Act,\26\ provided that the Nasdaq Board
also determines that granting such exemption would be consistent with
the self-regulatory obligations of its SRO subsidiary.\27\ Further, any
such exemption from the 5% voting limitation would not be effective
until approved by the Commission pursuant to Section 19 of the Act.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Article FOURTH, Section C of the Nasdaq COI.
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39).
\27\ See Article FOURTH, Section C.6. of the Nasdaq COI.
Specifically, the Nasdaq Board must determine that granting such
exemption would (1) not reasonably be expected to diminish the
quality of, or public confidence in, Nasdaq or the other operations
of Nasdaq, on the ability to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices and on investors and the public, and (2) promote
just and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to an facilitating transactions
in securities or assist in the removal of impediments to or
perfection of the mechanisms for a free and open market and a
national market system.
\28\ See Section 12.5 of the Nasdaq Bylaws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Trust Agreement \29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ The Trust Agreement exists among ISE Holdings, U.S.
Exchange Holdings, and the Trustees (as defined therein). By its
terms, the Trust Agreement originally related solely to ISE
Holdings' ownership of ISE, and not to any other national securities
exchange that ISE Holdings might control, directly or indirectly. In
2010, the Commission approved proposed rule changes that revised the
Trust Agreement to replace references to ISE with references to any
Controlled National Securities Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 59135 (December 22, 2008), 73 FR 79954 (December 30,
2008) (SR-ISE-2008-85) and 61498 (February 4, 2010), 75 FR 7299
(February 18, 2010) (SR-ISE-2009-90); see also ISE Trust Agreement,
Articles I and II, Sections 1.1 and 2.6. Thus, the ISE Trust
Agreement also applies to ISE Gemini and ISE Mercury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ISE Holdings COI currently contains certain ownership limits
[[Page 30354]]
(``Ownership Limits'') and voting limits (``Voting Limits'') with
respect to the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings.\30\ The Trust
Agreement was entered into in 2007 to provide for an automatic transfer
of ISE Holdings shares to a trust (the ``ISE Trust'') if a Person \31\
were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in
excess of these Ownership Limits and Voting Limits, through ownership
of one of the Non-U.S. Upstream Owners, without obtaining the approval
of the Commission. In this regard, the Trust Agreement serves four
general purposes: (i) To accept, hold and dispose of Trust Shares \32\
on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein; (ii) to
determine whether a Material Compliance Event \33\ has occurred or is
continuing; (iii) to determine whether the occurrence and continuation
of a Material Compliance Event requires the exercise of the Call
Option; \34\ and (iv) to transfer Deposited Shares from the Trust to
the Trust Beneficiary \35\ as provided in Section 4.2(h) therein. The
ISE Trust, and corresponding Trust Agreement, is the mechanism by which
the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in the ISE Holdings COI
currently would be protected in the event that a Non-US Upstream Owner
purportedly transfers any related ownership or voting rights other than
in accordance with the ISE Holdings COI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See Article FOURTH, Section III of the ISE Holdings COI.
\31\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6. Under the Trust
Agreement, the term ``Person'' means any individual, corporation
(including not-for-profit), general or limited partnership, limited
liability company, joint venture, estate, trust, association,
organization, government or any agency or political subdivision
thereof, or any other entity of any kind or nature.
\32\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Trust Shares'' means
either Excess Shares or Deposited Shares, or both, as the case may
be. The term ``Excess Shares'' means that a Person obtained an
ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in excess of certain
ownership and voting restrictions pursuant to Article FOURTH of the
ISE Holdings COI, through, for example, ownership of one of the Non-
U.S. Upstream Owners or U.S. Exchange Holdings, without obtaining
the approval of the Commission. The term ``Deposited Shares'' means
shares that are transferred to the Trust pursuant to the Trust's
exercise of the Call Option.
\33\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Material Compliance
Event'' means, with respect to a Non-U.S. Upstream Owner, any state
of facts, development, event, circumstance, condition, occurrence or
effect that results in the failure of any of the Non-U.S. Upstream
Owners to adhere to their respective commitments under the
resolutions (i.e., as referenced in note 7) in any material respect.
\34\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Call Option'' means
the option granted by the Trust Beneficiary to the Trust to call the
Voting Shares as set forth in Section 4.2 therein.
\35\ Under the Trust Agreement, the term ``Trust Beneficiary''
means U.S. Exchange Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, Section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b-4
thereunder require an SRO to file proposed rule changes with the
Commission. Although the ISE Trust is not an SRO, the Trust Agreement
has previously been filed with the Commission as stated policies,
practices, or interpretations of the Exchange and therefore is
considered rules of the Exchange.\36\ The purpose for which the ISE
Trust was formed will not be relevant after the Closing of the
Transaction, given that the Exchange will no longer have Non-U.S.
Upstream Owners and that the Exchange's current and resulting U.S.
upstream owners' governing documents provide for similar protections
(e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws
Section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes that the Trust
Agreement will cease to be stated policies, practices, or
interpretations of the Exchange and, therefore, will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the
Closing date of the Transaction.\37\ The Exchange also proposes that,
as of the Closing of the Transaction, the parties to the Trust
Agreement would be permitted to take the corporate steps necessary to
repeal the Trust Agreement and dissolve the ISE Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6 at 71984.
\37\ The current Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit
5D. Section 8.2 of the Trust Agreement provides, in part, that, for
so long as ISE Holdings controls, directly or indirectly, the
Exchange, before any amendment or repeal of any provision of the
Trust Agreement shall be effective, such amendment or repeal shall
be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, as
applicable, and if such amendment or repeal must be filed with or
filed with and approved by the Commission under Section 19 of the
Act and the rules promulgated thereunder before such amendment or
repeal may be effectuated, then such amendment or repeal shall not
be effectuated until filed with or filed with and approved by the
Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange notes that, according
to the terms of the Trust Agreement, Sections 6.1 and 6.2 thereof,
which relate to limits on disclosure of confidential information and
certain permitted disclosure, will survive the termination of the
Trust Agreement for a period of ten years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. ISE Holdings COI
The ISE Holdings COI was amended in 2007 in relation to the
ownership of the Exchange by Deutsche B[ouml]rse.\38\ At that time,
provisions were added to the ISE Holdings COI relating to the ISE Trust
to provide for an automatic transfer of ISE Holdings' shares to the ISE
Trust if a Person were to obtain an ownership or voting interest in ISE
Holdings in excess of Voting Limits and Ownership Limits, without
obtaining the approval of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange is proposing that the Trust
Agreement will cease to be considered rules of the Exchange as of a
date that corresponds to the Closing date of the Transaction.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to remove provisions relating to the
Trust Agreement and the ISE Trust from the ISE Holdings COI.\39\ The
Exchange proposes to reinstate certain provisions of the ISE Holdings
COI that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE
Holdings that were removed upon introduction of the provisions relating
to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ The proposed, amended ISE Holdings COI is attached hereto
as Exhibit 5E. Capitalized terms used to describe the ISE Holdings
COI that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
prescribed in the ISE Holdings COI. Article FOURTEENTH of the ISE
Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange Holdings
shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or facility
thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision of the
ISE Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall be submitted to
the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the same must be
filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission before the
same may be effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until
filed with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the
case may be.
\40\ See, e.g., Exhibit 5A to SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51029 (January 12, 2005),
70 FR 3233 (January 21, 2005) (SR-ISE-2004-29), through which the
Exchange, which was organized as a corporation at that time (i.e.,
``ISE, Inc.''), amended its Certificate of Incorporation and
Constitution at that time in connection with the Exchange's then-
contemplated initial public offering. The Exchange subsequently
reorganized into a holding company structure, whereby it became a
limited liability company, as it is so organized currently, and
whereby ISE Holdings became the sole owner of the Exchange. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53705 (April 21, 2006), 71 FR
25260 (April 28, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-04). As a result, and at the
time of the reorganization, the Exchange eliminated the ``ISE,
Inc.'' Certificate of Incorporation and Constitution. The ISE
Holdings COI and ISE Holdings Bylaws were introduced at that time
and included substantially the same ownership and voting limitations
that had been contained in the ISE, Inc. Certificate of
Incorporation and Constitution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The changes to the ISE Holdings COI proposed herein would describe
the corrective treatment of ``Excess Shares'' (i.e., any sale,
transfer, assignment or pledge that, if effective would result in any
Person, either alone or together with its Related Persons, owning
shares in excess of any of the Ownership Limits). The proposed changes
would apply
[[Page 30355]]
corrective procedures if any Person, alone or together with its Related
Persons, purports to sell, transfer, assign or pledge any shares of ISE
Holdings stock in in violation of the Ownership Limits. Specifically,
any such sale, transfer, assignment or pledge would be void, and that
number of shares in excess of the Ownership Limits would be deemed to
have been transferred to ISE Holdings, as ``Special Trustee'' of a
``Charitable Trust'' for the exclusive benefit of a ``Charitable
Beneficiary'' to be determined by ISE Holdings.\41\ These corrective
procedures also would apply if there is any other event causing any
holder of ISE Holdings stock to exceed the Ownership Limits, such as a
repurchase of shares by ISE Holdings. The automatic transfer would be
deemed to be effective as of the close of business on the business day
prior to the date of the violative transfer or other event. The Special
Trustee of the Charitable Trust would be required to sell the Excess
Shares to a person whose ownership of shares is not expected to violate
the Ownership Limits, subject to the right of ISE Holdings to
repurchase those shares. The proposed changes to the ISE Holdings COI
are as follows: \42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ ISE Holdings may also determine to appoint as ``Special
Trustee'' any entity that is unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any
Person or its Related Persons owning Excess Shares, and any
successor trustee appointed by ISE Holdings. Currently, the ISE
Trust would hold capital stock of ISE Holdings in the event that a
person obtains ownership or voting interest in ISE Holdings in
excess of the Ownership Limits or Voting Limits or in the event of a
Material Compliance Event. See SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6, for a
discussion of the ISE Trust, including the operation thereof.
\42\ The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the actual
Ownership Limits or Voting Limits specified in the current ISE
Holdings COI. See Article FOURTH, Sections III(a) and III(b) of the
ISE Holdings COI. The Exchange proposes to delete certain defined
terms from the ISE Holdings COI, such as ``ISE Trust,'' ``Trust
Beneficiary'' and ``Trustee,'' and replace them with new defined
terms within the ISE Holdings COI, such as ``Charitable Trust,''
``Charitable Beneficiary'' and ``Special Trustee.'' The Exchange
also proposes to renumber certain sections of the ISE Holdings COI
to account for proposed new and deleted sections therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to delete the current provisions in
Article Fourth, Sections III(a)(ii), III(a)(iii) and III(b)(i) of the
ISE Holdings COI that provide that the ISE Holdings Board of Directors
shall deliver to the ISE Trust copies of certain written notice and
updates thereto currently required under Sections III(a)(ii) and
III(a)(iii) of Article FOURTH (i.e., if any Person at any time owns, of
record or beneficially, whether directly or indirectly, five percent
(5%) or more of the then outstanding Voting Shares).
The Exchange proposes to adopt new Article FOURTH, Section
III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, which would provide that,
notwithstanding any other provisions contained in the ISE Holdings COI,
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any shares of
capital stock of ISE Holdings (whether such shares are common stock or
preferred stock) not entitled to be voted due to the restrictions set
forth in Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the ISE Holdings COI
(and not waived by the ISE Holdings Board of Directors and approved by
the Commission pursuant to Section III(b)(i) of Article FOURTH of the
ISE Holdings COI), shall not be deemed to be outstanding for purposes
of determining a quorum or a minimum vote required for the transaction
of any business at any meeting of stockholders of ISE Holdings,
including, without limitation, when specified business is to be voted
on by a class or a series voting as a class.
As a result of the addition of new Article FOURTH, Section
III(b)(iii) of the ISE Holdings COI, the Exchange proposes to renumber
current Article FOURTH, Section III(b)(iii) as resulting Article
FOURTH, Section III(b)(iv).
The Exchange proposes several changes to Article FOURTH,
Section III(c) of the ISE Holdings COI, which relates to violations of
any Ownership Limits or Voting Limits and the treatment of Excess
Shares, including the following:
Addition of new text relating to the designation as
``Excess Shares'' for any shares held in excess of the relevant
Ownership Limits; such designation and treatment being effective as of
the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the
purported transfer or other event leading to such Excess Shares.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See resulting Article FOURTH, Section III(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deletion of current text requiring notification to the ISE
Trust upon the occurrence of certain events and the transfer of Voting
Shares to the ISE Trust.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing the treatment of ``Excess
Shares'' upon any sale, transfer, assignment or pledge that, if
effective would result in any Person, either alone or together with its
Related Persons, owning shares in excess of any of the Ownership
Limits. Specifically, the Exchange proposes within new Article FOURTH,
Section III(c)(i) of the ISE Holdings COI that any such purported event
shall be void ab initio as to such Excess Shares, and the intended
transferee shall acquire no rights in such Excess Shares. Such Excess
Shares shall be deemed to have been transferred to ISE Holdings (or to
an entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is unaffiliated with ISE
Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons owning such Excess
Shares), as Special Trustee of the Charitable Trust for the exclusive
benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary or Beneficiaries.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(ii). The
``Charitable Beneficiary'' would be one or more organizations
described in Sections 170(b)(1)(A) or 170(c) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. The ``Charitable Trust''
would be the trust established for the benefit of the Charitable
Beneficiary for which ISE Holdings is the trustee. The ``Special
Trustee'' would be ISE Holdings, in its capacity as trustee for the
Charitable Trust, any entity appointed by ISE Holdings that is
unaffiliated with ISE Holdings and any Person or its Related Persons
owning Excess Shares, and any successor trustee appointed by ISE
Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing the treatment of dividends
or other distributions paid with respect to Excess Shares.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing the handling of any
distribution of assets received in respect of the Excess Shares in any
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or any distribution of the
assets of ISE Holdings.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing the authority of the
Special Trustee with respect to rescinding as void any votes cast by a
purported transferee or holder of Excess Shares as well as recasting of
votes in accordance with the desires of the Special Trustee acting for
the benefit of ISE Holdings.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing the sale by the Special
Trustee, to a Person or Persons designated by the Special Trustee whose
ownership of Voting Shares will not violate any Ownership Limit or
Voting Limit, of Excess Shares transferred to the Charitable Trust,
within 20 days of receiving notice from ISE Holdings that Excess Shares
have been so transferred.\49\ Existing text would be deleted that
requires the Trustees of the ISE Trust to use their commercially
reasonable efforts to sell the Excess Shares upon receipt of written
instructions from the ISE Trust Beneficiary. New text also would be
added describing the handling of any proceeds of such a sale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addition of new text describing that Excess Shares shall
be deemed to have been offered for sale to ISE Holdings on
[[Page 30356]]
the date of the transaction or event resulting in such Excess
Shares.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See proposed Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(vii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deletion of current Article FOURTH, Section III(c)(v),
which currently relates to the ISE Trust Beneficiary's right to
reacquire Excess Shares from the ISE Trust under certain circumstances.
The Exchange is not proposing to reinstate all of the ISE Holdings
COI text that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE
Holdings, as certain of such text would continue to not be applicable,
even after the Transaction, given the Exchange's resulting ownership.
For example, prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings,
the ISE Holdings COI contained certain provisions that dealt with the
publicly-traded nature of ISE Holdings' stock. This text was removed
from the ISE Holdings COI upon Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE
Holdings, as ISE Holdings' stock ceased to be publicly-traded.\51\
Therefore, the Exchange is not proposing to reinstate the following
provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that existed prior to Deutsche
B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE Holdings relating to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ See Exhibit 5A to SR-ISE-2007-101, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 14A under the Act (pertaining to solicitations
of proxies).
the treatment of transactions of ISE Holdings stock on or
through the facilities of any national securities exchange or national
securities association.
inspection of the ISE Holdings accounts and records by ISE
Holdings stockholders.
stockholder voting to amend, repeal or adopt provisions of
the ISE Holdings COI or the ISE Holdings Bylaws.
stockholder action called at annual or special meetings of
stockholders.
nominations for directors and the election thereof.
The Exchange also is not proposing to reinstate the ISE Holdings
COI text that existed prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE
Holdings that related to changes in terminology used throughout the ISE
Holdings COI.\52\ Additionally, provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that
authorize shares of capital stock of ISE Holdings have been amended
since Deutsche B[ouml]rse acquired ownership of ISE Holdings.\53\ The
Exchange does not propose to amend the text of the ISE Holdings COI
relating to share authorization. The Exchange also does not propose to
reinstate the location or specific wording of text of the ISE Holdings
COI that was adjusted or relocated upon Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership
of ISE Holdings, but that otherwise has the same practical effect and
meaning as it did prior to Deutsche B[ouml]rse's ownership of ISE
Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ For example, the ISE Holdings COI currently refers to
Delaware General Corporation Law as ``DGCL.'' The Exchange would not
reinstate the prior ``GCL'' term that was used in the ISE Holdings
COI.
\53\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No 73860
(December 17, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 23, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-
44).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. U.S. Exchange Holdings COI
The Exchange proposes to remove the reference to the Trust
Agreement in Article THIRTEENTH of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI. As
proposed herein, the Trust Agreement will cease to be considered rules
of the Exchange as of the Closing of the Transaction and would be
repealed in connection with the Transaction. The Exchange also proposes
to retitle the document as the ``Fourth'' Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Exchange Holdings and update the
effective date thereof.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ The proposed, amended U.S. Exchange Holdings COI is
attached hereto as Exhibit 5F. Article SIXTEENTH of the U.S.
Exchange Holdings COI provides that, for so long as U.S. Exchange
Holdings shall control, directly or indirectly, the Exchange, or
facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision
of the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI shall be effective, the same shall
be submitted to the board of directors of the Exchange, and if the
same must be filed with, or filed with and approved by, the
Commission before the same may be effective, under Section 19 of the
Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, then the same shall not be
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the
Commission, as the case may be. The Exchange also proposes to amend
the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI to consistently refer to such
document as the ``Restated Certificate,'' which is a defined term
therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. ISE Holdings Bylaws
The ISE Holdings COI Voting Limits restrict any person, either
alone or together with its related persons, from having voting control,
either directly or indirectly, over more than 20% of the outstanding
capital stock of ISE Holdings. The ISE Holdings COI Ownership Limits
restrict any person, either alone or together with its related persons,
from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than
40% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings (or in the case of
any Exchange member, acting alone or together with its related persons,
from directly or indirectly owning of record or beneficially more than
20% of the outstanding capital stock of ISE Holdings).\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, Section III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ISE Holdings COI and the ISE Holdings Bylaws provide that the
board of directors of ISE Holdings may waive these voting and ownership
restrictions in an amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws if the board
makes the following three findings: (1) The waiver will not impair the
ability of the Exchange to carry out its functions and responsibilities
as an exchange under the Act and the rules thereunder; (2) the waiver
is otherwise in the best interests of ISE Holdings, its stockholders,
and the Exchange; and (3) the waiver will not impair the ability of the
Commission to enforce the Act. However, the board of directors may not
waive these voting and ownership restrictions as they apply to Exchange
members. In addition, the board of directors may not waive these voting
and ownership restrictions if such waiver would result in a person
subject to a ``statutory disqualification'' owning or voting shares
above the stated thresholds. Any waiver of these voting and ownership
restrictions must be by way of an amendment to the Bylaws approved by
the board of directors, which amendment must be approved by the
Commission.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ See ISE Holdings COI, Article FOURTH, Sections III(a)(i)
and III(b)(i). Such amendment to Holdings Bylaws must be filed with
and approved by the Commission under Section 19(b) of the Act and
become effective thereunder. In this regard, Section 10.1 of the
Bylaws provides that the Bylaws may be amended, added to, rescinded
or repealed at any meeting of the Board of Directors of ISE Holdings
or meeting of the stockholders. With respect to each national
securities exchange controlled, directly or indirectly, by ISE
Holdings (the ``Controlled National Securities Exchanges''), or
facility thereof, before any amendment to or repeal of any provision
of the Bylaws of ISE Holdings shall be effective, the same shall be
submitted to the board of directors of each Controlled National
Securities Exchange, and if the same must be filed with, or filed
with and approved by, the Commission before the same may be
effective, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules promulgated
thereunder, then the same shall not be effective until filed with,
or filed with and approved by, the Commission, as the case may be.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acting pursuant to this waiver provision, the board of directors of
ISE Holdings has approved the amendment to the ISE Holdings Bylaws to
waive the Ownership Limits and Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq
to indirectly own 100% of the outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings
as of and after Closing of the Transaction.\57\ In adopting such
amendment, the board of directors of ISE Holdings made the necessary
determinations and approved
[[Page 30357]]
the submission of the Proposed Rule Change to the Commission. In so
waiving the applicable voting and ownership restrictions, the board of
directors of ISE Holdings has determined, with respect to Nasdaq, that:
(i) Such waiver will not impair the ability of ISE Holdings and each
Controlled National Securities Exchange, or facility thereof, to carry
out its respective functions and responsibilities under the Act and the
rules promulgated thereunder; \58\ (ii) such waiver is otherwise in the
best interests of ISE Holdings, its stockholders, and each Controlled
National Securities Exchange, or facility thereof; \59\ (iii) such
waiver will not impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the
Act; \60\ (iv) neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons (as that
term is defined in the ISE Holdings COI) are subject to any applicable
``statutory disqualification'' (within the meaning of Section 3(a)(39)
of the Act); and (v) neither Nasdaq nor any of its Related Persons is a
member (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Act) of
such Controlled National Securities Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ The proposed, amended ISE Holdings Bylaws are attached
hereto as Exhibit 5G. The proposed amendment to the ISE Holdings
Bylaws would also clarify that Eurex Global Derivatives AG or
``EGD,'' which is referenced in Section 11.2 of the ISE Holdings
Bylaws, ceased to be an Upstream Owner of the Exchange as a result
of a prior transaction that did not require an amendment to the ISE
Holdings Bylaws. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73530
(November 5, 2014), 79 FR 77066 (December 17, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-
44).
\58\ For example, the Exchange will continue to conduct its
regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market
and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any
changes to its regulated activities in connection with the
Transaction. The Exchange is not proposing any amendments to its
trading or regulatory rules at this time relating to the
Transaction.
\59\ For example, the Transaction will produce a stronger and
more efficient infrastructure that will have an improved ability to
provide innovative products and services.
\60\ For example, the Commission will continue to have plenary
regulatory authority over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as
well as jurisdiction over the Exchange's direct and indirect owners
with respect to activities related to the Exchange. The Commission
will continue to have appropriate oversight tools to ensure that the
Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act with respect to
the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their directors
(where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the extent
they are involved in the activities of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the
manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. In addition,
the Transaction will not impair the ability of the Exchange's, or any
facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and
responsibilities under the Act and will not impair the ability of the
Commission to enforce the Act. The Exchange therefore seeks approval of
the waiver described herein with respect to the Ownership Limits and
Voting Limits in order to permit Nasdaq to indirectly own 100% of the
outstanding common stock of ISE Holdings as of and after Closing of the
Transaction.
Summary
The Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated activities
(including operating and regulating its market and Members) in the
manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. The
Transaction will not impair the ability of ISE Holdings, the Exchange,
or any facility thereof, to carry out their respective functions and
responsibilities under the Act. Moreover, the Transaction will not
impair the ability of the Commission to enforce the Act with respect to
the Exchange. As such, the Commission's plenary regulatory authority
over the Exchange will not be affected by the approval of this Proposed
Rule Change. The Exchange is requesting approval by the Commission of
changes proposed herein in order to allow the Transaction to take
place.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)of the Act,\61\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(1) of the Act,\62\ in particular, in that it enables the Exchange
to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its
exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with
the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and
the rules of the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is designed to
enable the Exchange to continue to have the authority and ability to
effectively fulfill its self-regulatory duties pursuant to the Act and
the rules promulgated thereunder. The Exchange will continue to conduct
its regulated activities (including operating and regulating its market
and Members) in the manner currently conducted and will not make any
changes to its regulated activities in connection with the Transaction.
Thus, the Commission will continue to have plenary regulatory authority
over the Exchange, as is currently the case, as well as jurisdiction
over the Exchange's direct and indirect owners with respect to
activities related to the Exchange. The Proposed Rule Change is
consistent with and will facilitate an ownership structure that will
continue to provide the Commission with appropriate oversight tools to
ensure that the Commission will have the ability to enforce the Act
with respect to the Exchange, its direct and indirect owners and their
directors (where applicable), officers, employees and agents to the
extent they are involved in the activities of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
\62\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that this Proposed Rule Change furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \63\ of the Act because the Proposed
Rule Change would be consistent with and facilitate a governance and
regulatory structure that is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the Proposed Rule Change will continue to provide the
Commission and the Exchange with access to necessary information that
will allow the Exchange to efficiently and effectively enforce
compliance with the Act, as well as allow the Commission to provide
proper oversight, which will ultimately promote just and equitable
principles of trade and protect investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval of this Proposed Rule Change will enable ISE Holdings to
continue its operations and the Exchange to continue its orderly
discharge of regulatory duties to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
In addition, the Exchange expects that the Transaction will
facilitate efficiencies and innovation for clients and efficient,
transparent and well-regulated markets for issuers and clients, thus
removing impediments to, and perfecting the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system. The Transaction will benefit
investors, the market as a whole, and shareholders by, among other
things, enhancing competition among securities venues and reducing
costs. In particular,
[[Page 30358]]
the Transaction will contribute to streamlined and efficient
operations, thereby intensifying competition for transaction order flow
with other exchange and non-exchange trading centers, as well as
potentially in other areas, such as proprietary market data products
and listings. This enhanced level of competition among trading centers
will benefit investors through new or more competitive product
offerings and, ultimately, lower costs.
Furthermore, the Exchange will continue to conduct its regulated
activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members)
in the manner currently conducted and will not make any changes to its
regulated activities in connection with the Transaction. Therefore, the
Exchange believes that it will continue to satisfy the requirements of
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to
a national securities exchange.
The Exchange believes it is consistent with the Act to allow Nasdaq
to become the ultimate parent of the Exchange. Neither Nasdaq nor any
of its related persons is subject to any statutory disqualification or
is a Member of the Exchange. Moreover, the Nasdaq governing documents
include certain provisions designed to maintain the independence of the
Exchange's self-regulatory functions. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that Nasdaq's acquisition of ultimate ownership and exercise
of voting control of the Exchange will not impair the ability of the
Commission or the Exchange to discharge their respective
responsibilities under the Act.
Although Nasdaq will not carry out regulatory functions, its
activities with respect to the operation of the Exchange must be
consistent with, and not interfere with, the Exchange's self-regulatory
obligations. Nasdaq's governing documents include certain provisions
that are designed to maintain the independence of the Exchange's self-
regulatory functions, enable the Exchange to operate in a manner that
complies with the U.S. federal securities laws, including the
objectives and requirements of Sections 6(b) and 19(g) of the Act,\64\
and facilitate the ability of the Exchange and the Commission to
fulfill their regulatory and oversight obligations under the Act. For
example, the Nasdaq governing documents provide that Nasdaq will comply
with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations
thereunder and shall cooperate with the Commission and the Exchange.
Also, each board member, officer, and employee of Nasdaq, in
discharging his or her responsibilities, shall comply with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder,
cooperate with the Commission, and cooperate with the Exchange. In
discharging his or her responsibilities as a board member of Nasdaq,
each such member must, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable
law, take into consideration the effect that Nasdaq's actions would
have on the ability of the Exchange to carry out its responsibilities
under the Act. In addition, Nasdaq, its board members, officers and
employees shall give due regard to the preservation of the independence
of the self-regulatory function of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, Nasdaq (along with its respective board members, officers,
and employees) and U.S. Exchange Holdings agree to keep confidential,
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, all confidential
information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of the Exchange,
including, but not limited to, confidential information regarding
disciplinary matters, trading data, trading practices, and audit
information, contained in the books and records of the Exchange and not
use such information for any non-regulatory purposes.
In addition, Nasdaq's books and records relating to the activities
of the Exchange will at all times be made available for, and books and
records of U.S. Exchange Holdings will be subject at all times to,
inspection and copying by the Commission and the Exchange. Books and
records of U.S. Exchange Holdings related to the activities of the
Exchange also will continue to be maintained within the U.S. Moreover,
for so long as Nasdaq directly or indirectly controls the Exchange, the
books, records, officers, directors (or equivalent), and employees of
Nasdaq shall be deemed to be the books, records, officers, directors,
and employees of the Exchange.
To the extent involved in the activities of the Exchange, Nasdaq,
its board members, officers, and employees irrevocably submit to the
jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the Commission for purposes
of any action arising out of, or relating to, the activities of the
Exchange. Likewise, U.S. Exchange Holdings, its officers and directors,
and employees whose principal place of business and residence is
outside of the U.S., to the extent such directors, officers, or
employees are involved in the activities of the Exchange, irrevocably
submit to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts and the
Commission for purposes of any action arising out of, or relating to,
the activities of the Exchange.
The Nasdaq governing documents, the U.S. Exchange Holdings COI, and
the U.S. Exchange Holdings Bylaws require that any change thereto must
be submitted to the Exchange's Board. If such change must be filed
with, or filed with and approved by, the Commission under Section 19 of
the Act and the rules thereunder, then such change shall not be
effective until filed with, or filed with and approved by, the
Commission. This requirement to submit changes to the Exchange's Board
continues for so long as Nasdaq or U.S. Exchange Holdings, as
applicable, directly or indirectly, control the Exchange.
As Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will both cease to be
Non-U.S. Upstream Owners of the Exchange upon the Closing of the
Transaction, the Exchange believes that its proposal that the
resolutions of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and Eurex Frankfurt will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the
Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act.
The purpose for which the ISE Trust was formed will not be relevant
after the Closing of the Transaction, given that the Exchange will no
longer have Non-U.S. Upstream Owners and that the Exchange's current
and resulting U.S. upstream owners' governing documents provide for
similar protections (e.g., U.S. Exchange Holdings COI Article
THIRTEENTH and Nasdaq Bylaws Section 12.5). Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that its proposal that the Trust Agreement will cease to be
considered rules of the Exchange as of a date that corresponds to the
Closing date of the Transaction is consistent with the Act.
Given the Exchange's proposal to repeal the Trust Agreement and
dissolve the ISE Trust, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
to the ISE Holdings COI are consistent with the Act. The proposed
changes would delete provisions of the ISE Holdings COI that will no
longer be relevant and would reinstate certain provisions of the ISE
Holdings COI that were removed upon introduction of the provisions
relating to the ISE Trust and the Trust Agreement.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\65\ the Exchange
believes that the Proposed Rule Change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
[[Page 30359]]
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Indeed, the Exchange believes
that the Proposed Rule Change will enhance competition among
intermarket trading venues, as the Exchange believes that the
Transaction will produce a stronger and more efficient infrastructure
that will have an improved ability to provide innovative products and
services. Moreover, the Exchange will continue to conduct regulated
activities (including operating and regulating its market and Members)
of the type it currently conducts, but will be able to do so in a more
efficient manner to the benefit of its Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's conclusion that the Proposed Rule Change would not
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act is consistent
with the Commission's prior conclusions about similar combinations
involving multiple exchanges in a single corporate family.\66\ In this
regard, the Exchange notes that the Exchange, and its affiliates ISE
Gemini and ISE Mercury, function only as options trading markets--they
do not function as equity trading markets or as clearing agencies, as
do certain of Nasdaq's existing subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66071 (Dec.
29, 2011), 77 FR 521 (Jan. 05, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2011-107 and SR-NSX-
2011-14); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324 (Aug. 7, 2008),
73 FR 46936 (Aug. 12, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-2008-23; SR-BSE-
2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53382 (Feb. 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (Mar. 06, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-
77); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71449 (Jan. 30, 2014), 79
FR 6961 (Feb. 05, 2014) (SR-EDGA-2013-34; SR-EDGX-2013-43);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR
3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR-EDGA-2011-34; SR-EDGX-2011-33;
SR-ISE-2011-69; SR-NYSE-2011-51; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-78; SR-NYSEArca-
2011-72).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that there is considerable support for a
finding that the Transaction is consistent with the Act with respect to
competition. 14 exchanges currently compete for options trading
business. Exchanges compete on technology, market model, trading venue,
fees and fee structure. Additionally, low switching costs allow
customers to easily move to another exchange, which customers do
regularly, as reflected in constantly varying market shares among the
existing exchange operators. In addition, the Commission has approved
several, new registered options exchanges in recent history, which
highlights an increase in competition in the market for listed options
trading.\67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\67\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76998
(January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066 (February 4, 2016) (Order approving
application for exchange registration of ISE Mercury, LLC); 75650
(August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015) (Order approving
rules governing the trading of options on the EDGX Options Market);
70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (August 1, 2013) (Order approving
application for exchange registration of Topaz Exchange, LLC (n/k/a
ISE Gemini, LLC)); 68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065 (December
7, 2012) (Order approving application for exchange registration of
Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC); 61419 (January 26,
2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (Order approving rules
governing the trading of options on the BATS Options Exchange).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the Transaction will not change the
competitive landscape for listed options trading and the changes
proposed herein are consistent with other recent Commission approvals.
For example, a similar proposed combination of Deutsche B[ouml]rse and
NYSE Euronext in 2011 received Commission approval and would have
resulted in a combined greater than 40% market share of listed options
volume among its three, respective options exchanges (based on 2010
data).\68\ Similarly, as a result of the Transaction, the options
exchanges owned by Nasdaq would account for approximately 41% aggregate
market share of listed options volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66171 (January 17,
2012), 77 FR 3297 (January 23, 2012) (File Nos. SR-EDGA-2011-34; SR-
EDGX-2011-33; SR-ISE-2011-69; SR-NYSE-2011-51; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-78;
SR-NYSEArca-2011-72).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the publication date of this notice or within
such longer period (1) as the Commission may designate up to 45 days of
such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or (2) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such Proposed Rule Change; or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the Proposed Rule
Change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2016-11 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2016-11. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying
at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2016-11, and should be submitted on
or June 6, 2016.
[[Page 30360]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-11405 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P