Application for New Awards; Charter Schools Program (CSP)--Grants for Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools, 28837-28847 [2016-10925]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
France—Guided Multiple Launch
Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Rocket
Pods and Related Support
The Government of France has
requested a possible sale of twenty-one
(21) GMLRS Unitary Rocket Pods. Also
included are a GMLRS Quality
Assurance Team (QAT), GMLRS
publications, live fire data, software
updates, and technical assistance. The
total estimated value of MDE is $60
million. The overall total estimated
value is $90 million.
This proposed sale will enhance the
foreign policy and national security
objectives of the United States by
helping to improve the security of a
NATO ally which has been, and
continues to be an important force for
political stability and economic
progress. It is vital to the U.S. national
interest to assist France to develop and
maintain a strong and ready self-defense
capability.
France intends to use these missiles to
expand its existing army architecture
and improve its self-defense
capabilities. France is a co-developer of
the GMLRS and has operational
requirements for additional missiles.
France will have no difficulty absorbing
this equipment into its armed forces.
The proposed sale of this equipment
and support will not alter the basic
military balance in the region.
The U.S. Army procured the GMLRS
Unitary from Lockheed Martin
Industries, Camden, Arkansas. The sale
of these GMLRS Unitary will be from
U.S. stock; therefore, Lockheed Martin
will not be involved. There are no
known offset agreements proposed in
connection with this potential sale.
Implementation of this proposed sale
will require U.S. Government and
contractor representatives to travel to
France for equipment de-processing,
fielding, system checkout, and new
equipment training.
There will be no adverse impact on
U.S. defense readiness as a result of this
proposed sale.
Transmittal No. 16–22
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act, as amended
Annex
Item No. vii
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
1. The Guided Multiple Launch
Rocket System (GMLRS) M31 Unitary is
the Army’s primary munition for units
fielding the High Mobility Artillery
Rocket Systems (HIMARS) and Multiple
Launcher Rocket Systems (MLRS)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
M270A1 Rocket and Missile Launcher
platforms. The M31 Unitary is a solid
propellant artillery rocket that uses
Global Positioning System (GPS)-aided
inertial guidance to accurately and
quickly deliver a single high-explosive
blast fragmentation warhead on to point
targets at ranges from 15 to 70
kilometers. The rockets are fired from a
launch pod container that also serves as
the storage and transportation container
for the rockets. Each rocket pod holds
six (6) total rockets.
2. The GMLRS Unitary employs a
multi-mode fuze consisting of an
Electronic Safe and Arm Fuze (ESAF)
and a Frequency-Modulating
Continuous Wave-Directional Doppler
Ranging (FMCW–DDR) height-of-burst
sensor. The weapon has three fuzing
modes—point detonating, post-impact
time delay, and proximity height of
burst—which are all accomplished
automatically via a launcher/fire control
system electrical interface prior to
launch. The height-of-burst sensor is not
integrated with the fuze, but provides
fire pulse input and interfaces with a
mechanical fuze.
3. The Army’s FMCW–DDR height-ofburst technology comprises components
and software requiring special
production skills and is deemed state of
the art. The sensitive aspects of the
technology reside primarily in the
design, development, production, and
manufacturing data for the related
components (integrated circuits and flex
cable assembly) and in the methodology
required to integrate those components
onto the flex cable assembly to process
embedded data (the software, algorithm,
and operating parameters). The sole
technology aspect of the FMCW–DDR
present in the M31 proximity height-ofburst sensor is the signal processing
algorithm (i.e. processing techniques)
modified specifically for use in the M31.
The disclosure of know-how, software,
and other associated documentation for
this sensitive technology is not
authorized under this sale.
4. A determination has been made
that Government of France can provide
the same degree of protection for the
sensitive technology being released as
the U.S. Government. This sale is
necessary in furtherance of the U.S.
foreign policy and national security
objectives outlined in the Policy
Justification.
5. All defense articles and services
listed in this transmittal have been
authorized for release and export to the
Government of France.
[FR Doc. 2016–10890 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28837
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Application for New Awards; Charter
Schools Program (CSP)–-Grants for
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information: CSP—
Grants for Replication and Expansion of
High-Quality Charter Schools Notice
inviting applications for new awards for
fiscal year (FY) 2016.
SUMMARY:
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.282M.
Applications Available: May 10,
2016.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: June
16, 2016, 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC, time.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 20, 2016.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 23, 2016.
DATES:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the CSP is to increase national
understanding of the charter school
model by expanding the number of
high-quality charter schools (as defined
in this notice) available to students
across the Nation; providing financial
assistance for the planning, program
design, and initial implementation of
charter schools; and evaluating the
effects of charter schools, including
their effects on students, student
academic achievement, staff, and
parents.
The purpose of the CSP Grants for
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools (Replication
and Expansion) competition (CFDA
84.282M) is to award grants to eligible
applicants to enable them to replicate
(as defined in this notice) or expand
high-quality charter schools (as defined
in this notice) with demonstrated
records of success, including success in
increasing student academic
achievement. Eligible applicants may
use their grant funds to expand the
enrollment of one or more existing
charter schools by substantially
increasing the number of available seats
per school, or to open one or more new
charter schools that are based on the
charter school model for which the
eligible applicant has presented
evidence of success.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 10, 2015, the President signed
into law the Every Student Succeeds
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28838
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
Act (ESSA), Public Law 114–95, which
reauthorized the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965
(ESEA), as amended by the No Child
Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Under
section 5(c) of ESSA, CSP grants
awarded in FY 2016 and earlier years
will operate in accordance with the
requirements of the ESEA, as amended
by NCLB, and any continuation awards
applicable to these grants also will
operate in accordance with such
requirements.
For this year’s competition, the
Department uses the same absolute
priorities, competitive preference
priorities, and selection criteria as in FY
2015, because we believe these
facilitated a large number of highquality applications and a diverse pool
of applicants. In developing their
applications, applicants should review
the application package available at
www.Grants.gov for additional
information concerning the priorities,
application requirements, and selection
criteria of this notice, as well as more
detailed information on the submission
process.
Like the FY 2015 Replication and
Expansion grant competition, this notice
includes two absolute priorities for
applicants with Experience Operating or
Managing High-Quality Charter Schools,
and for applicants serving a LowIncome Demographic. The first absolute
priority requires applicants to operate or
manage more than one high-quality
charter school (as defined in this
notice), and the second requires
applicants to demonstrate that at least
60 percent of the students in the charter
schools it operates or manages are from
low-income families. Applicants should
review the application package for
additional information concerning the
absolute priorities. Both absolute
priorities are from the final priorities,
requirements, and selection criteria for
this program, published in the Federal
Register on July 12, 2011 (76 FR 40898)
(Final Priorities), and are intended to
ensure that projects are designed to
meet the needs of educationally
disadvantaged and other students.
The FY 2016 Replication and
Expansion grant competition also
includes the same three competitive
preference priorities as the FY 2015
Replication and Expansion competition.
Applicants addressing Competitive
Preference Priority 1 may select and
address only one of three parts of the
priority. Part (a) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1 is for projects
designed to support students who are
members of federally recognized Indian
tribes and is from the Secretary’s final
supplemental priorities and definitions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
for discretionary grant programs,
published in the Federal Register on
December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425)
(Supplemental Priorities). Part (b) of
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is for
projects designed to replicate (as
defined in this notice) and expand highquality charter schools in order to
support school improvement efforts by
local educational agencies (LEAs) and is
from the Final Priorities for this
program. Part (c) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1 is for projects
designed to replicate (as defined in this
notice) and expand high-quality charter
schools (as defined in this notice) in
federally designated Promise Zones, and
is from the notice of final priority for
Promise Zones, published in the
Federal Register on March 27, 2014 (79
FR 17035) (Promise Zones Priority). The
thirteen Promise Zones that have been
designated thus far are located in
Camden City, New Jersey; the Chocktaw
Nation of Oklahoma; East Indianapolis,
Indiana; Los Angeles, California; the
Lowlands of South Carolina;
Minneapolis, Minnesota; North
Hartford, Connecticut; Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Pine Ridge, South Dakota;
Sacramento, California; San Antonio,
Texas; Southeastern Kentucky; and St.
Louis, Missouri. Another Promise Zones
competition is currently underway and
new designees are expected to be
announced in the spring of 2016. If new
designees are announced prior to the
deadline for transmittal of applications
for this competition, applicants may
meet this priority by submitting the
requisite HUD form 50153, signed by an
authorized representative of the lead
organization of the newly designated
Promise Zone.
The second competitive preference
priority is Promoting Diversity. It is from
the Final Priorities for this program.
This priority awards additional points
to applications that demonstrate a
record of, and an intent to continue,
taking active measures to promote
diversity by bringing together students
of different backgrounds, such as
different racial, ethnic, and
socioeconomic backgrounds, and to
serve students with disabilities and
English learners at rates comparable to
the rates at which these students are
served in public schools in the
surrounding area. In connection with
developing responses to this priority,
applicants are encouraged to refer to the
joint guidance issued by the
Department’s Office for Civil Rights and
the U.S. Department of Justice entitled,
‘‘Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race
to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial
Isolation in Elementary and Secondary
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Schools’’ (www2.ed.gov/about/offices/
list/ocr/docs/guidance-ese-201111.pdf)
and ‘‘Schools’ Civil Rights Obligations
to English Learner Students and Limited
English Proficient Parents’’
(www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/
ellresources.html).
The third competitive preference
priority is Novice Applicants (as
defined in this notice). It is from 34 CFR
75.225(c)(2). This priority provides
additional points to applicants that have
neither received a CSP Replication and
Expansion grant—either individually or
as part of a group—at any point in the
past nor received a discretionary grant
from the Federal government in the
previous five years.
The FY 2016 Replication and
Expansion grant competition also
continues to include an invitational
priority that encourages applicants to
conduct rigorous evaluations of
practices within their schools that will,
if well implemented, produce evidence
that meets What Works Clearinghouse
(WWC) Evidence Standards (as defined
in this notice). The Department remains
committed to building evidence of the
effectiveness of a range of educational
practices, increasing the number of
schools that implement practices that
are based on evidence, and identifying
and evaluating practices that other
schools or school systems could adopt
to improve outcomes for their students
(e.g., educator induction practices or
school discipline policies).
Finally, the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016, Division H,
Pub. L. 114–113 (FY 2016
Appropriations Act), retains the
authority provided in Appropriations
Acts for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 to
use CSP funds ‘‘for grants that support
preschool education in charter schools.’’
For information on the use of CSP funds
to support preschool education in
charter schools, see ‘‘Guidance on the
Use of Funds to Support Preschool
Education’’ at www2.ed.gov/programs/
charter/csppreschoolfaqs.doc.
All charter schools receiving CSP
funds, as outlined in section 5210(1)(G)
of the ESEA, must comply with various
non-discrimination laws, including the
Age Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX
of the Education Amendments of 1972,
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, part B of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (specifies
rights afforded to students with
disabilities and their parents), and
applicable State laws.
Priorities: This notice includes two
absolute priorities, three competitive
preference priorities, and one
invitational priority. Both absolute
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
priorities are from the Final Priorities
for this program. Part (a) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1 is from the
Supplemental Priorities; part (b) is from
the Final Priorities; and part (c) is from
the Promise Zones Priority. Competitive
Preference Priority 2 is from the Final
Priorities, and Competitive Preference
Priority 3 is from 34 CFR 75.225(c)(2).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2016 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition,
these priorities are absolute priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider
only applications that meet both of the
following priorities:
Absolute Priority 1—Experience
Operating or Managing High-Quality
Charter Schools.
This priority is for projects that will
provide for the replication or expansion
of high-quality charter schools (as
defined in this notice) by applicants that
currently operate or manage more than
one high-quality charter school (as
defined in this notice).
Absolute Priority 2—Low-Income
Demographic.
To meet this priority, an applicant
must demonstrate that at least 60
percent of all students in the charter
schools it currently operates or manages
are individuals from low-income
families (as defined in this notice).
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2016 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards based on the list
of unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will award an
additional five points to an application
that addresses part (a) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1; an additional four
points to an application that addresses
part (b) of Competitive Preference
Priority 1; or an additional point to an
application that addresses part (c) of
Competitive Preference Priority 1. An
application may receive points for only
one of the three parts of Competitive
Preference Priority 1, and should
specify which part it is addressing. If an
applicant addresses more than one part
of Competitive Preference Priority 1 and
does not specify whether it is
addressing part (a), (b), or (c), the
application will be awarded priority
points only for the part addressed in the
application that has the highest
maximum potential point value,
regardless of the number of priority
points the application is awarded for
that particular part of Competitive
Preference Priority 1.
We will award an additional three
points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
an additional two points to an
application that meets Competitive
Preference Priority 3. The maximum
total competitive preference priority
points an application can receive for
this competition is 10.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1. (0,
1, 4, or 5 points).
(a) Supporting High Need Students. (0
or 5 points).
Projects that are designed to improve
academic outcomes, learning
environments, or both, for students who
are members of federally recognized
Indian tribes.
(b) School Improvement. (0 or 4
points).
To meet this priority, an applicant
must demonstrate that its proposed
replication or expansion of one or more
high-quality charter schools (as defined
in this notice) will occur in partnership
with, and will be designed to assist, one
or more LEAs in implementing
academic or structural interventions to
serve students attending schools that
have been identified for improvement,
corrective action, closure, or
restructuring under section 1116 of the
ESEA, and as described in the notice of
final requirements for School
Improvement Grants, published in the
Federal Register on October 28, 2010
(75 FR 66363).
Note: Applicants in States that are
exercising flexibility under the ESEA, as
amended by NCLB, in the 2015–16
school year may partner with LEAs to
serve students attending priority or
focus schools (see the Department’s June
7, 2012 guidance entitled, ‘‘ESEA
Flexibility,’’ at www.ed.gov/esea/
flexibility, and the Office of Elementary
and Secondary Education’s (OESE’s)
December 18, 2015 Dear Colleague
Letter at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/
elsec/leg/essa/transition-dcl.pdf).
Applicants in all States should review
OESE’s January 28, 2016 Dear Colleague
Letter at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/
elsec/leg/essa/transitionsy1617-dcl.pdf,
for information on interventions
required in 2016–2017.
(c) Promise Zones. (0 or 1 point).
This priority is for projects that are
designed to serve and coordinate with a
federally designated Promise Zone.
Note: As a participant in the
Administration’s Promise Zones
Initiative, the Department is cooperating
with the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD), the
Department of Agriculture (USDA), and
nine other Federal agencies to support
comprehensive revitalization efforts in
20 high-poverty urban, rural, and tribal
communities across the country. Each
application for Replication and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28839
Expansion grant funds that is
accompanied by a Certification of
Consistency with Promise Zone Goals
and Implementation (HUD Form 50153),
signed by an authorized representative
of the lead organization of a Promise
Zone designated by HUD or USDA
supporting the application, will meet
this priority. To view the list of
designated Promise Zones and lead
organizations please go to
www.hud.gov/promisezones. The
certification form is available at https://
portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/
huddoc?id=HUD_Form_50153.pdf.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
Promoting Diversity. (0 or 3 points).
This priority is for applicants that
demonstrate a record of (in the schools
they currently operate or manage), as
well as an intent to continue (in schools
that they will be creating or
substantially expanding (as defined in
this notice) under this grant), taking
active measures to —
(a) Promote student diversity,
including racial and ethnic diversity, or
avoid racial isolation;
(b) Serve students with disabilities at
a rate that is at least comparable to the
rate at which these students are served
in public schools in the surrounding
area; and
(c) Serve English learners at a rate that
is at least comparable to the rate at
which these students are served in
public schools in the surrounding area.
In support of this priority, applicants
must provide enrollment data as well as
descriptions of existing policies and
activities undertaken or planned to be
undertaken.
Note: An applicant addressing
Competitive Preference Priority 2 is
invited to discuss how the proposed
design of its project will encourage
approaches by charter schools that help
bring together students of different
backgrounds, including students from
different racial and ethnic backgrounds,
to attain the benefits that flow from a
diverse student body. The applicant
should discuss in its application how it
would ensure that those approaches are
permissible under current law.
Competitive Preference Priority 3—
Novice Applicant. (34 CFR 75.225(c)(2))
(0 or 2 points).
This priority is for applicants that
qualify as novice applicants (as defined
in this notice).
Invitational Priority: For FY 2016 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards based on the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an invitational priority.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), we do not
give an application that meets this
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28840
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
invitational priority any preference over
other applications.
This priority is:
Invitational Priority—Rigorous
Evaluation.
The Secretary is particularly
interested in funding applications that
demonstrate that the applicant is
currently conducting, or will conduct, a
rigorous independent evaluation of
specific practices within the applicant’s
charter schools (e.g., school discipline
policies or professional development
practices, such as teacher coaching),
through a quasi-experimental design
study or randomized controlled trial (as
defined in this notice) that will, if well
implemented, meet What Works
Clearinghouse (WWC) Evidence
Standards (as defined in this notice).
The following definitions are from 34
CFR 75.225 and 77.1 and the Final
Priorities for this program.
Ambitious means promoting
continued, meaningful improvement for
program participants or for other
individuals or entities affected by the
grant, or representing a significant
advancement in the field of education
research, practices, or methodologies.
When used to describe a performance
target (as defined in this notice),
whether a performance target (as
defined in this notice) is ambitious
depends upon the context of the
relevant performance measure (as
defined in this notice) and the baseline
(as defined in this notice) for that
measure. (34 CFR 77.1)
Baseline means the starting point
from which performance is measured
and targets are set. (34 CFR 77.1)
Charter management organization
(CMO) is a nonprofit organization that
operates or manages multiple charter
schools by centralizing or sharing
certain functions and resources among
schools. (Final Priorities)
Educationally disadvantaged students
includes, but is not necessarily limited
to, individuals from low-income
families (as defined in this notice),
English learners, migratory children,
children with disabilities, and neglected
or delinquent children. (Final Priorities)
High-quality charter school is a school
that shows evidence of strong academic
results for the past three years (or over
the life of the school, if the school has
been open for fewer than three years),
based on the following factors:
(1) Increasing student academic
achievement and attainment for all
students, including, as applicable,
educationally disadvantaged students
(as defined in this notice) served by the
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
(2) Either (i) Demonstrated success in
closing historic achievement gaps for
the subgroups of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA
at the charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant, or
(ii) No significant achievement gaps
between any of the subgroups of
students described in section
1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA at the
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant and significant gains in
student academic achievement with all
populations of students served by the
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant.
(3) Achieved results (including
performance on statewide tests, annual
student attendance and retention rates,
high school graduation rates, college
attendance rates, and college persistence
rates where applicable and available) for
low-income and other educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in
this notice) served by the charter
schools operated or managed by the
applicant that are above the average
academic achievement results for such
students in the State.
(4) No significant compliance issues
(as defined in this notice), particularly
in the areas of student safety and
financial management. (Final Priorities)
Individual from a low-income family
means an individual who is determined
by a State educational agency (SEA) or
LEA to be a child, age 5 through 17,
from a low-income family on the basis
of (a) data used by the Secretary to
determine allocations under section
1124 of the ESEA, (b) data on children
eligible for free or reduced-price
lunches under the Richard B. Russell
National School Lunch Act, (c) data on
children in families receiving assistance
under part A of title IV of the Social
Security Act, (d) data on children
eligible to receive medical assistance
under the Medicaid program under Title
XIX of the Social Security Act, or (e) an
alternate method that combines or
extrapolates from the data in items (a)
through (d) of this definition (see 20
U.S.C. 6537(3)). (Final Priorities)
Novice applicant means—
(a) Any applicant for a grant from the
Department that—
(i) Has never received a grant or
subgrant under the program from which
it seeks funding;
(ii) Has never been a member of a
group application, submitted in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.127–75.129,
that received a grant under the program
from which it seeks funding; and
(iii) Has not had an active
discretionary grant from the Federal
government in the five years before the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
deadline date for applications for new
awards under the program.
(b) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) of this section, a grant is active
until the end of the grant’s project or
funding period, including any
extensions of those periods that extend
the grantee’s authority to obligate funds
(34 CFR 75.225).
Performance measure means any
quantitative indicator, statistic, or
metric used to gauge program or project
performance. (34 CFR 77.1)
Performance target means a level of
performance that an applicant would
seek to meet during the course of a
project or as a result of a project. (34
CFR 77.1)
Quasi-experimental design study
means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an
experimental design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the
treatment group in important respects.
These studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations (but not What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without reservations). (34 CFR 77.1)
Randomized controlled trial means a
study that employs random assignment
of, for example, students, teachers,
classrooms, schools, or districts to
receive the intervention being evaluated
(the treatment group) or not to receive
the intervention (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the
intervention is the difference between
the average outcome for the treatment
group and for the control group. These
studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards (as
defined in this notice) without
reservations. (34 CFR 77.1)
Replicate means to open one or more
new charter schools that are based on
the charter school model or models for
which the applicant has presented
evidence of success. (Final Priorities)
Significant compliance issue means a
violation that did, will, or could lead to
the revocation of a school’s charter.
(Final Priorities)
Substantially expand means to
increase the student count of an existing
charter school by more than 50 percent
or to add at least two grades to an
existing charter school over the course
of the grant. (Final Priorities)
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards means the standards set forth
in the What Works Clearinghouse
Procedures and Standards Handbook
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be
found at the following link: //ies.ed.gov/
ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19.
(34 CFR 77.1)
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
Program Authority: FY 2016
Appropriations Act; and the ESEA, as
amended by NCLB (20 U.S.C. 7221–7221j).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84,
86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of
Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
Final Priorities for this program. (e) The
Promise Zones Priority. (f) The
Supplemental Priorities.
Note 1: The regulations in 34 CFR part
79 apply to all applicants except
federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note 2: The regulations in 34 CFR part
86 apply only to institutions of higher
education.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$65,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000
to $3,000,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$1,600,000 per year.
Estimated Number of Awards: 10–20.
Note: The Department is not bound by
any estimates in this notice. The
estimated range and average size of
awards are based on a single 12-month
budget period.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Maximum Award: See Reasonable
and Necessary Costs in section III.3.(a)
below for information regarding the
maximum amount of funds that may be
awarded per new school seat and per
new school.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Non-profit
charter management organizations (as
defined in this notice) and other entities
that are not for-profit entities. Eligible
applicants also may apply as a group or
consortium.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: (a) Reasonable and
Necessary Costs: The Secretary may
elect to impose maximum limits on the
amount of grant funds that may be
awarded per charter school replicated
(as defined in this notice), per charter
school substantially expanded (as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
defined in this notice), or per new
school seat created.
For this competition, the maximum
limit of grant funds that may be
awarded per new school seat is $3,000,
including a maximum limit per new
school created of $800,000. The
maximum limit per new school seat in
a charter school that is substantially
expanding (as defined in this notice) its
enrollment is $1,500, including a
maximum limit per substantially
expanded (as defined in this notice)
school of $800,000.
Note: Applicants must ensure that all
costs included in the proposed budget
are reasonable and necessary in light of
the goals and objectives of the proposed
project. Any costs determined by the
Secretary to be unreasonable or
unnecessary will be removed from the
final approved budget.
(b) Other CSP Grants: A charter
school that has received CSP funds for
replication or expansion previously, or
that has received funds for planning or
initial implementation of a charter
school (i.e., CFDA 84.282A or 84.282B),
may not use funds under this grant for
the same purpose. However, such
charter school may be eligible to receive
funds under this competition to
substantially expand the charter school
beyond the existing grade levels or
student count.
A charter school that receives funds
under this competition is ineligible to
receive funds for the same purpose
under section 5202(c)(2) of the ESEA,
including for planning and program
design or the initial implementation of
a charter school (i.e., CFDA 84.282A or
84.282B).
(c) Costs for Evaluation. In accordance
with 34 CFR 75.590, Replication and
Expansion grant funds may be used to
cover post-award costs associated with
an evaluation under the invitational
priority or an evaluation under
Selection Criterion (e) of this notice,
provided that such costs are reasonable
and necessary to meet the objectives of
the approved project.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package: Brian Martin, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW., Room 4W224, Washington, DC
20202–5970. Telephone: (202) 205–9085
or by email: brian.martin@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28841
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the program contact
person listed in this section.
2.a. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
Page Limit: The application narrative
(Part III of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the priorities,
selection criteria, and application
requirements that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We
recommend that you limit the
application narrative [Part III] to no
more than 60 pages, using the following
standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial. An application submitted
in any other font (including Times
Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be
accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part
I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, or the
letters of support. However, the page
limit does apply to all of the application
narrative section (Part III).
b. Submission of Proprietary
Information:
Given the types of projects that may
be proposed in applications for the
Replication and Expansion grant
competition, your application may
include business information that you
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we
define ‘‘business information’’ and
describe the process we use in
determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus,
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because we plan to make successful
applications available to the public, you
may wish to request confidentiality of
business information.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28842
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
feel is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: May 10, 2016.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: The
Department will hold a pre-application
meeting via Webinar for prospective
applicants on June 16, 2016, 2:00 p.m.
to 3:30 p.m., Washington, DC, time.
Individuals interested in attending this
meeting are encouraged to pre-register
by emailing their name, organization,
and contact information with the subject
heading ‘‘PRE-APPLICATION
MEETING’’ to CharterSchools@ed.gov.
There is no registration fee for attending
this meeting.
For further information about the preapplication meeting, contact Brian
Martin, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room
4W224, Washington, DC 20202–5970.
Telephone: (202) 205–9085 or by email:
brian.martin@ed.gov.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 24, 2016.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
Other Submission Requirements in
section IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 23, 2016.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grantees
under this program must use the grant
funds to replicate (as defined in this
notice) or substantially expand (as
defined in this notice) the charter school
model or models for which the
applicant has presented evidence of
success. Grant funds must be used to
carry out allowable activities, as
described in section 5204(f)(3) of the
ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7221c(f)(3)).
Pursuant to section 5204(f)(3) of the
ESEA, grantees under this program must
use the grant funds for—
(a) Post-award planning and design of
the educational program, which may
include: (i) Refinement of the desired
educational results and of the methods
for measuring progress toward achieving
those results; and (ii) professional
development of teachers and other staff
who will work in the charter school;
and
(b) Initial implementation of the
charter school, which may include: (i)
Informing the community about the
school; (ii) acquiring necessary
equipment and educational materials
and supplies; (iii) acquiring or
developing curriculum materials; and
(iv) other initial operational costs that
cannot be met from State or local
sources.
The FY 2016 Appropriations Act
authorizes the use of CSP funds ‘‘for
grants that support preschool education
in charter schools.’’ Therefore, an
application submitted under this
competition may propose to use CSP
funds to support preschool education in
a charter school. For additional
information and guidance regarding the
use of CSP funds to support preschool
education in charter schools, see
‘‘Guidance on the use of Funds to
support Preschool Education,’’ released
in November 2014 (www2.ed.gov/
programs/charter/
csppreschoolfaqs.doc).
In accordance with the program
requirements from the Final Priorities, a
grantee may use up to 20 percent of
grant funds for initial operational costs
associated with the expansion or
improvement of the grantee’s oversight
or management of its charter schools,
provided that: (i) The specific charter
schools being created or substantially
expanded (as defined in this notice)
under the grant are the intended
beneficiaries of such expansion or
improvement, and (ii) such expansion
or improvement is intended to improve
the grantee’s ability to manage or
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
oversee the charter schools created or
substantially expanded under the grant.
We reference additional regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the
Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award
Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the
Central Contractor Registry), the
Government’s primary registrant
database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information
while your application is under review
by the Department and, if you are
awarded a grant, during the project
period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet at the following
Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/
webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow two to five weeks for your
TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take
approximately seven business days, but
may take upwards of several weeks,
depending on the completeness and
accuracy of the data you enter into the
SAM database. Thus, if you think you
might want to apply for Federal
financial assistance under a program
administered by the Department, please
allow sufficient time to obtain and
register your DUNS number and TIN.
We strongly recommend that you
register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is
active, it may be 24 to 48 hours before
you can access the information in, and
submit an application through,
Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with
SAM, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your registration
annually. This may take three or more
business days.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
Information about SAM is available at
www.SAM.gov. To further assist you
with obtaining and registering your
DUNS number and TIN in SAM or
updating your existing SAM account,
we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet,
which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under the CSP
Grants for Replication and Expansion of
High-Quality Charter Schools, CFDA
number 84.282M, must be submitted
electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site,
you will be able to download a copy of
the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not email an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for CSP Grants for
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools at
www.Grants.gov. You must search for
the downloadable application package
for this competition by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA
number’s alpha suffix in your search
(e.g., search for 84.282, not 84.282M).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not accept your
application if it is received—that is, date
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system—after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News
and Events on the Department’s G5
system home page at www.G5.gov. In
addition, for specific guidance and
procedures for submitting an
application through Grants.gov, please
refer to the Grants.gov Web site at:
www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/
apply-for-grants.html.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: the Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28843
• You must upload any narrative
sections and all other attachments to
your application as files in a read-only,
non-modifiable Portable Document
Format (PDF). Do not upload an
interactive or fillable PDF file. If you
upload a file type other than a readonly, non-modifiable PDF (e.g., Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a
password-protected file, we will not
review that material. Please note that
this could result in your application not
being considered for funding because
the material in question—for example,
the project narrative—is critical to a
meaningful review of your proposal. For
that reason it is important to allow
yourself adequate time to upload all
material as PDF files. The Department
will not convert material from other
formats to PDF.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by
email if your application met all the
Grants.gov validation requirements or if
there were any errors (such as
submission of your application by
someone other than a registered
Authorized Organization
Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that
contains special characters). You will be
given an opportunity to correct any
errors and resubmit, but you must still
meet the deadline for submission of
applications.
Once your application is successfully
validated by Grants.gov, the Department
will retrieve your application from
Grants.gov and send you an email with
a unique PR/Award number for your
application.
These emails do not mean that your
application is without any disqualifying
errors. While your application may have
been successfully validated by
Grants.gov, it must also meet the
Department’s application requirements
as specified in this notice and in the
application instructions. Disqualifying
errors could include, for instance,
failure to upload attachments in a readonly, non-modifiable PDF; failure to
submit a required part of the
application; or failure to meet applicant
eligibility requirements. It is your
responsibility to ensure that your
submitted application has met all of the
Department’s requirements.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28844
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that the problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. We will
contact you after we determinate
whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we
refer in this section apply only to the
unavailability of, or technical problems
with, the Grants.gov system. We will not
grant you an extension if you failed to
fully register to submit your application
to Grants.gov before the application
deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system;
and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Brian Martin, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 4W224,
Washington, DC 20202–5970. FAX:
(202) 205–5630.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center,
Attention: CFDA Number 84.282M,
LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20202–
4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark.
Before relying on this method, you
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
should check with your local post
office.
We will not consider applications
postmarked after the application
deadline.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center,
Attention: CFDA Number 84.282M,
550 12th Street SW., Room 7039,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington,
DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand
deliver your application to the
Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the
Department—in Item 11 of the SF 424
the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under
which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail to you a notification of receipt
of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15
business days from the application
deadline date, you should call the U.S.
Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245–6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Application Requirements:
Applications for CSP Replication and
Expansion grant funds must address the
following application requirements. An
applicant may choose to respond to the
application requirements in the context
of its responses to the selection criteria.
These application requirements are
from the Final Priorities for this
program.
(a) Describe the objectives of the
project for replicating or substantially
expanding high-quality charter schools
(as defined in this notice) and the
methods by which the applicant will
determine its progress toward achieving
those objectives.
(b) Describe how the applicant
currently operates or manages the
charter schools for which it has
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
presented evidence of success, and how
the proposed new or substantially
expanded (as defined in this notice)
charter schools will be operated or
managed. Include a description of
central office functions, governance,
daily operations, financial management,
human resources management, and
instructional management. If applying
as a group or consortium, describe the
roles and responsibilities of each
member of the group or consortium and
how each member will contribute to this
project.
(c) Describe how the applicant will
ensure that each proposed new or
substantially expanded charter school
receives its commensurate share of
Federal education funds that are
allocated by formula each year,
including during the first year of
operation of the school and any year in
which the school’s enrollment
substantially expands (as defined in this
notice).
(d) Describe the educational program
to be implemented in the proposed new
or substantially expanded charter
schools, including how the program will
enable all students (including
educationally disadvantaged students
(as defined in this notice)) to meet State
student academic achievement
standards, the grade levels or ages of
students to be served, and the
curriculum and instructional practices
to be used.
Note: As part of the grants review
process, an applicant currently
operating or proposing to create or
substantially expand (as defined in this
notice) a single-sex charter school, or an
applicant currently providing or
proposing to provide a single-sex class
or single-sex extracurricular activity
within a coeducational charter school
(collectively referred to as ‘‘single-sex
educational program’’), must
demonstrate that its existing or
proposed single-sex educational
program is in compliance with
applicable nondiscrimination laws,
including the Equal Protection Clause of
the U.S. Constitution (as interpreted in
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515
(1996), and other cases) and Title IX of
the Education Amendments of 1972 (20
U.S.C. 1681, et seq.) and its regulations,
including 34 CFR 106.34. Such an
applicant likely will be required to
provide fact-specific information about
the single-sex educational program
within specified timeframes. In
addition, special conditions are likely to
be placed on any grant awarded to an
applicant that provides a single-sex
educational program. Please see the
application package for additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
information related to the requirements
for single-sex educational programs.
(e) Describe the administrative
relationship between the charter school
or schools to be replicated (as defined
in this notice) or substantially expanded
(as defined in this notice) by the
applicant and the authorized public
chartering agency.
(f) Describe how the applicant will
provide for continued operation of the
proposed new or substantially expanded
charter school or schools once the
Federal grant has expired.
(g) Describe how parents and other
members of the community will be
involved in the planning, program
design, and implementation of the
proposed new or substantially expanded
(as defined in this notice) charter school
or schools.
(h) Include a request and justification
for waivers of any Federal statutory or
regulatory provisions that the applicant
believes are necessary for the successful
operation of the proposed new or
substantially expanded charter schools.
(i) Describe how the grant funds will
be used, including how these funds will
be used in conjunction with other
Federal programs administered by the
Secretary, and with any matching funds.
(j) Describe how all students in the
community, including students with
disabilities, English learners, and other
educationally disadvantaged students
(as defined in this notice), will be
informed about the proposed new or
substantially expanded (as defined in
this notice) charter schools and given an
equal opportunity to attend such
schools.
Note: Under section 5210(1)(H) of the
ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7221i(1)(H)), charter schools
receiving CSP funds must admit students on
the basis of a lottery if more students apply
for admission than can be accommodated.
Accordingly, the application must include a
description of the applicant’s admissions
policy, including the lottery that will be
employed by each charter school that is
oversubscribed.
(k) Describe how the proposed new or
substantially expanded charter schools
that are considered to be LEAs under
State law, or the LEAs in which the new
or substantially expanded (as defined in
this notice) charter schools are located,
will comply with sections 613(a)(5) and
613(e)(1)(B) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
(l) Provide information on any
significant compliance issues (as
defined in this notice) identified within
the past three years for each school
managed by the applicant, including
compliance issues in the areas of
student safety, financial management,
and statutory or regulatory compliance.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28845
(m) For each charter school currently
operated or managed by the applicant,
provide the following information: The
year founded, the grades currently
served, the number of students, the
address, the percentage of students in
each subgroup of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA,
results on the State assessment for the
past three years (if available) by
subgroup, attendance rates, student
attrition rates for the past three years,
and (if the school operates a 12th grade)
high school graduation rates and college
attendance rates (maintaining standards
to protect personally identifiable
information).
(n) Provide objective data showing
applicant quality. In particular, the
Secretary requires the applicant to
provide the following data:
(1) Performance (school-wide and by
subgroup) for the past three years (if
available) on statewide tests of all
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant as compared to all
students in other schools in the State or
States at the same grade level, and as
compared with other schools serving
similar demographics of students
(maintaining standards to protect
personally identifiable information);
(2) Annual student attendance and
retention rates (school-wide and by
subgroup) for the past three years (or
over the life of the school, if the school
has been open for fewer than three
years), and comparisons with other
similar schools (maintaining standards
to protect personally identifiable
information); and
(3) Where applicable and available,
high school graduation rates, college
attendance rates, and college persistence
rates (school-wide and by subgroup) for
the past three years (if available) of
students attending schools operated or
managed by the applicant, and the
methodology used to calculate these
rates (maintaining standards to protect
personally identifiable information).
When reporting data for schools in
States that may have particularly
demanding or low standards of
proficiency, applicants are invited to
discuss how their academic success
might be considered against applicants
from across the country.
(o) Provide such other information
and assurances as the Secretary may
require.
2. Selection Criteria. The selection
criteria for this program are from the
Final Priorities for this program and 34
CFR 75.210. The maximum possible
score for addressing all of the criteria in
this section is 100 points. The
maximum possible score for addressing
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28846
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
each criterion is indicated in
parentheses following the criterion.
In evaluating an application, the
Secretary considers the following
criteria:
(a) Quality of the eligible applicant.
(Final Priorities) (50 points)
In determining the quality of the
applicant, the Secretary considers the
following factors—
(1) The degree, including the
consistency over the past three years, to
which the applicant has demonstrated
success in significantly increasing
student academic achievement and
attainment for all students, including, as
applicable, educationally disadvantaged
students (as defined in this notice)
served by the charter schools operated
or managed by the applicant (20 points).
(2) Either—
(i) The degree, including the
consistency over the past three years, to
which the applicant has demonstrated
success in closing historic achievement
gaps for the subgroups of students
described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II)
of the ESEA at the charter schools
operated or managed by the applicant,
or
(ii) The degree, including the
consistency over the past three years, to
which there have not been significant
achievement gaps between any of the
subgroups of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA
at the charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant and to which
significant gains in student academic
achievement have been made with all
populations of students served by the
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant (15 points).
(3) The degree, including the
consistency over the past three years, to
which the applicant has achieved
results (including performance on
statewide tests, annual student
attendance and retention rates, high
school graduation rates, college
attendance rates, and college persistence
rates where applicable and available) for
low-income and other educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in
this notice) served by the charter
schools operated or managed by the
applicant that are significantly above
the average academic achievement
results for such students in the State (15
points).
(b) Contribution in assisting
educationally disadvantaged students.
(Final Priorities) (10 points)
The contribution the proposed project
will make in assisting educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in
this notice) served by the applicant to
meet or exceed State academic content
standards and State student academic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
achievement standards, and to graduate
college- and career-ready. When
responding to this selection criterion,
applicants must discuss the proposed
locations of schools to be created or
substantially expanded and the student
populations to be served.
(c) Quality of the project design.
(Final Priorities) (10 points) The
Secretary considers the quality of the
design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified, measurable, and attainable.
Applicants proposing to open schools
serving substantially different
populations than those currently served
by the model for which they have
demonstrated evidence of success must
address the attainability of outcomes
given this difference.
(d) Quality of the management plan
and personnel. (Final Priorities) (20
points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan and personnel to
replicate and substantially expand highquality charter schools (as defined in
this notice). In determining the quality
of the management plan and personnel
for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers—
(1) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks (4 points).
(2) The business plan for improving,
sustaining, and ensuring the quality and
performance of charter schools created
or substantially expanded (as defined in
this notice) under these grants beyond
the initial period of Federal funding in
areas including, but not limited to,
facilities, financial management, central
office, student academic achievement,
governance, oversight, and human
resources of the charter schools (4
points).
(3) A multi-year financial and
operating model for the organization, a
demonstrated commitment of current
and future partners, and evidence of
broad support from stakeholders critical
to the project’s long-term success (4
points).
(4) The plan for closing charter
schools supported, overseen, or
managed by the applicant that do not
meet high standards of quality (2
points).
(5) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of the
project director, chief executive officer
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or organization leader, and key project
personnel, especially in managing
projects of the size and scope of the
proposed project (6 points).
(e) Quality of the evaluation plan. (34
CFR 75.210(h)(2)(iv)) (10 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the evaluation to be conducted of the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures (as
defined in this notice) that are clearly
related to the intended outcomes of the
project and will produce quantitative
and qualitative data to the extent
possible.
3. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
4. Risk Assessment and Special
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the
Secretary may impose special
conditions and, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
4. Performance Measures: (a) The goal
of the CSP is to support the creation and
development of a large number of highquality charter schools (as defined in
this notice) that are free from State or
local rules that inhibit flexible
operation, are held accountable for
enabling students to reach challenging
State performance standards, and are
open to all students. The Secretary has
two performance indicators to measure
progress towards this goal: (1) The
number of charter schools in operation
around the Nation, and (2) the
percentage of fourth- and eighth-grade
charter school students who are
achieving at or above the proficient
level on State assessments in
mathematics and reading/language arts.
Additionally, the Secretary has
established the following measure to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
examine the efficiency of the CSP:
Federal cost per student in
implementing a successful school
(defined as a school in operation for
three or more consecutive years).
(b) Project-Specific Performance
Measures. Applicants must propose
project-specific performance measures
(as defined in this notice) and
performance targets (as defined in this
notice) consistent with the objectives of
the proposed project. Applications must
provide the following information as
directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
(1) Performance measures. How each
proposed performance measure (as
defined in this notice) would accurately
measure the performance of the project
and how the proposed performance
measure (as defined in this notice)
would be consistent with the
performance measures (as defined in
this notice) established for the program
funding the competition.
(2) Baseline data. (i) Why each
proposed baseline (as defined in this
notice) is valid; or (ii) if the applicant
has determined that there are no
established baseline (as defined in this
notice) data for a particular performance
measure (as defined in this notice), an
explanation of why there is no
established baseline (as defined in this
notice) and of how and when, during
the project period, the applicant would
establish a valid baseline (as defined in
this notice) for the performance measure
(as defined in this notice).
(3) Performance targets. Why each
proposed performance target (as defined
in this notice) is ambitious (as defined
in this notice) yet achievable compared
to the baseline (as defined in this notice)
for the performance measure (as defined
in this notice) and when, during the
project period, the applicant would
meet the performance target(s) (as
defined in this notice).
(4) The applicant must also describe
in the application: (i) The data
collection and reporting methods the
applicant would use and why those
methods are likely to yield reliable,
valid, and meaningful performance data,
and (ii) the applicant’s capacity to
collect and report reliable, valid, and
meaningful performance data, as
evidenced by high-quality data
collection, analysis, and reporting in
other projects or research.
All grantees must submit an annual
performance report with information
that is responsive to these performance
measures (as defined in this notice).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28847
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets
(as defined in this notice) in the
grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Martin, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4W224, Washington, DC 20202–
5970. Telephone: (202) 205–9085 or by
email: brian.martin@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the
FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2016–10925 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28837-28847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10925]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Application for New Awards; Charter Schools Program (CSP)--Grants
for Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Overview Information: CSP--Grants for Replication and
Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools Notice inviting applications
for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2016.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.282M.
DATES: Applications Available: May 10, 2016.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: June 16, 2016, 2:00 p.m. to 3:30
p.m., Washington, DC, time.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 20, 2016.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 23, 2016.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the CSP is to increase national
understanding of the charter school model by expanding the number of
high-quality charter schools (as defined in this notice) available to
students across the Nation; providing financial assistance for the
planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter
schools; and evaluating the effects of charter schools, including their
effects on students, student academic achievement, staff, and parents.
The purpose of the CSP Grants for Replication and Expansion of
High-Quality Charter Schools (Replication and Expansion) competition
(CFDA 84.282M) is to award grants to eligible applicants to enable them
to replicate (as defined in this notice) or expand high-quality charter
schools (as defined in this notice) with demonstrated records of
success, including success in increasing student academic achievement.
Eligible applicants may use their grant funds to expand the enrollment
of one or more existing charter schools by substantially increasing the
number of available seats per school, or to open one or more new
charter schools that are based on the charter school model for which
the eligible applicant has presented evidence of success.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 10, 2015, the President signed
into law the Every Student Succeeds
[[Page 28838]]
Act (ESSA), Public Law 114-95, which reauthorized the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Under section 5(c) of ESSA, CSP grants
awarded in FY 2016 and earlier years will operate in accordance with
the requirements of the ESEA, as amended by NCLB, and any continuation
awards applicable to these grants also will operate in accordance with
such requirements.
For this year's competition, the Department uses the same absolute
priorities, competitive preference priorities, and selection criteria
as in FY 2015, because we believe these facilitated a large number of
high-quality applications and a diverse pool of applicants. In
developing their applications, applicants should review the application
package available at www.Grants.gov for additional information
concerning the priorities, application requirements, and selection
criteria of this notice, as well as more detailed information on the
submission process.
Like the FY 2015 Replication and Expansion grant competition, this
notice includes two absolute priorities for applicants with Experience
Operating or Managing High-Quality Charter Schools, and for applicants
serving a Low-Income Demographic. The first absolute priority requires
applicants to operate or manage more than one high-quality charter
school (as defined in this notice), and the second requires applicants
to demonstrate that at least 60 percent of the students in the charter
schools it operates or manages are from low-income families. Applicants
should review the application package for additional information
concerning the absolute priorities. Both absolute priorities are from
the final priorities, requirements, and selection criteria for this
program, published in the Federal Register on July 12, 2011 (76 FR
40898) (Final Priorities), and are intended to ensure that projects are
designed to meet the needs of educationally disadvantaged and other
students.
The FY 2016 Replication and Expansion grant competition also
includes the same three competitive preference priorities as the FY
2015 Replication and Expansion competition. Applicants addressing
Competitive Preference Priority 1 may select and address only one of
three parts of the priority. Part (a) of Competitive Preference
Priority 1 is for projects designed to support students who are members
of federally recognized Indian tribes and is from the Secretary's final
supplemental priorities and definitions for discretionary grant
programs, published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2014 (79 FR
73425) (Supplemental Priorities). Part (b) of Competitive Preference
Priority 1 is for projects designed to replicate (as defined in this
notice) and expand high-quality charter schools in order to support
school improvement efforts by local educational agencies (LEAs) and is
from the Final Priorities for this program. Part (c) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1 is for projects designed to replicate (as defined
in this notice) and expand high-quality charter schools (as defined in
this notice) in federally designated Promise Zones, and is from the
notice of final priority for Promise Zones, published in the Federal
Register on March 27, 2014 (79 FR 17035) (Promise Zones Priority). The
thirteen Promise Zones that have been designated thus far are located
in Camden City, New Jersey; the Chocktaw Nation of Oklahoma; East
Indianapolis, Indiana; Los Angeles, California; the Lowlands of South
Carolina; Minneapolis, Minnesota; North Hartford, Connecticut;
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Pine Ridge, South Dakota; Sacramento,
California; San Antonio, Texas; Southeastern Kentucky; and St. Louis,
Missouri. Another Promise Zones competition is currently underway and
new designees are expected to be announced in the spring of 2016. If
new designees are announced prior to the deadline for transmittal of
applications for this competition, applicants may meet this priority by
submitting the requisite HUD form 50153, signed by an authorized
representative of the lead organization of the newly designated Promise
Zone.
The second competitive preference priority is Promoting Diversity.
It is from the Final Priorities for this program. This priority awards
additional points to applications that demonstrate a record of, and an
intent to continue, taking active measures to promote diversity by
bringing together students of different backgrounds, such as different
racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds, and to serve students
with disabilities and English learners at rates comparable to the rates
at which these students are served in public schools in the surrounding
area. In connection with developing responses to this priority,
applicants are encouraged to refer to the joint guidance issued by the
Department's Office for Civil Rights and the U.S. Department of Justice
entitled, ``Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race to Achieve Diversity
and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools''
(www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/guidance-ese-201111.pdf) and
``Schools' Civil Rights Obligations to English Learner Students and
Limited English Proficient Parents'' (www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ellresources.html).
The third competitive preference priority is Novice Applicants (as
defined in this notice). It is from 34 CFR 75.225(c)(2). This priority
provides additional points to applicants that have neither received a
CSP Replication and Expansion grant--either individually or as part of
a group--at any point in the past nor received a discretionary grant
from the Federal government in the previous five years.
The FY 2016 Replication and Expansion grant competition also
continues to include an invitational priority that encourages
applicants to conduct rigorous evaluations of practices within their
schools that will, if well implemented, produce evidence that meets
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Evidence Standards (as defined in this
notice). The Department remains committed to building evidence of the
effectiveness of a range of educational practices, increasing the
number of schools that implement practices that are based on evidence,
and identifying and evaluating practices that other schools or school
systems could adopt to improve outcomes for their students (e.g.,
educator induction practices or school discipline policies).
Finally, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Division H,
Pub. L. 114-113 (FY 2016 Appropriations Act), retains the authority
provided in Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 to use
CSP funds ``for grants that support preschool education in charter
schools.'' For information on the use of CSP funds to support preschool
education in charter schools, see ``Guidance on the Use of Funds to
Support Preschool Education'' at www2.ed.gov/programs/charter/csppreschoolfaqs.doc.
All charter schools receiving CSP funds, as outlined in section
5210(1)(G) of the ESEA, must comply with various non-discrimination
laws, including the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, part B of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (specifies rights afforded
to students with disabilities and their parents), and applicable State
laws.
Priorities: This notice includes two absolute priorities, three
competitive preference priorities, and one invitational priority. Both
absolute
[[Page 28839]]
priorities are from the Final Priorities for this program. Part (a) of
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is from the Supplemental Priorities;
part (b) is from the Final Priorities; and part (c) is from the Promise
Zones Priority. Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Final
Priorities, and Competitive Preference Priority 3 is from 34 CFR
75.225(c)(2).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2016 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet both of the
following priorities:
Absolute Priority 1--Experience Operating or Managing High-Quality
Charter Schools.
This priority is for projects that will provide for the replication
or expansion of high-quality charter schools (as defined in this
notice) by applicants that currently operate or manage more than one
high-quality charter school (as defined in this notice).
Absolute Priority 2--Low-Income Demographic.
To meet this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that at least
60 percent of all students in the charter schools it currently operates
or manages are individuals from low-income families (as defined in this
notice).
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2016 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards based on the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will award an additional
five points to an application that addresses part (a) of Competitive
Preference Priority 1; an additional four points to an application that
addresses part (b) of Competitive Preference Priority 1; or an
additional point to an application that addresses part (c) of
Competitive Preference Priority 1. An application may receive points
for only one of the three parts of Competitive Preference Priority 1,
and should specify which part it is addressing. If an applicant
addresses more than one part of Competitive Preference Priority 1 and
does not specify whether it is addressing part (a), (b), or (c), the
application will be awarded priority points only for the part addressed
in the application that has the highest maximum potential point value,
regardless of the number of priority points the application is awarded
for that particular part of Competitive Preference Priority 1.
We will award an additional three points to an application that
meets Competitive Preference Priority 2, and an additional two points
to an application that meets Competitive Preference Priority 3. The
maximum total competitive preference priority points an application can
receive for this competition is 10.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1. (0, 1, 4, or 5 points).
(a) Supporting High Need Students. (0 or 5 points).
Projects that are designed to improve academic outcomes, learning
environments, or both, for students who are members of federally
recognized Indian tribes.
(b) School Improvement. (0 or 4 points).
To meet this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that its
proposed replication or expansion of one or more high-quality charter
schools (as defined in this notice) will occur in partnership with, and
will be designed to assist, one or more LEAs in implementing academic
or structural interventions to serve students attending schools that
have been identified for improvement, corrective action, closure, or
restructuring under section 1116 of the ESEA, and as described in the
notice of final requirements for School Improvement Grants, published
in the Federal Register on October 28, 2010 (75 FR 66363).
Note: Applicants in States that are exercising flexibility under
the ESEA, as amended by NCLB, in the 2015-16 school year may partner
with LEAs to serve students attending priority or focus schools (see
the Department's June 7, 2012 guidance entitled, ``ESEA Flexibility,''
at www.ed.gov/esea/flexibility, and the Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education's (OESE's) December 18, 2015 Dear Colleague Letter
at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/transition-dcl.pdf).
Applicants in all States should review OESE's January 28, 2016 Dear
Colleague Letter at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/transitionsy1617-dcl.pdf, for information on interventions required in
2016-2017.
(c) Promise Zones. (0 or 1 point).
This priority is for projects that are designed to serve and
coordinate with a federally designated Promise Zone.
Note: As a participant in the Administration's Promise Zones
Initiative, the Department is cooperating with the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Agriculture
(USDA), and nine other Federal agencies to support comprehensive
revitalization efforts in 20 high-poverty urban, rural, and tribal
communities across the country. Each application for Replication and
Expansion grant funds that is accompanied by a Certification of
Consistency with Promise Zone Goals and Implementation (HUD Form
50153), signed by an authorized representative of the lead organization
of a Promise Zone designated by HUD or USDA supporting the application,
will meet this priority. To view the list of designated Promise Zones
and lead organizations please go to www.hud.gov/promisezones. The
certification form is available at https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=HUD_Form_50153.pdf.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Promoting Diversity. (0 or 3
points).
This priority is for applicants that demonstrate a record of (in
the schools they currently operate or manage), as well as an intent to
continue (in schools that they will be creating or substantially
expanding (as defined in this notice) under this grant), taking active
measures to --
(a) Promote student diversity, including racial and ethnic
diversity, or avoid racial isolation;
(b) Serve students with disabilities at a rate that is at least
comparable to the rate at which these students are served in public
schools in the surrounding area; and
(c) Serve English learners at a rate that is at least comparable to
the rate at which these students are served in public schools in the
surrounding area.
In support of this priority, applicants must provide enrollment
data as well as descriptions of existing policies and activities
undertaken or planned to be undertaken.
Note: An applicant addressing Competitive Preference Priority 2 is
invited to discuss how the proposed design of its project will
encourage approaches by charter schools that help bring together
students of different backgrounds, including students from different
racial and ethnic backgrounds, to attain the benefits that flow from a
diverse student body. The applicant should discuss in its application
how it would ensure that those approaches are permissible under current
law.
Competitive Preference Priority 3--Novice Applicant. (34 CFR
75.225(c)(2)) (0 or 2 points).
This priority is for applicants that qualify as novice applicants
(as defined in this notice).
Invitational Priority: For FY 2016 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards based on the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(1), we do not give an application that meets this
[[Page 28840]]
invitational priority any preference over other applications.
This priority is:
Invitational Priority--Rigorous Evaluation.
The Secretary is particularly interested in funding applications
that demonstrate that the applicant is currently conducting, or will
conduct, a rigorous independent evaluation of specific practices within
the applicant's charter schools (e.g., school discipline policies or
professional development practices, such as teacher coaching), through
a quasi-experimental design study or randomized controlled trial (as
defined in this notice) that will, if well implemented, meet What Works
Clearinghouse (WWC) Evidence Standards (as defined in this notice).
The following definitions are from 34 CFR 75.225 and 77.1 and the
Final Priorities for this program.
Ambitious means promoting continued, meaningful improvement for
program participants or for other individuals or entities affected by
the grant, or representing a significant advancement in the field of
education research, practices, or methodologies. When used to describe
a performance target (as defined in this notice), whether a performance
target (as defined in this notice) is ambitious depends upon the
context of the relevant performance measure (as defined in this notice)
and the baseline (as defined in this notice) for that measure. (34 CFR
77.1)
Baseline means the starting point from which performance is
measured and targets are set. (34 CFR 77.1)
Charter management organization (CMO) is a nonprofit organization
that operates or manages multiple charter schools by centralizing or
sharing certain functions and resources among schools. (Final
Priorities)
Educationally disadvantaged students includes, but is not
necessarily limited to, individuals from low-income families (as
defined in this notice), English learners, migratory children, children
with disabilities, and neglected or delinquent children. (Final
Priorities)
High-quality charter school is a school that shows evidence of
strong academic results for the past three years (or over the life of
the school, if the school has been open for fewer than three years),
based on the following factors:
(1) Increasing student academic achievement and attainment for all
students, including, as applicable, educationally disadvantaged
students (as defined in this notice) served by the charter schools
operated or managed by the applicant.
(2) Either (i) Demonstrated success in closing historic achievement
gaps for the subgroups of students described in section
1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA at the charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant, or
(ii) No significant achievement gaps between any of the subgroups
of students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA at
the charter schools operated or managed by the applicant and
significant gains in student academic achievement with all populations
of students served by the charter schools operated or managed by the
applicant.
(3) Achieved results (including performance on statewide tests,
annual student attendance and retention rates, high school graduation
rates, college attendance rates, and college persistence rates where
applicable and available) for low-income and other educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in this notice) served by the
charter schools operated or managed by the applicant that are above the
average academic achievement results for such students in the State.
(4) No significant compliance issues (as defined in this notice),
particularly in the areas of student safety and financial management.
(Final Priorities)
Individual from a low-income family means an individual who is
determined by a State educational agency (SEA) or LEA to be a child,
age 5 through 17, from a low-income family on the basis of (a) data
used by the Secretary to determine allocations under section 1124 of
the ESEA, (b) data on children eligible for free or reduced-price
lunches under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, (c)
data on children in families receiving assistance under part A of title
IV of the Social Security Act, (d) data on children eligible to receive
medical assistance under the Medicaid program under Title XIX of the
Social Security Act, or (e) an alternate method that combines or
extrapolates from the data in items (a) through (d) of this definition
(see 20 U.S.C. 6537(3)). (Final Priorities)
Novice applicant means--
(a) Any applicant for a grant from the Department that--
(i) Has never received a grant or subgrant under the program from
which it seeks funding;
(ii) Has never been a member of a group application, submitted in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, that received a grant under the
program from which it seeks funding; and
(iii) Has not had an active discretionary grant from the Federal
government in the five years before the deadline date for applications
for new awards under the program.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, a grant
is active until the end of the grant's project or funding period,
including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee's
authority to obligate funds (34 CFR 75.225).
Performance measure means any quantitative indicator, statistic, or
metric used to gauge program or project performance. (34 CFR 77.1)
Performance target means a level of performance that an applicant
would seek to meet during the course of a project or as a result of a
project. (34 CFR 77.1)
Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an experimental design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important
respects. These studies, depending on design and implementation, can
meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with reservations (but
not What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without reservations).
(34 CFR 77.1)
Randomized controlled trial means a study that employs random
assignment of, for example, students, teachers, classrooms, schools, or
districts to receive the intervention being evaluated (the treatment
group) or not to receive the intervention (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the intervention is the difference between
the average outcome for the treatment group and for the control group.
These studies, depending on design and implementation, can meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards (as defined in this notice)
without reservations. (34 CFR 77.1)
Replicate means to open one or more new charter schools that are
based on the charter school model or models for which the applicant has
presented evidence of success. (Final Priorities)
Significant compliance issue means a violation that did, will, or
could lead to the revocation of a school's charter. (Final Priorities)
Substantially expand means to increase the student count of an
existing charter school by more than 50 percent or to add at least two
grades to an existing charter school over the course of the grant.
(Final Priorities)
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards means the standards set
forth in the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be found at the following link: //
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19. (34 CFR 77.1)
[[Page 28841]]
Program Authority: FY 2016 Appropriations Act; and the ESEA, as
amended by NCLB (20 U.S.C. 7221-7221j).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81,
82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget
Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The Final Priorities for this program. (e) The Promise
Zones Priority. (f) The Supplemental Priorities.
Note 1: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note 2: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply only to
institutions of higher education.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $65,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000 to $3,000,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $1,600,000 per year.
Estimated Number of Awards: 10-20.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
The estimated range and average size of awards are based on a single
12-month budget period.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Maximum Award: See Reasonable and Necessary Costs in section
III.3.(a) below for information regarding the maximum amount of funds
that may be awarded per new school seat and per new school.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Non-profit charter management organizations
(as defined in this notice) and other entities that are not for-profit
entities. Eligible applicants also may apply as a group or consortium.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: (a) Reasonable and Necessary Costs: The Secretary may
elect to impose maximum limits on the amount of grant funds that may be
awarded per charter school replicated (as defined in this notice), per
charter school substantially expanded (as defined in this notice), or
per new school seat created.
For this competition, the maximum limit of grant funds that may be
awarded per new school seat is $3,000, including a maximum limit per
new school created of $800,000. The maximum limit per new school seat
in a charter school that is substantially expanding (as defined in this
notice) its enrollment is $1,500, including a maximum limit per
substantially expanded (as defined in this notice) school of $800,000.
Note: Applicants must ensure that all costs included in the
proposed budget are reasonable and necessary in light of the goals and
objectives of the proposed project. Any costs determined by the
Secretary to be unreasonable or unnecessary will be removed from the
final approved budget.
(b) Other CSP Grants: A charter school that has received CSP funds
for replication or expansion previously, or that has received funds for
planning or initial implementation of a charter school (i.e., CFDA
84.282A or 84.282B), may not use funds under this grant for the same
purpose. However, such charter school may be eligible to receive funds
under this competition to substantially expand the charter school
beyond the existing grade levels or student count.
A charter school that receives funds under this competition is
ineligible to receive funds for the same purpose under section
5202(c)(2) of the ESEA, including for planning and program design or
the initial implementation of a charter school (i.e., CFDA 84.282A or
84.282B).
(c) Costs for Evaluation. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.590,
Replication and Expansion grant funds may be used to cover post-award
costs associated with an evaluation under the invitational priority or
an evaluation under Selection Criterion (e) of this notice, provided
that such costs are reasonable and necessary to meet the objectives of
the approved project.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package: Brian Martin, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W224,
Washington, DC 20202-5970. Telephone: (202) 205-9085 or by email:
brian.martin@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the program contact person listed in
this section.
2.a. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the priorities, selection
criteria, and application requirements that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. We recommend that you limit the application narrative
[Part III] to no more than 60 pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font
(including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the
resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the page
limit does apply to all of the application narrative section (Part
III).
b. Submission of Proprietary Information:
Given the types of projects that may be proposed in applications
for the Replication and Expansion grant competition, your application
may include business information that you consider proprietary. In 34
CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and describe the process we
use in determining whether any of that information is proprietary and,
thus, protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended).
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
[[Page 28842]]
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you feel is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: May 10, 2016.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: The Department will hold a pre-
application meeting via Webinar for prospective applicants on June 16,
2016, 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., Washington, DC, time. Individuals
interested in attending this meeting are encouraged to pre-register by
emailing their name, organization, and contact information with the
subject heading ``PRE-APPLICATION MEETING'' to CharterSchools@ed.gov.
There is no registration fee for attending this meeting.
For further information about the pre-application meeting, contact
Brian Martin, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4W224, Washington, DC 20202-5970. Telephone: (202) 205-9085 or by
email: brian.martin@ed.gov.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 24, 2016.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to Other Submission Requirements in section
IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 23, 2016.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grantees under this program must use the
grant funds to replicate (as defined in this notice) or substantially
expand (as defined in this notice) the charter school model or models
for which the applicant has presented evidence of success. Grant funds
must be used to carry out allowable activities, as described in section
5204(f)(3) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7221c(f)(3)).
Pursuant to section 5204(f)(3) of the ESEA, grantees under this
program must use the grant funds for--
(a) Post-award planning and design of the educational program,
which may include: (i) Refinement of the desired educational results
and of the methods for measuring progress toward achieving those
results; and (ii) professional development of teachers and other staff
who will work in the charter school; and
(b) Initial implementation of the charter school, which may
include: (i) Informing the community about the school; (ii) acquiring
necessary equipment and educational materials and supplies; (iii)
acquiring or developing curriculum materials; and (iv) other initial
operational costs that cannot be met from State or local sources.
The FY 2016 Appropriations Act authorizes the use of CSP funds
``for grants that support preschool education in charter schools.''
Therefore, an application submitted under this competition may propose
to use CSP funds to support preschool education in a charter school.
For additional information and guidance regarding the use of CSP funds
to support preschool education in charter schools, see ``Guidance on
the use of Funds to support Preschool Education,'' released in November
2014 (www2.ed.gov/programs/charter/csppreschoolfaqs.doc).
In accordance with the program requirements from the Final
Priorities, a grantee may use up to 20 percent of grant funds for
initial operational costs associated with the expansion or improvement
of the grantee's oversight or management of its charter schools,
provided that: (i) The specific charter schools being created or
substantially expanded (as defined in this notice) under the grant are
the intended beneficiaries of such expansion or improvement, and (ii)
such expansion or improvement is intended to improve the grantee's
ability to manage or oversee the charter schools created or
substantially expanded under the grant.
We reference additional regulations outlining funding restrictions
in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry), the
Government's primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet at the
following Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the
completeness and accuracy of the data you enter into the SAM database.
Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal financial
assistance under a program administered by the Department, please allow
sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN. We
strongly recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active, it may be 24 to 48
hours before you can access the information in, and submit an
application through, Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
[[Page 28843]]
Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements. Applications for grants under
this competition must be submitted electronically unless you qualify
for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the CSP Grants for Replication and
Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools, CFDA number 84.282M, must be
submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download a
copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload
and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for CSP Grants for
Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools at
www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application
package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the
CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.282, not
84.282M).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5
system home page at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific guidance and
procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov, please
refer to the Grants.gov Web site at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a read-only, non-modifiable
Portable Document Format (PDF). Do not upload an interactive or
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only,
non-modifiable PDF (e.g., Word, Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a
password-protected file, we will not review that material. Please note
that this could result in your application not being considered for
funding because the material in question--for example, the project
narrative--is critical to a meaningful review of your proposal. For
that reason it is important to allow yourself adequate time to upload
all material as PDF files. The Department will not convert material
from other formats to PDF.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by email if your application met all
the Grants.gov validation requirements or if there were any errors
(such as submission of your application by someone other than a
registered Authorized Organization Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that contains special characters). You will
be given an opportunity to correct any errors and resubmit, but you
must still meet the deadline for submission of applications.
Once your application is successfully validated by Grants.gov, the
Department will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send you
an email with a unique PR/Award number for your application.
These emails do not mean that your application is without any
disqualifying errors. While your application may have been successfully
validated by Grants.gov, it must also meet the Department's application
requirements as specified in this notice and in the application
instructions. Disqualifying errors could include, for instance, failure
to upload attachments in a read-only, non-modifiable PDF; failure to
submit a required part of the application; or failure to meet applicant
eligibility requirements. It is your responsibility to ensure that your
submitted application has met all of the Department's requirements.
[[Page 28844]]
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that the
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We will
contact you after we determinate whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply only
to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed to fully
register to submit your application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the technical problem you
experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system;
and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Brian Martin, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W224,
Washington, DC 20202-5970. FAX: (202) 205-5630.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.282M, LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
We will not consider applications postmarked after the application
deadline.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.282M, 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification
of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the application deadline
date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Application Requirements: Applications for CSP Replication and
Expansion grant funds must address the following application
requirements. An applicant may choose to respond to the application
requirements in the context of its responses to the selection criteria.
These application requirements are from the Final Priorities for
this program.
(a) Describe the objectives of the project for replicating or
substantially expanding high-quality charter schools (as defined in
this notice) and the methods by which the applicant will determine its
progress toward achieving those objectives.
(b) Describe how the applicant currently operates or manages the
charter schools for which it has
[[Page 28845]]
presented evidence of success, and how the proposed new or
substantially expanded (as defined in this notice) charter schools will
be operated or managed. Include a description of central office
functions, governance, daily operations, financial management, human
resources management, and instructional management. If applying as a
group or consortium, describe the roles and responsibilities of each
member of the group or consortium and how each member will contribute
to this project.
(c) Describe how the applicant will ensure that each proposed new
or substantially expanded charter school receives its commensurate
share of Federal education funds that are allocated by formula each
year, including during the first year of operation of the school and
any year in which the school's enrollment substantially expands (as
defined in this notice).
(d) Describe the educational program to be implemented in the
proposed new or substantially expanded charter schools, including how
the program will enable all students (including educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in this notice)) to meet State
student academic achievement standards, the grade levels or ages of
students to be served, and the curriculum and instructional practices
to be used.
Note: As part of the grants review process, an applicant currently
operating or proposing to create or substantially expand (as defined in
this notice) a single-sex charter school, or an applicant currently
providing or proposing to provide a single-sex class or single-sex
extracurricular activity within a coeducational charter school
(collectively referred to as ``single-sex educational program''), must
demonstrate that its existing or proposed single-sex educational
program is in compliance with applicable nondiscrimination laws,
including the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution (as
interpreted in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), and
other cases) and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20
U.S.C. 1681, et seq.) and its regulations, including 34 CFR 106.34.
Such an applicant likely will be required to provide fact-specific
information about the single-sex educational program within specified
timeframes. In addition, special conditions are likely to be placed on
any grant awarded to an applicant that provides a single-sex
educational program. Please see the application package for additional
information related to the requirements for single-sex educational
programs.
(e) Describe the administrative relationship between the charter
school or schools to be replicated (as defined in this notice) or
substantially expanded (as defined in this notice) by the applicant and
the authorized public chartering agency.
(f) Describe how the applicant will provide for continued operation
of the proposed new or substantially expanded charter school or schools
once the Federal grant has expired.
(g) Describe how parents and other members of the community will be
involved in the planning, program design, and implementation of the
proposed new or substantially expanded (as defined in this notice)
charter school or schools.
(h) Include a request and justification for waivers of any Federal
statutory or regulatory provisions that the applicant believes are
necessary for the successful operation of the proposed new or
substantially expanded charter schools.
(i) Describe how the grant funds will be used, including how these
funds will be used in conjunction with other Federal programs
administered by the Secretary, and with any matching funds.
(j) Describe how all students in the community, including students
with disabilities, English learners, and other educationally
disadvantaged students (as defined in this notice), will be informed
about the proposed new or substantially expanded (as defined in this
notice) charter schools and given an equal opportunity to attend such
schools.
Note: Under section 5210(1)(H) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7221i(1)(H)), charter schools receiving CSP funds must admit
students on the basis of a lottery if more students apply for
admission than can be accommodated. Accordingly, the application
must include a description of the applicant's admissions policy,
including the lottery that will be employed by each charter school
that is oversubscribed.
(k) Describe how the proposed new or substantially expanded charter
schools that are considered to be LEAs under State law, or the LEAs in
which the new or substantially expanded (as defined in this notice)
charter schools are located, will comply with sections 613(a)(5) and
613(e)(1)(B) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
(l) Provide information on any significant compliance issues (as
defined in this notice) identified within the past three years for each
school managed by the applicant, including compliance issues in the
areas of student safety, financial management, and statutory or
regulatory compliance.
(m) For each charter school currently operated or managed by the
applicant, provide the following information: The year founded, the
grades currently served, the number of students, the address, the
percentage of students in each subgroup of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA, results on the State
assessment for the past three years (if available) by subgroup,
attendance rates, student attrition rates for the past three years, and
(if the school operates a 12th grade) high school graduation rates and
college attendance rates (maintaining standards to protect personally
identifiable information).
(n) Provide objective data showing applicant quality. In
particular, the Secretary requires the applicant to provide the
following data:
(1) Performance (school-wide and by subgroup) for the past three
years (if available) on statewide tests of all charter schools operated
or managed by the applicant as compared to all students in other
schools in the State or States at the same grade level, and as compared
with other schools serving similar demographics of students
(maintaining standards to protect personally identifiable information);
(2) Annual student attendance and retention rates (school-wide and
by subgroup) for the past three years (or over the life of the school,
if the school has been open for fewer than three years), and
comparisons with other similar schools (maintaining standards to
protect personally identifiable information); and
(3) Where applicable and available, high school graduation rates,
college attendance rates, and college persistence rates (school-wide
and by subgroup) for the past three years (if available) of students
attending schools operated or managed by the applicant, and the
methodology used to calculate these rates (maintaining standards to
protect personally identifiable information). When reporting data for
schools in States that may have particularly demanding or low standards
of proficiency, applicants are invited to discuss how their academic
success might be considered against applicants from across the country.
(o) Provide such other information and assurances as the Secretary
may require.
2. Selection Criteria. The selection criteria for this program are
from the Final Priorities for this program and 34 CFR 75.210. The
maximum possible score for addressing all of the criteria in this
section is 100 points. The maximum possible score for addressing
[[Page 28846]]
each criterion is indicated in parentheses following the criterion.
In evaluating an application, the Secretary considers the following
criteria:
(a) Quality of the eligible applicant. (Final Priorities) (50
points)
In determining the quality of the applicant, the Secretary
considers the following factors--
(1) The degree, including the consistency over the past three
years, to which the applicant has demonstrated success in significantly
increasing student academic achievement and attainment for all
students, including, as applicable, educationally disadvantaged
students (as defined in this notice) served by the charter schools
operated or managed by the applicant (20 points).
(2) Either--
(i) The degree, including the consistency over the past three
years, to which the applicant has demonstrated success in closing
historic achievement gaps for the subgroups of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA at the charter schools
operated or managed by the applicant, or
(ii) The degree, including the consistency over the past three
years, to which there have not been significant achievement gaps
between any of the subgroups of students described in section
1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA at the charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant and to which significant gains in student
academic achievement have been made with all populations of students
served by the charter schools operated or managed by the applicant (15
points).
(3) The degree, including the consistency over the past three
years, to which the applicant has achieved results (including
performance on statewide tests, annual student attendance and retention
rates, high school graduation rates, college attendance rates, and
college persistence rates where applicable and available) for low-
income and other educationally disadvantaged students (as defined in
this notice) served by the charter schools operated or managed by the
applicant that are significantly above the average academic achievement
results for such students in the State (15 points).
(b) Contribution in assisting educationally disadvantaged students.
(Final Priorities) (10 points)
The contribution the proposed project will make in assisting
educationally disadvantaged students (as defined in this notice) served
by the applicant to meet or exceed State academic content standards and
State student academic achievement standards, and to graduate college-
and career-ready. When responding to this selection criterion,
applicants must discuss the proposed locations of schools to be created
or substantially expanded and the student populations to be served.
(c) Quality of the project design. (Final Priorities) (10 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are
clearly specified, measurable, and attainable. Applicants proposing to
open schools serving substantially different populations than those
currently served by the model for which they have demonstrated evidence
of success must address the attainability of outcomes given this
difference.
(d) Quality of the management plan and personnel. (Final
Priorities) (20 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan and
personnel to replicate and substantially expand high-quality charter
schools (as defined in this notice). In determining the quality of the
management plan and personnel for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers--
(1) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks (4 points).
(2) The business plan for improving, sustaining, and ensuring the
quality and performance of charter schools created or substantially
expanded (as defined in this notice) under these grants beyond the
initial period of Federal funding in areas including, but not limited
to, facilities, financial management, central office, student academic
achievement, governance, oversight, and human resources of the charter
schools (4 points).
(3) A multi-year financial and operating model for the
organization, a demonstrated commitment of current and future partners,
and evidence of broad support from stakeholders critical to the
project's long-term success (4 points).
(4) The plan for closing charter schools supported, overseen, or
managed by the applicant that do not meet high standards of quality (2
points).
(5) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of the project director, chief executive officer or organization
leader, and key project personnel, especially in managing projects of
the size and scope of the proposed project (6 points).
(e) Quality of the evaluation plan. (34 CFR 75.210(h)(2)(iv)) (10
points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the extent to which the methods of
evaluation include the use of objective performance measures (as
defined in this notice) that are clearly related to the intended
outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative
data to the extent possible.
3. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
4. Risk Assessment and Special Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose special conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
[[Page 28847]]
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
4. Performance Measures: (a) The goal of the CSP is to support the
creation and development of a large number of high-quality charter
schools (as defined in this notice) that are free from State or local
rules that inhibit flexible operation, are held accountable for
enabling students to reach challenging State performance standards, and
are open to all students. The Secretary has two performance indicators
to measure progress towards this goal: (1) The number of charter
schools in operation around the Nation, and (2) the percentage of
fourth- and eighth-grade charter school students who are achieving at
or above the proficient level on State assessments in mathematics and
reading/language arts. Additionally, the Secretary has established the
following measure to examine the efficiency of the CSP: Federal cost
per student in implementing a successful school (defined as a school in
operation for three or more consecutive years).
(b) Project-Specific Performance Measures. Applicants must propose
project-specific performance measures (as defined in this notice) and
performance targets (as defined in this notice) consistent with the
objectives of the proposed project. Applications must provide the
following information as directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
(1) Performance measures. How each proposed performance measure (as
defined in this notice) would accurately measure the performance of the
project and how the proposed performance measure (as defined in this
notice) would be consistent with the performance measures (as defined
in this notice) established for the program funding the competition.
(2) Baseline data. (i) Why each proposed baseline (as defined in
this notice) is valid; or (ii) if the applicant has determined that
there are no established baseline (as defined in this notice) data for
a particular performance measure (as defined in this notice), an
explanation of why there is no established baseline (as defined in this
notice) and of how and when, during the project period, the applicant
would establish a valid baseline (as defined in this notice) for the
performance measure (as defined in this notice).
(3) Performance targets. Why each proposed performance target (as
defined in this notice) is ambitious (as defined in this notice) yet
achievable compared to the baseline (as defined in this notice) for the
performance measure (as defined in this notice) and when, during the
project period, the applicant would meet the performance target(s) (as
defined in this notice).
(4) The applicant must also describe in the application: (i) The
data collection and reporting methods the applicant would use and why
those methods are likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful
performance data, and (ii) the applicant's capacity to collect and
report reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data, as evidenced
by high-quality data collection, analysis, and reporting in other
projects or research.
All grantees must submit an annual performance report with
information that is responsive to these performance measures (as
defined in this notice).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets (as defined in this notice) in the grantee's
approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Martin, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W224, Washington, DC 20202-
5970. Telephone: (202) 205-9085 or by email: brian.martin@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-
8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you
must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2016-10925 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P