Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determinations, 23749 [2016-09338]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Issued: April 18, 2016. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–462 and 731– TA–1156–1158 (First Review) and 731–TA– 1043–1045 (Second Review)] [FR Doc. 2016–09338 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that revocation of the countervailing duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from Vietnam and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17490) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct full reviews (80 FR 43118, July 21, 2015). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on October 15, 2015 (80 FR 62110). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2016, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 18, 2016. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4605 (April 2016), entitled Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–462 and 731–TA–1156– 1158 (First Review) and 731–TA–1043– 1045 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:18 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–939] Certain Three-Dimensional Cinema Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Extend the Target Date; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Certain Issues U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to extend the target date for completion of the above-captioned investigation until June 1, 2016. The Commission also requests briefing from the parties on the issues indicated in this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3438. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 12, 2014, based on a complaint filed by RealD, Inc. of Beverly Hills, California (‘‘RealD’’). 79 FR 73902–03 (Dec. 12, 2014). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain three-dimensional cinema systems, and components thereof, that SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23749 infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,905,602 (‘‘the ’602 patent’’), 7,857,455 (‘‘the ’455 patent’’), 7,959,296 (‘‘the ’296 patent’’), and 8,220,934 (‘‘the ’934 patent’’). Id. at 73902. The notice of investigation named as respondents MasterImage 3D, Inc. of Sherman Oaks, California, and MasterImage 3D Asia, LLC of Seoul, Republic of Korea. Id. at 73903. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was not named as a party to the investigation. Id. On July 23, 2015, the Commission later terminated the investigation as to various of the asserted claims and the ’602 patent in its entirety. Notice (July 23, 2015) (determining not to review Order No. 6 (July 2, 2015)); Notice (Aug. 20, 2015) (determining not to review Order No. 7 (Aug. 3, 2015)). On September 25, 2015, the Commission determined on summary determination that RealD satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement through its significant investment in plant, significant investment in labor, and substantial investment in engineering, research, and development. Notice (Sept. 25, 2015) (determining to review in part Order No. 9 (Aug. 20, 2015)). The Commission, however, reversed the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) summary determination with respect to RealD’s investment in equipment. Id. On December 16, 2015, the ALJ issued a final ID finding a violation of section 337 with respect to the remaining asserted patents. The ALJ found that the asserted claims of each patent are infringed and not invalid or unenforceable. The ALJ found that the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement was satisfied for the asserted patents. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding (‘‘RD’’), recommending that a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders should issue and that a bond of 100 percent should be imposed during the period of presidential review. On December 29, 2015, MasterImage filed a petition for review challenging various findings in the final ID. On January 6, 2016, RealD filed a response to MasterImage’s petition. On January 15, 2016, and January 19, 2016, MasterImage and RealD respectively filed post-RD statements on the public interest under Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4). The Commission did not receive any post-RD public interest comments from the public in response to the Commission notice issued on December 22, 2015. 80 FR 80795 (Dec. 28, 2015). E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 23749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09338]



[[Page 23749]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-462 and 731-TA-1156-1158 (First Review) and 
731-TA-1043-1045 (Second Review)]


Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, 
Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that 
revocation of the countervailing duty order on polyethylene retail 
carrier bags from Vietnam and revocation of the antidumping duty orders 
on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, 
Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on April 1, 2015 (80 
FR 17490) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct full 
reviews (80 FR 43118, July 21, 2015). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on October 15, 2015 
(80 FR 62110). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on February 18, 
2016, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed 
its determinations in these reviews on April 18, 2016. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4605 (April 2016), 
entitled Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China, Indonesia, 
Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-462 
and 731-TA-1156-1158 (First Review) and 731-TA-1043-1045 (Second 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 18, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-09338 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P