Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 22999-23001 [2016-09020]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22999
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology,
Physiology, and Biological Chemistry
Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative
Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research
and Research Training, National Institutes of
Health, HHS)
Dated: April 13, 2016.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–08992 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Opioid Drugs in
Maintenance and Detoxification
Treatment of Opioid Dependence—42
CFR part 8 (OMB No. 0930–0206) and
Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs)—
Revision
42 CFR part 8 establishes a
certification program managed by
SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment (CSAT). The regulation
requires that Opioid Treatment
Programs (OTPs) be certified.
‘‘Certification’’ is the process by which
SAMHSA determines that an OTP is
qualified to provide opioid treatment
under the Federal opioid treatment
standards established by the Secretary
of Health and Human Services. To
become certified, an OTP must be
accredited by a SAMHSA-approved
accreditation body. The regulation also
provides standards for such services as
individualized treatment planning,
increased medical supervision, and
assessment of patient outcomes. This
submission seeks continued approval of
the information collection requirements
in the regulation and of the forms used
in implementing the regulation.
SAMHSA currently has approval for
the Application for Certification to Use
Opioid Drugs in a Treatment Program
Under 42 CFR 8.11 (Form SMA–162);
the Application for Approval as
Accreditation Body Under 42 CFR 8.3(b)
(Form SMA–163); and the Exception
Request and Record of Justification
Under 42 CFR 8.12 (Form SMA–168),
which may be used by physicians when
there is a patient care situation in which
the physician must make a treatment
decision that differs from the treatment
regimen required by the regulation.
Form SMA–168 is a simplified,
standardized form to facilitate the
documentation, request, and approval
process for exceptions.
SAMHSA believes that the
recordkeeping requirements in the
regulation are customary and usual
practices within the medical and
rehabilitative communities and has not
calculated a response burden for them.
The recordkeeping requirements set
forth in 42 CFR 8.4, 8.11, and 8.12
include maintenance of the following: 5year retention by accreditation bodies of
certain records pertaining to
accreditation, and documentation by an
OTP of the following: A patient’s
medical examination when admitted to
treatment, a patient’s history, a
treatment plan, any prenatal support
provided to the patient, justification of
unusually large initial doses, changes in
a patient’s dosage schedule, justification
of unusually large daily doses, the
rationale for decreasing a patient’s clinic
attendance, and documentation of
physiologic dependence.
The rule also includes requirements
that OTPs and accreditation
organizations disclose information. For
example, 42 CFR 8.12(e)(1) requires that
a physician explain the facts concerning
the use of opioid drug treatment to each
patient. This type of disclosure is
considered to be consistent with the
common medical practice and is not
considered an additional burden.
Further, the rule requires, under Sec.
8.4(i)(1) that accreditation organizations
shall make public their fee structure;
this type of disclosure is standard
business practice and is not considered
a burden.
A number of changes have been made
to the forms. Forms have been reworded
for clarification, updated with current
SAMHSA mailing and web-submission
information, and a few additional fields
have been provided for clarity and for
providers to best explain their services
(e.g., expanding the former global
patient census in the SMA–162 to
request patient census by drug type—
methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone,
or other) and the needs of their patients
(e.g., including urinalysis results on the
SMA–168 and adding ‘‘weather crisis’’
as a standard option for physician
justification of the requested exception).
Amendments also include the removal
of information pertaining to faxing the
forms to SAMHSA, as this is no longer
an acceptable form of submission. The
burden hours have increased slightly
(by 28% or approximately 639 hours)
due to an increase in the number of
facilities accredited and certified by
SAMHSA since the previous
submissions of these forms. The forms
are available online with a unique
feature for both the SMA–162 and
SMA–168 that pre-populates certain
information within the form. This in
turn reduces the program’s time spent
filling out the forms as well as the staff
time spent on processing it.
The tables that follow summarize the
annual reporting burden associated with
the regulation, including burden
associated with the forms.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT BURDEN FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES
Number of
respondents
42 CFR citation
Purpose
8.3(b)(1–11) .........
Initial approval (SMA–163) ................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Responses/
respondent
1
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total
responses
1
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
Hours/
response
1
19APN1
6.00
Total
hours
6.00
23000
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT BURDEN FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES—Continued
Number of
respondents
42 CFR citation
Purpose
8.3(c) ....................
8.3(e) ....................
8.3(f)(2) ................
Renewal of approval (SMA–163) ......
Relinquishment notification ................
Non-renewal notification to accredited OTPs.
Notification to SAMHSA for seriously
noncompliant OTPs.
Notification to OTP for serious noncompliance.
General documents and information
to SAMHSA upon request.
Accreditation survey to SAMHSA
upon request.
List of surveys, surveyors to
SAMHSA upon request.
Report of less than full accreditation
to SAMHSA.
Summaries of Inspections .................
Notifications of Complaints ................
Revocation notification to Accredited
OTPs.
Submission of 90-day corrective plan
to SAMHSA.
Notification to accredited OTPs of
Probationary Status.
8.4(b)(1)(ii) ...........
8.4(b)(1)(iii) ..........
8.4(d)(1) ...............
8.4(d)(2) ...............
8.4(d)(3) ...............
8.4(d)(4) ...............
8.4(d)(5) ...............
8.4(e) ....................
8.6(a)(2) and
(b)(3).
8.6(b) ....................
8.6(b)(1) ...............
Sub Total ......
Responses/
respondent
Total
responses
Hours/
response
Total
hours
2
1
1
2
1
90
1.00
0.50
0.10
2.00
0.50
9.00
2
2
4
1.00
4.00
2
10
20
1.00
20.00
6
5
30
0.50
15.00
6
75
450
0.02
9.00
6
6
36
0.20
7.20
6
5
30
0.50
15.00
6
12
1
50
6
185
300
72
185
0.50
0.50
0.30
150.00
36.00
55.50
1
1
1
10.00
10.00
1
185
185
0.30
55.50
54
............................................................
1
1
90
........................
1,407
........................
394.70
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT BURDEN FOR OPIOID TREATMENT PROGRAMS
Number of
respondents
42 CFR citation
Purpose
8.11(b) ..................
8.11(b) ..................
8.11(e)(1) .............
Renewal of approval (SMA–162) ......
Relocation of Program (SMA–162) ...
Application for provisional certification.
Application for extension of provisional certification.
Notification of sponsor or medical director change (SMA–162).
Documentation to SAMHSA for interim maintenance.
Request to SAMHSA for Exemption
from 8.11 and 8.12 (including
SMA–168).
Notification to SAMHSA Before Establishing Medication Units (SMA–
162).
Notification to State Health Officer
When Patient Begins Interim Maintenance.
Contents of Appellant Request for
Review of Suspension.
Informal Review Request ..................
Appellant’s Review File and Written
Statement.
Appellant’s Request for Expedited
Review.
Appellant Review File and Written
Statement.
8.11(e)(2) .............
8.11(f)(5) ..............
8.11(g)(2) .............
8.11(h) ..................
8.11(i)(1) ..............
8.12(j)(2) ..............
8.24 ......................
8.25(a) ..................
8.26(a) ..................
8.28(a) ..................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8.28(c) ..................
Responses/
respondent
Total
responses
Hours/
response
Total
hours
386
35
42
1
1
1
386
35
42
0.15
1.17
1.00
57.90
40.95
42.00
30
1
30
0.25
7.50
60
1
60
0.10
6.00
1
1
1
1.00
1.00
1,325
25
33,125
0.07
2,318.75
10
1
10
0.25
2.50
1
20
20
0.33
6.60
2
1
2
0.25
.50
2
2
1
1
2
2
1.00
5.00
2.00
10.00
2
1
2
1.00
2.00
2
1
2
5.00
10.00
Sub Total ......
............................................................
1,900
........................
33,719
........................
2,507.70
Total .......
............................................................
1,954
........................
35,126
........................
2,902.40
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57B,
Rockville, MD 20857 or email a copy at
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written
comments should be received by June
20, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016–09020 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0291]
Cooperative Research and
Development Agreement: Troposcatter
Communications Exploratory
Development
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of intent; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
ACTION:
The Coast Guard announces
its intent to enter into a Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement
(CRADA) with Comtech Systems, Inc.,
Coast Guard
to investigate the potential operational
use of troposcatter technology. The
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0104]
research includes employment of their
Modular Transportable Transmission
Navigation and Vessel Inspection
System (MTTS) in northern Alaska to
Circular (NVIC) No. 02–16; Inspection
establish beyond line of sight (BLOS)
Guidance for Sail Rigging and Masts
network links without using existing
on Inspected Sailing Vessels
infrastructure or satellite
communications. Specifically, the
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
MTTS will provide a wireless IEEE
ACTION: Notice of availability.
802.3 (Ethernet) data link between two
locations separated by long distances
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
and elevated terrain. The MTTS will be
the availability of NVIC 02–16. This
setup in locations with no shelter/
Circular provides guidance to vessel
owners, riggers, marine surveyors, other protection from the Northern Alaskan
environment. A Pilot Demonstration
marine service providers, and Coast
schedule has been proposed in which
Guard marine inspectors regarding
Comtech Systems will provide their
inspection of sail rigging, masts, and
MTTS to connect two points separated
associated components for commercial
by 68 miles with a 3000 foot elevation
sailing vessels and the use of
in between. The Coast Guard Research
preventative maintenance as a good
and Development Center (R&D Center)
marine practice. It provides guidance for
will prepare a Pilot Demonstration
the purpose of assisting vessel owners
Assessment Plan and Comtech Systems
and operators, and U.S. Coast Guard
will operate the equipment for
personnel with the inspection and
exploratory development over a one
recommended documentation of
week period to collect information on
maintenance for sail rigging and masts
suitability, reliability, maintenance
on inspected sailing vessels. It is
requirements, and ease of use. While the
intended to enhance consistency with
Coast Guard is currently considering
the Coast Guard inspection process for
partnering with Comtech Systems, Inc.,
the commercial sailing fleet.
the agency is soliciting public comment
DATES: NVIC 02–16 is available on April on the possible nature of and
13, 2016.
participation of other parties in the
ADDRESSES: This NVIC is available at the proposed CRADA. In addition, the Coast
Guard also invites other potential nonfollowing Coast Guard Web site: https://
Federal participants to propose similar
www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/nvic/.
CRADAs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
DATES: Comments must be submitted to
you have questions on this notice, call
the online docket via https://
LCDR James T. Fogle, Office of
www.regulations.gov, or reach the
Commercial Vessel Compliance, Coast
Guard, telephone 202—372–1216, email Docket Management Facility, on or
before May 19, 2016.
James.T.Fogle@uscg.mil.
Synopses of proposals regarding
Dated: April 13, 2016.
future CRADAs must reach the Coast
Paul F. Thomas,
Guard (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
USCG, Assistant Commandant for Prevention CONTACT) on or before May 19, 2016.
Policy.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments online at
[FR Doc. 2016–09022 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
https://www.regulations.gov in
accordance with Web site instructions.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23001
If
you have questions on this notice or
wish to submit proposals for future
CRADAs, contact LCDR Samuel Nassar,
Project Official, C4ISR Branch, U.S.
Coast Guard Research and Development
Center, 1 Chelsea Street, New London,
CT 06320, telephone 860–271–2727,
email samuel.r.nassar@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We request public comments on this
notice. Although we do not plan to
respond to comments in the Federal
Register, we will respond directly to
commenters and may modify our
proposal in light of comments.
Comments should be marked with
docket number USCG–2016–0291and
should provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
should provide personal contact
information so that we can contact you
if we have questions regarding your
comments; but please note that all
comments will be posted to the online
docket without change and that any
personal information you include can be
searchable online (see the Federal
Register Privacy Act notice regarding
our public dockets, 73 FR 3316, Jan. 17,
2008). We also accept anonymous
comments.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the Coast
Guard (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). Documents mentioned in this
notice and all public comments, are in
our online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that Web site’s
instructions. Additionally, if you go to
the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when
comments are posted or a final rule is
published.
Do not submit detailed proposals for
future CRADAs to the Docket
Management Facility. Instead, submit
them directly to the Coast Guard (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Discussion
CRADAs are authorized under 15
U.S.C. 3710(a).1 A CRADA promotes the
transfer of technology to the private
sector for commercial use, as well as
specified research or development
1 The statute confers this authority on the head of
each Federal agency. The Secretary of DHS’s
authority is delegated to the Coast Guard and other
DHS organizational elements by DHS Delegation
No. 0160.1, para. II.B.34.
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22999-23001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09020]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Opioid Drugs in Maintenance and Detoxification
Treatment of Opioid Dependence--42 CFR part 8 (OMB No. 0930-0206) and
Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs)--Revision
42 CFR part 8 establishes a certification program managed by
SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). The regulation
requires that Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) be certified.
``Certification'' is the process by which SAMHSA determines that an OTP
is qualified to provide opioid treatment under the Federal opioid
treatment standards established by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services. To become certified, an OTP must be accredited by a SAMHSA-
approved accreditation body. The regulation also provides standards for
such services as individualized treatment planning, increased medical
supervision, and assessment of patient outcomes. This submission seeks
continued approval of the information collection requirements in the
regulation and of the forms used in implementing the regulation.
SAMHSA currently has approval for the Application for Certification
to Use Opioid Drugs in a Treatment Program Under 42 CFR 8.11 (Form SMA-
162); the Application for Approval as Accreditation Body Under 42 CFR
8.3(b) (Form SMA-163); and the Exception Request and Record of
Justification Under 42 CFR 8.12 (Form SMA-168), which may be used by
physicians when there is a patient care situation in which the
physician must make a treatment decision that differs from the
treatment regimen required by the regulation. Form SMA-168 is a
simplified, standardized form to facilitate the documentation, request,
and approval process for exceptions.
SAMHSA believes that the recordkeeping requirements in the
regulation are customary and usual practices within the medical and
rehabilitative communities and has not calculated a response burden for
them. The recordkeeping requirements set forth in 42 CFR 8.4, 8.11, and
8.12 include maintenance of the following: 5-year retention by
accreditation bodies of certain records pertaining to accreditation,
and documentation by an OTP of the following: A patient's medical
examination when admitted to treatment, a patient's history, a
treatment plan, any prenatal support provided to the patient,
justification of unusually large initial doses, changes in a patient's
dosage schedule, justification of unusually large daily doses, the
rationale for decreasing a patient's clinic attendance, and
documentation of physiologic dependence.
The rule also includes requirements that OTPs and accreditation
organizations disclose information. For example, 42 CFR 8.12(e)(1)
requires that a physician explain the facts concerning the use of
opioid drug treatment to each patient. This type of disclosure is
considered to be consistent with the common medical practice and is not
considered an additional burden. Further, the rule requires, under Sec.
8.4(i)(1) that accreditation organizations shall make public their fee
structure; this type of disclosure is standard business practice and is
not considered a burden.
A number of changes have been made to the forms. Forms have been
reworded for clarification, updated with current SAMHSA mailing and
web-submission information, and a few additional fields have been
provided for clarity and for providers to best explain their services
(e.g., expanding the former global patient census in the SMA-162 to
request patient census by drug type--methadone, buprenorphine,
naltrexone, or other) and the needs of their patients (e.g., including
urinalysis results on the SMA-168 and adding ``weather crisis'' as a
standard option for physician justification of the requested
exception). Amendments also include the removal of information
pertaining to faxing the forms to SAMHSA, as this is no longer an
acceptable form of submission. The burden hours have increased slightly
(by 28% or approximately 639 hours) due to an increase in the number of
facilities accredited and certified by SAMHSA since the previous
submissions of these forms. The forms are available online with a
unique feature for both the SMA-162 and SMA-168 that pre-populates
certain information within the form. This in turn reduces the program's
time spent filling out the forms as well as the staff time spent on
processing it.
The tables that follow summarize the annual reporting burden
associated with the regulation, including burden associated with the
forms.
Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Accreditation Bodies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Total Hours/
42 CFR citation Purpose respondents respondent responses response Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.3(b)(1-11)........................... Initial approval (SMA-163)..... 1 1 1 6.00 6.00
[[Page 23000]]
8.3(c)................................. Renewal of approval (SMA-163).. 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
8.3(e)................................. Relinquishment notification.... 1 1 1 0.50 0.50
8.3(f)(2).............................. Non-renewal notification to 1 90 90 0.10 9.00
accredited OTPs.
8.4(b)(1)(ii).......................... Notification to SAMHSA for 2 2 4 1.00 4.00
seriously noncompliant OTPs.
8.4(b)(1)(iii)......................... Notification to OTP for serious 2 10 20 1.00 20.00
noncompliance.
8.4(d)(1).............................. General documents and 6 5 30 0.50 15.00
information to SAMHSA upon
request.
8.4(d)(2).............................. Accreditation survey to SAMHSA 6 75 450 0.02 9.00
upon request.
8.4(d)(3).............................. List of surveys, surveyors to 6 6 36 0.20 7.20
SAMHSA upon request.
8.4(d)(4).............................. Report of less than full 6 5 30 0.50 15.00
accreditation to SAMHSA.
8.4(d)(5).............................. Summaries of Inspections....... 6 50 300 0.50 150.00
8.4(e)................................. Notifications of Complaints.... 12 6 72 0.50 36.00
8.6(a)(2) and (b)(3)................... Revocation notification to 1 185 185 0.30 55.50
Accredited OTPs.
8.6(b)................................. Submission of 90-day corrective 1 1 1 10.00 10.00
plan to SAMHSA.
8.6(b)(1).............................. Notification to accredited OTPs 1 185 185 0.30 55.50
of Probationary Status.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub Total.......................... ............................... 54 .............. 1,407 .............. 394.70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Opioid Treatment Programs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Total Hours/
42 CFR citation Purpose respondents respondent responses response Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.11(b)................................ Renewal of approval (SMA-162).. 386 1 386 0.15 57.90
8.11(b)................................ Relocation of Program (SMA-162) 35 1 35 1.17 40.95
8.11(e)(1)............................. Application for provisional 42 1 42 1.00 42.00
certification.
8.11(e)(2)............................. Application for extension of 30 1 30 0.25 7.50
provisional certification.
8.11(f)(5)............................. Notification of sponsor or 60 1 60 0.10 6.00
medical director change (SMA-
162).
8.11(g)(2)............................. Documentation to SAMHSA for 1 1 1 1.00 1.00
interim maintenance.
8.11(h)................................ Request to SAMHSA for Exemption 1,325 25 33,125 0.07 2,318.75
from 8.11 and 8.12 (including
SMA-168).
8.11(i)(1)............................. Notification to SAMHSA Before 10 1 10 0.25 2.50
Establishing Medication Units
(SMA-162).
8.12(j)(2)............................. Notification to State Health 1 20 20 0.33 6.60
Officer When Patient Begins
Interim Maintenance.
8.24................................... Contents of Appellant Request 2 1 2 0.25 .50
for Review of Suspension.
8.25(a)................................ Informal Review Request........ 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
8.26(a)................................ Appellant's Review File and 2 1 2 5.00 10.00
Written Statement.
8.28(a)................................ Appellant's Request for 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
Expedited Review.
8.28(c)................................ Appellant Review File and 2 1 2 5.00 10.00
Written Statement.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub Total.......................... ............................... 1,900 .............. 33,719 .............. 2,507.70
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................... ............................... 1,954 .............. 35,126 .............. 2,902.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 23001]]
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57B, Rockville, MD 20857 or email a copy at
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received by June
20, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016-09020 Filed 4-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
