Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 21662-21663 [2016-08362]
Download as PDF
21662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Notices
petition and Mercedes is consequently
obligated to provide notification of, and
a free remedy for, that noncompliance
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Gregory K. Rea,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016–08361 Filed 4–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0098; Notice 2]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC,
Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
Continental Tire the
Americas, LLC (CTA), has determined
that certain Continental Tire brand
T-type spare tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S4.3(a) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
109, New Pneumatic and Certain
Specialty Tires. CTA has filed a report
dated August 25, 2015 and amended on
October 1, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
ADDRESSES: For further information on
this decision contact Abraham Diaz,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5310, facsimile (202) 366–
5930.
SUMMARY:
I.
Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published with a 30-day public
comment period, on October 29, 2015 in
the Federal Register (80 FR 66613). No
comments were received. To view the
petition and all supporting documents
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site
at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2015–
0098.’’
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 3,627 Continental Tire
brand CST 17 size T125/70R17 98M
temporary spare tires sold to General
Motors and also in small quantities in
the replacement market. These tires
were manufactured between March 18,
2012 and April 11, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains
that the noncompliance is that the tire
size designation markings on the
sidewalls of the subject tires do not
contain the tire type code designator
symbol from The Tire and Rim
Association yearbook as required by
paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109.
Specifically, the subject tire size reads
‘‘125/70R17 98M’’ but should read
‘‘T125/70R17 98M’’ indicating the tire is
a spare tire and for temporary use.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3(a) of
FMVSS No. 109 requires in pertinent
part:
S4.3 Labeling Requirements. Except as
provided in S4.3.1 and S4.3.2 of this
standard, each tire, except for those certified
to comply with S5.5 of § 571.139, shall have
permanently molded into or onto both
sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less
than 0.078 inches high, the information
shown in paragraphs S4.3(a) through (g) of
this standard. On at least one sidewall, the
information shall be positioned in an area
between the maximum section width and
bead of the tire, unless the maximum section
width of the tire falls between the bead and
one-fourth of the distance from the bead to
the shoulder of the tire. . . .
(a) One size designation, except that
equivalent inch and metric size designations
may be used; . . .
V. Summary of CTA’s Analyses: CTA
stated that the only missing marking on
the sidewalls of the affected tires is the
letter ‘‘T’’ as part of the size designation.
CTA also stated its belief that the
omission of the tire size designation
markings has no impact on the
operational performance or durability of
these tires or on the safety of vehicles
on which these tires may be mounted
and that the affected tires cannot be
confused with normal P-metric or
metric passenger tires for the following
reasons:
1. Both sidewalls of the affected tires
have permanently molded letters that
are 1⁄2 inch tall with the words
‘‘TEMPORARY USE ONLY.’’
2. Both sidewalls of the affected tires
have permanently molded letters and
numerals that are 1⁄2 inch tall with the
words ‘‘INFLATE TO 420KPA (60PSI),’’
as required by section S4.3.5 of FMVSS
No. 109.
3. The affected tires are intended as
spare tires for the Chevy Impala, which
is equipped with four ground tires of
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
size P235[/]55R17 98W. The ground
tires are significantly different in width
(approximately four inches wider) and
in diameter (approximately three inches
larger) than the subject spare tires.
4. The affected tires also have a
starting tread depth of only 3/32 inch,
whereas a typical P-metric or metric
passenger tire has a much deeper tread
depth of approximately 10/32 inch.
CTA also noted that they are not
aware of any crashes, injuries, customer
complaints or field reports associated
with this noncompliance.
In addition, CTA informed NHTSA
that it has corrected the mold at the
manufacturing plant so that no
additional tires will be manufactured
with the subject noncompliance and
that all remaining CTA inventory of the
subject tires in their possession have
been scrapped.
CTA also made reference to
inconsequential noncompliance
petitions that NHTSA previously
granted concerning noncompliances
that CTA believes are similar to the
subject noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
CTA from providing recall notification
of noncompliance as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA’s Decision
NHTSA’s Analysis: Labeling the tire
size ‘‘125/70R17’’ instead of ‘‘T125/
70R17,’’ violates paragraph S4.3(a) of
FMVSS No. 109 because the tire is
labeled with an incomplete tire size
designation for temporary use tires, also
referred to as spare tires.
NHTSA bases its decision on several
points. First, CTS labeled the subject
tires on both sidewalls with the words
‘‘TEMPORARY USE ONLY’’ and
‘‘INFLATE TO 420KPA (60PSI).’’ The
maximum pressure labeled on the
subject tires correlates with the pressure
specified for all temporary use tires in
the TRA’s tire publication. Together,
these additional labels provide the user
with the same information intended by
the missing labels, and by spelling out
the word TEMPORARY, provides that
information in clear format. All other
sidewall labels and safety information
are correct.
Next, NHTSA agrees that the subject
tires would not be confused with nontemporary tires used on vehicles for
which the tires are intended because of
the differences in geometry of the two
types of tires. CTA indicated that the
subject tires are approximately four
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Notices
inches narrower and three inches
smaller in diameter than the nontemporary tires that would be used on
the vehicle for which the subject tires
are also intended.
Finally, neither CTA nor NHTSA are
aware of any crashes, injuries, customer
complaints or field reports associated
with the omitted labeling.
NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration
of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that CTA
has met its burden of persuasion that
the subject FMVSS No. 109
noncompliance in the affected tires is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, CTA’s petition is hereby
granted and CTA is consequently
exempted from the obligation of
providing notification of, and a free
remedy for, that noncompliance under
49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject tires
that CTA no longer controlled at the
time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
equipment distributors and dealers of
the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after CTA notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–08362 Filed 4–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0101; Notice 2]
Morgan 3 Wheeler Limited, Denial of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Denial of petition.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Morgan 3 Wheeler Limited
(Morgan) has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2012 and 2013 Morgan
model M3W three-wheeled motorcycles
do not comply with all of the
requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108,
Lamps, reflective devices, and
associated equipment. Specifically, the
vehicles’ headlamps are spaced further
apart than permitted, and do not have
the required ‘‘DOT’’ marking. Morgan
has petitioned for an exemption from
the recall notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301—
‘‘Motor Vehicle Safety’’ (Vehicle Safety
Act) on the grounds that the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. This notice
announces and explains NHTSA’s
denial of Morgan’s petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this decision
contact Mike Cole, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
telephone (202) 366–2334, facsimile
(202) 366–5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49
CFR part 556, Morgan has petitioned for
an exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on December 9, 2013
in the Federal Register (78 FR 73920).
One comment was received from Peter
C. Larsen of Liberty Motors, LLC. To
view the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
online search instructions to locate
docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2013–0101.’’
II. Vehicles involved: Approximately
150 MY 2012 and 2013 Morgan model
M3W three-wheeled motorcycles
manufactured from August 1, 2012 to
August 14, 2013 (subject vehicles) are
affected.
III. Noncompliances: Morgan’s
petition concerns two requirements in
FMVSS No. 108.1 Both noncompliances
involve the vehicles’ headlights. Morgan
states that the noncompliances are a
result of a configuration error in its
production line. The first
noncompliance involves the spacing
between the headlights. Paragraph
S10.17.1.2.2 of FMVSS No. 108 specifies
SUMMARY:
1 49
PO 00000
CFR 571.108.
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21663
that if motorcycle headlamps are
horizontally disposed about the vertical
centerline, the distance between the
closest edges of their effective projected
luminous lens areas must not be greater
than 200 mm.2 Morgan states in its
petition that the subject motorcycles do
not comply with this requirement
because they are equipped with dual
horizontally-mounted headlamps
mounted 29 inches (737 mm) apart (lens
edge to lens edge).
The second noncompliance concerns
the lack of a required marking on the
headlamps. Paragraph S6.5.1 of FMVSS
No. 108 requires that the lens of each
original equipment and replacement
headlamp be marked with the symbol
‘‘DOT,’’ either horizontally or vertically,
to indicate certification under 49 U.S.C.
30115.3 Morgan states in its petition that
the subject vehicles do not include this
marking.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraphs S7.9.6.2(b)
and S10.17.1.2.2 of FMVSS No. 108
require in pertinent part:
Paragraph S7.9.6.2(b) (applies only to the
subject vehicles manufactured before
December 1, 2012).
If the system consists of two headlamps,
each of which provides both an upper and
lower beam, the headlamps shall be mounted
either at the same height and symmetrically
disposed about the vertical centerline or
mounted on the vertical centerline. If the
headlamps are horizontally disposed about
the vertical centerline, the distance between
the closest edges of their effective projected
luminous lens areas shall not be greater than
200 mm (8 in.).
Paragraph S10.17.1.2.2 (applies only to the
subject vehicles manufactured after
December 1, 2012).
If the headlamps are horizontally disposed
about the vertical centerline, the distance
between the closest edges of their effective
projected luminous lens areas must not be
greater than 200 mm.
V. Summary of Morgan’s Petition and
Comments: Morgan petitions for relief
from the recall provisions of the Vehicle
Safety Act with respect to both of these
noncompliances. Morgan makes several
arguments to support its assertion that
these noncompliances are
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
With respect to the headlamp spacing
noncompliance, Morgan contends that
2 In a December 2007 final rule, NHTSA rewrote
and reorganized FMVSS No. 108 to provide a more
straightforward and logical presentation of the
regulatory requirements. 72 FR 68234, Dec. 4, 2007.
Those amendments became effective on December
1, 2012. 74 FR 58214, Nov. 12, 2009. The rewrite
was not intended to make any substantive changes
to the standard. The subject vehicle population
includes vehicles manufactured both before and
after this effective date. Prior to the effective date
of the reorganized standard, the headlight spacing
requirement was contained in S7.9.6.2(b).
3 This provision was located at S7.2(a) in the prerewrite version of FMVSS No. 108.
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21662-21663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08362]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0098; Notice 2]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC (CTA), has determined that
certain Continental Tire brand T-type spare tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S4.3(a) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 109, New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires. CTA has filed a
report dated August 25, 2015 and amended on October 1, 2015, pursuant
to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Abraham
Diaz, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5310, facsimile
(202) 366-5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d)
and 30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted
a petition for an exemption from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was published with a 30-day
public comment period, on October 29, 2015 in the Federal Register (80
FR 66613). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2015-0098.''
II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 3,627 Continental
Tire brand CST 17 size T125/70R17 98M temporary spare tires sold to
General Motors and also in small quantities in the replacement market.
These tires were manufactured between March 18, 2012 and April 11,
2015.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains that the noncompliance is that the
tire size designation markings on the sidewalls of the subject tires do
not contain the tire type code designator symbol from The Tire and Rim
Association yearbook as required by paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109.
Specifically, the subject tire size reads ``125/70R17 98M'' but should
read ``T125/70R17 98M'' indicating the tire is a spare tire and for
temporary use.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109 requires in
pertinent part:
S4.3 Labeling Requirements. Except as provided in S4.3.1 and
S4.3.2 of this standard, each tire, except for those certified to
comply with S5.5 of Sec. 571.139, shall have permanently molded
into or onto both sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less than
0.078 inches high, the information shown in paragraphs S4.3(a)
through (g) of this standard. On at least one sidewall, the
information shall be positioned in an area between the maximum
section width and bead of the tire, unless the maximum section width
of the tire falls between the bead and one-fourth of the distance
from the bead to the shoulder of the tire. . . .
(a) One size designation, except that equivalent inch and metric
size designations may be used; . . .
V. Summary of CTA's Analyses: CTA stated that the only missing
marking on the sidewalls of the affected tires is the letter ``T'' as
part of the size designation.
CTA also stated its belief that the omission of the tire size
designation markings has no impact on the operational performance or
durability of these tires or on the safety of vehicles on which these
tires may be mounted and that the affected tires cannot be confused
with normal P-metric or metric passenger tires for the following
reasons:
1. Both sidewalls of the affected tires have permanently molded
letters that are \1/2\ inch tall with the words ``TEMPORARY USE ONLY.''
2. Both sidewalls of the affected tires have permanently molded
letters and numerals that are \1/2\ inch tall with the words ``INFLATE
TO 420KPA (60PSI),'' as required by section S4.3.5 of FMVSS No. 109.
3. The affected tires are intended as spare tires for the Chevy
Impala, which is equipped with four ground tires of size P235[/]55R17
98W. The ground tires are significantly different in width
(approximately four inches wider) and in diameter (approximately three
inches larger) than the subject spare tires.
4. The affected tires also have a starting tread depth of only 3/32
inch, whereas a typical P-metric or metric passenger tire has a much
deeper tread depth of approximately 10/32 inch.
CTA also noted that they are not aware of any crashes, injuries,
customer complaints or field reports associated with this
noncompliance.
In addition, CTA informed NHTSA that it has corrected the mold at
the manufacturing plant so that no additional tires will be
manufactured with the subject noncompliance and that all remaining CTA
inventory of the subject tires in their possession have been scrapped.
CTA also made reference to inconsequential noncompliance petitions
that NHTSA previously granted concerning noncompliances that CTA
believes are similar to the subject noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA's Decision
NHTSA's Analysis: Labeling the tire size ``125/70R17'' instead of
``T125/70R17,'' violates paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109 because the
tire is labeled with an incomplete tire size designation for temporary
use tires, also referred to as spare tires.
NHTSA bases its decision on several points. First, CTS labeled the
subject tires on both sidewalls with the words ``TEMPORARY USE ONLY''
and ``INFLATE TO 420KPA (60PSI).'' The maximum pressure labeled on the
subject tires correlates with the pressure specified for all temporary
use tires in the TRA's tire publication. Together, these additional
labels provide the user with the same information intended by the
missing labels, and by spelling out the word TEMPORARY, provides that
information in clear format. All other sidewall labels and safety
information are correct.
Next, NHTSA agrees that the subject tires would not be confused
with non-temporary tires used on vehicles for which the tires are
intended because of the differences in geometry of the two types of
tires. CTA indicated that the subject tires are approximately four
[[Page 21663]]
inches narrower and three inches smaller in diameter than the non-
temporary tires that would be used on the vehicle for which the subject
tires are also intended.
Finally, neither CTA nor NHTSA are aware of any crashes, injuries,
customer complaints or field reports associated with the omitted
labeling.
NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds
that CTA has met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No.
109 noncompliance in the affected tires is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety. Accordingly, CTA's petition is hereby granted and CTA
is consequently exempted from the obligation of providing notification
of, and a free remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer controlled at the
time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve equipment distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-08362 Filed 4-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P