Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Determination of No Shipments, In Part: 2014 Administrative Review, 21319-21320 [2016-08233]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices
For purposes of this investigation, a
covered product is of ‘‘iron’’ where the article
has a carbon content of 1.7 percent by weight
or above, regardless of the presence and
amount of additional alloying elements.
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 8483.30.8090,
8483.50.6000, 8483.50.9040, 8483.50.9080,
8483.90.3000, 8483.90.8080. Covered
merchandise may also enter under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7326.19.0010,
7326.19.0080, 8431.31.0040, 8431.31.0060,
8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050, 8431.39.0070,
8431.39.0080, and 8483.50.4000. These
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–08235 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results and Final Determination of No
Shipments, In Part: 2014
Administrative Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the tenth
administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the
antidumping duty order on wooden
bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is
January 1, 2014, through December 31,
2014. The AR covers 18 PRC exporters
of subject merchandise, of which the
Department selected one company for
individual examination, Shanghai Jian
Pu Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai
Jian Pu’’). The Department invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received
comments from the American Furniture
Manufactures Committee for Legal
Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture
Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’). No other
party commented. After consideration of
Petitioners’ comments, our final results
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 80
FR 77321 (December 14, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
18:37 Apr 08, 2016
Background
For a complete description of the
events that followed the publication of
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum 2 which is
dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
Scope of the Order
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
remain unchanged from the Preliminary
Results.
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 238001
The product covered by the order is
wooden bedroom furniture, subject to
certain exceptions.3 Imports of subject
merchandise are classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings:
9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045,
9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9041,
9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018,
9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or
7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description in the Order
remains dispositive.4
Analysis of the Comments Received
The issues raised in Petitioners’ case
brief are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
issues addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is appended to
this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit of the main Department
2 See the memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014
Administrative Review’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’).
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4,
2005) (‘‘Order’’).
4 For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21319
building, room B8024. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department determined that seven
companies under review, including
Shanghai Jian Pu, the sole mandatory
respondent, did not establish their
eligibility for separate rate status and
would be treated as part of the PRCwide entity.5 We only received
comments on the Preliminary Results
from Petitioners, which agreed with our
preliminary separate rates
determination with respect to Shanghai
Jian Pu and did not comment on any
other entity under review. In these final
results of review, we continue to
determine that these seven companies
should be treated as part of the PRCwide entity because they have not
established their separate rate eligibility.
Because no party requested a review of
the PRC-wide entity, we are not
conducting a review of the PRC-wide
entity.6 Thus, there is no change to the
rate for the PRC-wide entity. The
existing rate for the PRC-wide entity is
216.01 percent.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that 11 companies subject to
this AR had no shipments during the
POR.7 We received no comments
5 See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The six
companies that did not establish their eligibility for
a separate rate, other than Shanghai Jian Pu, are: (1)
Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (2) Dongguan
Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture (China)
Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co.,
Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House
Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding
Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood
International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co.,
Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing)
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden
Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.
6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
7 The 11 companies with no shipments during the
POR are: (1) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan
Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Dongguan
Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Eurosa (Kunshan)
Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (5)
Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (6) Hangzhou
Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.; (7) Rizhao Sanmu
Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (8) Shenyang Shining
Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (9) Wuxi Yushea
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
Continued
11APN1
21320
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices
concerning our finding of no shipments
by these 11 companies. In these final
results of review, we continue to
determine that these 11 companies had
no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication date of these final results of
review. We intend to instruct CBP to
liquidate POR entries of subject
merchandise from the seven companies,
including Shanghai Jian Pu, which
failed to establish their eligibility for
separate rate status at the rate applicable
to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11
companies which the Department
determined had no shipments during
the POR, all suspended entries under
any of those companies’ antidumping
case numbers will be liquidated at the
assessment rate for the PRC-wide
entity.8
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date in the Federal Register of the final
results of review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters which are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but which have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the existing exporter-specific rate;
(2) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate,
including Shanghai Jian Pu and the six
companies noted above, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCwide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: April 1, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Shanghai Jian Pu
Import & Export Co. Ltd.
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–08233 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 am]
Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific &
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
8 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Apr 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE552
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has
made a preliminary determination that
an Exempted Fishing Permit application
submitted by The Nature Conservancy
contains all of the required information
and warrants further consideration. This
Exempted Fishing Permit would allow
participants to use electronic
monitoring systems in lieu of at-sea
monitors in support of a study to
develop electronic monitoring for the
purposes of catch monitoring in the
groundfish fishery.
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed Exempted
Fishing Permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line ‘‘TNC EM
EFP.’’
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope ‘‘TNC
EM EFP.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Alger, Groundfish Sector Policy
Analyst, 978–675–2153.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2010,
NMFS implemented Amendment 16 to
the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), which revised
and expanded the sector management
system and established annual catch
limits and accountability measures for
each stock in the fishery. In order to
reliably estimate sector catch and
monitor sector operations, Amendment
16 included new requirements for
groundfish sectors to implement and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21319-21320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results and Final Determination of No Shipments, In Part: 2014
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the tenth
administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden
bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC''), in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is
January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. The AR covers 18 PRC
exporters of subject merchandise, of which the Department selected one
company for individual examination, Shanghai Jian Pu Import & Export
Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai Jian Pu''). The Department invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received comments
from the American Furniture Manufactures Committee for Legal Trade and
Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. (``Petitioners''). No other
party commented. After consideration of Petitioners' comments, our
final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014, 80 FR 77321 (December 14, 2015) (``Preliminary
Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
For a complete description of the events that followed the
publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum \2\ which is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014
Administrative Review'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture,
subject to certain exceptions.\3\ Imports of subject merchandise are
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080,
9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or
7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in
the Order remains dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture
From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005)
(``Order'').
\4\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of the Comments Received
The issues raised in Petitioners' case brief are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System
(``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit of the main Department building, room B8024. In addition,
a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that seven
companies under review, including Shanghai Jian Pu, the sole mandatory
respondent, did not establish their eligibility for separate rate
status and would be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ We only
received comments on the Preliminary Results from Petitioners, which
agreed with our preliminary separate rates determination with respect
to Shanghai Jian Pu and did not comment on any other entity under
review. In these final results of review, we continue to determine that
these seven companies should be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity
because they have not established their separate rate eligibility.
Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, we are not
conducting a review of the PRC-wide entity.\6\ Thus, there is no change
to the rate for the PRC-wide entity. The existing rate for the PRC-wide
entity is 216.01 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The six companies
that did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate, other
than Shanghai Jian Pu, are: (1) Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai;
(2) Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (3) Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony
House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony
House Industries Co., Ltd.; (4) Orient International Holding
Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (5) Prime Wood International Co.,
Ltd, Prime Best International Co., Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang
Huang (Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd.; and (6) Woodworth Wooden
Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.
\6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November
4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that 11 companies subject
to this AR had no shipments during the POR.\7\ We received no comments
[[Page 21320]]
concerning our finding of no shipments by these 11 companies. In these
final results of review, we continue to determine that these 11
companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The 11 companies with no shipments during the POR are: (1)
Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.;
(3) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co.,
Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (5) Golden Well
International (HK) Ltd.; (6) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.; (7)
Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (8) Shenyang Shining Dongxing
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (9) Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh
Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific &
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP
15 days after the publication date of these final results of review. We
intend to instruct CBP to liquidate POR entries of subject merchandise
from the seven companies, including Shanghai Jian Pu, which failed to
establish their eligibility for separate rate status at the rate
applicable to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11 companies which the
Department determined had no shipments during the POR, all suspended
entries under any of those companies' antidumping case numbers will be
liquidated at the assessment rate for the PRC-wide entity.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal
Register of the final results of review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of
the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all
PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, including Shanghai Jian Pu and the six
companies noted above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the
PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3) for all non-PRC exporters
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
These final results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213.
Dated: April 1, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Shanghai Jian Pu Import & Export Co. Ltd.
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-08233 Filed 4-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P