Nucor Steel Connecticut Incorporated; Grant of a Permanent Variance, 20680-20688 [2016-08004]
Download as PDF
20680
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 4,
2016.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2016–08005 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2014–0022]
Nucor Steel Connecticut Incorporated;
Grant of a Permanent Variance
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In this notice, OSHA grants a
permanent variance to Nucor Steel
Connecticut Incorporated from the
provisions of OSHA standards that
regulate the control of hazardous energy
(lockout/tagout).
DATES: The permanent variance
specified by this notice, becomes
effective on April 8, 2016 and shall
remain in effect until it is modified or
revoked.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank
Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–3647, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–1999; email:
meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson, Director,
Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, Directorate of
Technical Support and Emergency
Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–3655, Washington, DC 20210;
phone: (202) 693–2110 or email:
robinson.kevin@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register
notice.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice are available at https://
www.regulations.gov. This Federal
Register notice, as well as news releases
and other relevant information, also are
available at OSHA’s Web page at https://
www.osha.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Notice of Application
On September 22, 2014, Nucor Steel
Connecticut Incorporated (hereafter,
‘‘NSCI’’ or ‘‘the applicant’’) 35 Toelles
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Road, Wallingford, CT 06492, submitted
under Section 6(d) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (‘‘OSH
Act’’; 29 U.S.C. 655) and 29 CFR
1905.11 (‘‘Variances and other relief
under section 6(d)’’) an application for
a permanent variance from several
provisions of the OSHA standard that
regulates the control of hazardous
energy (‘‘lockout/tagout’’ or ‘‘LOTO’’),
as well as a request for an interim order
pending OSHA’s decision on the
application for variance (Ex. OSHA–
2014–0022–0003) at its Wallingford, CT
facility. Specifically, NSCI was seeking
a variance from the provisions of the
standard that require: (1) Lockout or
tagout devices be affixed to each energy
isolating device by authorized
employees (29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i));
and (2) lockout devices, where used, be
affixed in a manner that holds the
energy isolating devices in a ‘‘safe’’ or
‘‘off’’ position (29 CFR
1910.147(d)(4)(ii)). Also, NSCI requested
an interim order pending OSHA’s
decision on the application for variance.
According to its application, NSCI
manufactures steel wire rod and coiled
rebar from billets of steel by using
rolling and forming processes. Further,
NSCI’s description of its operation
indicated that the hot steel billets are
shaped and formed into steel wire rod
and coiled rebar by running them
through a series of rolls. The rolls shape
and form the steel as it moves from one
stand to the next. Each roll has several
passes (or grooves), only one of which
is used at a time. The pass is designed
to shape the bar to a certain size as it
goes through the mill by compressing,
squeezing, and stretching the bar. Rolls
are designed with passes to bring a bar
down through roughing, intermediate
and finish mills to a finished size.
As with any shaping tool, the passes
wear during use and from time to time
need to be changed. As the pass wears,
the shape of the bar and the appearance
of the bar are affected. When new rolls
are brought into production, every pass
is prepared with a spray that provides
friction which allows the rolls to bite
the bar between the rolls. Once rolls are
in operation, roll grinding is regularly
required, because during the operation
of the mill stands water is used to cool
the rolls to prevent fracturing and
damage to the rolls. The water protects
the pass while in use, but it also creates
rust in the other passes. The rust can
affect the final quality of the bar being
processed, so steps are taken to remove
the rust prior to restarting the
operations. Rust is removed from the
passes using a common 4-inch hand
grinder. Since January 2012, the rolls
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
have been ground with the rolls stopped
and locked out.
NSCI asserted that grinding the rolls
requires access to the Motor Control
Room (MCR), in order to operate the
energy isolation disconnects for the roll
mills. Employees who perform the
particular task of grinding the passes are
exposed to potentially serious arc flash
hazards if they accessed the MCR in
order to perform energy isolation
functions. To control exposure to the arc
flash hazards, NSCI instituted safe work
rules that: (1) Designate the MCR as a
restricted entry work area; (2) restrict
MCR access to qualified electricians
only; and (3) prohibit employees who
perform pass grinding from entering the
MCR because they are not qualified
electrical employees trained in
recognition and mitigation of electrical
hazards. Further, NSCI asserted that as
a consequence of following these safe
work rules the employees performing
pass grinding cannot lockout the energy
isolation disconnects located in the
MCR or personally verify that a lockout
has been performed.
OSHA initiated a technical review of
NSCI’s variance application and
developed a set of follow-up questions
regarding the assertions of equivalent
worker protection included in the
application. On November 26, 2014,
OSHA sent NSCI a letter containing a
set of follow-up questions (Ex. OSHA–
2014–0022–0006). On December 19,
2014, NSCI provided its responses to the
follow-up questions (Ex. OSHA–2014–
0022–0007). Based on these responses to
the follow-up questions and the
alternate safety measures proposed in
NSCI’s application, on May 22, 2015,
the Agency sent NSCI a letter (Ex.
OSHA–2014–0022–0009) describing its
findings on the technical merits of the
application. OSHA’s letter also included
a set of proposed conditions for the
grant of an interim order and permanent
variance and a request for NSCI’s
comments on these proposed
conditions. On July 10, 2015, NSCI
provided its response (Ex. OSHA–2014–
0022–0010) indicating acceptance of the
proposed conditions and including a
few recommended changes. OSHA
carefully reviewed NSCI’s
recommended changes and incorporated
the majority of the changes into the
conditions of the variance.
Following this review, OSHA
determined that the applicant proposed
an alternative that provides a workplace
as safe and healthful as that provided by
the standard. On December 2, 2015,
OSHA published a preliminary Federal
Register announcing NSCI’s application
for a permanent variance and interim
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
order, grant of an interim order, and
request for comments (80 FR 75472).
The comment period closed on
January 4, 2016, and OSHA received
one comment (Ex. OSHA–2014–0022–
0012) from the Association for
Packaging and Processing Technologies
in support of granting NSCI the
variance.
II. The Variance Application
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Background
NSCI’s variance application and the
responses to OSHA’s follow-up
questions included the following:
Detailed descriptions of the
manufacturing process; the equipment
used; the proposed alternative to
lockout/tagout (LOTO) devices and
procedures implemented during
servicing and maintenance of specific
equipment (e.g., grinding of roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands);
and technical evidence supporting
NSCI’s assertions of equivalency of
worker protection.
According to the information
included in its application, performing
lockout on the roll mill stands requires
access to the MCR, an area restricted to
qualified electricians. Because NSCI
employees who perform the particular
task of grinding the passes are not
qualified electrical employees trained in
recognition and mitigation of electrical
hazards, they may not access the MCR.
Therefore, they cannot use the EID in
that location to isolate the hazardous
electrical energy or personally verify
that energy isolation has been achieved
if the EID is operated by a qualified
employee.
To address these issues, NSCI
developed an alternative method of
preventing the unexpected startup or
energization of the roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands. NSCI
proposes to use a comprehensive
engineered system and appropriate
administrative procedures to meet the
energy isolation requirements. The
engineered system uses a ‘‘trapped key’’
concept and monitored safety-rated
power relays in combination with
administrative procedures. The trapped
key system is designed to: Replace a
locked out energy isolating device; and
function similarly (to a lockout device),
in that only the employee in possession
of the key can restart the machine
undergoing maintenance. The single key
is controlled through administrative
group lockout procedures that NSCI
believes match the requirements of 29
CFR 1910.147.
Further, NSCI asserted that its
proposed trapped key energy control
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
system has been evaluated 1 for three
scenarios that could result in
unexpected energization of the rolls
including: (1) Intentional deenergization; (2) intentional reenergization; and (3) potential faults.
The system prevents unexpected startup
or energization in all three scenarios.
The applicant contended that the
alternative safety measures included in
its application provide its workers with
a place of employment that is at least as
safe and healthful as they would obtain
under the existing provisions of OSHA’s
control of hazardous energy (lockout/
tagout) standard. The applicant certified
that it provided employee
representatives with a copy of the
variance application. The applicant also
certified that it notified its workers of
the variance application by posting, at
prominent locations where it normally
posts workplace notices, a summary of
the application and information
specifying where the workers can
examine a copy of the application. In
addition, the applicant informed its
workers of their rights to petition the
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health for a
hearing on the variance application.
B. Variance From Paragraph (d)(4)(i)
and (d)(4)(ii) of 29 CFR 1910.147
As an alternative means of
compliance to the requirements of
1910.147(d)(4(i) and (ii), NSCI proposed
to use a comprehensive engineered
system and appropriate administrative
procedures to meet these requirements.
The engineered system uses a ‘‘trapped
key’’ concept and monitored safetyrated power relays in combination with
administrative procedures. The trapped
key system is designed to: Replace a
locked out energy isolating device; and
function similarly (to a lockout device),
in that only the employee in possession
of the key can restart the machine
undergoing maintenance. The single key
is controlled through administrative
group lockout procedures identical to
those required by 29 CFR 1910.147.
Although the trapped key prevents
normal intended startup of the
1 NSCI provided documentation that TUV
Rheinland, an independent third-party testing
laboratory reviewed and certified that the trapped
key interlock system is a suitable component for use
in safety category 2, 3, and 4 safety systems as
specified in International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) and International Organization
for Standardization (ISO) machinery standards.
Further, NSCI asserted that several independent
experts (including Dr. James Barrett, Mr. Ed Grund,
Mr. Bruce Main, and Mr. Alan Metelsky) skilled in
the evaluation of electrical circuitry, guarding, and
the control of hazardous energy evaluated the
circuitry of the trapped key system and found that
it was appropriately designed and installed for this
application.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20681
equipment being serviced, it is not being
used on an EID, as required by OSHA’s
standards. To meet this requirement,
NSCI proposed to use a monitored
safety-relay system that uses approved
components, redundant systems, and
control-reliable circuitry. Use of the
trapped key system in combination with
detailed administrative energy control
policies and procedures, as well as
providing effective training allows
NSCI’s authorized and affected
employees to complete the required
grinding of its stationary rolls in a
manner that provides equivalency in
energy isolation to compliance with the
applicable provisions of the LOTO
standard. The trapped key system is
based on use of an Allen Bradley
GuardMaster safety-rated relay, which is
specifically designed for safety
applications. However, the use of the
Allen Bradley GuardMaster safety-rated
relay does not meet the LOTO
standard’s definition of EID because this
relay is a form of control circuitry.
The applicant maintains that use of
the trapped key system provides
equivalent safety with what can be
achieved by strict compliance with the
1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) requirements.
According to NSCI’s variance
application, equivalent safety is
achieved by prohibiting roll movement
during de-energization while grinding is
being performed, as well as prohibiting
mistaken intentional re-energization and
re-energization due to fault conditions,
without exposing employees to hazards
within the MCR. To protect against
system faults causing re-energization,
the trapped key system meets the
requirements for control reliability as
stated in ANSI B11.19 (2010)
Performance of Safeguarding, in that no
single fault results in the loss of the
safety function. In addition, the system
includes system fault monitoring,
tamper resistance, and exclusive
employee control over lockout devices.
Further, the applicant asserted that
the trapped key system uses well tried
components, which is a key factor in the
reliability of a control system. The
system is based on an Allen Bradley
GuardMaster safety-rated relay which is
specifically designed for safety
applications. The trapped key is a
specially manufactured unique key that
is only available from the manufacturer
at a significant cost, and cannot be
otherwise duplicated.
C. Technical Review
OSHA conducted a review of NSCI’s
application and the supporting
technical documentation. After
completing the review of the application
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20682
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
and supporting documentation, OSHA
concluded that NSCI:
1. Modified the electrical controls at
the pulpit (central control station
located on the roll mill floor for the 15
roll mill stands), to prevent employee
exposure to hazards associated with
movement of the roll mill while
performing the task of grinding roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands;
2. Installed a trapped key control
system and implemented administrative
energy control procedures that prevent
employee exposure to hazards
associated with energy while grinding
on the roll mill passes;
3. Utilizing qualified engineering
safety experts, performed a job hazard
analysis for roll grinding associated
tasks, conducted and documented an
electrical isolation analysis, system and
functional safety reviews, and control
reliability analysis to verify that the use
of the trapped key system and
administrative energy control
procedures prevent the movement of
roll mill passes; prevent mistaken or
intentional re-energization; and
maintain immobility in the event of
fault conditions;
4. Developed a two-tiered system of
securing the trapped key as follows:
a. Stopping the operation and
energization of the roll mill passes by
removing the trapped key from the
system, and securing the key within a
lock box inside the pulpit area (central
control station located on the roll mill
floor for the 15 roll mill stands); and
b. Locking the key to the lock box in
the pulpit area inside a secondary group
lock box installed on the roll mill floor,
with each employee performing roll mill
grinding applying their personal lock to
the lock box;
5. Developed detailed administrative
energy control procedures for use of the
trapped key system;
6. Implemented detailed
administrative energy control
procedures designed to ensure that each
authorized employee applies a personal
lock to the secondary group lock box;
7. Procured and provided appropriate
equipment and supplies;
8. Made the administrative energy
control policies and procedures
available in English and Spanish;
9. Trained authorized and affected
employees on the application of the
trapped key system and associated
administrative energy control policies
and procedures;
10. Ensured that grinding on the
passes is conducted only while using
the administrative energy control
procedures based on the trapped key
system;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
11. Installed guarding on the entry/
infeed and exit/outfeed sides of each
roll mill stand to prevent employees
from standing between turning mills
and being exposed to the crushing
hazards of in-running nip points;
12. Developed additional
administrative controls and procedures
to minimize the potential for authorized
and affected employees to enter between
the mill stands when harm could occur;
and
13. Designated and posted the areas as
‘‘No Entry’’ unless the procedures (1–12
above) are followed.
III. Description of the Conditions
Specified for the Permanent Variance
As previously indicated in this notice,
OSHA conducted a review of NSCI’s
application and the supporting
technical documentation. After
completing the review of the application
and supporting documentation, OSHA
determined that NSCI developed, and
proposed to implement, effective
alternative means of protection that
protect its employees as effectively as
paragraphs 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of
OSHA’s LOTO standard during the
servicing and maintenance task of
grinding roll mill passes located in the
roll mill stands. Therefore, on December
2, 2015, OSHA published a preliminary
Federal Register announcing NSCI’s
application for a permanent variance
and interim order, grant of an interim
order, and request for comments (80 FR
75472). The comment period closed on
January 4, 2016, and OSHA received
one comment (Ex. OSHA–2014–0022–
0012) from the Association for
Packaging and Processing Technologies
in support of granting NSCI the
variance.
During the period starting with the
December 2, 2015, publication of the
preliminary Federal Register notice
announcing grant of the interim order
(80 FR 75472), until the Agency
modifies or revokes the interim order or
makes a decision on its application for
a permanent variance, the applicant was
required to comply fully with the
conditions of the interim order as an
alternative to complying with the
requirements of 29 CFR
1910.147(d)(4)(i) and 1910.147(d)(4)(ii).
With the publication of this notice,
OSHA is revoking the interim order
granted to the employer on December 2,
2015 (80 FR 75472).
This section describes the conditions
that comprise the alternative means of
compliance with 29 CFR
1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (d)(4)(ii). Also,
these conditions provide additional
detail regarding the conditions that form
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the basis of the permanent variance
OSHA is granting to NSCI.
Condition A: Scope
The scope of the permanent variance
limits coverage of the conditions of the
permanent variance to the work
situations specified under this
condition. Clearly defining the scope of
the permanent variance provides NSCI,
NSCI’s employees, other stakeholders,
the public, and OSHA with necessary
information regarding the work
situations in which the permanent
variance applies and does not apply. For
example, condition A limits coverage of
the permanent variance only to the task
of grinding roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands. The condition
clarifies that no other maintenance
work, including electrical maintenance,
can be performed on the roll mill
passes, the roll mill motors, other
residual or stored energy sources, or
electric circuits connected to the
trapped key system or roll mill stands
using the trapped key system to control
hazardous energy.
According to 29 CFR 1905.11, an
employer or class or group of
employers 2 may request a permanent
variance for a specific workplace or
workplaces. If granted, the variance
applies only to the specific employer(s)
that submitted the application. In this
instance, the permanent variance
applies to NSCI at its Wallingford, CT
plant only. As a result, it is important
to understand that permanent variance
does not apply to any other employers
or NSCI plant locations.
Condition B: Definitions
Condition B defines a series of terms,
mostly technical terms, used in the
permanent variance to standardize and
clarify their meaning. Defining these
terms serves to enhance the applicant’s
and its employees’ understanding of the
conditions specified by the permanent
variance.
Condition C: Safety and Health
Practices
Condition C requires the applicant to:
(1) Modify certain controls at the pulpit
by installing and operating a trapped
key system designed to replace an
energy isolating device; (2) develop and
implement certain trapped key systemrelated alternate energy control policies
and procedures; and (3) develop and
implement a series of trapped key
2 A class or group of employers (such as members
of a trade alliance or association) may apply jointly
for a variance provided an authorized
representative for each employer signs the
application and the application identifies each
employer’s affected facilities.
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
system-related hazard prevention and
control requirements and methods
designed to ensure the continued
effective functioning of the alternate
energy control equipment, policies, and
procedures. Examples of such hazard
control measures include, but are not
limited to: (1) Conducting grinding on
the passes only after using the steps
required to properly de-energize the
system; (2) under the direction of a
qualified person,3 ensuring that the
trapped key system is installed,
inspected, serviced, maintained, used,
and when appropriate modified in
accordance with good engineering
practices, and/or in strict accordance
with the manufacturers’ specifications
and instructions, where available; and
(3) no other maintenance can be
performed on the roll mill stands while
grinding is taking place.
Condition D: Steps Required To DeEnergize the System
Condition D requires the applicant to
develop and implement a detailed
procedure for de-energizing the roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands in
order to perform the grinding task. The
procedure for de-energizing the roll mill
passes includes a series of steps to
ensure that all authorized and effected
employees are notified that: The roll
mill passes are effectively de-energized;
the task of grinding the roll mill passes
is ready to begin; and no other servicing
or maintenance is to be performed on
the roll mill stands while grinding is
taking place.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Condition E: Steps Required To Start
Motion Intentionally
Condition E requires the applicant to
develop and implement a detailed
procedure for re-energizing and
intentionally starting motion in the roll
mill passes located in the roll mill
stands in order to resume normal
operations at the conclusion of the
grinding task. The procedure for reenergizing the roll mill passes includes
a series of steps to ensure that all
authorized and effected employees are
notified that the task of grinding the roll
mill passes is complete and that the roll
mill passes are ready for use.
Condition F: Training and Methods of
Operation
Condition F requires the applicant to
develop and implement an effective
hazardous energy control qualification
and training program for authorized
employees involved in using the
trapped key system while grinding roll
mill passes. The condition specifies the
3 See
footnote 9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
factors that an employee must know
following completion of the training
program. Elements to be included in the
training program encompass, among
others: The program to be presented in
language that the employees can
understand; the instruction be reviewed
periodically to accommodate changes in
the energy control program; the contents
and conditions included in the variance;
the preparation of a job hazard analysis
(JHA) describing the application of the
trapped key system, the identification of
associated hazards and safe use of the
associated energy control procedures;
and instruction regarding the safe use of
the associated energy control
procedures. Additionally, condition F
also requires the applicant to train each
affected employee in the purpose and
use of the alternative energy control
procedures using the trapped key
system.
Condition G: Inspections, Tests, and
Accident Prevention
Condition G requires the applicant to
develop, implement and operate an
effective program for completing
inspections, tests, program evaluations,
and accident prevention measures for
the use of the trapped key system and
safe application of the hazardous energy
control procedures in the roll mill
stands and associated work areas. This
condition serves to ensure the safe
operation and physical integrity of the
equipment and work area. Use of the
trapped key system while conducting
roll mill grinding operations enhances
worker safety by reducing the risk of
unexpected energization of the
equipment.
This condition also requires the
applicant to document tests,
inspections, corrective actions and
repairs involving the use of the trapped
key system, and maintain these
documents. Further, this requirement
provides the applicant with information
needed to schedule tests and
inspections to ensure the continued safe
operation of the equipment and systems,
and to determine that the actions taken
to correct defects are appropriate.
Condition H: Recordkeeping
Condition H requires the applicant to
maintain records of specific factors
associated with use of the trapped key
system implemented to prevent the
unexpected energization of the
equipment while grinding roll mill
passes. The information gathered and
recorded under this provision, in
concert with the information provided
under condition I (Notifications, for
using the OSHA 301 Incident Report
form to investigate and record energy
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20683
isolation failure-related injuries as
defined by 29 CFR 1904.4, 1904.7,
1904.8 through 1904.12), enables the
applicant and OSHA to determine the
effectiveness of the permanent variance
in preventing recordable injuries.4
Condition I: Notifications
Condition I requires the applicant,
within specified periods to: (1) Notify
OSHA (i.e., Office of Technical
Programs and Coordination Activities
(OTPCA), and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office) of any recordable injuries,
illnesses, fatalities, work-related inpatient hospitalizations, amputations
and all losses of an eye (as defined by
29 CFR 1904.4, and 1904.7 through
1904.12) that occur as a result of
complying with the alternative energy
control conditions of the variance (e.g.,
as a result of performing roll mill pass
grinding operations) within 8 hours of
the incident (or becoming aware of the
incident); (2) provide OSHA (i.e.,
OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office) with a copy of the preliminary
incident investigation report (using
OSHA 301 form) within 24 hours of the
incident (or becoming aware of the
incident); (3) provide OSHA (i.e.,
OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office) with a copy of the full incident
investigation within 7 calendar days of
the incident (or becoming aware of the
incident); (4) include on the 301 form
information on the energy isolation
procedures and conditions associated
with the recordable injury or illness, the
root-cause determination, and
preventive and corrective actions
identified and implemented; (5) provide
its certification that it informed affected
workers of the incident and the results
of the incident investigation; (6) notify
OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office within 15 working days should
the applicant need to revise its energy
isolation procedures to accommodate
changes in the application of its trapped
key system that affect its ability to
comply with the conditions of the
permanent variance; and (7) provide
OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office, by January 31st at the beginning
of each calendar year, with a report
covering the year just ended, evaluating
the effectiveness of the alternate energy
isolation program.
4 See 29 CFR 1904 Recording and Reporting
Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (https://
www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_
document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9631);
recordkeeping forms and instructions (https://
www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/RKform300pkgfillable-enabled.pdf); and Updates to OSHA’s
Recordkeeping Rule (https://www.osha.gov/
recordkeeping2014/).
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20684
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
This condition for completing and
submitting the variance conditionsrelated (recordable) preliminary
incident investigation report (OSHA 301
form) is more restrictive than the
current recordkeeping requirement of
completing the OSHA 301 form within
7 calendar days of the incident
(1904.29(b)(3)). Submittal of the
preliminary incident investigation
report is to be followed by submittal of
the full incident investigation report
within 7 calendar days. This modified
and more stringent incident
investigation and reporting requirement
is restricted to variance conditionsrelated (recordable) incidents only.
Providing this notification is essential
because time is a critical element in
OSHA’s ability to determine the
continued effectiveness of the variance
conditions in preventing recordable
incidents as well as the employer’s
identification of appropriate hazard
control measures and implementation of
corrective and preventive actions.
Further, these notification requirements
enable the applicant, its employees, and
OSHA to determine the effectiveness of
the permanent variance in providing the
requisite level of safety to the
employer’s workers and, based on this
determination, whether to revise or
revoke the conditions of the permanent
variance. Timely notification permits
OSHA to take whatever action is
necessary and appropriate to prevent
further variance conditions-related
recordable injuries and illnesses.
Providing notification to employees
informs them of the precautions taken
by the employer to prevent similar
incidents in the future. Additionally,
these notification requirements allow
OSHA to: Communicate effectively,
expedite administration, and enforce the
conditions of the permanent variance.
Additionally, this condition requires
the applicant to notify OSHA if it ceases
to do business, has a new address or
location for its main office, or transfers
the operations covered by the
permanent variance to a successor
company. In addition, the condition
specifies that OSHA must approve the
transfer of the permanent variance to a
successor company. These requirements
allow OSHA to communicate effectively
with the applicant regarding the status
of the permanent variance, and expedite
the Agency’s administration and
enforcement. Stipulating that an
applicant is required to have OSHA’s
approval to transfer a variance to a
successor company provides assurance
that the successor company has
knowledge of, and will comply with, the
conditions specified by the permanent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
variance. Also, seeking OSHA’s
approval to transfer a variance to a
successor company serves to further
ensure the safety of workers involved in
performing the operations covered by
the variance.
IV. Decision
As described earlier in this notice,
after reviewing the proposed
alternatives OSHA determined that
NSCI developed, and proposed to
implement, effective alternative means
of protection that protect its employees
as effectively as paragraphs
1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of OSHA’s
LOTO standard during the servicing and
maintenance task of grinding roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands.
Further, under section 6(d) of the
Occupational safety and Health Act of
1970 (29 U.S.C. 655(d)), and based on
the record discussed above, the Agency
finds that when the employer complies
with the conditions of the variance, the
working conditions of the employers’
workers are at least as safe and healthful
as if the employers complied with the
working conditions specified by
paragraph 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of
OSHA’s LOTO standard. Therefore,
under the terms of this variance NSCI
must: (1) Comply with the conditions
listed below under section V of this
notice (‘‘Order’’) for the period between
the date of this notice and until the
Agency modifies or revokes this final
order in accordance with 29 CFR
1905.13; (2) comply fully with all other
applicable provisions of 29 CFR part
1910; and (3) provide a copy of this
Federal Register notice to all employees
affected by the conditions using the
same means it used to inform these
employees of its application for a
permanent variance.
V. Order
As of the effective date of this final
order, OSHA is revoking the interim
order granted to the employer on
December 2, 2015 (80 FR 75472).
OSHA issues this final order
authorizing Nucor Steel Connecticut
Incorporated (‘‘NSCI’’ or ‘‘the
applicant’’) to comply with the
following conditions instead of
complying with the requirements of
paragraphs 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and
(ii) of OSHA’s LOTO standard during
the servicing and maintenance task of
grinding roll mill passes located in the
roll mill stands. This final order applies
to all NSCI employees located at the 35
Toelles Road, Wallingford, CT 06492
establishment during the servicing and
maintenance task of grinding roll mill
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
passes located in the roll mill stands.
These conditions are: 5
A. Scope
1. This permanent variance applies
only to the task of grinding roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands of
NSCI’s Wallingford, CT establishment.
This work is to be performed by
authorized employees under alternative
energy control procedures using a
trapped key system and lock boxes.
2. No other maintenance work,
including electrical maintenance (such
as troubleshooting or maintenance
covered under 29 CFR 1910.333), may
be performed on the roll mill passes, the
roll mill motors, or electric circuits
connected to the trapped key system or
roll mill stands using the trapped key
system to control hazardous energy.
3. If any other maintenance or
servicing work is performed, even if that
work is performed at the same time as
grinding roll mill passes, all of the
maintenance work at that time must be
performed under full lockout as
required by 29 CFR 1910.147.
4. Except for the requirements
specified by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i)
and (ii), NSCI must comply fully with
all other applicable provisions of 29
CFR 1910.147 during servicing and
maintenance of roll mills during the
task of grinding roll mill passes.
5. The interim order granted to the
employer on December 2, 2015 (80 FR
75472) is hereby revoked.
B. Definitions
The following definitions apply to
this permanent variance:
1. Affected employee—an employee
whose job requires him/her to work in
an area in which grinding of roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands is
being performed.
2. Authorized employee—an
employee who uses the trapped key
system in order to perform grinding of
roll mill passes located in the roll mill
stands. An affected employee becomes
an authorized employee when that
employee’s duties include performing
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands covered under this
section.
3. Competent person—an employee
who is capable of identifying existing
and predictable hazards in the
surroundings associated with grinding
of roll mill passes located in the roll
mill stands or working conditions that
are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous
to employees, and who has
5 See
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
footnote 2.
08APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
authorization to take prompt corrective
measures to eliminate them.6
4. Equipment lock box—a part of the
trapped key system consisting of any
group lock box designated for and
mounted on or near equipment used for
securing the equipment lock box key by
use of a personal lockout device.
5. Equipment lock box lock and key—
a part of the trapped key system
consisting of a uniquely identified
equipment specific lock (red) and key
used to secure the pulpit designated
lock box containing and securing the
trapped key.
6. Group lock box—a purchased lock
box labeled as ‘‘TRAPPED KEY
SYSTEM’’ that is used to enable more
than one lock to be applied to the box.
There are two types of lock boxes used
in association with the trapped key
system (see definitions for pulpit
designated lock box and secondary
group lock box).
7. Job Hazard Analysis/Job Safety
Analysis—an evaluation of tasks or
operations to identify potential hazards
and to determine the necessary controls.
8. Personal lock and key—a durable,
standardized substantial and uniquely
identified device (a lock) that is
maintained and controlled by a single
authorized employee whose name is
attached to the device. The key is
unique to this device and is equally
maintained and controlled by the
authorized employee 7 whose name is
attached to the device. The personal
lock and key is used to secure the
equipment lock box key in the
secondary group lock box.
9. Pulpit designated lock box—a
group lock box mounted inside the
pulpit designated for use with the
‘‘TRAPPED KEY SYSTEM’’ and
including the: (a) Trapped key; (b)
equipment lock box lock and key; and
(c) pulpit operator personal lock and
key placed on the pulpit designated lock
box to secure the trapped key.
10. Pulpit operator—an authorized
employee who: (a) Is designated to work
on a roll mill crew; (b) is authorized to
use the trapped key system during the
grinding of roll mill passes; and (c) is
trained to operate the pulpit panel. The
pulpit panel has the ability to control
the following equipment systems:
Reheat furnace, discharge roll line,
turntable, roll mill stands A & B; roll
mill stands 1–15; water system;
finishing mill; laying head; and stelmore
conveyor.
6 Adapted
from 29 CFR 1926.32(f).
29 CFR part 1910 [Docket No. S–012A], RIN
1218–AA53. Control of Hazardous Energy Sources
(Lockout/Tagout), regarding ‘‘one person, one lock,
one key.’’
7 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
11. Pulpit operator trapped key
system personal lock and key—a part of
the trapped key system consisting of a
uniquely identified lock (green) and key
used by the pulpit operator to secure the
pulpit designated lock box containing
and securing the trapped key.
12. Qualified person—an employee
who, by possession of a recognized
degree, certificate, or professional
standing, or who, by extensive
knowledge, training, and experience,
successfully demonstrates an ability to
solve or resolve problems relating to the
subject matter, the work, or the project.8
13. Roll mill operator and/or lead—an
authorized employee who is designated
and trained to operate specific and
multiple equipment systems or perform
a specific job task that is part of the
rolling process, including application of
the trapped key system for the grinding
of roll mill passes.
14. Secondary group lock box—a
group lock box located on the mill floor
just below the pulpit where authorized
employees apply personal locks and
follow trapped key system alternative
energy isolation procedures to secure
the equipment lock box key.
15. Safety-rated relay—a device
specifically designed for safety
applications that meets the
requirements for control reliability as
stated in ANSI B11.19 (2010)
Performance of Safeguarding. The term
‘‘control reliable’’ means that no single
fault results in the loss of the safety
function. In addition, the relay must
include monitoring and tamper
resistance.
16. Team member—an employee who
is trained and authorized to use the
trapped key system in order to perform
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands.
17. Trapped key—a specially
manufactured unique key only available
from its manufacturer that is inserted
into the trapped key system’s rotary
switch. The rotary switch trapped key is
mechanically attached by a chain to the
pulpit designated lock box.
18. Trapped key system—the
alternative method of preventing the
unexpected startup or energization
during grinding of roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands. NSCI
presented the trapped key system to
OSHA in its variance application of
September 22, 2014, as supplemented
by its responses to OSHA’s questions
during the Agency’s application review.
The system is based on an Allen Bradley
GuardMaster safety-rated relay which is
specifically designed for safety
applications and use of a trapped key
8 Adapted
PO 00000
from 29 CFR 1926.32(m).
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20685
that is a specially manufactured unique
key only available from its
manufacturer, and the administrative
controls described in this variance.
C. Safety and Health Practices
1. NSCI shall modify the electrical
controls at the pulpit (central control
station located on the roll mill floor for
the 15 roll mill stands), to prevent
employee exposure to hazards
associated with movement of the roll
mill during the task of grinding roll mill
passes;
2. NSCI shall install a trapped key
system;
3. NSCI shall install a pulpit
designated lock box for the trapped key
in the pulpit area;
4. NSCI shall install a secondary
group lock box in the roll mills floor
area for securing the pulpit designated
lock box key;
5. NSCI shall develop administrative
energy control procedures for use of the
trapped key system as described below;
6. NSCI shall implement detailed
energy control procedures designed to
ensure that each authorized employee
applies a personal lock to the secondary
group lock box, and has the ability to
personally verify de-energization of the
system, as described below;
7. NSCI shall make the energy control
policies and procedures available to
authorized and affected employees in
English and Spanish;
8. NSCI shall ensure that grinding on
the passes is conducted only while
using the administrative energy control
procedures based on the trapped key
system, or using full lockout procedures
that comply with 29 CFR 1910.147
when the roll stands must be deenergized so that other maintenance
operations can be performed
simultaneously with roll grinding;
9. NSCI shall install guarding on the
entry/infeed and exit/outfeed sides of
each roll mill stand to prevent
employees from standing between
turning mills and being exposed to the
crushing hazards of in-running nip
points;
10. NSCI shall develop additional
administrative controls and procedures
to minimize the potential for authorized
and affected employees to enter between
the mill stands when harm could occur;
and
11. NSCI shall designate and post the
areas as ‘‘No Entry’’ unless the
procedures (1–10) are followed.
12. NSCI shall ensure that the trapped
key system and its components are
properly installed, inspected,
maintained, and used so that it works as
designed. NSCI shall strictly follow,
where applicable, manufacturers’
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
20686
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
recommendations for the installation,
inspection, maintenance, and use of the
system and its components.
13. NSCI shall ensure that the trapped
key system is only altered or modified
for uses specified and approved by a
qualified person by following good
engineering practices. Where available,
such alterations and modifications shall
strictly follow the manufacturers’
specifications, instructions, and written
authorization. No changes or
modifications may be made to the
trapped key system or its components
that diminish the protection provided to
affected employees.
14. NSCI shall ensure that alteration
or modification of the trapped key
system is fully justified and
documented when the manufacturers’
specifications, instructions, and written
authorization are lacking.
15. NCSI shall implement a procedure
to ensure that no other maintenance will
be performed on the roll mill stands
while grinding is taking place, unless
full lockout is used for all maintenance
tasks being performed at that time.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
D. Steps Required To De-Energize the
System
NSCI shall develop and implement a
detailed procedure for de-energizing the
roll mill passes located in the roll mill
stands in order to perform the grinding
task. The procedure for de-energizing
the roll mill passes shall include the
following steps:
1. The authorized employee deenergizing the roll mill passes shall
notify all affected employees that the
equipment will be shut down and
locked out to perform grinding of the
passes;
2. The pulpit operator shall turn off
the control leveler on the control panel;
3. The pulpit operator shall activate
the E-stop;
4. The pulpit operator verifies that the
red ‘‘system functional’’ indicator is
illuminated, then turns the trapped
lockout key 90ßto OFF position, and
removes the trapped key from the panel.
The operator verifies that the green
‘‘safe to work indicator’’ illuminates,
and that the red ‘‘system functional’’
indicator goes out;
5. The pulpit operator:
a. Places the trapped key in the pulpit
designated lock box and applies his or
her personal lock to the pulpit
designated lock box; and
b. Applies the equipment lock box
lock designated for this energy control
procedure;
6. The pulpit operator hands the
equipment lock box lock key to the roll
mill operator and/or lead;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
7. The roll mill operator and/or lead
takes the equipment lock box lock key
to the secondary group lock box;
8. The roll mill operator and/or lead
places the equipment lock box lock key
in the secondary group lock box and
attaches his or her personal lock;
9. Authorized employees (team
members) place their personal locks on
the secondary group lock box;
10. The roll mill operator and/or lead
verifies that the equipment is deenergized and locked out by trying to
operate the equipment (using the start
button);
11. The roll mill operator and/or lead
ensures that there are no additional
sources of energy that could lead to the
unexpected energization of the roll mill
passes;
12. Authorized employees who placed
their personal trapped key system locks
on the secondary group lockout box
shall also confirm that the equipment is
fully de-energized;
13. Authorized employees who placed
their personal locks on the secondary
group lock box shall maintain their
personal key in their possession while
performing grinding of the roll mill
passes; and
14. Authorized employees shall
perform the task of grinding the passes
only while these procedures are used.
E. Steps Required To Start Motion
Intentionally
NSCI shall develop and implement a
detailed procedure for re-energizing and
intentionally starting motion in the roll
mill passes located in the roll mill
stands in order to resume normal
operations at the conclusion of the
grinding task. The procedure for reenergizing the roll mill passes shall
include the following steps:
1. The roll mill operator and/or lead
shall check the equipment and the
immediate area around the equipment
to ensure that necessary items have been
removed and that the equipment
components are operationally intact;
2. The roll mill operator and/or lead
shall check the work area to ensure that
all affected employees have been safely
positioned or removed from the area;
3. The roll mill operator and/or lead
shall check that all controls are in the
neutral or off position;
4. Authorized employees shall remove
their personal trapped key system locks
from the secondary group lock box;
5. The roll mill operator and/or lead
shall remove the equipment lock box
lock key from the secondary group lock
box and take it to the pulpit;
6. The roll mill operator and/or lead
shall hand the equipment lock box lock
key to the pulpit operator;
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7. The pulpit operator shall verify that
all personnel are clear of the equipment
before starting to re-energize the roll
mill passes;
8. The pulpit operator shall remove
his or her trapped key system personal
lock from the pulpit designated lock
box;
9. Using the equipment lock box lock
key, the pulpit operator shall remove
the equipment lock box lock;
10. The pulpit operator shall remove
the trapped key from the pulpit
designated lock box and shall insert the
key into the rotary switch and turn it
90° to the ON position;
11. The pulpit operator shall press the
reset button to re-energize the roll mill
passes;
12. The pulpit operator shall confirm
that the green light clears and the red
light activates indicating that the system
is powered and that the trapped key
system no longer prevents roll mill
motion; and
13. The pulpit operator shall notify
affected employees that the task of
grinding the roll mill passes is complete
and that the roll mill passes are ready
for use.
F. Training and Methods of Operation
NSCI shall develop and implement a
detailed worker qualifications and
training program. NSCI must:
1. Develop an energy control training
program and train each authorized
employee, pulpit operator, roll mill
designated person, and their supervisors
on the trapped key system, and the
procedures each must perform under it.
The training program shall be provided
in a language that the employees can
understand;
2. Develop a training program and
train each affected employee in the
purpose and use of the alternative
energy control procedures using the
trapped key system before commencing
operations under this variance, and
document this instruction. The training
program shall be provided in a language
that the employees can understand;
3. Repeat the instruction specified in
paragraph (1) of this condition
periodically and as necessary (e.g., after
making changes, in accordance with
condition I–5, to the use of the trapped
key system that affect its component
configuration or operation and
associated energy control procedures);
4. Ensure that each authorized and
affected employee, designated pulpit
operator, roll mill designated person,
and each of their supervisors have
effective and documented training in
the contents and conditions covered by
this proposed variance;
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5. Ensure that only trained and
authorized employees, designated
pulpit operators, and roll mill
designated persons, perform energy
control procedures for the task of
grinding roll mill passes;
6. Prepare a JHA for the safe
application of energy control
procedures; and
7. Review periodically and as
necessary (e.g., after making changes, in
accordance with conditions C–13 and I–
5, to the component configuration or
operation of the trapped key system and
energy control procedures that affect the
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands), the contents of the
JHA with affected personnel.
G. Inspections, Tests and Incident
Prevention
NSCI shall develop and implement a
detailed program for completing
inspections, tests, program evaluations
and incident prevention. NSCI must:
1. Initiate and maintain a program of
frequent and regular inspections of the
trapped key system and associated work
areas by:
a. Ensuring that a competent person
(authorized employee) conducts daily
visual checks and quarterly inspections
and functionality tests of the trapped
key system components and
configuration or operation and energy
control procedures that affect the
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands to ensure that the
procedure and the conditions of this
variance are being followed;
b. Ensuring that a competent person
conducts weekly inspections of the
work areas associated with the grinding
of roll mill passes located in the roll
mill stands; and
c. Developing a set of checklists to be
used by a competent person in
conducting the weekly inspections of
the work areas associated with the
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands and the quarterly
inspections and functionality tests of
the trapped key system components and
configuration or operation and energy
control procedures that affect the
grinding of roll mill passes.
2. Remove the equipment from service
if the competent person determines that
the equipment constitutes a safety
hazard. NSCI must not return the
equipment to service until the
hazardous condition is corrected and
the correction has been approved by a
qualified person.
3. All maintenance, servicing, and
installation of replacement parts must
be performed in strict accordance with
good engineering practices. Where
available, the maintenance, servicing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
and installation of replacement parts
must strictly follow the manufacturers’
specifications, instructions, and
limitations.
H. Recordkeeping
1. NSCI must maintain a record of any
recordable injury, illness, in-patient
hospitalizations, amputations, loss of an
eye or fatality (using the OSHA 301
Incident Report form to investigate and
record energy control-related recordable
injuries as defined by 29 CFR 1904.4,
1904.7, 1904.8 through 1904.12 9),
resulting from the task of grinding roll
mill passes located in the roll mill
stands by completing the OSHA 301
Incident Report form and OSHA 300
Log of Work-Related Injuries and
Illnesses.
2. NSCI must maintain records of all
tests and inspections of the component
configuration or operation, and energy
control procedures, as well as associated
hazardous condition corrective actions
and repairs.
I. Notifications
To assist OSHA in administering the
conditions specified herein, NSCI shall:
1. Notify the OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office of any
recordable injuries, illnesses, in-patient
hospitalizations, amputations, loss of an
eye or fatality (by submitting the
completed OSHA 301 Incident Report
form) resulting from implementing the
alternative energy control procedures of
the proposed variance conditions while
completing the task of grinding roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands.
The notification must be made within 8
hours of the incident or 8 hours after
becoming aware of a recordable injury,
illness, in-patient hospitalizations,
amputations, loss of an eye, or fatality.
2. Submit a copy of the preliminary
incident investigation (OSHA form 301)
to the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT,
Area Office within 24 hours of the
incident or 24 hours after becoming
aware of a recordable case and submit
a copy of the full incident investigation
within 7 calendar days of the incident
or 7 calendar days after becoming aware
of the case. In addition to the
information required by the OSHA form
301, the incident-investigation report
must include a root-cause
determination, and the preventive and
corrective actions identified and
implemented.
3. Provide certification within 15
working days of the incident that NSCI
informed affected workers of the
incident and the results of the incident
investigation (including the root-cause
9 See
PO 00000
footnote 5.
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20687
determination and preventive and
corrective actions identified and
implemented).
4. Notify the OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office in writing
and 15 working days prior to any
proposed change in the energy control
operations (including changes
addressed by condition C–13) that
affects NSCI’s ability to comply with the
conditions specified herein.
5. Obtain OSHA’s approval prior to
implementing the proposed change in
the energy control operations that
affects NSCI’s ability to comply with the
conditions specified herein.
6. Provide a written evaluation report,
by January 31st at the beginning of each
calendar year, with a report covering the
year just ended, to the OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office
summarizing the quarterly inspections
and functionality tests of the trapped
key system components and
configuration or operation and energy
control procedures that affect the
grinding of roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands, to ensure that the
energy control procedure and the
conditions of this variance are being
followed.
Note: The evaluation report is to contain
summaries of: (1) The number of variancerelated incidents (as recorded on OSHA 301
forms); and (2) root causes of any incidents,
and preventive and corrective actions
identified and implemented.
7. Inform the OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office as soon as
possible after it has knowledge that it
will:
a. Cease to do business;
b. change the location and address of
the main office for managing the
alternative energy control procedures
specified herein; or
c. transfer the operations specified
herein to a successor company.
8. Notify all affected employees of this
permanent variance by the same means
required to inform them of its
application for a variance.
9. Request approval from OSHA for
the transfer of the permanent variance to
a successor company.
Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210, authorized the preparation of
this notice. Accordingly, the Agency is
issuing this notice pursuant to Section
29 U.S.C. 655(6)(d), Secretary of Labor’s
Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1905.11.
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
20688
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 4,
2016.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2016–08004 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Extend a Current Information
Collection
National Science Foundation.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request renewal of this collection. In
accordance with the requirement of
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this action. After obtaining
and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting
that OMB approve clearance of this
collection for three years.
Comments: Written comments are
invited on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the NSF, including whether
the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the NSF’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by June 7, 2016 to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
For Additional Information or
Comments: Contact Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265,
Arlington, Virginia 22230; telephone
(703) 292–7556; or send email to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Apr 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
8:00 p.m., Eastern time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Higher Education
Research and Development Survey
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0100.
Expiration Date of Current Approval:
September 30, 2016.
Type of Request: Intent to Extend a
Current Information Collection.
Abstract: The Higher Education
Research and Development (R&D)
Survey (formerly known as the Survey
of R&D Expenditures at Universities and
Colleges) originated in fiscal year (FY)
1954 and has been conducted annually
since FY 1972. The survey represents
one facet of the higher education
component of the NSF’s National Center
for Science and Engineering Statistics
(NCSES) statistical program authorized
by the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 § 505,
codified in the National Science
Foundation Act of 1950 (NSF Act), as
amended, at 42 U.S.C. 1862. Under
paragraph ‘‘b’’, NCSES is directed to
‘‘(1) collect, acquire, analyze, report,
and disseminate statistical data related
to the science and engineering
enterprise in the U.S. and other nations
that is relevant and useful to
practitioners, researchers, policymakers,
and the public, including statistical data
on
(A) research and development trends;
(B) the science and engineering
workforce;
(C) U.S. competitiveness in science,
engineering, technology, and research
and development . . .’’
Use of the Information: The proposed
project will continue the annual survey
cycle for three years. The Higher
Education R&D Survey will provide
continuity of statistics on R&D
expenditures by source of funding, type
of R&D (basic research, applied
research, or development), and field of
research, with separate data requested
on research equipment by field. Further
breakdowns are collected on funds
passed through to subrecipients and
funds received as a subrecipient, and on
R&D expenditures by field from specific
federal agency sources. As of FY 2010,
the survey also requests total R&D
expenditures funded from foreign
sources, R&D within an institution’s
medical school, clinical trial
expenditures, R&D by type of funding
mechanism (contracts vs. grants), and
R&D by cost category (salaries,
equipment, software, etc.). The survey
also requests headcounts of principal
investigators and other personnel paid
from R&D funds.
Data are published in NSF’s annual
publication series Higher Education
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Research and Development, available on
the web at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
srvyherd/.
Expected respondents: The FY 2016
Higher Education R&D Survey will be
administered to an expected minimum
of 600 institutions. In addition, a shorter
version of the survey asking for R&D
expenditures by source of funding and
broad field will be sent to
approximately 300 institutions spending
under $1 million on R&D in their
previous fiscal year. Finally, a survey
requesting R&D expenditures by source
of funds, cost categories, and type of
R&D will be administered to the 42
Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers.
Estimate of burden: The survey is a
fully automated web data collection
effort and is handled primarily by
administrators in university sponsored
programs and accounting offices. To
minimize burden, institutions are
provided with an abundance of
guidance and resources on the web, and
are able to respond via downloadable
spreadsheet if desired. Each institution’s
record is pre-loaded with the 2 previous
years of comparable data that facilitate
editing and trend checking. Response to
this voluntary survey has exceeded 95
percent each year.
The average burden estimate is 54
hours for the approximately 650
institutions reporting over $1 million in
R&D expenditures, 8 hours for the
approximately 280 institutions reporting
less than $1 million, and 11 hours for
the 42 organizations completing the
FFRDC survey. The total calculated
burden across all forms is 37,802 hours.
Dated: April 5, 2016.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2016–08089 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–027 and 52–028; NRC–
2008–0441]
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station,
Units 2 and 3 South Carolina Electric
& Gas Company; Control Rod Drive
Mechanism Motor Generator Set Field
Relay Change
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined
license amendment; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is granting an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20680-20688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. OSHA-2014-0022]
Nucor Steel Connecticut Incorporated; Grant of a Permanent
Variance
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA grants a permanent variance to Nucor
Steel Connecticut Incorporated from the provisions of OSHA standards
that regulate the control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout).
DATES: The permanent variance specified by this notice, becomes
effective on April 8, 2016 and shall remain in effect until it is
modified or revoked.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room N-3647, Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-1999;
email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210; phone:
(202) 693-2110 or email: robinson.kevin@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register notice.
Electronic copies of this Federal Register notice are available at
https://www.regulations.gov. This Federal Register notice, as well as
news releases and other relevant information, also are available at
OSHA's Web page at https://www.osha.gov.
I. Notice of Application
On September 22, 2014, Nucor Steel Connecticut Incorporated
(hereafter, ``NSCI'' or ``the applicant'') 35 Toelles Road,
Wallingford, CT 06492, submitted under Section 6(d) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (``OSH Act''; 29 U.S.C. 655) and 29 CFR
1905.11 (``Variances and other relief under section 6(d)'') an
application for a permanent variance from several provisions of the
OSHA standard that regulates the control of hazardous energy
(``lockout/tagout'' or ``LOTO''), as well as a request for an interim
order pending OSHA's decision on the application for variance (Ex.
OSHA-2014-0022-0003) at its Wallingford, CT facility. Specifically,
NSCI was seeking a variance from the provisions of the standard that
require: (1) Lockout or tagout devices be affixed to each energy
isolating device by authorized employees (29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i));
and (2) lockout devices, where used, be affixed in a manner that holds
the energy isolating devices in a ``safe'' or ``off'' position (29 CFR
1910.147(d)(4)(ii)). Also, NSCI requested an interim order pending
OSHA's decision on the application for variance.
According to its application, NSCI manufactures steel wire rod and
coiled rebar from billets of steel by using rolling and forming
processes. Further, NSCI's description of its operation indicated that
the hot steel billets are shaped and formed into steel wire rod and
coiled rebar by running them through a series of rolls. The rolls shape
and form the steel as it moves from one stand to the next. Each roll
has several passes (or grooves), only one of which is used at a time.
The pass is designed to shape the bar to a certain size as it goes
through the mill by compressing, squeezing, and stretching the bar.
Rolls are designed with passes to bring a bar down through roughing,
intermediate and finish mills to a finished size.
As with any shaping tool, the passes wear during use and from time
to time need to be changed. As the pass wears, the shape of the bar and
the appearance of the bar are affected. When new rolls are brought into
production, every pass is prepared with a spray that provides friction
which allows the rolls to bite the bar between the rolls. Once rolls
are in operation, roll grinding is regularly required, because during
the operation of the mill stands water is used to cool the rolls to
prevent fracturing and damage to the rolls. The water protects the pass
while in use, but it also creates rust in the other passes. The rust
can affect the final quality of the bar being processed, so steps are
taken to remove the rust prior to restarting the operations. Rust is
removed from the passes using a common 4-inch hand grinder. Since
January 2012, the rolls have been ground with the rolls stopped and
locked out.
NSCI asserted that grinding the rolls requires access to the Motor
Control Room (MCR), in order to operate the energy isolation
disconnects for the roll mills. Employees who perform the particular
task of grinding the passes are exposed to potentially serious arc
flash hazards if they accessed the MCR in order to perform energy
isolation functions. To control exposure to the arc flash hazards, NSCI
instituted safe work rules that: (1) Designate the MCR as a restricted
entry work area; (2) restrict MCR access to qualified electricians
only; and (3) prohibit employees who perform pass grinding from
entering the MCR because they are not qualified electrical employees
trained in recognition and mitigation of electrical hazards. Further,
NSCI asserted that as a consequence of following these safe work rules
the employees performing pass grinding cannot lockout the energy
isolation disconnects located in the MCR or personally verify that a
lockout has been performed.
OSHA initiated a technical review of NSCI's variance application
and developed a set of follow-up questions regarding the assertions of
equivalent worker protection included in the application. On November
26, 2014, OSHA sent NSCI a letter containing a set of follow-up
questions (Ex. OSHA-2014-0022-0006). On December 19, 2014, NSCI
provided its responses to the follow-up questions (Ex. OSHA-2014-0022-
0007). Based on these responses to the follow-up questions and the
alternate safety measures proposed in NSCI's application, on May 22,
2015, the Agency sent NSCI a letter (Ex. OSHA-2014-0022-0009)
describing its findings on the technical merits of the application.
OSHA's letter also included a set of proposed conditions for the grant
of an interim order and permanent variance and a request for NSCI's
comments on these proposed conditions. On July 10, 2015, NSCI provided
its response (Ex. OSHA-2014-0022-0010) indicating acceptance of the
proposed conditions and including a few recommended changes. OSHA
carefully reviewed NSCI's recommended changes and incorporated the
majority of the changes into the conditions of the variance.
Following this review, OSHA determined that the applicant proposed
an alternative that provides a workplace as safe and healthful as that
provided by the standard. On December 2, 2015, OSHA published a
preliminary Federal Register announcing NSCI's application for a
permanent variance and interim
[[Page 20681]]
order, grant of an interim order, and request for comments (80 FR
75472).
The comment period closed on January 4, 2016, and OSHA received one
comment (Ex. OSHA-2014-0022-0012) from the Association for Packaging
and Processing Technologies in support of granting NSCI the variance.
II. The Variance Application
A. Background
NSCI's variance application and the responses to OSHA's follow-up
questions included the following: Detailed descriptions of the
manufacturing process; the equipment used; the proposed alternative to
lockout/tagout (LOTO) devices and procedures implemented during
servicing and maintenance of specific equipment (e.g., grinding of roll
mill passes located in the roll mill stands); and technical evidence
supporting NSCI's assertions of equivalency of worker protection.
According to the information included in its application,
performing lockout on the roll mill stands requires access to the MCR,
an area restricted to qualified electricians. Because NSCI employees
who perform the particular task of grinding the passes are not
qualified electrical employees trained in recognition and mitigation of
electrical hazards, they may not access the MCR. Therefore, they cannot
use the EID in that location to isolate the hazardous electrical energy
or personally verify that energy isolation has been achieved if the EID
is operated by a qualified employee.
To address these issues, NSCI developed an alternative method of
preventing the unexpected startup or energization of the roll mill
passes located in the roll mill stands. NSCI proposes to use a
comprehensive engineered system and appropriate administrative
procedures to meet the energy isolation requirements. The engineered
system uses a ``trapped key'' concept and monitored safety-rated power
relays in combination with administrative procedures. The trapped key
system is designed to: Replace a locked out energy isolating device;
and function similarly (to a lockout device), in that only the employee
in possession of the key can restart the machine undergoing
maintenance. The single key is controlled through administrative group
lockout procedures that NSCI believes match the requirements of 29 CFR
1910.147.
Further, NSCI asserted that its proposed trapped key energy control
system has been evaluated \1\ for three scenarios that could result in
unexpected energization of the rolls including: (1) Intentional de-
energization; (2) intentional re-energization; and (3) potential
faults. The system prevents unexpected startup or energization in all
three scenarios.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NSCI provided documentation that TUV Rheinland, an
independent third-party testing laboratory reviewed and certified
that the trapped key interlock system is a suitable component for
use in safety category 2, 3, and 4 safety systems as specified in
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) machinery standards. Further,
NSCI asserted that several independent experts (including Dr. James
Barrett, Mr. Ed Grund, Mr. Bruce Main, and Mr. Alan Metelsky)
skilled in the evaluation of electrical circuitry, guarding, and the
control of hazardous energy evaluated the circuitry of the trapped
key system and found that it was appropriately designed and
installed for this application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant contended that the alternative safety measures
included in its application provide its workers with a place of
employment that is at least as safe and healthful as they would obtain
under the existing provisions of OSHA's control of hazardous energy
(lockout/tagout) standard. The applicant certified that it provided
employee representatives with a copy of the variance application. The
applicant also certified that it notified its workers of the variance
application by posting, at prominent locations where it normally posts
workplace notices, a summary of the application and information
specifying where the workers can examine a copy of the application. In
addition, the applicant informed its workers of their rights to
petition the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and
Health for a hearing on the variance application.
B. Variance From Paragraph (d)(4)(i) and (d)(4)(ii) of 29 CFR 1910.147
As an alternative means of compliance to the requirements of
1910.147(d)(4(i) and (ii), NSCI proposed to use a comprehensive
engineered system and appropriate administrative procedures to meet
these requirements. The engineered system uses a ``trapped key''
concept and monitored safety-rated power relays in combination with
administrative procedures. The trapped key system is designed to:
Replace a locked out energy isolating device; and function similarly
(to a lockout device), in that only the employee in possession of the
key can restart the machine undergoing maintenance. The single key is
controlled through administrative group lockout procedures identical to
those required by 29 CFR 1910.147. Although the trapped key prevents
normal intended startup of the equipment being serviced, it is not
being used on an EID, as required by OSHA's standards. To meet this
requirement, NSCI proposed to use a monitored safety-relay system that
uses approved components, redundant systems, and control-reliable
circuitry. Use of the trapped key system in combination with detailed
administrative energy control policies and procedures, as well as
providing effective training allows NSCI's authorized and affected
employees to complete the required grinding of its stationary rolls in
a manner that provides equivalency in energy isolation to compliance
with the applicable provisions of the LOTO standard. The trapped key
system is based on use of an Allen Bradley GuardMaster safety-rated
relay, which is specifically designed for safety applications. However,
the use of the Allen Bradley GuardMaster safety-rated relay does not
meet the LOTO standard's definition of EID because this relay is a form
of control circuitry.
The applicant maintains that use of the trapped key system provides
equivalent safety with what can be achieved by strict compliance with
the 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) requirements. According to NSCI's
variance application, equivalent safety is achieved by prohibiting roll
movement during de-energization while grinding is being performed, as
well as prohibiting mistaken intentional re-energization and re-
energization due to fault conditions, without exposing employees to
hazards within the MCR. To protect against system faults causing re-
energization, the trapped key system meets the requirements for control
reliability as stated in ANSI B11.19 (2010) Performance of
Safeguarding, in that no single fault results in the loss of the safety
function. In addition, the system includes system fault monitoring,
tamper resistance, and exclusive employee control over lockout devices.
Further, the applicant asserted that the trapped key system uses
well tried components, which is a key factor in the reliability of a
control system. The system is based on an Allen Bradley GuardMaster
safety-rated relay which is specifically designed for safety
applications. The trapped key is a specially manufactured unique key
that is only available from the manufacturer at a significant cost, and
cannot be otherwise duplicated.
C. Technical Review
OSHA conducted a review of NSCI's application and the supporting
technical documentation. After completing the review of the application
[[Page 20682]]
and supporting documentation, OSHA concluded that NSCI:
1. Modified the electrical controls at the pulpit (central control
station located on the roll mill floor for the 15 roll mill stands), to
prevent employee exposure to hazards associated with movement of the
roll mill while performing the task of grinding roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands;
2. Installed a trapped key control system and implemented
administrative energy control procedures that prevent employee exposure
to hazards associated with energy while grinding on the roll mill
passes;
3. Utilizing qualified engineering safety experts, performed a job
hazard analysis for roll grinding associated tasks, conducted and
documented an electrical isolation analysis, system and functional
safety reviews, and control reliability analysis to verify that the use
of the trapped key system and administrative energy control procedures
prevent the movement of roll mill passes; prevent mistaken or
intentional re-energization; and maintain immobility in the event of
fault conditions;
4. Developed a two-tiered system of securing the trapped key as
follows:
a. Stopping the operation and energization of the roll mill passes
by removing the trapped key from the system, and securing the key
within a lock box inside the pulpit area (central control station
located on the roll mill floor for the 15 roll mill stands); and
b. Locking the key to the lock box in the pulpit area inside a
secondary group lock box installed on the roll mill floor, with each
employee performing roll mill grinding applying their personal lock to
the lock box;
5. Developed detailed administrative energy control procedures for
use of the trapped key system;
6. Implemented detailed administrative energy control procedures
designed to ensure that each authorized employee applies a personal
lock to the secondary group lock box;
7. Procured and provided appropriate equipment and supplies;
8. Made the administrative energy control policies and procedures
available in English and Spanish;
9. Trained authorized and affected employees on the application of
the trapped key system and associated administrative energy control
policies and procedures;
10. Ensured that grinding on the passes is conducted only while
using the administrative energy control procedures based on the trapped
key system;
11. Installed guarding on the entry/infeed and exit/outfeed sides
of each roll mill stand to prevent employees from standing between
turning mills and being exposed to the crushing hazards of in-running
nip points;
12. Developed additional administrative controls and procedures to
minimize the potential for authorized and affected employees to enter
between the mill stands when harm could occur; and
13. Designated and posted the areas as ``No Entry'' unless the
procedures (1-12 above) are followed.
III. Description of the Conditions Specified for the Permanent Variance
As previously indicated in this notice, OSHA conducted a review of
NSCI's application and the supporting technical documentation. After
completing the review of the application and supporting documentation,
OSHA determined that NSCI developed, and proposed to implement,
effective alternative means of protection that protect its employees as
effectively as paragraphs 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of OSHA's LOTO
standard during the servicing and maintenance task of grinding roll
mill passes located in the roll mill stands. Therefore, on December 2,
2015, OSHA published a preliminary Federal Register announcing NSCI's
application for a permanent variance and interim order, grant of an
interim order, and request for comments (80 FR 75472). The comment
period closed on January 4, 2016, and OSHA received one comment (Ex.
OSHA-2014-0022-0012) from the Association for Packaging and Processing
Technologies in support of granting NSCI the variance.
During the period starting with the December 2, 2015, publication
of the preliminary Federal Register notice announcing grant of the
interim order (80 FR 75472), until the Agency modifies or revokes the
interim order or makes a decision on its application for a permanent
variance, the applicant was required to comply fully with the
conditions of the interim order as an alternative to complying with the
requirements of 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and 1910.147(d)(4)(ii). With
the publication of this notice, OSHA is revoking the interim order
granted to the employer on December 2, 2015 (80 FR 75472).
This section describes the conditions that comprise the alternative
means of compliance with 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (d)(4)(ii). Also,
these conditions provide additional detail regarding the conditions
that form the basis of the permanent variance OSHA is granting to NSCI.
Condition A: Scope
The scope of the permanent variance limits coverage of the
conditions of the permanent variance to the work situations specified
under this condition. Clearly defining the scope of the permanent
variance provides NSCI, NSCI's employees, other stakeholders, the
public, and OSHA with necessary information regarding the work
situations in which the permanent variance applies and does not apply.
For example, condition A limits coverage of the permanent variance only
to the task of grinding roll mill passes located in the roll mill
stands. The condition clarifies that no other maintenance work,
including electrical maintenance, can be performed on the roll mill
passes, the roll mill motors, other residual or stored energy sources,
or electric circuits connected to the trapped key system or roll mill
stands using the trapped key system to control hazardous energy.
According to 29 CFR 1905.11, an employer or class or group of
employers \2\ may request a permanent variance for a specific workplace
or workplaces. If granted, the variance applies only to the specific
employer(s) that submitted the application. In this instance, the
permanent variance applies to NSCI at its Wallingford, CT plant only.
As a result, it is important to understand that permanent variance does
not apply to any other employers or NSCI plant locations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A class or group of employers (such as members of a trade
alliance or association) may apply jointly for a variance provided
an authorized representative for each employer signs the application
and the application identifies each employer's affected facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition B: Definitions
Condition B defines a series of terms, mostly technical terms, used
in the permanent variance to standardize and clarify their meaning.
Defining these terms serves to enhance the applicant's and its
employees' understanding of the conditions specified by the permanent
variance.
Condition C: Safety and Health Practices
Condition C requires the applicant to: (1) Modify certain controls
at the pulpit by installing and operating a trapped key system designed
to replace an energy isolating device; (2) develop and implement
certain trapped key system-related alternate energy control policies
and procedures; and (3) develop and implement a series of trapped key
[[Page 20683]]
system-related hazard prevention and control requirements and methods
designed to ensure the continued effective functioning of the alternate
energy control equipment, policies, and procedures. Examples of such
hazard control measures include, but are not limited to: (1) Conducting
grinding on the passes only after using the steps required to properly
de-energize the system; (2) under the direction of a qualified
person,\3\ ensuring that the trapped key system is installed,
inspected, serviced, maintained, used, and when appropriate modified in
accordance with good engineering practices, and/or in strict accordance
with the manufacturers' specifications and instructions, where
available; and (3) no other maintenance can be performed on the roll
mill stands while grinding is taking place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See footnote 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition D: Steps Required To De-Energize the System
Condition D requires the applicant to develop and implement a
detailed procedure for de-energizing the roll mill passes located in
the roll mill stands in order to perform the grinding task. The
procedure for de-energizing the roll mill passes includes a series of
steps to ensure that all authorized and effected employees are notified
that: The roll mill passes are effectively de-energized; the task of
grinding the roll mill passes is ready to begin; and no other servicing
or maintenance is to be performed on the roll mill stands while
grinding is taking place.
Condition E: Steps Required To Start Motion Intentionally
Condition E requires the applicant to develop and implement a
detailed procedure for re-energizing and intentionally starting motion
in the roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands in order to
resume normal operations at the conclusion of the grinding task. The
procedure for re-energizing the roll mill passes includes a series of
steps to ensure that all authorized and effected employees are notified
that the task of grinding the roll mill passes is complete and that the
roll mill passes are ready for use.
Condition F: Training and Methods of Operation
Condition F requires the applicant to develop and implement an
effective hazardous energy control qualification and training program
for authorized employees involved in using the trapped key system while
grinding roll mill passes. The condition specifies the factors that an
employee must know following completion of the training program.
Elements to be included in the training program encompass, among
others: The program to be presented in language that the employees can
understand; the instruction be reviewed periodically to accommodate
changes in the energy control program; the contents and conditions
included in the variance; the preparation of a job hazard analysis
(JHA) describing the application of the trapped key system, the
identification of associated hazards and safe use of the associated
energy control procedures; and instruction regarding the safe use of
the associated energy control procedures. Additionally, condition F
also requires the applicant to train each affected employee in the
purpose and use of the alternative energy control procedures using the
trapped key system.
Condition G: Inspections, Tests, and Accident Prevention
Condition G requires the applicant to develop, implement and
operate an effective program for completing inspections, tests, program
evaluations, and accident prevention measures for the use of the
trapped key system and safe application of the hazardous energy control
procedures in the roll mill stands and associated work areas. This
condition serves to ensure the safe operation and physical integrity of
the equipment and work area. Use of the trapped key system while
conducting roll mill grinding operations enhances worker safety by
reducing the risk of unexpected energization of the equipment.
This condition also requires the applicant to document tests,
inspections, corrective actions and repairs involving the use of the
trapped key system, and maintain these documents. Further, this
requirement provides the applicant with information needed to schedule
tests and inspections to ensure the continued safe operation of the
equipment and systems, and to determine that the actions taken to
correct defects are appropriate.
Condition H: Recordkeeping
Condition H requires the applicant to maintain records of specific
factors associated with use of the trapped key system implemented to
prevent the unexpected energization of the equipment while grinding
roll mill passes. The information gathered and recorded under this
provision, in concert with the information provided under condition I
(Notifications, for using the OSHA 301 Incident Report form to
investigate and record energy isolation failure-related injuries as
defined by 29 CFR 1904.4, 1904.7, 1904.8 through 1904.12), enables the
applicant and OSHA to determine the effectiveness of the permanent
variance in preventing recordable injuries.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 29 CFR 1904 Recording and Reporting Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses (https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9631); recordkeeping
forms and instructions (https://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/RKform300pkg-fillable-enabled.pdf); and Updates to OSHA's
Recordkeeping Rule (https://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping2014/).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition I: Notifications
Condition I requires the applicant, within specified periods to:
(1) Notify OSHA (i.e., Office of Technical Programs and Coordination
Activities (OTPCA), and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office) of any
recordable injuries, illnesses, fatalities, work-related in-patient
hospitalizations, amputations and all losses of an eye (as defined by
29 CFR 1904.4, and 1904.7 through 1904.12) that occur as a result of
complying with the alternative energy control conditions of the
variance (e.g., as a result of performing roll mill pass grinding
operations) within 8 hours of the incident (or becoming aware of the
incident); (2) provide OSHA (i.e., OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area
Office) with a copy of the preliminary incident investigation report
(using OSHA 301 form) within 24 hours of the incident (or becoming
aware of the incident); (3) provide OSHA (i.e., OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office) with a copy of the full incident
investigation within 7 calendar days of the incident (or becoming aware
of the incident); (4) include on the 301 form information on the energy
isolation procedures and conditions associated with the recordable
injury or illness, the root-cause determination, and preventive and
corrective actions identified and implemented; (5) provide its
certification that it informed affected workers of the incident and the
results of the incident investigation; (6) notify OTPCA and the
Bridgeport, CT, Area Office within 15 working days should the applicant
need to revise its energy isolation procedures to accommodate changes
in the application of its trapped key system that affect its ability to
comply with the conditions of the permanent variance; and (7) provide
OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office, by January 31st at the
beginning of each calendar year, with a report covering the year just
ended, evaluating the effectiveness of the alternate energy isolation
program.
[[Page 20684]]
This condition for completing and submitting the variance
conditions-related (recordable) preliminary incident investigation
report (OSHA 301 form) is more restrictive than the current
recordkeeping requirement of completing the OSHA 301 form within 7
calendar days of the incident (1904.29(b)(3)). Submittal of the
preliminary incident investigation report is to be followed by
submittal of the full incident investigation report within 7 calendar
days. This modified and more stringent incident investigation and
reporting requirement is restricted to variance conditions-related
(recordable) incidents only. Providing this notification is essential
because time is a critical element in OSHA's ability to determine the
continued effectiveness of the variance conditions in preventing
recordable incidents as well as the employer's identification of
appropriate hazard control measures and implementation of corrective
and preventive actions. Further, these notification requirements enable
the applicant, its employees, and OSHA to determine the effectiveness
of the permanent variance in providing the requisite level of safety to
the employer's workers and, based on this determination, whether to
revise or revoke the conditions of the permanent variance. Timely
notification permits OSHA to take whatever action is necessary and
appropriate to prevent further variance conditions-related recordable
injuries and illnesses. Providing notification to employees informs
them of the precautions taken by the employer to prevent similar
incidents in the future. Additionally, these notification requirements
allow OSHA to: Communicate effectively, expedite administration, and
enforce the conditions of the permanent variance.
Additionally, this condition requires the applicant to notify OSHA
if it ceases to do business, has a new address or location for its main
office, or transfers the operations covered by the permanent variance
to a successor company. In addition, the condition specifies that OSHA
must approve the transfer of the permanent variance to a successor
company. These requirements allow OSHA to communicate effectively with
the applicant regarding the status of the permanent variance, and
expedite the Agency's administration and enforcement. Stipulating that
an applicant is required to have OSHA's approval to transfer a variance
to a successor company provides assurance that the successor company
has knowledge of, and will comply with, the conditions specified by the
permanent variance. Also, seeking OSHA's approval to transfer a
variance to a successor company serves to further ensure the safety of
workers involved in performing the operations covered by the variance.
IV. Decision
As described earlier in this notice, after reviewing the proposed
alternatives OSHA determined that NSCI developed, and proposed to
implement, effective alternative means of protection that protect its
employees as effectively as paragraphs 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of
OSHA's LOTO standard during the servicing and maintenance task of
grinding roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands. Further,
under section 6(d) of the Occupational safety and Health Act of 1970
(29 U.S.C. 655(d)), and based on the record discussed above, the Agency
finds that when the employer complies with the conditions of the
variance, the working conditions of the employers' workers are at least
as safe and healthful as if the employers complied with the working
conditions specified by paragraph 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of OSHA's
LOTO standard. Therefore, under the terms of this variance NSCI must:
(1) Comply with the conditions listed below under section V of this
notice (``Order'') for the period between the date of this notice and
until the Agency modifies or revokes this final order in accordance
with 29 CFR 1905.13; (2) comply fully with all other applicable
provisions of 29 CFR part 1910; and (3) provide a copy of this Federal
Register notice to all employees affected by the conditions using the
same means it used to inform these employees of its application for a
permanent variance.
V. Order
As of the effective date of this final order, OSHA is revoking the
interim order granted to the employer on December 2, 2015 (80 FR
75472).
OSHA issues this final order authorizing Nucor Steel Connecticut
Incorporated (``NSCI'' or ``the applicant'') to comply with the
following conditions instead of complying with the requirements of
paragraphs 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii) of OSHA's LOTO standard
during the servicing and maintenance task of grinding roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands. This final order applies to all NSCI
employees located at the 35 Toelles Road, Wallingford, CT 06492
establishment during the servicing and maintenance task of grinding
roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands. These conditions are:
\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See footnote 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Scope
1. This permanent variance applies only to the task of grinding
roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands of NSCI's Wallingford,
CT establishment. This work is to be performed by authorized employees
under alternative energy control procedures using a trapped key system
and lock boxes.
2. No other maintenance work, including electrical maintenance
(such as troubleshooting or maintenance covered under 29 CFR 1910.333),
may be performed on the roll mill passes, the roll mill motors, or
electric circuits connected to the trapped key system or roll mill
stands using the trapped key system to control hazardous energy.
3. If any other maintenance or servicing work is performed, even if
that work is performed at the same time as grinding roll mill passes,
all of the maintenance work at that time must be performed under full
lockout as required by 29 CFR 1910.147.
4. Except for the requirements specified by 29 CFR
1910.147(d)(4)(i) and (ii), NSCI must comply fully with all other
applicable provisions of 29 CFR 1910.147 during servicing and
maintenance of roll mills during the task of grinding roll mill passes.
5. The interim order granted to the employer on December 2, 2015
(80 FR 75472) is hereby revoked.
B. Definitions
The following definitions apply to this permanent variance:
1. Affected employee--an employee whose job requires him/her to
work in an area in which grinding of roll mill passes located in the
roll mill stands is being performed.
2. Authorized employee--an employee who uses the trapped key system
in order to perform grinding of roll mill passes located in the roll
mill stands. An affected employee becomes an authorized employee when
that employee's duties include performing grinding of roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands covered under this section.
3. Competent person--an employee who is capable of identifying
existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings associated with
grinding of roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands or working
conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees,
and who has
[[Page 20685]]
authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Adapted from 29 CFR 1926.32(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Equipment lock box--a part of the trapped key system consisting
of any group lock box designated for and mounted on or near equipment
used for securing the equipment lock box key by use of a personal
lockout device.
5. Equipment lock box lock and key--a part of the trapped key
system consisting of a uniquely identified equipment specific lock
(red) and key used to secure the pulpit designated lock box containing
and securing the trapped key.
6. Group lock box--a purchased lock box labeled as ``TRAPPED KEY
SYSTEM'' that is used to enable more than one lock to be applied to the
box. There are two types of lock boxes used in association with the
trapped key system (see definitions for pulpit designated lock box and
secondary group lock box).
7. Job Hazard Analysis/Job Safety Analysis--an evaluation of tasks
or operations to identify potential hazards and to determine the
necessary controls.
8. Personal lock and key--a durable, standardized substantial and
uniquely identified device (a lock) that is maintained and controlled
by a single authorized employee whose name is attached to the device.
The key is unique to this device and is equally maintained and
controlled by the authorized employee \7\ whose name is attached to the
device. The personal lock and key is used to secure the equipment lock
box key in the secondary group lock box.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 29 CFR part 1910 [Docket No. S-012A], RIN 1218-AA53.
Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout), regarding
``one person, one lock, one key.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Pulpit designated lock box--a group lock box mounted inside the
pulpit designated for use with the ``TRAPPED KEY SYSTEM'' and including
the: (a) Trapped key; (b) equipment lock box lock and key; and (c)
pulpit operator personal lock and key placed on the pulpit designated
lock box to secure the trapped key.
10. Pulpit operator--an authorized employee who: (a) Is designated
to work on a roll mill crew; (b) is authorized to use the trapped key
system during the grinding of roll mill passes; and (c) is trained to
operate the pulpit panel. The pulpit panel has the ability to control
the following equipment systems: Reheat furnace, discharge roll line,
turntable, roll mill stands A & B; roll mill stands 1-15; water system;
finishing mill; laying head; and stelmore conveyor.
11. Pulpit operator trapped key system personal lock and key--a
part of the trapped key system consisting of a uniquely identified lock
(green) and key used by the pulpit operator to secure the pulpit
designated lock box containing and securing the trapped key.
12. Qualified person--an employee who, by possession of a
recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who, by
extensive knowledge, training, and experience, successfully
demonstrates an ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the
subject matter, the work, or the project.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Adapted from 29 CFR 1926.32(m).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Roll mill operator and/or lead--an authorized employee who is
designated and trained to operate specific and multiple equipment
systems or perform a specific job task that is part of the rolling
process, including application of the trapped key system for the
grinding of roll mill passes.
14. Secondary group lock box--a group lock box located on the mill
floor just below the pulpit where authorized employees apply personal
locks and follow trapped key system alternative energy isolation
procedures to secure the equipment lock box key.
15. Safety-rated relay--a device specifically designed for safety
applications that meets the requirements for control reliability as
stated in ANSI B11.19 (2010) Performance of Safeguarding. The term
``control reliable'' means that no single fault results in the loss of
the safety function. In addition, the relay must include monitoring and
tamper resistance.
16. Team member--an employee who is trained and authorized to use
the trapped key system in order to perform grinding of roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands.
17. Trapped key--a specially manufactured unique key only available
from its manufacturer that is inserted into the trapped key system's
rotary switch. The rotary switch trapped key is mechanically attached
by a chain to the pulpit designated lock box.
18. Trapped key system--the alternative method of preventing the
unexpected startup or energization during grinding of roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands. NSCI presented the trapped key system
to OSHA in its variance application of September 22, 2014, as
supplemented by its responses to OSHA's questions during the Agency's
application review. The system is based on an Allen Bradley GuardMaster
safety-rated relay which is specifically designed for safety
applications and use of a trapped key that is a specially manufactured
unique key only available from its manufacturer, and the administrative
controls described in this variance.
C. Safety and Health Practices
1. NSCI shall modify the electrical controls at the pulpit (central
control station located on the roll mill floor for the 15 roll mill
stands), to prevent employee exposure to hazards associated with
movement of the roll mill during the task of grinding roll mill passes;
2. NSCI shall install a trapped key system;
3. NSCI shall install a pulpit designated lock box for the trapped
key in the pulpit area;
4. NSCI shall install a secondary group lock box in the roll mills
floor area for securing the pulpit designated lock box key;
5. NSCI shall develop administrative energy control procedures for
use of the trapped key system as described below;
6. NSCI shall implement detailed energy control procedures designed
to ensure that each authorized employee applies a personal lock to the
secondary group lock box, and has the ability to personally verify de-
energization of the system, as described below;
7. NSCI shall make the energy control policies and procedures
available to authorized and affected employees in English and Spanish;
8. NSCI shall ensure that grinding on the passes is conducted only
while using the administrative energy control procedures based on the
trapped key system, or using full lockout procedures that comply with
29 CFR 1910.147 when the roll stands must be de-energized so that other
maintenance operations can be performed simultaneously with roll
grinding;
9. NSCI shall install guarding on the entry/infeed and exit/outfeed
sides of each roll mill stand to prevent employees from standing
between turning mills and being exposed to the crushing hazards of in-
running nip points;
10. NSCI shall develop additional administrative controls and
procedures to minimize the potential for authorized and affected
employees to enter between the mill stands when harm could occur; and
11. NSCI shall designate and post the areas as ``No Entry'' unless
the procedures (1-10) are followed.
12. NSCI shall ensure that the trapped key system and its
components are properly installed, inspected, maintained, and used so
that it works as designed. NSCI shall strictly follow, where
applicable, manufacturers'
[[Page 20686]]
recommendations for the installation, inspection, maintenance, and use
of the system and its components.
13. NSCI shall ensure that the trapped key system is only altered
or modified for uses specified and approved by a qualified person by
following good engineering practices. Where available, such alterations
and modifications shall strictly follow the manufacturers'
specifications, instructions, and written authorization. No changes or
modifications may be made to the trapped key system or its components
that diminish the protection provided to affected employees.
14. NSCI shall ensure that alteration or modification of the
trapped key system is fully justified and documented when the
manufacturers' specifications, instructions, and written authorization
are lacking.
15. NCSI shall implement a procedure to ensure that no other
maintenance will be performed on the roll mill stands while grinding is
taking place, unless full lockout is used for all maintenance tasks
being performed at that time.
D. Steps Required To De-Energize the System
NSCI shall develop and implement a detailed procedure for de-
energizing the roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands in
order to perform the grinding task. The procedure for de-energizing the
roll mill passes shall include the following steps:
1. The authorized employee de-energizing the roll mill passes shall
notify all affected employees that the equipment will be shut down and
locked out to perform grinding of the passes;
2. The pulpit operator shall turn off the control leveler on the
control panel;
3. The pulpit operator shall activate the E-stop;
4. The pulpit operator verifies that the red ``system functional''
indicator is illuminated, then turns the trapped lockout key 90[ordm]
to OFF position, and removes the trapped key from the panel. The
operator verifies that the green ``safe to work indicator''
illuminates, and that the red ``system functional'' indicator goes out;
5. The pulpit operator:
a. Places the trapped key in the pulpit designated lock box and
applies his or her personal lock to the pulpit designated lock box; and
b. Applies the equipment lock box lock designated for this energy
control procedure;
6. The pulpit operator hands the equipment lock box lock key to the
roll mill operator and/or lead;
7. The roll mill operator and/or lead takes the equipment lock box
lock key to the secondary group lock box;
8. The roll mill operator and/or lead places the equipment lock box
lock key in the secondary group lock box and attaches his or her
personal lock;
9. Authorized employees (team members) place their personal locks
on the secondary group lock box;
10. The roll mill operator and/or lead verifies that the equipment
is de-energized and locked out by trying to operate the equipment
(using the start button);
11. The roll mill operator and/or lead ensures that there are no
additional sources of energy that could lead to the unexpected
energization of the roll mill passes;
12. Authorized employees who placed their personal trapped key
system locks on the secondary group lockout box shall also confirm that
the equipment is fully de-energized;
13. Authorized employees who placed their personal locks on the
secondary group lock box shall maintain their personal key in their
possession while performing grinding of the roll mill passes; and
14. Authorized employees shall perform the task of grinding the
passes only while these procedures are used.
E. Steps Required To Start Motion Intentionally
NSCI shall develop and implement a detailed procedure for re-
energizing and intentionally starting motion in the roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands in order to resume normal operations at
the conclusion of the grinding task. The procedure for re-energizing
the roll mill passes shall include the following steps:
1. The roll mill operator and/or lead shall check the equipment and
the immediate area around the equipment to ensure that necessary items
have been removed and that the equipment components are operationally
intact;
2. The roll mill operator and/or lead shall check the work area to
ensure that all affected employees have been safely positioned or
removed from the area;
3. The roll mill operator and/or lead shall check that all controls
are in the neutral or off position;
4. Authorized employees shall remove their personal trapped key
system locks from the secondary group lock box;
5. The roll mill operator and/or lead shall remove the equipment
lock box lock key from the secondary group lock box and take it to the
pulpit;
6. The roll mill operator and/or lead shall hand the equipment lock
box lock key to the pulpit operator;
7. The pulpit operator shall verify that all personnel are clear of
the equipment before starting to re-energize the roll mill passes;
8. The pulpit operator shall remove his or her trapped key system
personal lock from the pulpit designated lock box;
9. Using the equipment lock box lock key, the pulpit operator shall
remove the equipment lock box lock;
10. The pulpit operator shall remove the trapped key from the
pulpit designated lock box and shall insert the key into the rotary
switch and turn it 90[deg] to the ON position;
11. The pulpit operator shall press the reset button to re-energize
the roll mill passes;
12. The pulpit operator shall confirm that the green light clears
and the red light activates indicating that the system is powered and
that the trapped key system no longer prevents roll mill motion; and
13. The pulpit operator shall notify affected employees that the
task of grinding the roll mill passes is complete and that the roll
mill passes are ready for use.
F. Training and Methods of Operation
NSCI shall develop and implement a detailed worker qualifications
and training program. NSCI must:
1. Develop an energy control training program and train each
authorized employee, pulpit operator, roll mill designated person, and
their supervisors on the trapped key system, and the procedures each
must perform under it. The training program shall be provided in a
language that the employees can understand;
2. Develop a training program and train each affected employee in
the purpose and use of the alternative energy control procedures using
the trapped key system before commencing operations under this
variance, and document this instruction. The training program shall be
provided in a language that the employees can understand;
3. Repeat the instruction specified in paragraph (1) of this
condition periodically and as necessary (e.g., after making changes, in
accordance with condition I-5, to the use of the trapped key system
that affect its component configuration or operation and associated
energy control procedures);
4. Ensure that each authorized and affected employee, designated
pulpit operator, roll mill designated person, and each of their
supervisors have effective and documented training in the contents and
conditions covered by this proposed variance;
[[Page 20687]]
5. Ensure that only trained and authorized employees, designated
pulpit operators, and roll mill designated persons, perform energy
control procedures for the task of grinding roll mill passes;
6. Prepare a JHA for the safe application of energy control
procedures; and
7. Review periodically and as necessary (e.g., after making
changes, in accordance with conditions C-13 and I-5, to the component
configuration or operation of the trapped key system and energy control
procedures that affect the grinding of roll mill passes located in the
roll mill stands), the contents of the JHA with affected personnel.
G. Inspections, Tests and Incident Prevention
NSCI shall develop and implement a detailed program for completing
inspections, tests, program evaluations and incident prevention. NSCI
must:
1. Initiate and maintain a program of frequent and regular
inspections of the trapped key system and associated work areas by:
a. Ensuring that a competent person (authorized employee) conducts
daily visual checks and quarterly inspections and functionality tests
of the trapped key system components and configuration or operation and
energy control procedures that affect the grinding of roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands to ensure that the procedure and the
conditions of this variance are being followed;
b. Ensuring that a competent person conducts weekly inspections of
the work areas associated with the grinding of roll mill passes located
in the roll mill stands; and
c. Developing a set of checklists to be used by a competent person
in conducting the weekly inspections of the work areas associated with
the grinding of roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands and
the quarterly inspections and functionality tests of the trapped key
system components and configuration or operation and energy control
procedures that affect the grinding of roll mill passes.
2. Remove the equipment from service if the competent person
determines that the equipment constitutes a safety hazard. NSCI must
not return the equipment to service until the hazardous condition is
corrected and the correction has been approved by a qualified person.
3. All maintenance, servicing, and installation of replacement
parts must be performed in strict accordance with good engineering
practices. Where available, the maintenance, servicing and installation
of replacement parts must strictly follow the manufacturers'
specifications, instructions, and limitations.
H. Recordkeeping
1. NSCI must maintain a record of any recordable injury, illness,
in-patient hospitalizations, amputations, loss of an eye or fatality
(using the OSHA 301 Incident Report form to investigate and record
energy control-related recordable injuries as defined by 29 CFR 1904.4,
1904.7, 1904.8 through 1904.12 \9\), resulting from the task of
grinding roll mill passes located in the roll mill stands by completing
the OSHA 301 Incident Report form and OSHA 300 Log of Work-Related
Injuries and Illnesses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See footnote 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. NSCI must maintain records of all tests and inspections of the
component configuration or operation, and energy control procedures, as
well as associated hazardous condition corrective actions and repairs.
I. Notifications
To assist OSHA in administering the conditions specified herein,
NSCI shall:
1. Notify the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office of any
recordable injuries, illnesses, in-patient hospitalizations,
amputations, loss of an eye or fatality (by submitting the completed
OSHA 301 Incident Report form) resulting from implementing the
alternative energy control procedures of the proposed variance
conditions while completing the task of grinding roll mill passes
located in the roll mill stands. The notification must be made within 8
hours of the incident or 8 hours after becoming aware of a recordable
injury, illness, in-patient hospitalizations, amputations, loss of an
eye, or fatality.
2. Submit a copy of the preliminary incident investigation (OSHA
form 301) to the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office within 24
hours of the incident or 24 hours after becoming aware of a recordable
case and submit a copy of the full incident investigation within 7
calendar days of the incident or 7 calendar days after becoming aware
of the case. In addition to the information required by the OSHA form
301, the incident-investigation report must include a root-cause
determination, and the preventive and corrective actions identified and
implemented.
3. Provide certification within 15 working days of the incident
that NSCI informed affected workers of the incident and the results of
the incident investigation (including the root-cause determination and
preventive and corrective actions identified and implemented).
4. Notify the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office in writing
and 15 working days prior to any proposed change in the energy control
operations (including changes addressed by condition C-13) that affects
NSCI's ability to comply with the conditions specified herein.
5. Obtain OSHA's approval prior to implementing the proposed change
in the energy control operations that affects NSCI's ability to comply
with the conditions specified herein.
6. Provide a written evaluation report, by January 31st at the
beginning of each calendar year, with a report covering the year just
ended, to the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office summarizing the
quarterly inspections and functionality tests of the trapped key system
components and configuration or operation and energy control procedures
that affect the grinding of roll mill passes located in the roll mill
stands, to ensure that the energy control procedure and the conditions
of this variance are being followed.
Note: The evaluation report is to contain summaries of: (1) The
number of variance-related incidents (as recorded on OSHA 301
forms); and (2) root causes of any incidents, and preventive and
corrective actions identified and implemented.
7. Inform the OTPCA and the Bridgeport, CT, Area Office as soon as
possible after it has knowledge that it will:
a. Cease to do business;
b. change the location and address of the main office for managing
the
alternative energy control procedures specified herein; or
c. transfer the operations specified herein to a successor company.
8. Notify all affected employees of this permanent variance by the
same means required to inform them of its application for a variance.
9. Request approval from OSHA for the transfer of the permanent
variance to a successor company.
Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this notice pursuant to Section 29
U.S.C. 655(6)(d), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912,
Jan. 25, 2012), and 29 CFR 1905.11.
[[Page 20688]]
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 4, 2016.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2016-08004 Filed 4-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P