AMCAP Fund, et al.; Notice of Application, 18674-18679 [2016-07193]
Download as PDF
18674
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
Filing Date: The application was filed
on March 1, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 30 Rockefeller
Plaza, New York, New York 10112.
Laudus Institutional Trust [File No.
811–08759]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Each series of
applicant has transferred its assets to a
corresponding series of Laudus Trust
and, on February 6, 2015, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on
net asset value. Expenses of
approximately $89,296 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were
paid by applicant and the acquiring
fund.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on March 1, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 211 Main Street,
San Francisco, California 94105.
Meeder Premier Portfolios [File No.
811–21424]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On October 31,
2006, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses of $84,989
incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by applicant.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on February 1, 2016, and amended
on March 1, 2016 and March 9, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 6125 Memorial
Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43017.
Tea Leaf Management Investment Trust
[File No. 811–22737]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On January 29,
2016, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses of $5,850
incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by applicant’s
investment adviser.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on March 7, 2016 and amended on
March 15, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 370 Lexington
Avenue, Suite 201, New York, New
York 10017.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cottonwood Mutual Funds [File No.
811–22602]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Applicant
transferred its assets to a corresponding
series of World Funds Trust and, on
February 8, 2016, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on
net asset value. Expenses of
approximately $10,000 incurred in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
connection with the reorganization were
paid by applicant’s investment adviser.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on March 11, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 225 West
Washington Street, 21st Floor, Chicago,
Illinois 60606.
Meyers Capital Investments Trust [File
No. 811–22180]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On February 29,
2016, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses of $2,750
incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by applicant’s
investment adviser.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on March 18, 2016.
Applicant’s Address: 2695 Sandover
Road, Columbus, Ohio 43220.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–07209 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
32049; File No. 812–14384]
AMCAP Fund, et al.; Notice of
Application
March 24, 2016.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application for an
order pursuant to section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
(‘‘Act’’) granting an exemption from
sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act;
pursuant to section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
granting an exemption from section
12(d)(1) of the Act; pursuant to sections
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and
rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION:
Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered open-end
management investment companies to
participate in a joint lending and
borrowing facility.
APPLICANTS: AMCAP Fund; American
Balanced Fund; American Funds
College Target Date Series; American
Funds Corporate Bond Fund; American
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Funds Developing World Growth and
Income Fund; American Funds
Emerging Markets Bond Fund;
American Funds Fundamental
Investors; American Funds Global
Balanced Fund; American Funds Global
High-Income Opportunities Fund; The
American Funds Income Series;
American Funds Inflation Linked Bond
Fund; American Funds Insurance
Series; American Funds Money Market
Fund; American Funds Mortgage Fund;
American Funds Portfolio Series;
American Funds Retirement Income
Portfolio Series; American Funds ShortTerm Tax-Exempt Bond Fund;
American Funds Strategic Bond Fund;
American Funds Target Date Retirement
Series; American Funds Tax-Exempt
Fund of New York; The American
Funds Tax-Exempt Series I; The
American Funds Tax-Exempt Series II;
American High-Income Municipal Bond
Fund; American High-Income Trust;
American Mutual Fund; The Bond Fund
of America; Capital Group Emerging
Markets Total Opportunities Fund;
Capital Group Private Client Services
Funds; Capital Income Builder; Capital
World Bond Fund; Capital World
Growth and Income Fund; EuroPacific
Growth Fund; The Growth Fund of
America; The Income Fund of America;
Intermediate Bond Fund of America;
International Growth and Income Fund;
The Investment Company of America;
Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
of America; The New Economy Fund;
New Perspective Fund; New World
Fund, Inc.; Short-Term Bond Fund of
America; SMALLCAP World Fund, Inc.;
The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America;
Washington Mutual Investors Fund
(each, a ‘‘Fund’’ and together, the
‘‘Funds’’); Capital Research and
Management Company (‘‘CRMC’’); and
Capital Guardian Trust Company
(‘‘CGTC’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on October 30, 2014, and amended on
March 3, 2015, August 17, 2015,
February 4, 2016, and March 22, 2016.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the application will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on April 18, 2016, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090;
Applicants: Capital Research and
Management Company, 333 South Hope
Street, 33rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA
90071.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura J. Riegel, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551–6873 or Mary Kay Frech, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each Fund is organized as a
Maryland corporation, Massachusetts
business trust or Delaware statutory
trust and is registered with the
Commission as an open-end
management investment company. Each
Fund consists of one or more multiple
series and each such series is included
in the term ‘‘Fund.’’ American Funds
Money Market Fund and American
Funds Insurance Series—Cash
Management Fund each operate as a
money market fund in reliance on rule
2a–7 under the Act (together with any
future Fund that relies on rule 2a–7, the
‘‘Money Market Funds’’). CRMC is a
Delaware corporation and CGTC is a
California corporation and an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of CRMC.
CRMC and CGTC are each registered as
an investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’).1 CRMC or CGTC
1 Applicants request that the relief also apply to
any existing or future series of the Funds and to any
other registered open-end management investment
company or series thereof advised by CRMC, CGTC,
or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the CRMC or GCTC (each
such entity, an ‘‘Adviser’’) that currently, or in the
future, is part of the same ‘‘group of investment
companies’’ as the Funds, as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act (included in the term
‘‘Funds’’). All entities that currently intend to rely
on the requested order have been named as
applicants. Any other entity that relies on the
requested order in the future will comply with the
terms and conditions set forth in the application.
Any other Adviser will be registered as an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
currently serves as the investment
adviser to the Funds.
2. At any particular time, while some
Funds enter into repurchase agreements,
or invest their cash balances in money
market funds or other short-term
instruments, other Funds may need to
borrow money for temporary purposes
to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a
trade ‘‘fail’’ in which cash payment for
a security sold by a Fund has been
delayed, or for other temporary
purposes. Under existing custody
agreements, each Fund’s custodian bank
may advance money to the Fund which
will be treated as a loan payable upon
demand and bear interest at a rate
customarily charged by the bank. These
loans are available at the custodian
bank’s discretion, in the amounts the
custodian bank chooses to make
available at the time, because they are
uncommitted.
3. If a Fund borrows from its
custodian bank, the Fund generally
would pay interest on the loan at a rate
that is significantly higher than the rate
that is earned by other (non-borrowing)
Funds on investments in repurchase
agreements, money market funds, and
other short-term instruments of the
same maturity as the bank loan.
Applicants assert that this differential
represents the profit earned by the
lender on loans and is not attributable
to any material difference in the credit
quality or risk of such transactions.
4. The Funds seek to enter into master
interfund lending agreements
(‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’) with
each other that would permit each Fund
to lend money directly to and borrow
directly from other Funds through a
credit facility for temporary purposes
(an ‘‘Interfund Loan’’). The Money
Market Funds will not participate as
borrowers in the interfund lending
facility. Applicants state that the
proposed credit facility is expected to
both reduce the Funds’ potential
borrowing costs and enhance the ability
of the lending Funds to earn higher rates
of interest on their short-term lendings.
Although the proposed credit facility
would reduce the Funds’ need to
borrow from banks, the Funds would be
free to establish and maintain
committed lines of credit or other
borrowing arrangements with
unaffiliated banks.
investment adviser under the Advisers Act. All
references to the term ‘‘Adviser’’ include
successors-in-interest to an Adviser. Successors-ininterest are limited to any entity resulting from a
reorganization of the Adviser into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18675
5. Applicants anticipate that the
proposed credit facility would provide a
borrowing Fund with savings at times
when the cash position of the borrowing
Fund is insufficient to meet temporary
cash requirements. This situation could
arise when shareholder redemptions
exceed anticipated volumes and certain
Funds have insufficient cash on hand to
satisfy such redemptions. When the
Funds liquidate portfolio securities to
meet redemption requests, they often do
not receive payment in settlement for up
to three days (or longer for certain
foreign transactions). However,
redemption requests normally are
effected immediately. The proposed
credit facility would provide a source of
immediate, short-term liquidity pending
settlement of the sale of portfolio
securities.
6. Applicants also anticipate that a
Fund could use the proposed credit
facility when a sale of securities ‘‘fails’’
due to circumstances beyond the Fund’s
control, such as a delay in the delivery
of cash to the Fund’s custodian or
improper delivery instructions by the
broker effecting the transaction. ‘‘Sales
fails’’ may present a cash shortfall if the
Fund has undertaken to purchase a
security using the proceeds from
securities sold. Alternatively, the Fund
could ‘‘fail’’ on its intended purchase
due to lack of funds from the previous
sale, resulting in additional cost to the
Fund. Use of the proposed credit facility
under these circumstances would
enable the Fund to have access to
immediate short-term liquidity.
7. While bank borrowings generally
could supply needed cash to cover
unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, under the proposed credit facility,
a borrowing Fund would pay lower
interest rates than those that would be
payable under short-term loans offered
by banks. In addition, Funds making
short-term cash loans directly to other
Funds would earn interest at a rate
higher than they otherwise could obtain
from investing their cash in repurchase
agreements or money market funds.
Thus, applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility would benefit
both borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate to be charged to
the Funds on any Interfund Loan (the
‘‘Interfund Loan Rate’’) would be the
average of the ‘‘Repo Rate’’ and the
‘‘Bank Loan Rate,’’ both as defined
below. The Repo Rate for any day would
be the highest or best (after giving effect
to factors such as the credit quality of
the counterparty) rate available to a
lending Fund from investment in
overnight repurchase agreements with
counterparties approved by the Fund or
its Adviser. The Bank Loan Rate for any
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18676
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
day would be calculated by the
Interfund Lending Committee, as
defined below, each day an Interfund
Loan is made according to a formula
established by each Fund’s board of
directors or trustees, as applicable (the
‘‘Trustees’’) intended to approximate the
lowest interest rate at which bank shortterm loans would be available to the
Funds. The formula would be based
upon a publicly available rate (e.g.,
Federal funds plus 25 basis points) and
would vary with this rate so as to reflect
changing bank loan rates. The initial
formula and any subsequent
modifications to the formula would be
subject to the approval of each Fund’s
Trustees. In addition, each Fund’s
Trustees would periodically review the
continuing appropriateness of using the
formula to determine the Bank Loan
Rate, as well as the relationship between
the Bank Loan Rate and current bank
loan rates that would be available to the
Funds.
9. Certain members of the relevant
Adviser’s fund administration personnel
and portfolio managers of the Money
Market Funds (the ‘‘Money Market
portfolio managers’’ and together with
certain members of the Adviser’s fund
administration personnel, the
‘‘Interfund Lending Committee’’) will
administer the credit facility. No
portfolio manager of any Fund (other
than a Money Market portfolio manager)
will serve as a member of the Interfund
Lending Committee. On any day on
which a Fund intends to borrow money,
the Interfund Lending Committee would
make an Interfund Loan from a lending
Fund to a borrowing Fund only if the
Interfund Loan Rate is: (i) More
favorable to the lending Fund than the
Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield
of any money market fund in which the
lending Fund could otherwise invest,
and (ii) more favorable to the borrowing
Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
10. Under the proposed credit facility,
the principal investment officer(s) (the
‘‘PIO(s)’’) for each participating Fund
could provide standing instructions to
participate daily as a borrower or
lender; alternatively, the PIO(s) could
provide instructions from time to time
as to when the Fund wishes to
participate as a borrower or lender. The
Interfund Lending Committee on each
business day would collect data on the
uninvested cash and borrowing
requirements of all participating Funds.
Once it had determined the aggregate
amount of cash available for loans and
borrowing demand, the Interfund
Lending Committee would allocate
loans among borrowing Funds without
any further communication from the
portfolio managers of the Funds (other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
than a Money Market portfolio manager
acting in his or her capacity as a
member of the Interfund Lending
Committee). All allocations made by the
Interfund Lending Committee will
require the approval of at least one
member of the Interfund Lending
Committee who has the title of Vice
President or higher in any business unit
of the relevant Adviser and is not a
Money Market portfolio manager.
Applicants anticipate that there
typically will be far more available
uninvested cash each day than
borrowing demand. Therefore, after the
Interfund Lending Committee has
allocated cash for Interfund Loans, the
Interfund Lending Committee will
invest any remaining cash in accordance
with the standing instructions of the
portfolio managers or such remaining
amounts will be invested directly by the
portfolio managers of the Funds.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee
would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the
Funds on what the Interfund Lending
Committee believes to be an equitable
basis, subject to certain administrative
procedures applicable to all Funds, such
as the time of filing requests to
participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and
the need to minimize the number of
transactions and associated
administrative costs. To reduce
transaction costs, each loan normally
would be allocated in a manner
intended to minimize the number of
participants necessary to complete the
loan transaction. The method of
allocation and related administrative
procedures would be approved by each
Fund’s Trustees, including a majority of
Trustees who are not ‘‘interested
persons’’ of the Fund, as that term is
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act
(‘‘Independent Trustees’’), to ensure that
both borrowing and lending Funds
participate on an equitable basis.
12. The relevant Adviser would: (i)
Monitor the Interfund Loan Rate and the
other terms and conditions of the loans;
(ii) limit the borrowings and loans
entered into by each Fund to ensure that
they comply with the Fund’s investment
policies and limitations; (iii) ensure
equitable treatment of each Fund; and
(iv) make quarterly reports to the
Trustees concerning any transactions by
the Funds under the proposed credit
facility and the Interfund Loan Rate
charged.
13. The relevant Adviser, through the
Interfund Lending Committee, would
administer the proposed credit facility
as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its
duties under the investment
management contract with each Fund
and would receive no additional fee as
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
compensation for its services in
connection with the administration of
the proposed credit facility. The
relevant Adviser may collect standard
pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping
and accounting fees associated with the
transfer of cash and/or securities in
connection with repurchase and lending
transactions generally, including
transactions effected through the
proposed credit facility. Such fees
would be no higher than those
applicable for comparable bank loan
transactions.
14. No Fund may participate in the
proposed credit facility unless: (i) The
Fund has obtained shareholder approval
for its participation, if such approval is
required by law; (ii) the Fund has fully
disclosed all material information
concerning the credit facility in its
prospectus and/or statement of
additional information; and (iii) the
Fund’s participation in the credit
facility is consistent with its investment
objectives and limitations and
organizational documents.
15. As part of the Trustees’ review of
the continuing appropriateness of a
Fund’s participation in the proposed
credit facility as required by condition
14, the Trustees of the Fund, including
a majority of the Independent Trustees,
also will review the process in place to
appropriately assess: (i) If the Fund
participates as a lender, any effect its
participation may have on the Fund’s
liquidity risk; and (ii) if the Fund
participates as a borrower, whether the
Fund’s portfolio liquidity is sufficient to
satisfy its obligations under the facility
along with its other liquidity needs.
16. In connection with the credit
facility, applicants request an order
under section 6(c) of the Act exempting
them from the provisions of sections
18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act exempting them
from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act
exempting them from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
under section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act to permit certain
joint arrangements.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally
prohibits any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from borrowing money or other property
from the registered investment
company. Section 21(b) of the Act
generally prohibits any registered
management company from lending
money or other property to any person,
directly or indirectly, if that person
controls or is under common control
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of
the Act defines an ‘‘affiliated person’’ of
another person, in part, to be any person
directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9)
of the Act defines ‘‘control’’ as the
‘‘power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a company,’’ but excludes
circumstances in which ‘‘such power is
solely the result of an official position
with such company.’’ Applicants state
that the Funds may be under common
control by virtue of sharing a common
investment adviser or by having an
investment adviser that is under
common control with those of the other
Funds.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
an exemptive order may be granted
where an exemption is ‘‘necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
[the Act].’’ Section 17(b) of the Act
authorizes the Commission to exempt a
proposed transaction from section 17(a)
provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration
to be paid or received, are fair and
reasonable and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and the transaction is
consistent with the policy of the
investment company as recited in its
registration statement and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants
believe that the proposed arrangements
satisfy these standards for the reasons
discussed below.
3. Applicants assert that sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act were
intended to prevent a party with strong
potential adverse interests to, and some
influence over the investment decisions
of, a registered investment company
from causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending
transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of such party and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do
not raise these concerns because: (i) The
relevant Adviser, through the Interfund
Lending Committee, would administer
the program as a disinterested fiduciary
as part of its duties under the
investment management contract with
the applicable Fund; (ii) all Interfund
Loans would consist only of uninvested
cash reserves that the lending Fund
otherwise would invest in short-term
repurchase agreements or other shortterm instruments either directly or
through a money market fund; (iii) the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
Interfund Loans would not involve a
significantly greater risk than such other
investments; (iv) the lending Fund
would receive interest at a rate higher
than it could otherwise obtain through
such other investments; and (v) the
borrowing Fund would pay interest at a
rate lower than otherwise available to it
under its bank loan agreements and
avoid some up-front commitment fees
associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, applicants assert that
the other terms and conditions that
applicants propose also would
effectively preclude the possibility of
any Fund obtaining an undue advantage
over any other Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits an affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or any
affiliated person of such a person, from
selling securities or other property to
the investment company. Section
17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an
affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, from
purchasing securities or other property
from the investment company. Section
12(d)(1) of the Act generally prohibits a
registered investment company from
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any
security issued by any other investment
company except in accordance with the
limitations set forth in that section.
5. Applicants state that the obligation
of a borrowing Fund to repay an
Interfund Loan could be deemed to
constitute a security for the purposes of
sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1).
Applicants also state that any pledge of
assets in connection with an Interfund
Loan could be construed as a purchase
of the borrowing Fund’s securities or
other property for purposes of section
17(a)(2) of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act provides that the Commission
may exempt persons or transactions
from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if
and to the extent that such exemption
is consistent with the public interest
and the protection of investors.
Applicants submit that the requested
exemptions from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2) and 12(d)(1) are appropriate in
the public interest, and consistent with
the protection of investors and policies
and purposes of the Act for all the
reasons set forth above in support of
their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b). Applicants also state
that the requested relief from section
17(a)(2) of the Act meets the standards
of section 6(c) and 17(b) because any
collateral pledged to secure an Interfund
Loan would be subject to the same
conditions imposed by any other lender
to a Fund that imposes conditions on
the quality of or access to collateral for
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18677
a borrowing (if the lender is another
Fund) or the same or better conditions
(in any other circumstance).
6. Applicants state that section
12(d)(1) was intended to prevent the
pyramiding of investment companies in
order to avoid imposing on investors
additional and duplicative costs and
fees attendant upon multiple layers of
investments. Applicants submit that the
proposed credit facility does not involve
these abuses. Applicants note that there
will be no duplicative costs or fees to
the Funds or their shareholders, and
that the Adviser will receive no
additional compensation for its services
in administering the credit facility.
Applicants also note that the purpose of
the proposed credit facility is to provide
economic benefits for all the
participating Funds and their
shareholders.
7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits
open-end investment companies from
issuing any senior security except that
a company is permitted to borrow from
any bank, provided, that immediately
after the borrowing, there is asset
coverage of at least 300 per centum for
all borrowings of the company. Under
section 18(g) of the Act, the term ‘‘senior
security’’ generally includes any bond,
debenture, note or similar obligation or
instrument constituting a security and
evidencing indebtedness. Applicants
request exemptive relief under section
6(c) from section 18(f)(1) only to the
limited extent necessary to permit a
Fund to lend to or borrow directly from
other Funds. The Funds would remain
subject to the requirement of section
18(f)(1) that all borrowings of a Fund,
including combined interfund and bank
borrowings, have at least 300% asset
coverage. Based on the conditions and
safeguards described in the application,
applicants submit that to allow the
Funds to borrow directly from other
Funds pursuant to the proposed credit
facility is consistent with the purposes
and policies of section 18(f)(1).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act generally prohibit
an affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, when acting as
principal, from effecting any joint
transaction in which the investment
company participates, unless, upon
application, the transaction has been
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d–
1(b) under the Act provides that in
passing upon an application filed under
the rule, the Commission will consider
whether the participation of the
registered investment company in a
joint enterprise on the basis proposed is
consistent with the provisions, policies
and purposes of the Act and the extent
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
18678
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to which such participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than
that of the other participants.
9. Applicants assert that the purpose
of section 17(d) is to avoid overreaching
by and unfair advantage to insiders.
Applicants assert that the proposed
credit facility is consistent with the
provisions, policies and purposes of the
Act in that it offers both reduced
borrowing costs and enhanced returns
on loaned funds to all participating
Funds and their shareholders.
Applicants note that each Fund would
have an equal opportunity to borrow
and lend on equal terms consistent with
its investment policies and fundamental
investment limitations. Applicants
assert that each Fund’s participation in
the proposed credit facility would be on
terms that are no different from or less
advantageous than that of other
participating Funds.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the
average of the Repo Rate and the Bank
Loan Rate.
2. On each business day, when an
Interfund Loan is to be made, the
Interfund Lending Committee will
compare the Bank Loan Rate with the
Repo Rate and will make cash available
for Interfund Loans only if the Interfund
Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable to the
lending Fund than the Repo Rate and,
if applicable, the yield of any money
market fund in which the lending Fund
could otherwise invest; and (b) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than
the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding bank
borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund: (a) Will be at an interest rate
equal to or lower than the interest rate
of any outstanding bank loan to the
Fund; (b) will be secured at least on an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan
to the Fund that requires collateral; (c)
will have a maturity no longer than any
outstanding bank loan to the Fund (and
in any event not over seven days); and
(d) will provide that, if an event of
default by the Fund occurs under any
agreement evidencing an outstanding
bank loan to the Fund, that event of
default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund)
constitute an immediate event of default
under the Interfund Lending Agreement
entitling the lending Fund to call the
Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights
with respect to any collateral) and that
such call will be made if the lending
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
bank exercises its right to call its loan
under its agreement with the borrowing
Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured
borrowing through the proposed credit
facility if its outstanding borrowings
from all sources immediately after the
interfund borrowing total 10% or less of
its total assets, provided that if the Fund
has a secured loan outstanding from any
other lender, including but not limited
to another Fund, the Fund’s interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that
requires collateral. If a Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings immediately
after an interfund borrowing would be
greater than 10% of its total assets, the
Fund may borrow through the proposed
credit facility only on a secured basis.
A Fund may not borrow through the
proposed credit facility or from any
other source if its total outstanding
borrowings immediately after such
borrowing would be more than 331⁄3%
of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has
outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
outstanding borrowings from all sources
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the
Fund must first secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
If the total outstanding borrowings of a
Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceed 10% of its total assets for any
other reason (such as a decline in net
asset value or because of shareholder
redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of
its outstanding Interfund Loans; (b)
reduce its outstanding indebtedness to
10% or less of its total assets; or (c)
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan
by the pledge of segregated collateral
with a market value at least equal to
102% of the outstanding principal value
of the loan until the Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed
10% of its total assets, at which time the
collateral called for by this condition 5
shall no longer be required. Until each
Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund’s total outstanding
borrowings exceed 10% is repaid or the
Fund’s total outstanding borrowings
cease to exceed 10% of its total assets,
the Fund will mark the value of the
collateral to market each day and will
pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value
of the collateral that secures each
outstanding Interfund Loan at least
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
equal to 102% of the outstanding
principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund
through the proposed credit facility if
the loan would cause the lending
Fund’s aggregate outstanding loans
through the proposed credit facility to
exceed 15% of the lending Fund’s
current net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any
one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the
lending Fund’s net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans
will be limited to the time required to
obtain cash sufficient to repay such
Interfund Loan, through either the sale
of portfolio securities or the net sales of
the Fund’s shares, but in no event more
than seven days. Loans effected within
seven days of each other will be treated
as separate loan transactions for
purposes of this condition.
9. A Fund’s borrowings through the
proposed credit facility, as measured on
the day when the most recent loan was
made, will not exceed the greater of
125% of the Fund’s total net cash
redemptions for the preceding seven
calendar days or 102% of the Fund’s
sales fails for the preceding seven
calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called
on one business day’s notice by a
lending Fund and may be repaid on any
day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund’s participation in the
proposed credit facility must be
consistent with its investment objectives
and limitations and organizational
documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee
will calculate total Fund borrowing and
lending demand through the proposed
credit facility, and allocate loans on an
equitable basis among the Funds,
without the intervention of any portfolio
manager of the Funds (other than a
Money Market portfolio manager acting
in his or her capacity as a member of the
Interfund Lending Committee). All
allocations made by the Interfund
Lending Committee will require the
approval of at least one member of the
Interfund Lending Committee who has
the title of Vice President or higher in
any business unit of the relevant
Adviser and is not a Money Market
portfolio manager. The Interfund
Lending Committee will not solicit cash
for the proposed credit facility from any
Fund or prospectively publish or
disseminate loan demand data to
portfolio managers (except to the extent
that a Money Market portfolio manager
on the Interfund Lending Committee has
access to loan demand data). The
Interfund Lending Committee will
invest any amounts remaining after
satisfaction of borrowing demand in
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices
accordance with the standing
instructions of the portfolio managers or
such remaining amounts will be
invested directly by the portfolio
managers of the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee
will monitor the Interfund Loan Rate
and the other terms and conditions of
the Interfund Loans and will make a
quarterly report to the Trustees of each
Fund concerning the participation of the
Funds in the proposed credit facility
and the terms and other conditions of
any extensions of credit under the credit
facility.
14. The Trustees of each Fund,
including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, will:
(a) Review, no less frequently than
quarterly, the Fund’s participation in
the proposed credit facility during the
preceding quarter for compliance with
the conditions of any order permitting
such transactions;
(b) establish the Bank Loan Rate
formula used to determine the interest
rate on Interfund Loans and review, no
less frequently than annually, the
continuing appropriateness of the Bank
Loan Rate formula; and
(c) review, no less frequently than
annually, the continuing
appropriateness of the Fund’s
participation in the proposed credit
facility.
15. If an Interfund Loan is not paid
according to its terms and such default
is not cured within two business days
from its maturity or from the time the
lending Fund makes a demand for
payment under the provisions of the
Interfund Lending Agreement, the
Adviser will promptly refer such loan
for arbitration to an independent
arbitrator selected by the Trustees of
each Fund involved in the loan who
will serve as arbitrator of disputes
concerning Interfund Loans.2 The
arbitrator will resolve any problem
promptly, and the arbitrator’s decision
will be binding on both Funds. The
arbitrator will submit, at least annually,
a written report to the Trustees setting
forth a description of the nature of any
dispute and the actions taken by the
Funds to resolve the dispute.
16. Each Fund will maintain and
preserve for a period of not less than six
years from the end of the fiscal year in
which any transaction by it under the
proposed credit facility occurred, the
first two years in an easily accessible
place, written records of all such
transactions setting forth a description
2 If the dispute involves Funds with different
Trustees, the respective Trustees of each Fund will
select an independent arbitrator that is satisfactory
to each Fund.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Mar 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the terms of the transactions by the
Fund, including the amount, the
maturity and the Interfund Loan Rate,
the rate of interest available at the time
each Interfund Loan is made on
overnight repurchase agreements and
commercial bank borrowings, the yield
of any money market fund in which the
lending Fund could otherwise invest,
and such other information presented to
the Fund Trustees in connection with
the review required by conditions 13
and 14.
17. The relevant Adviser will prepare
and submit to the Trustees for review an
initial report describing the operations
of the proposed credit facility and the
procedures to be implemented to ensure
that all Funds are treated fairly. After
the commencement of the proposed
credit facility, the relevant Adviser will
report on the operations of the proposed
credit facility at each of the Trustees’
quarterly meetings.
Each Fund’s chief compliance officer,
as defined in rule 38a–1(a)(4) under the
Act, shall prepare an annual report for
its Trustees each year that the Fund
participates in the proposed credit
facility, that evaluates the Fund’s
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the application and the
procedures established to achieve such
compliance. Each Fund’s chief
compliance officer will also annually
file a certification pursuant to Item
77Q3 of Form N–SAR as such Form may
be revised, amended or superseded from
time to time, for each year that the Fund
participates in the proposed credit
facility, that certifies that the Fund and
its Adviser have established procedures
reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the order. In particular,
such certification will address
procedures designed to achieve the
following objectives:
(a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will
be higher than the Repo Rate and, if
applicable, the yield of the money
market funds, but lower than the Bank
Loan Rate;
(b) compliance with the collateral
requirements as set forth in the
application;
(c) compliance with the percentage
limitations on interfund borrowing and
lending;
(d) allocation of interfund borrowing
and lending demand in an equitable
manner and in accordance with
procedures established by the Trustees;
and
(e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does
not exceed the interest rate on any third
party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at
the time of the Interfund Loan.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18679
Additionally, each Fund’s
independent public accountants, in
connection with their audit examination
of the Fund, will review the operation
of the proposed credit facility for
compliance with the conditions of the
application and their review will form
the basis, in part, of the auditor’s report
on internal accounting controls in Form
N–SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
proposed credit facility upon receipt of
requisite regulatory approval unless it
has fully disclosed in its prospectus
and/or statement of additional
information all material facts about its
intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–07193 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Interest Rates
The Small Business Administration
publishes an interest rate called the
optional ‘‘peg’’ rate (13 CFR 120.214) on
a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted
average cost of money to the
government for maturities similar to the
average SBA direct loan. This rate may
be used as a base rate for guaranteed
fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This
rate will be 2.25 percent for the April–
June quarter of FY 2016.
Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the
maximum legal interest rate for any
third party lender’s commercial loan
which funds any portion of the cost of
a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall
be 6% over the New York Prime rate or,
if that exceeds the maximum interest
rate permitted by the constitution or
laws of a given State, the maximum
interest rate will be the rate permitted
by the constitution or laws of the given
State.
Dianna L. Seaborn,
Acting Director, Office of Financial
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–07313 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Annual Meeting of the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards
Office of the National Ombudsman
U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18674-18679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07193]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 32049; File No. 812-14384]
AMCAP Fund, et al.; Notice of Application
March 24, 2016.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to section 6(c)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') granting an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; pursuant to section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of
the Act; pursuant to sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and
pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to
permit certain joint arrangements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of the Application: Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered open-end management investment companies to
participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility.
Applicants: AMCAP Fund; American Balanced Fund; American Funds College
Target Date Series; American Funds Corporate Bond Fund; American Funds
Developing World Growth and Income Fund; American Funds Emerging
Markets Bond Fund; American Funds Fundamental Investors; American Funds
Global Balanced Fund; American Funds Global High-Income Opportunities
Fund; The American Funds Income Series; American Funds Inflation Linked
Bond Fund; American Funds Insurance Series; American Funds Money Market
Fund; American Funds Mortgage Fund; American Funds Portfolio Series;
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio Series; American Funds
Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund; American Funds Strategic Bond Fund;
American Funds Target Date Retirement Series; American Funds Tax-Exempt
Fund of New York; The American Funds Tax-Exempt Series I; The American
Funds Tax-Exempt Series II; American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund;
American High-Income Trust; American Mutual Fund; The Bond Fund of
America; Capital Group Emerging Markets Total Opportunities Fund;
Capital Group Private Client Services Funds; Capital Income Builder;
Capital World Bond Fund; Capital World Growth and Income Fund;
EuroPacific Growth Fund; The Growth Fund of America; The Income Fund of
America; Intermediate Bond Fund of America; International Growth and
Income Fund; The Investment Company of America; Limited Term Tax-Exempt
Bond Fund of America; The New Economy Fund; New Perspective Fund; New
World Fund, Inc.; Short-Term Bond Fund of America; SMALLCAP World Fund,
Inc.; The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America; Washington Mutual Investors
Fund (each, a ``Fund'' and together, the ``Funds''); Capital Research
and Management Company (``CRMC''); and Capital Guardian Trust Company
(``CGTC'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 30, 2014, and
amended on March 3, 2015, August 17, 2015, February 4, 2016, and March
22, 2016.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on April 18, 2016, and should be accompanied by proof of service
on applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
[[Page 18675]]
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Brent J. Fields, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants:
Capital Research and Management Company, 333 South Hope Street, 33rd
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura J. Riegel, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6873 or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. Each Fund is organized as a Maryland corporation, Massachusetts
business trust or Delaware statutory trust and is registered with the
Commission as an open-end management investment company. Each Fund
consists of one or more multiple series and each such series is
included in the term ``Fund.'' American Funds Money Market Fund and
American Funds Insurance Series--Cash Management Fund each operate as a
money market fund in reliance on rule 2a-7 under the Act (together with
any future Fund that relies on rule 2a-7, the ``Money Market Funds'').
CRMC is a Delaware corporation and CGTC is a California corporation and
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CRMC. CRMC and CGTC are each
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940 (``Advisers Act'').\1\ CRMC or CGTC currently serves as the
investment adviser to the Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants request that the relief also apply to any
existing or future series of the Funds and to any other registered
open-end management investment company or series thereof advised by
CRMC, CGTC, or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the CRMC or GCTC (each such entity, an
``Adviser'') that currently, or in the future, is part of the same
``group of investment companies'' as the Funds, as defined in
section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act (included in the term ``Funds'').
All entities that currently intend to rely on the requested order
have been named as applicants. Any other entity that relies on the
requested order in the future will comply with the terms and
conditions set forth in the application. Any other Adviser will be
registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. All
references to the term ``Adviser'' include successors-in-interest to
an Adviser. Successors-in-interest are limited to any entity
resulting from a reorganization of the Adviser into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. At any particular time, while some Funds enter into repurchase
agreements, or invest their cash balances in money market funds or
other short-term instruments, other Funds may need to borrow money for
temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ``fail'' in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other
temporary purposes. Under existing custody agreements, each Fund's
custodian bank may advance money to the Fund which will be treated as a
loan payable upon demand and bear interest at a rate customarily
charged by the bank. These loans are available at the custodian bank's
discretion, in the amounts the custodian bank chooses to make available
at the time, because they are uncommitted.
3. If a Fund borrows from its custodian bank, the Fund generally
would pay interest on the loan at a rate that is significantly higher
than the rate that is earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds on
investments in repurchase agreements, money market funds, and other
short-term instruments of the same maturity as the bank loan.
Applicants assert that this differential represents the profit earned
by the lender on loans and is not attributable to any material
difference in the credit quality or risk of such transactions.
4. The Funds seek to enter into master interfund lending agreements
(``Interfund Lending Agreements'') with each other that would permit
each Fund to lend money directly to and borrow directly from other
Funds through a credit facility for temporary purposes (an ``Interfund
Loan''). The Money Market Funds will not participate as borrowers in
the interfund lending facility. Applicants state that the proposed
credit facility is expected to both reduce the Funds' potential
borrowing costs and enhance the ability of the lending Funds to earn
higher rates of interest on their short-term lendings. Although the
proposed credit facility would reduce the Funds' need to borrow from
banks, the Funds would be free to establish and maintain committed
lines of credit or other borrowing arrangements with unaffiliated
banks.
5. Applicants anticipate that the proposed credit facility would
provide a borrowing Fund with savings at times when the cash position
of the borrowing Fund is insufficient to meet temporary cash
requirements. This situation could arise when shareholder redemptions
exceed anticipated volumes and certain Funds have insufficient cash on
hand to satisfy such redemptions. When the Funds liquidate portfolio
securities to meet redemption requests, they often do not receive
payment in settlement for up to three days (or longer for certain
foreign transactions). However, redemption requests normally are
effected immediately. The proposed credit facility would provide a
source of immediate, short-term liquidity pending settlement of the
sale of portfolio securities.
6. Applicants also anticipate that a Fund could use the proposed
credit facility when a sale of securities ``fails'' due to
circumstances beyond the Fund's control, such as a delay in the
delivery of cash to the Fund's custodian or improper delivery
instructions by the broker effecting the transaction. ``Sales fails''
may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to purchase a
security using the proceeds from securities sold. Alternatively, the
Fund could ``fail'' on its intended purchase due to lack of funds from
the previous sale, resulting in additional cost to the Fund. Use of the
proposed credit facility under these circumstances would enable the
Fund to have access to immediate short-term liquidity.
7. While bank borrowings generally could supply needed cash to
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the proposed
credit facility, a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than
those that would be payable under short-term loans offered by banks. In
addition, Funds making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds
would earn interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain
from investing their cash in repurchase agreements or money market
funds. Thus, applicants assert that the proposed credit facility would
benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate to be charged to the Funds on any Interfund
Loan (the ``Interfund Loan Rate'') would be the average of the ``Repo
Rate'' and the ``Bank Loan Rate,'' both as defined below. The Repo Rate
for any day would be the highest or best (after giving effect to
factors such as the credit quality of the counterparty) rate available
to a lending Fund from investment in overnight repurchase agreements
with counterparties approved by the Fund or its Adviser. The Bank Loan
Rate for any
[[Page 18676]]
day would be calculated by the Interfund Lending Committee, as defined
below, each day an Interfund Loan is made according to a formula
established by each Fund's board of directors or trustees, as
applicable (the ``Trustees'') intended to approximate the lowest
interest rate at which bank short-term loans would be available to the
Funds. The formula would be based upon a publicly available rate (e.g.,
Federal funds plus 25 basis points) and would vary with this rate so as
to reflect changing bank loan rates. The initial formula and any
subsequent modifications to the formula would be subject to the
approval of each Fund's Trustees. In addition, each Fund's Trustees
would periodically review the continuing appropriateness of using the
formula to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the relationship
between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates that would be
available to the Funds.
9. Certain members of the relevant Adviser's fund administration
personnel and portfolio managers of the Money Market Funds (the ``Money
Market portfolio managers'' and together with certain members of the
Adviser's fund administration personnel, the ``Interfund Lending
Committee'') will administer the credit facility. No portfolio manager
of any Fund (other than a Money Market portfolio manager) will serve as
a member of the Interfund Lending Committee. On any day on which a Fund
intends to borrow money, the Interfund Lending Committee would make an
Interfund Loan from a lending Fund to a borrowing Fund only if the
Interfund Loan Rate is: (i) More favorable to the lending Fund than the
Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of any money market fund in
which the lending Fund could otherwise invest, and (ii) more favorable
to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
10. Under the proposed credit facility, the principal investment
officer(s) (the ``PIO(s)'') for each participating Fund could provide
standing instructions to participate daily as a borrower or lender;
alternatively, the PIO(s) could provide instructions from time to time
as to when the Fund wishes to participate as a borrower or lender. The
Interfund Lending Committee on each business day would collect data on
the uninvested cash and borrowing requirements of all participating
Funds. Once it had determined the aggregate amount of cash available
for loans and borrowing demand, the Interfund Lending Committee would
allocate loans among borrowing Funds without any further communication
from the portfolio managers of the Funds (other than a Money Market
portfolio manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of the
Interfund Lending Committee). All allocations made by the Interfund
Lending Committee will require the approval of at least one member of
the Interfund Lending Committee who has the title of Vice President or
higher in any business unit of the relevant Adviser and is not a Money
Market portfolio manager. Applicants anticipate that there typically
will be far more available uninvested cash each day than borrowing
demand. Therefore, after the Interfund Lending Committee has allocated
cash for Interfund Loans, the Interfund Lending Committee will invest
any remaining cash in accordance with the standing instructions of the
portfolio managers or such remaining amounts will be invested directly
by the portfolio managers of the Funds.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee would allocate borrowing demand
and cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Interfund
Lending Committee believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain
administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of
filing requests to participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and the need to
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each loan normally would be
allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of participants
necessary to complete the loan transaction. The method of allocation
and related administrative procedures would be approved by each Fund's
Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are not ``interested
persons'' of the Fund, as that term is defined in section 2(a)(19) of
the Act (``Independent Trustees''), to ensure that both borrowing and
lending Funds participate on an equitable basis.
12. The relevant Adviser would: (i) Monitor the Interfund Loan Rate
and the other terms and conditions of the loans; (ii) limit the
borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that they
comply with the Fund's investment policies and limitations; (iii)
ensure equitable treatment of each Fund; and (iv) make quarterly
reports to the Trustees concerning any transactions by the Funds under
the proposed credit facility and the Interfund Loan Rate charged.
13. The relevant Adviser, through the Interfund Lending Committee,
would administer the proposed credit facility as a disinterested
fiduciary as part of its duties under the investment management
contract with each Fund and would receive no additional fee as
compensation for its services in connection with the administration of
the proposed credit facility. The relevant Adviser may collect standard
pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping and accounting fees associated
with the transfer of cash and/or securities in connection with
repurchase and lending transactions generally, including transactions
effected through the proposed credit facility. Such fees would be no
higher than those applicable for comparable bank loan transactions.
14. No Fund may participate in the proposed credit facility unless:
(i) The Fund has obtained shareholder approval for its participation,
if such approval is required by law; (ii) the Fund has fully disclosed
all material information concerning the credit facility in its
prospectus and/or statement of additional information; and (iii) the
Fund's participation in the credit facility is consistent with its
investment objectives and limitations and organizational documents.
15. As part of the Trustees' review of the continuing
appropriateness of a Fund's participation in the proposed credit
facility as required by condition 14, the Trustees of the Fund,
including a majority of the Independent Trustees, also will review the
process in place to appropriately assess: (i) If the Fund participates
as a lender, any effect its participation may have on the Fund's
liquidity risk; and (ii) if the Fund participates as a borrower,
whether the Fund's portfolio liquidity is sufficient to satisfy its
obligations under the facility along with its other liquidity needs.
16. In connection with the credit facility, applicants request an
order under section 6(c) of the Act exempting them from the provisions
of sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act exempting them from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under sections
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act exempting them from sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and under section 17(d) of the Act
and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or affiliated person of an
affiliated person, from borrowing money or other property from the
registered investment company. Section 21(b) of the Act generally
prohibits any registered management company from lending money or other
property to any person, directly or indirectly, if that person controls
or is under common control
[[Page 18677]]
with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act defines an
``affiliated person'' of another person, in part, to be any person
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act defines
``control'' as the ``power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company,'' but excludes circumstances in
which ``such power is solely the result of an official position with
such company.'' Applicants state that the Funds may be under common
control by virtue of sharing a common investment adviser or by having
an investment adviser that is under common control with those of the
other Funds.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be
granted where an exemption is ``necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of [the Act].''
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are
fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any
person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy of
the investment company as recited in its registration statement and
with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the
proposed arrangements satisfy these standards for the reasons discussed
below.
3. Applicants assert that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act
were intended to prevent a party with strong potential adverse
interests to, and some influence over the investment decisions of, a
registered investment company from causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of such party and that are detrimental to the best interests of
the investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do not raise these concerns
because: (i) The relevant Adviser, through the Interfund Lending
Committee, would administer the program as a disinterested fiduciary as
part of its duties under the investment management contract with the
applicable Fund; (ii) all Interfund Loans would consist only of
uninvested cash reserves that the lending Fund otherwise would invest
in short-term repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments
either directly or through a money market fund; (iii) the Interfund
Loans would not involve a significantly greater risk than such other
investments; (iv) the lending Fund would receive interest at a rate
higher than it could otherwise obtain through such other investments;
and (v) the borrowing Fund would pay interest at a rate lower than
otherwise available to it under its bank loan agreements and avoid some
up-front commitment fees associated with committed lines of credit.
Moreover, applicants assert that the other terms and conditions that
applicants propose also would effectively preclude the possibility of
any Fund obtaining an undue advantage over any other Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of
such a person, from selling securities or other property to the
investment company. Section 17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an
affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated
person of such a person, from purchasing securities or other property
from the investment company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits a registered investment company from purchasing or otherwise
acquiring any security issued by any other investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth in that section.
5. Applicants state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to
repay an Interfund Loan could be deemed to constitute a security for
the purposes of sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1). Applicants also state
that any pledge of assets in connection with an Interfund Loan could be
construed as a purchase of the borrowing Fund's securities or other
property for purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act. Section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt persons
or transactions from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the
extent that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants submit that the requested
exemptions from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 12(d)(1) are
appropriate in the public interest, and consistent with the protection
of investors and policies and purposes of the Act for all the reasons
set forth above in support of their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b). Applicants also state that the requested relief
from section 17(a)(2) of the Act meets the standards of section 6(c)
and 17(b) because any collateral pledged to secure an Interfund Loan
would be subject to the same conditions imposed by any other lender to
a Fund that imposes conditions on the quality of or access to
collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is another Fund) or the same
or better conditions (in any other circumstance).
6. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was intended to prevent
the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid imposing on
investors additional and duplicative costs and fees attendant upon
multiple layers of investments. Applicants submit that the proposed
credit facility does not involve these abuses. Applicants note that
there will be no duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or their
shareholders, and that the Adviser will receive no additional
compensation for its services in administering the credit facility.
Applicants also note that the purpose of the proposed credit facility
is to provide economic benefits for all the participating Funds and
their shareholders.
7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment
companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is
permitted to borrow from any bank, provided, that immediately after the
borrowing, there is asset coverage of at least 300 per centum for all
borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term
``senior security'' generally includes any bond, debenture, note or
similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing
indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief under section 6(c)
from section 18(f)(1) only to the limited extent necessary to permit a
Fund to lend to or borrow directly from other Funds. The Funds would
remain subject to the requirement of section 18(f)(1) that all
borrowings of a Fund, including combined interfund and bank borrowings,
have at least 300% asset coverage. Based on the conditions and
safeguards described in the application, applicants submit that to
allow the Funds to borrow directly from other Funds pursuant to the
proposed credit facility is consistent with the purposes and policies
of section 18(f)(1).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act generally
prohibit an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or
any affiliated person of such a person, when acting as principal, from
effecting any joint transaction in which the investment company
participates, unless, upon application, the transaction has been
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d-1(b) under the Act provides that
in passing upon an application filed under the rule, the Commission
will consider whether the participation of the registered investment
company in a joint enterprise on the basis proposed is consistent with
the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and the extent
[[Page 18678]]
to which such participation is on a basis different from or less
advantageous than that of the other participants.
9. Applicants assert that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid
overreaching by and unfair advantage to insiders. Applicants assert
that the proposed credit facility is consistent with the provisions,
policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both reduced
borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each
Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms
consistent with its investment policies and fundamental investment
limitations. Applicants assert that each Fund's participation in the
proposed credit facility would be on terms that are no different from
or less advantageous than that of other participating Funds.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the average of the Repo Rate and
the Bank Loan Rate.
2. On each business day, when an Interfund Loan is to be made, the
Interfund Lending Committee will compare the Bank Loan Rate with the
Repo Rate and will make cash available for Interfund Loans only if the
Interfund Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable to the lending Fund than the
Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of any money market fund in
which the lending Fund could otherwise invest; and (b) more favorable
to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding bank borrowings, any Interfund Loans
to the Fund: (a) Will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than the
interest rate of any outstanding bank loan to the Fund; (b) will be
secured at least on an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent
percentage of collateral to loan value as any outstanding bank loan to
the Fund that requires collateral; (c) will have a maturity no longer
than any outstanding bank loan to the Fund (and in any event not over
seven days); and (d) will provide that, if an event of default by the
Fund occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank loan to
the Fund, that event of default will automatically (without need for
action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate event of
default under the Interfund Lending Agreement entitling the lending
Fund to call the Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights with respect
to any collateral) and that such call will be made if the lending bank
exercises its right to call its loan under its agreement with the
borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the proposed
credit facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources
immediately after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its
total assets, provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding
from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the
Fund's interfund borrowing will be secured on at least an equal
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a
Fund's total outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund
borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may
borrow through the proposed credit facility only on a secured basis. A
Fund may not borrow through the proposed credit facility or from any
other source if its total outstanding borrowings immediately after such
borrowing would be more than 33\1/3\% of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from
all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated
collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding
borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceed 10% of its
total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset value
or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of its outstanding Interfund
Loans; (b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its
total assets; or (c) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the
pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to
102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund's
total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets,
at which time the collateral called for by this condition 5 shall no
longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings exceed 10% is
repaid or the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10%
of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to
market each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value of the collateral that secures
each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the proposed credit
facility if the loan would cause the lending Fund's aggregate
outstanding loans through the proposed credit facility to exceed 15% of
the lending Fund's current net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of
the lending Fund's net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time
required to obtain cash sufficient to repay such Interfund Loan,
through either the sale of portfolio securities or the net sales of the
Fund's shares, but in no event more than seven days. Loans effected
within seven days of each other will be treated as separate loan
transactions for purposes of this condition.
9. A Fund's borrowings through the proposed credit facility, as
measured on the day when the most recent loan was made, will not exceed
the greater of 125% of the Fund's total net cash redemptions for the
preceding seven calendar days or 102% of the Fund's sales fails for the
preceding seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice
by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund's participation in the proposed credit facility must be
consistent with its investment objectives and limitations and
organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee will calculate total Fund
borrowing and lending demand through the proposed credit facility, and
allocate loans on an equitable basis among the Funds, without the
intervention of any portfolio manager of the Funds (other than a Money
Market portfolio manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of
the Interfund Lending Committee). All allocations made by the Interfund
Lending Committee will require the approval of at least one member of
the Interfund Lending Committee who has the title of Vice President or
higher in any business unit of the relevant Adviser and is not a Money
Market portfolio manager. The Interfund Lending Committee will not
solicit cash for the proposed credit facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio
managers (except to the extent that a Money Market portfolio manager on
the Interfund Lending Committee has access to loan demand data). The
Interfund Lending Committee will invest any amounts remaining after
satisfaction of borrowing demand in
[[Page 18679]]
accordance with the standing instructions of the portfolio managers or
such remaining amounts will be invested directly by the portfolio
managers of the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee will monitor the Interfund Loan
Rate and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and will
make a quarterly report to the Trustees of each Fund concerning the
participation of the Funds in the proposed credit facility and the
terms and other conditions of any extensions of credit under the credit
facility.
14. The Trustees of each Fund, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees, will:
(a) Review, no less frequently than quarterly, the Fund's
participation in the proposed credit facility during the preceding
quarter for compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such
transactions;
(b) establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to determine the
interest rate on Interfund Loans and review, no less frequently than
annually, the continuing appropriateness of the Bank Loan Rate formula;
and
(c) review, no less frequently than annually, the continuing
appropriateness of the Fund's participation in the proposed credit
facility.
15. If an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its terms and
such default is not cured within two business days from its maturity or
from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment under the
provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Adviser will
promptly refer such loan for arbitration to an independent arbitrator
selected by the Trustees of each Fund involved in the loan who will
serve as arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund Loans.\2\ The
arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly, and the arbitrator's
decision will be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator will submit, at
least annually, a written report to the Trustees setting forth a
description of the nature of any dispute and the actions taken by the
Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If the dispute involves Funds with different Trustees, the
respective Trustees of each Fund will select an independent
arbitrator that is satisfactory to each Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction
by it under the proposed credit facility occurred, the first two years
in an easily accessible place, written records of all such transactions
setting forth a description of the terms of the transactions by the
Fund, including the amount, the maturity and the Interfund Loan Rate,
the rate of interest available at the time each Interfund Loan is made
on overnight repurchase agreements and commercial bank borrowings, the
yield of any money market fund in which the lending Fund could
otherwise invest, and such other information presented to the Fund
Trustees in connection with the review required by conditions 13 and
14.
17. The relevant Adviser will prepare and submit to the Trustees
for review an initial report describing the operations of the proposed
credit facility and the procedures to be implemented to ensure that all
Funds are treated fairly. After the commencement of the proposed credit
facility, the relevant Adviser will report on the operations of the
proposed credit facility at each of the Trustees' quarterly meetings.
Each Fund's chief compliance officer, as defined in rule 38a-
1(a)(4) under the Act, shall prepare an annual report for its Trustees
each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility,
that evaluates the Fund's compliance with the terms and conditions of
the application and the procedures established to achieve such
compliance. Each Fund's chief compliance officer will also annually
file a certification pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form N-SAR as such Form
may be revised, amended or superseded from time to time, for each year
that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, that
certifies that the Fund and its Adviser have established procedures
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions
of the order. In particular, such certification will address procedures
designed to achieve the following objectives:
(a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate
and, if applicable, the yield of the money market funds, but lower than
the Bank Loan Rate;
(b) compliance with the collateral requirements as set forth in the
application;
(c) compliance with the percentage limitations on interfund
borrowing and lending;
(d) allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an
equitable manner and in accordance with procedures established by the
Trustees; and
(e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does not exceed the interest rate
on any third party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the time of the
Interfund Loan.
Additionally, each Fund's independent public accountants, in
connection with their audit examination of the Fund, will review the
operation of the proposed credit facility for compliance with the
conditions of the application and their review will form the basis, in
part, of the auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form
N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the proposed credit facility upon
receipt of requisite regulatory approval unless it has fully disclosed
in its prospectus and/or statement of additional information all
material facts about its intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07193 Filed 3-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P