Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, 15238-15240 [2016-06425]

Download as PDF 15238 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices VI. Scope Comments VII. All-Others Rate VIII. Discussion of Methodology A. Determination of the Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis C. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences 1. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference 2. Selection of Information Used as Facts Available 3. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA Rate IX. Date of Sale X. Product Comparisons XI. Constructed Export Price XII. Normal Value A. Comparison Market Viability B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of COP 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of NV Based on ComparisonMarket Prices XIII. Currency Conversion XIV. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates For Export Subsidies in the Companion Countervailing Duty Investigation XV. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2016–06449 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–068] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Final Results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order 1 on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013 period of review (POR).2 As explained asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 2 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325, dated December 14, 2015 (Final Results); Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance regarding: ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Countervailing Duty VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 below, the Department is amending the Final Results to correct the net subsidy rates for the Jangho Companies,3 nonselected cooperative respondents, and companies for which we applied total adverse facts available (AFA) in the Final Results. The amended final net subsidy rates are listed below in ‘‘Amended Final Results of Administrative Review.’’ 4 DATES: Effective Date: March 22, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0698, (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 14, 2015, the Department published the Final Results.5 On December 15, 2015, the Jangho Companies alleged that certain ministerial errors were contained in the Final Results, and requested that the Department correct such errors.6 No other party has submitted ministerial error comments or rebuttal comments. Before the Department could take action on the alleged ministerial errors, both Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd. and the Jangho Companies filed a summons and complaint with the U.S. Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) challenging the Final Results, which vested the CIT with jurisdiction over the administrative proceeding.7 On Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China, 2013 (Third Review),’’ December 7, 2015 (Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 For purposes of this administrative review, the Jangho Companies includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd., (Guangzhou Jangho); Jangho Group Co., Ltd. (Jangho Group Co.); Beijing Jiangheyuan Holding Co., Ltd (Beijing Jiangheyuan); Beijing Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. (Beijing Jangho); and Shanghai Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd., (Shanghai Jangho). 4 On December 17, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum correcting certain inadvertent errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. See Memorandum to the File from Tyler Weinhold: ‘‘Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative Review,’’ December 17, 2015. We hereby incorporate that memorandum by reference in this notice. 5 See Final Results. 6 See letter from the Jangho Companies to the Department regarding: ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Errors,’’ December 15, 2015 (Ministerial Error Allegation). 7 See Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. United States, 884 F.2d 556, 561–62 (Fed. Cir. 1989). PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 February 8 and 12, 2016, the CIT granted the Department leave to publish amended final results upon considering the ministerial error allegations.8 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).9 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 9031.90.90.95, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 8 See Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. v. United States, CIT No. 16–00009; Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. et al v. United States, CIT No. 16–00012. 9 See Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the scope of the Order. E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50 The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive. Amendment to Rates for Non-Selected Companies Under Review In light of the above corrections, for the 38 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory respondents, we have recalculated the net subsidy rate which is based on the overall subsidy rates calculated for the mandatory respondents of this review.11 We have also recalculated the net subsidy rate assigned to those companies for which we applied AFA in the Final Results because the AFA rate includes the individual subsidy rates determined for the glass for LTAR and aluminum extrusions for LTAR programs.12 Amended Final Results of Administrative Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e) we determine the following amended final net subsidy rates for the 2013 administrative review: Correction to the Final Results Company asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As discussed in the memoranda accompanying this notice, and which are hereby adopted by this notice, we determine that the Final Results contained two ministerial errors.10 First, in Guangzhou Jangho’s glass for less than adequate remuneration (LTAR) purchases and benefits spreadsheet, we inadvertently referenced the wrong column in the transaction-specific benefits formulas for Guangzhou Jangho’s glass purchases. We have corrected this error by modifying the relevant formula to refer to the correct column. Second, in Shanghai Jangho’s aluminum extrusions for LTAR purchases and benefits spreadsheet, the formulas used to reference monthly aluminum extrusions benchmark prices were returning the value for the wrong month in certain instances, and in some instances we had used incorrect formulas. We have corrected these errors. 10 See Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold and Davina Friedmann, through Robert James, program Manager, Office VI, to Scot Fullerton, Director, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Results Decision Memorandum), and Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold through Robert James, Program Manager, Office VI, to the File, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results Analysis Memorandum for the Jangho Companies,’’ dated concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Analysis Memorandum for the Jangho Companies). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 Ad Valorem rate 13 (percent) Allied Maker Limited ............. Alnan Aluminum Co. Ltd ...... Bracalente Metal Producers (Suzhou) Co. Ltd 14 ........... Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd ........... Classic & Contemporary Inc. Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co. Ltd ..................................... Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd ..................................... Dynamic Technologies China Ltd ..................................... Ever Extend Ent. Ltd ............ Fenghua Metal Product Factory .................................... Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High Tech Industrial Development Zone ..... 11 For 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 187.86 28.01 28.01 187.86 further information see Memorandum from Davina Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Non-Selected Rate Calculation Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with these amended final results of review. 12 For further information see Memorandum from Davina Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: ‘‘Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: AFA Calculation Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with these amended final results of review. 13 Because the net subsidy rate for the Guang Ya Group did not change as a result of these amended final results, their net subsidy rate remains the same as was published in the Final Results. See Final Results, 80 FR 77325, 77327. 14 In the Final Results, the Department misspelled the name of this company. This error has been corrected for these amended final results of review. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Company Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd ..................................... Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group ................ Guandong JMA Aluminum Profile (Group) Co., Ltd .... Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd ... Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited .. Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd ..... Hangyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd ............................. Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances, Co., Ltd .......... IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd ............... IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd ............................. Jangho Companies ............... Jiangsu Susun Group (HK) Co., Ltd ............................. Justhere Co., Ltd .................. Kromet International Inc. ...... Metaltek Group Co. Ltd ........ North Fenghua Aluminum Limited ............................... Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd .............................. Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd ...................... Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd ..................................... Permasteelisa South China Factory .............................. Sapa Profiles (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd ................... Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd ..................................... Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co., Ltd Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd ............................... tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ..................................... Union Industry (Asia) Co., Limited ............................... Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd ....... WTI Building Products, Ltd ... Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd ....... Zhejiang Dongfeng Refrigeration Components Co. Ltd ..................................... Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited ......... Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd ............................. Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd ................. 15239 Ad Valorem rate 13 (percent) 187.86 187.86 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 29.18 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 187.86 187.86 28.01 28.01 28.01 28.01 Assessment Rates The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these amended final results of review, to liquidate appropriate shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, at the ad valorem rates listed above. E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 15240 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated above for each company listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after December 14, 2015, the date of publication of the Final Results. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. We will disclose the calculations performed for these amended final results to interested parties within five business days of the date of publication of this notice. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(h), and 777(i)(1) of the Act; and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (h). DATES: Effective: March 22, 2016. Cara Lofaro or Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5720 and (202) 482–0182, respectively. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background International Trade Administration On August 27, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on xanthan gum from the PRC.1 The Department subsequently issued an antidumping duty questionnaire, and supplemental questionnaires, to IMJ and received timely responses thereto. Also, interested parties submitted comments on surrogate country and surrogate value selection. The Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government because of Snowstorm ‘‘Jonas.’’ Thus, all of the deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review, after the four business-day extension, was February 23, 2016.2 However, on February 17, 2016, the Department extended the time period for issuing the preliminary results of this NSR by 21 days, until March 15, 2016.3 [A–570–985] Scope of the Order Dated: March 15, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–06425 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2014–2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order on xanthan gum from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The NSR covers one exporter and producer of subject merchandise, Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘IMJ’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015. The Department preliminarily determines that IMJ did not satisfy the regulatory requirements to request an NSR and did not make a bona fide sale during the POR; therefore, we are preliminarily rescinding this NSR. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 The scope of the order covers dry xanthan gum, whether or not coated or blended with other products. Further, xanthan gum is included in this order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground fiber. Merchandise covered by the scope of this order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTS’’) of the United States at subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff 1 See Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 80 FR 52031 (August 27, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016. 3 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘New Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,’’ dated February 17, 2016. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive.4 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and is available in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping New Shipper Review of IMJ As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales Analysis Memorandum,5 the Department preliminarily finds that the sale made by IMJ’s affiliate in the United States, Jianlong USA, is not a bona fide sale. The Department reached this conclusion based on the totality of the circumstances surrounding the reported sale, including the sales price, in conjunction with the timing of the sale and the facts surrounding the establishment and operations of IMJ’s U.S. affiliate, Jianlong USA. Because the 4 For a complete description of the scope of the order, see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Rescission of the 2014–2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with this notice. 5 See Memorandum from Cara Lofaro and Brandon Farlander, International Trade Analysts, Office IV AD/CVD Operations, to Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ‘‘2014–2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Bona Fide Sales Analysis Memorandum’’). E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15238-15240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-068]


Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Amended 
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 14, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the Final Results of the administrative review of 
the countervailing duty (CVD) order \1\ on aluminum extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2013, through 
December 31, 2013 period of review (POR).\2\ As explained below, the 
Department is amending the Final Results to correct the net subsidy 
rates for the Jangho Companies,\3\ non-selected cooperative 
respondents, and companies for which we applied total adverse facts 
available (AFA) in the Final Results. The amended final net subsidy 
rates are listed below in ``Amended Final Results of Administrative 
Review.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order).
    \2\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325, dated December 14, 2015 
(Final Results); Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul 
Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance 
regarding: ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from 
the People's Republic of China, 2013 (Third Review),'' December 7, 
2015 (Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum).
    \3\ For purposes of this administrative review, the Jangho 
Companies includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 
Co., Ltd., (Guangzhou Jangho); Jangho Group Co., Ltd. (Jangho Group 
Co.); Beijing Jiangheyuan Holding Co., Ltd (Beijing Jiangheyuan); 
Beijing Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. (Beijing 
Jangho); and Shanghai Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., 
Ltd., (Shanghai Jangho).
    \4\ On December 17, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum 
correcting certain inadvertent errors in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. See Memorandum to the File from Tyler Weinhold: 
``Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's 
Republic of China: Errors in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative Review,'' December 17, 
2015. We hereby incorporate that memorandum by reference in this 
notice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 22, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or 
Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-0698, (202) 482-1121 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 14, 2015, the Department published the Final 
Results.\5\ On December 15, 2015, the Jangho Companies alleged that 
certain ministerial errors were contained in the Final Results, and 
requested that the Department correct such errors.\6\ No other party 
has submitted ministerial error comments or rebuttal comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Results.
    \6\ See letter from the Jangho Companies to the Department 
regarding: ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of 
China: Ministerial Errors,'' December 15, 2015 (Ministerial Error 
Allegation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Before the Department could take action on the alleged ministerial 
errors, both Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd. and the Jangho Companies 
filed a summons and complaint with the U.S. Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') challenging the Final Results, which vested the CIT 
with jurisdiction over the administrative proceeding.\7\ On February 8 
and 12, 2016, the CIT granted the Department leave to publish amended 
final results upon considering the ministerial error allegations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. United States, 884 F.2d 556, 561-
62 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
    \8\ See Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. v. United States, 
CIT No. 16-00009; Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 
Co., Ltd. et al v. United States, CIT No. 16-00012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which 
are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from 
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy 
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing 
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other 
certifying body equivalents).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Final Results Issues and Decision Memorandum for a 
complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the 
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS): 9031.90.90.95, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 
8306.30.00.00, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 
8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 
8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 
9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 
9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 
9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30, 
9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61,

[[Page 15239]]

9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 
9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 
9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 
9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 
9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 
9603.90.80.50
    The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products 
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as 
under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be 
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. 
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is 
dispositive.

Correction to the Final Results

    As discussed in the memoranda accompanying this notice, and which 
are hereby adopted by this notice, we determine that the Final Results 
contained two ministerial errors.\10\ First, in Guangzhou Jangho's 
glass for less than adequate remuneration (LTAR) purchases and benefits 
spreadsheet, we inadvertently referenced the wrong column in the 
transaction-specific benefits formulas for Guangzhou Jangho's glass 
purchases. We have corrected this error by modifying the relevant 
formula to refer to the correct column. Second, in Shanghai Jangho's 
aluminum extrusions for LTAR purchases and benefits spreadsheet, the 
formulas used to reference monthly aluminum extrusions benchmark prices 
were returning the value for the wrong month in certain instances, and 
in some instances we had used incorrect formulas. We have corrected 
these errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold and Davina Friedmann, 
through Robert James, program Manager, Office VI, to Scot Fullerton, 
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, regarding: ``Administrative 
Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Results Decision 
Memorandum), and Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold through Robert 
James, Program Manager, Office VI, to the File, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final 
Results Analysis Memorandum for the Jangho Companies,'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Amended Final Analysis Memorandum 
for the Jangho Companies).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment to Rates for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    In light of the above corrections, for the 38 companies for which a 
review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as 
mandatory respondents, we have recalculated the net subsidy rate which 
is based on the overall subsidy rates calculated for the mandatory 
respondents of this review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For further information see Memorandum from Davina 
Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, 
Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Non-Selected Rate 
Calculation Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,'' dated 
concurrently with these amended final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have also recalculated the net subsidy rate assigned to those 
companies for which we applied AFA in the Final Results because the AFA 
rate includes the individual subsidy rates determined for the glass for 
LTAR and aluminum extrusions for LTAR programs.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For further information see Memorandum from Davina 
Friedmann and Tyler Weinhold, Case Analysts, to Robert James, 
Program Manager, Office VI, AD/CVD Operations, regarding: 
``Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: AFA Calculation 
Memorandum for the Amended Final Results,'' dated concurrently with 
these amended final results of review.
    \13\ Because the net subsidy rate for the Guang Ya Group did not 
change as a result of these amended final results, their net subsidy 
rate remains the same as was published in the Final Results. See 
Final Results, 80 FR 77325, 77327.
    \14\ In the Final Results, the Department misspelled the name of 
this company. This error has been corrected for these amended final 
results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of Administrative Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e) we determine the following 
amended final net subsidy rates for the 2013 administrative review:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Ad Valorem
                         Company                             rate \13\
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allied Maker Limited....................................           28.01
Alnan Aluminum Co. Ltd..................................           28.01
Bracalente Metal Producers (Suzhou) Co. Ltd \14\........           28.01
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd................           28.01
Classic & Contemporary Inc..............................           28.01
Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co. Ltd.           28.01
Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd......           28.01
Dynamic Technologies China Ltd..........................          187.86
Ever Extend Ent. Ltd....................................           28.01
Fenghua Metal Product Factory...........................           28.01
Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High Tech Industrial            187.86
 Development Zone.......................................
Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.....          187.86
Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group.................          187.86
Guandong JMA Aluminum Profile (Group) Co., Ltd..........           28.01
Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd.......           28.01
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited..............           28.01
Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd................................           28.01
Hangyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd........................           28.01
Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances, Co., Ltd........           28.01
IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd..............           28.01
IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd.........................           28.01
Jangho Companies........................................           29.18
Jiangsu Susun Group (HK) Co., Ltd.......................           28.01
Justhere Co., Ltd.......................................           28.01
Kromet International Inc................................           28.01
Metaltek Group Co. Ltd..................................           28.01
North Fenghua Aluminum Limited..........................           28.01
Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.........................           28.01
Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd................           28.01
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd.............................           28.01
Permasteelisa South China Factory.......................           28.01
Sapa Profiles (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.......................           28.01
Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing              28.01
 Co., Ltd...............................................
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd..           28.01
Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co., Ltd........           28.01
Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd.........................           28.01
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd...........................           28.01
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Limited......................           28.01
Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd............           28.01
WTI Building Products, Ltd..............................          187.86
Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd..............          187.86
Zhejiang Dongfeng Refrigeration Components Co. Ltd......           28.01
Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited............           28.01
Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd........................           28.01
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd..................           28.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these amended final 
results of review, to liquidate appropriate shipments of subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, at the ad valorem 
rates listed above.

[[Page 15240]]

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated 
above for each company listed above on shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
December 14, 2015, the date of publication of the Final Results. For 
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect 
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent 
company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as 
appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice. We will disclose the 
calculations performed for these amended final results to interested 
parties within five business days of the date of publication of this 
notice.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1), 751(h), and 777(i)(1) of the Act; and 19 CFR 
351.224(e) and (h).

    Dated: March 15, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-06425 Filed 3-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P