Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 Phase II, 15289-15290 [2016-06316]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices
following language in a new paragraph
following the current paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(ttttt) The title of the analysis section
of Mil. R. Evid. 1006 is changed to
‘‘Summaries to prove content.’’
(uuuuu) The analysis following Mil.
R. Evid. 1006 is amended by adding the
following language after the final
paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(vvvvv) The title of the analysis
section of Mil. R. Evid. 1007 is changed
to ‘‘Testimony or statement of a party to
prove content.’’
(wwwww) The analysis following
Mil. R. Evid. 1007 is amended by adding
the following language in a new
paragraph following the current
paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(xxxxx) The title of the analysis
section of Mil. R. Evid. 1008 is changed
to ‘‘Functions of the military judge and
the members.’’
(yyyyy) The analysis following Mil. R.
Evid. 1008 is amended by adding the
following language in a new paragraph
following the current paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(zzzzz) The title of the analysis
section of Mil. R. Evid. 1101 is changed
to ‘‘Applicability of these rules.’’
(aaaaaa) The analysis following Mil.
R. Evid. 1101 is amended by adding the
following language after the final
paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(bbbbbb) The analysis following Mil.
R. Evid. 1102 is amended by adding the
following language after the final
paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
(cccccc) The analysis following Mil.
R. Evid. 1103 is amended by adding the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
following language in a new paragraph
following the current paragraph:
‘‘2013 Amendment. This revision is
stylistic and aligns this rule with the
Federal Rules of Evidence. The drafters
did not intend to change any result in
any ruling on evidence admissibility.’’
Dated: March 17, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2016–06403 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2015–ICCD–0145]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
National Longitudinal Transition Study
2012 Phase II
Institute of Education Sciences
(IES), Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a reinstatement with change
of a previously approved information
collection.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before April 21,
2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2015–ICCD–0145. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E–105, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Yumiko
Sekino, 202–219–2046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15289
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: National
Longitudinal Transition Study 2012
Phase II.
OMB Control Number: 1850–0882.
Type of Review: A reinstatement with
change of a previously approved
information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 7,252.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 4,448.
Abstract: The National Longitudinal
Transition Study 2012 (NLTS 2012) is
the third in a series of studies being
conducted by the U.S. Department of
Education (ED), with the goal of
describing the characteristics, secondary
school experiences, transition, and
outcomes of youth who receive special
education services under IDEA. Phase II
of NLTS 2012 will utilize high school
and post-high school administrative
records data to collect information in
three broad areas important to
understanding outcomes for youth with
disabilities: (1) High school coursetaking and outcomes, (2) post-secondary
outcomes, and (3) employment and
earnings outcomes. Phase II collected
information will build on a survey of a
nationally representative set of students
with and without IEPs from Phase I of
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15290
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2016 / Notices
the study to address the following
questions:
• To what extent do youth with
disabilities who receive special
education services under IDEA make
progress through high school compared
with other youth, including those
identified for services under Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act? For students
with disabilities, has high school course
taking and completion rates changed
over the past few decades?
• Are youth with disabilities
achieving the post-high school
outcomes envisioned by IDEA, and how
do their college, training, and
employment rates compare with those
of other youth?
• How do these high school and
postsecondary experiences and
outcomes vary by student
characteristics, including their disability
category, age, sex, race/ethnicity,
English Learner status, income status,
and type of high school attended
(including regular public school, charter
school, career/technical school, special
education school, or other State or
Federally-operated institution)?
The NLTS 2012 sample includes
21,959 students ranging in age from 13
to 21 in December 2011. The sample
was selected to include sufficient
number of students in each of the 12
federally defined disability categories,
and adequate number of students
without disabilities, including both
students with a Section 504 plan and
students with neither an IEP nor a
Section 504 plan. To meet the study’s
objective, data will be collected from the
following sources: (1) School district
administrative records, including
transcripts, from districts that
participated in NLTS 2012; (2)
postsecondary enrollment information
through the National Student
Clearinghouse, (3) employment and
earnings data from the Social Security
Administration (SSA); and (4)
information about vocational
rehabilitative services and supports
youth received from the Department’s
Rehabilitative Services Administration
(RSA). Data collection activities
expected to result in public burden are
the collection of administrative data
from school districts and requests for
consent from sample members and their
parents.
Dated: March 16, 2016.
Stephanie Valentine,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Office of the Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2016–06316 Filed 3–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards;
Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation
Research Abroad Fellowship Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information:
Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation
Research Abroad (DDRA) Fellowship
Program.
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2016.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.022A.
Dates:
Applications Available: March 22,
2016.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 6, 2016.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The FulbrightHays DDRA Fellowship Program
provides opportunities to doctoral
candidates to engage in full-time
dissertation research abroad in modern
foreign languages and area studies. The
program is designed to contribute to the
development and improvement of the
study of modern foreign languages and
area studies in the United States.
Priorities: This notice contains one
absolute priority, two competitive
preference priorities, and one
invitational priority. In accordance with
34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(ii), the absolute and
competitive preference priorities are
from the regulations for this program (34
CFR 662.21(d)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2016, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Specific Geographic Regions of the
World.
A research project that focuses on one
or more of the following geographic
areas: Africa, East Asia, Southeast Asia
and the Pacific Islands, South Asia, the
Near East, Central and Eastern Europe
and Eurasia, and the Western
Hemisphere (excluding the United
States and its territories). Please note
that applications that propose projects
focused on the following countries are
not eligible: Andorra, Austria, Belgium,
Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta,
Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
San Marino, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, United Kingdom, or
Vatican City.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Competitive Preference Priorities:
Within this absolute priority, we give
competitive preference to applications
that address one or both of the following
priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), for FY
2016, we award an additional three
points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 1 and
two points for an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2 (up to
5 additional points possible).
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Focus on Priority Languages (3 points).
A research project that makes use of
any of the 78 priority languages selected
from the U.S. Department of Education’s
list of Less Commonly Taught
Languages (LCTLs), as follows:
Akan (Twi-Fante), Albanian,
Amharic, Arabic (all dialects),
Armenian, Azeri (Azerbaijani), Balochi,
Bamanakan (Bamana, Bambara,
Mandikan, Mandingo, Maninka, Dyula),
Belarusian, Bengali (Bangla), Berber (all
languages), Bosnian, Bulgarian,
Burmese, Cebuano (Visayan), Chechen,
Chinese (Cantonese), Chinese (Gan),
Chinese (Mandarin), Chinese (Min),
Chinese (Wu), Croatian, Dari, Dinka,
Georgian, Gujarati, Hausa, Hebrew
(Modern), Hindi, Igbo, Indonesian,
Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kashmiri,
Kazakh, Khmer (Cambodian), Kirghiz,
Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kurdish
(Sorani), Lao, Malay (Bahasa Melayu or
Malaysian), Malayalam, Marathi,
Mongolian, Nepali, Oromo, Panjabi,
Pashto, Persian (Farsi), Polish,
Portuguese (all varieties), Quechua,
Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Sinhala
(Sinhalese), Somali, Swahili, Tagalog,
Tajik, Tamil, Telugu, Thai, Tibetan,
Tigrigna, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian,
Urdu, Uyghur/Uigur, Uzbek,
Vietnamese, Wolof, Xhosa, Yoruba, and
Zulu.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Thematic Focus on Academic Fields (2
points).
A research project conducted in the
field of economics, engineering,
international development,
mathematics, political science, public
health, science, comparative or
international education, or technology.
Invitational Priority: For FY 2016, this
priority is an invitational priority.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), we do not
give an application that meets this
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications.
This priority is:
Applications from Minority-Serving
Institutions. For purposes of this
invitational priority, Minority-Serving
Institution means an institution that is
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15289-15290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06316]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED-2015-ICCD-0145]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 Phase II
AGENCY: Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Department of Education
(ED).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is proposing a reinstatement with
change of a previously approved information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
April 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the documents related to the
information collection listed in this notice, please use https://www.regulations.gov by searching the Docket ID number ED-2015-ICCD-
0145. Comments submitted in response to this notice should be submitted
electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov by selecting the Docket ID number or via postal
mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those submitted after the comment period
will not be accepted. Written requests for information or comments
submitted by postal mail or delivery should be addressed to the
Director of the Information Collection Clearance Division, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room 2E-105,
Washington, DC 20202-4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For specific questions related to
collection activities, please contact Yumiko Sekino, 202-219-2046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with
an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing
collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact
of its information collection requirements and minimize the public's
reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department's
information collection requirements and provide the requested data in
the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that is described below. The
Department of Education is especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to
the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden
accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents,
including through the use of information technology. Please note that
written comments received in response to this notice will be considered
public records.
Title of Collection: National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012
Phase II.
OMB Control Number: 1850-0882.
Type of Review: A reinstatement with change of a previously
approved information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 7,252.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 4,448.
Abstract: The National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (NLTS
2012) is the third in a series of studies being conducted by the U.S.
Department of Education (ED), with the goal of describing the
characteristics, secondary school experiences, transition, and outcomes
of youth who receive special education services under IDEA. Phase II of
NLTS 2012 will utilize high school and post-high school administrative
records data to collect information in three broad areas important to
understanding outcomes for youth with disabilities: (1) High school
course-taking and outcomes, (2) post-secondary outcomes, and (3)
employment and earnings outcomes. Phase II collected information will
build on a survey of a nationally representative set of students with
and without IEPs from Phase I of
[[Page 15290]]
the study to address the following questions:
To what extent do youth with disabilities who receive
special education services under IDEA make progress through high school
compared with other youth, including those identified for services
under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act? For students with
disabilities, has high school course taking and completion rates
changed over the past few decades?
Are youth with disabilities achieving the post-high school
outcomes envisioned by IDEA, and how do their college, training, and
employment rates compare with those of other youth?
How do these high school and postsecondary experiences and
outcomes vary by student characteristics, including their disability
category, age, sex, race/ethnicity, English Learner status, income
status, and type of high school attended (including regular public
school, charter school, career/technical school, special education
school, or other State or Federally-operated institution)?
The NLTS 2012 sample includes 21,959 students ranging in age from
13 to 21 in December 2011. The sample was selected to include
sufficient number of students in each of the 12 federally defined
disability categories, and adequate number of students without
disabilities, including both students with a Section 504 plan and
students with neither an IEP nor a Section 504 plan. To meet the
study's objective, data will be collected from the following sources:
(1) School district administrative records, including transcripts, from
districts that participated in NLTS 2012; (2) postsecondary enrollment
information through the National Student Clearinghouse, (3) employment
and earnings data from the Social Security Administration (SSA); and
(4) information about vocational rehabilitative services and supports
youth received from the Department's Rehabilitative Services
Administration (RSA). Data collection activities expected to result in
public burden are the collection of administrative data from school
districts and requests for consent from sample members and their
parents.
Dated: March 16, 2016.
Stephanie Valentine,
Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Office of
the Chief Privacy Officer, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-06316 Filed 3-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P