Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Deadline for Implementing Rule 967.1NY(a)(2) and (3), 14917-14919 [2016-06096]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
Number SR–NYSEArca–2016–39 on the
subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–77356; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–36]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2016–39. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2016–39 and should be
submitted on or before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–06088 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Extend the Deadline
for Implementing Rule 967.1NY(a)(2)
and (3)
March 14, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on March 4,
2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the
deadline for implementing Rule
967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31,
2016. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to extend
the deadline for implementing Rule
967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14917
2016. The current implementation
deadline is March 4, 2016.
In March 2015, the Commission
approved Rule 967.1NY, which
provides a price protection risk
mechanism for Market Maker quotes.4
Rule 967.1NY provides two layers of
price protection to incoming Market
Maker quotes, rejecting those Market
Maker quotes that exceed certain
parameters, as a risk mitigation tool.5
The Exchange has implemented the first
layer of price protection (the NBBO
Reasonability Check) and has until one
year from the date of the Approval
Order to implement the second layer of
protection (the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check) pursuant to
Commentary .01 to Rule 967.1NY,
which is March 4, 2016 (the ‘‘March 4th
Deadline’’).6
Because the Exchange has not yet
implemented the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check, the Exchange
proposes to modify Commentary .01 to
Rule 967.1NY to extend the March 4th
Deadline to implement Rule
967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31,
2016. The Exchange has finalized the
technology related to this aspect of the
Rule and will be filing with the
Commission a separate proposed rule
change to modify the Rule as it relates
to the Underlying Stock Price/Strike
Price Check. The Exchange believes the
proposed extension would provide the
Exchange with sufficient time to review
the proposed modifications with the
Commission prior to implementing the
rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
because the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check is an approved rule
of the Exchange, providing the
Exchange with additional time to
implement the Rule would ensure that
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74440
(March 4, 2015), 80 FR 12687 (March 10, 2015) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–116) (Approval Order); see also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74017 (January
8, 2015), 80 FR 1979 (January 14, 2015) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–116) (Notice).
5 The first layer of price protection assesses
incoming sell quotes against the NBB and incoming
buy quotes against the NBO (the ‘‘NBBO Price
Reasonability Check’’). Specifically, per Rule
967.1NY(a)(1), provided that an NBBO is available,
a Market Maker quote would be rejected if it is
priced a specified dollar amount or percentage
through the contra-side NBBO. The second layer of
price protection assesses the price of call or put
bids against a specified benchmark (the
‘‘Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check’’), per
Rule 967.1NY(a)(2) and (3). This second layer of
protection applies to bids in call options or put
options when (1) there is no NBBO available, for
example, during pre-opening or prior to conducting
a re-opening after a trading halt, or (2) if the NBBO
is so wide as to not reflect an appropriate price for
the respective options series.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75151
(June 11, 2015), 80 FR 34770 (June 17, 2015) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2015–42).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
14918
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
Market Makers and investors are
afforded the opportunity to benefit from
this price protection feature once it is
implemented.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
2. Statutory Basis
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,7
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5),8 in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes
the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and
removes impediments to, and perfects
the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system
because an extension of the March 4th
Deadline would enable the Exchange to
implement the finalized technology
related to the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check. Moreover, the
proposed extension would assist with
the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and protect investors and the
public interest because it would afford
the Exchange additional time to file, and
review, with the Commission a
proposed modification of the Rule as it
relates to the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check prior to
implementing the rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
because the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check is an approved rule
of the Exchange, providing the
Exchange with additional time to
implement the Rule would ensure that
Market Makers and investors are
afforded the opportunity to benefit from
this price protection feature once it is
implemented—even if in modified form.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not designed to
address any competitive issues, but
rather, to extend the deadline for
implementing the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check pending
finalization of the technology associated
with that feature.
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.10
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),12 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest as it will allow the
Exchange to immediately extend the
implementation deadline for the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check without delay and provide the
Exchange additional time to implement
the technology associated with such
price protection. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.13
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Commission
has waived this requirement in this case.
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–36 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–36. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
identifying information from
submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–
36, and should be submitted on or
before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–06096 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77366; File No. SR–MSRB–
2016–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Revise an Effective Date of
Several Previously-Approved
Amendments to Rule G–14, on
Transaction Reporting
March 14, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on March 2, 2016, the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
(the ‘‘MSRB’’ or ‘‘Board’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the MSRB. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The MSRB filed with the Commission
a proposed rule change to revise the
May 23, 2016, effective date of several
previously-approved amendments to
Rule G–14, on transaction reporting
(‘‘proposed rule change’’).3 The MSRB
has designated the proposed rule change
for immediate effectiveness. The new
effective date of the amendments to
Rule G–14 will be July 18, 2016.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the MSRB’s Web site at
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Exchange Act Release No. 75039 (May 22,
2015), 80 FR 31084 (June 1, 2015) (SR–MSRB–
2015–02).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
www.msrb.org/Rules-andInterpretations/SEC-Filings/2016Filings.aspx, at the MSRB’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
MSRB included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The MSRB has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The MSRB proposes to revise the
effective date of amendments to Rule G–
14. On May 22, 2015, the Commission
approved the amendments with a yearlong implementation period and an
effective date of May 23, 2016.4 Rule G–
14 requires dealers to report all
executed transactions in most municipal
securities to the MSRB’s Real-Time
Transaction Reporting System (‘‘RTRS’’)
within 15 minutes of the time of trade,
with limited exceptions. RTRS serves
the dual objectives of price transparency
and market surveillance. Because a
comprehensive database of transactions
is needed for the surveillance function
of RTRS, Rule G–14, with limited
exceptions, requires dealers to report all
of their purchase-sale transactions to
RTRS, not only those that qualify for
public dissemination to serve the
transparency function of the system.
The MSRB makes transaction data
available to the general public through
the Electronic Municipal Market Access
(EMMA®) Web site at no cost, and
disseminates such data through paid
subscription services to market data
vendors, institutional market
participants and others that subscribe to
the data feed.
The amendments to Rule G–14
enhance the post-trade price
transparency information provided
through RTRS by:
• Expanding the application of the
existing list offering price and takedown
indicator to cases involving distribution
participant dealers and takedown
4 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14919
transactions that are not at a discount
from the list offering price;
• eliminating the requirement for
dealers to report yield on customer trade
reports and, instead, enabling the MSRB
to calculate and disseminate yield on
customer trades;
• establishing a new indicator for
customer trades involving nontransaction-based compensation
arrangements; and
• establishing a new indicator for
alternative trading system (‘‘ATS’’)
transactions.
The Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) obtained
Commission approval to make similar
changes to the post-trade reporting
requirements for its members with
respect to securities eligible for FINRA’s
Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine
(‘‘TRACE’’).5 These similar FINRA
requirements were also set to take effect
on May 23, 2016, which FINRA believed
(at the time it proposed its rule change)
would be sufficient lead-time for its
members to facilitate planning and
scheduling of necessary technological
changes, but it recently extended the
effective date to be July 18, 2016. FINRA
provided the extension to provide
members additional time to complete
systems changes necessary to comply
with the reporting requirements.6
In setting an effective date of May 23,
2016, one year from the date of
Commission approval of the
amendments to Rule G–14, the MSRB
intended to provide sufficient time for
brokers, dealers and municipal
securities dealers (collectively,
‘‘dealers’’), and subscribers, to
undertake programming changes related
to the amendments, as well as to
provide an adequate testing period for
dealers and subscribers that interface
with RTRS. While the MSRB believes
that one year was a sufficient amount of
time for dealers and subscribers to make
the programming changes necessary to
comply with the amendments to Rule
G–14, it believes that harmonization
with the implementation of similar
FINRA reporting requirements will
5 See FINRA Rules 6730 and 6732; Exchange Act
Release No. 76176 (Oct. 16, 2015), 80 FR 64039
(Oct. 22, 2015) (SR–FINRA–2015–026) (requiring
the reporting of an indicator when a TRACE report
does not reflect a commission or mark-up/markdown); Exchange Act Release No. 76677 (Dec. 17,
2015), 80 FR 79966 (Dec. 23, 2015) (SR–FINRA–
2015–055) (providing FINRA with authority to grant
exemptions from TRACE reporting requirements for
certain ATS transactions, and requiring the
reporting of the identity of the ATS on which an
exempted trade occurs). See also https://
www.finra.org/industry/trace/trace-reporting-anddissemination-no-remuneration-trades-and-ats.
6 See Exchange Act Release No. 77015 (Feb. 2,
2016), 81 FR 6555 (Feb. 8, 2016) (SR–FINRA–2016–
003).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14917-14919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06096]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-77356; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-36]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Deadline
for Implementing Rule 967.1NY(a)(2) and (3)
March 14, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on March 4, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the deadline for implementing Rule
967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to extend the deadline for implementing
Rule 967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The current
implementation deadline is March 4, 2016.
In March 2015, the Commission approved Rule 967.1NY, which provides
a price protection risk mechanism for Market Maker quotes.\4\ Rule
967.1NY provides two layers of price protection to incoming Market
Maker quotes, rejecting those Market Maker quotes that exceed certain
parameters, as a risk mitigation tool.\5\ The Exchange has implemented
the first layer of price protection (the NBBO Reasonability Check) and
has until one year from the date of the Approval Order to implement the
second layer of protection (the Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check) pursuant to Commentary .01 to Rule 967.1NY, which is March 4,
2016 (the ``March 4th Deadline'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74440 (March 4,
2015), 80 FR 12687 (March 10, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-116) (Approval
Order); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74017 (January
8, 2015), 80 FR 1979 (January 14, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-116)
(Notice).
\5\ The first layer of price protection assesses incoming sell
quotes against the NBB and incoming buy quotes against the NBO (the
``NBBO Price Reasonability Check''). Specifically, per Rule
967.1NY(a)(1), provided that an NBBO is available, a Market Maker
quote would be rejected if it is priced a specified dollar amount or
percentage through the contra-side NBBO. The second layer of price
protection assesses the price of call or put bids against a
specified benchmark (the ``Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check''), per Rule 967.1NY(a)(2) and (3). This second layer of
protection applies to bids in call options or put options when (1)
there is no NBBO available, for example, during pre-opening or prior
to conducting a re-opening after a trading halt, or (2) if the NBBO
is so wide as to not reflect an appropriate price for the respective
options series.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75151 (June 11,
2015), 80 FR 34770 (June 17, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-42).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the Exchange has not yet implemented the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check, the Exchange proposes to modify Commentary
.01 to Rule 967.1NY to extend the March 4th Deadline to implement Rule
967.1NY(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The Exchange has finalized
the technology related to this aspect of the Rule and will be filing
with the Commission a separate proposed rule change to modify the Rule
as it relates to the Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check. The
Exchange believes the proposed extension would provide the Exchange
with sufficient time to review the proposed modifications with the
Commission prior to implementing the rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that because the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check is an approved rule of the Exchange, providing
the Exchange with additional time to implement the Rule would ensure
that
[[Page 14918]]
Market Makers and investors are afforded the opportunity to benefit
from this price protection feature once it is implemented.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\8\
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general,
to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to, and perfects
the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system
because an extension of the March 4th Deadline would enable the
Exchange to implement the finalized technology related to the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check. Moreover, the proposed
extension would assist with the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and protect investors and the public interest because it would
afford the Exchange additional time to file, and review, with the
Commission a proposed modification of the Rule as it relates to the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check prior to implementing the
rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that because the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check is an approved rule of the Exchange, providing
the Exchange with additional time to implement the Rule would ensure
that Market Makers and investors are afforded the opportunity to
benefit from this price protection feature once it is implemented--even
if in modified form.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not designed to address any competitive issues, but rather, to extend
the deadline for implementing the Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check pending finalization of the technology associated with that
feature.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission has waived this requirement in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest as it will allow the
Exchange to immediately extend the implementation deadline for the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check without delay and provide the
Exchange additional time to implement the technology associated with
such price protection. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the
30-day operative delay requirement and designates the proposed rule
change as operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-36 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-36. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal
[[Page 14919]]
identifying information from submissions.
You should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-
36, and should be submitted on or before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-06096 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P