Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change Amending the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule, 9027-9029 [2016-03737]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 11 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 12
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 13 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–26 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2016–26. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–26 and should be
submitted on or before March 15, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–03738 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77168; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Change Amending the NYSE Amex
Options Fee Schedule
February 18, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
4, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
9027
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to exclude from its
monthly calculations of contract volume
any trading day on which the Exchange
is not open for the entire trading day
and/or a disruption affects an Exchange
system that lasts for more than 60
minutes during regular trading hours.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee change effective February 4,
2016. The proposed change is available
on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to exclude from its
monthly calculations of contract volume
any trading day on which (1) the
Exchange is not open for the entire
trading day and/or (2) a disruption
affects an Exchange system that lasts for
more than 60 minutes during regular
trading hours. The Exchange proposes
to implement the fee change effective
February 4, 2016.
As provided in the Exchange’s Fee
Schedule, several of the Exchange’s
transaction fees and credits are based on
trading, quoting and liquidity
thresholds that involve a monthly
calculation of contract volume,
including calculations of average daily
volume (‘‘ADV’’).4 The Exchange
14 17
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Feb 22, 2016
1 15
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 For example, the NYSE Amex Options Market
Makers are eligible for reduced per contract rates for
Continued
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
9028
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
proposes to add a definition of Systems
Disruptions to the Fee Schedule Preface
that would permit the Exchange to
exclude from its monthly contract
volume calculations contracts traded on
any day on which the Exchange is not
is not [sic] open for the entire trading
day. This would allow the Exchange to
exclude days where the Exchange
declares a trading halt in all securities
or honors a market-wide trading halt
declared by another market as well as
days on which the market closes early
for holiday observances. The Exchange’s
proposal is consistent with the rules of
other self-regulatory organizations.5
The artificially low volumes of
trading on days when the Exchange is
not open for the entire trading day
reduces the average daily activity of
ATP Holders both daily and monthly.
Given the decreased trading volumes,
the numerator for the monthly
calculation (e.g., trading volume) would
be correspondingly lower, but the
denominator for the threshold
calculations (e.g., the number of trading
days) would not be decreased, and
could result in an unintended increase
in the cost of trading on the Exchange,
a result that is unintended and
undesirable to the Exchange and its ATP
Holders. The Exchange believes that the
authority to exclude days when the
Exchange is not open for the entire
trading day would provide ATP Holders
electronic transactions in Standard Options based
on rates applicable to monthly contract volume in
a given tier. See Fee Schedule, Section I. C (NYSE
Amex Options Market Maker Sliding Scale—
Electronic). Similarly, Order Flow Providers
(‘‘OFP’’) are eligible for certain credits for orders
submitted to the Exchange as agent payable only on
customer volume based on (1) calculating, on a
monthly basis, the average daily Customer contract
volume an OFP executes Electronically on the
Exchange as a percentage of total average daily
industry Customer equity and ETF options volume,
or (2) calculating, on a monthly basis, the average
daily contract volume an OFP executes
Electronically in all participant types (i.e.,
Customer, Firm, Broker-Dealer, NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker, Non-NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker, and Professional Customer) on the
Exchange, as a percentage of total average daily
industry Customer equity and ETF option volume,
with the further requirement that a specified
percentage of the minimum volume required to
qualify for the Tier must be Customer volume. See
Fee Schedule, Section I. E (Amex Customer
Engagement (‘‘ACE’’) Program—Standard Options).
5 See, e.g., NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Rule
7018(j) (’’ For purposes of determining average daily
volume and total consolidated volume under this
rule, any day that the market is not open for the
entire trading day will be excluded from such
calculation.’’); International Securities Exchange,
LLC Fee Schedule (‘‘For purposes of determining
Priority Customer ADV, any day that the regular
order book is not open for the entire trading day or
the Exchange instructs members in writing to route
their orders to other markets may be excluded from
such calculation; provided that the Exchange will
only remove the day for members that would have
a lower ADV with the day included.’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Feb 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
with greater certainty as to their
monthly costs and diminish the
likelihood of an effective increase in the
cost of trading.6
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to
modify its Fee Schedule to permit the
Exchange to exclude from its monthly
contract calculations, contracts traded
on a trading day where a disruption
affects an Exchange system that lasts for
more than 60 minutes during regular
trading hours even if such disruption
would not be categorized as a complete
outage of the Exchange’s system. Such
a disruption may occur where a certain
options series traded on the Exchange is
unavailable for trading due to an
Exchange system issue or where, while
the Exchange may be able to perform
certain functions with respect to
accepting and processing orders, the
Exchange may be experiencing a failure
to another significant process, such as
routing to other market centers, that
would lead permit holders that rely on
such process to avoid utilizing the
Exchange until the Exchange’s entire
system was operational. Once again, the
Exchange’s proposal is consistent with
the rules of other self-regulatory
organizations.7
The Exchange is not proposing any
changes to the level of rebates currently
being provided on the Exchange, or to
the thresholds required to achieve each
rebate tier.
The proposed change is also not
otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of
any problems that permit holders would
have in complying with the proposed
change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,9 in
particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly
6 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70657 (October 10, 2013), 78 FR 62899 (October 22,
2103) (SR–ISE–2013–51).
7 See, e.g., BATS BZX Exchange Fee Schedule
(‘‘The Exchange excludes from its calculation of
ADAV and ADV shares added or removed on any
day that the Exchange’s system experiences a
disruption that lasts for more than 60 minutes
during regular trading hours (‘‘Exchange System
Disruption’’), on any day with a scheduled early
market close and on the last Friday in June (the
‘‘Russell Reconstitution Day’’).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to permit the Exchange to
eliminate from the calculation days on
which the market is not open the entire
trading day because it preserves the
Exchange’s intent behind adopting
volume-based pricing. Similarly, the
Exchange believes that its proposal is
reasonable because it will help provide
permit holders with a greater level of
certainty as to their level of rebates and
costs for trading in any month where the
Exchange experiences such a system
disruption on one or more trading days.
The Exchange is not proposing to
amend the thresholds permit holders
must achieve to become eligible for, or
the dollar value associated with, the
tiered rebates or fees. By eliminating the
inclusion of a trading day on which a
system disruption occurs, the Exchange
would almost certainly be excluding a
day that would otherwise lower
members’ and member organizations’
contract volume, thereby making it more
likely for permit holders to meet the
minimum or higher tier thresholds and
thus incentivizing permit holders to
increase their participation on the
Exchange in order to meet the next
highest tier.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposal is reasonable because the
proposed exclusion seeks to avoid
penalizing permit holders that might
otherwise qualify for certain tiered
pricing but that, because of a significant
Exchange system problem, would not
participate to the extent that they might
have otherwise participated. The
Exchange believes that certain systems
disruptions could preclude some permit
holders from submitting orders to the
Exchange even if such issue is not
actually a complete systems outage.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the proposal is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the
methodology for the monthly
calculations would apply equally to all
permit holders and to all volume tiers.
The Exchange notes that, although
unlikely, there is some possibility that
a certain small proportion of permit
holders may have a higher ADV as a
percentage of average daily volume [sic]
with their activity included from days
where the Exchange experiences a
system disruption. The Exchange
believes that the proposal would still be
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory given that the impacted
universe is potentially quite small and
that the proposal would benefit the
overwhelming majority of market
participants and would make the overall
cost of trading on the Exchange more
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices
predictable for the membership as a
whole.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,10 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes that, with
respect to monthly contract calculations
for rebates, there are very few instances
where the exclusion would be invoked,
and if invoked, would have little or no
impact on trading decisions or
execution quality. On the contrary, the
Exchange believes that the proposal
fosters competition by avoiding a
penalty to permit holders for days when
trading on the Exchange is disrupted for
a significant portion of the day and
would result in lower total costs to end
users, a positive outcome of competitive
markets. Further, other options
exchanges have adopted rules that are
substantially similar to the change in
ADV calculation being proposed by the
Exchange.11
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
IV. Solicitation of Comments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 12 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 13
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 14 of the Act to
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
note 5, supra.
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Feb 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
9029
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–03737 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77160; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2016–14]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–21. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–21 and should be
submitted on or before March 15, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change Relating To Listing and
Trading of Shares of WBI Tactical
Rotation Shares Under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.600
February 17, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
3, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade shares of the following under
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600
(‘‘Managed Fund Shares’’): WBI Tactical
Rotation Shares. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9027-9029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03737]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-77168; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change Amending the NYSE Amex
Options Fee Schedule
February 18, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on February 4, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to exclude from its monthly calculations of contract
volume any trading day on which the Exchange is not open for the entire
trading day and/or a disruption affects an Exchange system that lasts
for more than 60 minutes during regular trading hours. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change effective February 4, 2016. The
proposed change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to exclude from its
monthly calculations of contract volume any trading day on which (1)
the Exchange is not open for the entire trading day and/or (2) a
disruption affects an Exchange system that lasts for more than 60
minutes during regular trading hours. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective February 4, 2016.
As provided in the Exchange's Fee Schedule, several of the
Exchange's transaction fees and credits are based on trading, quoting
and liquidity thresholds that involve a monthly calculation of contract
volume, including calculations of average daily volume (``ADV'').\4\
The Exchange
[[Page 9028]]
proposes to add a definition of Systems Disruptions to the Fee Schedule
Preface that would permit the Exchange to exclude from its monthly
contract volume calculations contracts traded on any day on which the
Exchange is not is not [sic] open for the entire trading day. This
would allow the Exchange to exclude days where the Exchange declares a
trading halt in all securities or honors a market-wide trading halt
declared by another market as well as days on which the market closes
early for holiday observances. The Exchange's proposal is consistent
with the rules of other self-regulatory organizations.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For example, the NYSE Amex Options Market Makers are
eligible for reduced per contract rates for electronic transactions
in Standard Options based on rates applicable to monthly contract
volume in a given tier. See Fee Schedule, Section I. C (NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker Sliding Scale--Electronic). Similarly, Order
Flow Providers (``OFP'') are eligible for certain credits for orders
submitted to the Exchange as agent payable only on customer volume
based on (1) calculating, on a monthly basis, the average daily
Customer contract volume an OFP executes Electronically on the
Exchange as a percentage of total average daily industry Customer
equity and ETF options volume, or (2) calculating, on a monthly
basis, the average daily contract volume an OFP executes
Electronically in all participant types (i.e., Customer, Firm,
Broker-Dealer, NYSE Amex Options Market Maker, Non-NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker, and Professional Customer) on the Exchange, as a
percentage of total average daily industry Customer equity and ETF
option volume, with the further requirement that a specified
percentage of the minimum volume required to qualify for the Tier
must be Customer volume. See Fee Schedule, Section I. E (Amex
Customer Engagement (``ACE'') Program--Standard Options).
\5\ See, e.g., NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Rule 7018(j) ('' For
purposes of determining average daily volume and total consolidated
volume under this rule, any day that the market is not open for the
entire trading day will be excluded from such calculation.'');
International Securities Exchange, LLC Fee Schedule (``For purposes
of determining Priority Customer ADV, any day that the regular order
book is not open for the entire trading day or the Exchange
instructs members in writing to route their orders to other markets
may be excluded from such calculation; provided that the Exchange
will only remove the day for members that would have a lower ADV
with the day included.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The artificially low volumes of trading on days when the Exchange
is not open for the entire trading day reduces the average daily
activity of ATP Holders both daily and monthly. Given the decreased
trading volumes, the numerator for the monthly calculation (e.g.,
trading volume) would be correspondingly lower, but the denominator for
the threshold calculations (e.g., the number of trading days) would not
be decreased, and could result in an unintended increase in the cost of
trading on the Exchange, a result that is unintended and undesirable to
the Exchange and its ATP Holders. The Exchange believes that the
authority to exclude days when the Exchange is not open for the entire
trading day would provide ATP Holders with greater certainty as to
their monthly costs and diminish the likelihood of an effective
increase in the cost of trading.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70657
(October 10, 2013), 78 FR 62899 (October 22, 2103) (SR-ISE-2013-51).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to modify its Fee Schedule to
permit the Exchange to exclude from its monthly contract calculations,
contracts traded on a trading day where a disruption affects an
Exchange system that lasts for more than 60 minutes during regular
trading hours even if such disruption would not be categorized as a
complete outage of the Exchange's system. Such a disruption may occur
where a certain options series traded on the Exchange is unavailable
for trading due to an Exchange system issue or where, while the
Exchange may be able to perform certain functions with respect to
accepting and processing orders, the Exchange may be experiencing a
failure to another significant process, such as routing to other market
centers, that would lead permit holders that rely on such process to
avoid utilizing the Exchange until the Exchange's entire system was
operational. Once again, the Exchange's proposal is consistent with the
rules of other self-regulatory organizations.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., BATS BZX Exchange Fee Schedule (``The Exchange
excludes from its calculation of ADAV and ADV shares added or
removed on any day that the Exchange's system experiences a
disruption that lasts for more than 60 minutes during regular
trading hours (``Exchange System Disruption''), on any day with a
scheduled early market close and on the last Friday in June (the
``Russell Reconstitution Day'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the level of rebates
currently being provided on the Exchange, or to the thresholds required
to achieve each rebate tier.
The proposed change is also not otherwise intended to address any
other issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that permit
holders would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to permit the Exchange
to eliminate from the calculation days on which the market is not open
the entire trading day because it preserves the Exchange's intent
behind adopting volume-based pricing. Similarly, the Exchange believes
that its proposal is reasonable because it will help provide permit
holders with a greater level of certainty as to their level of rebates
and costs for trading in any month where the Exchange experiences such
a system disruption on one or more trading days. The Exchange is not
proposing to amend the thresholds permit holders must achieve to become
eligible for, or the dollar value associated with, the tiered rebates
or fees. By eliminating the inclusion of a trading day on which a
system disruption occurs, the Exchange would almost certainly be
excluding a day that would otherwise lower members' and member
organizations' contract volume, thereby making it more likely for
permit holders to meet the minimum or higher tier thresholds and thus
incentivizing permit holders to increase their participation on the
Exchange in order to meet the next highest tier.
The Exchange further believes that the proposal is reasonable
because the proposed exclusion seeks to avoid penalizing permit holders
that might otherwise qualify for certain tiered pricing but that,
because of a significant Exchange system problem, would not participate
to the extent that they might have otherwise participated. The Exchange
believes that certain systems disruptions could preclude some permit
holders from submitting orders to the Exchange even if such issue is
not actually a complete systems outage.
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposal is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because the methodology for the monthly
calculations would apply equally to all permit holders and to all
volume tiers.
The Exchange notes that, although unlikely, there is some
possibility that a certain small proportion of permit holders may have
a higher ADV as a percentage of average daily volume [sic] with their
activity included from days where the Exchange experiences a system
disruption. The Exchange believes that the proposal would still be
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory given that the impacted
universe is potentially quite small and that the proposal would benefit
the overwhelming majority of market participants and would make the
overall cost of trading on the Exchange more
[[Page 9029]]
predictable for the membership as a whole.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\10\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that, with respect to monthly contract
calculations for rebates, there are very few instances where the
exclusion would be invoked, and if invoked, would have little or no
impact on trading decisions or execution quality. On the contrary, the
Exchange believes that the proposal fosters competition by avoiding a
penalty to permit holders for days when trading on the Exchange is
disrupted for a significant portion of the day and would result in
lower total costs to end users, a positive outcome of competitive
markets. Further, other options exchanges have adopted rules that are
substantially similar to the change in ADV calculation being proposed
by the Exchange.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See note 5, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \12\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \13\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \14\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-21. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-21 and should
be submitted on or before March 15, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03737 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P