(Consolidated) (Remand) Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review Two Initial Determinations; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension of the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation, 8096-8098 [2016-03205]
Download as PDF
8096
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices
of protecting our public trust resources
for the benefit of all. The information
collected serves as a tool for
enforcement of the depredation orders
and contributes to our knowledge of the
impacts of the depredation orders on
double-crested cormorants. Because of
the risk of enforcement, we believe
those operating under these orders have
reason to collect and report reliable
data. We agree that the control program
would benefit from a systematic
evaluation. This evaluation will be
conducted as resources allow. We did
not make any changes to our
requirements at this time.
Request for Public Comments
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB and us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that it will
be done.
The Southwest RAC meeting will
be held on March 18, 2016, in Ridgway,
Colorado.
DATES:
The Southwest RAC
meeting will be held March 18 at the
Ouray County Fairgrounds Building,
22739 Highway 550, Ridgway, CO
81432. The meeting will begin at 9:30
a.m. and adjourn at approximately 4
p.m. A public comment period
regarding matters on the agenda will be
held at 2 p.m.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Borders, Public Affairs
Specialist, 970–240–5300; 2505 S.
Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, seven days a week, to leave
a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
[LLCOS00000 L10100000.BN0000 16X]
The
Southwest RAC advises the Secretary of
the Interior, through the BLM, on a
variety of public land issues in
Colorado. Topics of discussion for all
Southwest RAC meetings may include
field manager and working group
reports, recreation, fire management,
land use planning, invasive species
management, energy and minerals
management, travel management,
wilderness, land exchange proposals,
cultural resource management and other
issues as appropriate. These meetings
are open to the public. The public may
present written comments to the RACs.
Each formal RAC meeting will also have
time, as identified above, allocated for
hearing public comments. Depending on
the number of people wishing to
comment and time available, the time
for individual oral comments may be
limited.
Notice of Public Meeting, Southwest
Resource Advisory Council
Brian St. George,
Acting BLM Colorado State Director.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Tina A. Campbell,
Chief, Division of Policy, Performance, and
Management Programs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–03200 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972, the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Southwest
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) is
scheduled to meet as indicated below.
SUMMARY:
Bureau of Land Management
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2016–03294 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–928 and
Investigation No. 337–TA–937]
(Consolidated) (Remand) Certain
Windshield Wipers and Components
Thereof; Commission Determination
Not To Review Two Initial
Determinations; Schedule for Filing
Written Submissions on Remedy, the
Public Interest, and Bonding;
Extension of the Target Date for
Completion of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review (1) an initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 43) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainants’ motion to
terminate the remand investigation with
respect to certain products and (2) a
remand ID. The Commission has set a
schedule for filing written submissions
on remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. The Commission has also
determined to extend the target date for
completion of this investigation to April
12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted investigation No.
337–TA–928, Certain Windshield
Wipers and Components Thereof, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘Section
337’’), on September 2, 2014, based on
a complaint filed by Valeo North
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
America, Inc. of Troy, MI, and Delmex
de Juarez S. de R.L. de C.V. of Mexico
(collectively, ‘‘Valeo’’). The complaint
alleges a violation of section 337 by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,891,044 (‘‘the ‘044
patent’’); 7,937,798 (‘‘the ‘798 patent’’);
and 8,220,106 by Federal-Mogul Corp.
of Southfield, Michigan, Federal-Mogul
Vehicle Component Solutions, Inc. of
Southfield, Michigan, and FederalMogul S.A. of Aubange, Belgium
(collectively, ‘‘Federal-Mogul’’). 79 FR
52041–42 (Sep. 2, 2014).
On November 21, 2014, the
Commission instituted a Section 337
investigation No. 337–TA–937, Certain
Windshield Wipers and Components
Thereof, based on a complaint filed by
Valeo. The complaint alleges a violation
of section 337 by reason of infringement
of certain claims of the ‘044 patent and
the ‘798 patent by Trico Products
Corporation of Rochester Hills,
Michigan, Trico Products of
Brownsville, Texas, and Trico
Componentes SA de CV of Tamaulipas,
Mexico (collectively, ‘‘Trico’’). 79 FR
69525–26 (Nov. 21, 2014).
On December 9, 2014, the ALJ
consolidated investigations 337–TA–
928 and 337–TA–937. See ALJ Order
No. 8 in the investigation 337–TA–928.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations does not participate as a
party in these consolidated
investigations.
The evidentiary hearing on the
question of violation of section 337 was
held in July of 2015. On October 22,
2015, the ALJ issued his final ID finding
a violation of section 337 with respect
to certain claims of the ‘798 patent.
On December 21, 2015, the
Commission issued a notice
(‘‘Commission Notice’’) in which the
Commission determined as follows:
(1) To review the ALJ’s determination in
Order No. 36 (Jul. 16, 2015) precluding
arguments and evidence relating to Trico’s
618 and 596 connectors on the basis that they
are obsolete and are irrelevant to the present
investigation, see ALJ Order No. 36 at 1, and
on review, to reverse this determination and
to remand the investigation to the ALJ with
respect to this issue, to make findings
regarding whether Trico products with 618
and 596 connectors infringe either asserted
patent and to make any necessary related
findings, as set forth in the accompanying
Remand Order.
(2) To review the ALJ’s finding that Valeo’s
indirect infringement claims are moot and,
on review, to vacate it. The Commission
finds it unnecessary to reach the issue of
whether Trico induced infringement of the
‘798 patent with respect to the accused
products considered by the ALJ because the
Commission has determined not to review
the ALJ’s finding that Trico directly infringes
the ‘798 patent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
(3) To review the ALJ’s finding that Valeo
established quantitatively and qualitatively
significant investment in plant and
equipment and thus satisfies economic prong
of the domestic industry requirement under
subsection (A) of section 337(a)(3) and, on
review, to take no position with respect to
this finding.
(4) To review the final ID with respect to
footnote 7 on page 17 and, on review, to
modify the subject footnote by striking its
second sentence.
Commission Notice at 2–3. The
Commission determined not to review
the remainder of the final ID.
On January 7, 2016, complainants
Valeo moved to terminate the Remand
Investigation with respect to Trico’s
products with 618 and 596 connectors.
In its motion, Valeo states that it has
withdrawn its assertion of infringement
of the asserted patents against such
products. On January 11, 2016, the ALJ
issued an ID (Order No. 43) granting
Valeo’s unopposed motion.
On the same day, the ALJ issued a
Remand ID. The ALJ stated that in view
of Order No. 43 granting Complainants’
motion to terminate the Remand
Investigation with respect to Trico’s
products with the 618 and 596
connectors, the Commission’s Remand
Order dated December 21, 2015,
directing the ALJ to: (1) Make findings
regarding whether Trico products with
618 and 596 connectors infringe the
Asserted Patents; and (2) issue an ID
within 30 days of the Remand Order
extending the target date, is moot.
Remand ID at 1. No party petitioned for
review of any of the subject IDs, and the
Commission has determined not to
review them. The Commission’s
determination results in a finding of
violation as to the ’798 patent. The
Commission has determined to extend
the target date for completion of this
investigation to April 12, 2016.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in the respondent being required
to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale
of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving
written submissions that address the
form of remedy, if any, that should be
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
article from entry into the United States
for purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8097
affecting it or are likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would have on (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the President has 60 days to
approve or disapprove the
Commission’s action. During this
period, the subject articles would be
entitled to enter the United States under
bond, in an amount determined by the
Commission and prescribed by the
Secretary of the Treasury. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving submissions concerning the
amount of the bond that should be
imposed.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issues under
review. The submissions should be
concise and thoroughly referenced to
the record in this investigation. Parties
to the investigation, interested
government agencies, and any other
interested parties are encouraged to file
written submissions on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. Such submissions should
address the recommended
determination on remedy and bonding
issued on October 22, 2015, by the ALJ.
Complainants are also requested to
submit proposed remedial orders for the
Commission’s consideration.
Complainants are further requested to
provide the expiration date of the ’798
patent and state the HTSUS numbers
under which the accused articles are
imported. The written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed
no later than the close of business on
February 24, 2016. Reply submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on March 2, 2016. No further
submissions on these issues will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by
the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
8098
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–928/937’’) in a prominent place
on the cover page and/or the first page.
(See Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 10, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–03205 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[OMB Number 1140–0073]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Furnishing of
Samples
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register 80 FR 77377, on December14,
2015, allowing for a 60-day comment
period.
Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until March 18, 2016.
DATES:
If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Anita Scheddel, Program Analyst,
Explosives Industry Programs Branch,
99 New York Ave. NE., Washington, DC
20226 at email: Anita.Scheddel@atf.gov.
Written comments and/or suggestions
can also be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent
to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Furnishing of Samples.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form number: None.
Component: Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit.
Other: None.
Abstract: ATF requires licensed
manufacturers and importers and
persons who manufacture or import
explosives materials or ammonium
nitrate to submit samples at the request
of the Director.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An estimated 2,350
respondents will take 30 minutes to
complete the questionnaire.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated annual public
burden associated with this collection is
1, 175 hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E–
405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–03186 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Water
Act
On February 9, 2016, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Montana,
Missoula Division, in a lawsuit entitled
United States v. Michael’s Convenience
Stores, Inc., Civil Action No. 9:16–cv–
00020–DWM.
In its Complaint in this civil action,
the United States alleges that Michael’s
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8096-8098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03205]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-928 and Investigation No. 337-TA-937]
(Consolidated) (Remand) Certain Windshield Wipers and Components
Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review Two Initial
Determinations; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Remedy, the
Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension of the Target Date for
Completion of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review (1) an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 43) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') granting complainants' motion to terminate the remand
investigation with respect to certain products and (2) a remand ID. The
Commission has set a schedule for filing written submissions on remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. The Commission has also determined to
extend the target date for completion of this investigation to April
12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted investigation No.
337-TA-928, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(``Section 337''), on September 2, 2014, based on a complaint filed by
Valeo North
[[Page 8097]]
America, Inc. of Troy, MI, and Delmex de Juarez S. de R.L. de C.V. of
Mexico (collectively, ``Valeo''). The complaint alleges a violation of
section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,891,044 (``the `044 patent''); 7,937,798 (``the `798 patent'');
and 8,220,106 by Federal-Mogul Corp. of Southfield, Michigan, Federal-
Mogul Vehicle Component Solutions, Inc. of Southfield, Michigan, and
Federal-Mogul S.A. of Aubange, Belgium (collectively, ``Federal-
Mogul''). 79 FR 52041-42 (Sep. 2, 2014).
On November 21, 2014, the Commission instituted a Section 337
investigation No. 337-TA-937, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components
Thereof, based on a complaint filed by Valeo. The complaint alleges a
violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of
the `044 patent and the `798 patent by Trico Products Corporation of
Rochester Hills, Michigan, Trico Products of Brownsville, Texas, and
Trico Componentes SA de CV of Tamaulipas, Mexico (collectively,
``Trico''). 79 FR 69525-26 (Nov. 21, 2014).
On December 9, 2014, the ALJ consolidated investigations 337-TA-928
and 337-TA-937. See ALJ Order No. 8 in the investigation 337-TA-928.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations does not participate as a
party in these consolidated investigations.
The evidentiary hearing on the question of violation of section 337
was held in July of 2015. On October 22, 2015, the ALJ issued his final
ID finding a violation of section 337 with respect to certain claims of
the `798 patent.
On December 21, 2015, the Commission issued a notice (``Commission
Notice'') in which the Commission determined as follows:
(1) To review the ALJ's determination in Order No. 36 (Jul. 16,
2015) precluding arguments and evidence relating to Trico's 618 and
596 connectors on the basis that they are obsolete and are
irrelevant to the present investigation, see ALJ Order No. 36 at 1,
and on review, to reverse this determination and to remand the
investigation to the ALJ with respect to this issue, to make
findings regarding whether Trico products with 618 and 596
connectors infringe either asserted patent and to make any necessary
related findings, as set forth in the accompanying Remand Order.
(2) To review the ALJ's finding that Valeo's indirect
infringement claims are moot and, on review, to vacate it. The
Commission finds it unnecessary to reach the issue of whether Trico
induced infringement of the `798 patent with respect to the accused
products considered by the ALJ because the Commission has determined
not to review the ALJ's finding that Trico directly infringes the
`798 patent.
(3) To review the ALJ's finding that Valeo established
quantitatively and qualitatively significant investment in plant and
equipment and thus satisfies economic prong of the domestic industry
requirement under subsection (A) of section 337(a)(3) and, on
review, to take no position with respect to this finding.
(4) To review the final ID with respect to footnote 7 on page 17
and, on review, to modify the subject footnote by striking its
second sentence.
Commission Notice at 2-3. The Commission determined not to review the
remainder of the final ID.
On January 7, 2016, complainants Valeo moved to terminate the
Remand Investigation with respect to Trico's products with 618 and 596
connectors. In its motion, Valeo states that it has withdrawn its
assertion of infringement of the asserted patents against such
products. On January 11, 2016, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 43)
granting Valeo's unopposed motion.
On the same day, the ALJ issued a Remand ID. The ALJ stated that in
view of Order No. 43 granting Complainants' motion to terminate the
Remand Investigation with respect to Trico's products with the 618 and
596 connectors, the Commission's Remand Order dated December 21, 2015,
directing the ALJ to: (1) Make findings regarding whether Trico
products with 618 and 596 connectors infringe the Asserted Patents; and
(2) issue an ID within 30 days of the Remand Order extending the target
date, is moot. Remand ID at 1. No party petitioned for review of any of
the subject IDs, and the Commission has determined not to review them.
The Commission's determination results in a finding of violation as to
the '798 patent. The Commission has determined to extend the target
date for completion of this investigation to April 12, 2016.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the
respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or are likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting
Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843
(Dec. 1994) (Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60
days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this
period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issues under review. The submissions
should be concise and thoroughly referenced to the record in this
investigation. Parties to the investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file
written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. Such submissions should address the recommended determination
on remedy and bonding issued on October 22, 2015, by the ALJ.
Complainants are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for
the Commission's consideration. Complainants are further requested to
provide the expiration date of the '798 patent and state the HTSUS
numbers under which the accused articles are imported. The written
submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than
the close of business on February 24, 2016. Reply submissions must be
filed no later than the close of business on March 2, 2016. No further
submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered
by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
[[Page 8098]]
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-928/937'') in a prominent place
on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed
simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 10, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-03205 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P