Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India, the People's Republic of China, and Sri Lanka: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 7067-7073 [2016-02713]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is to:
1. Landscape Scale Forest
Stewardship Plans;
2. Future of forest nurseries; and
3. Finalize April agenda.
The teleconference is open to the
public. However, the public is strongly
encouraged to RSVP prior to the
teleconference to ensure all related
documents are shared with public
meeting participants. The agenda will
include time for people to make oral
statements of three minutes or less.
Individuals wishing to make an oral
statement should submit a request in
writing 10 days before the planned
meeting to be scheduled on the agenda.
Anyone who would like to bring related
matters to the attention of the
Committee may file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting. Written comments and
time requests for oral comments must be
sent to Laurie Schoonhoven, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Mailstop
1123, Washington, DC 20250; or by
email to lschoonhoven@fs.fed.us. A
summary of the meeting will be posted
on the Web site listed above within 21
days after the meeting.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices,
or other reasonable accommodation. For
access to the facility or proceedings,
please contact the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
Dated: January 29, 2016.
James E. Hubbard,
Deputy Chief, State and Private Forestry.
[FR Doc. 2016–02642 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Forest Service
Ravalli Resource Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Ravalli Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Hamilton, Montana. The committee is
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community Self-
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Determination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with title II of
the Act. RAC information can be found
at the following Web site: https://
www.fs.usda.gov/main/bitterroot/
workingtogether/advisorycommittees.
DATES: The meeting will be held
February 23, 2016, at 6:30 p.m.
All RAC meetings are subject to
cancellation. For status of meeting prior
to attendance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Bitteroot National Forest (NF)
Supervisor’s Office, 1801 North 1st
Street, Hamilton, Montana.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at the Bitteroot NF
Supervisor’s Office. Please call ahead to
facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Domsalla, Designated Federal
Officer, by phone at 406–821–3269 or
via email at rdomsalla@fs.fed.us; or Joni
Lubke, RAC Coordinator, by phone at
406–363–7182 or via email at jmlubke@
fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is for:
1. Project presentations; and
2. To review monitoring reports.
The meeting is open to the public.
The agenda will include time for people
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should request in writing
by February 19, 2016, to be scheduled
on the agenda. Anyone who would like
to bring related matters to the attention
of the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time to make
oral comments must be sent to Joni
Lubke, RAC Coordinator, 1801 N. 1st
Street, Hamilton, Montana 59840; by
email to jmlubke@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 406–363–7159.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7067
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices
or other reasonable accommodation for
access to the facility or proceedings by
contacting the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
Dated: February 4, 2016.
Julie K. King,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2016–02702 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–870, C–570–035, C–542–801]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From India, the People’s
Republic of China, and Sri Lanka:
Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective date: February 10, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Spencer Toubia at (202) 482–0123
(India); Laurel LaCivita at (202) 482–
4243 (People’s Republic of China); and
Elizabeth Eastwood at (202) 482–3874
(Sri Lanka); AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petitions
On January 8, 2016, the Department of
Commerce (Department) received
countervailing duty (CVD) petitions
concerning imports of certain new
pneumatic off-the-road tires (off road
tires) from India, the People’s Republic
of China (PRC), and Sri Lanka, filed in
proper form on behalf of Titan Tire
Corporation (Titan) and the United
Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL–CIO, CLC
(USW) (collectively, Petitioners).1 The
1 See ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and the
People’s Republic of China and Countervailing
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
Continued
10FEN1
7068
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
CVD petitions were accompanied by
antidumping duty (AD) petitions for
India and the PRC.2 Petitioners are a
domestic producer of off road tires and
a recognized union, which represents
the domestic industry engaged in the
manufacture of off road tires in the
United States.3
On January 12, 2016, the Department
requested information and clarification
for certain areas of the Petitions.4
Petitioners filed responses to these
requests on January 14, 2016,5 and
provided further clarification regarding
scope on January 20, 2016.6 On January
21, 2016, ATC Tires Private Ltd. and
Alliance Tire Americas, Inc.
(collectively, Alliance) provided
comments on domestic industry support
and requested that the Department poll
the domestic industry with respect to
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India, the People’s Republic of
China, and Sri Lanka,’’ dated January 8, 2016
(collectively, Petitions).
2 Id.
3 See Volume I of the Petitions, at 1–2.
4 See the following January 12, 2016, letters from
the Department to the Petitioners: ‘‘Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India and the People’s
Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on
Imports from Sri Lanka: Supplemental Questions’’
(General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire),
‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India: Supplemental
Questions,’’ ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the PRC:
Supplemental Questions for Volume III,’’ and
‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from Sri Lanka: Supplemental
Questions.’’
5 See the following January 14, 2016, responses
from Petitioners: ‘‘Petitioners’ Response to the
Department’s January 12, 2016 Supplemental
Questions Regarding General Issues’’ (General
Issues Supplement); ‘‘Scope Supplement to the
Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties
on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from India and the People’s Republic of China
and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the
People’s Republic of China, and Sri Lanka’’ (First
Scope Supplement); ‘‘Petitioners’ Response to the
Department’s January 12, 2016 Supplemental
Questions Regarding the Countervailing Duty
Petition on India’’ (India Supplemental Response);
‘‘Petitioners’ Response to the Department’s January
12, 2016 Supplemental Questions Regarding the
Countervailing Duty Petition on China’’ (PRC
Supplemental Response; and ‘‘Petitioners’ Response
to the Department’s January 12, 2016 Supplemental
Questions Regarding the Countervailing Duty
Petition on Sri Lanka’’ (Sri Lanka Supplemental
Response).
6 See Petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Second Scope
Supplement to the Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and the
People’s Republic of China and Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India, the People’s Republic of
China, and Sri Lanka,’’ dated January 20, 2016
(Second Scope Supplement).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Petitions.7 On January 22, 2016,
Petitioners provided a response to
Alliance’s comments on industry
support and request for polling.8
Alliance provided additional comments
on January 28, 2016.9 On January 27,
2016, the Department determined to toll
all deadlines four business days as a
result of the Federal Government
closure during snowstorm ‘‘Jonas’’,
applicable to this initiation.
As explained in the memorandum
from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department has exercised its discretion
to toll all administrative deadlines due
to the recent closure of the Federal
Government. All deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been
extended by four business days. The
revised deadline for the initiation of
these CVD investigations is now
February 3, 2016.10
In accordance with section 702(b)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Petitioners allege that the
Government of India (GOI), the
Government of China (GOC), and the
Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) are
providing countervailable subsidies
(within the meaning of sections 701 and
771(5) of the Act) to imports of off road
tires from India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka,
respectively, and that such imports are
materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, an industry in the
United States. Also, consistent with
section 702(b)(1) of the Act, for those
alleged programs in India, the PRC, and
Sri Lanka on which we have initiated a
CVD investigation, the Petitions are
accompanied by information reasonably
available to Petitioners supporting their
allegation.
The Department finds that Petitioners
filed these Petitions on behalf of the
domestic industry because Petitioners
7 See letter from Alliance, ‘‘Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the
People’s Republic of China and Sri Lanka:
Comments on Industry Support,’’ dated January 21,
2016 (Alliance Letter).
8 See letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Petitioners’
Response to Alliance’s Polling Request Regarding
the Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India and the People’s
Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on
Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from India, the People’s Republic of China,
and Sri Lanka,’’ dated January 22, 2016
(‘‘Petitioners’ Response to Alliance Letter’’).
9 See letter from Alliance, ‘‘Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the
People’s Republic of China and Sri Lanka: Reply
Comments on Industry Support,’’ dated January 21,
2016 (‘‘Alliance Letter II’’).
10 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement &
Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure
During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are interested parties as defined in
sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act.
The Department also finds that
Petitioners demonstrated sufficient
industry support with respect to the
initiation of the CVD investigations that
Petitioners are requesting.11
Period of Investigation
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2),
because the Petitions were filed on
January 8, 2016, the period of
investigation is January 1, 2015, through
December 31, 2015, for India, the PRC,
and Sri Lanka.
Scope of the Investigations
The product covered by these
investigations is off road tires from
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka. For a full
description of the scope of these
investigations, see the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigations’’ in Appendix I of this
notice. As explained in more detail in
Appendix I, the scope of the PRC
investigation is narrower than the scope
of the investigations from India and Sri
Lanka because the PRC investigation
excludes any products covered by the
existing antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from
the PRC.12
Comments on Scope of the
Investigations
During our review of the Petitions, the
Department issued questions to, and
received responses from, Petitioners
pertaining to the proposed scope to
ensure that the scope language in the
Petitions would be an accurate
reflection of the products for which the
domestic industry is seeking relief.13
As discussed in the preamble to the
Department’s regulations,14 we are
setting aside a period for interested
parties to raise issues regarding product
coverage (scope). The Department will
consider all comments received from
interested parties, and if necessary, will
consult with interested parties prior to
the issuance of the preliminary
determinations. If scope comments
11 See the ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for
the Petitions’’ section below.
12 See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Amended Final Affirmative Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order, 73 FR 51624 (September 4, 2008) (A–570–
912), and Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From the People’s Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 51626 (September
4, 2008) (C–570–913).
13 See General Issues Supplemental
Questionnaire and First and Second Scope
Supplements.
14 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing
Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19,
1997).
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
include factual information (see 19 CFR
351.102(b)(21)), all such factual
information should be limited to public
information. In order to facilitate
preparation of its questionnaires, the
Department requests all interested
parties submit such comments by 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on Tuesday,
February 23, 2016, which is 20 calendar
days from the signature date of this
notice. Any rebuttal comments, which
may include factual information, must
be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on Friday,
March 4, 2016, which is 10 calendar
days after the initial comments
deadline.
The Department requests that any
factual information the parties consider
relevant to the scope of the
investigations be submitted during this
time period. However, if a party
subsequently finds that additional
factual information pertaining to the
scope of the investigations may be
relevant, the party may contact the
Department and request permission to
submit the additional information. All
such comments must also be filed on
the record of each of the concurrent AD
and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to the Department
must be filed electronically using
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS).15 An electronically-filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the time and date it is
due. Documents excepted from the
electronic submission requirements
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper
form) with Enforcement and
Compliance’s APO/Dockets Unit, Room
18022, U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, and
stamped with the date and time of
receipt by the applicable deadlines.
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Consultations
Pursuant to section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of
the Act, the Department notified
representatives of the GOI, GOC, and
GOSL of the receipt of the Petitions.
Also, in accordance with section
15 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System
Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014) for details
of the Department’s electronic filing requirements,
which went into effect on August 5, 2011.
Information on help using ACCESS can be found at
https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/
Handbook%
20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act, the
Department provided representatives of
the GOI, GOC, and GOSL the
opportunity for consultations with
respect to the CVD Petitions.
Consultations were held in
Washington, DC with representatives of
GOSL on January 14, 2016, and with
representatives from GOI on January 28,
2016.16 The GOC did not accept our
invitation to hold consultations before
the initiation.17 All invitation letters
and memoranda regarding these
consultations are on file electronically
via ACCESS.
Determination of Industry Support for
the Petitions
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires
that a petition be filed on behalf of the
domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A)
of the Act provides that a petition meets
this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the
petition account for: (i) At least 25
percent of the total production of the
domestic like product; and (ii) more
than 50 percent of the production of the
domestic like product produced by that
portion of the industry expressing
support for, or opposition to, the
petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D)
of the Act provides that, if the petition
does not establish support of domestic
producers or workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product,
the Department shall: (i) Poll the
industry or rely on other information in
order to determine if there is support for
the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine
industry support using a statistically
valid sampling method to poll the
‘‘industry.’’
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines
the ‘‘industry’’ as the producers as a
whole of a domestic like product. Thus,
to determine whether a petition has the
requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to
producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International
16 See Memorandum to the File from Whitley
Herndon, Analyst, entitled, ‘‘Consultations with
Officials from the Government of Sri Lanka
Regarding the Countervailing Duty Petition
Concerning Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road
Tires (Off Road Tires) from Sri Lanka,’’ dated
January 15, 2016; and Memorandum to the File
from Spencer Toubia, Analyst, entitled,
‘‘Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain New
Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from India:
Consultations with the Government of India,’’ dated
January 28, 2016.
17 See Letter from Erin Begnal, Director, Office III,
entitled, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain
New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from the
People’s Republic of China: Invitation for
Consultations to Discuss the Countervailing Duty
Petition,’’ dated January 11, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7069
Trade Commission (ITC), which is
responsible for determining whether
‘‘the domestic industry’’ has been
injured, must also determine what
constitutes a domestic like product in
order to define the industry. While both
the Department and the ITC must apply
the same statutory definition regarding
the domestic like product,18 they do so
for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In
addition, the Department’s
determination is subject to limitations of
time and information. Although this
may result in different definitions of the
like product, such differences do not
render the decision of either agency
contrary to law.19
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the
domestic like product as ‘‘a product
which is like, or in the absence of like,
most similar in characteristics and uses
with, the article subject to an
investigation under this title.’’ Thus, the
reference point from which the
domestic like product analysis begins is
‘‘the article subject to an investigation’’
(i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to
be investigated, which normally will be
the scope as defined in the Petitions).
With regard to the domestic like
product, Petitioners do not offer a
definition of the domestic like product
distinct from the scope of the
investigations. Based on our analysis of
the information submitted on the
record, we determined that off road tires
constitute a single domestic like product
and we analyzed industry support in
terms of that domestic like product.20
In determining whether Petitioners
have standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered
the industry support data contained in
the Petitions with reference to the
domestic like product as defined in the
18 See
section 771(10) of the Act.
USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp.
2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd.
v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988),
aff’d 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
20 For a discussion of the domestic like product
analysis in this case, see Countervailing Duty
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India (India
CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II,
Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the
People’s Republic of China, and Sri Lanka
(Attachment II); Countervailing Duty Investigation
Initiation Checklist: Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II;
and Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka CVD Initiation
Checklist), at Attachment II. These checklists are
dated concurrently with this notice and on file
electronically via ACCESS. Access to documents
filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department
of Commerce building.
19 See
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7070
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
‘‘Scope of the Investigations,’’ in
Appendix I of this notice. To establish
industry support, Petitioners provided
Titan’s production of the domestic like
product in 2015 and estimated the 2015
production for each remaining U.S.
producer of off road tires, by plant.
Petitioners based their estimates of 2015
off road tire production by plant on
daily plant-specific production capacity
data published in Modern Tire Dealer.
Petitioners multiplied the daily
production capacity data by 360 (to
estimate annual capacity) and then
multiplied the annual production
capacity for each plant by Titan’s
capacity utilization rate, which
Petitioners believe is representative of
the U.S. off road tires industry (to
estimate domestic production by each
plant). To calculate industry support,
Petitioners added Titan’s 2015
production of the domestic like product
to the estimated 2015 production of the
domestic like product for those plants
represented by the USW, and divided
the result by the estimated production
of the domestic like product in 2015 for
the entire U.S. off road tires industry.21
We relied on the data Petitioners
provided for purposes of measuring
industry support.22
On January 21, 2016, we received
comments on industry support from
ATC Tires Private Ltd. and Alliance Tire
Americas, Inc. (collectively, Alliance),
an Indian producer of the subject
merchandise and its U.S. importer.23
Petitioners responded to these
comments on January 22, 2016.24
Alliance submitted additional industry
support comments on January 28,
2016.25 For further discussion of these
comments, see the India CVD Initiation
Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist,
and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist,
at Attachment II.
On January 21, 2016, we received
comments on industry support from
Alliance, an Indian producer of the
subject merchandise and its U.S.
importer.26 Petitioners responded to
these comments on January 22, 2016.27
Alliance submitted additional industry
21 See Volume I of the Petitions, at I–5—I–9 and
Exhibits I–3—I–9 and I–33; see also General Issues
Supplement, at 4–9 and Exhibits I–SQ–1, I–SQ–5—
I–SQ–8.
22 Id. For further discussion, see India CVD
Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist,
and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at
Attachment II.
23 See Letter from Alliance, dated January 21,
2016.
24 See Letter from Petitioners, dated January 22,
2016.
25 See Letter from Alliance, dated January 28,
2016.
26 See Alliance Letter.
27 See Petitioners’ Response to the Alliance Letter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
support comments on January 28,
2016.28 For further discussion of these
comments, see the India CVD Initiation
Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist,
and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist,
at Attachment II.
Our review of the data provided in the
Petitions, General Issues Supplement,
letters from Alliance and Petitioners,
and other information readily available
to the Department indicates that
Petitioners have established industry
support.29 First, the Petitions
established support from domestic
producers and workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product
and, as such, the Department is not
required to take further action in order
to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling).30 Second, the domestic
producers and workers have met the
statutory criteria for industry support
under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act
because the domestic producers and
workers who support the Petitions
account for at least 25 percent of the
total production of the domestic like
product.31 Finally, the domestic
producers and workers have met the
statutory criteria for industry support
under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act
because the domestic producers and
workers who support the Petitions
account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product
produced by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petitions.32 Accordingly, the
Department determines that the
Petitions were filed on behalf of the
domestic industry within the meaning
of section 702(b)(1) of the Act.
The Department finds that Petitioners
filed the Petitions on behalf of the
domestic industry because they are
interested parties as defined in sections
771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act and they
have demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the CVD
investigations that they are requesting
the Department initiate.33
Injury Test
Because India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka
are ‘‘Subsidies Agreement Countries’’
within the meaning of section 701(b) of
28 See
Alliance Letter II.
India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD
Initiation Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation
Checklist, at Attachment II.
30 See section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act; see also
India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist,
at Attachment II.
31 See India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD
Initiation Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation
Checklist, at Attachment II.
32 Id.
33 Id.
29 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to these investigations.
Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject
merchandise from India, the PRC, and
Sri Lanka materially injure, or threaten
material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation
Petitioners allege that imports of the
subject merchandise are benefitting
from countervailable subsidies and that
such imports are causing, or threaten to
cause, material injury to the U.S.
industry producing the domestic like
product. In CVD petitions, section
771(24)(A) of the Act provides that
imports of subject merchandise must
exceed the negligibility threshold of
three percent, except that imports of
subject merchandise from developing
countries in CVD investigations must
exceed the negligibility threshold of
four percent, pursuant to section
771(24)(B) of the Act. Petitioners
demonstrate that imports from India and
Sri Lanka, which have been designated
as least-developed countries under
section 771(36)(B) of the Act, exceed the
four percent negligibility threshold
provided for under section 771(24)(B) of
the Act.34
With regard to the PRC, Petitioners
argue that the covered tires are entered
under at least fifteen basket categories
that do not permit the imports to be
reliably quantified based on publicly
available data. Accordingly, the data do
not show whether imports from the PRC
meet the statutory requirements for
negligibility. However, Petitioners allege
and provide supporting evidence that
(1) there is a reasonable indication that
data obtained in the ITC’s investigation
will establish that imports exceed the
negligibility threshold,35 and (2) there is
the potential that imports from the PRC
will imminently exceed the negligibility
threshold. Petitioners’ arguments
regarding the limitations of publicly
available import data and the collection
of scope-specific import data in the
ITC’s investigation are consistent with
the SAA. Furthermore, Petitioners’
arguments regarding the potential for
imports to imminently exceed the
negligibility threshold are consistent
with the statutory criteria for
‘‘negligibility in threat analysis’’ under
section 771(24)(A)(iv) of the Act, which
provides that imports shall not be
treated as negligible if there is a
34 See Volume I of the Petitions, at I–27, I–28, I–
34 and Exhibit I–17.
35 See Statement of Administrative Action (SAA),
H.R. Doc. No. 103–316, Vol. 1, (1994) (SAA), at 857;
see also Volume I of the Petitions, at I–29—I–34 and
Exhibits I–17—I–21.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
potential that subject imports from a
country will imminently exceed the
statutory requirements for negligibility.
Petitioners contend that the industry’s
injured condition is illustrated by
reduced market share; decline in
shipments, production, and capacity
utilization; underselling and price
suppression or depression; reduced
employment variables; lost sales and
revenues; and decline in financial
performance.36 We assessed the
allegations and supporting evidence
regarding material injury, threat of
material injury, and causation, and we
have determined that these allegations
are properly supported by adequate
evidence and meet the statutory
requirements for initiation.37
Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigations
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires
the Department to initiate a CVD
investigation whenever an interested
party filed a CVD petition on behalf of
an industry that: (1) Alleges elements
necessary for an imposition of a duty
under section 701(a) of the Act; and (2)
is accompanied by information
reasonably available to Petitioner
supporting the allegations.
Petitioners allege that producers/
exporters of off road tires in India, the
PRC, and Sri Lanka benefit from
countervailable subsidies bestowed by
the GOI, GOC, and GOSL, respectively.
The Department examined the Petitions
and finds that they comply with the
requirements of section 702(b)(1) of the
Act. Therefore, in accordance with
section 702(b)(1) of the Act, we are
initiating CVD investigations to
determine whether manufacturers,
producers, or exporters of off road tires
from India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka
receive countervailable subsidies from
the GOI, GOC, and GOSL, respectively.
On June 29, 2015, the President of the
United States signed into law the Trade
Preferences Extension Act of 2015,
which made numerous amendments to
the AD and CVD law.38 The 2015 law
does not specify dates of application for
those amendments. On August 6, 2015,
36 See Volume I of the Petitions, at I–18 through
I–22, I–24 through I–61 and Exhibits I–14, I–15, I–
17 through I–37; see also General Issues
Supplement, at 1–3 and Exhibits I–SQ–1 and I–SQ–
4.
37 See India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD
Initiation Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation
Checklist, at Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations
and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation for
the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from India, the People’s Republic of China,
and Sri Lanka.
38 See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015,
Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Department published an
interpretative rule, in which it
announced the applicability dates for
each amendment to the Act, except for
amendments contained in section 771(7)
of the Act, which relate to
determinations of material injury by the
ITC.39 The amendments to sections
771(15), 773, 776, and 782 of the Act are
applicable to all determinations made
on or after August 6, 2015, and,
therefore, apply to these CVD
investigations.40
India
Based on our review of the petition,
we find that there is sufficient
information to initiate a CVD
investigation on 27 of the 29 alleged
programs in India.41 For a full
discussion of the basis for our decision
to initiate or not initiate on each
program, see the India CVD Initiation
Checklist.
PRC
Based on our review of the petition,
we find that there is sufficient
information to initiate a CVD
investigation on all 38 alleged programs
in the PRC.42 For a full discussion of the
basis for our decision to initiate on each
program, see the PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist.
Sri Lanka
Based on our review of the petition,
we find that there is sufficient
information to initiate a CVD
investigation on 16 of the 22 alleged
programs in Sri Lanka.43 For a full
discussion of the basis for our decision
to initiate or not initiate on each
program, see Sri Lanka CVD Initiation
Checklist.
A public version of the initiation
checklists for each investigation is
available on ACCESS.
In accordance with section 703(b)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1),
unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary determination no later than
65 days after the date of this initiation.
Respondent Selection
Petitioners named six companies as
producers/exporters of off road tires
39 See Dates of Application of Amendments to the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws Made
by the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 80
FR 46793 (August 6, 2015) (Applicability Notice).
40 Id., at 46794–95. The 2015 amendments may be
found at https://www.congress.gov/bill/114thcongress/house-bill/1295/text/pl.
41 See India CVD Initiation Checklist for a more
detailed explanation.
42 See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist for a more
detailed explanation.
43 See Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist for a
more detailed explanation.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7071
from India and 17 from Sri Lanka.44
Following standard practice in CVD
investigations, for the India and Sri
Lanka CVD cases, the Department
intends to select respondents based on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data for U.S. imports of off road
tires during the periods of investigation
under the appropriate Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
numbers listed in the scope of
Appendix I, below. We intend to release
CBP data under Administrative
Protective Order (APO) to all parties
with access to information protected by
APO within five business days of
publication of this Federal Register
notice.
Interested parties wishing to comment
regarding the CBP data and/or
respondent selection for India and Sri
Lanka must do so within seven calendar
days after the placement of the CBP data
on the record of this investigation.
Parties wishing to submit rebuttal
comments should submit those
comments five calendar days after the
deadline for the initial comments. An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. ET by the
date noted above. We intend to make
our decision regarding respondent
selection within 20 days of publication
of this notice.
With respect to the PRC, Petitioners
named 28 companies as producers/
exporters of off road tires.45 Because of
the existing CVD order on Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the
PRC, the Department is giving further
consideration to the appropriate
methodology for selecting respondents
in this investigation.
In accordance with section
702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version
of the Petitions have been provided to
the GOI, GOC, and GOSL via ACCESS.
To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public
version of the Petitions to each exporter
named in the Petitions, as provided
under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
We will notify the ITC of our
initiation, as required by section 702(d)
of the Act.
Preliminary Determinations by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine,
within 45 days after the date on which
the Petitions were filed, whether there
44 See Volume I of the Petitions, at Exhibits I–13
and I–36.
45 See Volume I of the Petition at Exhibit I–12.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7072
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
is a reasonable indication that imports
of off road tires from India, the PRC, and
Sri Lanka are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, a U.S.
industry.46 A negative ITC
determination for any country will
result in the investigation being
terminated with respect to that
country; 47 otherwise, these
investigations will proceed according to
statutory and regulatory time limits.
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) Evidence
submitted in response to questionnaires;
(ii) evidence submitted in support of
allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on
the record by the Department; and (v)
evidence other than factual information
described in (i)–(iv). Any party, when
submitting factual information, to
specify under which subsection of 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is
being submitted 48 and, if the
information is submitted to rebut,
clarify, or correct factual information
already on the record, to provide an
explanation identifying the information
already on the record that the factual
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or
correct.49 Time limits for the
submission of factual information are
addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which
provides specific time limits based on
the type of factual information being
submitted. Parties should review the
regulations prior to submitting factual
information in these investigations.
Extension of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of
time limits before the expiration of a
time limit established under 19 CFR
351, or as otherwise specified by the
Secretary. In general, an extension
request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351
expires. For submissions that are due
from multiple parties simultaneously,
an extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET
on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, we may elect to specify
a different time limit by which
extension requests will be considered
untimely for submissions which are due
from multiple parties simultaneously. In
such a case, we will inform parties in
46 See
section 703(a)(2) of the Act.
47 See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
48 See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
49 See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
the letter or memorandum setting forth
the deadline (including a specified time)
by which extension requests must be
filed to be considered timely. An
extension request must be made in a
separate, stand-alone submission; under
limited circumstances we will grant
untimely-filed requests for the extension
of time limits. Review Extension of
Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR 57790
(September 20, 2013), available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-201309-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting factual information in these
investigations.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.50
Parties are hereby reminded that revised
certification requirements are in effect
for company/government officials, as
well as their representatives.
Investigations initiated on the basis of
petitions filed on or after August 16,
2013, and other segments of any AD or
CVD proceedings initiated on or after
August 16, 2013, should use the formats
for the revised certifications provided at
the end of the Final Rule.51 The
Department intends to reject factual
submissions if the submitting party does
not comply with the applicable revised
certification requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate
in these investigations should ensure
that they meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 702 and 777(i) of
the Act.
50 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
51 See
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: February 3, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigations
The scope of these investigations is certain
new pneumatic off-the-road tires (certain off
road tires). Certain off road tires are tires with
an off road tire size designation. The tires
included in the scope may be either tubetype 52 or tubeless, radial, or non-radial,
regardless of whether for original equipment
manufacturers or the replacement market.
Subject tires may have the following prefix
or suffix designation, which appears on the
sidewall of the tire:
Prefix designations:
DH—Identifies a tire intended for agricultural
and logging service which must be
mounted on a DH drop center rim.
VA—Identifies a tire intended for agricultural
and logging service which must be
mounted on a VA multipiece rim.
IF—Identifies an agricultural tire to operate
at 20 percent higher rated load than
standard metric tires at the same inflation
pressure.
VF—Identifies an agricultural tire to operate
at 40 percent higher rated load than
standard metric tires at the same inflation
pressure.
Suffix designations:
ML—Mining and logging tires used in
intermittent highway service.
DT—Tires primarily designed for sand and
paver service.
NHS—Not for Highway Service.
TG—Tractor Grader, off-the-road tire for use
on rims having bead seats with nominal
+0.188’’ diameter (not for highway service).
K—Compactor tire for use on 5° drop center
or semi-drop center rims having bead seats
with nominal minus 0.032 diameter.
IND—Drive wheel tractor tire used in
industrial service.
SL—Service limited to agricultural usage.
FI—Implement tire for agricultural towed
highway service.
CFO—Cyclic Field Operation.
SS—Differentiates tires for off-highway
vehicles such as mini and skid-steer
loaders from other tires which use similar
size designations such as 7.00–15TR and
7.00–15NHS, but may use different rim
bead seat configurations.
All tires marked with any of the prefixes
or suffixes listed above in their sidewall
markings are covered by the scope regardless
of their intended use.
In addition, all tires that lack any of the
prefixes or suffixes listed above in their
sidewall markings are included in the scope,
regardless of their intended use, as long as
the tire is of a size that is among the
numerical size designations listed in the
following sections of the Tire and Rim
52 While tube-type tires are subject to the scope
of these proceedings, tubes and flaps are not subject
merchandise and therefore are not covered by the
scope of these proceedings, regardless of the
manner in which they are sold (e.g., sold with or
separately from subject merchandise).
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Association Year Book, as updated annually,
unless the tire falls within one of the specific
exclusions set forth below. The sections of
the Tire and Rim Association Year Book
listing numerical size designations of covered
certain off road tires include:
The table of mining and logging tires
included in the section on Truck-Bus tires;
The entire section on Off-the-Road tires;
The entire section on Agricultural tires;
and
The following tables in the section on
Industrial/ATV/Special Trailer tires:
• Industrial, Mining, Counterbalanced Lift
Truck (Smooth Floors Only);
• Industrial and Mining (Other than
Smooth Floors);
• Construction Equipment;
• Off-the-Road and Counterbalanced Lift
Truck (Smooth Floors Only);
• Aerial Lift and Mobile Crane; and
• Utility Vehicle and Lawn and Garden
Tractor.
Certain off road tires, whether or not
mounted on wheels or rims, are included in
the scope. However, if a subject tire is
imported mounted on a wheel or rim, only
the tire is covered by the scope. Subject
merchandise includes certain off road tires
produced in the subject countries whether
mounted on wheels or rims in a subject
country or in a third country. Certain off road
tires are covered whether or not they are
accompanied by other parts, e.g., a wheel,
rim, axle parts, bolts, nuts, etc. Certain off
road tires that enter attached to a vehicle are
not covered by the scope.
Excluded from the scope of these
investigations are any products covered by
the existing antidumping and countervailing
duty orders on Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from the People’s Republic of
China. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-theRoad Tires From the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR
51624 (September 4, 2008); Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the
People’s Republic of China: Countervailing
Duty Order, 73 FR 51627 (September 4,
2008).53
In addition, specifically excluded from the
scope are passenger vehicle and light truck
tires, racing tires, mobile home tires,
motorcycle tires, all-terrain vehicle tires,
bicycle tires, on-road or on-highway trailer
tires, and truck and bus tires. Such tires
generally have in common that the symbol
‘‘DOT’’ must appear on the sidewall,
certifying that the tire conforms to applicable
motor vehicle safety standards. Such
excluded tires may also have the following
prefixes and suffixes included as part of the
size designation on their sidewalls:
Prefix letter designations:
53 In these prior investigations, the Department
found that imports of off road tires mounted on
wheels were not within the scope of subject
merchandise. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-TheRoad Tires from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR
40485 (July 15, 2008) and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 19.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
AT—Identifies a tire intended for service on
All-Terrain Vehicles;
P—Identifies a tire intended primarily for
service on passenger cars;
LT—Identifies a tire intended primarily for
service on light trucks;
T—Identifies a tire intended for one-position
‘‘temporary use’’ as a spare only; and
ST—Identifies a special tire for trailers in
highway service.
Suffix letter designations:
TR—Identifies a tire for service on trucks,
buses, and other vehicles with rims having
specified rim diameter of nominal plus
0.156″ or plus 0.250″;
MH—Identifies tires for Mobile Homes;
HC—Identifies a heavy duty tire designated
for use on ‘‘HC’’ 15″ tapered rims used on
trucks, buses, and other vehicles. This
suffix is intended to differentiate among
tires for light trucks, and other vehicles or
other services, which use a similar
designation.
Example: 8R17.5 LT, 8R17.5 HC;
LT—Identifies light truck tires for service on
trucks, buses, trailers, and multipurpose
passenger vehicles used in nominal
highway service;
ST—Special tires for trailers in highway
service; and
M/C—Identifies tires and rims for
motorcycles.
The following types of tires are also
excluded from the scope: Pneumatic tires
that are not new, including recycled or
retreaded tires and used tires; non-pneumatic
tires, including solid rubber tires; aircraft
tires; and turf, lawn and garden, and golf
tires. Also excluded from the scope are
mining and construction tires that have a rim
diameter equal to or exceeding 39 inches.
Such tires may be distinguished from other
tires of similar size by the number of plies
that the construction and mining tires
contain (minimum of 16) and the weight of
such tires (minimum 1500 pounds).
The subject merchandise is currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 4011.20.1025, 4011.20.1035,
4011.20.5030, 4011.20.5050, 4011.61.0000,
4011.62.0000, 4011.63.0000, 4011.69.0050,
4011.92.0000, 4011.93.4000, 4011.93.8000,
4011.94.4000, 4011.94.8000, 8431.49.9038,
8431.49.9090, 8709.90.0020, and
8716.90.1020. Tires meeting the scope
description may also enter under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
4011.99.4550, 4011.99.8550, 8424.90.9080,
8431.20.0000, 8431.39.0010, 8431.49.1090,
8431.49.9030, 8432.90.0005, 8432.90.0015,
8432.90.0030, 8432.90.0080, 8433.90.5010,
8503.00.9560, 8708.70.0500, 8708.70.2500,
8708.70.4530, 8716.90.5035 and
8716.90.5055. While HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
subject merchandise is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–02713 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–869, A–570–034]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From India and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective date: February 3, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Bailey at (202) 482–0193
(India) and Alex Rosen at (202) 482–
7814 (PRC), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petitions
On January 8, 2016, the Department of
Commerce (Department) received
antidumping duty (AD) petitions
concerning imports of certain new
pneumatic off-the-road tires (off road
tires) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) and India, filed in proper
form on behalf of Titan Tire Corporation
(Titan) and the United Steel, Paper and
Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union, AFL–CIO,
CLC (USW) (collectively, Petitioners).1
The AD petitions were accompanied by
three countervailing duty (CVD)
petitions for the PRC, India and Sri
Lanka.2 Petitioners are a domestic
producer of off road tires and a
recognized union, which represents the
domestic industry engaged in the
manufacture of off road tires in the
United States.3
On January 12, 2016, the Department
requested additional information and
clarification of certain areas of the AD
Petitions.4 Petitioners filed responses to
1 See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Offthe-Road Tires from India and the People’s
Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on
Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from India, the People’s Republic of China,
and Sri Lanka, dated January 8, 2016 (collectively,
Petitions).
2 Id.
3 See Volume I of the Petitions, at I–2.
4 See the following January 12, 2016, letters from
the Department to Petitioners: ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic OffThe-Road Tires from India and The People’s
Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on
Imports from Sri Lanka: Supplemental Questions’’
(General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire),
‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties
Continued
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
7073
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7067-7073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02713]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-870, C-570-035, C-542-801]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India, the People's
Republic of China, and Sri Lanka: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigations
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective date: February 10, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Spencer Toubia at (202) 482-0123
(India); Laurel LaCivita at (202) 482-4243 (People's Republic of
China); and Elizabeth Eastwood at (202) 482-3874 (Sri Lanka); AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petitions
On January 8, 2016, the Department of Commerce (Department)
received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of
certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (off road tires) from India,
the People's Republic of China (PRC), and Sri Lanka, filed in proper
form on behalf of Titan Tire Corporation (Titan) and the United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial
and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (USW)
(collectively, Petitioners).\1\ The
[[Page 7068]]
CVD petitions were accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) petitions for
India and the PRC.\2\ Petitioners are a domestic producer of off road
tires and a recognized union, which represents the domestic industry
engaged in the manufacture of off road tires in the United States.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See ``Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on
Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and
the People's Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on Imports
of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the People's
Republic of China, and Sri Lanka,'' dated January 8, 2016
(collectively, Petitions).
\2\ Id.
\3\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 12, 2016, the Department requested information and
clarification for certain areas of the Petitions.\4\ Petitioners filed
responses to these requests on January 14, 2016,\5\ and provided
further clarification regarding scope on January 20, 2016.\6\ On
January 21, 2016, ATC Tires Private Ltd. and Alliance Tire Americas,
Inc. (collectively, Alliance) provided comments on domestic industry
support and requested that the Department poll the domestic industry
with respect to the Petitions.\7\ On January 22, 2016, Petitioners
provided a response to Alliance's comments on industry support and
request for polling.\8\ Alliance provided additional comments on
January 28, 2016.\9\ On January 27, 2016, the Department determined to
toll all deadlines four business days as a result of the Federal
Government closure during snowstorm ``Jonas'', applicable to this
initiation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the following January 12, 2016, letters from the
Department to the Petitioners: ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and the People's Republic of
China and Countervailing Duties on Imports from Sri Lanka:
Supplemental Questions'' (General Issues Supplemental
Questionnaire), ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from
India: Supplemental Questions,'' ``Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from the PRC: Supplemental Questions for Volume III,'' and
``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from Sri Lanka:
Supplemental Questions.''
\5\ See the following January 14, 2016, responses from
Petitioners: ``Petitioners' Response to the Department's January 12,
2016 Supplemental Questions Regarding General Issues'' (General
Issues Supplement); ``Scope Supplement to the Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic
Off-the-Road Tires from India and the People's Republic of China and
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires from India, the People's Republic of China, and Sri
Lanka'' (First Scope Supplement); ``Petitioners' Response to the
Department's January 12, 2016 Supplemental Questions Regarding the
Countervailing Duty Petition on India'' (India Supplemental
Response); ``Petitioners' Response to the Department's January 12,
2016 Supplemental Questions Regarding the Countervailing Duty
Petition on China'' (PRC Supplemental Response; and ``Petitioners'
Response to the Department's January 12, 2016 Supplemental Questions
Regarding the Countervailing Duty Petition on Sri Lanka'' (Sri Lanka
Supplemental Response).
\6\ See Petitioners' submission, ``Second Scope Supplement to
the Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and the People's
Republic of China and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the People's Republic
of China, and Sri Lanka,'' dated January 20, 2016 (Second Scope
Supplement).
\7\ See letter from Alliance, ``Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires from India, the People's Republic of China and Sri Lanka:
Comments on Industry Support,'' dated January 21, 2016 (Alliance
Letter).
\8\ See letter from Petitioners, ``Petitioners' Response to
Alliance's Polling Request Regarding the Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic
Off-the-Road Tires from India and the People's Republic of China and
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires from India, the People's Republic of China, and Sri
Lanka,'' dated January 22, 2016 (``Petitioners' Response to Alliance
Letter'').
\9\ See letter from Alliance, ``Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires from India, the People's Republic of China and Sri Lanka:
Reply Comments on Industry Support,'' dated January 21, 2016
(``Alliance Letter II'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its
discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent
closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the
proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised
deadline for the initiation of these CVD investigations is now February
3, 2016.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S
for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm
Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Petitioners allege that the Government of India
(GOI), the Government of China (GOC), and the Government of Sri Lanka
(GOSL) are providing countervailable subsidies (within the meaning of
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act) to imports of off road tires from
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka, respectively, and that such imports are
materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, an industry in
the United States. Also, consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act,
for those alleged programs in India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka on which we
have initiated a CVD investigation, the Petitions are accompanied by
information reasonably available to Petitioners supporting their
allegation.
The Department finds that Petitioners filed these Petitions on
behalf of the domestic industry because Petitioners are interested
parties as defined in sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act. The
Department also finds that Petitioners demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the initiation of the CVD investigations that
Petitioners are requesting.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See the ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petitions'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2), because the Petitions were filed
on January 8, 2016, the period of investigation is January 1, 2015,
through December 31, 2015, for India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka.
Scope of the Investigations
The product covered by these investigations is off road tires from
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka. For a full description of the scope of
these investigations, see the ``Scope of the Investigations'' in
Appendix I of this notice. As explained in more detail in Appendix I,
the scope of the PRC investigation is narrower than the scope of the
investigations from India and Sri Lanka because the PRC investigation
excludes any products covered by the existing antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
from the PRC.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the
People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order, 73 FR 51624 (September 4, 2008) (A-570-912), and Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 51626 (September 4, 2008) (C-570-
913).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on Scope of the Investigations
During our review of the Petitions, the Department issued questions
to, and received responses from, Petitioners pertaining to the proposed
scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petitions would be an
accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is
seeking relief.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire and First and
Second Scope Supplements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations,\14\
we are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues
regarding product coverage (scope). The Department will consider all
comments received from interested parties, and if necessary, will
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the
preliminary determinations. If scope comments
[[Page 7069]]
include factual information (see 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), all such
factual information should be limited to public information. In order
to facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, the Department
requests all interested parties submit such comments by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET) on Tuesday, February 23, 2016, which is 20 calendar
days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal comments,
which may include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on
Friday, March 4, 2016, which is 10 calendar days after the initial
comments deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department requests that any factual information the parties
consider relevant to the scope of the investigations be submitted
during this time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigations may be relevant, the party may contact the Department
and request permission to submit the additional information. All such
comments must also be filed on the record of each of the concurrent AD
and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically
using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\15\ An electronically-
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the
time and date it is due. Documents excepted from the electronic
submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form)
with Enforcement and Compliance's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 18022, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by
the applicable deadlines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014) for details of the Department's electronic
filing requirements, which went into effect on August 5, 2011.
Information on help using ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%
20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act, the Department
notified representatives of the GOI, GOC, and GOSL of the receipt of
the Petitions. Also, in accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the
Act, the Department provided representatives of the GOI, GOC, and GOSL
the opportunity for consultations with respect to the CVD Petitions.
Consultations were held in Washington, DC with representatives of
GOSL on January 14, 2016, and with representatives from GOI on January
28, 2016.\16\ The GOC did not accept our invitation to hold
consultations before the initiation.\17\ All invitation letters and
memoranda regarding these consultations are on file electronically via
ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Memorandum to the File from Whitley Herndon, Analyst,
entitled, ``Consultations with Officials from the Government of Sri
Lanka Regarding the Countervailing Duty Petition Concerning Certain
New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires (Off Road Tires) from Sri Lanka,''
dated January 15, 2016; and Memorandum to the File from Spencer
Toubia, Analyst, entitled, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain
New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from India: Consultations with the
Government of India,'' dated January 28, 2016.
\17\ See Letter from Erin Begnal, Director, Office III,
entitled, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain New Pneumatic
Off-The-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Invitation
for Consultations to Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,''
dated January 11, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, the Department
shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to
determine if there is support for the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support using a
statistically valid sampling method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and
the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic
like product,\18\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, the Department's
determination is subject to limitations of time and information.
Although this may result in different definitions of the like product,
such differences do not render the decision of either agency contrary
to law.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\19\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
Petitions).
With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioners do not offer
a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope of
the investigations. Based on our analysis of the information submitted
on the record, we determined that off road tires constitute a single
domestic like product and we analyzed industry support in terms of that
domestic like product.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis in
this case, see Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India
(India CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of
Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Petitions Covering Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from
India, the People's Republic of China, and Sri Lanka (Attachment
II); Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China
(PRC CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II; and Countervailing
Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain New Pneumatic Off-
the-Road Tires from Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist),
at Attachment II. These checklists are dated concurrently with this
notice and on file electronically via ACCESS. Access to documents
filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central Records Unit, Room
B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether Petitioners have standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product
as defined in the
[[Page 7070]]
``Scope of the Investigations,'' in Appendix I of this notice. To
establish industry support, Petitioners provided Titan's production of
the domestic like product in 2015 and estimated the 2015 production for
each remaining U.S. producer of off road tires, by plant. Petitioners
based their estimates of 2015 off road tire production by plant on
daily plant-specific production capacity data published in Modern Tire
Dealer. Petitioners multiplied the daily production capacity data by
360 (to estimate annual capacity) and then multiplied the annual
production capacity for each plant by Titan's capacity utilization
rate, which Petitioners believe is representative of the U.S. off road
tires industry (to estimate domestic production by each plant). To
calculate industry support, Petitioners added Titan's 2015 production
of the domestic like product to the estimated 2015 production of the
domestic like product for those plants represented by the USW, and
divided the result by the estimated production of the domestic like
product in 2015 for the entire U.S. off road tires industry.\21\ We
relied on the data Petitioners provided for purposes of measuring
industry support.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at I-5--I-9 and Exhibits I-
3--I-9 and I-33; see also General Issues Supplement, at 4-9 and
Exhibits I-SQ-1, I-SQ-5--I-SQ-8.
\22\ Id. For further discussion, see India CVD Initiation
Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 21, 2016, we received comments on industry support from
ATC Tires Private Ltd. and Alliance Tire Americas, Inc. (collectively,
Alliance), an Indian producer of the subject merchandise and its U.S.
importer.\23\ Petitioners responded to these comments on January 22,
2016.\24\ Alliance submitted additional industry support comments on
January 28, 2016.\25\ For further discussion of these comments, see the
India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, and Sri
Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Letter from Alliance, dated January 21, 2016.
\24\ See Letter from Petitioners, dated January 22, 2016.
\25\ See Letter from Alliance, dated January 28, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 21, 2016, we received comments on industry support from
Alliance, an Indian producer of the subject merchandise and its U.S.
importer.\26\ Petitioners responded to these comments on January 22,
2016.\27\ Alliance submitted additional industry support comments on
January 28, 2016.\28\ For further discussion of these comments, see the
India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, and Sri
Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Alliance Letter.
\27\ See Petitioners' Response to the Alliance Letter.
\28\ See Alliance Letter II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, General Issues
Supplement, letters from Alliance and Petitioners, and other
information readily available to the Department indicates that
Petitioners have established industry support.\29\ First, the Petitions
established support from domestic producers and workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like
product and, as such, the Department is not required to take further
action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g., polling).\30\
Second, the domestic producers and workers have met the statutory
criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act
because the domestic producers and workers who support the Petitions
account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic
like product.\31\ Finally, the domestic producers and workers have met
the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic producers and workers
who support the Petitions account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the
industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petitions.\32\
Accordingly, the Department determines that the Petitions were filed on
behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 702(b)(1)
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
\30\ See section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act; see also India CVD
Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, and Sri Lanka
CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
\31\ See India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
\32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf
of the domestic industry because they are interested parties as defined
in sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act and they have demonstrated
sufficient industry support with respect to the CVD investigations that
they are requesting the Department initiate.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka are ``Subsidies Agreement
Countries'' within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section
701(a)(2) of the Act applies to these investigations. Accordingly, the
ITC must determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka materially injure, or threaten material
injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
Petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In CVD petitions, section
771(24)(A) of the Act provides that imports of subject merchandise must
exceed the negligibility threshold of three percent, except that
imports of subject merchandise from developing countries in CVD
investigations must exceed the negligibility threshold of four percent,
pursuant to section 771(24)(B) of the Act. Petitioners demonstrate that
imports from India and Sri Lanka, which have been designated as least-
developed countries under section 771(36)(B) of the Act, exceed the
four percent negligibility threshold provided for under section
771(24)(B) of the Act.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at I-27, I-28, I-34 and
Exhibit I-17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to the PRC, Petitioners argue that the covered tires
are entered under at least fifteen basket categories that do not permit
the imports to be reliably quantified based on publicly available data.
Accordingly, the data do not show whether imports from the PRC meet the
statutory requirements for negligibility. However, Petitioners allege
and provide supporting evidence that (1) there is a reasonable
indication that data obtained in the ITC's investigation will establish
that imports exceed the negligibility threshold,\35\ and (2) there is
the potential that imports from the PRC will imminently exceed the
negligibility threshold. Petitioners' arguments regarding the
limitations of publicly available import data and the collection of
scope-specific import data in the ITC's investigation are consistent
with the SAA. Furthermore, Petitioners' arguments regarding the
potential for imports to imminently exceed the negligibility threshold
are consistent with the statutory criteria for ``negligibility in
threat analysis'' under section 771(24)(A)(iv) of the Act, which
provides that imports shall not be treated as negligible if there is a
[[Page 7071]]
potential that subject imports from a country will imminently exceed
the statutory requirements for negligibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See Statement of Administrative Action (SAA), H.R. Doc. No.
103-316, Vol. 1, (1994) (SAA), at 857; see also Volume I of the
Petitions, at I-29--I-34 and Exhibits I-17--I-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by reduced market share; decline in shipments, production,
and capacity utilization; underselling and price suppression or
depression; reduced employment variables; lost sales and revenues; and
decline in financial performance.\36\ We assessed the allegations and
supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat of material
injury, and causation, and we have determined that these allegations
are properly supported by adequate evidence and meet the statutory
requirements for initiation.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at I-18 through I-22, I-24
through I-61 and Exhibits I-14, I-15, I-17 through I-37; see also
General Issues Supplement, at 1-3 and Exhibits I-SQ-1 and I-SQ-4.
\37\ See India CVD Initiation Checklist, PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist, and Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment
III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India, the
People's Republic of China, and Sri Lanka.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires the Department to initiate a
CVD investigation whenever an interested party filed a CVD petition on
behalf of an industry that: (1) Alleges elements necessary for an
imposition of a duty under section 701(a) of the Act; and (2) is
accompanied by information reasonably available to Petitioner
supporting the allegations.
Petitioners allege that producers/exporters of off road tires in
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka benefit from countervailable subsidies
bestowed by the GOI, GOC, and GOSL, respectively. The Department
examined the Petitions and finds that they comply with the requirements
of section 702(b)(1) of the Act. Therefore, in accordance with section
702(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating CVD investigations to determine
whether manufacturers, producers, or exporters of off road tires from
India, the PRC, and Sri Lanka receive countervailable subsidies from
the GOI, GOC, and GOSL, respectively.
On June 29, 2015, the President of the United States signed into
law the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, which made numerous
amendments to the AD and CVD law.\38\ The 2015 law does not specify
dates of application for those amendments. On August 6, 2015, the
Department published an interpretative rule, in which it announced the
applicability dates for each amendment to the Act, except for
amendments contained in section 771(7) of the Act, which relate to
determinations of material injury by the ITC.\39\ The amendments to
sections 771(15), 773, 776, and 782 of the Act are applicable to all
determinations made on or after August 6, 2015, and, therefore, apply
to these CVD investigations.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law
114-27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
\39\ See Dates of Application of Amendments to the Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Laws Made by the Trade Preferences Extension
Act of 2015, 80 FR 46793 (August 6, 2015) (Applicability Notice).
\40\ Id., at 46794-95. The 2015 amendments may be found at
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1295/text/pl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
India
Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 27 of the 29
alleged programs in India.\41\ For a full discussion of the basis for
our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the India
CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ See India CVD Initiation Checklist for a more detailed
explanation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC
Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on all 38
alleged programs in the PRC.\42\ For a full discussion of the basis for
our decision to initiate on each program, see the PRC CVD Initiation
Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist for a more detailed
explanation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sri Lanka
Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 16 of the 22
alleged programs in Sri Lanka.\43\ For a full discussion of the basis
for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see Sri
Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See Sri Lanka CVD Initiation Checklist for a more detailed
explanation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A public version of the initiation checklists for each
investigation is available on ACCESS.
In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary
determination no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation.
Respondent Selection
Petitioners named six companies as producers/exporters of off road
tires from India and 17 from Sri Lanka.\44\ Following standard practice
in CVD investigations, for the India and Sri Lanka CVD cases, the
Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of off road tires during
the periods of investigation under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States numbers listed in the scope of Appendix
I, below. We intend to release CBP data under Administrative Protective
Order (APO) to all parties with access to information protected by APO
within five business days of publication of this Federal Register
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at Exhibits I-13 and I-36.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties wishing to comment regarding the CBP data and/or
respondent selection for India and Sri Lanka must do so within seven
calendar days after the placement of the CBP data on the record of this
investigation. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments should
submit those comments five calendar days after the deadline for the
initial comments. An electronically-filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. ET by the date noted above. We intend to
make our decision regarding respondent selection within 20 days of
publication of this notice.
With respect to the PRC, Petitioners named 28 companies as
producers/exporters of off road tires.\45\ Because of the existing CVD
order on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the PRC, the
Department is giving further consideration to the appropriate
methodology for selecting respondents in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ See Volume I of the Petition at Exhibit I-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petitions have been
provided to the GOI, GOC, and GOSL via ACCESS. To the extent
practicable, we will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of
the Petitions to each exporter named in the Petitions, as provided
under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
We will notify the ITC of our initiation, as required by section
702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determinations by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petitions were filed, whether there
[[Page 7072]]
is a reasonable indication that imports of off road tires from India,
the PRC, and Sri Lanka are materially injuring, or threatening material
injury to, a U.S. industry.\46\ A negative ITC determination for any
country will result in the investigation being terminated with respect
to that country; \47\ otherwise, these investigations will proceed
according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See section 703(a)(2) of the Act.
\47\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence
placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than
factual information described in (i)-(iv). Any party, when submitting
factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR
351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted \48\ and, if the
information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual
information already on the record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on the record that the factual
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.\49\ Time limits for
the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301,
which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Parties should review the regulations
prior to submitting factual information in these investigations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\49\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extension of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351, or as
otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request
will be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the
time limit established under 19 CFR 351 expires. For submissions that
are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due
date. Under certain circumstances, we may elect to specify a different
time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for
submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such
a case, we will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting
forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension
requests must be filed to be considered timely. An extension request
must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission; under limited
circumstances we will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension
of time limits. Review Extension of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR
57790 (September 20, 2013), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual
information in these investigations.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\50\
Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are
in effect for company/government officials, as well as their
representatives. Investigations initiated on the basis of petitions
filed on or after August 16, 2013, and other segments of any AD or CVD
proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the
formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final
Rule.\51\ The Department intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable revised
certification requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\51\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the
Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate in these investigations
should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures
(e.g., the filing of letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: February 3, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigations
The scope of these investigations is certain new pneumatic off-
the-road tires (certain off road tires). Certain off road tires are
tires with an off road tire size designation. The tires included in
the scope may be either tube-type \52\ or tubeless, radial, or non-
radial, regardless of whether for original equipment manufacturers
or the replacement market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ While tube-type tires are subject to the scope of these
proceedings, tubes and flaps are not subject merchandise and
therefore are not covered by the scope of these proceedings,
regardless of the manner in which they are sold (e.g., sold with or
separately from subject merchandise).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject tires may have the following prefix or suffix
designation, which appears on the sidewall of the tire:
Prefix designations:
DH--Identifies a tire intended for agricultural and logging service
which must be mounted on a DH drop center rim.
VA--Identifies a tire intended for agricultural and logging service
which must be mounted on a VA multipiece rim.
IF--Identifies an agricultural tire to operate at 20 percent higher
rated load than standard metric tires at the same inflation
pressure.
VF--Identifies an agricultural tire to operate at 40 percent higher
rated load than standard metric tires at the same inflation
pressure.
Suffix designations:
ML--Mining and logging tires used in intermittent highway service.
DT--Tires primarily designed for sand and paver service.
NHS--Not for Highway Service.
TG--Tractor Grader, off-the-road tire for use on rims having bead
seats with nominal +0.188'' diameter (not for highway service).
K--Compactor tire for use on 5[deg] drop center or semi-drop center
rims having bead seats with nominal minus 0.032 diameter.
IND--Drive wheel tractor tire used in industrial service.
SL--Service limited to agricultural usage.
FI--Implement tire for agricultural towed highway service.
CFO--Cyclic Field Operation.
SS--Differentiates tires for off-highway vehicles such as mini and
skid-steer loaders from other tires which use similar size
designations such as 7.00-15TR and 7.00-15NHS, but may use different
rim bead seat configurations.
All tires marked with any of the prefixes or suffixes listed
above in their sidewall markings are covered by the scope regardless
of their intended use.
In addition, all tires that lack any of the prefixes or suffixes
listed above in their sidewall markings are included in the scope,
regardless of their intended use, as long as the tire is of a size
that is among the numerical size designations listed in the
following sections of the Tire and Rim
[[Page 7073]]
Association Year Book, as updated annually, unless the tire falls
within one of the specific exclusions set forth below. The sections
of the Tire and Rim Association Year Book listing numerical size
designations of covered certain off road tires include:
The table of mining and logging tires included in the section on
Truck-Bus tires;
The entire section on Off-the-Road tires;
The entire section on Agricultural tires; and
The following tables in the section on Industrial/ATV/Special
Trailer tires:
Industrial, Mining, Counterbalanced Lift Truck (Smooth
Floors Only);
Industrial and Mining (Other than Smooth Floors);
Construction Equipment;
Off-the-Road and Counterbalanced Lift Truck (Smooth
Floors Only);
Aerial Lift and Mobile Crane; and
Utility Vehicle and Lawn and Garden Tractor.
Certain off road tires, whether or not mounted on wheels or
rims, are included in the scope. However, if a subject tire is
imported mounted on a wheel or rim, only the tire is covered by the
scope. Subject merchandise includes certain off road tires produced
in the subject countries whether mounted on wheels or rims in a
subject country or in a third country. Certain off road tires are
covered whether or not they are accompanied by other parts, e.g., a
wheel, rim, axle parts, bolts, nuts, etc. Certain off road tires
that enter attached to a vehicle are not covered by the scope.
Excluded from the scope of these investigations are any products
covered by the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders
on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's
Republic of China. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order, 73 FR 51624 (September 4, 2008); Certain New Pneumatic Off-
the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Countervailing
Duty Order, 73 FR 51627 (September 4, 2008).\53\
\53\ In these prior investigations, the Department found that
imports of off road tires mounted on wheels were not within the
scope of subject merchandise. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road
Tires from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Partial
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR 40485
(July 15, 2008) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, specifically excluded from the scope are passenger
vehicle and light truck tires, racing tires, mobile home tires,
motorcycle tires, all-terrain vehicle tires, bicycle tires, on-road
or on-highway trailer tires, and truck and bus tires. Such tires
generally have in common that the symbol ``DOT'' must appear on the
sidewall, certifying that the tire conforms to applicable motor
vehicle safety standards. Such excluded tires may also have the
following prefixes and suffixes included as part of the size
designation on their sidewalls:
Prefix letter designations:
AT--Identifies a tire intended for service on All-Terrain Vehicles;
P--Identifies a tire intended primarily for service on passenger
cars;
LT--Identifies a tire intended primarily for service on light
trucks;
T--Identifies a tire intended for one-position ``temporary use'' as
a spare only; and
ST--Identifies a special tire for trailers in highway service.
Suffix letter designations:
TR--Identifies a tire for service on trucks, buses, and other
vehicles with rims having specified rim diameter of nominal plus
0.156'' or plus 0.250'';
MH--Identifies tires for Mobile Homes;
HC--Identifies a heavy duty tire designated for use on ``HC'' 15''
tapered rims used on trucks, buses, and other vehicles. This suffix
is intended to differentiate among tires for light trucks, and other
vehicles or other services, which use a similar designation.
Example: 8R17.5 LT, 8R17.5 HC;
LT--Identifies light truck tires for service on trucks, buses,
trailers, and multipurpose passenger vehicles used in nominal
highway service;
ST--Special tires for trailers in highway service; and
M/C--Identifies tires and rims for motorcycles.
The following types of tires are also excluded from the scope:
Pneumatic tires that are not new, including recycled or retreaded
tires and used tires; non-pneumatic tires, including solid rubber
tires; aircraft tires; and turf, lawn and garden, and golf tires.
Also excluded from the scope are mining and construction tires that
have a rim diameter equal to or exceeding 39 inches. Such tires may
be distinguished from other tires of similar size by the number of
plies that the construction and mining tires contain (minimum of 16)
and the weight of such tires (minimum 1500 pounds).
The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
4011.20.1025, 4011.20.1035, 4011.20.5030, 4011.20.5050,
4011.61.0000, 4011.62.0000, 4011.63.0000, 4011.69.0050,
4011.92.0000, 4011.93.4000, 4011.93.8000, 4011.94.4000,
4011.94.8000, 8431.49.9038, 8431.49.9090, 8709.90.0020, and
8716.90.1020. Tires meeting the scope description may also enter
under the following HTSUS subheadings: 4011.99.4550, 4011.99.8550,
8424.90.9080, 8431.20.0000, 8431.39.0010, 8431.49.1090,
8431.49.9030, 8432.90.0005, 8432.90.0015, 8432.90.0030,
8432.90.0080, 8433.90.5010, 8503.00.9560, 8708.70.0500,
8708.70.2500, 8708.70.4530, 8716.90.5035 and 8716.90.5055. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the subject merchandise is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016-02713 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
