Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees, 5806-5807 [2016-01927]
Download as PDF
5806
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–12 and should be
submitted on or before February 24,
2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–01932 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–76990; File No. SR–ISE–
2016–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of
Fees
January 28, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
19, 2016 the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend the
Schedule of Fees to rename its Payment
for Order Flow program. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Feb 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
10 17
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The Exchange administers a payment
for order flow (‘‘PFOF’’) program that
helps Market Makers 3 establish PFOF
arrangements with Electronic Access
Members (‘‘EAMs’’) in exchange for
those EAMs routing some or all of their
order flow to the Market Maker. This
PFOF program is funded through a fee
of $0.70 per contract,4 which is paid by
ISE Market Makers for each regular
Priority Customer 5 contract executed in
Non-Select Symbols.6 The Exchange
now proposes to rename the PFOF fee
to ‘‘marketing fee’’ to keep the name of
this program consistent with usage on
other options markets that have adopted
this terminology. The Exchange is not
proposing any substantive changes to
this program.
3 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively. See Rule 100(a)(25).
4 The fee is waived in FX Options, Flash Orders,
and for Complex Orders in all symbols. The PFOF
fee is rebated proportionately to the members that
paid the fee such that on a monthly basis the PFOF
fund balance administered by a Primary Market
Maker for a Group of options established under
Rule 802(b) does not exceed $100,000 and the PFOF
fund balance administered by a preferenced
Competitive Market Maker for such a Group does
not exceed $100,000. A preferenced Competitive
Market Maker that elects not to administer a fund
will not be charged the PFOF fee.
The Exchange assesses an administrative fee of
0.45% on the total amount of the funds collected
each month.
5 A ‘‘Priority Customer’’ is a person or entity that
is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does not
place more than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s), as defined in Rule
100(a)(37A).
6 ‘‘Non-Select Symbols’’ are options overlying all
symbols excluding Select Symbols. The Schedule of
Fees currently states that PFOF is applicable to
‘‘Non-Penny Pilot Symbols,’’ which is an outdated
term. The Exchange therefore proposes to update
the Schedule of Fees to refer instead to ‘‘Non-Select
Symbols.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.7
In particular, the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 because
it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change makes a non-substantive change
to the name of the PFOF program
operated by the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that this change will
be beneficial for members and investors
who already use this term with respect
to trading on other options markets that
have already adopted this terminology.
The Exchange further notes that the
marketing fee program will continue to
operate exactly as it does today.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,9 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is a nonsubstantive name change and is
therefore not designed to have any
competitive impact.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
8 15
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.11
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 12 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 13
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The proposed rule change
modifies the name of the PFOF program
operated by the Exchange in a manner
that is consistent with terminology used
on other options markets.14 Because the
proposal does not raise any new or
novel issues and only involves a nonmaterial change in terminology, the
Commission believes the waiver of the
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Therefore, the Commission
hereby waives the operative delay and
designates the proposal operative upon
filing.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
14 See e.g., Chicago Board Options Exchange Fee
Schedule, available at https://www.cboe.com/
publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf.
15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Feb 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
5807
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–76983; File No. SR–NYSE–
2015–48]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2016–04 on the subject
line.
January 28, 2016.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2016–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2016–04, and should be submitted on or
before February 24, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–01927 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
16 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change
Deleting Rule 410B Governing
Reporting Requirements for OffExchange Transactions
Sfmt 4703
I. Introduction
On October 16, 2015, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
delete Rule 410B governing reporting
requirements for off-Exchange
transactions. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 2, 2015.3
The Commission received no comment
letters on the proposed rule change. On
December 16, 2015, the Commission
designated a longer period within which
to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.4 The Commission
is approving the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The Exchange proposes to delete Rule
410B, which sets forth certain regulatory
reporting requirements for member or
member organizations effecting offExchange transactions in Exchange
listed securities that are not reported to
the Consolidated Tape, and to make
conforming amendments to Rule 476A
to delete a reference to Rule 410B. The
Exchange represents that Rule 410B is
no longer necessary in light of changes
in trade reporting and regulatory
requirements that have been put in
place since the Exchange adopted Rule
410B.
Changes to Regulatory Landscape
On July 30, 2007, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’), NYSE, and NYSE
Regulation, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Regulation’’)
consolidated their member firm
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76277
(October 27, 2015), 80 FR 67443.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76666,
80 FR 79644 (December 22, 2015).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5806-5807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01927]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76990; File No. SR-ISE-2016-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees
January 28, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 19, 2016 the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I
and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees to rename its
Payment for Order Flow program. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.ise.com), at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange administers a payment for order flow (``PFOF'')
program that helps Market Makers \3\ establish PFOF arrangements with
Electronic Access Members (``EAMs'') in exchange for those EAMs routing
some or all of their order flow to the Market Maker. This PFOF program
is funded through a fee of $0.70 per contract,\4\ which is paid by ISE
Market Makers for each regular Priority Customer \5\ contract executed
in Non-Select Symbols.\6\ The Exchange now proposes to rename the PFOF
fee to ``marketing fee'' to keep the name of this program consistent
with usage on other options markets that have adopted this terminology.
The Exchange is not proposing any substantive changes to this program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See Rule
100(a)(25).
\4\ The fee is waived in FX Options, Flash Orders, and for
Complex Orders in all symbols. The PFOF fee is rebated
proportionately to the members that paid the fee such that on a
monthly basis the PFOF fund balance administered by a Primary Market
Maker for a Group of options established under Rule 802(b) does not
exceed $100,000 and the PFOF fund balance administered by a
preferenced Competitive Market Maker for such a Group does not
exceed $100,000. A preferenced Competitive Market Maker that elects
not to administer a fund will not be charged the PFOF fee.
The Exchange assesses an administrative fee of 0.45% on the
total amount of the funds collected each month.
\5\ A ``Priority Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s), as defined in Rule 100(a)(37A).
\6\ ``Non-Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols
excluding Select Symbols. The Schedule of Fees currently states that
PFOF is applicable to ``Non-Penny Pilot Symbols,'' which is an
outdated term. The Exchange therefore proposes to update the
Schedule of Fees to refer instead to ``Non-Select Symbols.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ In
particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\8\ because it is designed to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free
and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change
makes a non-substantive change to the name of the PFOF program operated
by the Exchange. The Exchange believes that this change will be
beneficial for members and investors who already use this term with
respect to trading on other options markets that have already adopted
this terminology. The Exchange further notes that the marketing fee
program will continue to operate exactly as it does today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\9\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change is a non-substantive name change and is therefore not
designed to have any competitive impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
[[Page 5807]]
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \12\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \13\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The proposed
rule change modifies the name of the PFOF program operated by the
Exchange in a manner that is consistent with terminology used on other
options markets.\14\ Because the proposal does not raise any new or
novel issues and only involves a non-material change in terminology,
the Commission believes the waiver of the operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\14\ See e.g., Chicago Board Options Exchange Fee Schedule,
available at https://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf.
\15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2016-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2016-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2016-04, and should be
submitted on or before February 24, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01927 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P