Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Postponement of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 4255-4256 [2016-01566]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES information will be deemed to be nonconfidential. An original and five (5) copies, plus two (2) copies of the nonconfidential version, should be submitted no later than 20 days after the date of this notice to: Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 21028, Washington, DC 20230. Information submitted by any person is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). However, nonconfidential versions of the comments will be made available to the applicant if necessary for determining whether or not to issue the amended Certificate. Comments should refer to this application as ‘‘Export Trade Certificate of Review, application number 97–13A03.’’ Summary of the Application Applicant: Association for the Administration of Rice Quotas, Inc. Contact: c/o Matthew R. Elkin and Peter G. Mattocks, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2020 K Street NW., Washington DC 20006. Application No.: 97–13A03. Date Deemed Submitted: January 11, 2016. AARQ seeks to amend its Certificate by making the following changes to the list of Members covered by the Certificate: 1. Deleting the following Members from its Certificate: a. Family & Sons, Inc., Miami, Florida b. Noble Logistics USA, Inc., Portland Oregon c. Rickmers Rice USA, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee d. Texana Rice, Inc., Louise, Texas 2. Changing Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd., Santa Fe Springs, California (a subsidiary of Nishimoto Trading Company, Ltd. (Japan) to Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd. dba Wismettac Asian Foods, Santa Fe Springs, California (a subsidiary of Nishimoto Trading Company, Ltd. (Japan) 3. Changing PS International, LLC dba PS International Ltd., Chapel Hill, North Carolina (jointly owned by Seaboard Corporation, Kansas City Missouri and PS Trading Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina) to Interra International, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 4. Changing TRC Trading Corporation, Roseville, California (a subsidiary of TRC Group Inc., Roseville, California) and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Arkansas II, LLC, Houston, Texas to TRC Trading Corporation, Roseville, California (a subsidiary of VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:57 Jan 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 TRC Group Inc., Roseville, California) and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Arkansas II, LLC, Crawfordsville, Arkansas 5. Changing Veetee Rice, Inc., Great Neck, New York (a subsidiary of Veetee Investments Corporation (Bahamas)) to Veetee Foods Inc., Islandia, New York (a subsidiary of Veetee Investments Corporation (Bahamas)) AARQ’s proposed amendment of its Export Trade Certificate of Review would result in the following entities as Members under the Certificate: 1. ADM Latin, Inc., Decatur, Illinois, ADM Grain Company, Decatur, Illinois, and ADM Rice, Inc., Tarrytown, New York (subsidiaries of Archer Daniels Midland Company) 2. American Commodity Company, LLC, Williams, California 3. Associated Rice Marketing Cooperative (ARMCO), Richvale, California 4. Bunge Milling, Saint Louis, Missouri (a subsidiary of Bunge North America, White Plains, New York), dba PIRMI (Pacific International Rice Mills), Woodland, California 5. Cargill Americas, Inc., and its subsidiary CAI Trading, LLC, Coral Gables, Florida 6. Farmers’ Rice Cooperative, Sacramento, California 7. Farmers Rice Milling Company, Inc., Lake Charles, Louisiana 8. Far West Rice, Inc., Durham, California 9. Gulf Pacific Rice Co., Inc., Houston, Texas; Gulf Rice Milling, Inc., Houston, Texas; and Harvest Rice, Inc., McGehee, Arkansas (each a subsidiary of Gulf Pacific, Inc., Houston, Texas) 10. Gulf Pacific Disc, Inc., Houston, Texas 11. Itochu International Inc., Portland, Oregon (a subsidiary of Itochu Corporation (Japan)) 12. JFC International Inc., Los Angeles, California (a subsidiary of Kikkoman Corp.) 13. JIT Products, Inc., Davis, California 14. Kennedy Rice Dryers, L.L.C., Mer Rouge, Louisiana 15. Kitoku America, Inc., Burlingame, California (a subsidiary of Kitoku Shinryo Co., Ltd. (Japan)) 16. LD Commodities Rice Merchandising LLC, Wilton, Connecticut, and LD Commodities Interior Rice Merchandising LLC, Kansas City, Missouri (subsidiaries of Louis Dreyfus Commodities LLC, Wilton, Connecticut) 17. Louisiana Rice Mill, LLC, Mermentau, Louisiana PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4255 18. Nidera US LLC, Wilton, Connecticut (a subsidiary of Nidera BV (Netherlands)) 19. Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd. dba Wismettac Asian Foods, Santa Fe Springs, California (a subsidiary of Nishimoto Trading Company, Ltd. (Japan) 20. Producers Rice Mill, Inc., Stuttgart, Arkansas 21. Interra International, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 22. Riceland Foods, Inc., Stuttgart, Arkansas 23. Riviana Foods Inc., Houston, Texas (a subsidiary of Ebro Foods, S.A. (Spain)), for the activities of itself and its subsidiary, American Rice, Inc., Houston, Texas 24. Sinamco Trading Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota 25. SunFoods LLC, Woodland, California 26. SunWest Foods, Inc., Davis, California 27. The Sun Valley Rice Co., LLC, Arbuckle, California 28. TRC Trading Corporation, Roseville, California (a subsidiary of TRC Group Inc., Roseville, California) and its subsidiary Gulf Rice Arkansas II, LLC, Crawfordsville, Arkansas 29. Veetee Foods Inc., Islandia, New York (a subsidiary of Veetee Investments Corporation (Bahamas)) 30. Wehah Farm, Inc., dba Lundberg Family Farms, Richvale, California Dated: January 20, 2016. Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration. [FR Doc. 2016–01570 Filed 1–25–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–856] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Postponement of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is postponing the deadline for issuing the final determination in the less-than-fair-value (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (‘‘corrosion-resistant steel’’) from Taiwan. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1 4256 DATES: Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Notices Effective Date: January 26, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Medley at (202) 482–4987, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 30, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of the LTFV investigations of certain corrosionresistant steel from Italy, India, the People’s Republic of China, Korea, and Taiwan.1 The period of investigation is April 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015. On January 4, 2016, the Department published its negative Preliminary Determination in the LTFV investigation of corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan.2 On December 28, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, with the concurrence of ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., California Steel Industries, and United States Steel Corporation (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’), requested that the Department postpone its final determination to align with the deadlines of the other investigations of corrosion-resistant steel from the People’s Republic of China, India, Italy, and Korea.3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Postponement of Final Determination Section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i), provide that a final determination may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of a negative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by the petitioner. In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i), because (1) our preliminary determination was negative; (2) the request was made by Petitioners; and (3) no compelling reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination until no later than 135 days after the publication of the Preliminary Determination (i.e., to May 1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Italy, India, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 37228 (June 30, 2015). 2 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Negative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 72 (January 4, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 3 See the letter from AK Steel Corporation entitled, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Request For Postponement Of The Final Determination,’’ dated December 28, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:57 Jan 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 18, 2016), in alignment with the deadlines of the other investigations of corrosion-resistant steel from the People’s Republic of China, India, Italy, and Korea.4 Accordingly, we will issue our final determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(g). Dated: January 13, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–01566 Filed 1–25–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–601] Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative; 2008–2009 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 21, 2015, the United States Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’ or ‘‘Court’’) issued its final judgment 1 sustaining the Department of Commerce’s (the ‘‘Department’’) final results of redetermination 2 issued pursuant to the CIT’s remand order in Peer Bearing Co.-Changshan v. United States, 986 F. Supp. 2d 1389 (CIT 2014) (‘‘CPZ 08–09 II’’), with respect to the Department’s final results 3 of the twenty-second administrative review of AGENCY: 4 See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Italy: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 69 (January 4, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 1 See, Peer Bearing Company—Changshan v. United States, Consol. Court No. 11–00022, Slip Op. 15–143 (CIT 2015) (‘‘CPZ 08–09 III’’), and accompanying judgment order. 2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Peer Bearing Company— Changshan v. United States, Consol. Court No. 11– 00022, Slip Op. 14–62 (CIT 2014) (‘‘Second Remand Redetermination’’). 3 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 2008–2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 3086 (January 19, 2011) (‘‘Final Results’’) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (‘‘IDM’’). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (‘‘TRBs’’), from People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s Final Results and is amending the Final Results with respect to the dumping margins determined for Peer Bearing Company– Changshan and Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd.4 DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith A. Haynes, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 21, 2012, the Court issued its initial opinion and remanded the Final Results, ordering that the Department: (1) redetermine the surrogate value (‘‘SV’’) applied to PBCD/CPZ’s input of bearing-quality steel bar; (2) reconsider its determination to calculate the normal value (‘‘NV’’) of subject merchandise that was imported by PBCD/Peer prior to its acquisition by SKF, but sold by SKF/Peer subsequent to the acquisition, using SKF/CPZ’s factors of production (‘‘FOPs’’); and (3) reconsider, and modify as appropriate, its determination of the country of 4 Prior to September 11, 2008, Peer Bearing Company-Changshan was majority-owned by the Spungen family (‘‘PBCD/CPZ’’). On September 11, 2008, two and a half months into the period of review (‘‘POR’’), PBCD/CPZ, the sole respondent in the prior 2007–2008 POR, and its Illinois-based U.S. sales affiliate, Peer Bearing Company (‘‘PBCD/ Peer’’) (collectively, ‘‘PBCD’’), were each purchased by certain companies owned by SKF. In the underlying review, we found that the postacquisition respondent was not the successor-ininterest to the pre-acquisition respondent and, thus, were each legally distinct entities for the purposes of this antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) review. The postacquisition respondent is referred to as the SKFowned Changshan Peer Bearing Company, Ltd. (‘‘SKF/CPZ’’) and its Illinois-based affiliate is referred to as Peer Bearing Company (‘‘SKF/Peer’’) (collectively ‘‘SKF’’). For ease of reference, the two respondents are referred to by their collective names ‘‘PBCD’’ and ‘‘SKF’’ throughout this document. For the purpose of generally referencing the physical facilities in question during the POR in its entirety, without consideration of ownership, the Changshan-based TRB production facility is referred to as ‘‘CPZ’’ and the Illinois-based U.S. sales affiliate is referred to as ‘‘Peer.’’ E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4255-4256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-856]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: 
Postponement of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is postponing the 
deadline for issuing the final determination in the less-than-fair-
value (``LTFV'') investigation of certain corrosion-resistant steel 
products (``corrosion-resistant steel'') from Taiwan.

[[Page 4256]]


DATES: Effective Date: January 26, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Medley at (202) 482-4987, 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 30, 2015, the Department published a 
notice of initiation of the LTFV investigations of certain corrosion-
resistant steel from Italy, India, the People's Republic of China, 
Korea, and Taiwan.\1\ The period of investigation is April 1, 2014, 
through March 31, 2015. On January 4, 2016, the Department published 
its negative Preliminary Determination in the LTFV investigation of 
corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan.\2\ On December 28, 2015, AK 
Steel Corporation, with the concurrence of ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor 
Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., California Steel Industries, and 
United States Steel Corporation (collectively ``Petitioners''), 
requested that the Department postpone its final determination to align 
with the deadlines of the other investigations of corrosion-resistant 
steel from the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, and Korea.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Italy, 
India, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and 
Taiwan: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 
37228 (June 30, 2015).
    \2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 
Negative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 
81 FR 72 (January 4, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (``Preliminary Determination'').
    \3\ See the letter from AK Steel Corporation entitled, ``Certain 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Request For 
Postponement Of The Final Determination,'' dated December 28, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Postponement of Final Determination

    Section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i), provide that a final determination 
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the 
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of a 
negative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is 
made by the petitioner. In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(B) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i), because (1) our preliminary 
determination was negative; (2) the request was made by Petitioners; 
and (3) no compelling reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the 
final determination until no later than 135 days after the publication 
of the Preliminary Determination (i.e., to May 18, 2016), in alignment 
with the deadlines of the other investigations of corrosion-resistant 
steel from the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, and Korea.\4\ 
Accordingly, we will issue our final determination no later than 135 
days after the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From 
Italy: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 69 
(January 4, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 
735(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(g).

    Dated: January 13, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-01566 Filed 1-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.