Comment Request for Information Collection for the Evaluation of the Disability Employment Initiative Round 5 and Future Rounds, 1446-1448 [2016-00460]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
1446
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices
issues raised in the submission have not
been remedied to date. OTLA has not
received similar submissions related to
the NAALC obligations of the GOM.
Accordingly, OTLA has accepted the
submission for review.
OTLA’s decision to accept the
submission for review is not intended to
indicate any determination as to the
validity or accuracy of the allegations
contained in the submission. The
objective of the review will be to gather
information so that OTLA can better
understand the allegations contained in
the submission and to publicly report
on the issues raised therein. As set out
in the Procedural Guidelines, OTLA
will complete the review and issue a
public report to the Secretary of Labor
within 180 days, unless circumstances,
as determined by OTLA, require an
extension of time. The public report will
include a summary of the review
process, as well as any findings and
recommendations.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 7,
2016.
Carol Pier,
Deputy Undersecretary for International
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–00436 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Comment Request for Information
Collection for the Evaluation of the
Disability Employment Initiative Round
5 and Future Rounds
Office of Disability
Employment Policy, Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents is properly
assessed. Currently, the Department of
Labor is soliciting comments concerning
the collection of data about the
Evaluation of the Disability
Employment Initiative Round 5 and
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Jan 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Future Rounds. A copy of the proposed
Information Collection Request (ICR)
can be obtained by contacting the office
listed in the addressee section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
February 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either one of the following methods:
Email: hunter.cherise@dol.gov; Mail or
Courier: Office of Disability
Employment Policy, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room S–1303, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: Cherise Hunter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cherise Hunter by telephone at 202–
693–4931 (this is not a toll-free number)
or by email at hunter.cherise@dol.gov.
Copies of this notice may be obtained in
alternative formats (Large print, Braille,
Audio Tape, or Disc), upon request by
calling (202) 693–7880 (this is not a tollfree number). TTY/TTD callers may dial
(202) 693–7881 to obtain information or
to request materials in alternative
formats.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The proposed information collection
activities described in this notice will
provide data for an impact and
implementation evaluation of the
Disability Employment Initiative Round
5 and future rounds (DEI R5FR). The
DEI was first funded by the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL),
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) and Office of
Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) in
2010. DEI was designed to improve
educational, training and employment
opportunities and outcomes of youth
and adults with disabilities who are
unemployed, underemployed and/or
receiving Social Security Disability
Income (SSDI), by refining and
expanding already identified successful
public workforce strategies; improving
coordination and collaboration among
employment and training and asset
development programs implemented at
state and local levels, including the
expansion of the public workforce
investment system’s capacity to serve as
Ticket to Work (TTW) Employment
Networks (ENs) under the Social
Security Administration’s (SSA) TTW
Program; and build effective community
partnerships that leverage public and
private resources to better serve
individuals with disabilities and
improve employment outcomes.
Thirty-one grants in Rounds 1–4 were
awarded from September 2010 to
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
September 2014 to state government
agencies which distributed the funds to
their local workforce investment areas’
(LWIAs) American Job Centers (AJCs) to
implement these activities. In 2014,
ETA and ODEP provided $14,837,785 to
six Round 5 grantees. Round 6 grantees
were awarded cooperative agreements
in October 2015. Since 2010, the
Department of Labor has awarded over
$95 million in grants to state workforce
agencies. DEI Rounds 1–4 focused on
the implementation of strategic service
delivery strategies including integrated
resource teams, blending and braiding
of resources, use of the Guideposts for
Success (youth grantees only),
customized employment, selfemployment and asset development
strategies. R5FR will add career
pathways to the DEI service package.
The DEI R5FR impact study will use
two distinct quasi-experimental design
(QED) study designs to determine the
impact of DEI interventions on
participant outcomes. The first study
design is a matched comparison group
design, with the treatment and
comparison conditions established at
the LWIA level. The second design will
match similar participants within the
Round 5 grantee treatment LWIAs, with
the only primary difference being
enrollment in the career pathways
component versus enrollment in other
programs and services. The
implementation study will examine the
context in which each grant is being
implemented; grantee customer
characteristics; implementation of the
DEI requirements; what the grantee’s
DEI strategies are; program
implementation challenges; and systems
change.
This Federal Register Notice provides
the opportunity to comment on three
proposed data collection instruments
that will be used in the DEI evaluation:
(1) Site visit/interviews protocols. Site
visits will occur at three points in time
and will collect information on the
current status at baseline and change in
grantees’ workforce development system
at follow-up; grantee customer
characteristics; implementation of the
grant requirements and strategies;
program implementation challenges;
and system change.
(2) Participant tracking system. For
the purposes of tracking individual DEI
Round 5 participants and collecting
information that is not collected by
Workforce Investment Act Standardized
Record Data (WIASRD) or WagnerPeyser (W–P), a Participant Tracking
System (PTS) that is independent of the
WIASRD and W–P systems will be used.
The PTS will provide DEI customer
tracking information from participating
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
1447
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices
AJCs, such as participation in specific
DEI Round 5 service delivery strategies.
It will also allow for the identification
of the DEI participants from each state
and LWIA. Additionally, it will provide
a way for DEI grantees to collect
information without modifying their
existing WIASRD or W–P systems.
(3) Survey on Disability Type,
Activities of Daily Living and Selected
Outcomes Related to Career Pathways
will provide a descriptive picture of the
range of disabilities that participants
disclose, but will also provide a more
accurate match across treatment and
comparison groups in both impact
analyses in terms of disability type and
severity. It will also provide more
accurate information on outcomes,
particularly on academic outcomes that
are currently difficult to access through
existing administrative databases.
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s burden estimate of the
proposed information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
(for example, permitting electronic
submissions of responses).
II. Review Focus
III. Current Actions
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments
concerning the above data collection for
the evaluation of DEI R5FR. DOL is
particularly interested in comments that
do the following:
Agency: Department of Labor, Office
of Disability Employment Policy.
Title: Evaluation of the Disability
Employment Initiative Round 5 and
Future Rounds.
Annual Site Visits
Total Respondents: Approximately
444. On-site or telephone interviews
will be conducted with the DEI state
lead, DRC, WIB directors, AJC managers,
AJC staff members, and agency partners
and employers. A site visit to one
comparison LWIA and AJC in close
proximity to each treatment LWIA will
also be conducted. In treatment and
comparison LWIAs, approximately eight
to ten AJC DEI participants will be
asked to participate in a customer focus
group.
Frequency: Site visits will occur in
the first, second year and third years to
collect baseline (year 1), mid-term (year
2) and follow-up (year 3) data.
Average Time per Response: Partners
and employers from small entities will
participate in interviews that are 45
minutes in duration. All other
interviews will be 60 minutes in
duration.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: The
cumulative hours of burden due to the
site visits to DEI grantees for the entire
project period is 1,143.
ESTIMATED HOURS OF BURDEN DUE TO SITE VISITS
State
California
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEI State Lead
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
DRC
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
AJC Staff
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
Parents & Employers
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
WIB Director
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
Focus Groups
# of Res .....................................
Hrs/Res ......................................
Total Hours .........................
Cumulative Total Hours
20:14 Jan 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Illinois
Massachusets
Minnesota
South Dakota
Total
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
6
12
5
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
21
12
15
.5
16
.5
10
.5
14
.5
14
.5
6
.5
75
3
4
.75
4
.75
4
.75
4
.75
4
.75
4
.75
24
4.5
6
1
6
1
4
1
6
1
6
1
2
1
30
6
48
1.5
100.5
201
48
1.5
99
198
48
1.5
94
188
48
1.5
98
196
48
1.5
94
188
48
1.5
86
172
288
9
571.5
1143
Participant Tracking System
Frequency: Two times for treatment
group customers and staff.
Total Responses: 2050 respondents.
Average Time per Response: 4.8
minutes for Participant Tracking System
and 7.4 minutes for Survey of Disability
Type, Activities of Daily Living and
Selected Outcomes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Kansas
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 658.75
hours.
Survey of Disability Type, Activities of
Daily Living and Selected Outcomes
Average Time per Response: 7.4
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 505.65
hours.
Frequency: The survey will be
administered on a quarterly basis (four
times a year).
Total Responses: 2,050 respondents.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
1448
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices
ESTIMATED TOTAL BURDEN HOURS DUE TO THE PARTICIPANT TRACKING SYSTEM AND SURVEY OF DISABILITY TYPE,
ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AND SELECTED OUTCOMES
Average
burden
time per
response
(minutes)
Number of
respondents
State
Total burden
hours per
year
Total burden
hours
Participant Tracking System
California ..........................................................................................................
Kansas .............................................................................................................
Illinois ...............................................................................................................
Massachusetts .................................................................................................
Minnesota ........................................................................................................
South Dakota ...................................................................................................
620
260
515
305
275
75
4.82
4.82
4.82
4.82
4.82
4.82
100
42
83
49
44
12
199.23
83.55
165.49
98.01
88.37
24.10
Survey of Disability Type, Activities, of Daily Living and Selected Outcomes
California ..........................................................................................................
Kansas .............................................................................................................
Illinois ...............................................................................................................
Massachusetts .................................................................................................
Minnesota ........................................................................................................
South Dakota ...................................................................................................
620
260
515
305
275
75
7.40
7.40
7.40
7.40
7.40
7.40
76
32
64
38
34
9
152.93
64.13
127.03
75.23
67.83
18.50
Total ..........................................................................................................
2050
........................
582
1164.4
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: January 5, 2016.
Jennifer Sheehy,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Disability Employment Policy, U.S.
Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2016–00460 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FK–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Sunshine Act Meeting of the National
Museum and Library Services Board
Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20:14 Jan 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Katherine Maas, Program Specialist,
Institute of Museum and Library
Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone:
(202) 653–4798.
Signed: January 6, 2016.
Andrew Christopher,
Associate General Counsel.
The National Museum and
Library Services Board, which advises
the Director of the Institute of Museum
and Library Services in awarding
national awards and medals, will meet
by teleconference on February 18, 2016,
to review nominations for the 2016
National Medal for Museum and Library
Service.
DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 18,
2016, at 1 p.m. EST.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Closed. The meeting will be
closed pursuant to subsections (c)(4)
and (c)(9) of section 552b of Title 5,
United States Code because the Board
will consider information that may
disclose: Trade secrets and commercial
or financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential;
and information the premature
disclosure of which would be likely to
significantly frustrate implementation of
a proposed agency action.
STATUS:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held by
teleconference originating at the
Institute of Museum and Library
Services. 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone:
(202) 653–4676.
PLACE:
[FR Doc. 2016–00519 Filed 1–8–16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL
REVIEW BOARD
Board Meeting: February 17, 2016—
The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical
Review Board Will Meet To Discuss
DOE Research on Storage and
Transportation of High Burnup Spent
Fuel
Pursuant to its authority under
section 5051 of Public Law 100–203,
Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act
of 1987, and in accordance with its
mandate to review the technical and
scientific validity of U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) activities related to
implementing the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982 (NWPA), the U.S. Nuclear
Waste Technical Review Board will
meet in Knoxville, Tennessee, on
February 17, 2016, to review DOE
activities related to extended storage
and transportation of high burnup spent
nuclear fuel (HBF). The focus of the
meeting will be DOE research related to
determining the performance and
potential degradation of HBF during
storage and transportation, including
storage at a nuclear utility site and
subsequent transportation to a geologic
repository, as well as the potential
effects of a second period of extended
storage, possibly at an interim storage
site, followed by transportation to a
geologic repository.
The Nuclear Waste Policy
Amendments Act (NWPAA) of 1987
charges the Board with performing an
ongoing and independent evaluation of
the technical and scientific validity of
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1446-1448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00460]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Comment Request for Information Collection for the Evaluation of
the Disability Employment Initiative Round 5 and Future Rounds
AGENCY: Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents is properly assessed. Currently,
the Department of Labor is soliciting comments concerning the
collection of data about the Evaluation of the Disability Employment
Initiative Round 5 and Future Rounds. A copy of the proposed
Information Collection Request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the
office listed in the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee's section below on or before February 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following
methods: Email: hunter.cherise@dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Office of
Disability Employment Policy, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-1303,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, Attention: Cherise
Hunter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cherise Hunter by telephone at 202-
693-4931 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at
hunter.cherise@dol.gov. Copies of this notice may be obtained in
alternative formats (Large print, Braille, Audio Tape, or Disc), upon
request by calling (202) 693-7880 (this is not a toll-free number).
TTY/TTD callers may dial (202) 693-7881 to obtain information or to
request materials in alternative formats.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The proposed information collection activities described in this
notice will provide data for an impact and implementation evaluation of
the Disability Employment Initiative Round 5 and future rounds (DEI
R5FR). The DEI was first funded by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL),
Employment and Training Administration (ETA) and Office of Disability
Employment Policy (ODEP) in 2010. DEI was designed to improve
educational, training and employment opportunities and outcomes of
youth and adults with disabilities who are unemployed, underemployed
and/or receiving Social Security Disability Income (SSDI), by refining
and expanding already identified successful public workforce
strategies; improving coordination and collaboration among employment
and training and asset development programs implemented at state and
local levels, including the expansion of the public workforce
investment system's capacity to serve as Ticket to Work (TTW)
Employment Networks (ENs) under the Social Security Administration's
(SSA) TTW Program; and build effective community partnerships that
leverage public and private resources to better serve individuals with
disabilities and improve employment outcomes.
Thirty-one grants in Rounds 1-4 were awarded from September 2010 to
September 2014 to state government agencies which distributed the funds
to their local workforce investment areas' (LWIAs) American Job Centers
(AJCs) to implement these activities. In 2014, ETA and ODEP provided
$14,837,785 to six Round 5 grantees. Round 6 grantees were awarded
cooperative agreements in October 2015. Since 2010, the Department of
Labor has awarded over $95 million in grants to state workforce
agencies. DEI Rounds 1-4 focused on the implementation of strategic
service delivery strategies including integrated resource teams,
blending and braiding of resources, use of the Guideposts for Success
(youth grantees only), customized employment, self-employment and asset
development strategies. R5FR will add career pathways to the DEI
service package.
The DEI R5FR impact study will use two distinct quasi-experimental
design (QED) study designs to determine the impact of DEI interventions
on participant outcomes. The first study design is a matched comparison
group design, with the treatment and comparison conditions established
at the LWIA level. The second design will match similar participants
within the Round 5 grantee treatment LWIAs, with the only primary
difference being enrollment in the career pathways component versus
enrollment in other programs and services. The implementation study
will examine the context in which each grant is being implemented;
grantee customer characteristics; implementation of the DEI
requirements; what the grantee's DEI strategies are; program
implementation challenges; and systems change.
This Federal Register Notice provides the opportunity to comment on
three proposed data collection instruments that will be used in the DEI
evaluation:
(1) Site visit/interviews protocols. Site visits will occur at
three points in time and will collect information on the current status
at baseline and change in grantees' workforce development system at
follow-up; grantee customer characteristics; implementation of the
grant requirements and strategies; program implementation challenges;
and system change.
(2) Participant tracking system. For the purposes of tracking
individual DEI Round 5 participants and collecting information that is
not collected by Workforce Investment Act Standardized Record Data
(WIASRD) or Wagner-Peyser (W-P), a Participant Tracking System (PTS)
that is independent of the WIASRD and W-P systems will be used. The PTS
will provide DEI customer tracking information from participating
[[Page 1447]]
AJCs, such as participation in specific DEI Round 5 service delivery
strategies. It will also allow for the identification of the DEI
participants from each state and LWIA. Additionally, it will provide a
way for DEI grantees to collect information without modifying their
existing WIASRD or W-P systems.
(3) Survey on Disability Type, Activities of Daily Living and
Selected Outcomes Related to Career Pathways will provide a descriptive
picture of the range of disabilities that participants disclose, but
will also provide a more accurate match across treatment and comparison
groups in both impact analyses in terms of disability type and
severity. It will also provide more accurate information on outcomes,
particularly on academic outcomes that are currently difficult to
access through existing administrative databases.
II. Review Focus
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the above data
collection for the evaluation of DEI R5FR. DOL is particularly
interested in comments that do the following:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate of
the proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology (for example,
permitting electronic submissions of responses).
III. Current Actions
Agency: Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment
Policy.
Title: Evaluation of the Disability Employment Initiative Round 5
and Future Rounds.
Annual Site Visits
Total Respondents: Approximately 444. On-site or telephone
interviews will be conducted with the DEI state lead, DRC, WIB
directors, AJC managers, AJC staff members, and agency partners and
employers. A site visit to one comparison LWIA and AJC in close
proximity to each treatment LWIA will also be conducted. In treatment
and comparison LWIAs, approximately eight to ten AJC DEI participants
will be asked to participate in a customer focus group.
Frequency: Site visits will occur in the first, second year and
third years to collect baseline (year 1), mid-term (year 2) and follow-
up (year 3) data.
Average Time per Response: Partners and employers from small
entities will participate in interviews that are 45 minutes in
duration. All other interviews will be 60 minutes in duration.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: The cumulative hours of burden due to
the site visits to DEI grantees for the entire project period is 1,143.
Estimated Hours of Burden Due to Site Visits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State California Kansas Illinois Massachusets Minnesota South Dakota Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEI State Lead
# of Res............................................. 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Hrs/Res.............................................. 2 2 2 2 2 2 12
DRC
# of Res............................................. 5 4 4 4 2 2 21
Hrs/Res.............................................. 2 2 2 2 2 2 12
AJC Staff
# of Res............................................. 15 16 10 14 14 6 75
Hrs/Res.............................................. .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 3
Parents & Employers
# of Res............................................. 4 4 4 4 4 4 24
Hrs/Res.............................................. .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 4.5
WIB Director
# of Res............................................. 6 6 4 6 6 2 30
Hrs/Res.............................................. 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Focus Groups
# of Res............................................. 48 48 48 48 48 48 288
Hrs/Res.............................................. 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 9
Total Hours...................................... 100.5 99 94 98 94 86 571.5
Cumulative Total Hours....................... 201 198 188 196 188 172 1143
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant Tracking System
Frequency: Two times for treatment group customers and staff.
Total Responses: 2050 respondents.
Average Time per Response: 4.8 minutes for Participant Tracking
System and 7.4 minutes for Survey of Disability Type, Activities of
Daily Living and Selected Outcomes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 658.75 hours.
Survey of Disability Type, Activities of Daily Living and Selected
Outcomes
Frequency: The survey will be administered on a quarterly basis
(four times a year).
Total Responses: 2,050 respondents.
Average Time per Response: 7.4 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 505.65 hours.
[[Page 1448]]
Estimated Total Burden Hours Due to the Participant Tracking System and Survey of Disability Type, Activities of
Daily Living and Selected Outcomes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Number of time per Total burden Total burden
State respondents response hours per year hours
(minutes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant Tracking System
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California...................................... 620 4.82 100 199.23
Kansas.......................................... 260 4.82 42 83.55
Illinois........................................ 515 4.82 83 165.49
Massachusetts................................... 305 4.82 49 98.01
Minnesota....................................... 275 4.82 44 88.37
South Dakota.................................... 75 4.82 12 24.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey of Disability Type, Activities, of Daily Living and Selected Outcomes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California...................................... 620 7.40 76 152.93
Kansas.......................................... 260 7.40 32 64.13
Illinois........................................ 515 7.40 64 127.03
Massachusetts................................... 305 7.40 38 75.23
Minnesota....................................... 275 7.40 34 67.83
South Dakota.................................... 75 7.40 9 18.50
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 2050 .............. 582 1164.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: January 5, 2016.
Jennifer Sheehy,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Disability Employment Policy,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2016-00460 Filed 1-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FK-P
