Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 80376-80378 [2015-32415]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
80376
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
government-issued photo ID, driver’s license,
or passport) and to state the purpose of their
visit.
Information is also available on the
Institute’s/Center’s home page: https://
nccih.nih.gov/about/naccih/, where an
agenda and any additional information for
the meeting will be posted when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training
in Complementary and Alternative Medicine,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: December 18, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–32395 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Office of the Director, National
Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the meeting of the
Council of Councils.
The meeting will be open to the
public as indicated below, with
attendance limited to space available.
Individuals who plan to attend and
need special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
notify the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting. The open
session will be videocast and can be
accessed from the NIH Videocasting and
Podcasting Web site (https://
videocast.nih.gov).
A portion of the meeting will be
closed to the public in accordance with
the provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4), and 552b(c)(6), Title 5
U.S.C., as amended. The grant
applications and the discussions could
disclose confidential trade secrets or
commercial property such as patentable
material, and personal information
concerning individuals associated with
the grant applications, the disclosure of
which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
Name of Committee: Council of Councils.
Open: January 29, 2016.
Time: 8:15 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Agenda: Call to Order and Introductions;
Announcements; NIH Update; Creation of
Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office
in DPCPSI; Precision Medicine Initiative—
Council’s Role in Overseeing the Cohort
Advisory Panel; ORIP Strategic Plan
Presentation and Discussion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000
Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th
Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Closed: January 29, 2016.
Time: 12:45 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.
Agenda: Review of grant applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000
Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th
Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Open: January 29, 2016.
Time: 1:45 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Agenda: Common Fund Concepts (Parts 1
and 2) and Closing Remarks.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000
Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th
Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Contact Person: Franziska Grieder, DVM,
Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Director, Office of
Research Infrastructure Programs, Division of
Program Coordination, Planning, and
Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director,
NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 948,
Bethesda, MD 20892, GriederF@mail.nih.gov,
301–435–0744.
Any interested person may file written
comments with the committee by forwarding
the statement to the Contact Person listed on
this notice. The statement should include the
name, address, telephone number and when
applicable, the business or professional
affiliation of the interested person.
In the interest of security, NIH has
instituted stringent procedures for entrance
onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles,
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles
will be inspected before being allowed on
campus. Visitors will be asked to show one
form of identification (for example, a
government-issued photo ID, driver’s license,
or passport) and to state the purpose of their
visit.
Information is also available on the
Council of Council’s home page at https://
dpcpsi.nih.gov/council/ where an agenda
will be posted before the meeting date.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.14, Intramural Research
Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research
Loan Repayment Program for Individuals
from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 93.232,
Loan Repayment Program for Research
Generally; 93.39, Academic Research
Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan
Repayment Program; 93.187, Undergraduate
Scholarship Program for Individuals from
Disadvantaged Backgrounds, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: December 17, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–32396 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U. S. C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: National Outcomes Evaluation
of the Garrett Lee Smith Suicide
Prevention Program—Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health
Services (CMHS) is requesting clearance
for the revision of data collection
associated with the previously-approved
cross-site evaluation of the Garrett Lee
Smith (GLS) Youth Suicide Prevention
and Early Intervention Program (GLS
Suicide Prevention Program), now
entitled National Outcomes Evaluation
(NOE). The NOE is a proposed redesign
of the currently-approved cross-site
evaluation (OMB No. 0930–0286;
Expiration, January 2017) that builds on
prior published GLS evaluation
proximal and distal training and
aggregate findings from program
activities (e. g., Condron et al., 2014;
Walrath et al., 2015). As a result of the
vast body of information collected and
analyzed through the cross-site
evaluation of the two GLS Suicide
Prevention Programs components—the
GLS State/Tribal Program and the GLS
Campus Program—SAMHSA has
identified areas for additional
investigation and the types of inquiry
needed to move the evaluation into its
next phase.
The NOE aims to address the field’s
need for additional evidence on the
impacts of the GLS Suicide Prevention
Program in three areas: (1) Suicide
prevention training effectiveness, (2)
early identification and referral on
subsequent care follow-up and
adherence, and (3) suicide safer care
practices within health care settings.
The evaluation comprises three distinct,
but interconnected core studies—
Training, Continuity of Care (COC), and
Suicide Safer Environment (SSE). The
Training and SSE studies also have
‘‘enhanced’’ study components. Core
study data align with required program
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
activities across the State/Tribal and
Campus programs and provide
continuity with and utility of data
previously collected (implementation
and proximal outcomes). Enhanced
components use experimental and
quasi-experimental methods
(randomized controlled trial [RCT] and
retrospective cohort study designs) to
truly assess program impacts on distal
outcomes (e. g., identifications and
referrals, hospitalizations, and suicide
attempts and deaths) without undue
burden on grantees and youth. This
outcome- and impact-focused design
reflects SAMHSA’s desire to assess the
implementation, outcomes, and impacts
of the GLS program.
The NOE builds on information
collected through the four-stage crosssite evaluation approach (context,
product, process, and impact) to further
the field of suicide prevention and
mental health promotion. Of notable
importance, the design now accounts for
differences in State/Tribal and Campus
program grant funding cycles (i. e., 5year State/Tribal and 3-year Campus
programs), while also establishing
continuity with and maximizing utility
of data previously collected. Further,
the evaluation meets the legislative
requirements outlined in the GLSMA to
inform performance and
implementation of programs.
Eleven data collection activities
compose the NOE—two new
instruments, three previously-approved
instruments, and six previouslyapproved and improved instruments. As
GLS program foci differ by grantee type,
some instruments will apply to either
State/Tribal or Campus programs only.
Of the 11 instruments, 2 will be
administered with State/Tribal and
Campus grantees (tailored to grantee
type), 6 are specific to State/Tribal
grantees, and 3 pertain only to Campus
grantees.
Instrument Removals
Due to the fulfillment of data
collection goals, six currently-approved
instruments and their associated burden
will be removed. The combined
estimated annual burden for these
instruments is 4,300 hours. These
include the State/Tribal Training
Utilization and Preservation Survey
(TUP–S) Adolescent Version, Coalition
Profile, and Coalition Survey, and the
Campus Training Exit Survey (TES)
Interview Forms, Life Skills Activities
Follow-up Interview, and the Student
Awareness Intercept Survey.
Instrument Continuations
Three instruments will be
administered only in OMB Year 1 to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
finalize data collection for the current
cross-site evaluation protocol. Each
instrument was previously approved as
part of the four-stage approach (OMB
No. 0930–0286; Expiration, January
2017) and no changes are being made.
These include the State/Tribal Referral
Network Survey (RNS), TUP–S Campus
Version, and Campus Short Message
Service Survey (SMSS). Each
instrument will be discontinued once
the associated data collection
requirement has been fulfilled.
Instrument Revisions
Six currently-approved instruments
will be revised for the NOE. Each of the
instruments, or an iteration thereof, has
received approval through multiple
cross-site evaluation packages cleared
by OMB. As such, the information
gathered has been, and will continue to
be, crucial to this effort and to the field
of suicide prevention and mental health
promotion.
D Prevention Strategies Inventory
(PSI): The PSI has been updated to
enhance the utility and accuracy of the
data collected. Changes capture
different strategies implemented and
products distributed by grantee
programs, the population of focus for
each strategy, total GLS budget
expenditures, and the percent of funds
allocated by the activity type.
D Training Activity Summary Page
(TASP): New items on the TASP gather
information about the use of behavioral
rehearsal and/or role-play and resources
provided at trainings—practices that
have been found to improve retention of
knowledge and skills posttraining. In
addition, understanding how skills can
be maintained over time with materials
provided at trainings (e.g., video
reminders, wallet cards, online and
phone applications) is an area suggested
for further study (Cross et al., 2011).
D Training Utilization and
Preservation Survey (TUP–S) 3 and 6month follow up: The TUP–S has been
improved to examine posttraining
behaviors and utilization of skills by
training participants—factors known to
improve understanding of the
comprehensive training process and the
impact of training on identifications,
referrals, and service use. The survey
now requests information about training
resources received, practice
components, trainee participation in
role play, and previous suicide
prevention trainings attended;
experience intervening with a suicidal
individual (from QPR evaluation tool),
intended use of the training, and referral
behaviors; and previous contact and
quality of relationships with youth.
Broad items about training others, the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80377
use/intended use of skills, and barriers/
facilitators have been removed. The
consent-to-contact form has been
modified to add brief items about the
trainee and previous identifications/
referrals. The TUP–S will be
administered at 3 and 6 months posttraining to a random sample of training
participants via CATI (2000 ST TUP–S
3-mo/600 ST TUP–S 6-mo per year).
D Early Intervention, Referral, and
Follow-up Individual Form (EIRF–I):
The EIRF–I has been improved to gather
initial follow-up information about
youth identified as being at risk as a
result of the State/Tribal GLS program
(whether or not a service was received
after referral). In addition, EIRF–I (1)
data elements have been expanded to
include screening practices, screening
tools, and screening results of youth
identified as at-risk for suicide; (2)
response options have been expanded/
refined (i.e., setting/source of
identification, mental health and nonmental health referral locations, and
services received); (3) tribal-specific
data elements have been added; and (4)
sources of information used has been
removed.
D EIRF Screening Form (EIRF–S): Data
elements have been added to indicate
whether State/Tribal screenings were
performed at the individual- or grouplevel. New response options have been
added under ‘‘screening tool’’ and ‘‘false
positive’’ has been removed.
D Student Behavioral Health Form
(SBHF): the SBHF (formerly entitled the
MIS) has been expanded and renamed.
The Campus form has been enhanced to
include referral and follow-up
procedure questions (rather than simply
counts); numbers screened, identified at
risk, receiving suicide-specific services,
referred, and receiving follow-up; and
age and gender breakdowns of suicide
attempts and deaths. Student
enrollment/retention items have been
removed; these will be obtained through
the Integrated Postsecondary Education
Data System. The SBHF will require
closer involvement with campus
behavioral health/health providers to
gather data on procedural questions and
screenings, risk assessment, services,
referrals, and follow-ups.
Instrument Additions
Four instruments will augment the
evaluation—two are newly developed
instruments and two represent new
versions of existing instruments.
D TUP–S RCT (Baseline and 12Month versions): the TUP–S RCT refers
to versions administered as part of the
Training Study RCT. The RCT collects
TUP–S data at baseline (pre-training)
and 3, 6, and 12 months after training.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
80378
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
Because the surveys are conducted at
different times, each version refers the
participant to a specific time period. All
trainees from States/Tribes participating
in the RCT and who consent to be
contacted will be surveyed until the
desired sample size of 1332 respondents
is achieved. The consent-to-contact form
will describe the RCT and the 4
assessment periods. The consent-to-
contact form will describe the RCT and
the 4 assessment periods.
D Behavior Health Provider Survey
(BHPS): the BHPS is a new State/Tribal
data collection activity and the first to
specifically target behavioral health
providers partnering with GLS grantees.
Data will include information about
referrals for at-risk youth, SSE care
practices implemented, and client
outcomes (number of suicide attempts
and deaths). A total of 1–10 respondents
from each State/Tribal grantee’s
partnering behavioral health provider
will participate annually.
The estimated response burden to
collect this information associated with
the redesigned National Outcomes
Evaluation is as follows annualized over
the requested 3-year clearance period is
presented below:
TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED AVERAGES: RESPONDENTS, RESPONSES AND HOURS
Type of respondent
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Responses
per
respondent
Total number
of responses
Burden per
response
(hours)
Annual burden
(hours)
State/Tribal Instruments
Project Evaluator
Project Evaluator
Project Evaluator
Project Evaluator
Provider Trainee
Provider Trainee
Provider Trainee
Provider Trainee
Provider Trainee
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
Provider Trainee .................
Provider Trainee .................
Provider Stakeholder ..........
Behavioral Health Provider
PSI ......................................
TASP ..................................
EIRF–Individual Form ........
EIRF Screening Form ........
TUP–S Consent to Contact
TUP–S 3 Month Version ....
TUP–S 6 Month Version ....
TUP–S RCT BL Version ....
TUP–S RCT 3 Month
Version.
TUP–S RCT 6 Month
Version.
TUP–S RCT 12 Month
Version.
RNS ....................................
BHPS ..................................
43
43
43
43
6,000
2,000
600
444
444
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
172
172
172
172
6000
2000
600
444
444
444
1
444
26
407
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
750
250
750
750
167
500
417
417
500
129
43
129
129
1000
1000
250
185
222
444
0. 417
185
1
444
0. 417
185
1
1
26
407
0. 667
0. 750
17
305
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
750
250
667
167
083
168
56
37
28
61
........................
4,129
Campus Instruments
Project Evaluator .................
Project Evaluator .................
Project Evaluator .................
Student ................................
Student ................................
PSI ......................................
TASP ..................................
SBHF ..................................
TUP–S Campus Version ....
SMSS .................................
56
56
56
167
734
4
4
1
1
1
224
224
56
167
734
Total ..............................................................................
12,050
........................
12,902
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
* Rounded to the nearest whole number
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by January 25, 2016 to the
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U. S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb. eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Committee Management; Notice
of Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
ACTION:
Summer King,
Statistician.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2015–32415 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[Docket No. USCBP–2015–0057]
Advisory Committee on Commercial
Operations to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (COAC)
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Advisory Committee on
Commercial Operations to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (COAC) will meet
on January 13, 2016, in New Orleans,
LA. The meeting will be open to the
public.
The Advisory Committee on
Commercial Operations to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (COAC) will meet
on Wednesday, January 13, 2016, from
1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. CST. Please note
that the meeting may close early if the
committee has completed its business.
Pre-Registration: Meeting participants
may attend either in person or via
webinar after pre-registering using a
method indicated below:
For members of the public who plan
to attend the meeting in person, please
register either online at https://
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80376-80378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32415]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U. S. C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: National Outcomes Evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith Suicide
Prevention Program--Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is requesting
clearance for the revision of data collection associated with the
previously-approved cross-site evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith
(GLS) Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention Program (GLS
Suicide Prevention Program), now entitled National Outcomes Evaluation
(NOE). The NOE is a proposed redesign of the currently-approved cross-
site evaluation (OMB No. 0930-0286; Expiration, January 2017) that
builds on prior published GLS evaluation proximal and distal training
and aggregate findings from program activities (e. g., Condron et al.,
2014; Walrath et al., 2015). As a result of the vast body of
information collected and analyzed through the cross-site evaluation of
the two GLS Suicide Prevention Programs components--the GLS State/
Tribal Program and the GLS Campus Program--SAMHSA has identified areas
for additional investigation and the types of inquiry needed to move
the evaluation into its next phase.
The NOE aims to address the field's need for additional evidence on
the impacts of the GLS Suicide Prevention Program in three areas: (1)
Suicide prevention training effectiveness, (2) early identification and
referral on subsequent care follow-up and adherence, and (3) suicide
safer care practices within health care settings. The evaluation
comprises three distinct, but interconnected core studies--Training,
Continuity of Care (COC), and Suicide Safer Environment (SSE). The
Training and SSE studies also have ``enhanced'' study components. Core
study data align with required program
[[Page 80377]]
activities across the State/Tribal and Campus programs and provide
continuity with and utility of data previously collected
(implementation and proximal outcomes). Enhanced components use
experimental and quasi-experimental methods (randomized controlled
trial [RCT] and retrospective cohort study designs) to truly assess
program impacts on distal outcomes (e. g., identifications and
referrals, hospitalizations, and suicide attempts and deaths) without
undue burden on grantees and youth. This outcome- and impact-focused
design reflects SAMHSA's desire to assess the implementation, outcomes,
and impacts of the GLS program.
The NOE builds on information collected through the four-stage
cross-site evaluation approach (context, product, process, and impact)
to further the field of suicide prevention and mental health promotion.
Of notable importance, the design now accounts for differences in
State/Tribal and Campus program grant funding cycles (i. e., 5-year
State/Tribal and 3-year Campus programs), while also establishing
continuity with and maximizing utility of data previously collected.
Further, the evaluation meets the legislative requirements outlined in
the GLSMA to inform performance and implementation of programs.
Eleven data collection activities compose the NOE--two new
instruments, three previously-approved instruments, and six previously-
approved and improved instruments. As GLS program foci differ by
grantee type, some instruments will apply to either State/Tribal or
Campus programs only. Of the 11 instruments, 2 will be administered
with State/Tribal and Campus grantees (tailored to grantee type), 6 are
specific to State/Tribal grantees, and 3 pertain only to Campus
grantees.
Instrument Removals
Due to the fulfillment of data collection goals, six currently-
approved instruments and their associated burden will be removed. The
combined estimated annual burden for these instruments is 4,300 hours.
These include the State/Tribal Training Utilization and Preservation
Survey (TUP-S) Adolescent Version, Coalition Profile, and Coalition
Survey, and the Campus Training Exit Survey (TES) Interview Forms, Life
Skills Activities Follow-up Interview, and the Student Awareness
Intercept Survey.
Instrument Continuations
Three instruments will be administered only in OMB Year 1 to
finalize data collection for the current cross-site evaluation
protocol. Each instrument was previously approved as part of the four-
stage approach (OMB No. 0930-0286; Expiration, January 2017) and no
changes are being made. These include the State/Tribal Referral Network
Survey (RNS), TUP-S Campus Version, and Campus Short Message Service
Survey (SMSS). Each instrument will be discontinued once the associated
data collection requirement has been fulfilled.
Instrument Revisions
Six currently-approved instruments will be revised for the NOE.
Each of the instruments, or an iteration thereof, has received approval
through multiple cross-site evaluation packages cleared by OMB. As
such, the information gathered has been, and will continue to be,
crucial to this effort and to the field of suicide prevention and
mental health promotion.
[ssquf] Prevention Strategies Inventory (PSI): The PSI has been
updated to enhance the utility and accuracy of the data collected.
Changes capture different strategies implemented and products
distributed by grantee programs, the population of focus for each
strategy, total GLS budget expenditures, and the percent of funds
allocated by the activity type.
[ssquf] Training Activity Summary Page (TASP): New items on the
TASP gather information about the use of behavioral rehearsal and/or
role-play and resources provided at trainings--practices that have been
found to improve retention of knowledge and skills posttraining. In
addition, understanding how skills can be maintained over time with
materials provided at trainings (e.g., video reminders, wallet cards,
online and phone applications) is an area suggested for further study
(Cross et al., 2011).
[ssquf] Training Utilization and Preservation Survey (TUP-S) 3 and
6-month follow up: The TUP-S has been improved to examine posttraining
behaviors and utilization of skills by training participants--factors
known to improve understanding of the comprehensive training process
and the impact of training on identifications, referrals, and service
use. The survey now requests information about training resources
received, practice components, trainee participation in role play, and
previous suicide prevention trainings attended; experience intervening
with a suicidal individual (from QPR evaluation tool), intended use of
the training, and referral behaviors; and previous contact and quality
of relationships with youth. Broad items about training others, the
use/intended use of skills, and barriers/facilitators have been
removed. The consent-to-contact form has been modified to add brief
items about the trainee and previous identifications/referrals. The
TUP-S will be administered at 3 and 6 months post-training to a random
sample of training participants via CATI (2000 ST TUP-S 3-mo/600 ST
TUP-S 6-mo per year).
[ssquf] Early Intervention, Referral, and Follow-up Individual Form
(EIRF-I): The EIRF-I has been improved to gather initial follow-up
information about youth identified as being at risk as a result of the
State/Tribal GLS program (whether or not a service was received after
referral). In addition, EIRF-I (1) data elements have been expanded to
include screening practices, screening tools, and screening results of
youth identified as at-risk for suicide; (2) response options have been
expanded/refined (i.e., setting/source of identification, mental health
and non-mental health referral locations, and services received); (3)
tribal-specific data elements have been added; and (4) sources of
information used has been removed.
[ssquf] EIRF Screening Form (EIRF-S): Data elements have been added
to indicate whether State/Tribal screenings were performed at the
individual- or group-level. New response options have been added under
``screening tool'' and ``false positive'' has been removed.
[ssquf] Student Behavioral Health Form (SBHF): the SBHF (formerly
entitled the MIS) has been expanded and renamed. The Campus form has
been enhanced to include referral and follow-up procedure questions
(rather than simply counts); numbers screened, identified at risk,
receiving suicide-specific services, referred, and receiving follow-up;
and age and gender breakdowns of suicide attempts and deaths. Student
enrollment/retention items have been removed; these will be obtained
through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. The SBHF
will require closer involvement with campus behavioral health/health
providers to gather data on procedural questions and screenings, risk
assessment, services, referrals, and follow-ups.
Instrument Additions
Four instruments will augment the evaluation--two are newly
developed instruments and two represent new versions of existing
instruments.
[ssquf] TUP-S RCT (Baseline and 12-Month versions): the TUP-S RCT
refers to versions administered as part of the Training Study RCT. The
RCT collects TUP-S data at baseline (pre-training) and 3, 6, and 12
months after training.
[[Page 80378]]
Because the surveys are conducted at different times, each version
refers the participant to a specific time period. All trainees from
States/Tribes participating in the RCT and who consent to be contacted
will be surveyed until the desired sample size of 1332 respondents is
achieved. The consent-to-contact form will describe the RCT and the 4
assessment periods. The consent-to-contact form will describe the RCT
and the 4 assessment periods.
[ssquf] Behavior Health Provider Survey (BHPS): the BHPS is a new
State/Tribal data collection activity and the first to specifically
target behavioral health providers partnering with GLS grantees. Data
will include information about referrals for at-risk youth, SSE care
practices implemented, and client outcomes (number of suicide attempts
and deaths). A total of 1-10 respondents from each State/Tribal
grantee's partnering behavioral health provider will participate
annually.
The estimated response burden to collect this information
associated with the redesigned National Outcomes Evaluation is as
follows annualized over the requested 3-year clearance period is
presented below:
Total and Annualized Averages: Respondents, Responses and Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden per
Type of respondent Instrument Number of Responses per Total number response Annual burden
respondents respondent of responses (hours) (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Tribal Instruments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Evaluator......................... PSI......................... 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Project Evaluator......................... TASP........................ 43 4 172 0. 250 43
Project Evaluator......................... EIRF-Individual Form........ 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Project Evaluator......................... EIRF Screening Form......... 43 4 172 0. 750 129
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S Consent to Contact.... 6,000 1 6000 0. 167 1000
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S 3 Month Version....... 2,000 1 2000 0. 500 1000
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S 6 Month Version....... 600 1 600 0. 417 250
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT BL Version........ 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 3 Month Version... 444 1 444 0. 500 222
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 6 Month Version... 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Provider Trainee.......................... TUP-S RCT 12 Month Version.. 444 1 444 0. 417 185
Provider Stakeholder...................... RNS......................... 26 1 26 0. 667 17
Behavioral Health Provider................ BHPS........................ 407 1 407 0. 750 305
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Campus Instruments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Evaluator......................... PSI......................... 56 4 224 0. 750 168
Project Evaluator......................... TASP........................ 56 4 224 0. 250 56
Project Evaluator......................... SBHF........................ 56 1 56 0. 667 37
Student................................... TUP-S Campus Version........ 167 1 167 0. 167 28
Student................................... SMSS........................ 734 1 734 0. 083 61
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................................... 12,050 .............. 12,902 .............. 4,129
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rounded to the nearest whole number
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by January 25, 2016 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U. S. Postal Service, commenters are
encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb. eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments
to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2015-32415 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
