Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Delete Sections (e) Through (h) of Exchange Rule 1020, Registration and Functions of Options Specialists, 80403-80408 [2015-32383]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft
NUREG/CR, ‘‘Spent Fuel Transportation
Package Response to the Newhall Pass
Fire Scenario’’ is available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML15351A152.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
0208 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC posts all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as entering
the comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
II. Discussion
The NRC is issuing draft NUREG/CR
‘‘Spent Fuel Transportation Package
Response to the Newhall Pass Fire
Scenario.’’ This report presents analyses
that were performed to examine the
hypothetical effects on a spent fuel
transportation package from conditions
during the Newhall Pass accident in
2007. The analyses undertaken include
FDS fire modeling, physical
examination of material samples, and
fuel performance modeling using the
FRAPTRAN–1.4, FRAPCON–3.4, and
DATING codes. The estimated release
from the hypothetical scenario is below
the prescribed limit for safety.
The purpose of this notice is to
provide the public with an opportunity
to review and provide comments on
draft NUREG/CR–7207, ‘‘Spent Fuel
Transportation Package Response to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Newhall Pass Fire Scenario’’. Any
comments received will be considered
in the final version or subsequent
revisions of the draft NUREG/CR.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of December, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christian Araguas,
Chief, Containment, Structural, and Thermal
Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management,
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015–32513 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2015–0001]
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
80403
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0739, by
videophone at 240–428–3217, or by
email at Kimberly.Meyer-Chambers@
nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
Members of the public may request to
receive this information electronically.
If you would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301–
415–1969), or email
Brenda.Akstulewicz@nrc.gov or
Patricia.Jimenez@nrc.gov.
Week of December 21, 2015.
Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public.
Dated: December 22, 2015.
Glenn Ellmers,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
Week of December 21, 2015
[FR Doc. 2015–32635 Filed 12–22–15; 4:15 pm]
DATE:
PLACE:
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
10:30 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public
Meeting) (Tentative)
(a) Aerotest Operations, Inc.—
Application for Indirect License
Transfer (Tentative)
(b) DTE Electric Company (Fermi
Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2),
Motion to Reopen and Propose New
Contention Regarding Continued
Storage (Tentative)
*
*
*
*
*
The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. For more information or to verify
the status of meetings, contact Denise
McGovern at 301–415–0681 or via email
at Denise.McGovern@nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
Additional Information
By a vote of 4–0 on December 22,
2015, the Commission determined
pursuant to U.S.C. 552b(e) and 9.107(a)
of the Commission’s rules that both
items in the above referenced
Affirmation Session be held with less
than one week notice to the public. The
meeting is scheduled on December 23,
2015.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76687; File No. SR–Phlx–
2015–85]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Delete
Sections (e) Through (h) of Exchange
Rule 1020, Registration and Functions
of Options Specialists
December 18, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
16, 2015, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated this proposal
as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder,4 which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
80404
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete
sections (e) through (h) of Exchange
Rule 1020, Registration and Functions
of Options Specialists, as well as the
associated ‘‘Guidelines for Exemptive
Relief Under Rule 1020 for Approved
Persons or Member Organizations
Associated with a Specialist Member
Organization’’ and Rule 1023,
Specialist’s Transactions with Listed
Company.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwall
street.com/, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a
principles-based approach to prohibit
the misuse of material non-public
information by specialists by deleting
Sections (e) through (h) of Exchange
Rule 1020, Registration and Functions
of Options Specialists, as well as the
associated ‘‘Guidelines for Exemptive
Relief Under Rule 1020 for Approved
Persons or Member Organizations
Associated with a Specialist Member
Organization,’’ and Rule 1023,
Specialist’s Transactions with Listed
Company (collectively, the ‘‘Specialist
Restrictions’’). In doing so, the Exchange
would harmonize its rules governing
Phlx members 5 and member
5 Phlx Rule 1(n) defines ‘‘Member’’ as a permit
holder which has not been terminated in
accordance with the By-Laws and Rules of the
Exchange.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
organizations 6 generally, and Phlx
specialists in particular, relating to
protecting against the misuse of
material, non-public information. The
Exchange believes that the Specialist
Restrictions are no longer necessary
because all specialists are subject to the
Exchange’s general principles-based
requirements governing the protection
against the misuse of material, nonpublic information, pursuant to Phlx
Rule 761, Supervisory Procedures
Relating to ITSFEA and to Prevention of
Misuse of Material Nonpublic
Information, which obviates the need
for separately-prescribed requirements
for a subset of market participants on
the Exchange. Additionally, there is no
separate regulatory purpose served by
having separate rules for specialists. The
Exchange notes that this proposed rule
change will not decrease the protections
against the misuse of material, nonpublic information; instead, it is
designed to provide more flexibility to
market participants. This is a
competitive filing that is based on a
proposal recently submitted by NYSE
MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’) and approved
by the Commission.7
A ‘‘specialist’’ is an Exchange member
who is registered as an options
specialist pursuant to Exchange Rule
1020(a). Specialists are subject to
quoting and registration obligations set
forth in Rules 1014(b), 1020 and
1080.02. Quoting obligations of other
market makers known as Registered
Options Traders (‘‘ROTs’’) are also set
forth in Rule 1014.8 That rule sets forth
6 Phlx Rule 1(o) defines ‘‘Member Organization’’
as a corporation, partnership (general or limited),
limited liability partnership, limited liability
company, business trust or similar organization,
transacting business as a broker or a dealer in
securities and which has the status of a member
organization by virtue of (i) admission to
membership given to it by the Membership
Department pursuant to the provisions of Rules
900.1 or 900.2 or the By-Laws or (ii) the transitional
rules adopted by the Exchange pursuant to Section
6–4 of the By-Laws.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432
(July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order
Approving SR–NYSEMKT–2015–23). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75792 (August
31, 2015), 80 FR 53606 (September 4, 2015) (SR–
ISE–2015–26).
8 A Registered Option Trader (‘‘ROT’’) is defined
in Exchange Rule 1014(b) as a regular member of
the Exchange located on the trading floor who has
received permission from the Exchange to trade in
options for his own account. ROTs include
Streaming Quote Traders (‘‘SQTs’’) and Remote
Streaming Quote Traders (‘‘RSQTs’’), as well as on
and off-floor ROTS. An SQT is defined in Exchange
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A) as an ROT who has received
permission from the Exchange to generate and
submit option quotations electronically in options
to which such SQT is assigned. An RSQT is defined
in Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B) as an ROT that is
a member affiliated with an Remote Streaming
Quote Trader Organization (‘‘RSQTO’’) with no
physical trading floor presence who has received
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the main difference between specialists
and ROTs, namely that specialists have
a heightened quoting obligation as
compared to ROTs. In addition to a
heightened quoting obligation pursuant
to Rule 1014, specialists are eligible to
receive a greater allocation of
participation rights under certain
circumstances.
Importantly, all ROTs and specialists
have access to the same information in
the Exchange’s order book. Moreover,
neither ROTs nor specialists have
agency obligations on the Exchange’s
order book. As such, the distinctions
between specialists and ROTs are their
quoting requirements set forth in Rule
1014.
Notwithstanding that specialists have
access to the same Exchange trading
information as all other market
participants on the Exchange, the
Exchange has specific rules governing
how specialists may operate. Currently,
Phlx Rule 1023 restricts specialists and
various affiliates from effecting certain
transactions with a company in options
of which the specialist is registered.9
Rule 1020(e) limits the ability of
specialists’ affiliates to purchase or sell
options in which the specialist is
registered for any account in which the
affiliate is interested.10 Rule 1020(f)
permission from the Exchange to generate and
submit option quotations electronically in options
to which such RSQT has been assigned. An RSQTO,
which may also be referred to as a Remote Market
Making Organization (‘‘RMO’’), is a member
organization in good standing that satisfies the
RSQTO readiness requirements in Rule 507(a).
9 Specifically, Rule 1023 provides that no
specialist or his member organization, or any
member, limited partner, officer, employee,
approved person or party approved shall directly or
indirectly, effect any business transaction with a
company or any officer, director or 10%
stockholder of a company in which options of such
company the specialist is registered, except for
business transactions in goods and services on
terms generally available to the public. It further
provides that no specialist, his member
organization or corporate subsidiary of such
organization shall accept an order for the purchase
or sale of any option in which he is registered as
a specialist directly (i) from the company issuing
such stock or (ii) from any officer, director or 10%
stockholder of that company.
10 Specifically, Rule 1020(e) provides that no
member (other than a specialist acting pursuant to
paragraphs 1020(c) or (d)), limited partner, officer,
employee, approved person or party approved, who
is affiliated with a specialist or specialist member
organization, shall, during the period of such
affiliation, purchase or sell any option in which
such specialist is registered for any account in
which such person or party has a direct or indirect
interest. Any such person or party may, however,
reduce or liquidate an existing position in an option
in which such specialist is registered provided that
such orders are (i) identified as being for an account
in which such person or party has a direct or
indirect interest; (ii) approved for execution for an
Options Exchange Official; and (iii) executed by the
specialist in a manner reasonably calculated to
contribute to the maintenance of price continuity
with reasonable depth. No order entered pursuant
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
provides an exemption from the
restrictions imposed by Rules 1023 and
1020(e), but only if the Exchange has
approved procedures restricting the
flow of material non-public corporate or
market information between the
specialist’s affiliate and the specialist
member organization and any member,
officer or employee associated
therewith. The procedures are required
to comply with the ‘‘Guidelines for
Exemptive Relief under Rule 1020 for
Approved Persons or Member
Organizations Affiliated with a
Specialist Member Organization’’ (the
‘‘Guidelines’’), which are referred to in,
and set forth following, Rule 1020(f).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange believes that the
Specialist Restrictions, including the
Guidelines and the Exchange approval
requirement, are no longer necessary
and proposes to delete them. The
Exchange believes that Rule 761,
Supervisory Procedures Relating to
ITSFEA and to Prevention of the Misuse
of Material Nonpublic Information,
Commentary .02 governing the misuse
of material, non-public information,
provides for an appropriate, principlesbased approach to prevent the market
abuses the Specialist Restrictions are
designed to address. Specifically, Rule
761, Commentary .02 requires every
member or member organization to
establish, maintain and enforce written
policies and procedures reasonably
designed, taking into consideration the
nature of the member’s business, to
prevent the misuse of material nonpublic information by such member or
persons associated with such member in
violation of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the rules thereunder and
the Exchange’s own rules. For purposes
of Rule 761, Commentary .02, misuse of
material non-public information means:
(a) Trading in any securities issued by a
corporation, partnership, Portfolio
Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares,
trust issued receipts, currency trust shares or
a trust or similar entities, or in any related
securities or related options or other
derivative securities, or in any related
commodity, related commodity futures or
options on commodity futures or any other
related commodity derivatives, while in
possession of material nonpublic information
concerning that corporation, Portfolio
Depository Receipt, Index Fund Share, trust
issued receipts, currency trust shares, trust or
similar entity;
(b) trading in an underlying security or
related options or other derivative securities,
or in any related commodity, related
commodity futures or options on commodity
to Rule 1020(e) shall be given priority over, or
parity with, any order represented in the market at
the same price.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
futures or any other related commodity
derivatives, while in possession of material
nonpublic information concerning imminent
transactions in the above; and
(c) disclosing to another person any
material nonpublic information involving a
corporation, partnership, Portfolio
Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares,
trust issued receipts, currency trust shares or
a trust or similar entities whose shares are
publicly traded or an imminent transaction
in an underlying security or in any related
commodity, related commodity futures or
options on commodity futures or any other
related commodity derivatives, for the
purpose of facilitating the possible misuse of
such material nonpublic information.
Because members and member
organizations are already subject to the
requirements of Rule 761, Commentary
.02, the Exchange does not believe it
necessary to separately require specific
limitations on specialists. Deleting the
Specialist Restrictions including the
Guidelines and its requirements for
specific procedures would provide
specialists flexibility to adapt their
policies and procedures as appropriate
to reflect changes to their business
model, business activities, or the
securities market in a manner similar to
how members and member
organizations on the Exchange currently
operate and consistent with Exchange
Rule 761, Commentary .02.
As noted above, specialists are
distinguished under Exchange rules
from ROTs in that specialists have
heightened quoting obligations and
differing participation entitlements.
However, none of these heightened
obligations or different entitlements
provides different or greater access to
non-public information than any other
member or member organization on the
Exchange. Accordingly, because
specialists do not have any trading
advantages at the Exchange due to their
market role, the Exchange believes they
should be subject to the same rules as
other members and member
organizations regarding the protection
against the misuse of material nonpublic information, which in this case is
existing Exchange Rule 761,
Commentary .02.11
The Exchange is not proposing to
change what is considered to be
material, non-public information that an
11 The Exchange notes that by deleting the
Specialist Restrictions, the Exchange would no
longer require specific information barriers for
specialists or require pre-approval of any
information barriers that a specialist would erect for
purposes of protecting against the misuse of
material non-public information. However, the
policies and procedures of specialists, including
those relating to information barriers, would be
subject to review by FINRA, on behalf of the
Exchange, pursuant to a Regulatory Services
Agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80405
affiliated brokerage business of a
specialist could share with such
specialist. In that regard, the proposed
rule change will not permit affiliates of
a specialist to have access to any nonpublic order or quote information of the
specialist, including hidden or
undisplayed size or price information of
such orders or quotes. Affiliates of
specialists would only have access to
orders and quotes that are publicly
available to all market participants.
Members do not expect to receive any
additional order or quote information as
a result of this proposed rule change.
The Exchange does not believe that
there will be any material change to
member information barriers as a result
of the removal of the Exchange preapproval requirement. The Exchange
has rules prohibiting members from
disadvantaging their customers or other
market participants by improperly
capitalizing on the member’s access to
or receipt of material, non-public
information.12
Further, the Exchange does not
believe there will be any material
change to specialist information barriers
as a result of removal of the Exchange’s
pre-approval requirements. In fact, the
Exchange anticipates that eliminating
the pre-approval requirement should
facilitate implementation of changes to
specialist information barriers as
necessary to protect against the misuse
of material, non-public information. The
Exchange also suggests that the preapproval requirement is unnecessary
because specialists do not have agency
responsibilities to orders in the book, or
time and place information advantages
because of their market role.
12 For example, Rule 748 requires each member
or member organization to establish, maintain, and
enforce written supervisory procedures, and a
system for applying such procedures, to supervise
the types of business(es) in which the member or
member organization engages in and to supervise
the activities of all registered representatives,
employees, and associated persons. The written
supervisory procedures and the system for applying
such procedures must reasonably be expected to
prevent and detect, insofar as practicable, violations
of the applicable securities laws and regulations,
including the By-Laws and Rules of the Exchange.,
[sic] Additionally, Rule 1064 provides that no
member organization or person associated with a
member or member organization who has
knowledge of the material terms and conditions of
a solicited order, an order being facilitated, or
orders being crossed, the execution of which are
imminent, shall enter, based on such knowledge, an
order to buy or sell an option for the same
underlying security; an order to buy or sell the
security underlying such class; or an order to buy
or sell any related instrument until (i) the terms and
conditions of the order and any changes in the
terms of the order of which the member, member
organization or person associated with a member or
member organization has knowledge are disclosed
to the trading crowd, or (ii) the trade can no longer
reasonably be considered imminent in view of the
passage of time since the order was received.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
80406
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange notes that its proposed
principles-based approach to protecting
against the misuse of material nonpublic information for all its members
and member organizations is consistent
with recently filed and approved rule
changes for NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’), BATS
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS’’), and New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’)
governing cash equity market makers on
those respective exchanges.13 Except for
prescribed rules relating to floor-based
designated market makers on the NYSE,
who have access to specified non-public
trading information, each of these
exchanges have moved to a principlesbased approach to protecting against the
misuse of material non-public
information. In connection with
approving those rule changes, the
Commission found that, with adequate
oversight by the exchanges of their
members, eliminating prescriptive
information barrier requirements should
not reduce the effectiveness of exchange
rules requiring members to establish
and maintain systems to supervise the
activities of members, including written
procedures reasonably designed to
ensure compliance with applicable
federal securities law and regulations,
and with the rules of the applicable
exchange.
The Exchange believes that a
principles-based rule applicable to
members of options markets would be
equally effective in protecting against
the misuse of material non-public
information.14 Indeed, Exchange Rule
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432
(July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order
Approving Adopting a Principles-Based Approach
to Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic
Information by Specialists and e-Specialists by
Deleting Rule 927.3NY and Section (f) of Rule
927.5NY). See also Securities Exchange Act Release
Nos. 60604 (Sept. 2, 2009), 76 FR 46272 (Sept. 8,
2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–78) (Order approving
elimination of NYSE Arca rule that required market
makers to establish and maintain specifically
prescribed information barriers, including
discussion of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq rules) (‘‘Arca
Approval Order’’); 61574 (Feb. 23, 2010), 75 FR
9455 (Mar. 2, 2010) (SR–BATS–2010–003) (Order
approving amendments to BATS Rule 5.5 to move
to a principles-based approach to protecting against
the misuse of material, nonpublic information, and
noting that the proposed change is consistent with
the approaches of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq) (‘‘BATS
Approval Order’’); and 72534 (July 3, 2014), 79 FR
39440 (July 10, 2014), [sic] SR–NYSE–2014–12)
(Order approving amendments to NYSE Rule 98
governing designated market makers to move to a
principles-based approach to prohibit the misuse of
material non-public information) (‘‘NYSE Approval
Order’’).
14 International Securities Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ISE’’)
and BOX Options Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’) have
recently taken a similar approach. See Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Adopting a Principles-Based Approach
to Prohibit the Misuse of Material, Non-public
Information by Market Makers by Deleting Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
761, Commentary .02 is currently
applicable to specialists and already
requires policies and procedures
reasonably designed to protect against
the misuse of material non-public
information, which is similar to the
respective NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca
Equities, BATS and NYSE rules
governing cash equity market makers.
The Exchange believes Exchange Rule
761, Commentary .02 provides
appropriate protection against the
misuse of material non-public
information by specialists such that
there is no further need for prescriptive
information barrier requirements as set
forth in the Specialist Restrictions.
The Exchange notes that even with
this proposed rule change, pursuant to
Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02 a
specialist would still be obligated to
ensure that its policies and procedures
reflect the current state of its business
and continue to be reasonably designed
to achieve compliance with applicable
federal securities law and regulations,
including Section 15(g) of the Act,15 and
with applicable Exchange rules,
including being reasonably designed to
protect against the misuse of material,
non-public information. While
information barriers would not
specifically be required under the
proposal, Rule 761, Commentary .02
already requires that a member or
member organization consider its
business model or business activities in
structuring its policies and procedures,
which may dictate that an information
barrier or a functional separation be part
of the appropriate set of policies and
procedures that would be reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities law and
regulations, and with applicable
Exchange rules.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed reliance on principles-based
Rule 761, Commentary .02 would
ensure that a specialist would be
required to protect against the misuse of
any material non-public information. As
noted above, Rule 761, Commentary .02
already requires that firms refrain from
trading while in possession of material
non-public information concerning
imminent transactions in the security or
related product. The Exchange believes
that moving to a principles-based
810, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75792
(August 31, 2015), 80 FR 53606 (September 4, 2015)
(SR–ISE–2015–26). See also Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Adopt a Principles-based Approach to Prohibit
the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information by
Market Makers, Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 75916 (September 14, 2015), 80 FR 56503
(September 18, 2015) (SR–BOX–2015–31).
15 15 U.S.C. 78o(g).
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approach rather than prescribing how
and when to wall off a specialist from
the rest of the firm would provide
specialists with flexibility when
managing risk across a firm, including
integrating options positions with other
positions of the firm or, as applicable,
by the respective independent trading
unit.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 16 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 17
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market by adopting a
principles based approach to permit a
member or member organization to
maintain and enforce policies and
procedures to, among other things,
prohibit the misuse of material nonpublic information and provide
flexibility on how a specialist structures
its operations.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
rule change is based on an approved
rule of the Exchange to which members
and member organizations are subject—
Rule 761, Commentary .02—and
harmonizes the rules governing
members and member organizations.
Moreover, specialists would continue to
be subject to federal and Exchange
requirements for protecting material
non-public order information.18 The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market because it would
harmonize the Exchange’s approach to
protecting against the misuse of material
non-public information and no longer
subject specialists to prescriptive
requirements. The Exchange does not
believe that the existing prescriptive
requirements applicable to specialists
are narrowly tailored to their roles
because specialists do not have access to
Exchange trading information in a
manner different from any other market
participant on the Exchange.
The Exchange further believes the
proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
16 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 See 15 U.S.C. 78o(g) and Exchange Rule 761,
Commentary .02.
17 15
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
practices and to promote just and
equitable principles of trade because
existing rules make clear to members
and member organizations the type of
conduct that is prohibited by the
Exchange. While the proposal
eliminates prescriptive requirements
relating to the misuse of material nonpublic information, specialists would
remain subject to existing Exchange
rules requiring them to establish and
maintain systems to supervise their
activities, and to create, implement, and
maintain written procedures that are
reasonably designed to comply with
applicable securities laws and Exchange
rules, including the prohibition on the
misuse of material, non-public
information. Additionally, the policies
and procedures of specialists, including
those relating to information barriers,
would be subject to review by FINRA,
on behalf of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
rule change would still require that
specialists maintain and enforce
policies and procedures reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with
applicable federal securities laws and
regulations and with Exchange rules.
Even though there would no longer be
pre-approval of specialist information
barriers, any specialist written policies
and procedures would continue to be
subject to oversight by the Exchange and
therefore the elimination of prescribed
restrictions should not reduce the
effectiveness of the Exchange rules to
protect against the misuse of material
non-public information. Rather,
members and member organizations
will be able to utilize a flexible,
principles-based approach to modify
their policies and procedures as
appropriate to reflect changes to their
business model, business activities, or
to the securities market itself. Moreover,
while specified information barriers
may no longer be required, a member or
member organization’s business model
or business activities may dictate that an
information barrier or functional
separation be part of the appropriate set
of policies and procedures that would
be reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations, and with
applicable Exchange rules. The
Exchange therefore believes that the
proposed rule change will maintain the
existing protection of investors and the
public interest that is currently
applicable to specialists, while at the
same time removing impediments to
and perfecting a free and open market
by moving to a principles-based
approach to protect against the misuse
of material non-public information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. As indicated
above, the rule change is being proposed
as a competitive response to a filing
submitted by NYSE MKT that was
recently approved by the Commission.
The Exchange believes that the proposal
will enhance competition by allowing
specialists to comply with applicable
Exchange rules in a manner best suited
to their business models, business
activities, and the securities markets,
thus reducing regulatory burdens while
still ensuring compliance with
applicable securities laws and
regulations and Exchange rules. The
Exchange believes that the proposal will
foster a fair and orderly marketplace
without being overly burdensome upon
specialists.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would
eliminate a burden on competition for
members and member organizations
which currently exists as a result of
disparate rule treatment between
options and equities markets regarding
how to protect against the misuse of
material non-public information. For
those members and member
organizations that are also members of
equity exchanges, their respective
equity market maker operations are now
subject to a principles-based approach
to protecting against the misuse of
material non-public information. The
Exchange believes it would remove a
burden on competition to enable
members and member organizations to
similarly apply a principles-based
approach to protecting against the
misuse of material non-public
information in the options space as ISE
has recently done. To this end, the
Exchange notes that Exchange Rule 761,
Commentary .02 still requires a
specialist to evaluate its business to
assure that its policies and procedures
are reasonably designed to protect
against the misuse of material nonpublic information. However, with this
proposed rule change, a member or
member organization that trades
equities and options could look at its
firm more holistically to structure its
operations in a manner that provides it
with better tools to manage its risks
across multiple security classes, while
at the same time protecting against the
misuse of material non-public
information.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80407
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 19 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.20
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
PHLX–2015–85 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PHLX–2015–85. This file
19 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
20 17
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
80408
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PHLX–2015–85 and should
be submitted on or before January 14,
2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–32383 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76693; File No. SR–BX–
2015–079]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Establish
Fees and Rebates Related to BX Price
Improvement Auction (PRISM)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
December 18, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
11, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Options Pricing at Chapter XV, Section
2, entitled ‘‘BX Options Market—Fees
and Rebates,’’ which governs pricing for
BX members using the BX Options
Market (‘‘BX Options’’). The Exchange
proposes to adopt new subsection (5) to
add fees and rebates for BX Price
Improvement Auction (‘‘PRISM’’),
which is a mechanism for price
improvement on BX Options (‘‘Price
Improvement Mechanism’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwall
street.com/, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Chapter XV, Section 2 to adopt new
subsection (5) to add fees and rebates for
PRISM.
Effective on or about November 16,
2015, BX Options is introducing PRISM,
which is codified in BX Chapter VI,
Section 9 (also known as the ‘‘PRISM
Rule’’).3 PRISM is a Price Improvement
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76301
(October 29, 2015), 80 FR 68347 (November 4, 2015)
(SR–BX–2015–032) (approval order) (‘‘PRISM
Approval’’); and 75827 (September 3, 2015), 80 FR
54601 (September 10, 2015) (SR–BX–2015–032)
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Mechanism for all-electronic BX
Options whereby a buy and sell order
may be submitted in one order message
to initiate an auction at a ‘stop price’
and seek potential price improvement.
Options are traded electronically on BX
Options, and all options participants
may respond to a PRISM Auction,4 the
duration of which will be set at 200
milliseconds.5 PRISM includes automatch functionality in which a
Participant (an ‘‘Initiating Participant’’)
may electronically submit for execution
an order it represents as agent on behalf
of customer,6 broker dealer, or any other
entity (‘‘PRISM Order’’) against
principal interest or against any other
order it represents as agent (an
‘‘Initiating Order’’) provided it submits
the PRISM Order for electronic
execution into the PRISM Auction
pursuant to Chapter VI, Section 9.7 The
PRISM Rule describes the circumstances
under which an Initiating Participant
may initiate an Auction. A PRISM Order
that is for a Non-Customer (account of
a broker-dealer or any other person or
entity that is not a Public Customer) is
always required to improve the same
side of the BX BBO even if there is no
resting limit order on the book. PRISM
Orders that do not comply with the
requirements set forth in the PRISM
Rule are not eligible to initiate an
Auction and will be immediately
cancelled. Also, PRISM Orders
submitted at or before the opening of
trading are not eligible to initiate an
Auction and will be rejected. PRISM
Orders submitted during the final two
seconds of the trading session in the
(‘‘PRISM Filing’’). In the PRISM Approval the
Exchange noted that it will file a rule change
separately with the Commission to remove Price
Improving and Post-Only Order types from its
Rules. The Exchange will not commence offering
BX PRISM until such time as it has an effective and
operative rule in place from the Commission to
remove Price Improving and Post-Only Orders and
removes the ability to submit Price Improving and
Post-Only Orders into the auction. In the event the
Exchange determines to amend its order types to
allow the entry of non-displayed order types, e.g.
Price Improving or Post-Only Orders, the Exchange
will file a proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) with the Commission to seek approval for
such rule change. See also Options Technical
Update #2015–6.
4 PRISM Auction eligibility requirements and the
early conclusion of the PRISM Auction are, with
certain other PRISM features, subject to a pilot
program scheduled to expire July 18, 2016. See BX
Chapter VI, Section 9.
5 Other exchanges that have price improvement
auctions have developed different durations. See,
e.g., CBOE Rule 6.74A(b)(1)(C) (CBOE’s AIM
auction has a duration of one second); and BOX
Rule 7150(f)(1) (BOX’s PIP auction has a duration
of one hundred milliseconds, commencing on the
dissemination of the PIP broadcast).
6 The term ‘‘Customer’’ is defined below for
purposes of this fee proposal.
7 BX PRISM will only conduct an auction for
simple (non-complex) Orders.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80403-80408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76687; File No. SR-Phlx-2015-85]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Delete
Sections (e) Through (h) of Exchange Rule 1020, Registration and
Functions of Options Specialists
December 18, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 16, 2015, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
[[Page 80404]]
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete sections (e) through (h) of
Exchange Rule 1020, Registration and Functions of Options Specialists,
as well as the associated ``Guidelines for Exemptive Relief Under Rule
1020 for Approved Persons or Member Organizations Associated with a
Specialist Member Organization'' and Rule 1023, Specialist's
Transactions with Listed Company.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a principles-based approach to
prohibit the misuse of material non-public information by specialists
by deleting Sections (e) through (h) of Exchange Rule 1020,
Registration and Functions of Options Specialists, as well as the
associated ``Guidelines for Exemptive Relief Under Rule 1020 for
Approved Persons or Member Organizations Associated with a Specialist
Member Organization,'' and Rule 1023, Specialist's Transactions with
Listed Company (collectively, the ``Specialist Restrictions''). In
doing so, the Exchange would harmonize its rules governing Phlx members
\5\ and member organizations \6\ generally, and Phlx specialists in
particular, relating to protecting against the misuse of material, non-
public information. The Exchange believes that the Specialist
Restrictions are no longer necessary because all specialists are
subject to the Exchange's general principles-based requirements
governing the protection against the misuse of material, non-public
information, pursuant to Phlx Rule 761, Supervisory Procedures Relating
to ITSFEA and to Prevention of Misuse of Material Nonpublic
Information, which obviates the need for separately-prescribed
requirements for a subset of market participants on the Exchange.
Additionally, there is no separate regulatory purpose served by having
separate rules for specialists. The Exchange notes that this proposed
rule change will not decrease the protections against the misuse of
material, non-public information; instead, it is designed to provide
more flexibility to market participants. This is a competitive filing
that is based on a proposal recently submitted by NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE
MKT'') and approved by the Commission.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Phlx Rule 1(n) defines ``Member'' as a permit holder which
has not been terminated in accordance with the By-Laws and Rules of
the Exchange.
\6\ Phlx Rule 1(o) defines ``Member Organization'' as a
corporation, partnership (general or limited), limited liability
partnership, limited liability company, business trust or similar
organization, transacting business as a broker or a dealer in
securities and which has the status of a member organization by
virtue of (i) admission to membership given to it by the Membership
Department pursuant to the provisions of Rules 900.1 or 900.2 or the
By-Laws or (ii) the transitional rules adopted by the Exchange
pursuant to Section 6-4 of the By-Laws.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432 (July 13,
2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order Approving SR-NYSEMKT-2015-
23). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75792 (August 31,
2015), 80 FR 53606 (September 4, 2015) (SR-ISE-2015-26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A ``specialist'' is an Exchange member who is registered as an
options specialist pursuant to Exchange Rule 1020(a). Specialists are
subject to quoting and registration obligations set forth in Rules
1014(b), 1020 and 1080.02. Quoting obligations of other market makers
known as Registered Options Traders (``ROTs'') are also set forth in
Rule 1014.\8\ That rule sets forth the main difference between
specialists and ROTs, namely that specialists have a heightened quoting
obligation as compared to ROTs. In addition to a heightened quoting
obligation pursuant to Rule 1014, specialists are eligible to receive a
greater allocation of participation rights under certain circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ A Registered Option Trader (``ROT'') is defined in Exchange
Rule 1014(b) as a regular member of the Exchange located on the
trading floor who has received permission from the Exchange to trade
in options for his own account. ROTs include Streaming Quote Traders
(``SQTs'') and Remote Streaming Quote Traders (``RSQTs''), as well
as on and off-floor ROTS. An SQT is defined in Exchange Rule
1014(b)(ii)(A) as an ROT who has received permission from the
Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically in
options to which such SQT is assigned. An RSQT is defined in
Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B) as an ROT that is a member affiliated
with an Remote Streaming Quote Trader Organization (``RSQTO'') with
no physical trading floor presence who has received permission from
the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically
in options to which such RSQT has been assigned. An RSQTO, which may
also be referred to as a Remote Market Making Organization
(``RMO''), is a member organization in good standing that satisfies
the RSQTO readiness requirements in Rule 507(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, all ROTs and specialists have access to the same
information in the Exchange's order book. Moreover, neither ROTs nor
specialists have agency obligations on the Exchange's order book. As
such, the distinctions between specialists and ROTs are their quoting
requirements set forth in Rule 1014.
Notwithstanding that specialists have access to the same Exchange
trading information as all other market participants on the Exchange,
the Exchange has specific rules governing how specialists may operate.
Currently, Phlx Rule 1023 restricts specialists and various affiliates
from effecting certain transactions with a company in options of which
the specialist is registered.\9\ Rule 1020(e) limits the ability of
specialists' affiliates to purchase or sell options in which the
specialist is registered for any account in which the affiliate is
interested.\10\ Rule 1020(f)
[[Page 80405]]
provides an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Rules 1023 and
1020(e), but only if the Exchange has approved procedures restricting
the flow of material non-public corporate or market information between
the specialist's affiliate and the specialist member organization and
any member, officer or employee associated therewith. The procedures
are required to comply with the ``Guidelines for Exemptive Relief under
Rule 1020 for Approved Persons or Member Organizations Affiliated with
a Specialist Member Organization'' (the ``Guidelines''), which are
referred to in, and set forth following, Rule 1020(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Specifically, Rule 1023 provides that no specialist or his
member organization, or any member, limited partner, officer,
employee, approved person or party approved shall directly or
indirectly, effect any business transaction with a company or any
officer, director or 10% stockholder of a company in which options
of such company the specialist is registered, except for business
transactions in goods and services on terms generally available to
the public. It further provides that no specialist, his member
organization or corporate subsidiary of such organization shall
accept an order for the purchase or sale of any option in which he
is registered as a specialist directly (i) from the company issuing
such stock or (ii) from any officer, director or 10% stockholder of
that company.
\10\ Specifically, Rule 1020(e) provides that no member (other
than a specialist acting pursuant to paragraphs 1020(c) or (d)),
limited partner, officer, employee, approved person or party
approved, who is affiliated with a specialist or specialist member
organization, shall, during the period of such affiliation, purchase
or sell any option in which such specialist is registered for any
account in which such person or party has a direct or indirect
interest. Any such person or party may, however, reduce or liquidate
an existing position in an option in which such specialist is
registered provided that such orders are (i) identified as being for
an account in which such person or party has a direct or indirect
interest; (ii) approved for execution for an Options Exchange
Official; and (iii) executed by the specialist in a manner
reasonably calculated to contribute to the maintenance of price
continuity with reasonable depth. No order entered pursuant to Rule
1020(e) shall be given priority over, or parity with, any order
represented in the market at the same price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange believes that the Specialist Restrictions, including
the Guidelines and the Exchange approval requirement, are no longer
necessary and proposes to delete them. The Exchange believes that Rule
761, Supervisory Procedures Relating to ITSFEA and to Prevention of the
Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information, Commentary .02 governing the
misuse of material, non-public information, provides for an
appropriate, principles-based approach to prevent the market abuses the
Specialist Restrictions are designed to address. Specifically, Rule
761, Commentary .02 requires every member or member organization to
establish, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed, taking into consideration the nature of the
member's business, to prevent the misuse of material non-public
information by such member or persons associated with such member in
violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules
thereunder and the Exchange's own rules. For purposes of Rule 761,
Commentary .02, misuse of material non-public information means:
(a) Trading in any securities issued by a corporation,
partnership, Portfolio Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares, trust
issued receipts, currency trust shares or a trust or similar
entities, or in any related securities or related options or other
derivative securities, or in any related commodity, related
commodity futures or options on commodity futures or any other
related commodity derivatives, while in possession of material
nonpublic information concerning that corporation, Portfolio
Depository Receipt, Index Fund Share, trust issued receipts,
currency trust shares, trust or similar entity;
(b) trading in an underlying security or related options or
other derivative securities, or in any related commodity, related
commodity futures or options on commodity futures or any other
related commodity derivatives, while in possession of material
nonpublic information concerning imminent transactions in the above;
and
(c) disclosing to another person any material nonpublic
information involving a corporation, partnership, Portfolio
Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares, trust issued receipts,
currency trust shares or a trust or similar entities whose shares
are publicly traded or an imminent transaction in an underlying
security or in any related commodity, related commodity futures or
options on commodity futures or any other related commodity
derivatives, for the purpose of facilitating the possible misuse of
such material nonpublic information.
Because members and member organizations are already subject to the
requirements of Rule 761, Commentary .02, the Exchange does not believe
it necessary to separately require specific limitations on specialists.
Deleting the Specialist Restrictions including the Guidelines and its
requirements for specific procedures would provide specialists
flexibility to adapt their policies and procedures as appropriate to
reflect changes to their business model, business activities, or the
securities market in a manner similar to how members and member
organizations on the Exchange currently operate and consistent with
Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02.
As noted above, specialists are distinguished under Exchange rules
from ROTs in that specialists have heightened quoting obligations and
differing participation entitlements. However, none of these heightened
obligations or different entitlements provides different or greater
access to non-public information than any other member or member
organization on the Exchange. Accordingly, because specialists do not
have any trading advantages at the Exchange due to their market role,
the Exchange believes they should be subject to the same rules as other
members and member organizations regarding the protection against the
misuse of material non-public information, which in this case is
existing Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The Exchange notes that by deleting the Specialist
Restrictions, the Exchange would no longer require specific
information barriers for specialists or require pre-approval of any
information barriers that a specialist would erect for purposes of
protecting against the misuse of material non-public information.
However, the policies and procedures of specialists, including those
relating to information barriers, would be subject to review by
FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, pursuant to a Regulatory Services
Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is not proposing to change what is considered to be
material, non-public information that an affiliated brokerage business
of a specialist could share with such specialist. In that regard, the
proposed rule change will not permit affiliates of a specialist to have
access to any non-public order or quote information of the specialist,
including hidden or undisplayed size or price information of such
orders or quotes. Affiliates of specialists would only have access to
orders and quotes that are publicly available to all market
participants. Members do not expect to receive any additional order or
quote information as a result of this proposed rule change. The
Exchange does not believe that there will be any material change to
member information barriers as a result of the removal of the Exchange
pre-approval requirement. The Exchange has rules prohibiting members
from disadvantaging their customers or other market participants by
improperly capitalizing on the member's access to or receipt of
material, non-public information.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For example, Rule 748 requires each member or member
organization to establish, maintain, and enforce written supervisory
procedures, and a system for applying such procedures, to supervise
the types of business(es) in which the member or member organization
engages in and to supervise the activities of all registered
representatives, employees, and associated persons. The written
supervisory procedures and the system for applying such procedures
must reasonably be expected to prevent and detect, insofar as
practicable, violations of the applicable securities laws and
regulations, including the By-Laws and Rules of the Exchange., [sic]
Additionally, Rule 1064 provides that no member organization or
person associated with a member or member organization who has
knowledge of the material terms and conditions of a solicited order,
an order being facilitated, or orders being crossed, the execution
of which are imminent, shall enter, based on such knowledge, an
order to buy or sell an option for the same underlying security; an
order to buy or sell the security underlying such class; or an order
to buy or sell any related instrument until (i) the terms and
conditions of the order and any changes in the terms of the order of
which the member, member organization or person associated with a
member or member organization has knowledge are disclosed to the
trading crowd, or (ii) the trade can no longer reasonably be
considered imminent in view of the passage of time since the order
was received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange does not believe there will be any material
change to specialist information barriers as a result of removal of the
Exchange's pre-approval requirements. In fact, the Exchange anticipates
that eliminating the pre-approval requirement should facilitate
implementation of changes to specialist information barriers as
necessary to protect against the misuse of material, non-public
information. The Exchange also suggests that the pre-approval
requirement is unnecessary because specialists do not have agency
responsibilities to orders in the book, or time and place information
advantages because of their market role.
[[Page 80406]]
The Exchange notes that its proposed principles-based approach to
protecting against the misuse of material non-public information for
all its members and member organizations is consistent with recently
filed and approved rule changes for NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
(``NYSE Arca''), BATS Exchange, Inc. (``BATS''), and New York Stock
Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') governing cash equity market makers on those
respective exchanges.\13\ Except for prescribed rules relating to
floor-based designated market makers on the NYSE, who have access to
specified non-public trading information, each of these exchanges have
moved to a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse
of material non-public information. In connection with approving those
rule changes, the Commission found that, with adequate oversight by the
exchanges of their members, eliminating prescriptive information
barrier requirements should not reduce the effectiveness of exchange
rules requiring members to establish and maintain systems to supervise
the activities of members, including written procedures reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with applicable federal securities law
and regulations, and with the rules of the applicable exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432 (July 13,
2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order Approving Adopting a
Principles-Based Approach to Prohibit the Misuse of Material
Nonpublic Information by Specialists and e-Specialists by Deleting
Rule 927.3NY and Section (f) of Rule 927.5NY). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 60604 (Sept. 2, 2009), 76 FR 46272 (Sept.
8, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-78) (Order approving elimination of NYSE
Arca rule that required market makers to establish and maintain
specifically prescribed information barriers, including discussion
of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq rules) (``Arca Approval Order''); 61574
(Feb. 23, 2010), 75 FR 9455 (Mar. 2, 2010) (SR-BATS-2010-003) (Order
approving amendments to BATS Rule 5.5 to move to a principles-based
approach to protecting against the misuse of material, nonpublic
information, and noting that the proposed change is consistent with
the approaches of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq) (``BATS Approval Order'');
and 72534 (July 3, 2014), 79 FR 39440 (July 10, 2014), [sic] SR-
NYSE-2014-12) (Order approving amendments to NYSE Rule 98 governing
designated market makers to move to a principles-based approach to
prohibit the misuse of material non-public information) (``NYSE
Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that a principles-based rule applicable to
members of options markets would be equally effective in protecting
against the misuse of material non-public information.\14\ Indeed,
Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02 is currently applicable to
specialists and already requires policies and procedures reasonably
designed to protect against the misuse of material non-public
information, which is similar to the respective NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca
Equities, BATS and NYSE rules governing cash equity market makers. The
Exchange believes Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02 provides
appropriate protection against the misuse of material non-public
information by specialists such that there is no further need for
prescriptive information barrier requirements as set forth in the
Specialist Restrictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ International Securities Exchange, Inc. (``ISE'') and BOX
Options Exchange LLC (``BOX'') have recently taken a similar
approach. See Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Adopting a Principles-Based Approach to
Prohibit the Misuse of Material, Non-public Information by Market
Makers by Deleting Rule 810, Securities Exchange Act Release No.
75792 (August 31, 2015), 80 FR 53606 (September 4, 2015) (SR-ISE-
2015-26). See also Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change to Adopt a Principles-based Approach to
Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information by Market
Makers, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75916 (September 14,
2015), 80 FR 56503 (September 18, 2015) (SR-BOX-2015-31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that even with this proposed rule change,
pursuant to Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02 a specialist would still
be obligated to ensure that its policies and procedures reflect the
current state of its business and continue to be reasonably designed to
achieve compliance with applicable federal securities law and
regulations, including Section 15(g) of the Act,\15\ and with
applicable Exchange rules, including being reasonably designed to
protect against the misuse of material, non-public information. While
information barriers would not specifically be required under the
proposal, Rule 761, Commentary .02 already requires that a member or
member organization consider its business model or business activities
in structuring its policies and procedures, which may dictate that an
information barrier or a functional separation be part of the
appropriate set of policies and procedures that would be reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities law and
regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed reliance on principles-
based Rule 761, Commentary .02 would ensure that a specialist would be
required to protect against the misuse of any material non-public
information. As noted above, Rule 761, Commentary .02 already requires
that firms refrain from trading while in possession of material non-
public information concerning imminent transactions in the security or
related product. The Exchange believes that moving to a principles-
based approach rather than prescribing how and when to wall off a
specialist from the rest of the firm would provide specialists with
flexibility when managing risk across a firm, including integrating
options positions with other positions of the firm or, as applicable,
by the respective independent trading unit.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \16\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \17\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market by adopting a principles based approach to permit a member or
member organization to maintain and enforce policies and procedures to,
among other things, prohibit the misuse of material non-public
information and provide flexibility on how a specialist structures its
operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change is based on an
approved rule of the Exchange to which members and member organizations
are subject--Rule 761, Commentary .02--and harmonizes the rules
governing members and member organizations. Moreover, specialists would
continue to be subject to federal and Exchange requirements for
protecting material non-public order information.\18\ The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market because it would
harmonize the Exchange's approach to protecting against the misuse of
material non-public information and no longer subject specialists to
prescriptive requirements. The Exchange does not believe that the
existing prescriptive requirements applicable to specialists are
narrowly tailored to their roles because specialists do not have access
to Exchange trading information in a manner different from any other
market participant on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 15 U.S.C. 78o(g) and Exchange Rule 761, Commentary .02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes the proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
[[Page 80407]]
practices and to promote just and equitable principles of trade because
existing rules make clear to members and member organizations the type
of conduct that is prohibited by the Exchange. While the proposal
eliminates prescriptive requirements relating to the misuse of material
non-public information, specialists would remain subject to existing
Exchange rules requiring them to establish and maintain systems to
supervise their activities, and to create, implement, and maintain
written procedures that are reasonably designed to comply with
applicable securities laws and Exchange rules, including the
prohibition on the misuse of material, non-public information.
Additionally, the policies and procedures of specialists, including
those relating to information barriers, would be subject to review by
FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change would still
require that specialists maintain and enforce policies and procedures
reasonably designed to ensure compliance with applicable federal
securities laws and regulations and with Exchange rules. Even though
there would no longer be pre-approval of specialist information
barriers, any specialist written policies and procedures would continue
to be subject to oversight by the Exchange and therefore the
elimination of prescribed restrictions should not reduce the
effectiveness of the Exchange rules to protect against the misuse of
material non-public information. Rather, members and member
organizations will be able to utilize a flexible, principles-based
approach to modify their policies and procedures as appropriate to
reflect changes to their business model, business activities, or to the
securities market itself. Moreover, while specified information
barriers may no longer be required, a member or member organization's
business model or business activities may dictate that an information
barrier or functional separation be part of the appropriate set of
policies and procedures that would be reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with
applicable Exchange rules. The Exchange therefore believes that the
proposed rule change will maintain the existing protection of investors
and the public interest that is currently applicable to specialists,
while at the same time removing impediments to and perfecting a free
and open market by moving to a principles-based approach to protect
against the misuse of material non-public information.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As indicated above, the rule
change is being proposed as a competitive response to a filing
submitted by NYSE MKT that was recently approved by the Commission. The
Exchange believes that the proposal will enhance competition by
allowing specialists to comply with applicable Exchange rules in a
manner best suited to their business models, business activities, and
the securities markets, thus reducing regulatory burdens while still
ensuring compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and
Exchange rules. The Exchange believes that the proposal will foster a
fair and orderly marketplace without being overly burdensome upon
specialists.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would
eliminate a burden on competition for members and member organizations
which currently exists as a result of disparate rule treatment between
options and equities markets regarding how to protect against the
misuse of material non-public information. For those members and member
organizations that are also members of equity exchanges, their
respective equity market maker operations are now subject to a
principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of material
non-public information. The Exchange believes it would remove a burden
on competition to enable members and member organizations to similarly
apply a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of
material non-public information in the options space as ISE has
recently done. To this end, the Exchange notes that Exchange Rule 761,
Commentary .02 still requires a specialist to evaluate its business to
assure that its policies and procedures are reasonably designed to
protect against the misuse of material non-public information. However,
with this proposed rule change, a member or member organization that
trades equities and options could look at its firm more holistically to
structure its operations in a manner that provides it with better tools
to manage its risks across multiple security classes, while at the same
time protecting against the misuse of material non-public information.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \19\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-PHLX-2015-85 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PHLX-2015-85. This file
[[Page 80408]]
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PHLX-2015-85 and
should be submitted on or before January 14, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-32383 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P