Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Maserati North America, Inc., 79995-79996 [2015-32185]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 23, 2015 / Notices
expiration of the comment period, this
notice will take effect automatically and
will be the final Board action.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at
‘‘WWW.STB.DOT.GOV’’.
It is ordered:
1. The proposed transaction is
approved and authorized, subject to the
filing of opposing comments.
2. If opposing comments are timely
filed, the findings made in this notice
will be deemed vacated.
3. This notice will be effective
February 9, 2016, unless opposing
comments are filed by February 8, 2016.
4. A copy of this notice will be served
on: (1) The U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; (2)
the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530;
and (3) the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the General
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Decided: December 17, 2015.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner
Miller.
Tia Delano,
Clearance Clerk.
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2016–1)]
Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor
Surface Transportation Board.
Approval of rail cost adjustment
AGENCY:
factor.
The Board has approved the
first quarter 2016 Rail Cost Adjustment
Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by
the Association of American Railroads.
The first quarter 2016 RCAF
(Unadjusted) is 0.864. The first quarter
2016 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.368. The first
quarter 2016 RCAF–5 is 0.347.
DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245–0333. Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the
hearing impaired: (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional information is contained in
the Board’s decision, which is available
on our Web site, https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Copies of the decision may be
purchased by contacting the Office of
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Dec 22, 2015
Jkt 238001
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner
Miller.
Decided: December 17, 2015.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2015–32307 Filed 12–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Maserati North America, Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Maserati North America, Inc.’s,
(Maserati) petition for an exemption of
the Levante sports utility vehicle (SUV)
line in accordance with 49 CFR part
543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the 49 CFR
part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
Standard).
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2015–32313 Filed 12–22–15; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
Public Assistance, Governmental
Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245–
0238. Assistance for the hearing
impaired is available through FIRS at
(800) 877–8339.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or energy conservation.
The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2017 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, W43–443, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Mazyck’s phone number is
(202) 366–4139. Her fax number is (202)
493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated October 23, 2015,
Maserati requested an exemption from
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard for the
Levante vehicle line beginning with MY
2017. The petition requested an
exemption from parts-marking pursuant
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79995
to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for the
entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, Maserati
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for the Levante vehicle
line. Maserati stated that beginning with
the 2017 model year, its Levante
vehicles will be equipped with a
passive, antitheft device as standard
equipment. Specifically, the device will
consist of a vehicle alarm system (VTA),
a remote keyless entry (RKE) system and
a sentry key immobilizer system (SKIS).
Key components of Maserati’s antitheft
device are a siren and/or horn, hood ajar
switch, security indicator, RFHub/
Keyless Ignition Node (KIN) and Key fob
(FOBIK), Intrusion and Inclination
Sensor, Door Ajar Switches, Intrusion
Module, Central Body Controller, RKE
and the SKIS. Maserati also informed
the agency that an audible and visual
vehicle alarm system (VTA) has been
incorporated into the device to provide
perimeter protection that will monitor
the vehicle’s doors, tailgate, ignition
switch, interior vehicle intrusion and
inclination sensors against unauthorized
use or tampering. Maserati further stated
that if unauthorized use or tampering
with any of these protected areas is
detected, the vehicle’s horn/siren will
sound and the exterior lamps will flash.
Maserati further stated that activation
of its immobilizer device is
automatically achieved when the
ignition is turned from the ‘‘run’’
position to the ‘‘off’’ position. Once
activated, only the use of a valid key can
disable immobilization and allow the
vehicle to run. Maserati stated that the
device is deactivated by performing an
unlock actuation via the RKE
transmitter or by starting the vehicle
with a valid RFHub key. Specifically,
Maserati stated that to start the vehicle,
the driver must press and hold the brake
pedal while pressing the START/STOP
button. The system takes over and
engages the starter causing the starter
motor to run and automatically
disengage while the engine is running.
Maserati also stated that the RFHub
contains and controls the SKIS
preventing the engine from running
more than 2 seconds unless a valid
FOBIK key is used to start the engine.
Maserati stated that the vehicle’s key fob
with RKE transmitter, RFHub and the
KIN contains over 50,000 possible
electronic key combinations and allows
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
79996
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 23, 2015 / Notices
the driver to operate the ignition switch
with the push of a button as long as the
RKE transmitter is in the passenger
compartment.
Maserati’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of
the device, Maserati conducted tests
based on its own specified standards.
Maserati provided a detailed list of the
tests conducted (i.e., thermal
temperature exposure on system
components, resistance for humidity,
ice, water immersion, dust exposure,
drop shock on surfaces and topical
applications to detect deterioration of
key fob materials). Maserati stated that
the VTA, including the immobilizer
device and its related components must
meet design and durability requirements
for full vehicle useful life (10 years/120k
miles). Maserati also stated that it
believes that its device is reliable and
durable because it complied with
specified requirements for each test.
Maserati compared its proposed
device to the immobilizer antitheft
device that has been installed on its
Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicles as
standard equipment since MY 2007.
Maserati stated that the antitheft device
proposed for installation on the Levante
vehicle line will be identical to the
antitheft device installed on its
Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicle lines.
Maserati further stated that the Levante
vehicle line will incorporate identical
vehicle/system architecture, powertrain,
electrical and other vehicle systems
similar in construction and design to the
Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicle lines.
The agency granted the petition for the
Quattroporte vehicle line in full
beginning with MY 2014, (see 78 FR
24304, April 24, 2013) and the Ghibli
vehicle line beginning with the 2016
model year (see 80 FR 20065, April 14,
2015). Theft rate data reported in
Federal Register notices published by
the agency show that the theft rate for
the Quattroporte vehicle line, using an
average of three MYs’ data (2011–2013)
is 1.4684, which is significantly lower
than the median theft rate established
by the agency. There is no available
theft rate data for the Ghibli vehicle
line. Maserati believes that the low theft
rate experienced by the Quattroporte
vehicle line demonstrates the
effectiveness of the proposed
immobilizer device to be installed on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Dec 22, 2015
Jkt 238001
the Levante vehicle line. Maserati
further stated that historically, the
Maserati vehicles that have been
equipped with an antitheft device have
experienced extremely low to zero theft
rates as indicated by previous theft rate
data published by NHTSA. Maserati
also stated its belief that the advanced
technology antitheft device it proposes
to install on its Levante vehicle line is
comparable in functionality and
operation to other manufacturer’s
advanced antitheft devices that are
currently installed and have been
granted an exemption from the
partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Maserati on the antitheft
device, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Levante vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Maserati has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Levante vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information Maserati provided about its
device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of unauthorized
persons to enter or operate a vehicle by
means other than a key; preventing
defeat or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Maserati’s petition
for exemption for its Levante sports
utility vehicle line from the partsmarking requirements of 49 CFR part
541. The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes
in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC Under authority
delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015–32185 Filed 12–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79995-79996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32185]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Maserati North America, Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Maserati North America,
Inc.'s, (Maserati) petition for an exemption of the Levante sports
utility vehicle (SUV) line in accordance with 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the 49 CFR part 541, Federal
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2017 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-
443, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's
phone number is (202) 366-4139. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated October 23, 2015,
Maserati requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard for the Levante vehicle line beginning
with MY 2017. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its
petition, Maserati provided a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device for the Levante vehicle line. Maserati stated that beginning
with the 2017 model year, its Levante vehicles will be equipped with a
passive, antitheft device as standard equipment. Specifically, the
device will consist of a vehicle alarm system (VTA), a remote keyless
entry (RKE) system and a sentry key immobilizer system (SKIS). Key
components of Maserati's antitheft device are a siren and/or horn, hood
ajar switch, security indicator, RFHub/Keyless Ignition Node (KIN) and
Key fob (FOBIK), Intrusion and Inclination Sensor, Door Ajar Switches,
Intrusion Module, Central Body Controller, RKE and the SKIS. Maserati
also informed the agency that an audible and visual vehicle alarm
system (VTA) has been incorporated into the device to provide perimeter
protection that will monitor the vehicle's doors, tailgate, ignition
switch, interior vehicle intrusion and inclination sensors against
unauthorized use or tampering. Maserati further stated that if
unauthorized use or tampering with any of these protected areas is
detected, the vehicle's horn/siren will sound and the exterior lamps
will flash.
Maserati further stated that activation of its immobilizer device
is automatically achieved when the ignition is turned from the ``run''
position to the ``off'' position. Once activated, only the use of a
valid key can disable immobilization and allow the vehicle to run.
Maserati stated that the device is deactivated by performing an unlock
actuation via the RKE transmitter or by starting the vehicle with a
valid RFHub key. Specifically, Maserati stated that to start the
vehicle, the driver must press and hold the brake pedal while pressing
the START/STOP button. The system takes over and engages the starter
causing the starter motor to run and automatically disengage while the
engine is running. Maserati also stated that the RFHub contains and
controls the SKIS preventing the engine from running more than 2
seconds unless a valid FOBIK key is used to start the engine. Maserati
stated that the vehicle's key fob with RKE transmitter, RFHub and the
KIN contains over 50,000 possible electronic key combinations and
allows
[[Page 79996]]
the driver to operate the ignition switch with the push of a button as
long as the RKE transmitter is in the passenger compartment.
Maserati's submission is considered a complete petition as required
by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in
Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Maserati
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Maserati provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., thermal temperature
exposure on system components, resistance for humidity, ice, water
immersion, dust exposure, drop shock on surfaces and topical
applications to detect deterioration of key fob materials). Maserati
stated that the VTA, including the immobilizer device and its related
components must meet design and durability requirements for full
vehicle useful life (10 years/120k miles). Maserati also stated that it
believes that its device is reliable and durable because it complied
with specified requirements for each test.
Maserati compared its proposed device to the immobilizer antitheft
device that has been installed on its Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicles
as standard equipment since MY 2007. Maserati stated that the antitheft
device proposed for installation on the Levante vehicle line will be
identical to the antitheft device installed on its Quattroporte and
Ghibli vehicle lines. Maserati further stated that the Levante vehicle
line will incorporate identical vehicle/system architecture,
powertrain, electrical and other vehicle systems similar in
construction and design to the Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicle lines.
The agency granted the petition for the Quattroporte vehicle line in
full beginning with MY 2014, (see 78 FR 24304, April 24, 2013) and the
Ghibli vehicle line beginning with the 2016 model year (see 80 FR
20065, April 14, 2015). Theft rate data reported in Federal Register
notices published by the agency show that the theft rate for the
Quattroporte vehicle line, using an average of three MYs' data (2011-
2013) is 1.4684, which is significantly lower than the median theft
rate established by the agency. There is no available theft rate data
for the Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati believes that the low theft rate
experienced by the Quattroporte vehicle line demonstrates the
effectiveness of the proposed immobilizer device to be installed on the
Levante vehicle line. Maserati further stated that historically, the
Maserati vehicles that have been equipped with an antitheft device have
experienced extremely low to zero theft rates as indicated by previous
theft rate data published by NHTSA. Maserati also stated its belief
that the advanced technology antitheft device it proposes to install on
its Levante vehicle line is comparable in functionality and operation
to other manufacturer's advanced antitheft devices that are currently
installed and have been granted an exemption from the partsmarking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Maserati on the
antitheft device, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the
Levante vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Maserati has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for the Levante vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information Maserati
provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons to enter or
operate a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Maserati's petition for exemption for its Levante sports utility
vehicle line from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given
model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-
marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC Under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 1.95
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015-32185 Filed 12-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P