Negotiated Rulemaking Committee; Negotiator Nominations and Schedule of Committee Meetings-Borrower Defenses, 79276-79277 [2015-32007]
Download as PDF
79276
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December
11, 2015.
Lance T. Gant,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after reaching the hours or landings
threshold, whichever occurs first, listed in
Table 1 to Paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or
within 110 hours TIS from the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 110 hours
TIS, using a 10X or higher magnifying glass
and a light, inspect the 9-degree fuselage
frame on the right-hand (RH) and left-hand
(LH) sides for a crack in the areas depicted
in Figures 1 and 2 of Airbus Helicopters
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No.
AS365 05.00.57, Revision 2, dated April 7,
2014, or EASB No. SA366 05.39, Revision 2,
dated April 7, 2014, as applicable to your
model helicopter. For purposes of this AD, a
landing would be counted anytime the
helicopter lifts off into the air and then lands
again regardless of the duration of the
landing and regardless of whether the engine
is shut down.
[FR Doc. 2015–31847 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (f)(1)
Helicopter model
SA–365N ..........
SA–365N1 ........
AS–365N2 ........
AS 365 N3 ........
SA–366G1 ........
Hours TIS
11,490
10,490
9,140
8,740
8,390
Landings
22,980
20,980
18,280
17,480
16,780
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight,
repair the frame. Repairing a frame does not
constitute terminating actions for the
repetitive inspection requirements of this
AD.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, Texas 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@
faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2014–0159, dated July 7, 2014. You may
view the EASA AD on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FAA–2015–3741.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5311, Fuselage Main, Frame.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED–2015–OPE–0103]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee;
Negotiator Nominations and Schedule
of Committee Meetings—Borrower
Defenses
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Intent to establish negotiated
rulemaking committee.
AGENCY:
On October 20, 2015, we
announced our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee to
prepare proposed regulations for the
Federal Student Aid programs
authorized under title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA), and solicited nominations for
individual negotiators for the
committee. We are requesting additional
nominations for individual negotiators
who represent specific stakeholder
constituencies for the issues to be
negotiated to serve on the committee.
DATES: We must receive your
nominations for negotiators to serve on
the committee on or before December
28, 2015. The dates, times, and locations
of the committee meetings are set out in
the Schedule for Negotiations section in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Please send your
nominations for negotiators to Barbara
Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room
8019, Washington, DC 20006.
Telephone: (202) 502–7649 or by email:
Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the content of this
notice, including information about the
negotiated rulemaking process or the
nomination submission process,
contact: Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street
NW., Room 8019, Washington, DC
20006. Telephone: (202) 502–7649 or by
email: Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
For information about negotiated
rulemaking in general, see The
Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title
IV Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at www2.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On
October 20, 2015, we published a notice
in the Federal Register (80 FR 63478)
announcing our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee to
address for loans made under the
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
(Direct Loan) Program: (1) The
procedures to be used for a borrower to
establish a defense to repayment; (2) the
criteria that the Department will use to
identify acts or omissions of an
institution that constitute defenses to
repayment of Direct Loans, including
the creation of a Federal standard; (3)
the standards and procedures that the
Department will use to determine the
liability of the institution for amounts
based on borrower defenses; (4) the
effect of borrower defenses on
institutional capability assessments; and
(5) other loan discharges. We noted that,
in addition, the committee may also
consider if and how these issues will
affect the Federal Family Education
Loan (FFEL) Program.
In that notice, we set a schedule for
the committee meetings and requested
nominations for individual negotiators
who represent stakeholder
constituencies for the issues to be
negotiated to serve on the committee.
We are requesting additional
nominations for individual negotiators
who represent the following stakeholder
constituencies for the issues to be
negotiated to serve on the committee:
• State higher education executive
officers.
• Institutions of higher education
eligible to receive Federal assistance
under title III, parts A, B, and F, and
title V of the HEA, which include
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Hispanic-Serving
Institutions, American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities,
Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions, Predominantly
Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy
students as defined in title III of the
HEA.
• Two-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Private, for-profit institutions of
higher education.
• National, regional, or specialized
accrediting agencies.
We intend to select negotiators for the
committee who represent the interests
significantly affected by the topics
proposed for negotiations. In so doing,
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
we will follow the requirement in
section 492(b)(1) of the HEA that the
individuals selected must have
demonstrated expertise or experience in
the relevant topics proposed for
negotiations. We will also select
individual negotiators who reflect the
diversity among program participants,
in accordance with section 492(b)(1) of
the HEA. Our goal is to establish a
committee that will allow significantly
affected parties to be represented while
keeping the committee size manageable.
We generally select a primary and
alternate negotiator for each
constituency represented on the
committee. The primary negotiator
participates for the purpose of
determining consensus. The alternate
participates for the purpose of
determining consensus in the absence of
the primary. Either the primary or the
alternate may speak during the
negotiations.
The committee may create subgroups
on particular topics that may involve
individuals who are not members of the
committee. Individuals who are not
selected as members of the committee
will be able to observe the committee
meetings, will have access to the
individuals representing their
constituencies, and may be able to
participate in informal working groups
on various issues between the meetings.
The goal of the committee is to
develop proposed regulations that
reflect a final consensus of the
committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the
negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the
Department. An individual selected as a
negotiator will be expected to represent
the interests of his or her organization
or group and participate in the
negotiations in a manner consistent
with the goal of developing proposed
regulations on which the committee will
reach consensus. If consensus is
reached, all members of the organization
or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are
prohibited from commenting negatively
on the resulting proposed regulations.
The Department will not consider any
such negative comments on the
proposed regulations that are submitted
by members of such an organization or
group.
Nominations: Nominations should
include:
• The name of the nominee, the
organization or group the nominee
represents, and a description of the
interests that the nominee represents.
• Evidence of the nominee’s expertise
or experience in the topics proposed for
negotiations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
• Evidence of support from
individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will
represent.
• The nominee’s commitment that he
or she will actively participate in good
faith in the development of the
proposed regulations.
• The nominee’s contact information,
including address, phone number, and
email address.
For a better understanding of the
negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated
Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at www2.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html prior to committing to
serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or
not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department’s
review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations
The committee will meet for three
sessions on the following dates:
Session 1: January 12–14, 2016
Session 2: February 17–19, 2016
Session 3: March 16–18, 2016
Sessions will run from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m.
The January and February committee
meetings will be held at the U.S.
Department of Education at: 1990 K
Street NW., Eighth Floor Conference
Center, Washington, DC 20006.
The March committee meetings will
be held at: Union Center Plaza (UCP)
Learning Center, 830 First Street NE.,
Lobby Level, Washington, DC 20002.
The meetings are open to the public.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) by
contacting Wendy Macias, U.S.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street
NW., Room 8013, Washington, DC
20006. Telephone: (202) 502–7526 or by
email: Wendy.Macias@ed.gov.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site. You may also
access documents of the Department
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79277
published in the Federal Register by
using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Jamienne S. Studley, Deputy Under
Secretary, to perform the functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: December 16, 2015.
Jamienne S. Studley,
Deputy Under Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–32007 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 1
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2015–0074]
Request for Submission of Topics for
USPTO Quality Case Studies
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Initiation of Pilot Program and
Request for Program Topics.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is initiating
a new pilot program as part of its
Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative.
Currently, the USPTO performs reviews
of applications on target issues for
internal quality purposes, referred to as
‘‘case studies.’’ The USPTO now seeks
to leverage the experience of its
stakeholders to expand the use of case
studies to additional quality-related
topics. Beginning immediately,
stakeholders are invited to submit
patent quality-related topics that they
believe should be the subject of a case
study. After considering the submitted
topics, the USPTO will identify which
topics will be the subject of upcoming
case studies. The USPTO anticipates
that the results of these case studies will
help it to understand better the quality
of its work products and, where
appropriate, to take action to remediate
quality issues or to formulate best
practices to further enhance quality.
Such public engagement is sought not
only to broaden the scope of quality
issues currently studied by the USPTO,
but also to continue stakeholder
involvement in the quality review
process and to maintain a transparent
quality enhancement process.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79276-79277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32007]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED-2015-OPE-0103]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee; Negotiator Nominations and
Schedule of Committee Meetings--Borrower Defenses
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Intent to establish negotiated rulemaking committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 20, 2015, we announced our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee to prepare proposed regulations for the
Federal Student Aid programs authorized under title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), and solicited nominations for
individual negotiators for the committee. We are requesting additional
nominations for individual negotiators who represent specific
stakeholder constituencies for the issues to be negotiated to serve on
the committee.
DATES: We must receive your nominations for negotiators to serve on the
committee on or before December 28, 2015. The dates, times, and
locations of the committee meetings are set out in the Schedule for
Negotiations section in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Please send your nominations for negotiators to Barbara
Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8019,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7649 or by email:
Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the content of
this notice, including information about the negotiated rulemaking
process or the nomination submission process, contact: Barbara
Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8019,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7649 or by email:
Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
For information about negotiated rulemaking in general, see The
Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV Regulations, Frequently
Asked Questions at www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 20, 2015, we published a notice
in the Federal Register (80 FR 63478) announcing our intention to
establish a negotiated rulemaking committee to address for loans made
under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program:
(1) The procedures to be used for a borrower to establish a defense to
repayment; (2) the criteria that the Department will use to identify
acts or omissions of an institution that constitute defenses to
repayment of Direct Loans, including the creation of a Federal
standard; (3) the standards and procedures that the Department will use
to determine the liability of the institution for amounts based on
borrower defenses; (4) the effect of borrower defenses on institutional
capability assessments; and (5) other loan discharges. We noted that,
in addition, the committee may also consider if and how these issues
will affect the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program.
In that notice, we set a schedule for the committee meetings and
requested nominations for individual negotiators who represent
stakeholder constituencies for the issues to be negotiated to serve on
the committee. We are requesting additional nominations for individual
negotiators who represent the following stakeholder constituencies for
the issues to be negotiated to serve on the committee:
State higher education executive officers.
Institutions of higher education eligible to receive
Federal assistance under title III, parts A, B, and F, and title V of
the HEA, which include Historically Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanic-Serving Institutions, American Indian Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions, Predominantly Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy students as defined in title III
of the HEA.
Two-year public institutions of higher education.
Private, for-profit institutions of higher education.
National, regional, or specialized accrediting agencies.
We intend to select negotiators for the committee who represent the
interests significantly affected by the topics proposed for
negotiations. In so doing,
[[Page 79277]]
we will follow the requirement in section 492(b)(1) of the HEA that the
individuals selected must have demonstrated expertise or experience in
the relevant topics proposed for negotiations. We will also select
individual negotiators who reflect the diversity among program
participants, in accordance with section 492(b)(1) of the HEA. Our goal
is to establish a committee that will allow significantly affected
parties to be represented while keeping the committee size manageable.
We generally select a primary and alternate negotiator for each
constituency represented on the committee. The primary negotiator
participates for the purpose of determining consensus. The alternate
participates for the purpose of determining consensus in the absence of
the primary. Either the primary or the alternate may speak during the
negotiations.
The committee may create subgroups on particular topics that may
involve individuals who are not members of the committee. Individuals
who are not selected as members of the committee will be able to
observe the committee meetings, will have access to the individuals
representing their constituencies, and may be able to participate in
informal working groups on various issues between the meetings.
The goal of the committee is to develop proposed regulations that
reflect a final consensus of the committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the Department. An individual selected as
a negotiator will be expected to represent the interests of his or her
organization or group and participate in the negotiations in a manner
consistent with the goal of developing proposed regulations on which
the committee will reach consensus. If consensus is reached, all
members of the organization or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are prohibited from commenting negatively on
the resulting proposed regulations. The Department will not consider
any such negative comments on the proposed regulations that are
submitted by members of such an organization or group.
Nominations: Nominations should include:
The name of the nominee, the organization or group the
nominee represents, and a description of the interests that the nominee
represents.
Evidence of the nominee's expertise or experience in the
topics proposed for negotiations.
Evidence of support from individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will represent.
The nominee's commitment that he or she will actively
participate in good faith in the development of the proposed
regulations.
The nominee's contact information, including address,
phone number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked Questions at www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html prior to committing to serve
as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department's review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations
The committee will meet for three sessions on the following dates:
Session 1: January 12-14, 2016
Session 2: February 17-19, 2016
Session 3: March 16-18, 2016
Sessions will run from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
The January and February committee meetings will be held at the
U.S. Department of Education at: 1990 K Street NW., Eighth Floor
Conference Center, Washington, DC 20006.
The March committee meetings will be held at: Union Center Plaza
(UCP) Learning Center, 830 First Street NE., Lobby Level, Washington,
DC 20002.
The meetings are open to the public.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) by contacting Wendy Macias, U.S. Department
of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8013, Washington, DC 20006.
Telephone: (202) 502-7526 or by email: Wendy.Macias@ed.gov.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary of Education has delegated
authority to Jamienne S. Studley, Deputy Under Secretary, to perform
the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: December 16, 2015.
Jamienne S. Studley,
Deputy Under Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-32007 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P