Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange Rules To Prescribe the Securities Traders Examination as the Qualifying Examination for Employees of ETP Holders Engaged Solely in Proprietary Trading, and Amend Continuing Education Requirement Applicable to Such Members, 77068-77070 [2015-31277]

Download as PDF 77068 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 238 / Friday, December 11, 2015 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. [FR Doc. 2015–31283 Filed 12–10–15; 8:45 am] II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76578; File No. SR– NYSEARCA–2015–117) Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange Rules To Prescribe the Securities Traders Examination as the Qualifying Examination for Employees of ETP Holders Engaged Solely in Proprietary Trading, and Amend Continuing Education Requirement Applicable to Such Members December 8, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on November 23, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to prescribe the Securities Traders examination (Series 57) (the ‘‘Series 57 Examination’’) as the qualifying examination for employees of ETP Holders 4 (‘‘Member’’) engaged solely in proprietary trading, and amend Exchange rules regarding continuing education requirement applicable to such Members. The proposed rule 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 Pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(n), the term ‘‘ETP Holder’’ refers to a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability company or other organization in good standing that has been issued an ETP. An ETP Holder must be a registered broker or dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Act. NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(m) defines ‘‘ETP’’ as an Equity Trading Permit issued by the Exchange for effecting approved securities transactions on the Exchange. jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Dec 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Rule 2.21 currently requires each employee of an ETP Holder compensated directly or indirectly for the solicitation or handling of business in securities, including trading in securities for the account of the ETP Holder to be appropriately registered in Web CRD. The rule further states that in order to satisfy the registration requirement, among other things, a Member must satisfy applicable examination requirements as prescribed by the Exchange. In order to engage in proprietary trading on the Exchange, or directly supervise such activity, employees of ETP Holders must be registered as a General Securities Representative (Series 7) as NYSE Arca does not recognize the Series 56 Examination as an acceptable qualification standard for employees of ETP Holders engaged in equities proprietary trading.5 The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.21 to recognize a new category of limited representative registration for a Securities Trader and allow such individual to register in Web CRD 6 as a 5 While the Series 7 Examination is required for employees of ETP Holders engaged in proprietary trading, Exchange rules do not require such individuals to work at a proprietary trading firm only. These individuals can work at any type of firm. However, they only may engage in proprietary trading at the firm where they are employed. For example, an individual engaged in proprietary trading at a full service firm, who is registered solely to engage in proprietary trading, may not act as a registered representative for that firm. 6 Web CRD is the central licensing and registration system for the U.S. securities industry and its regulators. PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Securities Trader in order to engage in proprietary trading. As proposed, a Securities Trader would be any person engaged in the purchase or sale of securities or other similar instruments for the account of an ETP Holder with which such person is associated, as an employee or otherwise, and who does not transact any business with the public.7 Under the proposed rule, a Securities Trader must be registered as such on Web CRD and pass an appropriate qualification examination as prescribed by the Exchange. With this proposed rule change, a Member engaged solely in proprietary trading, or who supervises such activity, would qualify for registration by passing the Series 57 Examination. The Series 57 Examination is being developed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) in consultation with industry and exchange representatives. The Series 57 Examination will be based on industry rules applicable to trading of equity securities and listed options contracts. The Series 57 examination will cover, among other things, recordkeeping and recording requirements; types and characteristics of securities and investments; trading practices; and display, execution, and trading systems.8 The Exchange believes that acceptance of the Series 57 Examination will benefit both the Exchange and the applicable proprietary traders affected by the proposal because the examination would allow an individual who wishes to transact business on NYSE Arca in a limited capacity to qualify by passing an examination tailored to that limited capacity. Individuals currently engaged solely in proprietary trading, who currently qualify for registration by passing the Series 7 Examination and have registered in Web CRD as Proprietary Traders will have their registration converted in Web CRD on January 4, 2016 to a Securities Trader without having to take any additional examinations and without having to take any other actions. However, the registration of individuals who have taken the Series 7 Examination will not be converted to a Securities Trader if they have not registered as a Proprietary Trader in Web CRD by December 28, 2015. After that date, these individuals 7 The proposed definition is similar to NYSE MKT LLC Rule 341, Commentary .01(c) and NYSE Arca, Inc. Rule 2.23(b)(2)(C) [sic]. 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75783 (August 28, 2015), 80 FR 53369 (September 3, 2015) (SR–FINRA–2015–017) (Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change to Establish the Securities Trader and Securities Trader Principal Registration Categories). E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 238 / Friday, December 11, 2015 / Notices would be required to take the Series 57 Examination in order to register as Securities Traders as the Series 7 Examination would no longer serve as a qualifying exam to engage solely in proprietary trading on the Exchange. In addition, individuals registered as Proprietary Traders in Web CRD prior to the effective date of the proposed rule change will be eligible to register as Securities Traders without having to take any additional examinations, provided that no more than two years have passed between the date the individual last registered as a Proprietary Trader and the date the individual registers as a Securities Trader.9 In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.21 to create a new category of limited representative Principal—the Securities Trader Principal. Registration as a Securities Trader Principal would be restricted to individuals whose supervisory responsibilities are limited to Securities Traders, as defined in amended Commentary .03 to Rule 2.21. As proposed, a supervisor of a Securities Trader must satisfy its registration requirements under Commentary .03 to Rule 2.21 by registering and qualifying as a Securities Trader Principal in Web CRD if (a) such supervisor’s supervisory responsibilities are limited solely to supervising Securities Traders; (b) such supervisor is qualified to be so registered by passing the General Securities Principal Qualification Examination—Series 24; and (c) such supervisor is registered pursuant to Exchange Rules as a Securities Trader. Under the proposed rule change, a Securities Trader Principal would not be qualified to function in a Principal or supervisory capacity with responsibility over any area of business other than that involving proprietary trading.10 The Exchange notes that in order to currently qualify as a Proprietary Trader Principal, an individual must pass the Series 7 Examination and the Series 24 Examination. Once the Series 57 Examination becomes the qualifying exam for a Securities Trader, such individuals would need to pass the Series 57 Examination and the Series 24 Examination in order to register as a Securities Trader Principal. Only those individuals who are registered as such would be qualified to supervise a Securities Trader. Individuals registered as a General Securities Principal would not be qualified to supervise a Securities 9 See Rule 2.21, Commentary .04. proposed rule is similar to NYSE MKT LLC Rule 341, Commentary .01(e) and NYSE Arca, Inc. Rule 2.23(b)(3)(B). 10 The VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Dec 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 Trader, nor would a Securities Trader Principal be able to act as a General Securities Principal, unless the individual is appropriately registered as a Securities Trader Principal and a General Securities Principal. Further, registered persons are required under Rule 2.21(d) to comply with the Exchange’s continuing education requirements. Specifically, under Rule 2.21(d), no Member may permit any registered person to continue to, and no registered person may continue to, perform duties as a registered person, unless such person has complied with the Exchange’s continuing education requirements. The Exchange proposes to amend the rule to specifically require each registered person who is qualified solely as a Securities Trader to comply with the continuing education requirements appropriate for the Series 57.11 Within 30 days of filing the proposed rule change, the Exchange will issue a Regulatory Bulletin announcing the operative date of the rule change, which will not be sooner than January 4, 2016. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),12 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(c)(3)(B) 13 of the Act, pursuant to which a national securities exchange prescribes standards of training, experience and competence for members and their associated persons, and Section 6(b)(5) 14 of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed, among other things, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to make the Series 57 Examination the qualifying exam for individuals engaged solely in proprietary trading is appropriate because the Series 57 Examination addresses industry topics that establish the foundation for the regulatory and procedural knowledge necessary for such individuals to appropriately register under Exchange rules. In addition, the Series 57 Examination is expected to be shared by other exchanges and become the industry standard.15 Accordingly, adopting the 11 Registered persons will be required to complete the S101 Program to fulfill the Regulatory Element of their continuing education requirement. 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 13 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B). 14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 15 See supra, note 8. PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77069 Series 57 Examination will help to promote consistency in examination requirements and uniformity across markets. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change does not impose any additional examination burdens on persons who are already registered. There is no obligation to take the Series 57 examination in order to continue in their present duties, so the proposed rule change is not expected to disadvantage current registered persons relative to new entrants in this regard. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.17 Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 18 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),19 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 17 17 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 77070 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 238 / Friday, December 11, 2015 / Notices action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NYSEARCA–2015–117 and should be submitted on or before January 4, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.21 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–31277 Filed 12–10–15; 8:45 am] Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSEARCA–2015–117 on the subject line. jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEARCA–2015–117. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https:// www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the NYSE’s principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76567; File No. SR–CBOE– 2015–109] December 7, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 24, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site (https:// www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/ CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:55 Dec 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.3 Specifically, the Exchange proposes to increase the Customer Priority Surcharge fee assessed to contracts executed in VIX volatility index options (‘‘VIX options’’) and weekly S&P 500 options (‘‘SPXW options’’). Currently, the VIX Customer Priority Surcharge (‘‘VIX Surcharge’’) is assessed on all Customer (C) VIX contracts executed electronically that are Maker and not Market Turner. Additionally, the VIX Surcharge is only assessed on such contracts that have a premium of $0.11 or greater. The Exchange proposes to increase the VIX Surcharge from $0.10 per contract to $0.20 per contract on such contracts that have a premium of $0.11 or greater. The SPXW Customer Priority Surcharge (‘‘SPXW Surcharge’’) is currently assessed on all Customer (C) SPXW contracts executed electronically.4 The Exchange also proposes to increase the SPXW Surcharge from $0.05 per contract to $0.10 per contract. The Exchange also proposes to amend the Fees Schedule with respect to the Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’) Orders Rate Table. By way of background, the Fees Schedule currently provides for a ‘‘QCC Rate Table’’ which sets forth a transaction fee and credit for QCC transactions. In addition, the ‘‘Notes’’ section of the QCC Rate Table includes the definition of a QCC transaction. Specifically the ‘‘Notes’’ section currently provides that ‘‘A QCC transaction is comprised of an ‘initiating order’ to buy (sell) at least 1,000 contracts, coupled with a contraside order to sell (buy) an equal number of contracts . . .’’ The Exchange notes that it recently amended its QCC rules to expand the availability of QCC orders 3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on November 2, 2015 (SR–CBOE–2015– 101). On November 24, 2015, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this filing. 4 The SPXW Surcharge is not assessed to contracts executed by a floor broker using a PAR terminal or orders in SPXW options in SPXW electronic book that are executed during opening rotation on the final settlement day of VIX options and futures which have the expiration that contribute to the VIX settlement calculation. E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 238 (Friday, December 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77068-77070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76578; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2015-117)


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange 
Rules To Prescribe the Securities Traders Examination as the Qualifying 
Examination for Employees of ETP Holders Engaged Solely in Proprietary 
Trading, and Amend Continuing Education Requirement Applicable to Such 
Members

December 8, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on November 23, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to prescribe the 
Securities Traders examination (Series 57) (the ``Series 57 
Examination'') as the qualifying examination for employees of ETP 
Holders \4\ (``Member'') engaged solely in proprietary trading, and 
amend Exchange rules regarding continuing education requirement 
applicable to such Members. The proposed rule change is available on 
the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(n), the term ``ETP 
Holder'' refers to a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, 
limited liability company or other organization in good standing 
that has been issued an ETP. An ETP Holder must be a registered 
broker or dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Act. NYSE Arca 
Equities Rule 1.1(m) defines ``ETP'' as an Equity Trading Permit 
issued by the Exchange for effecting approved securities 
transactions on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Rule 2.21 currently requires each employee of an ETP Holder 
compensated directly or indirectly for the solicitation or handling of 
business in securities, including trading in securities for the account 
of the ETP Holder to be appropriately registered in Web CRD. The rule 
further states that in order to satisfy the registration requirement, 
among other things, a Member must satisfy applicable examination 
requirements as prescribed by the Exchange. In order to engage in 
proprietary trading on the Exchange, or directly supervise such 
activity, employees of ETP Holders must be registered as a General 
Securities Representative (Series 7) as NYSE Arca does not recognize 
the Series 56 Examination as an acceptable qualification standard for 
employees of ETP Holders engaged in equities proprietary trading.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ While the Series 7 Examination is required for employees of 
ETP Holders engaged in proprietary trading, Exchange rules do not 
require such individuals to work at a proprietary trading firm only. 
These individuals can work at any type of firm. However, they only 
may engage in proprietary trading at the firm where they are 
employed. For example, an individual engaged in proprietary trading 
at a full service firm, who is registered solely to engage in 
proprietary trading, may not act as a registered representative for 
that firm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.21 to recognize a new 
category of limited representative registration for a Securities Trader 
and allow such individual to register in Web CRD \6\ as a Securities 
Trader in order to engage in proprietary trading. As proposed, a 
Securities Trader would be any person engaged in the purchase or sale 
of securities or other similar instruments for the account of an ETP 
Holder with which such person is associated, as an employee or 
otherwise, and who does not transact any business with the public.\7\ 
Under the proposed rule, a Securities Trader must be registered as such 
on Web CRD and pass an appropriate qualification examination as 
prescribed by the Exchange. With this proposed rule change, a Member 
engaged solely in proprietary trading, or who supervises such activity, 
would qualify for registration by passing the Series 57 Examination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Web CRD is the central licensing and registration system for 
the U.S. securities industry and its regulators.
    \7\ The proposed definition is similar to NYSE MKT LLC Rule 341, 
Commentary .01(c) and NYSE Arca, Inc. Rule 2.23(b)(2)(C) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Series 57 Examination is being developed by the Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') in consultation with 
industry and exchange representatives. The Series 57 Examination will 
be based on industry rules applicable to trading of equity securities 
and listed options contracts. The Series 57 examination will cover, 
among other things, recordkeeping and recording requirements; types and 
characteristics of securities and investments; trading practices; and 
display, execution, and trading systems.\8\ The Exchange believes that 
acceptance of the Series 57 Examination will benefit both the Exchange 
and the applicable proprietary traders affected by the proposal because 
the examination would allow an individual who wishes to transact 
business on NYSE Arca in a limited capacity to qualify by passing an 
examination tailored to that limited capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75783 (August 28, 
2015), 80 FR 53369 (September 3, 2015) (SR-FINRA-2015-017) (Order 
Approving a Proposed Rule Change to Establish the Securities Trader 
and Securities Trader Principal Registration Categories).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Individuals currently engaged solely in proprietary trading, who 
currently qualify for registration by passing the Series 7 Examination 
and have registered in Web CRD as Proprietary Traders will have their 
registration converted in Web CRD on January 4, 2016 to a Securities 
Trader without having to take any additional examinations and without 
having to take any other actions. However, the registration of 
individuals who have taken the Series 7 Examination will not be 
converted to a Securities Trader if they have not registered as a 
Proprietary Trader in Web CRD by December 28, 2015. After that date, 
these individuals

[[Page 77069]]

would be required to take the Series 57 Examination in order to 
register as Securities Traders as the Series 7 Examination would no 
longer serve as a qualifying exam to engage solely in proprietary 
trading on the Exchange. In addition, individuals registered as 
Proprietary Traders in Web CRD prior to the effective date of the 
proposed rule change will be eligible to register as Securities Traders 
without having to take any additional examinations, provided that no 
more than two years have passed between the date the individual last 
registered as a Proprietary Trader and the date the individual 
registers as a Securities Trader.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Rule 2.21, Commentary .04.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.21 to create a 
new category of limited representative Principal--the Securities Trader 
Principal. Registration as a Securities Trader Principal would be 
restricted to individuals whose supervisory responsibilities are 
limited to Securities Traders, as defined in amended Commentary .03 to 
Rule 2.21. As proposed, a supervisor of a Securities Trader must 
satisfy its registration requirements under Commentary .03 to Rule 2.21 
by registering and qualifying as a Securities Trader Principal in Web 
CRD if (a) such supervisor's supervisory responsibilities are limited 
solely to supervising Securities Traders; (b) such supervisor is 
qualified to be so registered by passing the General Securities 
Principal Qualification Examination--Series 24; and (c) such supervisor 
is registered pursuant to Exchange Rules as a Securities Trader. Under 
the proposed rule change, a Securities Trader Principal would not be 
qualified to function in a Principal or supervisory capacity with 
responsibility over any area of business other than that involving 
proprietary trading.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The proposed rule is similar to NYSE MKT LLC Rule 341, 
Commentary .01(e) and NYSE Arca, Inc. Rule 2.23(b)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that in order to currently qualify as a 
Proprietary Trader Principal, an individual must pass the Series 7 
Examination and the Series 24 Examination. Once the Series 57 
Examination becomes the qualifying exam for a Securities Trader, such 
individuals would need to pass the Series 57 Examination and the Series 
24 Examination in order to register as a Securities Trader Principal. 
Only those individuals who are registered as such would be qualified to 
supervise a Securities Trader. Individuals registered as a General 
Securities Principal would not be qualified to supervise a Securities 
Trader, nor would a Securities Trader Principal be able to act as a 
General Securities Principal, unless the individual is appropriately 
registered as a Securities Trader Principal and a General Securities 
Principal.
    Further, registered persons are required under Rule 2.21(d) to 
comply with the Exchange's continuing education requirements. 
Specifically, under Rule 2.21(d), no Member may permit any registered 
person to continue to, and no registered person may continue to, 
perform duties as a registered person, unless such person has complied 
with the Exchange's continuing education requirements. The Exchange 
proposes to amend the rule to specifically require each registered 
person who is qualified solely as a Securities Trader to comply with 
the continuing education requirements appropriate for the Series 
57.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Registered persons will be required to complete the S101 
Program to fulfill the Regulatory Element of their continuing 
education requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Within 30 days of filing the proposed rule change, the Exchange 
will issue a Regulatory Bulletin announcing the operative date of the 
rule change, which will not be sooner than January 4, 2016.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\12\ in general, 
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(c)(3)(B) \13\ of the Act, 
pursuant to which a national securities exchange prescribes standards 
of training, experience and competence for members and their associated 
persons, and Section 6(b)(5) \14\ of the Act, in particular, in that it 
is designed, among other things, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change to make the Series 57 
Examination the qualifying exam for individuals engaged solely in 
proprietary trading is appropriate because the Series 57 Examination 
addresses industry topics that establish the foundation for the 
regulatory and procedural knowledge necessary for such individuals to 
appropriately register under Exchange rules. In addition, the Series 57 
Examination is expected to be shared by other exchanges and become the 
industry standard.\15\ Accordingly, adopting the Series 57 Examination 
will help to promote consistency in examination requirements and 
uniformity across markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \15\ See supra, note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change does 
not impose any additional examination burdens on persons who are 
already registered. There is no obligation to take the Series 57 
examination in order to continue in their present duties, so the 
proposed rule change is not expected to disadvantage current registered 
persons relative to new entrants in this regard.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\ 
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the 
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \18\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\19\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such

[[Page 77070]]

action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall 
institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-117 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-117. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of the filing will also be 
available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and 
on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be 
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2015-117 and should be 
submitted on or before January 4, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-31277 Filed 12-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.