Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014, 76674-76676 [2015-31188]

Download as PDF 76674 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices lodging, most meals, local ground transportation, except as stated in the proposed agenda, and air transportation from the United States to the mission site and return to the United States. Washington, DC, Tel: (202) 482–1706, Email: jeffrey.goldberg@trade.gov. Frank Spector, Acting Director, Trade Missions Program. [FR Doc. 2015–31144 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am] Timeline for Recruitment and Applications BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P Mission recruitment will be conducted in an open and public manner, including publication in the Federal Register, posting on the Commerce Department trade mission calendar (http://export.gov/industry/ education/) and other Internet Web sites, press releases to general and trade media, direct mail, notices by industry trade associations and other multiplier groups, and publicity at industry meetings, symposia, conferences, and trade shows. Recruitment for the mission will begin immediately and conclude no later than March 1, 2016. Applications for the mission will be accepted on a rolling basis. Applications received after March 1, 2016, will be considered only if space and scheduling constraints permit. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Conditions for Participation An applicant must submit a timely, completed and signed mission application and supplemental application materials, including adequate information on course offerings, primary market objectives, and goals for participation. The institution must have appropriate accreditation as specified per paragraph one above. The institution must be represented at the student fair by an employee. No agents will be allowed to represent a school on the mission or participate at the student fair. Agents will also not be allowed into the fairs to solicit new partnerships. If the Department of Commerce receives an incomplete application, the Department may reject the application, request additional information, or take the lack of information into account when evaluating the applications. Participants must travel to both stops in Panama and Honduras on the mission. Guatemala is the only optional stop. Each applicant must certify that the services it seeks to export through the mission are either produced in the United States, or, if not, marketed under the name of a U.S. firm and have at least 51 percent U.S. content of the value of the service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Goldberg, Industry & Analysis, Office of Trade Promotion Programs, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:33 Dec 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 International Trade Administration [A–489–501] Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013– 2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 5, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey.1 The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014. The review covers the following producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Borusan); 2 Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Toscelik); 3 and ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ Further, we find that one of the companies covered by this review had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Effective date: December 10, 2015. AGENCY: 1 See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 2014, 80 FR 32090 (June 5, 2015) (Preliminary Results). 2 As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department treats Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32090 and n. 3. 3 As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department treats Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. as the same legal entity. Id. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2924, (202) 482–2657, and (202) 482–0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background On June 5, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On July 26, 2015, we received a case brief from Toscelik. On July 27, 2015, we received case briefs from Allied Tube & Conduit and TMK IPSCO (petitioner) and from Borusan. On August 10, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from petitioner, Borusan, and Toscelik. The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description is dispositive.4 Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined that Erbosan had no shipments during the POR.5 Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding this company. As a consequence, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that Erbosan made no 4 A full written description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 2013–2014,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice and which is incorporated herein by reference. 5 See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32091 and the accompanying preliminary decision memorandum at 3–4. E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department’s practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.6 Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to the Preliminary Results. For a discussion of these changes, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Producer or exporter Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.7 .......... Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.8 ........................................ 3.16 0.00 6 See, e.g. Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:33 Dec 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For Borusan, because its weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment rates. We calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to liquidate its entries during the POR imported by the importers identified in its questionnaire responses without regard to antidumping duties because its weighted-average dumping margin in these final results is zero.9 Consistent with the Department’s assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Borusan, Erbosan, or Toscelik for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.10 We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. 7 Also includes Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. See footnote 3. 8 Also includes Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. See footnote 2. 9 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 10 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76675 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for Borusan and Toscelik will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.11 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply 11 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1 76676 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 2, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Company-Specific Comments Borusan 9. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Yield Loss Factor 10. Home Market Sales of Overruns and the Ordinary Course of Trade 11. Domestic Inland Freight Expenses 12. International Freight Expenses Toscelik 13. Billing Adjustments 14. Duty Drawback 15. Duty Drawback Adjustment to Cost 16. Toscelik’s Net Financial Expense Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–31188 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD [Recommendation 2015–1] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Emergency Preparedness and Response at the Pantex Plant Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. AGENCY: 19:33 Dec 09, 2015 The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published a notice of a recommendation to the Secretary of Energy in the Federal Register of December 3, 2015, (80 FR 75665), concerning emergency preparedness at the Pantex Plant. The Board corrects that notice by providing the additional information as set forth below. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General Comments 1. Duty Drawback 2. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Resource Utilization Support Fund 3. Deducting Certain Expenses from the Duty Drawback Calculation 4. Making a Duty Drawback Adjustment to Normal Value and/or Capping the U.S. Duty Drawback Adjustment 5. Treatment of Duty Drawback in the Cash Deposit Rate and Assessment Rate 6. Other Arguments Related to Duty Drawback 7. Differential Pricing Analysis Should Not Be Used Because the Cohen’s d Test Does Not Measure Targeted or Masked Dumping 8. Differential Pricing Analysis Reasoning for Use of Average-to-Transaction Comparison Methodology is Arbitrary and Unlawful VerDate Sep<11>2014 Notice, recommendation; correction. ACTION: Jkt 238001 Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004–2901, or telephone number (202) 694–7000. Correction In the Federal Register of December 3, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015–30562, on page 75673, in the first column, after line 37, add the following information: CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE SECRETARY Department of Energy Under Secretary for Nuclear Security Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration Washington, DC 20585 November 4, 2015 The Honorable Joyce L. Connery Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 65 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700 Washington, DC 20004 Dear Madam Chairman: On behalf of the Secretary, thank you for the opportunity to review the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Draft Recommendation 2015– 1, Emergency Preparedness and Response at the Pantex Plant. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has established specific performance goals for the Pantex Emergency Management Program, to include improvements in the three areas highlighted by the Draft Recommendation 2015–1. These goals are consistent with the mutually agreedupon benefits of implementing the DNFSB Recommendation 2014–1. The draft Recommendation’s risk assessment states: ‘‘it is not possible to do a quantitative assessment of the risk of these [the Pantex Emergency Management Program] elements to provide adequate protection of the PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 workers and the public.’’ As a point of clarification, the Department of Energy (DOE) demonstrates adequate protection of workers, the public and the environment as an integral part of operating a nuclear facility like that situated at the Pantex Plant. To this end, the Department has put in place a system of requirements, standards, policies and guidance that, when effectively implemented, not only provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection, but takes a very conservative approach to ensure such protection. Functions such as emergency management provide that additional conservatism and margin of protection. We are confident that, even with deficiencies identified by the DNFSB, the Pantex Emergency Management Program can perform its role to ensure this protection. Accordingly, DOE recommends removing the phrase: ‘‘in order to provide an adequate protection to the public and the workers’’ in justifying the need for the draft recommendation. To increase protection assurances and drive improvement in an effective and efficient manner, I suggest that the best approach to address the concerns identified in your Draft Recommendation is to incorporate ongoing NNSA performance improvement initiatives and enhancements into the existing implementation plans for Recommendation 2014–1. This approach would enable the Department to take a holistic, integrated approach to making the needed improvements at Pantex. We appreciate the DNFSB’s perspective and look forward to continued positive interactions with you and your staff to include Pantexspecific actions and milestones in the existing Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2014–1. If you have any questions, please contact me or Mr. Geoffrey Beausoleil, Manager, NNSA Production Office, at 865–576–0752. Sincerely, Frank G. Klotz E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76674-76676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-489-501]


Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 5, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube 
products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey.\1\ The period of review 
(POR) is May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014. The review covers the 
following producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Borusan 
Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret 
A.S. (collectively, Borusan); \2\ Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi 
A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Toscelik); \3\ and 
ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan). Based on our 
analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the 
margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the 
preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the 
reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ``Final 
Results of the Review.'' Further, we find that one of the companies 
covered by this review had no shipments of subject merchandise during 
the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From 
Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 32090 (June 5, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department 
treats Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan 
Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See Preliminary 
Results, 80 FR at 32090 and n. 3.
    \3\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department 
treats Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis 
Ticaret A.S. as the same legal entity. Id.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: December 10, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert 
James AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-2924, (202) 482-2657, and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 5, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of this review in the Federal Register. We invited parties to comment 
on the Preliminary Results. On July 26, 2015, we received a case brief 
from Toscelik. On July 27, 2015, we received case briefs from Allied 
Tube & Conduit and TMK IPSCO (petitioner) and from Borusan. On August 
10, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from petitioner, Borusan, and 
Toscelik. The Department conducted this review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The 
welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable 
under subheading 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 
7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The 
written description is dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A full written description of the scope of the order is 
contained in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube 
Products from Turkey; 2013-2014,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), 
dated concurrently with this notice and which is incorporated herein 
by reference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined 
that Erbosan had no shipments during the POR.\5\ Following publication 
of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested 
parties regarding this company. As a consequence, and because the 
record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that 
Erbosan made no

[[Page 76675]]

shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department's 
practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by 
Erbosan, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the 
all-others rate.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32091 and the accompanying 
preliminary decision memorandum at 3-4.
    \6\ See, e.g. Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of the Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this 
review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is 
hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues raised is 
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain 
changes to the Preliminary Results. For a discussion of these changes, 
see Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2013 
through April 30, 2014:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.\7\...........        3.16
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.\8\...................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final 
results of review within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Also includes Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. See footnote 
3.
    \8\ Also includes Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. See footnote 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    For Borusan, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not 
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department has 
calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates. We 
calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment 
rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the 
examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by 
the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct 
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by 
this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or 
de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which 
the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis.
    For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to liquidate its entries during 
the POR imported by the importers identified in its questionnaire 
responses without regard to antidumping duties because its weighted-
average dumping margin in these final results is zero.\9\ Consistent 
with the Department's assessment practice, for entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by Borusan, Erbosan, or Toscelik 
for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the 
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103, 8103 (February 14, 
2012).
    \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results 
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the 
Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for Borusan and Toscelik will be equal 
to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final 
results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was 
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will 
continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the 
LTFV investigation.\11\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard 
Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply

[[Page 76676]]

with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 2, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues

General Comments

1. Duty Drawback
2. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Resource Utilization Support 
Fund
3. Deducting Certain Expenses from the Duty Drawback Calculation
4. Making a Duty Drawback Adjustment to Normal Value and/or Capping 
the U.S. Duty Drawback Adjustment
5. Treatment of Duty Drawback in the Cash Deposit Rate and 
Assessment Rate
6. Other Arguments Related to Duty Drawback
7. Differential Pricing Analysis Should Not Be Used Because the 
Cohen's d Test Does Not Measure Targeted or Masked Dumping
8. Differential Pricing Analysis Reasoning for Use of Average-to-
Transaction Comparison Methodology is Arbitrary and Unlawful

Company-Specific Comments

Borusan

9. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Yield Loss Factor
10. Home Market Sales of Overruns and the Ordinary Course of Trade
11. Domestic Inland Freight Expenses
12. International Freight Expenses

Toscelik

13. Billing Adjustments
14. Duty Drawback
15. Duty Drawback Adjustment to Cost
16. Toscelik's Net Financial Expense
    Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-31188 Filed 12-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P